Search

Objective Reaction time is a common deficit following concussion, making its evaluation critical during return-to-play protocol. Without proper evaluation, an athlete may return-to-play prematurely, putting them at risk of further injury. Although often assessed, we propose that current clinical testing may not be challenging enough to detect lingering deficits. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine reaction time in concussed individuals three times over a 30-day period through the use of a novel reaction time device consisting of simple, complex, and go/no-go reaction time tasks. Methods Twenty-three concussed subjects completed simple, complex, and go/no-go reaction time tests at three different timepoints: within 7-, 14-, and 30-days of injury, and 21 healthy controls completed the three reaction time tasks during a single session. Results Independent t-tests revealed that for the simple reaction time task, concussed participants were only significantly slower at session 1 (p  = .002) when compared to controls. Complex reaction time task results showed concussed participants to be significantly slower at session 1 (p  = .0002), session 2 (p  = .001), and session 3 (p  = .002). Go/no-go results showed concussed participants to be significantly slower than controls at session 1 (p  = .003), session 2 (p  = .001), and session 3 (p  = .001). Conclusions Concussed individuals display prolonged reaction time deficits beyond the acute phase of injury, illustrated using increasingly complex tasks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The current tendency to avoid at all cost the separation of children from their own homes can have a destructive effect on casework practice.

Serious illness or hospitalization of a parent is potentially destructive to the mental health of the child. Stress is caused by both the separation and the illness itself. If the physician does not ensure that the situation is explained to the child, it is likely the child will be confused and frightened and any attempts at clarification will be blocked in the attendant family dysfunction. The general principles of prevention are to share the facts of the situation with the child and to allow him his natural and varied reactions. The family interview is useful in clearing up misunderstandings, sharing feelings and working out family roles.