Search

The primary functions of most virus capsids are to protect the viral genome in the extra-cellular milieu and deliver it to the host. In contrast, the capsids of fungal viruses, like the cores of all other known double stranded RNA viruses, are not involved in host recognition but do shield their genomes, and they also carry out transcription and replication. Nascent (+) strands are extruded from transcribing virions. The capsids of the yeast virus L-A are composed of Gag (capsid protein; 76 kDa), with a few molecules of Gag-Pol (170 kDa). Analysis of these 420 A diameter shells and those of the fungal P4 virus by cryo-electron microscopy and image reconstruction shows that they share the same novel icosahedral structure. Both capsids consist of 60 equivalent Gag dimers, whose two subunits occupy non-equivalent bonding environments. Stoichiometry data on other double-stranded RNA viruses indicate that the 120-subunit structure is widespread, implying that this molecular architecture has features that are particularly favorable to the design of a capsid that is also a biosynthetic compartment.

Recognition that common human amyloidoses are prion diseases makes the use of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae prion model systems to screen for possible anti-prion components of increasing importance. [PSI+] and [URE3] are amyloid-based prions of Sup35p and Ure2p, respectively. Yeast has at least six anti-prion systems that together cure nearly all [PSI+] and [URE3] prions arising in their absence. We made a GAL- promoted bank of 14,913 human open reading frames in a yeast shuttle plasmid and isolated 20 genes whose expression cures [PSI+] or [URE3]. PRPF19 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase that cures [URE3] if its U-box is intact. DNAJA1 is a J protein that cures [PSI+] unless its interaction with Hsp70s is defective. Human Bag5 efficiently cures [URE3] and [PSI+]. Bag family proteins share a 110 to 130 residue "BAG domain"; Bag 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 each have one BAG domain while Bag5 has five BAG domains. Two BAG domains are necessary for curing [PSI+], but one can suffice to cure [URE3]. Although most Bag proteins affect autophagy in mammalian cells, mutations blocking autophagy in yeast do not affect Bag5 curing of [PSI+] or [URE3]. Curing by Bag proteins depends on their interaction with Hsp70s, impairing their role, with Hsp104 and Sis1, in the amyloid filament cleavage necessary for prion propagation. Since Bag5 curing is reduced by overproduction of Sis1, we propose that Bag5 cures prions by blocking Sis1 access to Hsp70s in its role with Hsp104 in filament cleavage.

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Prions are infectious proteins, mostly having a self-propagating amyloid (filamentous protein polymer) structure consisting of an abnormal form of a normally soluble protein. These prions arise spontaneously in the cell without known reason, and their effects were generally considered to be fatal based on prion diseases in humans or mammals. However, the wide array of prion studies in yeast including filamentous fungi revealed that their effects can range widely, from lethal to very mild (even cryptic) or functional, depending on the nature of the prion protein and the specific prion variant (or strain) made by the same prion protein but with a different conformation. This prion biology is affected by an array of molecular chaperone systems, such as Hsp40, Hsp70, Hsp104, and combinations of them. In parallel with the systems required for prion propagation, yeast has multiple anti-prion systems, constantly working in the normal cell without overproduction of or a deficiency in any protein, which have negative effects on prions by blocking their formation, curing many prions after they arise, preventing prion infections, and reducing the cytotoxicity produced by prions. From the protectors of nascent polypeptides (Ssb1/2p, Zuo1p, and Ssz1p) to the protein sequesterase (Btn2p), the disaggregator (Hsp104), and the mysterious Cur1p, normal levels of each can cure the prion variants arising in its absence. The controllers of mRNA quality, nonsense-mediated mRNA decay proteins (Upf1, 2, 3), can cure newly formed prion variants by association with a prion-forming protein. The regulator of the inositol pyrophosphate metabolic pathway (Siw14p) cures certain prion variants by lowering the levels of certain organic compounds. Some of these proteins have other cellular functions (e.g., Btn2), while others produce an anti-prion effect through their primary role in the normal cell (e.g., ribosomal chaperones). Thus, these anti-prion actions are the innate defense strategy against prions. Here, we outline the anti-prion systems in yeast that produce innate immunity to prions by a multi-layered operation targeting each step of prion development.

