Search

Perspective on this Article from Effects of Chlorophyll and Chlorophyllin on Low-Dose Aflatoxin B1 Pharmacokinetics in Human Volunteers

The highly selective, covalent Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor evobrutinib is under investigation for treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Early clinical studies in healthy participants and patients with relapsing MS indicated that evobrutinib is well‐tolerated and effective. We undertook a mass balance study in six men who received a single 75‐mg oral dose of evobrutinib containing ~ 3.6 MBq (100 μCi) 14C‐evobrutinib, to determine the absorption, metabolic pathways, and routes of excretion of evobrutinib. The primary objectives of this phase I study ({"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT03725072","term_id":"NCT03725072"}}NCT03725072) were to (1) determine the rates and routes of total radioactivity excretion, including the mass balance of total drug‐related radioactivity in urine and feces, (2) assess the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of total radioactivity in blood and plasma, and (3) characterize the plasma PKs of evobrutinib. Exploratory end points included identifying and quantifying evobrutinib and its metabolites in plasma and excreta (urine and feces) and exploring key biotransformation pathways and clearance mechanisms. Evobrutinib was primarily eliminated in feces (arithmetic mean percentage, SD, 71.0, 2.1) and, to a lesser extent, in urine (20.6, 2.0), with most of the total radioactivity (85.3%) excreted in the first 72 h after administration. No unchanged evobrutinib was detected in excreta. Evobrutinib was rapidly absorbed and substantially metabolized upon absorption. Only one major metabolite M463‐2 (MSC2430422) was identified in plasma above the 10% of total drug exposure threshold, which classifies M463‐2 (MSC2430422) as a major metabolite according to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA; metabolites in safety testing [MIST]) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA; International Conference on Harmonization [ICH] M3). These results support further development of evobrutinib and may help inform subsequent investigations.

AIMS SD-1077, a selectively deuterated precursor of dopamine (DA) structurally related to L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA), is under development for treatment of motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease. Preclinical models have shown slower metabolism of central deuterated DA. The present study investigated the peripheral pharmacokinetics (PK), metabolism and safety of SD-1077. METHODS Plasma and urine PK of drug and metabolites and safety after a single oral 150 mg SD-1077 dose were compared to 150 mg L-DOPA, each in combination with 37.5 mg carbidopa (CD) in a double-blind, two-period, crossover study in healthy volunteers (n = 16). RESULTS Geometric least squares mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% confidence intervals (90% CI) of SD-1077 vs. L-DOPA for Cmax , AUC0-t , and AUC0-inf were 88.4 (75.9-103.1), 89.5 (84.1-95.3), and 89.6 (84.2-95.4), respectively. Systemic exposure to DA was significantly higher after SD-1077/CD compared to that after L-DOPA/CD, with GMRs (90% CI) of 1.8 (1.45-2.24; P = 0.0005) and 2.06 (1.68-2.52; P

Food intake can alter the pharmacokinetics of certain medications, including changes in their oral bioavailability, which is of particular concern for extended-release (ER) opioids because of the high drug loads. Two randomized, open-label studies assessed the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of single and multiple doses of hydrocodone ER formulated with CIMA® Abuse-Deterrence Technology. Healthy subjects in fed and fasted states received single 90-mg doses of hydrocodone ER (Studies 1 and 2) or multiple doses of hydrocodone ER (45 mg twice daily on days 2–3, 60 mg twice daily on days 4–5, 90 mg twice daily on days 6–10, and 90 mg once in the morning on day 11) (Study 2). Naltrexone was administered to minimize opioid-related adverse events. Pharmacokinetic parameters included maximum hydrocodone plasma concentration (C max) and area under the concentration-versus-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0–∞) in Study 1 (day 1) and for one dosing interval at steady state (AUCτ,ss) in Study 2 (day 11). Before conducting the multiple-dose study, single-dose data were fitted with a population pharmacokinetic methodology. In total, 40 subjects were randomized to Study 1 and 43 subjects were randomized to Study 2. While overall exposure (AUC0–∞) was relatively similar (least squares mean ratio [90% CI]: 1.11 [1.06–1.16]), results indicated that the single-dose C max was 40% higher under fed versus fasted conditions (least squares mean ratio [90% CI]: 1.40 [1.31–1.51]; Study 1). Modeling of single-dose data predicted that the effect of food would be much less at steady state [predicted fed:fasted C max at steady state (C max,ss) and AUCτ,ss ratios of 1.18 and 1.09, respectively]. The multiple-dose study results validated these predicted ratios and indicated that the steady-state 90% CIs were within 0.80–1.25 for the fed:fasted C max,ss (1.14 [1.07–1.21]) and AUCτ,ss (1.11 [1.04–1.17]) parameters, indicating that clinically meaningful food effects at steady state are not expected. No evidence of an effect of food was found on the pharmacokinetics of hydrocodone ER after multiple days of twice-daily dosing.

