Search

Important challenges in developing drugs that target central nervous system (CNS) tumors include overcoming barriers for CNS delivery and reducing systemic side effects. Alisertib, an aurora A kinase inhibitor, has been examined for treatment of several CNS tumors in preclinical and clinical studies. In this study, we investigated the distribution of alisertib into the CNS, the site of efficacy for brain tumors, and into the bone marrow, the site of dose-limiting toxicity leading to myelosuppression. Mechanisms influencing site-specific distribution, such as active transport mediated by the efflux proteins, p-glycoprotein (P-gp) and breast cancer resistance protein (Bcrp), were examined. Alisertib exposure to the brain in wild-type mice was less than 1% of that in the plasma, and was evenly distributed throughout various brain regions and the spinal cord. Studies using transporter knockout mice and pharmacological inhibition show that alisertib CNS distribution is influenced by P-gp, but not Bcrp. Conversely, upon systemic administration, alisertib distribution to the bone marrow occurred rapidly, was not significantly limited by efflux transporters, and reached higher concentrations than in the CNS. This study demonstrates that, given an equivalent distributional driving force exposure in plasma, the exposure of alisertib in the brain is significantly less than that in the bone marrow, suggesting that targeted delivery may be necessary to guarantee therapeutic efficacy with minimal risk for adverse events.Therefore, these data suggest that, to improve the therapeutic index when using alisertib for brain tumors, a localized regional delivery, such as convection-enhanced delivery, may be warranted. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The CNS penetration of alisertib is limited with uniform distribution in various regions of the brain, and P-gp efflux is an important mechanism limiting that CNS distribution. Alisertib rapidly distributes into the bone marrow, a site of toxicity, with a greater exposure than in the CNS, a possible site of efficacy. These results suggest a need to design localized delivery strategies to improve the CNS exposure of alisertib and limit systemic toxicities in the treatment of brain tumors.

Background Although the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a frequent oncogenic driver in glioblastoma (GBM), efforts to therapeutically target this protein have been largely unsuccessful. The present pre-clinical study evaluated the novel EGFR inhibitor WSD-0922. Methods We employed flank and orthotopic patient derived xenograft (PDX) models to characterize WSD-0922 and compare its efficacy to erlotinib, a potent EGFR inhibitor that failed to provide benefit for GBM patients. We performed long-term survival studies and collected short-term tumor, plasma, and whole-brain samples from mice treated with each drug. We utilized mass spectrometry to measure drug concentrations and spatial distribution and to assess the impact of each drug on receptor activity and cellular signaling networks. Results WSD-0922 inhibited EGFR signaling as effectively as erlotinib in in vitro and in vivo models. While WSD-0922 was more CNS penetrant than erlotinib in terms of total concentration, comparable concentrations of both drugs were measured at the tumor site in orthotopic models, and the concentration of free WSD-0922 in the brain was significantly less than the concentration of free erlotinib. WSD-0922 treatment provided a clear survival advantage compared to erlotinib in the GBM39 model, with marked suppression of tumor growth and most mice surviving until the end of the study. WSD-0922 treatment preferentially inhibited phosphorylation of several proteins, including those associated with EGFR inhibitor resistance and cell metabolism. Conclusions WSD-0922 is a highly potent inhibitor of EGFR in GBM, and warrants further evaluation in clinical studies.

Evaluation of sensitizing effects of TAL in GBM cell lines

Representative images of four dasatinib-treated murine brainstem gliomas in ABC KO and ABC WT mice (10X and 40X images).

PDF file, 71K, Pharmacokinetic Parameters in WT and TKO Mice after Oral Dosing with 15 mg/kg Dasatinib (Data presented as Mean � S.E. of Estimate).

Supplementary methods and Captions to the Supplementary Figures

Supplemental Figure 1. MALDI FTICR mass spectra selected from a pixel with maximum intensity in the MS images of liver (A) and flank tumor (B) sections showing the two first isotopes of rucaparib (peaks labelled 1 and 2, respectively). (C) MALDI FTICR mass spectrum selected from a pixel located in the orthotopic tumor area in the MS images of the brain section. No peak was detected for rucaparib. Black dotted lines in each H/E stained sister section delineate the MS images displayed in the figure. Supplemental Figure 2: Efficacy of rucaparib and temozolomide in orthotopic xenograft studies. Mice with established orthotopic xenografts from GBM14, GBM43 and GBM59 were randomized and treated with placebo, rucaparib 1 mg/kg/day, Days 1-5 every 28 days × 3 cycles, TMZ 50 mg/kg/day, Days 1-5 every 28 days × 3 cycles, or the combination.