All variants of the yeast prions [PSI+] and [URE3] are detrimental to their hosts, as shown by the dramatic slowing of growth (or even lethality) of a majority, by the rare occurrence in wild isolates of even the mildest variants and by the absence of reproducible benefits of these prions. To deal with the prion problem, the host has evolved an array of anti-prion systems, acting in normal cells (without overproduction or deficiency of any component) to block prion transmission from other cells, to lower the rates of spontaneous prion generation, to cure most prions as they arise and to limit the damage caused by those variants that manage to elude these (necessarily) imperfect defenses. Here we review the properties of prion protein sequence polymorphisms Btn2, Cur1, Hsp104, Upf1,2,3, ribosome-associated chaperones, inositol polyphosphates, Sis1 and Lug1, which are responsible for these anti-prion effects. We recently showed that the combined action of ribosome-associated chaperones, nonsense-mediated decay factors and the Hsp104 disaggregase lower the frequency of [PSI+] appearance as much as 5000-fold. Moreover, while Btn2 and Cur1 are anti-prion factors against [URE3] and an unrelated artificial prion, they promote [PSI+] prion generation and propagation.

[ PSI + ] and [URE3] are prions of Saccharomyces cerevisiae based on amyloids of Sup35p and Ure2p, respectively. In normal cells, antiprion systems block prion formation, cure many prions that arise, prevent infection by prions, and prevent toxicity of those prions that escape the other systems. The upf1Δ , ssz1Δ , and hsp104 T160M single mutants each develop [ PSI + ] at 10- to 15-fold, but the triple mutant spontaneously generates [ PSI + ] at up to ∼5,000-fold the wild-type rate. Most such [ PSI + ] variants are cured by restoration of any one of the three defective antiprion systems, defining a previously unknown type of [ PSI + ] variant and proving that these three antiprion systems act independently. Generation of [ PSI + ] variants stable in wild-type cells is also increased in upf1Δ ssz1Δ hsp104 T160M strains 25- to 500-fold. Btn2 and Cur1 each cure 90% of [URE3] prions generated in their absence, but we find that btn2Δ or cur1Δ diminishes the frequency of [ PSI + ] generation in an otherwise wild-type strain. Most [ PSI + ] isolates in a wild-type strain are destabilized on transfer to a btn2Δ or cur1Δ host. Single upf1Δ or hsp104 T160M mutants show the effects of btn2Δ or cur1Δ but not upf1Δ ssz1Δ hsp104 T160M or ssz1Δ hsp104 T160M strains. The disparate action of Btn2 on [URE3] and [ PSI + ] may be a result of [ PSI + ]'s generally higher seed number and lower amyloid structural stability compared with [URE3]. Thus, prion generation is not a rare event, but the escape of a nascent prion from the surveillance by the antiprion systems is indeed rare.