Objective. To compare the oral abuse potential of hydrocodone extended-release (ER) tablet developed with CIMA® Abuse-Deterrence Technology with that of hydrocodone immediate release (IR). Design. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Setting and Patients. One study site in the United States; adult nondependent, recreational opioid users. Methods. After confirming their ability to tolerate and discriminate hydrocodone IR 45 mg from placebo, eligible participants were randomized to receive each of the following oral treatments once: finely crushed placebo, hydrocodone IR 45-mg powder, intact hydrocodone ER 45-mg tablet, and finely crushed hydrocodone ER 45-mg tablet. Primary pharmacodynamic measure was “at the moment” drug liking. Secondary measures included overall drug liking, drug effects (e.g., balance, positive, negative, sedative), pupillometry, pharmacokinetics, and safety. Results. Mean maximum effect (Emax) for “at the moment” drug liking was significantly lower for intact (53.9) and finely crushed hydrocodone ER (66.9) vs. hydrocodone IR (85.2; P

Two open-label, single-dose, parallel-group studies assessed effects of renal and hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of a hydrocodone extended-release (ER) formulation developed with the CIMA Abuse-Deterrence Technology platform. Forty-eight subjects with normal renal function or varying degrees of renal impairment received hydrocodone ER 45 mg (study 1); 16 subjects with normal hepatic function or moderate hepatic impairment received hydrocodone ER 15 mg (study 2). Blood samples were obtained predose and through 144 hours postdose. Mean maximum observed plasma hydrocodone concentration (Cmax ) in subjects with normal renal function, mild, moderate, and severe impairment, and end-stage renal disease was 28.6, 33.4, 42.4, 36.5, and 31.6 ng/mL, and mean area under the plasma hydrocodone concentration-versus-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞ ) was 565, 660, 973, 983, and 638 ng·h/mL, respectively. Incidence of adverse events was 57%, 38%, 44%, 33%, and 56%, respectively. Mean Cmax with normal hepatic function and moderate impairment was 10.1 and 13.0 ng/mL, and mean AUC0-∞ was 155 and 269 ng·h/mL, respectively. Incidence of adverse events was 38% in both groups. Altered systemic exposure in renally or hepatically impaired populations (up to ∼70% higher) should be considered when titrating to an effective dose of hydrocodone ER.

Background Greater drug content requirements for extended-release (ER) opioids necessitate greater protection against dose dumping. Hydrocodone ER employs the CIMA® Abuse-Deterrence Technology platform, which provides resistance against rapid release of the active moiety when the tablet is manipulated or taken with alcohol. Objective Assess effects of alcohol on hydrocodone ER pharmacokinetics. Study Design Open-label, crossover (January 25–April 30, 2010). Setting Single center. Participants Forty healthy adults. Intervention Subjects received all four treatments in a randomized manner (separated by a minimum 5-day washout): hydrocodone ER 15 mg with 240 mL water and 240 mL orange juice containing 4, 20, and 40 % alcohol in a fasted state. Naltrexone was administered to minimize opioid-related adverse events. Main Outcome Measure Effect of alcohol on pharmacokinetics of hydrocodone ER assessed by comparing systemic exposure [maximum plasma drug concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma drug concentration-versus-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0–∞)] after administration with alcohol or with water. Results Geometric means ratios of hydrocodone ER with 4, 20, and 40 % alcohol relative to water were 1.05, 1.09, and 1.14, respectively, for Cmax and 1.07, 1.13, and 1.17, respectively, for AUC0–∞. All 90 % confidence intervals for these geometric means ratios fell within the limits of 0.8 and 1.25. Increasing alcohol concentrations did not notably affect systemic exposure but were associated with increased adverse events. Conclusions Hydrocodone ER tablets were resistant to dose dumping when administered with alcohol in healthy subjects based on similar systemic exposures observed across all treatments.

