Search

IntroductionIncreased plasma renin activity (PRA) levels may have various causes: PRA has gained importance as prognostic marker for patients with heart failure; age may have an influence on endogenous PRA levels; and ACE inhibitor (ACEi) treatment can also interfere with PRA levels. We aimed to investigate PRA levels in very young children with heart failure, with and without ACEi treatment.MethodsAs part of a PK-PD study of enalapril for pediatric heart failure (LENA studies), blood samples were collected and analyzed for PRA levels before, 4 hours after and within the first week of enalapril treatment. In addition, a literature search was conducted according to the PRISMA concept in MEDLINE to identify studies on PRA levels in healthy children as well as in children with heart failure in the age range from 1 day up to 2 years. Comparison was performed with LENA study data and with data from 9 healthy volunteers.ResultsInfants from LENA studies with heart failure (n= 35, aged 25 days – 2.1 years) had median PRA levels of 19.7 (n=35) before, 29.0 (n=34, p>0.05) 4 hours after enalapril dose, and 89.1 ng/mL/h (n=29, pConclusionsVery young children had higher endogenous PRA levels compared to adults. Heart failure at this age was associated with even higher PRA levels and ACEi treatment further increased PRA levels. These results indicate that patients appear to respond to ACEi treatment but question the value of PRA levels as prognostic marker in this population.

Item does not contain fulltext Aim: Clinical research in pediatrics is progressively initiated by academia. As the reliability of pharmacodynamic measures is closely linked to the quality of bioanalytical data, bioanalytical quality assurance is crucial. However, clear guidance on comprehensive bioanalytical quality monitoring in the academic environment is lacking. Methods & results: By applying regulatory guidelines, international recommendations and scientific discussions, a five-step quality control system for monitoring the bioanalysis of aldosterone by immunoassay was developed. It comprised performance qualification, calibration curve evaluation, analysis of the intra- and inter-run performance via quality control samples, incurred sample reanalysis and external quality assessment by interlaboratory testing. A total of 55 out of 70 runs were qualified for the quantification of aldosterone in the study sample enabling the evaluation of 954 pediatric samples and demonstrating reliability over the 29-month bioanalysis period. Conclusion: The bioanalytical quality control system successfully monitored the aldosterone assay performance and proved its applicability in the academic environment.

Contains fulltext : 220641.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) While the role of plasma renin activity (PRA) in heart failure has been widely studied in adults, comprehensive data on pediatric heart failure remain lacking. This drawback is increasingly being addressed by academic research. Nevertheless, such pediatric investigations are commonly conducted only once due to ethical constraints. Therefore, the quality of bioanalytical data must be ensured to acquire meaningful insights into maturing humoral parameters. However, appropriate post-validation assessment of bioanalytical runs is currently underrepresented by regulatory guidance. Thus, for applications in an academic environment, an easy-to-handle six-step bioanalytical quality control system was designed based on regulatory guidelines (e.g. U.S. Food and Drug Administration) combined with international recommendations (e.g. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute) and current scientific discussion. Its applicability to an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for determination of PRA was investigated within three pediatric trials of the EU-funded "Labeling of Enalapril in Neonates up to Adolescents" project. This quality control system identified 15 % bioanalytical runs as non-compliant to the predefined specifications and ensured the reliable quantification of 940 pharmacodynamic samples. The inter-run assessment of quality controls was able to demonstrate the comparability of the study results. Furthermore, 86 % of incurred sample reanalysis pairs complied with regulatory requirements (>67 %), thus underlining the long-term reproducibility of the utilized ligand-binding assay. Successful participation in interlaboratory testing confirmed the accuracy of the applied method throughout the entire study period. Further investigations showed no notable differences between the five applied lots of the PRA assay. The applicability of this quality control system was proven in an academic environment and ensured reliable results for PRA over the entire 24-month study period.

Introduction: Treatment of paediatric heart failure is based on paradigms extensively tested in the adult population assuming similar underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) like enalapril are one of the cornerstones of treatment and commonly used off-label in children. Dose recommendations have been extrapolated from adult experience, but the relationship between dose and pharmacokinetics (PK) in (young) children is insufficiently studied. Furthermore, appropriate paediatric formulations are lacking. Within the European collaborative project LENA, a novel formulation of enalapril orodispersible minitablets (ODMT), suitable for paediatric administration, will be tested in (young) children with heart failure due to either dilated cardiomyopathy or congenital heart disease in two pharmacokinetic bridging studies. Paediatric PK data of enalapril and its active metabolite enalaprilat will be obtained. In a follow-up study, the safety of enalapril ODMTs will be demonstrated in patients on long-term treatment of up to 10 months. Furthermore, additional information about pharmacodynamics (PD) and ODMT acceptability will be collected in all three studies. Methods and Analysis: Phase II/III, open-label, multicentre study. Children with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) (n = 25; 1 month to less than 12 years) or congenital heart disease (CHD) (n = 60; 0 to less than 6 years) requiring or already on ACEI will be included. Exclusion criteria include severe heart failure precluding ACEI use, hypotension, renal impairment, hypersensitivity to ACEI. For those naïve to ACEI up-titration to an optimal dose will be performed, those already on ACEI will be switched to an expected equivalent dose of enalapril ODMT and optimised. In the first 8 weeks of treatment, a PK profile will be obtained at the first dose (ACEI naïve patients) or when an optimal dose is reached. Furthermore, population PK will be done with concentrations detected over the whole treatment period. PD and safety data will be obtained at least at 2-weeks intervals. Subsequently, an intended number of 85 patients will be followed-up up to 10 months to demonstrate long-term safety, based on the occurrence of (severe) adverse events and monitoring of vital signs and renal function. Ethics and dissemination: Clinical Trial Authorisation and a favourable ethics committee opinion were obtained in all five participating countries. Results of the studies will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Trial registration numbers: EudraCT 2015-002335-17, EudraCT 2015-002396-18, EudraCT 2015-002397-21. Keywords: Clinical pharmacology, Paediatric cardiology, Heart failure, Dilated cardiomyopathy, Congenital heart disease

SummaryObjective This study was carried out to estimate the exposure of the central nervous system (CNS) to the antiepileptic drug (AED) lacosamide, under steady state conditions, in patients with epilepsy who take oral lacosamide alongside up to three other AEDs. Methods Twenty-seven serum and cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) samples were collected from 21 patients receiving lacosamide for the treatment of epilepsy (50–600 mg/day over two or three doses). This included 23 time-matched pairs of serum and CSF samples from 19 patients. The concentration of lacosamide in each sample was determined using high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). Linear regression was used to characterize the relationship between the CSF-to-serum ratio of lacosamide concentration and the time since dosing, the daily lacosamide dose, or the daily dose normalized by volume of distribution (Vd, approximated to total body water), and between the drug concentrations in each compartment (CSF vs. serum). Results Concentrations of lacosamide in CSF (mean ± standard deviation [SD] 7.37 ± 3.73 μg/ml, range 1.24–14.95, n = 27) and serum (mean ± SD 8.16 ± 3.82 μg/ml, range 2.29–15.45, n = 27) samples showed a good correlation over the dose range investigated. The mean CSF-to-serum ratio of lacosamide concentrations was 0.897 ± 0.193 (range 0.492–1.254, n = 23 time-matched pairs) and was independent of lacosamide dose. Significance Drug concentrations in the CSF are often used to indicate those in the brain interstitial fluid. In patients with epilepsy who follow a stable oral AED dosing regimen, lacosamide concentration in CSF is approximately 85% of that found in serum, suggesting that serum may be a valuable indicator of lacosamide concentration in the CNS.

