Search

Background and Hypothesis Trauma is a robust risk factor for delusional ideation. However, the specificity and processes underlying this relationship are unclear. Qualitatively, interpersonal traumas (i.e. trauma caused by another person) appear to have a specific relationship with delusional ideation, particularly paranoia, given the commonality of social threat. However, this has not been empirically tested and the processes by which interpersonal trauma contributes to delusional ideation remain poorly understood. Given the role of impaired sleep in both trauma and delusional ideation, it may be a critical mediator between these variables. We hypothesized that interpersonal trauma, but not non-interpersonal trauma, would be positively related to subtypes of delusional ideation, especially paranoia, and that impaired sleep would mediate these relationships. Study Design In a large, transdiagnostic community sample (N  = 478), an exploratory factor analysis of the Peter's Delusion Inventory identified three subtypes of delusional ideation, namely magical thinking, grandiosity, and paranoia. Three path models, one for each subtype of delusional ideation, tested whether interpersonal trauma and non-interpersonal trauma were related to subtypes of delusional ideation, and impaired sleep as a mediating variable of interpersonal trauma. Study Results Paranoia and grandiosity were positively related to interpersonal trauma and unrelated to non-interpersonal trauma. Furthermore, these relationships were significantly mediated by impaired sleep, which appeared strongest for paranoia. In contrast, magical thinking was unrelated to traumatic experiences. Conclusions These findings support a specific relationship between interpersonal trauma and paranoia as well as grandiosity, with impaired sleep appearing as an important process by which interpersonal trauma contributes to both. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Hypothesis: Schizophrenia is associated with a decreased pursuit of risky rewards during uncertain-risk decision-making. However, putative mechanisms subserving this disadvantageous risky reward pursuit, such as contributions of cognition and relevant traits, remain poorly understood., Study Design: Participants (30 schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder [SZ]; 30 comparison participants [CP]) completed the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Computational modeling captured subprocesses of uncertain-risk decision-making: Risk Propensity, Prior Belief of Success, Learning Rate, and Behavioral Consistency. IQ, self-reported risk-specific processes (ie, Perceived Risks and Expected Benefit of Risks), and non-risk-specific traits (ie, defeatist beliefs; hedonic tone) were examined for relationships with Risk Propensity to determine what contributed to differences in risky reward pursuit., Study Results: On the BART, the SZ group exhibited lower Risk Propensity, higher Prior Beliefs of Success, and comparable Learning Rates. Furthermore, Risk Propensity was positively associated with IQ across groups. Linear models predicting Risk Propensity revealed 2 interactions: 1 between group and Perceived Risk, and 1 between IQ and Perceived Risk. Specifically, in both the SZ group and individuals with below median IQ, lower Perceived Risks was related to lower Risk Propensity. Thus, lower perception of financial risks was associated with a less advantageous pursuit of uncertain-risk rewards., Conclusions: Findings suggest consistently decreased risk-taking on the BART in SZ may reflect risk imperception, the failure to accurately perceive and leverage relevant information to guide the advantageous pursuit of risky rewards. Additionally, our results highlight the importance of cognition in uncertain-risk decision-making., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)