Search

The COVID-19 pandemic imposed many challenges on pregnant women, including rapid changes to antenatal care aimed at reducing the societal spread of the virus. This study aimed to assess how the pandemic affected perinatal mental health and other pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in a tertiary unit in Queensland, Australia. This was a retrospective cohort study of pregnant women booked for care between March 2019 – June 2019 and March 2020 – June 2020. A total of 1984 women were included with no confirmed cases of COVID-19. The primary outcome of this study was adverse maternal mental health defined as an Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale score of ≥13 or an affirmative response to 'EPDS Question 10'. Secondary outcomes were preterm birth <37 weeks and <32 weeks, mode of birth, low birth weight, malpresentation in labour, hypertensive disease, anaemia, iron/vitamin B12 deficiency, stillbirth and a composite of neonatal morbidity and mortality. There were no differences in the primary perinatal mental health outcomes. The rates of composite adverse neonatal outcomes (27 vs. 34 %, p<0.001) during the pandemic were higher; however, there was no difference in perinatal mortality (p=1.0), preterm birth (p=0.44) or mode of delivery (p=0.38). Although there were no adverse consequences on maternal mental health during the pandemic, there was a concerning increase in neonatal morbidity potentially due to the altered model of maternity care implemented in the early COVID-19 pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Queensland introduced a colour‐coded cardiotocograph (CTG) classification system (green, blue, yellow and red) to complement the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists prose‐based classification system of 'low, unlikely, maybe or likely' fetal compromise. Aims: The aim of the study was to determine the clinical impact of the introduction of the colour‐coded CTG classification system compared to the prose‐based system. We hypothesised there would be no change in the rate of operative delivery for intrapartum fetal compromise (OD‐IFC). Materials and methods: This retrospective non‐inferiority study from November 2014 to May 2018 used routinely collected data from the Mater Mother's Hospital. Non‐insured women with a singleton, non‐anomalous, cephalic fetus at term, attempting a vaginal birth with continuous intrapartum CTG were included. The primary outcome was OD‐IFC. Secondary outcomes included various obstetric and perinatal outcomes. Non‐inferiority analysis was performed with a pre‐specified non‐inferiority margin of 2% risk difference. Results: Eleven thousand seven hundred and twenty‐seven participants were included. The OD‐IFC rate was similar across the study groups (prose‐based 15.1% vs colour‐coded 15.3%, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.02, 95% CI 0.93–1.13) with the adjusted risk difference of 0.29% (95% CI −0.98 to 1.56), which did not exceed the inferiority margin. There were more spontaneous (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.04–1.19) and fewer instrumental (aOR 0.87, 95% CI 0.80–0.95) vaginal births in the colour‐coded cohort. There were no differences in neonatal outcomes. Conclusions: Reassuringly, the colour‐coded CTG classification system was non‐inferior to the prose‐based system, did not influence OD‐IFC but was associated with more spontaneous vaginal deliveries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic imposed many challenges on pregnant women, including rapid changes to antenatal care aimed at reducing the societal spread of the virus. This study aimed to assess how the pandemic affected perinatal mental health and other pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in a tertiary unit in Queensland, Australia., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of pregnant women booked for care between March 2019 - June 2019 and March 2020 - June 2020. A total of 1984 women were included with no confirmed cases of COVID-19. The primary outcome of this study was adverse maternal mental health defined as an Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale score of ≥13 or an affirmative response to 'EPDS Question 10'. Secondary outcomes were preterm birth <37 weeks and <32 weeks, mode of birth, low birth weight, malpresentation in labour, hypertensive disease, anaemia, iron/vitamin B12 deficiency, stillbirth and a composite of neonatal morbidity and mortality., Results: There were no differences in the primary perinatal mental health outcomes. The rates of composite adverse neonatal outcomes (27 vs. 34 %, p<0.001) during the pandemic were higher; however, there was no difference in perinatal mortality (p=1.0), preterm birth (p=0.44) or mode of delivery (p=0.38)., Conclusions: Although there were no adverse consequences on maternal mental health during the pandemic, there was a concerning increase in neonatal morbidity potentially due to the altered model of maternity care implemented in the early COVID-19 pandemic., (© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.)