Lacosamide-a third-generation antiepileptic drug available in multiple formulations-was first approved in 2008 as adjunctive therapy for partial-onset seizures (POS) in adults. In 2014, lacosamide was approved as monotherapy for POS by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). A loading dose administration was approved in 2013 by the European Medicines Agency and in 2014 by the FDA. Unlike traditional sodium channel blockers affecting fast inactivation, lacosamide selectively enhances sodium channel slow inactivation. This mechanism of action results in stabilization of hyperexcitable neuronal membranes, inhibition of neuronal firing and reduction in long-term channel availability without affecting physiological function. Lacosamide is rapidly absorbed, with maximum plasma concentrations reached 0.5-4 h after intake. Oral bioavailability is high (100 %) for a dose up to 800 mg. Bioavailability is irrespective of food intake. Variability in pharmacokinetic parameters is low (coefficients of variation almost all 20 %). The pharmacokinetic profile of lacosamide is consistent in healthy subjects and across different patient populations studied. Lacosamide elimination from plasma occurs with a terminal half-life of approximately 13 h in young subjects and 14-16 h in elderly subjects; this difference does not impact the dose regimen. Lacosamide produces a pharmacodynamic effect that is closely correlated with its plasma concentration. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relationship for reduction of seizure frequency can be described by a maximum effect (E max) model. Lacosamide does not induce or inhibit cytochrome P450 enzymes or known drug transporter systems, has low protein binding of less than 15 % and, because it has multiple elimination pathways, it has no clinically relevant interactions with commonly prescribed medications.

Purpose Rotigotine, a nonergolinic dopamine receptor agonist, is a once-daily transdermal patch developed for the treatment of Parkinson's disease and restless legs syndrome. The objective of the present study was to determine the pharmacokinetic characteristics and tolerability of rotigotine transdermal patch after repeated-dose application in healthy male and female Korean subjects. Methods In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, repeated-dose study, subjects were randomly assigned to receive either rotigotine or placebo (ratio, 20 rotigotine to 4 placebo, per sex). Rotigotine patches were applied once daily at a dose of 2 mg/24 h on days 1 to 3, followed by 4 mg/24 h on days 4 to 6. Serial blood and urine samples were collected on days 1 to 9 for the determination of the concentrations of rotigotine and its metabolites. Tolerability was evaluated by adverse events determined using physical examination, including vital signs with orthostatic measurements; ECG; and clinical laboratory testing. Findings A total of 48 healthy Korean subjects were enrolled (24 men, 24 women; mean age, 24 years). Approximately 50% of the total drug content was delivered within 24 hours. The mean plasma concentration of unconjugated rotigotine increased proportionally with dose. At the 2 mg/24 h dose at steady state, the geometric mean AUC 0–24h and C max values of unconjugated rotigotine were 5.88 ng·h/mL and 0.347 ng/mL, respectively; at the 4 mg/24 h dose, the corresponding values were 13.74 ng·h/mL and 0.838 ng/mL. The mean t ½ of rotigotine was 4.96 hours. At the 2 mg/24 h dose at steady state, the geometric mean AUC 0–24h and C max values of total rotigotine were 14.02 ng·h/mL and 0.776 ng/mL; at the 4-mg/24 h dose, 32.38 ng·h/mL and 1.867 ng/mL. Common adverse events reported in the rotigotine-treated subjects included nausea (17 subjects, 42.5%), headache (11, 27.5%), and dizziness (9, 22.5%). No clinically significant changes in blood pressure, ECG, or laboratory values were observed. Implications The mean plasma exposures of unconjugated rotigotine increased proportionally with dose. Repeated daily application of the rotigotine patch was well tolerated in these healthy Korean volunteers. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01964573.

Rotigotine is a dopamine receptor agonist indicated for the treatment of Parkinson's disease and moderate-to-severe restless legs syndrome. Continuous transdermal delivery of rotigotine via a silicon-based patch maintains stable plasma concentrations over 24 h. The objective of the study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of a multiple-dose schedule of rotigotine transdermal patch in Japanese and Caucasian subjects. In this open-label, repeated-dose, parallel-group study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01854216), healthy male and female subjects of Japanese or Caucasian ethnic origin were matched by gender, body mass index, and age. Subjects underwent a 9-day patch application period. 12 Japanese and 12 Caucasian subjects were included in the pharmacokinetic analyses. Mean apparent doses (actual amount of drug delivered) increased proportionally with rotigotine nominal dosages (1, 2, and 4 mg/24 h) and were similar for both ethnic groups, with large inter-individual variability. Mean plasma concentration-time profiles for unconjugated rotigotine were similar in both ethnic groups at day 3 for each dosage. Peak concentrations (C max,ss) and area under the concentration-time curves from pre-dose to the concentration measured 24 h after administration of patch (AUC(0-24,ss)) showed similar exposure in both groups; higher values in Japanese subjects were explained by differences in body weight. For total rotigotine, C max,ss and AUC(0-24,ss) values were higher in Caucasian subjects and could be explained by small differences in apparent dose. Rotigotine was generally well tolerated following multiple applications up to 4 mg/24 h. These findings suggest similar dosage requirements for rotigotine transdermal system in Japanese and Caucasian populations.

Lacosamide (LCM) is a functionalized amino acid specifically developed for use as an antiepileptic drug (AED) and is currently indicated as adjunctive treatment for partial-onset seizures in adults with focal epilepsy (maximum approved dose 400 mg/day). Characterization of the pharmacokinetic profile is an important aspect in the development of LCM. Studies in healthy subjects and in patients with focal epilepsy have established that LCM has several favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics, including rapid absorption and high oral bioavailability not affected by food, linear and dose-proportional pharmacokinetics, low inter- and intraindividual variability, low plasma protein binding, renal elimination, and a low potential for clinically relevant pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions both with AEDs and other common medications. Studies have demonstrated bioequivalence among the three LCM formulations (oral tablets, oral solution, and solution for intravenous (IV) infusion), allowing direct conversion to or from oral and IV administration without titration. Thus, the favorable and predictable pharmacokinetic profile and bioequivalence of LCM formulations, coupled with the low potential for clinically relevant pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions, make LCM an easy-to-use adjunctive treatment for the management of patients with focal epilepsy.

Summary Purpose Frequent plasma sampling to monitor pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), is invasive, costly and time consuming. For drugs with a well-defined PK profile, such as AED lacosamide, equations can accurately approximate PK parameters from one steady-state plasma sample. Methods Equations were derived to approximate steady-state peak and trough lacosamide plasma concentrations ( C peak,ss and C trough,ss , respectively) and area under concentration–time curve during dosing interval (AUC τ,ss ) from one plasma sample. Lacosamide ( k a : ∼2h −1 ; k e : ∼0.05h −1 , corresponding to half-life of 13h) was calculated to reach C peak,ss after ∼1h ( t max,ss ). Equations were validated by comparing approximations to reference PK parameters obtained from single plasma samples drawn 3–12h following lacosamide administration, using data from double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group PK study. Values of relative bias (accuracy) between −15% and +15%, and root mean square error (RMSE) values ≤15% (precision) were considered acceptable for validation. Results Thirty-five healthy subjects (12 young males; 11 elderly males, 12 elderly females) received lacosamide 100mg/day for 4.5 days. Equation-derived PK values were compared to reference mean C peak,ss , C trough,ss and AUC τ,ss values. Equation-derived PK data had a precision of 6.2% and accuracy of −8.0%, 2.9%, and −0.11%, respectively. Equation-derived versus reference PK values for individual samples obtained 3–12h after lacosamide administration showed correlation ( R 2 ) range of 0.88–0.97 for AUC τ,ss . Correlation range for C peak,ss and C trough,ss was 0.65–0.87. Error analyses for individual sample comparisons were independent of time. Conclusion Derived equations approximated lacosamide C peak,ss , C trough,ss and AUC τ,ss using one steady-state plasma sample within validation range. Approximated PK parameters were within accepted validation criteria when compared to reference PK values.