The yeast prions (infectious proteins) [URE3] and [PSI+] are essentially non-functional (or even toxic) amyloid forms of Ure2p and Sup35p, whose normal function is in nitrogen catabolite repression and translation termination, respectively. Yeast has an array of systems working in normal cells that largely block infection with prions, block most prion formation, cure most nascent prions and mitigate the toxic effects of those prions that escape the first three types of systems. Here we review recent progress in defining these anti-prion systems, how they work and how they are regulated. Polymorphisms of the prion domains partially block infection with prions. Ribosome-associated chaperones ensure proper folding of nascent proteins, thus reducing [PSI+] prion formation and curing many [PSI+] variants that do form. Btn2p is a sequestering protein which gathers [URE3] amyloid filaments to one place in the cells so that the prion is often lost by progeny cells. Proteasome impairment produces massive overexpression of Btn2p and paralog Cur1p, resulting in [URE3] curing. Inversely, increased proteasome activity, by derepression of proteasome component gene transcription or by 60S ribosomal subunit gene mutation, prevents prion curing by Btn2p or Cur1p. The nonsense-mediated decay proteins (Upf1,2,3) cure many nascent [PSI+] variants by associating with Sup35p directly. Normal levels of the disaggregating chaperone Hsp104 can also cure many [PSI+] prion variants. By keeping the cellular levels of certain inositol polyphosphates / pyrophosphates low, Siw14p cures certain [PSI+] variants. It is hoped that exploration of the yeast innate immunity to prions will lead to discovery of similar systems in humans., (© 2021. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.)

[URE3] is a prion of the nitrogen catabolism controller, Ure2p, and [PSI+] is a prion of the translation termination factor Sup35p in S. cerevisiae. Btn2p cures [URE3] by sequestration of Ure2p amyloid filaments. Cur1p, paralogous to Btn2p, also cures [URE3], but by a different (unknown) mechanism. We find that an array of mutations impairing proteasome assembly or MG132 inhibition of proteasome activity result in loss of [URE3]. In proportion to their prion-curing effects, each mutation affecting proteasomes elevates the cellular concentration of the anti-prion proteins Btn2 and Cur1. Of >4,600 proteins detected by SILAC, Btn2p was easily the most overexpressed in a pre9Δ (α3 core subunit) strain. Indeed, deletion of BTN2 and CUR1 prevents the prion-curing effects of proteasome impairment. Surprisingly, the 15 most unstable yeast proteins are not increased in pre9Δ cells suggesting altered proteasome specificity rather than simple inactivation. Hsp42, a chaperone that cooperates with Btn2 and Cur1 in curing [URE3], is also necessary for the curing produced by proteasome defects, although Hsp42p levels are not substantially altered by a proteasome defect. We find that pre9Δ and proteasome chaperone mutants that most efficiently lose [URE3], do not destabilize [PSI+] or alter cellular levels of Sup35p. A tof2 mutation or deletion likewise destabilizes [URE3], and elevates Btn2p, suggesting that Tof2p deficiency inactivates proteasomes. We suggest that when proteasomes are saturated with denatured/misfolded proteins, their reduced degradation of Btn2p and Cur1p automatically upregulates these aggregate-handling systems to assist in the clean-up., (Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Genetics Society of America 2021.)

[URE3] is an amyloid-based prion of Ure2p, a negative regulator of poor nitrogen source catabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Overproduced Btn2p or its paralog Cur1p, in processes requiring Hsp42, cure the [URE3] prion. Btn2p cures by collecting Ure2p amyloid filaments at one place in the cell. We find that rpl4aΔ, rpl21aΔ, rpl21bΔ, rpl11bΔ, and rpl16bΔ (large ribosomal subunit proteins) or ubr2Δ (ubiquitin ligase targeting Rpn4p, an activator of proteasome genes) reduce curing by overproduced Btn2p or Cur1p. Impaired curing in ubr2Δ or rpl21bΔ is restored by an rpn4Δ mutation. No effect of rps14aΔ or rps30bΔ on curing was observed, indicating that 60S subunit deficiency specifically impairs curing. Levels of Hsp42p, Sis1p, or Btn3p are unchanged in rpl4aΔ, rpl21bΔ, or ubr2Δ mutants. Overproduction of Cur1p or Btn2p was enhanced in rpn4Δ and hsp42Δ mutants, lower in ubr2Δ strains, and restored to above wild-type levels in rpn4Δ ubr2Δ strains. As in the wild-type, Ure2N-GFP colocalizes with Btn2-RFP in rpl4aΔ, rpl21bΔ, or ubr2Δ strains, but not in hsp42Δ. Btn2p/Cur1p overproduction cures [URE3] variants with low seed number, but seed number is not increased in rpl4aΔ, rpl21bΔ or ubr2Δ mutants. Knockouts of genes required for the protein sorting function of Btn2p did not affect curing of [URE3], nor did inactivation of the Hsp104 prion-curing activity. Overactivity of the ubiquitin/proteasome system, resulting from 60S subunit deficiency or ubr2Δ, may impair Cur1p and Btn2p curing of [URE3] by degrading Cur1p, Btn2p or another component of these curing systems., (Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Genetics Society of America 2021. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.)

