Search

Your search keyword '"Wildt, L."' showing total 796 results
Start Over Author "Wildt, L."

Refine your results

more »

more »

more »

more »
796 results on '"Wildt, L."'

12. New and emerging contraceptive options: a focus on transdermal contraception

Author

Böttcher B and Wildt L

Subjects
Gynecology and obstetrics, RG1-991
Abstract

Bettina Böttcher, Ludwig WildtDepartment of Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, AustriaAbstract: Transdermal contraception is a convenient way of hormonal contraception that allows weekly application of a patch for 3 consecutive weeks followed by a patch-free week. Efficacy, side effects, advantages, and disadvantages as well as patient satisfaction with this formulation are discussed in this short review. The first patch, introduced in 2002, contained ethinylestradiol and norelgestromin. Recently, a new patch containing gestodene as the gestagen component has been developed. Early data for this formulation are presented.Keywords: transdermal contraception, skin patch

Published
2014

23. P–647 How do migraine attacks change during puberty?

Author

Boettcher, B, primary, Kyprianou, A, additional, Wildt, L, additional, Lechner, C, additional, Kößler, M, additional, Neururer, S, additional, Bettina, T, additional, Matthias, B, additional, Rostasy, K, additional, and Rauchenzauner, M, additional

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

34. Survey of Fertility Preservation Options Available to Patients With Cancer Around the Globe

Author

Rashedi, A.S., Roo, S.F. de, Ataman, L.M., Edmonds, M.E., Silva, A.A., Scarella, A., Horbaczewska, A., Anazodo, A., Arvas, A., Carvalho, B., Sartorio, C., Beerendonk, C.C.M., Diaz-Garcia, C., Suh, C.S., Melo, C., Andersen, C., Motta, E., Greenblatt, E.M., Moer, E. Van, Zand, E., Reis, F.M., Sanchez, F., Terrado, G., Rodrigues, J.K., Meneses, E.S.J. Marcos de, Smitz, J., Medrano, J., Lee, J.R., Winkler-Crepaz, K., Smith, K., Melo, E.S.L.H. Ferreira, Wildt, L., Salama, M., Andres, M, Bourlon, M.T., Vega, M., Chehin, M.B., Vos, M de, Khrouf, M., Suzuki, N., Azmy, O., Fontoura, P., Campos-Junior, P.H.A., Mallmann, P., Azambuja, R., Marinho, R.M., Anderson, R.A., Jach, R., Antunes, R.A., Mitchell, R., Fathi, R., Adiga, S.K., Takae, S., Kim, S.H., Romero, S., Grieco, S. Chedid, Shaulov, T., Furui, T., Almeida-Santos, T., Nelen, W., Jayasinghe, Y., Sugishita, Y., Woodruff, T.K., Rashedi, A.S., Roo, S.F. de, Ataman, L.M., Edmonds, M.E., Silva, A.A., Scarella, A., Horbaczewska, A., Anazodo, A., Arvas, A., Carvalho, B., Sartorio, C., Beerendonk, C.C.M., Diaz-Garcia, C., Suh, C.S., Melo, C., Andersen, C., Motta, E., Greenblatt, E.M., Moer, E. Van, Zand, E., Reis, F.M., Sanchez, F., Terrado, G., Rodrigues, J.K., Meneses, E.S.J. Marcos de, Smitz, J., Medrano, J., Lee, J.R., Winkler-Crepaz, K., Smith, K., Melo, E.S.L.H. Ferreira, Wildt, L., Salama, M., Andres, M, Bourlon, M.T., Vega, M., Chehin, M.B., Vos, M de, Khrouf, M., Suzuki, N., Azmy, O., Fontoura, P., Campos-Junior, P.H.A., Mallmann, P., Azambuja, R., Marinho, R.M., Anderson, R.A., Jach, R., Antunes, R.A., Mitchell, R., Fathi, R., Adiga, S.K., Takae, S., Kim, S.H., Romero, S., Grieco, S. Chedid, Shaulov, T., Furui, T., Almeida-Santos, T., Nelen, W., Jayasinghe, Y., Sugishita, Y., and Woodruff, T.K.

