Search

BackgroundResults from studies assessing the association between anticholinergic use and falls are mixed, and prior studies are limited in their ability to control for important potential confounders. Thus, we sought to examine the association between anticholinergic medication use, including over-the-counter medications, and recurrent falls in community-dwelling older women.MethodsWe analyzed data from a prospective cohort study of women aged 65 to 79 years from the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study and Clinical Trials. Women were recruited between 1993 and 1998, and analyses included 61,451 women with complete information. Medications with moderate or strong anticholinergic effects were ascertained directly from drug containers during face-to-face interviews. The main outcome measure was recurrent falls (≥2 falls in previous year), which was determined from self-report within 1.5 years subsequent to the medication assessment.ResultsAt baseline, 11.3 % were using an anticholinergic medication, of which antihistamines (commonly available over-the-counter) were the most common medication class (received by 45.2 % of individuals on anticholinergic medication). Using multivariable GEE models and controlling for potential confounders, the adjusted odds ratio for anticholinergic medication use was 1.51 (95 % CI, 1.43-1.60) for recurrent falls. Participants using multiple anticholinergic medications had a 100 % increase in likelihood of recurrent falls (adjusted odds ratio 2.00, 95 % CI 1.73-2.32). Results were robust to sensitivity analysis.ConclusionsAnticholinergic medication use was associated with increased risk for recurrent falls. Our findings reinforce judicious use of anticholinergic medications in older women. Public health efforts should emphasize educating older women regarding the risk of using over-the-counter anticholinergics, such as first-generation antihistamines.

BackgroundAnticholinergic medication use has been associated with several negative health outcomes in older adults, but little is known about its risk for fractures.ObjectiveTo examine the association between anticholinergic medication use and fracture outcomes in community-dwelling postmenopausal women.MethodsUtilizing a prospective cohort design, we examined data collected from 137,408 women aged 50-79 years from the Women's Health Initiative observational study and clinical trials not reporting hip fracture at baseline. Medications with moderate or strong anticholinergic effects were identified directly from drug containers during in-person interviews. The main outcome was fractures (hip, lower arm/wrist and total fractures). We performed multivariable Cox proportional hazard survival modelling to assess the association between anticholinergic use and the risk of fractures.ResultsAt baseline, 10.6% of the women were using an anticholinergic medication, of which antihistamines were the most common medication class (48.4%). The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios for anticholinergic medication use were 1.08 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-1.30) for hip fracture, 1.01 (95% CI 0.91-1.13) for lower arm/wrist fracture and 1.03 (95% CI 0.98-1.09) for total fractures. We observed no association according to subclass or count of anticholinergic medications, or trends between the duration of anticholinergic use and any of the fracture outcomes.ConclusionAnticholinergic medication use was not associated with an increased risk of fractures among community-dwelling women. Future research should make efforts to capture over-the-counter medication use and the cumulative anticholinergic burden in relation to important health outcomes for older adults.

Objective: First-line (1L) maintenance avelumab prolonged overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) in JAVELIN Bladder 100. OS was measured from maintenance initiation in patients with disease control following 1L platinum-based therapy (PBT). The OS impact of maintenance for the 1L PBT–treated population is unknown since it was not measured from 1L initiation, nor can it be benchmarked with other 1L therapies. To characterize the OS impact of maintenance avelumab, we used an oncology simulation model to estimate the OS of maintenance-eligible and -ineligible patients with aUC from 1L PBT initiation. Methods: We developed a simulated cohort of 1L PBT–treated patients with aUC, including those who did and did not receive maintenance avelumab. Eligibility was assessed at 5.6 months post 1L PBT initiation based on the JAVELIN trial design. Among the 1L-treated population, 58% (95% credible interval [CrI] 49– 67%) were projected to be eligible (calculated from contemporary phase 3 trials); of those, 85% were assumed to receive maintenance. The model estimated median OS (mOS) among a maintenance-ineligible simulated cohort which when combined with the maintenance-eligible cohort yielded an estimated OS in the overall maintenance- intended population from 1L PBT initiation. Results: Approximately half of the modeled 1L PBT–treated population received maintenance. Estimated mOS was 10.1 months (95% CrI 7.5– 13.5) for the maintenance-ineligible cohort, 29.3 months (95% CrI 24.8– 33.9) for the maintenance-eligible, received maintenance cohort, and 15.9 months (95% CrI 13.2– 19.1) in the overall maintenance-intended, 1L PBT–treated population, including those eligible and ineligible for maintenance. Conclusion: The model shows that maintenance avelumab has a modest impact on OS in the overall 1L PBT–treated population of patients with aUC. While maintenance avelumab improves OS for eligible patients, a large proportion of the maintenance-intended population may not receive maintenance due to ineligibility or physician/patient choice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: New and emerging therapies have significantly changed the bladder cancer (BC) treatment landscape and can potentially affect spending and patient care in CMS' Oncology Care Model (OCM), a service delivery and payment model for voluntarily participating practices. The objectives of this analysis were to estimate health care resource utilization (HCRU) and benchmark spending per OCM episode of BC, and to model spending drivers and quality metrics. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of OCM episodes triggered by receipt of anticancer therapy among Medicare beneficiaries from 2016 to 2018. Based on this, an average performance estimation was conducted to assess the impact of hypothetical changes in novel therapy use by OCM practices. RESULTS: BC accounted for approximately 3% (n = 60,099) of identified OCM episodes. Relative to low-risk episodes, high-risk episodes were associated with greater HCRU and worse OCM quality metrics. Mean spending per high-risk episode was $37,857 (low-risk episode: $9204), with $11,051 spent on systemic therapies and $7158 on inpatient services. In the estimation, high- and low-risk BC exceeded the spending target by 1.7% and 9.4%, respectively. This did not affect payments to practices and no retrospective payments were necessary. CONCLUSIONS: As 3% of OCM episodes were attributed to BC, with only one-third classified as high-risk, controlling expenditure on novel therapies for advanced BC is unlikely to affect overall practice performance. The average performance estimation further emphasized the minimal impact that novel therapy spending in high-risk BC has on OCM payments to practices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]