A hydrocodone extended-release (ER) formulation employing the CIMA® Abuse-Deterrence Technology platform was developed to provide resistance against rapid release of hydrocodone when tablets are comminuted or taken with alcohol. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of three hydrocodone ER tablet prototypes with varying levels of polymer coating to identify the prototype expected to have the greatest abuse deterrence potential based on pharmacokinetic characteristics that maintain systemic exposure to hydrocodone comparable to that of a commercially available hydrocodone immediate-release (IR) product. In this four-period crossover study, healthy subjects aged 18–45 years were randomized to receive a single intact, oral 45-mg tablet of one of three hydrocodone ER prototypes (low-, intermediate-, or high-level coating) or an intact, oral tablet of hydrocodone IR/acetaminophen (APAP) 10/325 mg every 6 h until four tablets were administered, with each of the four treatments administered once over the four study periods. Dosing periods were separated by a minimum 5-day washout. Naltrexone 50 mg was administered to block opioid receptors. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic assessments were collected predose and through 72 h postdose. Parameters assessed included maximum observed plasma hydrocodone concentration (C max), time to C max (t max), and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0–∞). Mean C max values were 49.2, 32.6, and 28.4 ng/mL for the low-, intermediate-, and high-level coating hydrocodone ER tablet prototypes, respectively, and 37.3 ng/mL for the hydrocodone IR/APAP tablet; respective median t max values were 5.9, 8.0, 8.0, and 1.0 h. Total systemic exposure to hydrocodone (AUC0–∞) was comparable between hydrocodone ER tablet prototypes (640, 600, and 578 ng·h/mL, respectively) and hydrocodone IR/APAP (581 ng·h/mL). No serious adverse events or deaths were reported. The most common adverse events included headache (26 %) and nausea (18 %). All three hydrocodone ER tablet prototypes (low-, intermediate-, and high-level polymer coating) demonstrated ER pharmacokinetic characteristics. The hydrocodone ER tablet prototype with the high-level coating was selected for development because of its comparable exposure to the hydrocodone IR/APAP formulation and potentially increased ability to resist rapid drug release upon product tampering because of a higher polymer coating level. All study medications were well tolerated in healthy naltrexone-blocked volunteers.

Background: Fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT) is indicated for the treatment of breakthrough pain in patients who are already receiving, and who are tolerant to, opioid therapy for underlying, persistent cancer pain. Breakthrough pain may be severe or excruciating, and some patients may require high doses of rapid-onset opioids to obtain adequate analgesia. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the dose proportionality of FBT over a range of 600–1300 μg in healthy subjects. Methods: This was a randomized, open-label, four-period, crossover, single-centre study of FBT (Fentora®) conducted in healthy adult subjects who were not tolerant to opioids. The study included 120 men and women aged 18–45 years with a body mass index of 20–30 kg/m2 who had no clinically significant findings on medical and psychiatric histories, physical examination, ECG or standard clinical laboratory tests, and who had a negative urine screen for drugs and alcohol. Eligible subjects were randomized to one of four dose sequences: ABDC, BCAD, CDBA and DACB, where A, B, C and D were FBT doses from lowest to highest (600, 1000, 1200 and 1300 μg). Each dose of FBT was separated by a minimum of 7 days. Naltrexone 50 mg was administered to block the opioid receptor-mediated effects of fentanyl. Plasma fentanyl concentration was measured through 72 hours after placement of FBT. The main outcome measures, maximum plasma fentanyl concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma drug concentration versus time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC∞), were analysed to determine dose proportionality. Other pharmacokinetic parameters were also evaluated. Dose proportionality was concluded if the two-sided 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the slopes of the Cmax versus dose and AUC∞ versus dose curves were completely contained within the range of 0.711–1.289. The safety and tolerability of FBT were assessed throughout the study. Results: The slope for Cmax versus dose was 0.8627 (90% CI 0.7730, 0.9525), and the slope for AUC∞ versus dose was 0.9330 (90% CI 0.8738, 0.9922). Given that the CIs for Cmax and AUC∞ were within the predefined range of 0.711–1.289, dose proportionality was concluded over the 600–1300 μg range. The mean dose-normalized plasma fentanyl concentration reached 80% of Cmax within 25 minutes; plasma fentanyl concentration was maintained at this level for 3 hours after dose. No unexpected safety or tolerability concerns were noted in the naltrexone-blocked healthy subjects. Seventy-four subjects (68%) experienced adverse events (AEs); all were mild (56 [51%]) or moderate (18 [17%]). The most common AEs were nausea, dizziness and headache. No serious AEs were reported. Conclusion: The dose proportionality of FBT from 600–1300 μg was shown in healthy subjects. Based on the data, when FBT is titrated up to 1300 μg, a predictable and linear increase in systemic exposure can be expected. Currently, FBT is approved up to 800 μg. This study provides pharmacokinetic data to support a potential, expanded therapeutic dose range of FBT.

