Search

Background Dialysis modalities and their various treatment schedules result from complex compromises ('trade-offs') between medical, financial, technological, ergonomic, and ecological factors. This study targets summarizing the mutual influence of these trade-offs on (trans)portable, wearable, or even (partially) implantable haemodialysis (HD) systems, identify what systems are in development, and how they might improve quality of life (QoL) for patients with kidney failure. Methods HD as defined by international standard IEC 60601–2-16 was applied on a PUBMED database query regarding (trans)portable, wearable, and (partly) implantable HD systems. Out of 159 search results, 24 were included and scanned for specific HD devices and/or HD systems in development. Additional information about weight, size, and development status was collected by the internet and/or contacting manufacturers. International airplane hand baggage criteria formed the boundary between transportable and portable. Technology readiness levels (TRLs) were assigned by combining TRL scales from the European Union and NATO medical staff. Results The query revealed 13 devices/projects: seven transportable (six TRL9, one TRL5); two portable (one TRL6–7, one TRL4); two wearable (one TRL6, one frozen); and two partly implantable (one TRL4–5, one TRL2–3). Discussion Three main categories of technical approaches were distinguished: single-pass, dialysate regenerating, and implantable HD filter with extracorporeal dialysate regeneration (in climbing order of mobility). Conclusions Kidneys facilitate mobility by excreting strongly concentrated waste solutes with minimal water loss. Mimicking this kidney function can increase HD system mobility. Dialysate-regenerating HD systems are enablers for portability/wearability and, combined with durable implantable HD filters (once available), they may enable HD without needles or intravascular catheters. However, lack of funding severely hampers progress. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) offers the potential to provide objective data for evaluating tissue perfusion of flaps and reduce the incidence of postoperative necrosis. Consensus on ICGA protocols and information on factors that have an influence on fluorescence intensity is lacking. The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive insight of in vivo and ex vivo evaluation of factors influencing the fluorescence intensity when using ICGA during reconstructive flap surgery. Methods. A systematic literature search was conducted to provide a comprehensive overview of currently used ICGA protocols in reconstructive flap surgery. Additionally, ex vivo experiments were performed to further investigate the practical influence of potentially relevant factors. Results. Factors that are considered important in ICGA protocols, as well as factors that might influence fluorescence intensity are scarcely reported. The ex vivo experiments demonstrated that fluorescence intensity was significantly related to dose, working distance, angle, penetration depth, and ambient light. Conclusions. This study identified factors that significantly influence the fluorescence intensity of ICGA. Applying a weight-adjusted ICG dose seems preferable over a fixed dose, recommended working distances are advocated, and the imaging head during ICGA should be positioned in an angle of 60° to 90° without significantly influencing the fluorescence intensity. All of these factors should be considered and reported when using ICGA for tissue perfusion assessment during reconstructive flap surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major cause of early death worldwide. By 2030, 14.5 million people will have end-stage kidney disease (ESKD, or CKD stage 5), yet only 5.4 million will receive kidney replacement therapy (KRT) due to economic, social, and political factors. Even for those who are offered KRT by various means of dialysis, the life expectancy remains far too low., Observation: Researchers from different fields of artificial organs collaborate to overcome the challenges of creating products such as Wearable and/or Implantable Artificial Kidneys capable of providing long-term effective physiologic kidney functions such as removal of uremic toxins, electrolyte homeostasis, and fluid regulation. A focus should be to develop easily accessible, safe, and inexpensive KRT options that enable a good quality of life and will also be available for patients in less-developed regions of the world., Conclusions: Hence, it is required to discuss some of the limits and burdens of transplantation and different techniques of dialysis, including those performed at home. Furthermore, hurdles must be considered and overcome to develop wearable and implantable artificial kidney devices that can help to improve the quality of life and life expectancy of patients with CKD., (© 2022 The Authors. Artificial Organs published by International Center for Artificial Organ and Transplantation (ICAOT) and Wiley Periodicals LLC.)