The yeast prion [PSI+] is a self-propagating amyloid of the translation termination factor, Sup35p. For known pathogenic prions, such as [PSI+], a single protein can form an array of different amyloid structures (prion variants) each stably inherited and with differing biological properties. The ribosome-associated chaperones, Ssb1/2p (Hsp70s), and RAC (Zuo1p (Hsp40) and Ssz1p (Hsp70)), enhance de novo protein folding by protecting nascent polypeptide chains from misfolding and maintain translational fidelity by involvement in translation termination. Ssb1/2p and RAC chaperones were previously found to inhibit [PSI+] prion generation. We find that most [PSI+] variants arising in the absence of each chaperone were cured by restoring normal levels of that protein. [PSI+] variants hypersensitive to Ssb1/2p have distinguishable biological properties from those hypersensitive to Zuo1p or Ssz1p. The elevated [PSI+] generation frequency in each deletion strain is not due to an altered [PIN+], another prion that primes [PSI+] generation. [PSI+] prion generation/propagation may be inhibited by Ssb1/2/RAC chaperones by ensuring proper folding of nascent Sup35p, thus preventing its joining amyloid fibers. Alternatively, the effect of RAC/Ssb mutations on translation termination and the absence of an effect on the [URE3] prion suggest an effect on the mature Sup35p such that it does not readily join amyloid filaments. Ssz1p is degraded in zuo1 Δ [psi-] cells, but not if the cells carry any of several [PSI+] variants. Our results imply that prions arise more frequently than had been thought but the cell has evolved exquisite antiprion systems that rapidly eliminate most variants., Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interest.

Infectious proteins (prions) include an array of human (mammalian) and yeast amyloid diseases in which a protein or peptide forms a linear β-sheet-rich filament, at least one functional amyloid prion, and two functional infectious proteins unrelated to amyloid. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, at least eight anti-prion systems deal with pathogenic amyloid yeast prions by (1) blocking their generation (Ssb1,2, Ssz1, Zuo1), (2) curing most variants as they arise (Btn2, Cur1, Hsp104, Upf1,2,3, Siw14), and (3) limiting the pathogenicity of variants that do arise and propagate (Sis1, Lug1). Known mechanisms include facilitating proper folding of the prion protein (Ssb1,2, Ssz1, Zuo1), producing highly asymmetric segregation of prion filaments in mitosis (Btn2, Hsp104), competing with the amyloid filaments for prion protein monomers (Upf1,2,3), and regulation of levels of inositol polyphosphates (Siw14). It is hoped that the discovery of yeast anti-prion systems and elucidation of their mechanisms will facilitate finding analogous or homologous systems in humans, whose manipulation may be useful in treatment.

The known amyloid-based prions of Saccharomyces cerevisiae each have multiple heritable forms, called "prion variants" or "prion strains". These variants, all based on the same prion protein sequence, differ in their biological properties and their detailed amyloid structures, although each of the few examined to date have an in-register parallel folded β sheet architecture. Here, we review the range of biological properties of yeast prion variants, factors affecting their generation and propagation, the interaction of prion variants with each other, the mutability of prions, and their segregation during mitotic growth. After early differentiation between strong and weak stable and unstable variants, the parameters distinguishing the variants has dramatically increased, only occasionally correlating with the strong/weak paradigm. A sensitivity to inter- and intraspecies barriers, anti-prion systems, and chaperone deficiencies or excesses and other factors all have dramatic selective effects on prion variants. Recent studies of anti-prion systems, which cure prions in wild strains, have revealed an enormous array of new variants, normally eliminated as they arise and so not previously studied. This work suggests that defects in the anti-prion systems, analogous to immune deficiencies, may be at the root of some human amyloidoses.