Abstract

Contains fulltext : 220977.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access), Purpose: Oncofertility focuses on providing fertility and endocrine-sparing options to patients who undergo life-preserving but gonadotoxic cancer treatment. The resources needed to meet patient demand often are fragmented along disciplinary lines. We quantify assets and gaps in oncofertility care on a global scale. Methods: Survey-based questionnaires were provided to 191 members of the Oncofertility Consortium Global Partners Network, a National Institutes of Health-funded organization. Responses were analyzed to measure trends and regional subtleties about patient oncofertility experiences and to analyze barriers to care at sites that provide oncofertility services. Results: Sixty-three responses were received (response rate, 25%), and 40 were analyzed from oncofertility centers in 28 countries. Thirty of 40 survey results (75%) showed that formal referral processes and psychological care are provided to patients at the majority of sites. Fourteen of 23 respondents (61%) stated that some fertility preservation services are not offered because of cultural and legal barriers. The growth of oncofertility and its capacity to improve the lives of cancer survivors around the globe relies on concentrated efforts to increase awareness, promote collaboration, share best practices, and advocate for research funding. Conclusion: This survey reveals global and regional successes and challenges and provides insight into what is needed to advance the field and make the discussion of fertility preservation and endocrine health a standard component of the cancer treatment plan. As the field of oncofertility continues to develop around the globe, regular assessment of both international and regional barriers to quality care must continue to guide process improvements.

Published
2020

35. Creating a global community of practice for oncofertility

Author

Ataman, LM, Rodrigues, JK, Marinho, RM, Caetano, JPJ, Chehin, MB, Alves da Motta, EL, Serafini, P, Suzuki, N, Furui, T, Takae, S, Sugishita, Y, Morishige, KI, Almeida-Santos, T, Melo, C, Buzaglo, K, Irwin, K, Hamish Wallace, W, Anderson, RA, Mitchell, RT, Telfer, EE, Adiga, SK, Anazodo, A, Stern, C, Sullivan, E, Jayasinghe, Y, Orme, L, Cohn, R, McLachlan, R, Deans, R, Agresta, F, Gerstl, B, Ledger, WL, Robker, RL, de Meneses e Silva, JM, Melo e Silva, LHF, Lunardi, FO, Lee, JR, Suh, CS, de Vos, M, van Moer, E, Stoop, D, Vloeberghs, V, Smitz, J, Tournaye, H, Wildt, L, Winkler-Crepaz, K, Andersen, CY, Smith, BM, Smith, K, Woodruff, TK, Ataman, LM, Rodrigues, JK, Marinho, RM, Caetano, JPJ, Chehin, MB, Alves da Motta, EL, Serafini, P, Suzuki, N, Furui, T, Takae, S, Sugishita, Y, Morishige, KI, Almeida-Santos, T, Melo, C, Buzaglo, K, Irwin, K, Hamish Wallace, W, Anderson, RA, Mitchell, RT, Telfer, EE, Adiga, SK, Anazodo, A, Stern, C, Sullivan, E, Jayasinghe, Y, Orme, L, Cohn, R, McLachlan, R, Deans, R, Agresta, F, Gerstl, B, Ledger, WL, Robker, RL, de Meneses e Silva, JM, Melo e Silva, LHF, Lunardi, FO, Lee, JR, Suh, CS, de Vos, M, van Moer, E, Stoop, D, Vloeberghs, V, Smitz, J, Tournaye, H, Wildt, L, Winkler-Crepaz, K, Andersen, CY, Smith, BM, Smith, K, and Woodruff, TK

Abstract

Fertility preservation in the cancer setting, known as oncofertility, is a field that requires cross-disciplinary interaction between physicians, basic scientists, clinical researchers, ethicists, lawyers, educators, and religious leaders. Funded by the National Institutes of Health, the Oncofertility Consortium (OC) was formed to be a scientifically grounded, transparent, and altruistic resource, both intellectual and monetary, for building this new field of practice capable of addressing the unique needs of young patients with cancer. The OC has expanded its attention to include other nonmalignant conditions that can threaten fertility, and the work of the OC now extends around the globe, involving partners who together have created a community of shared effort, resources, and practices. The OC creates materials that are translated, disseminated, and amended by all participants in the field, and local programs of excellence have developed worldwide to accelerate the pace and improve the quality of oncofertility research and practice. Here we review the global oncofertility programs and the capacity building activities that strengthen these research and clinical programs, ultimately improving patient care.