BackgroundACE-inhibitors are first choice treatment for adult and paediatric patients with heart failure. Since there are no systematic data on pharmacokinetics and safety in the young heart failure population, the EU funded a drug development program1 to fill those gaps for the ACE-inhibitor enalapril. An age appropriate paediatric formulation was also required.MethodsA paediatric patient cohort with heart failure was recruited to fulfil the paediatric investigation plan (PIP) requirements. The PIP required a total of 85 evaluable patients from birth to less than 12 years of age with a subset cohort of 25 patients with heart failure due to dilated cardiomyopathy and a subset of 60 heart failure patients of congenital heart disease. Out of these, 54% of patients must be aged below 12 months to provide a substantial amount of young patients.ResultsThe LENA consortium recruited 102 children from birth to 12 years. Out of those, 89 patients fulfilled relevant protocol criteria and could be regarded as evaluable. Of these, 26 demonstrated heart failure due to cardiomyopathy and 63 due to congenital heart disease. Sixty five patients (73%) were below 12 months of age. Moreover, 22 patients were below 3 months of age, 26 patients from 3 months to less than 6 months and 17 patients from 6 months up to 12 months of age.ConclusionsThe LENA consortium had recruited the PDCO required number of paediatric patients for the drug development program LENA. As more than 2/3 of patients belong to the most vulnerable patient population below the age of 12 months, relevant data can be generated to fill gaps for the safe and reliable treatment with ACE-inhibitors of children with heart failure.ReferencesThe research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under grant agreement n°602295 (LENA)Disclosure(s)Nothing to disclose

Rotigotine, a non-ergolinic dopamine receptor agonist administered transdermally via a patch, is metabolized by several cytochrome P-450 (CYP450) isoenzymes, including CYP2C19. This open-label, multiple-dose study evaluated the effect of omeprazole, a competitive inhibitor of CYP2C19, on the pharmacokinetics of rotigotine and its metabolites under steady-state conditions in healthy male subjects (of the extensive metabolizer phenotype, CYP2C19). Subjects received rotigotine 2 mg/24 hours on days 1-3, 4 mg/24 hours on days 4-12, and omeprazole 40 mg once daily on days 7-12 immediately after patch application. Blood and urine samples were collected on days 6 and 12 to evaluate rotigotine pharmacokinetic parameters alone and in the presence of omeprazole. Data from 37 subjects were available for pharmacokinetic analysis. Point estimates (90% confidence intervals, CI) for the ratios of AUC(0-24)SS and Cmax,SS of unconjugated rotigotine for the comparison rotigotine + omeprazole:rotigotine alone were close to 1 (0.9853 [0.9024, 1.0757] for AUC(0-24)SS and 1.0613 [0.9723, 1.1585] for Cmax,SS ) with 90% CIs within the acceptance range for bioequivalence (0.80, 1.25). Selective inhibition of CYP2C19 by omeprazole did not alter the steady-state pharmacokinetic profile of rotigotine or its metabolites. Thus, rotigotine dose adjustment is not required in patients receiving omeprazole, or other CYP2C19 inhibitors.

Background and Objectives Rotigotine is a dopamine receptor agonist with activity across the D1 through to D5 receptors as well as select serotonergic and adrenergic sites; continuous transdermal delivery of rotigotine with replacement of the patch once daily maintains stable plasma concentrations over 24 h. Rotigotine is indicated for the treatment of early and advanced-stage Parkinson’s disease and moderate-to-severe idiopathic restless legs syndrome. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a drug may vary between subjects of different ethnic origin. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of single-dose treatment with rotigotine transdermal patch in Japanese and Caucasian subjects. Methods In this open-label, parallel-group study, healthy male and female subjects of Japanese or Caucasian ethnic origin were matched by sex, body mass index, and age. A single transdermal patch delivering 2 mg/24 h rotigotine (patch content 4.5 mg) was applied to the ventral/lateral abdomen for 24 h. The main outcome measures were the plasma concentrations of unconjugated and total rotigotine and its desalkyl metabolites and derived pharmacokinetic parameters (area under the concentration–time curve from time zero to last quantifiable concentration [AUClast], maximum plasma concentration [Cmax], and body weight- and dose-normalized values). Results The pharmacokinetic analysis included 48 subjects (24 Japanese, 24 Caucasian). The mean apparent dose of rotigotine was 2.0 ± 0.5 mg for Japanese subjects and 2.08 ± 0.58 mg for Caucasians. Plasma concentration–time profiles of unconjugated rotigotine and of the main metabolites were similar for both ethnic groups. Parameters of model-independent pharmacokinetics, Cmax, time to Cmax (tmax), and AUClast, for unconjugated rotigotine showed no statistically significant differences between Japanese and Caucasian subjects. Values of concentration-dependent pharmacokinetic parameters were higher in female subjects; this difference was minimized after correction for body weight. A statistically significant difference between ethnic groups was observed for total rotigotine concentrations (total rotigotine = unconjugated rotigotine + conjugated rotigotine), with slightly lower values in Caucasians after correction for body weight and apparent dose. No relevant differences were observed between males and females. Inter-individual variability was high. The terminal half-life for unconjugated rotigotine was 5.3 h in Japanese subjects and 5.7 h in Caucasians; corresponding values for total rotigotine were 8.6 h and 9.6 h. Less than 0.1 % of the apparent dose was renally excreted as the parent compound. Renal elimination of total rotigotine covers 11.7 % of absorbed dose in Japanese subjects and 10.8 % of the absorbed dose in Caucasians, whereas the renal elimination via total despropyl rotigotine was 8.2 and 7.1 %, respectively. The corresponding values for total desthienylethyl rotigotine were 3.5 % in Japanese subjects and 4.2 % Caucasians. Most adverse events were mild in intensity and typical for dopamine agonists or for transdermal therapeutics. Conclusion Administration of a single patch delivering 2 mg/24 h rotigotine resulted in comparable pharmacokinetic profiles in Japanese and Caucasian subjects. The rotigotine transdermal patch was generally well-tolerated. Our findings suggest similar dose requirements for Japanese and Caucasian populations.

The transdermally applied dopamine receptor agonist rotigotine is extensively metabolized in the liver. An open-label, parallel-group study was conducted to evaluate the effects of moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of rotigotine. Eight subjects with normal hepatic function and nine with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class B) received one rotigotine transdermal patch (providing a dose of 2 mg/24 h) daily for 3 days with a 24-h patch-on period. Blood and urine samples were collected to evaluate pharmacokinetic parameters characterizing drug bioavailability and elimination. Primary variables included plasma and urine concentrations of unconjugated rotigotine (active parent compound) and total rotigotine (unconjugated rotigotine plus sulfate and glucuronide conjugates) under steady-state (SS) conditions. For unconjugated rotigotine, point estimates for the ratios of AUC(0-24)SS and C max,SS between the two groups (normal vs. impaired hepatic function) were near 1: AUC(0-24)SS, 0.90 (90 % CI 0.59, 1.38) and C max,SS, 0.94 (90 % CI 0.66, 1.35); t max,SS and t 1/2 were lower in subjects with hepatic impairment, while renal clearance was unaffected and overall clearance was higher. For total rotigotine, C max,SS was higher in subjects with hepatic impairment compared with those with normal hepatic function (P = 0.0239, ANOVA). A tendency to reduced non-renal clearance was observed in subjects with hepatic impairment, consistent with their higher plasma concentrations of total rotigotine. Thus, moderate hepatic impairment did not influence the pharmacokinetics of unconjugated rotigotine under steady-state conditions suggesting that dose adjustment will not be required for patients with mild or moderate hepatic insufficiency. In addition, the rotigotine patch was well tolerated in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment.

The antiepileptic drug lacosamide is eliminated predominantly via the kidneys. Therefore, an evaluation of the impact of renal impairment on its pharmacokinetic profile is an important component of its safety assessment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile of lacosamide among individuals with renal impairment (mild, moderate, or severe) and among patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), including those on hemodialysis. This was an open-label, Phase I trial. The pharmacokinetics of a single oral 100-mg lacosamide dose were evaluated in five groups of participants: healthy controls, patients with mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment, and patients with ESRD (with and without hemodialysis). Forty participants completed the trial, eight in each group. In healthy volunteers, renal clearance accounted for approximately 30 % of total body clearance [geometric mean 0.5897 l/h (coefficient of variation 37.9 %) vs 2.13 l/h (20.8 %)]. With severe renal impairment, renal clearance was approximately 11 % of total body clearance [0.1428 l/h (31.8 %) vs 1.34 l/h (26.9 %)]. Terminal half-life and systemic exposure were increased with renal impairment, while total body clearance, renal clearance, and urinary excretion were decreased. Strong positive correlations between creatinine clearance, renal clearance, and urinary excretion were observed. Among patients with ESRD, approximately 50 % of lacosamide was cleared from systemic circulation by 4-h hemodialysis. In patients with essentially no renal clearance, nonrenal clearance was still present (1.1 l/h). Lacosamide was well tolerated by healthy volunteers and patients. In patients with mild-to-moderate renal impairment, lacosamide dose adjustment is not necessary, because total body clearance decreased by only approximately 20 %. Dose adjustment, however, is required for patients with severe renal impairment. Hemodialysis removes approximately 50 % of lacosamide from plasma; therefore, dose supplementation following hemodialysis should be considered.