Tesevatinib is a potent oral brain penetrant EGFR inhibitor currently being evaluated for glioblastoma therapy. Tesevatinib distribution was assessed in wild-type (WT) and Mdr1a/b(-/-)Bcrp(-/-) triple knockout (TKO) FVB mice after dosing orally or via osmotic minipump; drug–tissue binding was assessed by rapid equilibrium dialysis. Two hours after tesevatinib dosing, brain concentrations in WT and TKO mice were 0.72 and 10.03 μg/g, respectively. Brain-to-plasma ratios (Kp) were 0.53 and 5.73, respectively. With intraperitoneal infusion, brain concentrations were 1.46 and 30.6 μg/g (Kp 1.16 and 25.10), respectively. The brain-to-plasma unbound drug concentration ratios were substantially lower (WT mice, 0.03–0.08; TKO mice, 0.40–1.75). Unbound drug concentrations in brains of WT mice were 0.78 to 1.59 ng/g. In vitro cytotoxicity and EGFR pathway signaling were evaluated using EGFR-amplified patient-derived glioblastoma xenograft models (GBM12, GBM6). In vivo pharmacodynamics and efficacy were assessed using athymic nude mice bearing either intracranial or flank tumors treated by oral gavage. Tesevatinib potently reduced cell viability [IC50 GBM12 = 11 nmol/L (5.5 ng/mL), GBM6 = 102 nmol/L] and suppressed EGFR signaling in vitro. However, tesevatinib efficacy compared with vehicle in intracranial (GBM12, median survival: 23 vs. 18 days, P = 0.003) and flank models (GBM12, median time to outcome: 41 vs. 33 days, P = 0.007; GBM6, 44 vs. 33 days, P = 0.007) was modest and associated with partial inhibition of EGFR signaling. Overall, tesevatinib efficacy in EGFR-amplified PDX GBM models is robust in vitro but relatively modest in vivo, despite a high brain-to-plasma ratio. This discrepancy may be explained by drug-tissue binding and compensatory signaling.

In vivo efficacy of tesevatinib 70 mg/kg in PDX GBM models

Supplemental Figure Legends

Brain distribution of Elacridar in ABC KO and ABC WT is not significantly different.

Elacridar does not significantly impact dasatinib delivery in absence of ABCG2 and ABCB1

Graph depicting fold change of Abcg2, Abcb1a, and Abcb1b transcripts of nestin-expressing brainstem progenitors, ABC KO tumor cell-lines, and ABC WT tumor cell-lines

Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, including talazoparib, potentiate temozolomide efficacy in multiple tumor types; however, talazoparib-mediated sensitization has not been evaluated in orthotopic glioblastoma (GBM) models. This study evaluates talazoparib ± temozolomide in clinically relevant GBM models. Talazoparib at 1–3 nmol/L sensitized T98G, U251, and GBM12 cells to temozolomide, and enhanced DNA damage signaling and G2–M arrest in vitro. In vivo cyclical therapy with talazoparib (0.15 mg/kg twice daily) combined with low-dose temozolomide (5 mg/kg daily) was well tolerated. This talazoparib/temozolomide regimen prolonged tumor stasis more than temozolomide alone in heterotopic GBM12 xenografts [median time to endpoint: 76 days versus 50 days temozolomide (P = 0.005), 11 days placebo (P < 0.001)]. However, talazoparib/temozolomide did not accentuate survival beyond that of temozolomide alone in corresponding orthotopic xenografts [median survival 37 vs. 30 days with temozolomide (P = 0.93), 14 days with placebo, P < 0.001]. Average brain and plasma talazoparib concentrations at 2 hours after a single dose (0.15 mg/kg) were 0.49 ± 0.07 ng/g and 25.5±4.1 ng/mL, respectively. The brain/plasma distribution of talazoparib in Bcrp−/− versus wild-type (WT) mice did not differ, whereas the brain/plasma ratio in Mdr1a/b−/− mice was higher than WT mice (0.23 vs. 0.02, P < 0.001). Consistent with the in vivo brain distribution, overexpression of MDR1 decreased talazoparib accumulation in MDCKII cells. These results indicate that talazoparib has significant MDR1 efflux liability that may restrict delivery across the blood–brain barrier, and this may explain the loss of talazoparib-mediated temozolomide sensitization in orthotopic versus heterotopic GBM xenografts. Mol Cancer Ther; 16(12); 2735–46. ©2017 AACR.

Fig. S1: MDM2 transcript expression. RNA extracted from flank tumor xenografts from 51 PDX models was assessed by qRT-PCR for MDM2 expression in pooled triplicate samples and compared to expression in normal brain (NB). Fig. S2: MDM2 Amplification in PDX lines. Copy-number profiles were generated from whole exome sequencing of flank xenografts. MDM2 exons are highlighted in red. GBM10, GBM12, and GBM102 show normal MDM2 copy number. GBM108 and GBM143 demonstrate high-level amplification of MDM2. Fig. S3: Apoptosis by TUNEL assay in GBM108. Established flank tumor xenografts were randomized and treated for 5 days with placebo (n=5 mice) versus 50 mg/kg SAR405838 (n=5 mice). Tumor samples were then processed for TUNEL staining. TUNEL-positive cells were quantitated in six high-powered fields (HPF) for each sample. Results are plotted as mean and standard error of the mean. * P

The importance of the blood–brain barrier in preventing effective pharmacotherapy of glioblastoma has been controversial. The controversy stems from the fact that vascular endothelial cell tight junctions are disrupted in the tumor, allowing some systemic drug delivery. P-glycoprotein (Pgp) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) efflux drugs from brain capillary endothelial cells into the blood. We tested the hypothesis that although the tight junctions are “leaky” in the core of glioblastomas, active efflux limits drug delivery to tumor-infiltrated normal brain and consequently, treatment efficacy. Malignant gliomas were induced by oncogene transfer into wild-type (WT) mice or mice deficient for Pgp and BCRP (knockout, KO). Glioma-bearing mice were orally dosed with dasatinib, a kinase inhibitor and dual BCRP/PgP substrate that is being currently tested in clinical trials. KO mice treated with dasatinib survived for twice as long as WT mice. Microdissection of the tumor core, invasive rim, and normal brain revealed 2- to 3-fold enhancement in dasatinib brain concentrations in KO mice relative to WT. Analysis of signaling showed that poor drug delivery correlated with the lack of inhibition of a dasatinib target, especially in normal brain. A majority of human glioma xenograft lines tested expressed BCRP or PgP and were sensitized to dasatinib by a dual BCRP/Pgp inhibitor, illustrating a second barrier to drug delivery intrinsic to the tumor itself. These data show that active efflux is a relevant obstacle to treating glioblastoma and provide a plausible mechanistic basis for the clinical failure of numerous drugs that are BCRP/Pgp substrates. Mol Cancer Ther; 11(10); 2183–92. ©2012 AACR.