Yeast prions have become important models for the study of the basic mechanisms underlying human amyloid diseases. Yeast prions are pathogenic (unlike the [Het-s] prion of Podospora anserina ), and most are amyloid-based with the same in-register parallel β-sheet architecture as most of the disease-causing human amyloids studied. Normal yeast cells eliminate the large majority of prion variants arising, and several anti-prion/anti-amyloid systems that eliminate them have been identified. It is likely that mammalian cells also have anti-amyloid systems, which may be useful in the same way humoral, cellular, and innate immune systems are used to treat or prevent bacterial and viral infections.

I retrace my path from math to medicine to biochemistry to yeast genetics, my focus on infectious diseases of yeast and finally prions. My discovery of yeast prions relied on my particular focus on the logical relations of non-chromosomal genetic elements and the chromosomal genes involved in their propagation and expression. Pursuing an understanding of yeast prions involved structural biology based on genetics, solid-state NMR, population genetics and more genetics.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae is an occasional host to an array of prions, most based on self-propagating, self-templating amyloid filaments of a normally soluble protein. [URE3] is a prion of Ure2p, a regulator of nitrogen catabolism, while [PSI+] is a prion of Sup35p, a subunit of the translation termination factor Sup35p. In contrast to the functional prions, [Het-s] of Podospora anserina and [BETA] of yeast, the amyloid-based yeast prions are rare in wild strains, arise sporadically, have an array of prion variants for a single prion protein sequence, have a folded in-register parallel β-sheet amyloid architecture, are detrimental to their hosts, arouse a stress response in the host, and are subject to curing by various host anti-prion systems. These characteristics allow a logical basis for distinction between functional amyloids/prions and prion diseases. These infectious yeast amyloidoses are outstanding models for the many common human amyloid-based diseases that are increasingly found to have some infectious characteristics., (Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

[URE3] is an amyloid-based prion of Ure2p, a regulator of nitrogen catabolism. While most "variants" of the [URE3] prion are toxic, mild variants that only slightly slow growth are more widely studied. The existence of several antiprion systems suggests that some components may be protecting cells from potential detrimental effects of mild [URE3] variants. Our extensive Hermes transposon mutagenesis showed that disruption of YLR352W dramatically slows the growth of [URE3-1] strains. Ylr352wp is an F-box protein, directing selection of substrates for ubiquitination by a "cullin"-containing E 3 ligase. For efficient ubiquitylation, cullin-dependent E 3 ubiquitin ligases must be NEDDylated, modified by a ubiquitin-related peptide called NEDD8 (Rub1p in yeast). Indeed, we find that disruption of NEDDylation-related genes RUB1 , ULA1 , UBA3 , and UBC12 is also counterselected in our screen. We find that like ylr352w Δ [URE3] strains, ylr352w Δ ure2 Δ strains do not grow on nonfermentable carbon sources. Overexpression of Hap4p, a transcription factor stimulating expression of mitochondrial proteins, or mutation of GLN1 , encoding glutamine synthetase, allows growth of ylr352w ∆ [URE3] strains on glycerol media. Supplying proline as a nitrogen source shuts off the nitrogen catabolite repression (NCR) function of Ure2p, but does not slow growth of ylr352w Δ strains, suggesting a distinct function of Ure2p in carbon catabolism. Also, gln1 mutations impair NCR, but actually relieve the growth defect of ylr352w Δ [URE3] and ylr352w Δ ure2 Δ strains, again showing that loss of NCR is not producing the growth defect and suggesting that Ure2p has another function. YLR352W largely protects cells from the deleterious effects of otherwise mild [URE3] variants or of a ure2 mutation (the latter a rarer event), and we name it LUG1 (lets [URE3]/ ure2 grow)., (Copyright © 2018 by the Genetics Society of America.)