Summary Purpose: To test for bioequivalence of 200 mg lacosamide oral tablet and syrup formulations. Additional objectives were to compare the pharmacokinetic profile of lacosamide in saliva and plasma, and to evaluate its tolerability. Methods: This open-label, randomized, two-way crossover trial was conducted in 16 healthy Caucasian male participants in Germany. The bioequivalence of 200 mg lacosamide tablet and syrup was evaluated using plasma to determine maximum measured concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve from zero to the last time point (AUC)(0–tz). Plasma and saliva samples for evaluation of pharmacokinetic parameters of lacosamide and the major metabolite O-desmethyl lacosamide (SPM 12809) were taken over 15 time points (0.5–72 h) and used to statistically compare bioavailability of the two. Urine samples were collected predose and over five time points (0–48 h) to evaluate the cumulative amount of unchanged drug and metabolite. Key Findings: Lacosamide median time to reach Cmax (tmax) was 1 h for tablet and 0.5 h for syrup in plasma and saliva. Mean terminal half life (t½) for tablet and syrup was 12.5 and 12.4 h in plasma, and 13.1 and 13.3 h in saliva, respectively. Tablet and syrup mean plasma AUC(0–tz) was 84.5 and 83.3 μg/mL*h, respectively. Mean AUC(0–tz) in saliva was 93.2 μg/mL*h for tablet and syrup. Mean Cmax for tablet was 5.26 μg/mL in plasma and 5.63 μg/mL in saliva. Syrup mean Cmax was 5.14 and 8.32 μg/mL in plasma and saliva, respectively. Within 2 h of syrup administration, elevated lacosamide concentration in saliva compared to plasma was observed. The ratio of lacosamide syrup to tablet was 0.98 for Cmax and 0.99 for AUC(0–tz) in plasma, and 1.00 for AUC(0–tz) in saliva; the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for these parameters were within the range of 0.80–1.25, which meets accepted bioequivalence criteria. The syrup-to-tablet ratio for Cmax in saliva was 1.48, and the 90% CIs exceeded the accepted upper boundary for bioequivalence (1.32–1.66). Both formulations were well tolerated. Metabolite concentration versus time profiles for saliva were similar to plasma following tablet and syrup administration. Significance: The tablet and syrup formulations of lacosamide 200 mg were bioequivalent and well tolerated. Saliva samples were demonstrated to be a suitable surrogate to evaluate lacosamide tablet pharmacokinetics in the central compartment. Due to residual syrup in the buccal cavity, limitations exist when using saliva to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of lacosamide syrup

Two open-label, randomized, multiple-dose clinical studies evaluated the potential for pharmacokinetic interaction between the antiepileptic drugs lacosamide and valproic acid. The influence of lacosamide on valproic acid pharmacokinetics (trial A) and valproic acid on lacosamide pharmacokinetics (trial B) was investigated in 32 healthy male volunteers, 16 in each trial. Volunteers in trial A received valproic acid (300 mg bid) with randomization to either early or late addition of lacosamide (200 mg bid). Those in trial B received lacosamide (200 mg bid) with randomization to either early or late addition of valproic acid (300 mg bid). Area under the concentration-time curve during a 12-hour dosing interval at steady state (AUC(τ,ss)) and maximum steady-state plasma drug concentration (C(max,ss)) were measured for each drug alone and together and tested for equivalence. The point estimates (90% confidence intervals) for AUC(τ,ss) and C(max,ss) were 104% (99%-109%) and 101% (97%-107%), respectively, for valproic acid and 100% (98%-103%) and 101% (96%-107%), respectively, for lacosamide, which were within the generally accepted equivalence range of 80% to 125%. No changes in the rate or extent of absorption, terminal half-life, or time to maximum concentration were observed. These results suggest that lacosamide and valproic acid have no relevant pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT • The transdermal dopamine agonist rotigotine has been shown to be an efficacious and well tolerated treatment for Parkinson's disease and restless legs syndrome in clinical trials. • The prevalence of Parkinson's disease and restless legs syndrome increases with age. • Renal function deteriorates with age and can influence drug treatment. • Many patients with end-stage renal disease experience restless legs syndrome. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS • The pharmacokinetic profiles of the active substance, unconjugated rotigotine, were similar in healthy subjects and subjects with renal impairment. • The results suggest that no dose adjustments are required for transdermal rotigotine in subjects with different stages of chronic renal insufficiency including patients on haemodialysis. AIM To evaluate the influence of different stages of chronic renal insufficiency on the pharmacokinetics and safety/tolerability of the transdermally applied dopamine agonist rotigotine in an open label group comparison including 32 subjects (healthy, mild, moderate or severe impairment of renal function and patients with end-stage renal insufficiency requiring haemodialysis). METHODS All subjects received a single transdermal 10 cm2 patch (24 h patch-on period) containing 4.5 mg rotigotine (nominal drug release 2 mg 24 h−1). Main evaluations included relative bioavailability and renal elimination of rotigotine and its metabolites. RESULTS Point estimates for the ratios between the groups with moderate to severe renal impairment and healthy subjects for the pharmacokinetic parameters AUC(0,tlast) and Cmax for the active substance unconjugated rotigotine were near 1:0.88 for AUC and 0.93 for Cmax for moderate renal impairment, 1.14 and 1.18 for severe renal impairment and 1.05 and 1.25 for end-stage renal insufficiency requiring haemodialysis. There was no correlation of these parameters with creatinine clearance. The amount of unconjugated rotigotine excreted into urine and renal clearance decreased with increasing severity of renal insufficiency but had no observable effect on total clearance as the amounts excreted were below 1% of the administered dose. Occurrence of adverse events did not increase with the degree of renal insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS The pharmacokinetic profiles of unconjugated rotigotine were similar in healthy subjects and subjects with impaired renal function indicating that no dose adjustments are required for transdermal rotigotine in patients with different stages of chronic renal insufficiency including patients on haemodialysis.

The dopamine agonist rotigotine was developed for the treatment of Parkinson's disease and restless legs syndrome. Disposition, metabolism, elimination, and absolute bioavailability of rotigotine were determined in six healthy male subjects by using two different forms of administration in a randomized sequence with a crossover design. Treatment A (continuous infusion) consisted of a single radiolabeled 12-h intravenous infusion of 1.2 mg of rotigotine (0.6 mg of [(14)C] and 0.6 mg of unlabeled rotigotine, 3.7 MBq) solution. Treatment B (transdermal application) consisted of a single 10-cm(2) patch containing 4.5 mg of unlabeled rotigotine with a patch-on period of 24 h. During the 12 h-infusion, total radioactivity concentration rapidly increased within 2 h; there was a slight additional increase toward the end of infusion. Plasma concentrations of total radioactivity declined by 75% within 12 h after completion of infusion. More than 94% of the radioactivity was excreted 216 h after the start of infusion, 71% by the kidneys and 23% by feces. Renal elimination of the parent compound was1%. Systemically absorbed rotigotine was rapidly metabolized. The major rotigotine biotransformation pathway was conjugation of the parent compound, mainly by sulfation; a second pathway was the formation of phase 1 metabolites (N-desalkylation) with subsequent conjugation. Plasma concentration-time profiles of unchanged rotigotine during and after infusion and during and after patch administration were comparable. Absolute bioavailability of transdermally applied rotigotine was 37%.