Controversy exists surrounding whether heterogeneous disruption of the blood–brain barrier (BBB), as seen in glioblastoma (GBM), leads to adequate drug delivery sufficient for efficacy in GBM. This question is especially important when using potent, targeted agents that have a poor penetration across an intact BBB. Efficacy of the murine double minute-2 (MDM2) inhibitor SAR405838 was tested in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of GBM. In vitro efficacy of SAR405838 was evaluated in PDX models with varying MDM2 expression and those with high (GBM108) and low (GBM102) expression were evaluated for flank and orthotopic efficacy. BBB permeability, evaluated using TexasRed-3 kDa dextran, was significantly increased in GBM108 through VEGFA overexpression. Drug delivery, MRI, and orthotopic survival were compared between BBB-intact (GBM108-vector) and BBB-disrupted (GBM108-VEGFA) models. MDM2-amplified PDX lines with high MDM2 expression were sensitive to SAR405838 in comparison with MDM2 control lines in both in vitro and heterotopic models. In contrast with profound efficacy observed in flank xenografts, SAR405838 was ineffective in orthotopic tumors. Although both GBM108-vector and GBM108-VEGFA readily imaged on MRI following gadolinium contrast administration, GBM108-VEGFA tumors had a significantly enhanced drug and gadolinium accumulation, as determined by MALDI-MSI. Enhanced drug delivery in GBM108-VEGFA translated into a marked improvement in orthotopic efficacy. This study clearly shows that limited drug distribution across a partially intact BBB may limit the efficacy of targeted agents in GBM. Brain penetration of targeted agents is a critical consideration in any precision medicine strategy for GBM. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(9); 1893–901. ©2018 AACR.

Schematic of the survival study including a cartoon demonstrating the methodology for tumor generation

Supplementary Figure S5. MALDI-TOF MS analyses of MK-1775 (m/z 501.2)in brain and flank GBM22 tumor samples after treatment with placebo or MK-1775

Supplementary Methods and Legend

Heatmap of mRNA sequencing data, highlighting the activated genes within pathways for glycolysis.

Purpose: Wee1 regulates key DNA damage checkpoints, and in this study, the efficacy of the Wee1 inhibitor MK-1775 was evaluated in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) xenograft models alone and in combination with radiation and/or temozolomide.Experimental Design: In vitro MK-1775 efficacy alone and in combination with temozolomide, and the impact on DNA damage, was analyzed by Western blotting and γH2AX foci formation. In vivo efficacy was evaluated in orthotopic and heterotopic xenografts. Drug distribution was assessed by conventional mass spectrometry (MS) and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI)-MS imaging.Results: GBM22 (IC50 = 68 nmol/L) was significantly more sensitive to MK-1775 compared with five other GBM xenograft lines, including GBM6 (IC50 >300 nmol/L), and this was associated with a significant difference in pan-nuclear γH2AX staining between treated GBM22 (81% cells positive) and GBM6 (20% cells positive) cells. However, there was no sensitizing effect of MK-1775 when combined with temozolomide in vitro. In an orthotopic GBM22 model, MK-1775 was ineffective when combined with temozolomide, whereas in a flank model of GBM22, MK-1775 exhibited both single-agent and combinatorial activity with temozolomide. Consistent with limited drug delivery into orthotopic tumors, the normal brain to whole blood ratio following a single MK-1775 dose was 5%, and MALDI-MS imaging demonstrated heterogeneous and markedly lower MK-1775 distribution in orthotopic as compared with heterotopic GBM22 tumors.Conclusions: Limited distribution to brain tumors may limit the efficacy of MK-1775 in GBM. Clin Cancer Res; 21(8); 1916–24. ©2015 AACR.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is increasingly recognized as a disease involving dysfunctional cellular metabolism. GBMs are known to be complex heterogeneous systems containing multiple distinct cell populations and are supported by an aberrant network of blood vessels. A better understanding of GBM metabolism, its variation with respect to the tumor microenvironment, and resulting regional changes in chemical composition is required. This may shed light on the observed heterogeneous drug distribution, which cannot be fully described by limited or uneven disruption of the blood–brain barrier. In this work, we used mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) to map metabolites and lipids in patient-derived xenograft models of GBM. A data analysis workflow revealed that distinctive spectral signatures were detected from different regions of the intracranial tumor model. A series of long-chain acylcarnitines were identified and detected with increased intensity at the tumor edge. A 3D MSI dataset demonstrated that these molecules were observed throughout the entire tumor/normal interface and were not confined to a single plane. mRNA sequencing demonstrated that hallmark genes related to fatty acid metabolism were highly expressed in samples with higher acylcarnitine content. These data suggest that cells in the core and the edge of the tumor undergo different fatty acid metabolism, resulting in different chemical environments within the tumor. This may influence drug distribution through changes in tissue drug affinity or transport and constitute an important consideration for therapeutic strategies in the treatment of GBM.Significance:GBM tumors exhibit a metabolic gradient that should be taken into consideration when designing therapeutic strategies for treatment.See related commentary by Tan and Weljie, p. 1231

Heatmap of mRNA sequencing data, highlighting the activated genes within pathways for fatty acid metabolism.

