Search

Background: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is used for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic hypercapnia. However, evidence for clinical efficacy and optimal management of therapy is limited.Target Audience: Patients with COPD, clinicians who care for them, and policy makers.Methods: We summarized evidence addressing five PICO (patients, intervention, comparator, and outcome) questions. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach was used to evaluate the certainty in evidence and generate actionable recommendations. Recommendations were formulated by a panel of pulmonary and sleep physicians, respiratory therapists, and methodologists using the Evidence-to-Decision framework.Recommendations: 1) We suggest the use of nocturnal NIV in addition to usual care for patients with chronic stable hypercapnic COPD (conditional recommendation, moderate certainty); 2) we suggest that patients with chronic stable hypercapnic COPD undergo screening for obstructive sleep apnea before initiation of long-term NIV (conditional recommendation, very low certainty); 3) we suggest not initiating long-term NIV during an admission for acute-on-chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure, favoring instead reassessment for NIV at 2-4 weeks after resolution (conditional recommendation, low certainty); 4) we suggest not using an in-laboratory overnight polysomnogram to titrate NIV in patients with chronic stable hypercapnic COPD who are initiating NIV (conditional recommendation, very low certainty); and 5) we suggest NIV with targeted normalization of PaCO2 in patients with hypercapnic COPD on long-term NIV (conditional recommendation, low certainty).Conclusions: This expert panel provides evidence-based recommendations addressing the use of NIV in patients with COPD and chronic stable hypercapnic respiratory failure.

LAMA2-related muscular dystrophy (LAMA2-MD) and SELENON(SEPN1)-related congenital myopathy (SELENON-RM) are rare neuromuscular diseases with respiratory impairment from a young age. Prospective natural history studies are needed for prevalence estimations, respiratory characterization, optimizing clinical care and selecting outcome measures for trial readiness. Our prospective 1.5-year natural history study included spirometry (forced vital capacity (FVC); difference between upright and supine vital capacity (dVC)), respiratory muscle strength tests (sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP)) (age≥5 years), and diaphragm ultrasound (thickness; thickening; echogenicity; all ages). Twenty-six LAMA2-MD patients (M = 8, median 21 [9; 31] years) and 11 SELENON-RM patients (M = 8, 20 [10; 33] years) were included. At baseline, 17 (85 %) LAMA2-MD (FVC%: 59 % [33; 68]) and all SELENON-RM patients (FVC%: 34 % [31; 46]) had an impaired respiratory function (FVC%<80 %). Nine (35 %) LAMA2-MD and eight (73 %) SELENON-RM patients received mechanical ventilation at baseline, and two additional SELENON-RM patients started during follow-up. Contrarily to LAMA2-MD, SELENON-RM patients had severe diaphragm atrophy (diaphragm thickness z-score: 2.5 [-3.1; −2.1]) and dysfunction (diaphragm thickness ratio: 1.2 [1.0; 1.7]; dVC: 30 % [7.7; 41]). SNIP was low in both neuromuscular diseases and correlated with motor function. In SELENON-RM, respiratory function decreased during follow-up. The majority of LAMA2-MD and all SELENON-RM patients had respiratory impairment. SELENON-RM patients showed lower respiratory function which was progressive, more prevalent mechanical ventilation, and more severe diaphragm atrophy and dysfunction than LAMA2-MD patients. Spirometry (FVC%, dVC) and respiratory muscle strength tests (SNIP) are useful in clinical care and as outcome measure in clinical trials. NCT04478981. • The majority of LAMA2-MD and all SELENON-RM patients have respiratory impairment. • This is caused by diaphragm weakness, accessory muscle weakness and scoliosis. • In SELENON-RM, respiratory impairment was progressive and disproportionate. • SELENON-RM patients had a striking diaphragm atrophy and dysfunction at a young age. • Respiratory testing is useful in clinical care and as outcome measure in trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The use of noninvasive intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure remains controversial as long-term data are almost lacking. The aim was to compare the outcome of 2-year home-based nocturnal NIPPV in addition to rehabilitation (NIPPV + PR) with rehabilitation alone (PR) in COPD patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure. Methods Sixty-six patients could be analyzed for the two-year home-based follow-up period. Differences in change between the NIPPV + PR and PR group were assessed by a linear mixed effects model with a random effect on the intercept, and adjustment for baseline values. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life (HRQoL); secondary outcomes were mood state, dyspnea, gas exchange, functional status, pulmonary function, and exacerbation frequency. Results Although the addition of NIPPV did not significantly improve the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire compared to rehabilitation alone (mean difference in change between groups -1.3 points (95% CI: -9.7 to 7.4)), the addition of NIPPV did improve HRQoL assessed with the Maugeri Respiratory Failure questionnaire (-13.4% (-22.7 to -4.2; p = 0.005)), mood state (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale -4.0 points (-7.8 to 0.0; p = 0.05)), dyspnea (Medical Research Council -0.4 points (-0.8 to -0.0; p = 0.05)), daytime arterial blood gases (PaCO2 -0.4 kPa (-0.8 to -0.2; p = 0.01); PaO2 0.8 kPa (0.0 to 1.5; p = 0.03)), 6-minute walking distance (77.3 m (46.4 to 108.0; p < 0.001)), Groningen Activity and Restriction scale (-3.8 points (-7.4 to -0.4; p = 0.03)), and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (115 ml (19 to 211; p = 0.019)). Exacerbation frequency was not changed. Conclusions The addition of NIPPV to pulmonary rehabilitation for 2 years in severe COPD patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure improves HRQoL, mood, dyspnea, gas exchange, exercise tolerance and lung function decline. The benefits increase further with time. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.Gov (ID NCT00135538).

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. This study systematically reviews the effects of oral appliance therapy (OAT) on a broad spectrum of cardiovascular outcomes. A literature search was performed up to December 31st 2016. Twenty-five relevant full-text articles were retrieved. Sixteen articles were considered methodologically sufficient, including 11 randomized controlled trials. Pooled data of the RCTs showed significant reductions in daytime systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared to baseline, but no significant reductions in heart rate, except for daytime heart rate when compared to inactive/placebo OAT. OAT and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) were equally effective in reducing blood pressure. Studies assessing the effect of OAT on heart rate variability, circulating cardiovascular biomarkers, and endothelial function and arterial stiffness, generally involved small numbers of patients, and were heterogeneous and inconclusive. Studies assessing the effect of OAT on cardiac function showed no effects on echocardiographic outcomes. One observational study showed that OAT was as effective as CPAP in reducing cardiovascular death. It could be speculated that OAT may lead to a reduction in long-term cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in OSA patients. However, further methodologically high quality, longitudinal studies are warranted to address this key question. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]