Rotigotine transdermal patch is a new non-ergolinic dopamine agonist developed for the treatment of Parkinson's disease and restless legs syndrome. Peripheral dopaminergic side-effects of dopamine agonists such as nausea and vomiting can be prevented by the antiemetic agent domperidone.The study results show no evidence for an interaction of domperidone on bioavailability and steady-state pharmacokinetics of transdermal rotigotine. Co-administration of domperidone and rotigotine does not require dose adjustments for rotigotine transdermal patch.To evaluate the influence of the antiemetic agent domperidone on steady-state pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of multiple-dose treatment of the transdermally applied non-ergolinic dopamine agonist rotigotine.Sixteen healthy male subjects (mean age 30.3 years) participated in a randomized, two-way crossover clinical trial. Treatment A consisted of transdermal rotigotine patch (2 mg (24 h)(-1), 10 cm(2), total drug content 4.5 mg) applied daily for 4 days, and concomitant oral domperidone (10 mg t.i.d.) for 5 days. For treatment B, subjects received only transdermal rotigotine treatment (daily for 4 days). Pharmacokinetic variables describing systemic exposure and renal elimination of rotigotine and metabolites, and safety and tolerability of the treatment were assessed.The primary steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters (C(max,ss) and AUC((0-24),ss)) were similar with or without co-administration of domperidone. Geometric mean ratios were close to 1 and respective 90% confidence intervals were within the acceptance range of bioequivalence (0.8, 1.25): C(max,ss) 0.96 (0.86, 1.08) and AUC((0-24),ss) 0.97 (0.87, 1.08). t(max,ss), t(1/2), secondary parameters calculated on days 4/5 after repeated patch application (C(min,ss), C(ave,ss), AUC((0-tz))) and renal elimination for unconjugated rotigotine and its metabolites were also similar with and without comedication of domperidone. A reduction in the dopaminergic side-effect nausea was seen with domperidone comedication.No changes of pharmacokinetic parameters describing systemic exposure and renal elimination of rotigotine were observed when domperidone was administered concomitantly with rotigotine. The lack of pharmacokinetic interactions indicates that a dose adjustment of rotigotine transdermal patch is not necessary with concomitant use of domperidone.

Age- and sex-related differences in body composition could affect the pharmacokinetic parameters of administered drugs. The purpose of this post hoc analysis was to investigate the influences of age and sex on the pharmacokinetics of lacosamide. This post hoc analysis used pharmacokinetic data taken at steady state from (i) two phase I studies of oral lacosamide in healthy adult subjects (n = 66), and (ii) a population pharmacokinetic analysis carried out using data from two phase III studies of adjunctive oral lacosamide in adults (n = 565) with focal epilepsy taking 1–3 concomitant anti-epileptic drugs. Phase I data were stratified by age and sex as ‘younger female’ (aged 18–40 years), ‘younger male’ (aged 18–45 years) or ‘elderly male/female’ (aged ≥65 years), then normalized by body weight (lean body weight or fat-free mass), height or volume of distribution, and analysed using non-compartmental analysis. Population pharmacokinetic data were stratified by sex and analysed using a one-compartment model. Minor numerical differences between lacosamide exposure [the area under the concentration–time curve at steady state over the dosage interval (AUCτ,ss)] and the maximum plasma concentration at steady state (C max,ss) in subjects of different ages or sexes were noted. The differences could be explained by a scaling factor between the drug applied and the plasma concentration. Following normalization by lean body weight or volume of distribution, an analysis of relative bioavailability resulted in 90 % confidence intervals of the ratios for AUCτ,ss and C max,ss for age (elderly to younger) or sex (male to female) falling within the range accepted for equivalence (80–125 %); without normalization, the 90 % confidence intervals were outside this range. Minor numerical differences in lacosamide plasma concentrations were noted in the comparison between male and female patients (aged 16–71 years) with focal epilepsy. Simulations using different body weights demonstrated a minimal effect of body weight on lacosamide plasma concentrations in adult patients with focal epilepsy. Age and sex had no relevant effects on the rates of absorption and elimination of lacosamide in this post hoc analysis, as the minor numerical differences could be explained by the main scaling factor for body weight or volume of distribution. The pharmacokinetic profile of lacosamide was unaffected by age or sex in adults with focal epilepsy.

Lacosamide (LCM) is a functionalized amino acid specifically developed for use as an antiepileptic drug (AED) and is currently indicated as adjunctive treatment for partial-onset seizures in adults with focal epilepsy (maximum approved dose 400 mg/day). Characterization of the pharmacokinetic profile is an important aspect in the development of LCM. Studies in healthy subjects and in patients with focal epilepsy have established that LCM has several favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics, including rapid absorption and high oral bioavailability not affected by food, linear and dose-proportional pharmacokinetics, low inter- and intraindividual variability, low plasma protein binding, renal elimination, and a low potential for clinically relevant pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions both with AEDs and other common medications. Studies have demonstrated bioequivalence among the three LCM formulations (oral tablets, oral solution, and solution for intravenous (IV) infusion), allowing direct conversion to or from oral and IV administration without titration. Thus, the favorable and predictable pharmacokinetic profile and bioequivalence of LCM formulations, coupled with the low potential for clinically relevant pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions, make LCM an easy-to-use adjunctive treatment for the management of patients with focal epilepsy.

Recent data suggest that P-glycoprotein may be involved in cellular transport of lacosamide. To investigate potential drug–drug interactions (DDIs) between lacosamide and digoxin, this phase I, multiple-dose, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial assessed the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of digoxin administered in combination with lacosamide or placebo. Twenty healthy White male volunteers were randomised. After receiving digoxin 0.25 mg three times daily on day 1 (loading dose), participants received digoxin 0.25 mg once daily on days 2–22. Participants received either lacosamide (200 mg twice daily) or placebo on days 8–11 and vice versa on days 18–21, after a 6-day washout. The steady-state area under concentration–time curve over the dosing interval (AUC24,ss) and maximum steady-state plasma concentration (C max,ss) of digoxin were measured; ratios of these parameters for co-administration of digoxin + lacosamide versus digoxin alone were used to evaluate potential DDIs. Interaction was excluded if the 90 % confidence interval (CI) for the geometric mean ratio of AUC24,ss and C max,ss fell within the acceptance range for bioequivalence (0.8–1.25). The point estimates (90 % CI) of the geometric mean ratios for co-administration of digoxin with lacosamide versus digoxin alone for AUC24,ss [1.024 (0.979–1.071)] and C max,ss [1.049 (0.959–1.147)] were within the acceptance range for bioequivalence. Digoxin and lacosamide co-administration was generally well-tolerated. A small numerical increase in the mean PR interval following co-administered digoxin + lacosamide was observed versus digoxin alone and versus pre-treatment baseline values (178.5 vs. 170.4 or 166.8 ms, respectively). The RR interval increased in parallel. The change was not considered clinically relevant. Co-administration of steady-state digoxin (0.25 mg/day) with multiple-dose lacosamide (400 mg/day) versus digoxin alone revealed no differences in digoxin disposition.

Aim: The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) and its metabolites after infusion of alprostadil in patients undergoing haemodialysis.

The antiepileptic drug lacosamide has a low potential for drug-drug interactions, but is a substrate and moderate inhibitor of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme CYP2C19.This phase I, randomized, open-label, two-way crossover trial evaluated the pharmacokinetic effects of lacosamide and omeprazole coadministration.Healthy, White, male volunteers (n = 36) who were not poor metabolizers of CYP2C19 were randomized to treatment A (single-dose 40 mg omeprazole on days 1 and 8 together with 6 days of multiple-dose lacosamide [200-600 mg/day] on days 3-8) and treatment B (single doses of 300 mg lacosamide on days 1 and 8 with 7 days of 40 mg/day omeprazole on days 3-9) in pseudorandom order, separated by a ≥ 7-day washout period. Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and peak concentration (C(max)) were the primary pharmacokinetic parameters measured for lacosamide or omeprazole administered alone (reference) or in combination (test). Bioequivalence was determined if the 90 % confidence interval (CI) of the ratio (test/reference) fell within the acceptance range of 0.8-1.25.The point estimates (90 % CI) of the ratio of omeprazole + lacosamide coadministered versus omeprazole alone for AUC (1.098 [0.996-1.209]) and C(max) (1.105 [0.979-1.247]) fell within the acceptance range for bioequivalence. The point estimates (90 % CI) of the ratio of lacosamide + omeprazole coadministration versus lacosamide alone also fell within the acceptance range for bioequivalence (AUC 1.133 [1.102-1.165]); C(max) 0.996 (0.947-1.047).Steady-state lacosamide did not influence omeprazole single-dose pharmacokinetics, and multiple-dose omeprazole did not influence lacosamide single-dose pharmacokinetics.