Annotated peaklists from MALDI FT ICR MSI data, including measured m/z, possible identification according to Lipid Maps database and associated Δppm.

Supplementary results, Supplementary figures S1-S9 and Supplementary methods.

Cytotoxic effects of chemotherapy and radiation therapy (RT) used for the treatment of brain metastases results from DNA damage within cancer cells. Cells rely on highly evolved DNA damage response (DDR) pathways to repair the damage caused by these treatments. Inhibiting these repair pathways can further sensitize cancer cells to chemotherapy and RT. The catalytic subunit of DNA-dependent protein kinase, in a complex with Ku80 and Ku70, is a pivotal regulator of the DDR, and peposertib is a potent inhibitor of this catalytic subunit. The characterization of central nervous system (CNS) distributional kinetics of peposertib is critical in establishing a therapeutic index in the setting of brain metastases. Our studies demonstrate that the delivery of peposertib is severely restricted into the CNS as opposed to peripheral organs, by active efflux at the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Peposertib has a low free fraction in the brain and spinal cord, further reducing the active concentration, and distributes to the same degree within different anatomic regions of the brain. However, peposertib is heterogeneously distributed within the metastatic tumor, where its concentration is highest within the tumor core (with disrupted BBB) and substantially lower within the invasive tumor rim (with a relatively intact BBB) and surrounding normal brain. These findings are critical in guiding the potential clinical deployment of peposertib as a radiosensitizing agent for the safe and effective treatment of brain metastases. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Effective radiosensitization of brain metastases while avoiding toxicity to the surrounding brain is critical in the development of novel radiosensitizers. The central nervous system distribution of peposertib, a potent catalytic subunit of DNA-dependent protein kinase inhibitor, is restricted by active efflux in the normal blood-brain barrier (BBB) but can reach significant concentrations in the tumor core. This finding suggests that peposertib may be an effective radiosensitizer for intracranial tumors with an open BBB, while limited distribution into normal brain will decrease the risk of enhanced radiation injury.

Background H3K27-altered diffuse midline glioma (DMG) is the deadliest pediatric brain tumor; despite intensive research efforts, every clinical trial to date has failed. Is this because we are choosing the wrong drugs? Or are drug delivery and other pharmacokinetic variables at play? We hypothesize that the answer is likely a combination, where optimization may result in a much needed novel therapeutic approach. Methods We used in vitro drug screening, patient samples, and shRNA knockdown models to identify an upregulated target in DMG. A single small molecule protein kinase inhibitor with translational potential was selected for systemic and direct, loco-regional delivery to patient-derived xenografts (PDX) and genetically engineered mouse models (GEMM). Pharmacokinetic studies were conducted in non-tumor bearing rats. Results Aurora kinase (AK) inhibitors demonstrated strong antitumor effects in DMG drug screens. Additional in vitro studies corroborated the importance of AK to DMG survival. Systemic delivery of alisertib showed promise in subcutaneous PDX but not intracranial GEMM and PDX models. Repeated loco-regional drug administration into the tumor through convection-enhanced delivery (CED) was equally inefficacious, and pharmacokinetic studies revealed rapid clearance of alisertib from the brain. In an effort to increase the drug to tumor residence time, continuous CED over 7 days improved drug retention in the rodent brainstem and significantly extended survival in both orthotopic PDXs and GEMMs. Conclusions These studies provide evidence for increasing drug-tumor residence time of promising targeted therapies via extended CED as a valuable treatment strategy for DMG.

Background EGFR targeting antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are highly effective against EGFR-amplified tumors, but poor distribution across the blood–brain barrier (BBB) limits their efficacy in glioblastoma (GBM) when administered systemically. We studied whether convection-enhanced delivery (CED) can be used to safely infuse ADCs into orthotopic patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of EGFRvIII mutant GBM. Methods The efficacy of the EGFR-targeted ADCs depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M) and Serclutamab talirine (Ser-T) was evaluated in vitro and in vivo. CED was performed in nontumor and tumor-bearing mice. Immunostaining was used to evaluate ADC distribution, pharmacodynamic effects, and normal cell toxicity. Results Dose-finding studies in orthotopic GBM6 identified single infusion of 2 μg Ser-T and 60 μg Depatux-M as safe and effective associated with extended survival prolongation (>300 days and 95 days, respectively). However, with serial infusions every 21 days, four Ser-T doses controlled tumor growth but was associated with lethal toxicity approximately 7 days after the final infusion. Limiting dosing to two infusions in GBM108 provided profound median survival extension of over 200 days. In contrast, four Depatux-M CED doses were well tolerated and significantly extended survival in both GBM6 (158 days) and GBM108 (310 days). In a toxicity analysis, Ser-T resulted in a profound loss in NeuN+ cells and markedly elevated GFAP staining, while Depatux-M was associated only with modest elevation in GFAP staining. Conclusion CED of Depatux-M is well tolerated and results in extended survival in orthotopic GBM PDXs. In contrast, CED of Ser-T was associated with a much narrower therapeutic window.