The [PSI+] prion is a folded in-register parallel β-sheet amyloid (filamentous polymer) of Sup35p, a subunit of the translation termination factor. Our searches for anti-prion systems led to our finding that certain soluble inositol polyphosphates (IPs) are important for the propagation of the [PSI+] prion. The IPs affect a wide range of processes, including mRNA export, telomere length, phosphate and polyphosphate metabolism, energy regulation, transcription and translation. We found that 5-diphosphoinositol tetra(or penta)kisphosphate or inositol hexakisphosphate could support [PSI+] prion propagation, and 1-diphosphoinositol pentakisphosphate appears to inhibit the process.

The amyloid-based yeast prions are folded in-register parallel β-sheet polymers. Each prion can exist in a wide array of variants, with different biological properties resulting from different self-propagating amyloid conformations. Yeast has several anti-prion systems, acting in normal cells (without protein overexpression or deficiency). Some anti-prion proteins partially block prion formation (Ssb1,2p, ribosome-associated Hsp70s); others cure a large portion of prion variants that arise [Btn2p, Cur1p, Hsp104 (a disaggregase), Siw14p, and Upf1,2,3p, nonsense-mediated decay proteins], and others prevent prion-induced pathology (Sis1p, essential cytoplasmic Hsp40). Study of the anti-prion activity of Siw14p, a pyrophosphatase specific for 5-diphosphoinositol pentakisphosphate (5PP-IP5), led to the discovery that inositol polyphosphates, signal transduction molecules, are involved in [PSI+] prion propagation. Either inositol hexakisphosphate or 5PP-IP4 (or 5PP-IP5) can supply a function that is needed by nearly all [PSI+] variants. Because yeast prions are informative models for mammalian prion diseases and other amyloidoses, detailed examination of the anti-prion systems, some of which have close mammalian homologues, will be important for the development of therapeutic measures.

The yeast prion [PSI+] is a self-propagating amyloid of Sup35p with a folded in-register parallel β-sheet architecture. In a genetic screen for antiprion genes, using the yeast knockout collection, UPF1/NAM7 and UPF3 , encoding nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) factors, were frequently detected. Almost all [PSI+] variants arising in the absence of Upf proteins were eliminated by restored normal levels of these proteins, and [PSI+] arises more frequently in upf mutants. Upf1p, complexed with Upf2p and Upf3p, is a multifunctional protein with helicase, ATP-binding, and RNA-binding activities promoting efficient translation termination and degradation of mRNAs with premature nonsense codons. We find that the curing ability of Upf proteins is uncorrelated with these previously reported functions but does depend on their interaction with Sup35p and formation of the Upf1p-Upf2p-Upf3p complex (i.e., the Upf complex). Indeed, Sup35p amyloid formation in vitro is inhibited by substoichiometric Upf1p. Inhibition of [PSI+] prion generation and propagation by Upf proteins may be due to the monomeric Upf proteins and the Upf complex competing with Sup35p amyloid fibers for available Sup35p monomers. Alternatively, the association of the Upf complex with amyloid filaments may block the addition of new monomers. Our results suggest that maintenance of normal protein-protein interactions prevents prion formation and can even reverse the process., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

We detail some of the genetic, biochemical, and physical methods useful in studying amyloids in yeast, particularly the yeast prions. These methods include cytoduction (cytoplasmic mixing), infection of cells with prion amyloids, use of green fluorescent protein fusions with amyloid-forming proteins for cytology, protein purification and amyloid formation, and electron microscopy of filaments.