Alprostadil (prostaglandin E1) is the preferred monotherapy for intracavernous injection in the diagnosis and treatment of erectile dysfunction. Our study was designed to evaluate whether there is a difference in the pharmacokinetics of prostaglandin E1 and its main metabolites after intracavernous injection or short-term intravenous infusion. In addition, we also investigated the influence of the erectile response on prostaglandin E1 kinetics after intracavernous injection.A total of 24 patients with erectile dysfunction received, in a randomized order at an interval of 5 hours, an intracavernous injection or a 30-minute intravenous infusion of 20 microg. of alprostadil alfadex (prostaglandin E1). Venous blood samples were obtained 5 minutes before and at various times after the applications. We used highly sensitive gas chromatography/double-mass spectrometry method to measure prostaglandin E1 and its metabolites in plasma.We demonstrated the presence of relevant systemic blood levels of prostaglandin E1 and its metabolites immediately after intracavernous injection. We found significantly lower systemic prostaglandin E1 concentrations between 7 and 20 minutes after intracavernous injection in patients with an erectile response compared with those without.We found significant systemic concentrations of prostaglandin E1 and its metabolites after intracavernous injection. The systemic presence did not lead to significant changes in vital signs.

This article gives an introduction to the combination of drug transports and drug action in a body system. With the law of mass action, the Emax model has been deduced as the basis of correlation between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Summary Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the antiepileptic drug lacosamide on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the anticoagulant warfarin. Methods In this open-label, two-treatment crossover study, 16 healthy adult male volunteers were randomized to receive a single 25-mg dose of warfarin alone in one period and lacosamide 200 mg twice daily on days 1–9 with a single 25 mg dose of warfarin coadministered on day 3 in the other period. There was a 2-week washout between treatments. Pharmacokinetic end points were area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC(0,last) and AUC(0,∞)) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) for S- and R-warfarin. Pharmacodynamic end points were area under the international normalized ratio (INR)–time curve (AUCINR), maximum INR (INRmax), maximum prothrombin time (PTmax) and area under the PT-time curve (AUCPT). Key Findings Following warfarin and lacosamide coadministration, Cmax and AUC of S- and R-warfarin, as well as peak value and AUC of PT and INR, were equivalent to those after warfarin alone. In particular, the AUC(0,∞) ratio (90% confidence interval) for coadministration of warfarin and lacosamide versus warfarin alone was 0.97 (0.94–1.00) for S-warfarin and 1.05 (1.02–1.09) for R-warfarin, and the AUCINR ratio was 1.04 (1.01–1.06). All participants completed the study. Significance Coadministration of lacosamide 400 mg/day did not alter the pharmacokinetics of warfarin 25 mg or the anticoagulation level. These results suggest that there is no need for dose adjustment of warfarin when coadministered with lacosamide.

Objective: To investigate the potential for pharmacokinetic interactions between moexipril, a new converting enzyme inhibitor, and hydrochlorothiazide after single dose administration. Methods: 12 healthy male volunteers were studied by an open, randomised, three-way cross-over design, in which single doses of moexipril, hydrochlorothiazide and the two drugs together were administered. Blood and urine were collected up to 48 hours for measurement of the concentrations of moexipril and its metabolite moexiprilat. In addition, the urine samples were analysed for hydrochlorothiazide. Results: For the area under the plasma concentration-time curve calculated from time 0 to a concentration greater than zero, AUC(0–t), the study showed a mean value of moexipril 437 ng ⋅ ml−1⋅ h−1 following administration of moexipril alone and 416 ng ⋅ ml−1⋅ h−1 following moexipril concomitantly with hydrochloro- thiazide. The corresponding values for the metabolite moexiprilat were 203 and 215 ng ⋅ ml−1⋅ h−1, respectively. The cmax of moexipril and the metabolite (data of the metabolite in parenthesis) were 245.4 (70.8) ng ⋅ ml−1 after administration of moexipril alone and 241.0 (69.2) ng ⋅ ml−1 after coadministration of hydrochlorothiazide. The mean total renal excretion (TUE) of hydrochlorothiazide was 15.2 mg when administered alone and 15.1 mg when given together with moexipril. The corresponding mean TUE-values for moexiprilat were 334 (1200) and 453 (1460) μg. Conclusion: The coadministration of moexipril with hydrochlorothiazide had no demonstrable effect on the measured pharmacokinetic parameters of moexipril, its active metabolite moexiprilat or hydrochlorothiazide.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the antiepileptic drug lacosamide affects the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of a combined oral contraceptive (OC; ethinylestradiol 0.03 mg plus levonorgestrel 0.15 mg). METHODS: This was an open-label trial in healthy female volunteers. Eligible women entered cycle 1 of the trial on the first day of menstruation. Cycle 1 was a medication-free run-in phase of approximately 28 days to confirm that normal ovulation occurred. Volunteers with confirmed ovulation entered the subsequent cycle and started taking OCs. After establishing ovulation suppression (defined as progesterone serum concentration

Rotigotine, a non-ergolinic dopamine receptor agonist administered transdermally via a patch, is metabolized by several cytochrome P-450 (CYP450) isoenzymes, including CYP2C19. This open-label, multiple-dose study evaluated the effect of omeprazole, a competitive inhibitor of CYP2C19, on the pharmacokinetics of rotigotine and its metabolites under steady-state conditions in healthy male subjects (of the extensive metabolizer phenotype, CYP2C19). Subjects received rotigotine 2 mg/24 hours on days 1-3, 4 mg/24 hours on days 4-12, and omeprazole 40 mg once daily on days 7-12 immediately after patch application. Blood and urine samples were collected on days 6 and 12 to evaluate rotigotine pharmacokinetic parameters alone and in the presence of omeprazole. Data from 37 subjects were available for pharmacokinetic analysis. Point estimates (90% confidence intervals, CI) for the ratios of AUC(0-24)SS and Cmax,SS of unconjugated rotigotine for the comparison rotigotine + omeprazole:rotigotine alone were close to 1 (0.9853 [0.9024, 1.0757] for AUC(0-24)SS and 1.0613 [0.9723, 1.1585] for Cmax,SS ) with 90% CIs within the acceptance range for bioequivalence (0.80, 1.25). Selective inhibition of CYP2C19 by omeprazole did not alter the steady-state pharmacokinetic profile of rotigotine or its metabolites. Thus, rotigotine dose adjustment is not required in patients receiving omeprazole, or other CYP2C19 inhibitors.

Background/Aims: To evaluate the bioequivalence of intravenous and oral lacosamide (tablet), an antiepileptic drug. Methods: Two randomized, single-dose (200 mg) trials were conducted: a 2-way trial (study A, 15-min infusion, oral tablet) and a 3-way crossover trial (study B, 30- and 60-min infusions, oral tablet). Twenty four healthy men participated in study A and 27 in study B. Eighteen blood samples were taken before to 72 h after lacosamide administration during each treatment period, followed by a 1-week washout. Safety and the ratio of intravenous/oral lacosamide for AUC0–tz (area under the concentration-time curve from zero up to the last measurable plasma concentration) and Cmax (maximum plasma concentration) were evaluated. Results: For AUC0–tz and Cmax, 90% confidence intervals for the ratio of intravenous/oral lacosamide fell within the predetermined bioequivalence range (80–125%) for 30- and 60-min infusions. In study A, all adverse events (AEs) were mild, with no discontinuations. In study B, 3 volunteers discontinued due to AEs; one serious AE (epiglottitis) was reported. No clinically relevant effects on vital signs, electrocardiograms or laboratory parameters and no AEs relating to infusion site were reported. Conclusion: Intravenous infusions (15, 30 and 60 min) of 200 mg lacosamide are as well tolerated as the oral tablet. Bioequivalence was demonstrated for 30- and 60-min infusions; therefore, direct conversion from oral to intravenous lacosamide, or vice versa, is possible.

Background The dopamine agonist rotigotine is formulated in a transdermal delivery system (patch) for once-daily application. It has been reported as efficacious in the treatment of idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) and restless legs syndrome. Objective This article summarizes the results of 3 clinical studies conducted to characterize the 24-hour pharmacokinetic profile of rotigotine in steady state and the effect of different patch application sites on this profile. In addition, the relative bioavailability of a single, large patch versus 2 smaller patches was assessed. Methods One Phase I study (SP871) assessed the steady-state pharmacokinetic properties at different application sites at a rotigotine maintenance dose of 3 mg/24 hours in healthy participants. Due to tolerability issues, the steady-state pharmacokinetic properties of rotigotine at higher doses (8 mg/24 hours) was assessed in 2 Phase I studies (SP630, SP651) in early-stage PD patients. Relative rotigotine bioavailability from a 40 cm(2) patch versus 2 × 20 cm(2) patches (SP651) and from a 15 cm(2) patch versus 1 × 5 cm(2) + 1 × 10 cm(2) patches (SP871) was also evaluated. Rotigotine concentrations in plasma were analyzed using a validated LC-MS/MS method. The pharmacokinetic variables were calculated using standard noncompartmental analysis. Results Release of rotigotine to the skin was 31% to 62% of total drug content in the patch. Variability of rotigotine exposure was low within participants (15%) compared with the variability observed between participants (54%). Rotigotine exposure increased proportionally in the therapeutic dose range of 2 mg/24 hours to 8 mg/24 hours. Plasma concentrations at steady state were stable over the 24-hour patch-on period. Delivery via a single, large patch compared with a combination of smaller patches did not appear to influence exposure to rotigotine. Bioavailability showed some variability depending on patch application site (hip, shoulder, abdomen, flank, thigh, upper arm); the respective mean ratios for AUC ranged between 0.87 (abdomen vs flank) and 1.46 (shoulder vs thigh). Conclusions Continuous rotigotine delivery via a once-daily transdermal patch generated stable mean steady-state 24-hour plasma concentrations in healthy participants as well as patients with early-stage PD. Doses were achieved either by application of 1 large patch or a combination of smaller patches, resulting in the same total surface area.

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of single and repeated doses of lacosamide in healthy male Korean volunteers and to compare the PK profile of lacosamide in Korean and Caucasian populations. Methods: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-escalation trial, 16 volunteers received a single dose (50 mg) of lacosamide or placebo, and 32 volunteers were administered single/repeated twice-daily doses (100 or 200 mg) of lacosamide or placebo. Results: For multiple doses of 100 and 200 mg twice daily, the geometric means Cmax,ss were 6.23 (15.0) and 13.13 (8.9) µg/ml respectively, and AUCτ,ss values were 52.10 (17.0) and 112.35 (13.0) µg·h/ml, respectively. Values for both parameters were relatively higher than those seen in Caucasians. To further describe ethnic differences, population PK analysis was assessed. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination was selected and effects of CLcreatinine on CL/F and body surface area on V/F were included in the final model. Conclusion: There were no other ethnic differences in the PK profile of lacosamide between Koreans and Caucasians based on the population PK analysis, except for the demographic differences.

The absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination of the anti-epileptic drug lacosamide were determined in 10 healthy male volunteers following intravenous or oral administration in a single-center, open-label, single-dose trial. Volunteers were randomized to receive either a continuous intravenous infusion of 100 mg (40 μCi) [14C]-lacosamide administered over 60 min, or a 100 mg (40 μCi) [14C]-lacosamide dose given as an oral solution. During the infusion, total radioactivity concentrations reached peak levels at 1 h post dose followed by a decline of 71 % within 24 h. More than 97 % of radioactivity was excreted within 168 h; 96.8 % in urine and 0.3 % in feces. Following oral administration, total radioactivity concentrations increased to peak levels within 0.5 h followed by a decline of 65 % within 24 h. Approximately 94.6 % of radioactivity was excreted within 168 h after oral administration, 94.2 % by the kidneys and 0.4% in feces. A comparison of AUC values (po/iv) of unchanged lacosamide indicates a high absolute bioavailability. The metabolic profile was analyzed using pooled urine samples, and following intravenous and oral administration, respectively, a total of 38 and 34 % unchanged lacosamide, 28 and 28 % of the desmethyl metabolite and 19 and 17 % of a polar fraction were measured. Additional metabolites were identified only in small amounts (

To evaluate the influence of different stages of chronic renal insufficiency on the pharmacokinetics and safety/tolerability of the transdermally applied dopamine agonist rotigotine in an open label group comparison including 32 subjects (healthy, mild, moderate or severe impairment of renal function and patients with end-stage renal insufficiency requiring haemodialysis). METHODS All subjects received a single transdermal 10 cm² patch (24 h patch-on period) containing 4.5 mg rotigotine (nominal drug release 2 mg 24 h⁻¹). Main evaluations included relative bioavailability and renal elimination of rotigotine and its metabolites.Point estimates for the ratios between the groups with moderate to severe renal impairment and healthy subjects for the pharmacokinetic parameters AUC(0,t(last) ) and C(max) for the active substance unconjugated rotigotine were near 1:0.88 for AUC and 0.93 for C(max) for moderate renal impairment, 1.14 and 1.18 for severe renal impairment and 1.05 and 1.25 for end-stage renal insufficiency requiring haemodialysis. There was no correlation of these parameters with creatinine clearance. The amount of unconjugated rotigotine excreted into urine and renal clearance decreased with increasing severity of renal insufficiency but had no observable effect on total clearance as the amounts excreted were below 1% of the administered dose. Occurrence of adverse events did not increase with the degree of renal insufficiency.The pharmacokinetic profiles of unconjugated rotigotine were similar in healthy subjects and subjects with impaired renal function indicating that no dose adjustments are required for transdermal rotigotine in patients with different stages of chronic renal insufficiency including patients on haemodialysis.

This open-label phase I trial assessed potential pharmacokinetic interactions between oral levodopa/carbidopa and transdermal rotigotine treatment at steady state. Twenty-four participants with idiopathic restless legs syndrome (12 per group) received levodopa/carbidopa (100 mg/25 mg bid) and rotigotine (initial dose 2 mg/24 h for 3 days, followed by 4 mg/24 h) in a randomized sequence as monotherapy and in combination during hospitalization for 13 days. Primary pharmacokinetic parameters were AUC(ss) and C(max,ss) of levodopa, carbidopa, and rotigotine at steady state. Mean concentration-time profiles of the 3 agents were similar during monotherapy and combination treatment. The point estimate for the ratio of geometric means (combined vs monotherapy) for AUC(ss) and C(max,ss) for levodopa (0.98 and 1.04), carbidopa (1.03 and 1.06), and unconjugated rotigotine (1.02 and 0.98) was near unity. All 90% confidence intervals were within the acceptance range for bioequivalence (0.8, 1.25). The most frequently documented adverse events were application site reactions (itching and reddening at application site) and headache. Most adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity, but 2 were of severe intensity (headache and extrasystoles); no serious adverse events occurred. The data presented indicate that rotigotine and levodopa/carbidopa can be coadministered without pharmacokinetic interactions between the compounds.

In this article, aspects of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion have been described bearing in mind the pathogenesis of allergic diseases and their possible therapeutic opportunities. The importance of the routes of administration of the different therapeutic groups has been emphasized. The classical aspects of drug metabolism and disposition related to oral administration have been reviewed, but special emphasis has been given to intranasal, cutaneous, transdermal, and ocular administration as well as to the absorption and the subsequent bioavailability of drugs. Drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters present in extrahepatic tissues, such as nasal mucosa and the respiratory tract, have been particularly discussed. As marketed antiallergic drugs include both racemates and enantiomers, aspects of stereoselective absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion have been discussed. Finally, a new and promising methodology, microdosing, has been presented, although it has not yet been applied to drugs used in the treatment of allergic diseases.

