Search

Device-assisted left atrial appendage exclusion plays a crucial role in the prevention of fatal ischemic complications in patients with atrial fibrillation and contraindications to anticoagulation treatment. Various devices with different safety profiles and device-related complications are available in daily practice to perform this procedure. In this review, the anatomy, physiology, and functions of the left atrial appendage were detailed, and all available devices used for epicardial and endocardial exclusion of the left atrial appendage and their clinical outcomes were discussed. Future research should aim to further investigate the long-term effects of left atrial appendage exclusion on body homeostasis, blood coagulation, and cardiac function.

Competing Interests: The authors report no conflict of interest.

Introduction: Posterolateral thoracotomy was the access of choice in surgical treatment of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) for many years before the introduction of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). The latter is thought to reduce postoperative pain and improve musculoskeletal system status. However, it carries a potential risk of conversion to thoracotomy., Aim: To evaluate the rate, reasons and outcomes of VATS conversion to thoracotomy in surgical PDA patients., Material and Methods: From 2012 to 2017, 112 children were qualified for VATS closure of symptomatic PDA. Among them, 19 (16.9%) with the median age of 19.4 months required conversion to thoracotomy. The predominant reasons for conversion, early mortality and morbidity as well as late survival were evaluated., Results: The overall conversion rate was 16.9% with an evident learning curve as it decreased significantly from more than 20% at the beginning to approximately 10% in the last 2 years. The predominant reasons were incomplete PDA closure ( n = 6; 31.6%) followed by ductal bleeding after clip application ( n = 5; 26.3%) and inadequate visualization ( n = 5). One child died 48 h after the surgery due to acute cardiopulmonary failure (mortality 5.9%). All patients required postoperative chest tube insertion, and two of them developed postoperative pneumothorax. Neither deaths nor severe adverse events were noted throughout the follow-up period., Conclusions: The rate of VATS PDA closure conversion to standard thoracotomy features a learning curve. Although it must be considered as a serious complication, probably it does not negatively affect either early the mortality rate or long-term survival.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the early and mid-term clinical results, the device performance, and the mid-term re-intervention rates of patients suffering blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) managed by a multidisciplinary team in a low-volume BTAI centre., Methods: This was a retrospective observational study in a tertiary hospital setting. From December 2005 to March 2016, all patients over 18 years old admitted with BTAI were included in the study. No exclusion criteria were applied. The study data were collected and analysed retrospectively. Follow-up of survivors included computed tomography imaging 3 and 9 months post-procedure, then annually., Results: Twenty-eight patients were included in the study. Their mean age was 42 ± 16 years and 89% were male. A contained aortic rupture was diagnosed in 20 patients, a Stanford type B dissection in six, and intramural haematoma in two patients. Multidisciplinary evaluations were performed and an intervention was indicated in 25 patients (89%), four of whom died before the intervention. Nineteen patients underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair of the descending thoracic aorta and two patients underwent a frozen elephant trunk procedure. The procedures were performed 0.7 ± 1.2 days after injury. All procedures were successful. There were no device related complications. The post-operative 30 day mortality was 5%, with one patient dying on the day of operation from other vascular injuries. The 30 day mortality of all patients was 18%. The median mid-term follow-up period was 786 days. All 30 day survivors survived the follow-up period. The mid-term imaging showed stable results in 19 patients. Two patients required frozen elephant trunk procedures after 240 and 681 days and both procedures were successful., Conclusions: In a low volume centre, a multidisciplinary team using a standardised protocol with the endovascular first approach demonstrated excellent outcomes, similar to those of large centres. If the aortic trauma is adequately managed, the patient's outcome is closely related to the additional trauma., (Copyright © 2017 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)