This study evaluated the pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of arsenic trioxide given twice per week in adult cancer patients with advanced malignancies and varying degrees of renal function. Patients received intravenous arsenic trioxide 0.15 mg/kg twice weekly for 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest period. The pharmacokinetic profiles of the pharmacologically active arsenical species, arsenious acid (AsIII), and its metabolites, monomethylarsonic acid (MMAV) and dimethylarsinic acid (DMAV), were evaluated during the first cycle for 72 h following doses on days 1 and 22. Safety assessments were made at each treatment visit. Twenty patients received an average of 11 doses. Compared with normal renal function, mild to severe renal impairment decreased urinary excretion of AsIII and increased exposure to MMAV and DMAV 1.4- to 8-fold after multiple dose administration. Only severe renal impairment substantially increased exposure to AsIII (AUC0–t increased by 18% after a single dose and 40% after multiple doses). The safety profile of arsenic trioxide after limited treatment on a twice-per-week schedule was comparable across all renal function groups. Renal impairment did increase the systemic exposure to arsenic and its methylated metabolites following standard daily dosing of arsenic trioxide. The data from the limited number of patients with severe renal dysfunction did not suggest that severe renal impairment affected the safety profile of arsenic trioxide in cancer patients who received limited treatment with arsenic trioxide.

This study assessed the absolute and relative bioavailabilities and transmucosal and gastrointestinal absorbency of fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT) and oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC). In a randomized crossover design, 26 healthy subjects received FBT 400 microg (transmucosal), FBT 800 microg (oral), OTFC 800 microg (transmucosal), and fentanyl 400 microg (intravenous). The transmucosal FBT had the highest absolute bioavailability (0.65) compared with the oral FBT (0.31) or transmucosal OTFC (0.47). More fentanyl was absorbed transmucosally from FBT than OTFC (48% vs 22%). Median t(max) values were shorter following the transmucosal FBT (47 minutes) than the oral FBT (90 minutes) or the transmucosal OTFC (91 minutes). Transmucosal administration of FBT compared with dose-normalized OTFC resulted in higher total systemic fentanyl exposure, higher early systemic exposure, and higher C(max). The rate and extent of fentanyl absorption were greater following administration of FBT compared to OTFC. An approximately 30% smaller dose of FBT achieved systemic exposures comparable to OTFC.

This open-label, crossover study evaluated the dose proportionality of a hydrocodone extended-release (ER) tablet employing the CIMA® Abuse-Deterrence Technology platform. Healthy volunteers were randomized to receive single doses of hydrocodone ER 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 mg separated by a minimum 14-day washout. Subjects received naltrexone to minimize opioid-related adverse events (AEs). Blood samples were collected for 72 h after each hydrocodone administration. Pharmacokinetic measures included maximum observed plasma hydrocodone concentration (C max) and area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC∞). Dose proportionality was concluded if the confidence interval (CI) of the slope of the regression line for C max and AUC∞ versus dose fell within 0.875–1.125. In total, 60 subjects were evaluable for pharmacokinetics. The mean C max was 12.6, 20.7, 30.3, 41.2, and 62.5 ng/mL and the mean AUC∞ was 199, 382, 592, 766, and 1189 ng·h/mL for hydrocodone ER 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 mg, respectively. C max and AUC∞ increased linearly with increasing dose. The 90 % CIs of the slope of the regression line for C max (0.880–0.922) and AUC∞ (0.984–1.026) indicated systemic exposure to hydrocodone increased in a dose-proportional manner. In these naltrexone-blocked subjects, no increased incidence of AEs was apparent with increasing dose. Hydrocodone exposure increased in a dose-proportional manner after administration of hydrocodone ER 15–90 mg tablets in healthy, naltrexone-blocked subjects.

