Search

Contains fulltext : 57878.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) OBJECTIVE: To determine the costs and cost reductions of an innovative strategy aimed at improving test ordering routines of primary care physicians, compared with a traditional strategy. DESIGN: Multicenter randomized controlled trial with randomization at the local primary care physicians group level. SETTING: Primary care: local primary care physicians groups in five regions of the Netherlands with diagnostic centers. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven existing local primary care physicians groups, including 194 primary care physicians. INTERVENTION: The test ordering strategy was developed systematically, and combined feedback, education on guidelines, and quality improvement sessions in small groups. In regular quality meetings in local groups, primary care physicians discussed each others' test ordering behavior, related it to guidelines, and made individual and/or group plans for change. Thirteen groups engaged in the entire strategy (complete intervention arm), while 14 groups received feedback only (feedback arm). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Running costs, development costs, and research costs were calculated for the intervention period per primary care physician per 6 months. The mean costs of tests ordered per primary care physician per 6 months were assessed at baseline and follow-up. RESULTS: The new strategy was found to cost 702.00, while the feedback strategy cost 58.00. When including running costs only, the intervention was found to cost 554.70, compared with 17.10 per primary care physician per 6 months in the feedback arm. When excluding opportunity costs for the physicians' time spent, the intervention was found to cost 92.70 per physician per 6 months in the complete intervention arm. The mean costs reduction that physicians in that arm achieved by reducing unnecessary tests was 144 larger per physician per 6 months than the physicians in the feedback arm (P = 0.048). CONCLUSION: On the basis of our findings, including the expected non-monetary benefits, we recommend further long-term effect and cost-effect studies on the implementation of the quality strategy.

Verstappen WHJM, ter Riet G, Dubois WI, Winkens R, Grol RPTM and van der Weijden T. Variation in test ordering behaviour of GPs: professional or context-related factors? Family Practice 2004; 21: 387‐395. Objective. The aim of this study was to describe GPs’ test ordering behaviour, and to establish professional and context-related determinants of GPs’ inclination to order tests. Methods. A cross-sectional analysis was carried out of 229 GPs in 40 local GP groups from five regions in The Netherlands of the combined number of 19 laboratory and eight imaging tests ordered by GPs, collected from five regional diagnostic centres. In a multivariable multilevel regression analysis, these data were linked with survey data on professional characteristics such as knowledge about and attitude towards test ordering, and with data on context-related factors such as practice type or experience with feedback on test ordering data. The main outcome measure was the percentage point differences associated with professional and context-related factors. Results. The total median number of tests per GP per year was 998 (interquartile range 663‐1500), with significant differences between the regions. The response to the survey was 97%. At the professional level, ‘individual involvement in developing guidelines’ (yes versus no), and at the context-related level ‘group practice’ (versus single-handed and two-person practices) and ‘more than 1 year of experience working with a problem-oriented laboratory order form’ (yes versus no) were associated with 27, 18 and 41% lower numbers of tests ordered, respectively. Conclusion. In addition to professional determinants, context-related factors appeared to be strongly associated with the numbers of tests ordered. Further studies on GPs’ test ordering behaviour should include local and regional factors.

The objective of this study was to identify risk factors for sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). A retrospective case-control study was performed consisting of a group of unselected patients who had suffered SCA and had a clinical history of CAD, and a group of unselected age- and gender-matched CAD control patients living in the region of Maastricht. Information about previous myocardial infarction (MI), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, smoking, and coffee and alcohol consumption was collected. A logistic regression model was fitted to all mentioned variables including age and genders. Included were 117 SCA cases (84% men, mean age 65 years [+/-7]) and 144 control patients (83% men, mean age 63 years [+/-8]). Previous MI (odds ratio [OR] 4.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-9.3), hypertension (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.5-6.1), heavy coffee consumption (10 cups per day) (OR 55.7, 95% CI 6.4-483), and a LVEF40% (OR 11.2, CI 4.4-28.5) were independent risk indicators for SCA in patients with CAD. Alcohol consumption (1-21 glasses per week) seemed to protect patients with CAD from SCA (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.2-0.98). These observations suggest that changes in lifestyle factors can be of potential importance in protecting patients with CAD from dying suddenly.