Published
2020

36. Survey of Fertility Preservation Options Available to Patients With Cancer Around the Globe

Author

Rashedi, AS, de Roo, SF, Ataman, LM, Edmonds, ME, Silva, AA, Scarella, A, Horbaczewska, A, Anazodo, A, Arvas, A, de Carvalho, BR, Sartorio, C, Beerendonk, CCM, Diaz-Garcia, C, Suh, CS, Melo, C, Andersen, CY, Motta, E, Greenblatt, EM, Van Moer, E, Zand, E, Reis, FM, Sanchez, F, Terrado, G, Rodrigues, JK, de Meneses e Silva, JM, Smitz, J, Medrano, J, Lee, JR, Winkler-Crepaz, K, Smith, K, Ferreira Melo e Silva, LH, Wildt, L, Salama, M, del Mar Andres, M, Bourlon, MT, Vega, M, Chehin, MB, De Vos, M, Khrouf, M, Suzuki, N, Azmy, O, Fontoura, P, Almeida Campos-Junior, PH, Mallmann, P, Azambuja, R, Marinho, RM, Anderson, RA, Jach, R, Antunes, RDA, Mitchell, R, Fathi, R, Adiga, SK, Takae, S, Kim, SH, Romero, S, Grieco, SC, Shaulov, T, Furui, T, Almeida-Santos, T, Nelen, W, Jayasinghe, Y, Sugishita, Y, Woodruff, TK, Rashedi, AS, de Roo, SF, Ataman, LM, Edmonds, ME, Silva, AA, Scarella, A, Horbaczewska, A, Anazodo, A, Arvas, A, de Carvalho, BR, Sartorio, C, Beerendonk, CCM, Diaz-Garcia, C, Suh, CS, Melo, C, Andersen, CY, Motta, E, Greenblatt, EM, Van Moer, E, Zand, E, Reis, FM, Sanchez, F, Terrado, G, Rodrigues, JK, de Meneses e Silva, JM, Smitz, J, Medrano, J, Lee, JR, Winkler-Crepaz, K, Smith, K, Ferreira Melo e Silva, LH, Wildt, L, Salama, M, del Mar Andres, M, Bourlon, MT, Vega, M, Chehin, MB, De Vos, M, Khrouf, M, Suzuki, N, Azmy, O, Fontoura, P, Almeida Campos-Junior, PH, Mallmann, P, Azambuja, R, Marinho, RM, Anderson, RA, Jach, R, Antunes, RDA, Mitchell, R, Fathi, R, Adiga, SK, Takae, S, Kim, SH, Romero, S, Grieco, SC, Shaulov, T, Furui, T, Almeida-Santos, T, Nelen, W, Jayasinghe, Y, Sugishita, Y, and Woodruff, TK

Abstract

PURPOSE: In the accompanying article, "Analysis of Fertility Preservation Options Available to Patients With Cancer Around the Globe," we showed that specific fertility preservation services may not be offered at various sites around the world because of cultural and legal barriers. We assessed global and regional experiences as well as the legal status of third-party reproduction and adoption to serve as a comprehensive international data set and resource for groups that wish to begin oncofertility interventions. METHODS: We provide data on the legalities of third-party assisted reproductive technologies and other family-building options in the 28 oncofertility-practicing countries surveyed. RESULTS: We found regional and country differences that will be important in the development of tailored resources for physicians and for patient brochures that are sensitive to these local restrictions and cultural norms. CONCLUSION: Because many patients first consult Web-based materials, the formal assessment of the availability of these options provides members of the global oncofertility community with data to which they might otherwise not have ready access to better serve their patients.

Published
2020

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results