Background : The fentanyl effervescent buccal tablet (FEBT) is designed to enhance the rate and extent of the absorption of fentanyl, an opioid, through the buccal mucosa. Objectives : The purposes of this study were to assess the dose proportionality of FEBT in healthy volunteers over the potential therapeutic dose range (100–800 μg) and characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of 4 doses (100, 200, 400, and 800 μg) of FEBT. Methods : This Phase I, randomized, open-label, 4-period crossover study was conducted at Radiant Research, Honolulu, Hawaii. Healthy adult volunteers with intolerance to opioids were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 4 single-dose sequences of FEBT: 100, 200, 400, and 800 μg (selected to encompass the anticipated therapeutic dose range), with each successive administration separated by a washout period of ≥7 days. Naltrexone hydrochloride (50-mg tablet) was administered-15 and 3 hours before and 9 hours after FEBT administration to block opioid receptor-mediated effects of fentanyl. Plasma fentanyl concentrations were measured from venous samples obtained over 72 hours after FEBT administration. Early fentanyl exposure was assessed using AUC from time 0 to 0.75 hour (the median T max of the reference dose [100 μg]) (AUC 0-Tmax′ ). Adverse events (AEs) were monitored and recorded throughout the study by medically qualified personnel. Results : Thirty-two subjects (26 men, 6 women; mean [SD] age, 29.3 [7.2] years [range, 19–44 years]; mean [SD] weight, 74.7 [10.7] kg) were enrolled. Median T was between 35 and 45 minutes after FEBT administration. AUC 0−∞ and C max increased approximately linearly with increasing doses of FEBT. Mean plasma fentanyl concentrations decreased from C max in a biexponential manner at the 100- and 200-μg doses and decreased in a triexponential manner at the 800-μg dose. Despite the triexponential decrease in the mean profile observed with the 400-μg dose, a biexponential decrease was observed in approximately half of the individual profiles. AUC 0−Tmax′ ranged from 0.09 ng · h/mL with the 100-μg dose to 0.52 ng · h/mL with the 800-μg dose. The most commonly reported AEs in the 100-, 200-, 400-, and 800-μg dose groups were as follows: application-site erythema, 3, 3, 4, and 3 subjects, respectively; nausea, 3, 2, 5, and 4 subjects; somnolence, 3, 2, 3, and 2 subjects; and headache, 3, 2, 1, and 4 subjects. None of the AEs were serious. Conclusions : In this study of the dose proportionality of FEBT in healthy volunteers, the PK profile of FEBT was characterized by a high early systemic exposure of fentanyl (0.09–0.52 ng · h/mL). Dose-dependent parameters (C max and AUC) increased in an approximately dose-proportional manner from 100 to 800 μg FEBT.

Thalidomide is a racemic glutamic acid derivative approved in the US for erythema nodosum leprosum, a complication of leprosy. In addition, its use in various inflammatory and oncologic conditions is being investigated. Thalidomide interconverts between the (R)- and (S)-enantiomers in plasma, with protein binding of 55% and 65%, respectively. More than 90% of the absorbed drug is excreted in the urine and faeces within 48 hours. Thalidomide is minimally metabolised by the liver, but is spontaneously hydrolysed into numerous renally excreted products. After a single oral dose of thalidomide 200mg (as the US-approved capsule formulation) in healthy volunteers, absorption is slow and extensive, resulting in a peak concentration (Cmax) of 1–2 mg/L at 3–4 hours after administration, absorption lag time of 30 minutes, total exposure (AUC∞) of 18 mg • h/L, apparent elimination half-life of 6 hours and apparent systemic clearance of 10 L/h. Thalidomide pharmacokinetics are best described by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. Because of the low solubility of the drug in the gastrointestinal tract, thalidomide exhibits absorption rate-limited pharmacokinetics (the ‘flip-flop’ phenomenon), with its elimination rate being faster than its absorption rate. The apparent elimination half-life of 6 hours therefore represents absorption, not elimination. The ‘true’ apparent volume of distribution was estimated to be 16L by use of the faster elimination-rate half-life. Multiple doses of thalidomide 200 mg/day over 21 days cause no change in the pharmacokinetics, with a steady-state Cmax (Css max) of 1.2 mg/L. Simulation of 400 and 800 mg/day also shows no accumulation, with Css max of 3.5 and 6.0 mg/L, respectively. Multiple-dose studies in cancer patients show pharmacokinetics comparable with those in healthy populations at similar dosages. Thalidomide exhibits a dose-proportional increase in AUC at doses from 50 to 400mg. Because of the low solubility of thalidomide, Cmax is less than proportional to dose, and tmax is prolonged with increasing dose. Age, sex and smoking have no effect on the pharmacokinetics of thalidomide, and the effect of food is minimal. Thalidomide does not alter the pharmacokinetics of oral contraceptives, and is also unlikely to interact with warfarin and grapefruit juice. Since thalidomide is mainly hydrolysed and passively excreted, its pharmacokinetics are not expected to change in patients with impaired liver or kidney function.