The yeast prions [PSI+] and [URE3] are folded in-register parallel β-sheet amyloids of Sup35p and Ure2p, respectively. In a screen for antiprion systems curing [PSI+] without protein overproduction, we detected Siw14p as an antiprion element. An array of genetic tests confirmed that many variants of [PSI+] arising in the absence of Siw14p are cured by restoring normal levels of the protein. Siw14p is a pyrophosphatase specifically cleaving the β phosphate from 5-diphosphoinositol pentakisphosphate (5PP-IP 5 ), suggesting that increased levels of this or some other inositol polyphosphate favors [PSI+] propagation. In support of this notion, we found that nearly all variants of [PSI+] isolated in a WT strain were lost upon loss of ARG82 , which encodes inositol polyphosphate multikinase. Inactivation of the Arg82p kinase by D131A and K133A mutations (preserving Arg82p's nonkinase transcription regulation functions) resulted the loss of its ability to support [PSI+] propagation. The loss of [PSI+] in arg82 Δ is independent of Hsp104's antiprion activity. [PSI+] variants requiring Arg82p could propagate in ipk1 Δ (IP 5 kinase), kcs1 Δ (IP 6 5-kinase), vip1 Δ (IP 6 1-kinase), ddp1 Δ (inositol pyrophosphatase), or kcs1 Δ vip1 Δ mutants but not in ipk1 Δ kcs1 Δ or ddp1 Δ kcs1 Δ double mutants. Thus, nearly all [PSI+] prion variants require inositol poly-/pyrophosphates for their propagation, and at least IP 6 or 5PP-IP 4 can support [PSI+] propagation., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Overproduction or deficiency of many chaperones and other cellular components cure the yeast prions [ PSI + ] (formed by Sup35p) or [ URE3 ] (based on Ure2p). However, at normal expression levels, Btn2p and Cur1p eliminate most newly arising [ URE3 ] variants but do not cure [ PSI + ], even after overexpression. Deficiency or overproduction of Hsp104 cures the [ PSI + ] prion. Hsp104 deficiency curing is a result of failure to cleave the Sup35p amyloid filaments to make new seeds, whereas Hsp104 overproduction curing occurs by a different mechanism. Hsp104(T160M) can propagate [ PSI + ], but cannot cure it by overproduction, thus separating filament cleavage from curing activities. Here we show that most [ PSI + ] variants arising spontaneously in an hsp104(T160M) strain are cured by restoration of just normal levels of the WT Hsp104. Both strong and weak [ PSI + ] variants are among those cured by this process. This normal-level Hsp104 curing is promoted by Sti1p, Hsp90, and Sis1p, proteins previously implicated in the Hsp104 overproduction curing of [ PSI + ]. The [ PSI + ] prion arises in hsp104(T160M) cells at more than 10-fold the frequency in WT cells. The curing activity of Hsp104 thus constitutes an antiprion system, culling many variants of the [ PSI + ] prion at normal Hsp104 levels., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Infectious proteins (prions) are usually self-templating filamentous protein polymers (amyloids). Yeast prions are genes composed of protein and, like the multiple alleles of DNA-based genes, can have an array of "variants," each a distinct self-propagating amyloid conformation. Like the lethal mammalian prions and amyloid diseases, yeast prions may be lethal, or only mildly detrimental, and show an array of phenotypes depending on the protein involved and the prion variant. Yeast prions are models for both rare mammalian prion diseases and for several very common amyloidoses such as Alzheimer's disease, type 2 diabetes, and Parkinson's disease. Here, we describe their detection and characterization using genetic, cell biological, biochemical, and physical methods.

Transfection of yeast with amyloid filaments, made from recombinant protein or prepared from extracts of cells infected with a prion, has become an important method in characterizing yeast prions. Here, we describe a method for transmission of [URE3] with Ure2p amyloid that is based on a previously published protocol for transfection with Sup35p filaments to make cells [PSI+]. This method may be used for other prions by changing just the amyloid source, host strain, and plating medium.

