1. MRI as First Line Imaging for Suspected Acute Appendicitis during Pregnancy: Diagnostic Accuracy and level of Inter-Radiologist Agreement
- Author
-
Jon Williams, William Gourash, Balasubramanya Rangaswamy, Runjia Li, Goundappa K. Balasubramani, Jun Zhang, and Bestoun Ahmed
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,Article ,Diagnosis, Differential ,Cohen's kappa ,Pregnancy ,Positive predicative value ,Radiologists ,medicine ,Medical imaging ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Retrospective Studies ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Ultrasound ,Magnetic resonance imaging ,Retrospective cohort study ,Appendicitis ,medicine.disease ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Appendix ,Pregnancy Complications ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Acute Disease ,Female ,Radiology ,business - Abstract
Background Evaluation of acute appendicitis (AA) in pregnancy is supported with diagnostic imaging. Typically, ultrasound (US) is performed first, and then often followed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) due to continued diagnostic uncertainty. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of US as compared to MRI and to evaluate the inter-radiologist agreement amongst body Radiologists with varying levels of expertise. Methods We performed a retrospective study of 364 consecutive pregnant patients with clinical suspicion of AA at a single center over a 6-year period. Sensitivity, Specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values were calculated for US and MRI. Inter Radiologist agreement was determined using Cohen's Kappa analysis between original interpreting Radiologist and retrospective review by expert Radiologist. Results 31 of 364 patients (8.5%) underwent appendectomy based on preoperative diagnosis, with confirmation of acute appendicitis (AA) by pathology in 19. US was able to visualize the appendix in only 6 (1.65%), 5 of whom had appendicitis. 141 patients underwent MRI, and correctly diagnosed appendicitis in 9. No patient with a negative MRI diagnosis had AA. The sensitivity, and negative predictive value for diagnosing AA with MRI was 100%. The MRI inter-reader agreement for appendix visualization and overall accuracy were 87.9 and 98% with Cohen Kappa of 0.7 and 0.56 respectively. Conclusion Our data suggests that MRI should be considered the first line imaging modality in pregnant patients suspected of having AA. Body Radiologists with varied levels of experience in MRI readouts had substantial agreement.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF