Search

Background: This study aimed to investigate the distribution and frequency of concurrent alterations in different cancers across KRAS subtypes and in different KRAS subtypes across cancers, and to identify potentially actionable targets and patients who received targeted treatment matched to their genomic profile (GP). Materials and Methods: In this descriptive and single-center study, we included 188 patients with solid tumors harboring KRAS mutations in codon 12, 13, 61, 117, or 146, referred to the Phase 1 Unit, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark from mid-2016 to 2020. Genomic co-alterations were detected with whole-exome sequencing, RNA sequencing, SNP array, and mRNA expression array on fresh biopsies. The study is part of the Copenhagen Prospective Personalized Oncology study (NCT02290522). Results: The majority of patients had colorectal cancer (60.1%), non-small cell lung cancer (11.2%), or pancreatic cancer (10.6%). Most tumors were KRAS-mutated in codon 12 or 13 (93.7%) including G12D (27.1%), G12V (26.6%), G12C (11.7%), and G13D (11.2%). A total of 175 different co-alterations were found, most frequently pathogenic APC and TP53 mutations (55.9% and 46.4%, respectively) and high expression of CEACAM5 (73.4%). Different cancers and KRAS subtypes showed different patterns of co-alterations, and 157 tumors (83.5%) had potentially actionable targets with varying evidence of targetability (assessed using ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets). Of the 188 patients included in the study, 15 (7.4%) received treatment matched to their GP (e.g., immunotherapy and synthetic lethality drugs), of whom one had objective partial response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Conclusion: Performing extensive genomic analysis in patients with known KRAS-mutated solid tumors may contribute with information to the genomic landscape of cancers and identify targets for immunotherapy or synthetic lethality drugs

Background: Elastography can be measured with different imaging techniques and is increasingly used for noninvasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis. Little is known about the performance, and interrelation of different elastographic techniques, in prediction of hepatic fibrosis in pediatric liver disease. Objectives: We aimed to determine the discriminatory value for advanced fibrosis (Metavir F3-4) and evaluate the applicability of 2D shear wave ultrasound elastography (USe), Transient Elastography (TE) and Magnetic Resonance elastography (MRe) in pediatric liver disease. Methods: In patients with pediatric liver disease aged 0-19 years, USe, TE and MRe were compared with histopathological fibrosis stage. Multivariate logistic regression models for advanced fibrosis were considered. Discriminative performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the Brier Score. Primary analyses included complete cases. Multiple imputation was used as sensitivity analysis. Results: In 93 histologically evaluated patients USe, TE and MRe were performed 89, 93 and 61 times respectively. With increased liver stiffness values, significantly increased odds for presenting F3-4 were seen in individual models for ALT < 470 U/L, whereas the effect for ALT > 470 U/L was non-significant. Area under the curve and Brier Score for discrimination of advanced fibrosis were 0.798 (0.661-0.935) and 0.115 (0.064-0.166); 0.862 (0.758-0.966) and 0.118 (0.065-0.171); 0.896 (0.798-0.994) and 0.098 (0.049-0.148) for USe, TE and MRe respectively. No significant increase in discriminatory ability was found when combining elastographic modalities. Conclusions: In pediatric liver disease, USe, TE and MRe had a good discriminatory ability for assessment of advanced liver fibrosis, although TE and MRe performed best. In most children with pediatric liver disease, TE is a reliable and easily applicable measure.

Sinonasal intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (sITAC) is histomorphologically indistinguishable from colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC) leading to diagnostic challenges. Metastases from CRCs to the sinonasal tract have been reported. The aim of the study was to identify a biomarker making it possible to distinguish between sITAC and metastases of colorectal origin. Formalin-fixated paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue from 20 consecutive patients with sITAC treated at Rigshospitalet, Denmark from 2005 to 2017, 20 patients with CRC, and second patients with both sinonasal and colorectal carcinomas were included, and RNA-sequencing was performed on all samples. Moreover, a series of 26 samples from metastasizing CRC were included (in-house data). 3139 differentially expressed genes were identified, of these several were deemed as possible biomarkers, including CSDE1, for which immunohistochemical staining was performed. sITAC and CRC differ in genomic expression. CSDE1, previously found upregulated in CRC, was significantly differentially expressed. Using immunohistochemical staining, no sITACs displayed strong and diffuse staining for CSDE1, which represents a potential marker to use in distinguishing sITAC from a metastasis of colorectal origin. This knowledge could improve the diagnostic process and hopefully the outcome in patients with this rare tumor.

Background: The standard treatment for gastroesophageal cancer is neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by surgery, which has been shown to increase survival compared with surgery alone. Evidence is mounting that characterization of the oncologically induced tumor regression is of prognostic importance. However, no consensus regarding the optimal system for describing tumor regression exists. Thus, this study aims to explore three validated/promising tumor regression systems with a focus on their interobserver reliability and usability. Methods: We included 100 consecutive patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma who had undergone neoadjuvant oncological treatment followed by surgery. The tumors underwent tumor regression grade (TRG) assessment according to the Standard Mandard-, Modified Mandard-, and Becker systems to assess the interobserver reliability between two consultant pathologists. The interobserver reliability was determined by both Fleiss kappa and weighted kappa metrics. Besides, a semi-quantitative usability questionary was completed and it was expanded with usability comments. Results: The Fleiss kappa interobserver agreement was 0.67 [95% CI, 0.55–0.79], 0.88 [95% CI, 0.73–1.00], and 0.88 [95% CI, 0.73–1.00] for Standard Mandard-, Modified Mandard-, and the Becker systems, respectively. The weighted kappa (linear) was 0.80 [95% CI, 0.72–0.89], 0.91 [95% CI, 0.84–0.98], and 0.91 [95% CI, 0.84–0.98] for the Standard Mandard-, Modified Mandard-, and the Becker systems, respectively. The usability was scored on a scale of 8–24 by both raters. The systems were scored accordingly: 47 (Modified Mandard system), 43 (Becker system), and 37 (Standard Mandard system). Conclusion: The Modified Mandard- and Becker systems had excellent interobserver reliability and usability. However, the systems could be improved by a better characterization of the different tiers and tumor morphology.

An increase in the Ki-67 index in neuroendocrine neoplasms over time in relation to prognosis has scarcely been investigated. We aimed to assess whether the Ki-67 index changed over time and also whether a change influenced prognosis. Second, we investigated the difference in the Ki-67 index between primary tumour and metastases. From 1 January 1995 to 31 December 2019, 108 consecutive patients with gastroenteropancreatic tumours were included. Patients were followed with regard to an increase in the Ki-67 index and all-cause mortality. Ki-67 determination of the primary tumour at diagnosis and at the time of radiological progression, including developed metastases, was performed. A significant increase in the Ki-67 index was defined as a doubling of the value at disease progression compared to the value at diagnosis. In addition, in 14 patients, the Ki-67 index of the primary tumour and present metastases at the time of diagnosis was investigated. At diagnosis, there were no differences in the Ki-67 index between primary tumours and metastases (P = .41). Sixty-five patients had a doubling of the Ki-67 index. The median Ki-67 index at the time of progression 17% (1%-90%) vs 5% (1%-60%) at the time of diagnosis (P = .006). A doubling of the Ki-67 index was independently associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio = 2.7 [1.3-6.3], P = 0.02), after adjustment for relevant co-variables including the Ki-67 index at baseline. Doubling of the Ki-67 index at the time of disease progression was associated with a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality. We recommend that a Ki-67 index is obtained whenever disease progression is recorded by demonstrated progression because it may have impact on the choice of treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) of the appendix are often incidentally discovered after appendectomy. Appropriate management is debated. The purpose was to characterize a cohort of 335 appendix NEN and evaluate the risk of recurrence.METHODS: Retrospective collection of data from 335 patients referred to the Neuroendocrine Tumor Center at Rigshospitalet 2000-2019. Appendix goblet cell carcinoids and mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms were excluded. Patients were followed until December 31st, 2019. No patients were lost to follow-up.RESULTS: Sixty-three percent of the patients were female. The median (range) age at diagnosis was 34 (9-92) years. Median follow-up was 66 (1-250) months. Median tumor size was 7 (1-45) mm with 10 (3%) tumors >20 mm. In 18 specimens (5%) resection margins were positive. Mesoappendiceal invasion was found in 113 (35%). Sixty-three (19%) patients underwent right-sided completion hemicolectomy (RHC) after appendectomy according to ENETS guidelines. Among these, 11 (17%) had lymph node metastases in the resected tissue. Further, one patient who underwent initial RHC due to colonic adenocarcinoma had lymph node metastases. All lymph node metastases were detected in patients with serotonin positive tumors. No patients with glucagon positive tumors (n = 85) had lymph node metastases. Mesoappendiceal invasion >3 mm and positive resection margins were associated with presence of lymph node metastases. No recurrences were recorded.CONCLUSION: Following ENETS guidelines may lead to overtreatment of patients with respect to completion RHC. The risk of over- and undertreatment needs to be further evaluated.

Our case concerns a 66-year-old man. After experiencing recurrent episodes of abdominal pain, an initial CT scan, ultrasound and gastroscopy was carried out. All of which showed normal findings. As a consequence of persisting symptoms, another CT scan was performed. This scan revealed a hypodense area in the right lobe of the liver. This was interpreted as a possible haemangioma. Subsequent MRI scans indicated an intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. A final ultrasound-guided liver biopsy was performed and histology demonstrated epitheloid haemangioendothelioma, which was locally advanced and inoperable.

Medullary carcinoma of the colon is a rare variant of colorectal cancer claimed to have a more favorable prognosis than conventional adenocarcinomas. The histopathologic appearance may be difficult to distinguish from poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. The study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic interobserver agreement and to characterize the immunohistochemical and molecular differences between these two subgroups. Fifteen cases initially classified as medullary carcinoma and 30 cases of poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas were included. Two pathologists reviewed the slides independently without knowledge of the original diagnosis and subgrouped the tumors into the two entities. Agreement was reached in 31 of 45 cases (69 %) with kappa = 0.32. An extensive immunohistochemical panel was performed, and KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutational status was assessed. Of the 31 cases with diagnostic agreement, the expression of only MLH-1 along with corresponding expression of PMS-2 differed significantly (p = 0.04). A high rate of BRAF mutations was detected in both subgroups without significant differences. Expression of MLH-1 was superior in dividing the tumors into two separate entities with significant differences in CK20 (p = 0.005) expression and in the rate of BRAF mutations (p = 0.0035). In conclusion, medullary carcinomas of the colon are difficult to discriminate from poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma even with the help of immunohistochemical and molecular analyses. This raises the question whether these morphological subtypes should be maintained or whether an alternative classification of poorly differentiated colorectal adenocarcinomas based on MLH-1 status rather than morphology should be suggested.