The objective of this research was to characterize the impact of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on the pharmacokinetic properties of the pro-drug lisdexamfetamine and its active metabolite, d-amphetamine. A case-control design was used where patients who had undergone RYGB 9–24 months prior were matched on sex, age, and body mass index (BMI) to nonsurgical controls who had no history of weight loss surgery. Each participant received a single 50 mg dose of lisdexamfetamine, and plasma samples were collected over a 24-h period following dosing. Noncompartmental analyses were used to compare pharmacokinetic measures between groups. There were no significant differences between the RYGB (n = 10) and NSC groups (n = 10) on sex (70% female), age (40.9 ± 9.6 vs. 41.3 ± 8.9 years), BMI (30.3 ± 5.2 vs. 31 ± 5.9 kg/m2), or ethnicity (100% vs. 80% White). The pharmacokinetic parameters between the RYGB and NCS groups were found to be equivalent for lisdexamfetamine and d-amphetamine, including maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax), and area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC(0–∞)). These data suggest that there is no need to routinely adjust lisdexamfetamine dosing following RYGB. However, given the potential for inter-individual differences, patients who undergo RYGB should be clinically monitored and individualized dosing strategies should be considered for concerns surrounding efficacy or toxicity.

Background Glioblastoma (GBM) is an incurable disease with few approved therapeutic interventions. Radiation therapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) remain the standards of care. The efficacy and optimal deployment schedule of the orally bioavailable small-molecule tumor checkpoint controller lisavanbulin alone, and in combination with, standards of care were assessed using a panel of IDH-wildtype GBM patient-derived xenografts. Methods Mice bearing intracranial tumors received lisavanbulin +/−RT +/−TMZ and followed for survival. Lisavanbulin concentrations in plasma and brain were determined by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, while flow cytometry was used for cell cycle analysis. Results Lisavanbulin monotherapy showed significant benefit (P < .01) in 9 of 14 PDXs tested (median survival extension 9%-84%) and brain-to-plasma ratios of 1.3 and 1.6 at 2- and 6-hours postdose, respectively, validating previous data suggesting significant exposure in the brain. Prolonged lisavanbulin dosing from RT start until moribund was required for maximal benefit (GBM6: median survival lisavanbulin/RT 90 vs. RT alone 69 days, P = .0001; GBM150: lisavanbulin/RT 143 days vs. RT alone 73 days, P = .06). Similar observations were seen with RT/TMZ combinations (GBM39: RT/TMZ/lisavanbulin 502 days vs. RT/TMZ 249 days, P = .0001; GBM26: RT/TMZ/lisavanbulin 172 days vs. RT/TMZ 121 days, P = .04). Immunohistochemical analyses showed a significant increase in phospho-histone H3 with lisavanbulin treatment (P = .01). Conclusions Lisavanbulin demonstrated excellent brain penetration, significant extension of survival alone or in RT or RT/TMZ combinations, and was associated with mitotic arrest. These data provide a strong clinical rationale for testing lisavanbulin in combination with RT or RT/TMZ in GBM patients.

Tesevatinib is a potent oral brain penetrant EGFR inhibitor currently being evaluated for glioblastoma therapy. Tesevatinib distribution was assessed in wild-type (WT) and Mdr1a/b(-/-)Bcrp(-/-) triple knockout (TKO) FVB mice after dosing orally or via osmotic minipump; drug–tissue binding was assessed by rapid equilibrium dialysis. Two hours after tesevatinib dosing, brain concentrations in WT and TKO mice were 0.72 and 10.03 μg/g, respectively. Brain-to-plasma ratios (Kp) were 0.53 and 5.73, respectively. With intraperitoneal infusion, brain concentrations were 1.46 and 30.6 μg/g (Kp 1.16 and 25.10), respectively. The brain-to-plasma unbound drug concentration ratios were substantially lower (WT mice, 0.03–0.08; TKO mice, 0.40–1.75). Unbound drug concentrations in brains of WT mice were 0.78 to 1.59 ng/g. In vitro cytotoxicity and EGFR pathway signaling were evaluated using EGFR-amplified patient-derived glioblastoma xenograft models (GBM12, GBM6). In vivo pharmacodynamics and efficacy were assessed using athymic nude mice bearing either intracranial or flank tumors treated by oral gavage. Tesevatinib potently reduced cell viability [IC50 GBM12 = 11 nmol/L (5.5 ng/mL), GBM6 = 102 nmol/L] and suppressed EGFR signaling in vitro. However, tesevatinib efficacy compared with vehicle in intracranial (GBM12, median survival: 23 vs. 18 days, P = 0.003) and flank models (GBM12, median time to outcome: 41 vs. 33 days, P = 0.007; GBM6, 44 vs. 33 days, P = 0.007) was modest and associated with partial inhibition of EGFR signaling. Overall, tesevatinib efficacy in EGFR-amplified PDX GBM models is robust in vitro but relatively modest in vivo, despite a high brain-to-plasma ratio. This discrepancy may be explained by drug-tissue binding and compensatory signaling.

Brain tumors, whether primary or secondary, have limited therapeutic options despite advances in understanding driver gene mutations and heterogeneity within tumor cells. The cellular and molecular composition of brain tumor stroma, an important modifier of tumor growth, has been less investigated to date. Only few studies have focused on the vasculature of human brain tumors despite the fact that the blood-brain barrier (BBB) represents the major obstacle for efficient drug delivery.In this study, we employed RNA sequencing to characterize transcriptional alterations of endothelial cells (EC) isolated from primary and secondary human brain tumors. We used an immunoprecipitation approach to enrich for EC from normal brain, glioblastoma (GBM), and lung cancer brain metastasis (BM).Analysis of the endothelial transcriptome showed deregulation of genes implicated in cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) in the vasculature of GBM and BM. Deregulation of genes defining the BBB dysfunction module was found in both tumor types. We identified deregulated expression of genes in vessel-associated fibroblasts in GBM.We characterize alterations in BBB genes in GBM and BM vasculature and identify proteins that might be exploited for developing drug delivery platforms. In addition, our analysis on vessel-associated fibroblasts in GBM shows that the cellular composition of brain tumor stroma merits further investigation.