Purpose A hydrocodone extended-release (ER) formulation was developed to provide sustained pain relief with twice-daily dosing. Developed using the CIMA abuse-deterrence technology platform (CIMA Labs Inc, Brooklyn Park, Minnesota), this formulation also provides resistance against rapid release of hydrocodone when tablets are comminuted and resistance against dose dumping when tablets are taken with alcohol. Two open-label studies evaluated hydrocodone ER pharmacokinetics (PK) after single- and multiple-dose administration in healthy, naltrexone-blocked subjects. Methods In the single-dose period of both studies, healthy subjects aged 18 to 45 years of age received hydrocodone ER (study 1, 45 mg; study 2, 90 mg). In the multiple-dose period of study 1, subjects received one 45-mg hydrocodone ER tablet twice daily from the morning of day 1 through the morning of day 6. In the multiple-dose period of study 2, subjects received hydrocodone ER twice daily, titrated to 90 mg over 10 days (days 1 and 2, 45 mg; days 3 and 4, 60 mg; days 5–10, 90 mg). All subjects received naltrexone to block opioid receptors. Blood samples were collected pre-dose and through 72 hours post-dose in the single-dose period and after the final dose in the multiple-dose period. PK measures included maximum observed plasma drug concentration (C max ), area under the plasma drug concentration by time curve from time 0 to the time of the last measurable drug concentration (AUC 0–t ), time to C max (T max ), observed accumulation ratio (R obs ), and steady-state plasma concentration (C ss ). Safety and tolerability were assessed. Findings The PK analyses included 36 subjects from study 1 and 33 from study 2. Plasma hydrocodone PK parameters after single- and multiple-dose administration of hydrocodone ER 45 mg (study 1) were dose-normalized to 90 mg and pooled with data from study 2. As expected, C max was higher (125.4 vs 57.2 ng/mL), AUC 0–t was higher (2561 vs 1095 ng·h/mL), and T max occurred earlier (5.0 vs 8.0 hours) with multiple-dose administration. Mean R obs after multiple-dose administration of hydrocodone ER was also slightly higher than predicted from single-dose data (2.8 vs 2.4). C ss were achieved within 5 days of twice-daily administration of both doses. Mean fluctuation with hydrocodone ER 45 or 90 mg was 36.4% and 33.9%, respectively, and mean swing was 46.9% and 43.5%, respectively. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the single-dose (33%) and multiple-dose (29%) periods in study 1 and slightly higher in the multiple-dose (76%) than in the single-dose (53%) period in study 2. Implications The PK profile of hydrocodone ER was qualitatively similar after single- and multiple-dose administration. The steady-state profile demonstrated sustained exposure with limited swing and fluctuation. Single and multiple doses of hydrocodone ER (45 and 90 mg) were generally well tolerated in healthy subjects receiving naltrexone; however, exposure to naltrexone may have confounded the interpretation of safety findings.

Thalidomide is approved in the United States for treating erythema nodosum leprosum, a complication of leprosy. The present study determined the single-dose oral pharmacokinetics and dose proportionality from 50 to 400 mg of Celgene's commercial Thalomid thalidomide formulation in an open-label, single-dose, three-way crossover study. Fifteen healthy subjects were given 50, 200, and 400 mg of thalidomide on three occasions, and blood samples were collected over 48 hours. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using noncompartmental methods, and dose proportionality was assessed by linear regression of dose-normalized Cmax and AUC0-infinity. No serious or unexpected adverse events occurred. The most common adverse events were dizziness, somnolence, headache, and nausea. One patient was discontinued because of pharyngitis. There was a significant deviation from proportionality for Cmax with increases being less than proportional than changes in dose. AUC0-infinity increased proportionally with dose, suggesting that the overall amount of thalidomide absorbed, as well as its clearance, is independent of dose over the range used. V/F was found to increase with dose. This was most likely due to the terminal rate constant, which is used to calculate V/F, actually representing the absorption process rather than elimination (i.e., flip-flop phenomenon). The terminal rate constant (absorption rate constant) for the highest dose was 50% less than for the other two lower doses. The less than proportional increases in Cmax were most likely due to thalidomide's low aqueous solubility. Thalidomide shows reasonable dose proportionality with respect to AUC from 50 to 400 mg.

The fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT) is formulated to enhance the rate and extent of fentanyl absorption across the buccal mucosa. FBT is indicated for the management of breakthrough pain (a transient flare of pain on a background of chronic pain otherwise controlled by treatment with opioids) in patients with cancer who are already receiving and who are tolerant to opioid therapy for their underlying persistent cancer pain. This study assessed the bioequivalence of a single 400-microg dose of FBT following buccal (i.e. above a molar tooth between the upper gum and cheek) and sublingual (i.e. placed under the tongue) placement in order to provide an alternative option to patients.Healthy subjects were randomized to receive one FBT 400 microg buccally and sublingually (with naltrexone to minimize opioid effects) in an open-label, crossover design. Bioequivalence, as determined from the maximum plasma drug concentration (C(max)) and the area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC(infinity)), was established if the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the ratio of the means of sublingual/buccal values fell within the range of 0.80 to 1.25.Ninety subjects were enrolled (67 men, 23 women; median age 24 years), and 78 completed the study. The criteria for bioequivalence were met for both C(max) and AUC(infinity) for the two sites of tablet placement: sublingual/buccal ratio for C(max) = 0.868 (90% CI 0.815, 0.924); sublingual/buccal ratio for AUC(infinity) = 0.947 (90% CI 0.901, 0.995). Buccal and sublingual placement resulted in similar values for both AUC from time 0 to t(max') (AUC(tmax')), where t(max') is the median time to C(max) of a single 400-microg dose of FBT administered buccally (mean [SD]: 0.35 [0.16] ng . h/mL buccal; 0.35 [0.16] ng . h/mL sublingual) and for time to C(max) (median [range]: 0.75 [0.33-3.13] hours buccal; 0.78 [0.17-3.00] hours sublingual). FBT was generally well tolerated following placement at both sites in healthy volunteers administered naltrexone.The results of this study support sublingual FBT placement as a viable alternative to buccal placement in patients who may require an alternate administration site.

Patients with cancer, particularly those undergoing chemotherapy or radiotherapy, may develop oral mucositis. This is the first study to investigate the absorption profile of fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT) - an effervescent formulation of fentanyl indicated for the management of breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant cancer patients - in patients with or without oral mucositis.In this open-label study, patients with or without oral mucositis self-administered a single 200 microg dose of FBT by placing the tablet between the upper gum and cheek above a molar tooth. Venous blood samples for measurement of plasma fentanyl concentrations were collected at regular intervals up to 8 hours following FBT administration. Parameters of interest included maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), time to reach C(max) (t(max)), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 8 hours (AUC(8)), and AUC from time zero to the median t(max) (AUC(tmax)(')). Adverse events were monitored throughout the study. Oral mucosal examinations and measurements of vital signs were performed at intervals up to 8 hours following FBT administration.Sixteen patients, 8 with and 8 without oral mucositis, received FBT and completed the study. The severity of oral mucositis was mild in the patients exhibiting this condition. Median C(max) values were comparable: 1.14 ng/mL (range 0.26-2.69 ng/mL) in patients with mucositis, and 1.21 ng/mL (range 0.21-2.34 ng/mL) in patients without mucositis. The t(max) was not significantly different in the two groups: median t(max) was 25.0 min (range 15-45 min) in patients with mucositis and 22.5 min (range 10-121 min) in patients without mucositis. Median AUC(tmax') values were 0.17 ng . h/mL (range 0.04-0.52 ng . h/mL) in patients with mucositis, and 0.20 ng . h/mL (range 0.00-0.65 ng . h/mL) in patients without mucositis. The corresponding AUC(8) values were 2.05 ng . h/mL (range 1.16-3.83 ng . h/mL) and 1.55 ng . h/mL (range 0.74-3.07 ng . h/mL), respectively. FBT was generally well tolerated in this small group. No application site adverse events or changes in oral mucosal assessments were reported.The absorption profile of a single dose of FBT 200 microg was similar in patients with or without mild oral mucositis. The compound was generally well tolerated.