Objective—To study the circumstances and medical profile of out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) patients in whom resuscitation was attempted by the ambulance service, and to identify causes of SCA in survivors and factors that influence resuscitation success rate. Methods—During a five year period (1991-95) all cases of out-of-hospital SCA between the ages of 20 and 75 years and living in the Maastricht area in the Netherlands were studied. Information was gathered about the circumstances of SCA, as well as medical history for all patients in whom resuscitation was attempted by the ambulance personnel. Causes of SCA in survivors were studied and logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with survival. Results—Of 288 SCA patients in whom cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and advanced life support were applied, 47 (16%) were discharged alive from the hospital. Their mean (SD) age was 58 (11) years, 37 (79%) were men, and 24 (51%) had a history of cardiac disease. Acute myocardial infarction was diagnosed in 24 (51%) of the survivors; seven with and 17 without a history of cardiac disease. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) or ventricular tachycardia (VT) as the first documented rhythm was significantly positively associated with survival (odds ratio (OR) 5.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1 to 15.9). A time interval of less than four minutes between the moment of collapse and the start of resuscitation, and an ambulance delay time of less than eight minutes were significantly positively associated with survival (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.3 to 8.6, and OR, 3.6, 95% CI 1.3 to 10.5, respectively). A history of cardiac disease was negatively associated with survival (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.98). Conclusions—Acute myocardial infarction was the underlying mechanism of SCA in most of the survivors, especially in those without a history of cardiac disease. CPR within four minutes, an ambulance delay time less than eight minutes, and VT or VF diagnosed by the paramedics were positively associated with success. Keywords: cardiac arrest; sudden death; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; paramedics

Objectives. We sought to describe the incidence, characteristics and survival of out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) in the Maastricht area of The Netherlands.Background. Incidence and survival rates of out-of-hospital SCA in different communities are often based on the number of victims resuscitated by the emergency medical services. Our population-based study in the Maastricht area allows information on all victims of witnessed and unwitnessed SCA occurring outside the hospital.Methods. Incidence, patient characteristics and survival rates were determined by prospectively collecting information on all cases of SCA occurring in the age group 20 to 75 years between January 1, 1991 and December 31, 1994. Survival rates were related to the site of the event (at home vs. outside the home) and the presence or absence of a witness and rhythm at the time of the resuscitation attempt in out-of-hospital SCA.Results. Five hundred fifteen patients were included (72% men, 28% women). In 44% of men and 53% of women, SCA was most likely the first manifestation of heart disease. In patients known to have had a previous myocardial infarction (MI), the mean interval between the MI and SCA was 6.5 years, with >50% having a left ventricular ejection fraction >30%. The mean yearly incidence of SCA was 1 in 1,000 inhabitants. Of all deaths in the age groups studied, 18.5% were sudden. Nearly 80% of SCAs occurred at home. In 60% of all cases of SCA a witness was present. Cardiac resuscitation, which was attempted in 51% of all subjects, resulted overall in 32 (6%) of 515 patients being discharged alive from the hospital. Survival rates for witnessed SCA were 8% (16 of 208 subjects) at home and 18% (15 of 85 subjects) outside the home (95% confidence interval 1% to 18.8%).Conclusions. The majority of victims of SCA cannot be identified before the event. Sudden cardiac arrest usually occurs at home, and the survival of those with a witnessed SCA at home was low compared with that outside the home, indicating the necessity of optimizing out-of-hospital resuscitation, especially in the at-home situation.

Contains fulltext : 58145.pdf ( ) (Open Access) PURPOSE: We wanted to evaluate the added value of small peer-group quality improvement meetings compared with simple feedback as a strategy to improve test-ordering behavior. Numbers of tests ordered by primary care physicians are increasing, and many of these tests seem to be unnecessary according to established, evidence-based guidelines. METHODS: We enrolled 194 primary care physicians from 27 local primary care practice groups in 5 health care regions (5 diagnostic centers). The study was a cluster randomized trial with randomization at the local physician group level. We evaluated an innovative, multifaceted strategy, combining written comparative feedback, group education on national guidelines, and social influence by peers in quality improvement sessions in small groups. The strategy was aimed at 3 specific clinical topics: cardiovascular issues, upper abdominal complaints, and lower abdominal complaints. The mean number of tests per physician per 6 months at baseline and the physicians' region were used as independent variables, and the mean number of tests per physician per 6 months was the dependent variable. RESULTS: The new strategy was executed in 13 primary care groups, whereas 14 groups received feedback only. For all 3 clinical topics, the decrease in mean total number of tests ordered by physicians in the intervention arm was far more substantial (on average 51 fewer tests per physician per half-year) than the decrease in mean number of tests ordered by physicians in the feedback arm (P = .005). Five tests considered to be inappropriate for the clinical problem of upper abdominal complaints decreased in the intervention arm, with physicians in the feedback arm ordering 13 more tests per 6 months (P = .002). Interdoctor variation in test ordering decreased more in the intervention arm. CONCLUSION: Compared with only disseminating comparative feedback reports to primary care physicians, the new strategy of involving peer interaction and social influence improved the physicians' test-ordering behavior. To be effective, feedback needs to be integrated in an interactive, educational environment.