Effective drug delivery to the brain is critical for the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM), an aggressive and invasive primary brain tumor that has a dismal prognosis. Radiation therapy, the mainstay of brain tumor treatment, works by inducing DNA damage. Therefore, inhibiting DNA damage response (DDR) pathways can sensitize tumor cells to radiation and enhance cytotoxicity. AZD1390 is an inhibitor of ataxia-telangiectasia mutated kinase, a critical regulator of DDR. Our in vivo studies in the mouse indicate that delivery of AZD1390 to the central nervous system (CNS) is restricted due to active efflux by P-glycoprotein (P-gp). The free fraction of AZD1390 in brain and spinal cord were found to be low, thereby reducing the partitioning of free drug to these organs. Coadministration of an efflux inhibitor significantly increased CNS exposure of AZD1390. No differences were observed in distribution of AZD1390 within different anatomic regions of CNS, and the functional activity of P-gp and breast cancer resistance protein also remained the same across brain regions. In an intracranial GBM patient-derived xenograft model, AZD1390 accumulation was higher in the tumor core and rim compared with surrounding brain. Despite this heterogenous delivery within tumor-bearing brain, AZD1390 concentrations in normal brain, tumor rim, and tumor core were above in vitro effective radiosensitizing concentrations. These results indicate that despite being a substrate of efflux in the mouse brain, sufficient AZD1390 exposure is anticipated even in regions of normal brain. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Given the invasive nature of glioblastoma (GBM), tumor cells are often protected by an intact blood-brain barrier, requiring the development of brain-penetrant molecules for effective treatment. We show that efflux mediated by P-glycoprotein (P-gp) limits central nervous system (CNS) distribution of AZD1390 and that there are no distributional differences within anatomical regions of CNS. Despite efflux by P-gp, concentrations effective for potent radiosensitization are achieved in GBM tumor-bearing mouse brains, indicating that AZD1390 is an attractive molecule for clinical development of brain tumors.

OBJECTIVEChemotherapy infusions directly into the fourth ventricle may play a role in treating malignant fourth-ventricular tumors. This study tested the safety and pharmacokinetics of short-term and long-term administration of MTX110 (soluble panobinostat; Midatech Pharma) into the fourth ventricle of nonhuman primates.METHODSFour rhesus macaque monkeys underwent posterior fossa craniectomy and catheter insertion into the fourth ventricle. In group I (n = 2), catheters were externalized and lumbar drain catheters were placed simultaneously to assess CSF distribution after short-term infusions. MTX110 (0.5 ml of 300 μM panobinostat solution) was infused into the fourth ventricle daily for 5 consecutive days. Serial CSF and serum panobinostat levels were measured. In group II (n = 2), fourth-ventricle catheters were connected to a subcutaneously placed port for subsequent long-term infusions. Four cycles of MTX110, each consisting of 5 daily infusions (0.5 ml of 300 μM panobinostat solution), were administered over 8 weeks. Animals underwent detailed neurological evaluations, MRI scans, and postmortem histological analyses.RESULTSNo neurological deficits occurred after intraventricular MTX110 infusions. MRI scans showed catheter placement within the fourth ventricle in all 4 animals, with extension to the cerebral aqueduct in 1 animal and into the third ventricle in 1 animal. There were no MRI signal changes in the brainstem, cerebellum, or elsewhere in the brains of any of the animals. Histologically, normal brain cytoarchitecture was preserved with only focal mild postsurgical changes in all animals. Panobinostat was undetectable in serum samples collected 2 and 4 hours after infusions in all samples in both groups. In group I, the mean peak panobinostat level in the fourth-ventricle CSF (6242 ng/ml) was significantly higher than that in the lumbar CSF (9 ng/ml; p < 0.0001). In group II, the mean peak CSF panobinostat level (11,042 ng/ml) was significantly higher than the mean trough CSF panobinostat level (33 ng/ml; p < 0.0001).CONCLUSIONSMTX110 can be safely infused into the fourth ventricle in nonhuman primates at supratherapeutic doses. Postinfusion CSF panobinostat levels peak immediately in the fourth ventricle and then rapidly decrease over 24 hours. Panobinostat is detectable at low levels in CSF measured from the lumbar cistern up to 4 hours after infusions. These results will provide background data for a pilot clinical trial in patients with recurrent medulloblastoma.

Glioblastoma, the most lethal primary brain cancer, is extremely proliferative and invasive. Tumor cells at tumor/brain-interface often exist behind a functionally intact blood-brain barrier (BBB), and so are shielded from exposure to therapeutic drug concentrations. An ideal glioblastoma treatment needs to engage targets that drive proliferation as well as invasion, with brain penetrant therapies. One such target is the mitotic kinesin KIF11, which can be inhibited with ispinesib, a potent molecularly-targeted drug. Although, achieving durable brain exposures of ispinesib is critical for adequate tumor cell engagement during mitosis, when tumor cells are vulnerable, for efficacy. Our results demonstrate that the delivery of ispinesib is restricted by P-gp and Bcrp efflux at BBB. Thereby, ispinesib distribution is heterogeneous with concentrations substantially lower in invasive tumor rim (intact BBB) compared to glioblastoma core (disrupted BBB). We further find that elacridar—a P-gp and Bcrp inhibitor—improves brain accumulation of ispinesib, resulting in remarkably reduced tumor growth and extended survival in a rodent model of glioblastoma. Such observations show the benefits and feasibility of pairing a potentially ideal treatment with a compound that improves its brain accumulation, and supports use of this strategy in clinical exploration of cell cycle-targeting therapies in brain cancers.