Background and objective: The dopamine agonist rotigotine has been formulated in a silicone-based transdermal system for once-daily administration. The objective of the present study was to characterise the mass balance of rotigotine in humans after administration of a single transdermal patch containing radiolabelled [14C]rotigotine and to quantify the pharmacokinetic profiles of total radioactivity and the corresponding rotigotine plasma concentrations. Methods: In a phase I trial, six healthy male Caucasian subjects were administered a single 10 cm2 patch containing 4.485mg of unlabelled and 0.015mg of [14C]-labelled rotigotine (total radioactivity 0.09 MBq per patch) with a patch-on period of 24 hours. Radioactivity was determined by liquid scintillation counting in unused patches, used patches, skin wash samples after 24 hours, plasma, urine and faeces samples up to 96 hours and skin stripping samples at 96 hours postapplication. Unconjugated rotigotine in plasma samples was determined by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Plasma samples were taken predose and 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours after patch application. Results: The rotigotine transdermal patch was well tolerated, and all subjects completed the trial. A total of 94.6% of the administered dose was recovered within 96 hours after patch application inclusive of the residual amounts in the patch. Within 24 hours, 51% of the total radioactivity was delivered to the human body system and 46.1% was systemically absorbed. Total radioactivity recovered in urine and faeces was 30.4% and 10.2%, respectively, of the radioactivity applied (corresponding to 65.8% and 21.8% of the dose absorbed, respectively). Conclusions: The mass balance of rotigotine within 96 hours after transdermal delivery of rotigotine via a 10 cm2 [14C]rotigotine patch with a total drug content of 4.5mg (corresponding to the nominal dose of 2mg/24 hours for the marketed rotigotine transdermal system) has been 95% explained. The systemic absorption was 46.1% of the administered dose, the majority of which was cleared from the body via urine and faeces within 96 hours after patch application. © 2007 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.

Objective: To characterize the lipophilic ACE inhibitor moexipril and its active metabolite moexiprilat regarding the duration of action, the susceptibility of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics to food intake and the concentration-dependent effect. Methods: Three independent, open, randomized studies were performed in healthy subjects using crossover or parallel-group designs. In the first study, pharmacokinetics (AUC, C max , t max ,t 1/2 ) and ACE inhibition (up to 72 h) were investigated following single oral doses of 15 mg moexipril administered in the fasting and postprandial state (n = 24). The individual ACE inhibition data and plasma concentration data were fitted to an E max model. In the second study, carried out in 52 volunteers, the pharmacokinetics were followed over 36 h following administration of 2 single oral doses of 15 mg moexipril. In the third study, the pharmacokinetics after multiple dosing of 15 mg moexipril once daily for 5 days were investigated in 12 young and 12 elderly subjects. Results: Moexiprilat t max was 1.5- 2 h with only minor differences between single and multiple dosing. Compared to fasting, the postprandial moexiprilat C max and AUC (ratio fed/fasted 58.0%; 90% CI 52.2 - 64.5%) were distinctly reduced (ANOVA p= 0.0001). Moexiprilat showed a biphasic elimination phase with an average t 1/2β of 29-30 h. In contrast to the α-phase, the plasma concentrations during the terminal elimination phase were not affected by food. A relationship between ACE inhibition and plasma concentration was not observed. The average ACE inhibition over 72 h was 71 % in the fasting state and 74% in the postprandial state. ACE inhibition increased to about 80% after 24 h and decreased to about 60% at 72 h. The S-shaped concentration-effect curve indicated that a moexiprilat level of 1.3 ng/ml was sufficient to produce 50% inhibition of ACE. With repeated dosing there were no signs of drug accumulation and day-to-day drug levels were relatively constant. The trough concentrations at 24 h did not fall below the limit of 1-2 ng/ml, i.e. a 50% ACE inhibition. Conclusion: Moexiprilat showed an extended duration of action owing to a long terminal pharmacokinetic half-life and produced a persistent ACE inhibition. Although the pharmacokinetics were partly influenced by food intake, ACE inhibition was not affected. This might be explained by a second compartment directly related to the ACE which is less prone to food effects and the reaching of a ceiling in the sigmoidal concentration-effect curve even with the lower C max concentrations associated with the postprandial state.

Prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) (30, 60, 120 micrograms) was administered by intravenous infusion over a 120 min period in an open, three way randomized, cross-over study to 12 healthy male volunteers. For the evaluation of PGE1, PGE0 and 15-keto-PGE0, blood samples were drawn prior to, during and after the infusion. Analytical measurements were performed by gas chromatography/negative ion chemical ionization triple stage quadruple mass spectrometry, a highly specific and sensitive GC/MS/MS-method. During intravenous infusion of 30, 60 and 120 micrograms PGE1, endogenous plasma PGE1 concentrations increased from 1.7 +/- 0.8 to 4.2 +/- 1.1, 6.7 +/- 1.0 and 11.0 +/- 1.9 pg ml-1 respectively. PGE0 plasma concentrations increased from endogenous levels of 1.3 +/- 1.0 pg ml-1 to 7.6 +/- 2.1, 14.1 +/- 3.7 and 28.0 +/- 3.0 pg ml-1 respectively, whilst 15-keto-PGE0 plasma concentrations increased from endogenous levels of 10.2 +/- 13.9 pg ml-1 to 99.3 +/- 27.9, 190.4 +/- 52.5 and 357.2 +/- 72.6 pg ml-1 respectively. Within the dose range of 30-120 micrograms PGE1 2 h-1 there was a linear increase of Cmax and AUC with the dose. The results of the analysis of variance after baseline and dose-correction show a 90% confidence interval in the bioequivalence acceptance range of 80 to 125%.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of lacosamide, an antiepileptic drug (AED) used to treat adults with partial-onset seizures, on cytochrome P450 isoenzyme 3A4 (CYP3A4) activity using midazolam as a substrate. Background As epilepsy is commonly treated with multiple AEDs, it is important to ascertain potential interactions between therapies. Design/Methods: In this single-centre, open-label trial, healthy male volunteers (19–50 years, BMI 19–30kg/m 2 ) received a single oral dose of midazolam 7.5mg on Day 1 of treatment period 1 to obtain baseline pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. During treatment period 2, volunteers received multiple doses of oral lacosamide 200mg b.i.d. (400mg/day) on Days 1–13, a single 200mg dose on the morning of Day 14, and three single doses of concomitant midazolam 7.5mg on Days 1, 4 and 14. Serial blood sampling was performed to determine AUC (0-∞) , AUC (0-tz) , C max , t max and t ½ for midazolam and its main metabolite 1-hydroxy midazolam, and C trough for lacosamide. Statistical comparisons between baseline midazolam PK parameters and those measured during coadministration were made using ANOVA and least squares mean ratios. Results: No change from baseline in the plasma concentration-versus-time profile was observed for midazolam or 1-hydroxy midazolam during coadministration with lacosamide (N=33), except for a slight increase in midazolam C max . For all three period 2 treatment timepoints, AUC (0-∞) and AUC (0-tz) were similar to baseline. AUC (0-tz) 90% confidence intervals for all treatment-to-baseline ratios were within the bioequivalence range of 0.80–1.25. Additionally, there was no change with treatment time for any secondary PK parameter of midazolam or 1-hydroxy midazolam. The portion of midazolam metabolized to 1-hydroxy midazolam did not change during the study. Conclusions: CYP3A4 enzymatic activity was not affected by a single lacosamide 200mg dose or repeated 400mg daily doses. There was no clinically relevant evidence for CYP3A4 induction or inhibition by lacosamide. Supported by: UCB Pharma. Disclosure: Dr. Cawello has received personal compensation with UCB Pharma as an employee. Dr. Surmann has received personal compensation for activities with UCB Pharma. Dr. Waitzinger has received personal compensation for activities with Bial, Eisai Inc., Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and UCB Pharma as a consultant.

11α-Hydroxy-9,15-dioxo-2,3,4,5,20-pentanor-19-carboxyprostanoic acid (PGE-M) was determined in plasma. Analysis was performed using an isotope dilution assay and gas chromatography/triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (GC/MS/MS). Basal levels of PGE-M were 64.05 ± 34.17 pg/ml. After infusion of 120 μg prostaglandin E 1 (PGE 1 ) in six subjects in 15 min, maximum levels of PGE-M of 618.6 ± 210.3 pg/ml were reached 20–45 min after the end of infusion. 3 h after the end of the infusion, plasma levels were close to the preinfusion levels. The pharmacokinetics of PGE-M in plasma were also determined. PGE-M has a half-life of 8.96 ± 3.53 min for formation and 31.71 ± 6.39 min for elimination. In addition to PGE-M, PGE 1 , 15-keto-PGE 1 and PGE 0 were also determined by GC/MS/MS.