Brain tumours have a poor prognosis and lack effective treatments. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) represents a major hurdle to drug delivery to brain tumours. In some locations in the tumour, the BBB may be disrupted to form the blood-brain tumour barrier (BBTB). This leaky BBTB enables diagnosis of brain tumours by contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; however, this disruption is heterogeneous throughout the tumour. Thus, relying on the disrupted BBTB for achieving effective drug concentrations in brain tumours has met with little clinical success. Because of this, it would be beneficial to design drugs and drug delivery strategies to overcome the 'normal' BBB to effectively treat the brain tumours. In this review, we discuss the role of BBB/BBTB in brain tumour diagnosis and treatment highlighting the heterogeneity of the BBTB. We also discuss various strategies to improve drug delivery across the BBB/BBTB to treat both primary and metastatic brain tumours. Recognizing that the BBB represents a critical determinant of drug efficacy in central nervous system tumours will allow a more rapid translation from basic science to clinical application. A more complete understanding of the factors, such as BBB-limited drug delivery, that have hindered progress in treating both primary and metastatic brain tumours, is necessary to develop more effective therapies.

The effective treatment of brain tumors is a considerable challenge in part because of the presence of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) that limits drug delivery. Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is an aggressive and infiltrative primary brain tumor with an extremely poor prognosis after standard-of-care therapy with surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and chemotherapy. DNA damage response (DDR) pathways play a critical role in DNA repair in cancer cells, and inhibition of these pathways can potentially augment RT and chemotherapy tumor cell toxicity. The ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR) kinase is a key regulator of the DDR network and is potently and selectively inhibited by the ATR inhibitor berzosertib. Although in vitro studies demonstrate a synergistic effect of berzosertib in combination with temozolomide, in vivo efficacy studies have yet to recapitulate this observation using intracranial tumor models. In the current study, we demonstrate that delivery of berzosertib to the brain is restricted by efflux at the BBB. Berzosertib has a high binding affinity to brain tissue compared with plasma, thereby leading to low free drug concentrations in the brain. Berzosertib distribution is heterogenous within the tumor, wherein concentrations are substantially lower in normal brain and invasive tumor rim (wherein the BBB is intact) when compared with those in the tumor core (wherein the BBB is leaky). These results demonstrate that high tissue binding and limited and heterogenous brain distribution of berzosertib may be important factors that influence the efficacy of berzosertib therapy in GBM. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This study examined the brain delivery and efficacy of berzosertib in patient-derived xenograft models of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Berzosertib is actively effluxed at the blood-brain barrier and is highly bound to brain tissue, leading to low free drug concentrations in the brain. Berzosertib is heterogeneously distributed into different regions of the brain and tumor and, in this study, was not efficacious in vivo when combined with temozolomide. These factors inform the future clinical utility of berzosertib for GBM.

BACKGROUND Diffuse midline gliomas (DMGs) harboring the H3K27M mutation are highly aggressive, fatal brainstem tumors that primarily occur in children. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) prevents numerous drugs from reaching CNS tumors, like DMG, at cytotoxic concentrations. Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) has emerged as a drug delivery technique that bypasses the BBB through a direct interstitial infusion under a pressure gradient. However, drug distribution and clearance from the brain following CED is poorly understood and has been cited as a potential reason for the lack of efficacy observed in prior clinical trials. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to understand how two small molecule inhibitors (alisertib, ponatinib) that inhibit cell growth and proliferation in DMG cells in vitro distribute and clear from the brain following CED to the brainstem. METHODS Sprague-dawley rats underwent a single 60mL CED infusion of drug to the brainstem (200mM alisertib, 10mM ponatinib) and were sacrificed 0.083, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 24 hours following the completion of the infusion. Brains were dissected and drug concentration was determined via HPLC analysis. RESULTS No rats showed any clinical or neurological signs of toxicity post-infusion. Both drugs showed significant differences in drug concentration based on anatomical brain region where higher concentrations were observed in the pons and cerebellum compared to the cortex. Drug half-life in the brain was ~0.5 hours for alisertib and ~1 hour for ponatinib, but this was not significantly increased following co-administration of elacridar, a BBB efflux pump inhibitor. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that elimination of drugs from the brain in a complex, multifactorial mechanism that warrants further preclinical investigation prior to the initiation of a clinical trial.

While the allure of targeted therapies in oncology has been their high degree of specificity and potency for key tumor drivers, they have been disappointing in glioblastoma (GBM), even for drugs that are blood brain barrier permeable and CNS retained. This point is highlighted by the experience with mitotic spindle inhibitors, drugs which block the G2M transition and induce mitotic catastrophe—a phenotype characterized by cell enlargement and polyploidy that leads to apoptotic cell death. We have shown that one of these, a potent inhibitor of the mitotic kinesin Kif11 (ispinesib), is highly active against GBM tumor initiating cells and prolongs survival in murine models of this disease. However, tumors eventually progress, reflecting the development of drug resistance. Although ispinesib resistant GBM cells develop mitotic catastrophe, they become highly resistant to the apoptosis that typically follows and continue to proliferate. We find that this apoptosis resistance requires phosphorylation of the transcription factor STAT3 at two residues—Y705 and S727. Phosphorylation of Y705, mediated by SRC kinase, translocates STAT3 to the nucleus where it induces transcription of anti-apoptotic proteins. Phosphorylation at S727, mediated by EGFR, translocates STAT3 to the mitochondria where it blocks release of cytochrome c—the penultimate effector in apoptosis. Simultaneously inhibiting both SRC and EGFR with FDA-approved, CNS permeant inhibitors reverses this resistance and significantly prolongs survival in ispinesib-treated GBM-bearing mice. Furthermore, we find that resistance to several other mitotic inhibitors also utilizes this STAT3-driven mechanism and can likewise be reversed with combined EGFR and SRC inhibition. Thus, our work demonstrates how a promising therapeutic approach, which has been disappointing in GBM, can in fact be rendered effective by anticipating and prospectively treating ab initio the mechanism that drives treatment resistance.

The treatment of brain tumors using chemo- and radio-sensitizers may be limited by a lack of effective drug delivery. Radiation and some cytotoxic therapies induce DNA damage, and DNA damage response (DDR) pathways modulate resistance to effective chemo-radiation therapy. Inhibiting DDR pathways by targeting ATM leads to sensitization and enhances cytotoxicity. The purpose of this study is to determine the key pre-clinical pharmacokinetic parameters and mechanisms that influence the CNS delivery of WSD0628, a novel ATM inhibitor. Pharmacokinetics and CNS distribution studies were conducted in FVB wild-type mice following intravenous (IV) and oral (PO) dosing (5 mg/kg). Plasma, brain, and spinal cord samples were harvested after dosing and drug concentrations were measured using LC-MS/MS. The free fraction of WSD0628 was measured in plasma, brain, and spinal cord using rapid equilibrium dialysis. Our results indicate that WSD0628 has a half-life of 4.11 hrs and a high oral bioavailability (0.95). The brain partition coefficient (AUCbrain/AUCplasma, i.e., Kp, brain) is 0.05 and 0.11 after IV and PO dosing, respectively. The free fraction in plasma is 2.01 ± 0.02 % and in brain it is 1.22 ± 0.40 %. The unbound brain partition coefficient (Kpuu brain) is 0.03 and 0.06 after IV and PO dosing, respectively. The differential binding to plasma and brain tissues results in a relatively low Kpuu, a key parameter describing brain penetrability. These data show that WSD0628, a highly potent inhibitor of ATM, reached sufficient concentrations in brain after a single dose of 5 mg/kg to engage ATM over the desired time frame and elicit a response after DNA damage by chemo-radiotherapy. WSD0628 shows promising potential and further evaluations are underway to determine if efflux transporters at the BBB limit its brain distribution.

BackgroundThe extracellular microenvironment modulates cancer behavior. Although radiographic contrast enhancement is an ominous finding in gliomas, it remains unclear if the associated blood-brain barrier disruption merely reflects or functionally supports tumor aggressiveness.MethodsWe utilized intra-operative microdialysis to sample the extracellular metabolome of radiographically diverse regions during fifteen neurosurgical resections. The global extracellular metabolome of recovered microdialysate was evaluated via ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) and assessed using enrichment and correlation analyses.ResultsAmong 162 named metabolites identified via ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, guanidinoacetate (GAA), was 126.32x higher in enhancing tumor than in adjacent brain. 48 additional metabolites were 2.05-10.18x more abundant in enhancing tumor than brain. With exception of GAA, and 2-HG in IDH-mutant gliomas, differences between non-enhancing tumor and brain microdialysate were comparatively modest and less consistent. The enhancing but not the non-enhancing glioma metabolome was significantly enriched for plasma-associated metabolites largely comprising amino acids and carnitines.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that metabolite diffusion through a disrupted blood-brain barrier may largely define the enhancing extracellular glioma metabolome. Future studies are needed to determine how the altered extracellular metabolome impacts glioma behavior.

Genotoxic damage induced by radiation triggers a highly coordinated DNA damage response, and molecular inhibitors of key nodes within this complex response network can profoundly enhance the antitumor efficacy of radiation. This is especially true for drugs targeting the catalytic subunit of DNA-dependent protein kinase, which is a core component of the nonhomologous end-joining DNA repair pathway, and ataxia telangiectasia mutated, which coordinates cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and DNA repair functionalities after radiation exposure. Unlike the more modest in vitro radiosensitizing effects seen with classic sensitizing agents such as cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, or taxanes, DNA-dependent protein kinase or ataxia telangiectasia mutated inhibitors provide much more robust sensitizing effects in vitro, as might be anticipated from targeting these key DNA repair modulators. However, patients with homozygous inactivating mutations of ataxia telangiectasia mutated or mice with homozygous defects in DNA-dependent protein kinase (severe combined immunodeficiency) have profoundly enhanced acute normal tissue radiation reactions. Therefore, there is significant potential that the combination of small molecule inhibitors of these kinases with radiation could cause similar dose-limiting acute normal tissue toxicities. Similarly, although less understood, inhibition of these DNA repair response pathways could markedly increase the risk of late radiation toxicities. Because these potent radiosensitizers could be highly useful to improve local control of otherwise radiation-resistant tumors, understanding the potential for elevated risks of radiation injury is essential for optimizing therapeutic ratio and developing safe and informative clinical trials. In this review, we will discuss 2 straightforward models to assess the potential for enhanced mucosal toxicity in the oral cavity and small intestine established in our laboratories. We also will discuss similar strategies for evaluating potential drug–radiation interactions with regard to increased risks of debilitating late effects.