The recognition that certain long-known nonchromosomal genetic elements were actually prions was based not on the specific phenotypic manifestations of those elements, but rather on their unusual genetic properties. Here, we outline methods of prion assay, methods for showing the nonchromosomal inheritance, and methods for determining whether a nonchromosomal trait has the unusual characteristics diagnostic of a prion. Finally, we discuss genetic methods often useful in the study of yeast prions.

Yeast and fungal prions are infectious proteins, most being self-propagating amyloids of normally soluble proteins. Their effects range from a very mild detriment to lethal, with specific effects dependent on the prion protein and the specific prion variant ("prion strain"). The prion amyloids of Sup35p, Ure2p, and Rnq1p are in-register, parallel, folded β-sheets, an architecture that naturally suggests a mechanism by which a protein can template its conformation, just as DNA or RNA templates its sequence. Prion propagation is critically affected by an array of chaperone systems, most notably the Hsp104/Hsp70/Hsp40 combination, which is responsible for generating new prion seeds from old filaments. The Btn2/Cur1 antiprion system cures most [URE3] prions that develop, and the Ssb antiprion system blocks [PSI+] generation., (Copyright © 2016 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; all rights reserved.)

Prions, infectious proteins, can transmit diseases or be the basis of heritable traits (or both), mostly based on amyloid forms of the prion protein. A single protein sequence can be the basis for many prion strains/variants, with different biological properties based on different amyloid conformations, each rather stably propagating. Prions are unique in that evolution and selection work at both the level of the chromosomal gene encoding the protein, and on the prion itself selecting prion variants. Here, we summarize what is known about the evolution of prion proteins, both the genes and the prions themselves. We contrast the one known functional prion, [Het-s] of Podospora anserina, with the known disease prions, the yeast prions [PSI+] and [URE3] and the transmissible spongiform encephalopathies of mammals.

Yeast prions (infectious proteins) were discovered by their outré genetic properties and have become important models for an array of human prion and amyloid diseases. A single prion protein can become any of many distinct amyloid forms (called prion variants or strains), each of which is self-propagating, but with different biological properties (eg, lethal vs mild). The folded in-register parallel β sheet architecture of the yeast prion amyloids naturally suggests a mechanism by which prion variant information can be faithfully transmitted for many generations. The yeast prions rely on cellular chaperones for their propagation, but can be cured by various chaperone imbalances. The Btn2/Cur1 system normally cures most variants of the [URE3] prion that arise. Although most variants of the [PSI+] and [URE3] prions are toxic or lethal, some are mild in their effects. Even the most mild forms of these prions are rare in the wild, indicating that they too are detrimental to yeast. The beneficial [Het-s] prion of Podospora anserina poses an important contrast in its structure, biology, and evolution to the yeast prions characterized thus far., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

A prion is an infectious protein horizontally transmitting a disease or trait without a required nucleic acid. Yeast and fungal prions are nonchromosomal genes composed of protein, generally an altered form of a protein that catalyzes the same alteration of the protein. Yeast prions are thus transmitted both vertically (as genes composed of protein) and horizontally (as infectious proteins, or prions). Formation of amyloids (linear ordered β-sheet-rich protein aggregates with β-strands perpendicular to the long axis of the filament) underlies most yeast and fungal prions, and a single prion protein can have any of several distinct self-propagating amyloid forms with different biological properties (prion variants). Here we review the mechanism of faithful templating of protein conformation, the biological roles of these prions, and their interactions with cellular chaperones, the Btn2 and Cur1 aggregate-handling systems, and other cellular factors governing prion generation and propagation. Human amyloidoses include the PrP-based prion conditions and many other, more common amyloid-based diseases, several of which show prion-like features. Yeast prions increasingly are serving as models for the understanding and treatment of many mammalian amyloidoses. Patients with different clinical pictures of the same amyloidosis may be the equivalent of yeasts with different prion variants., (Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.)

The [PSI+] prion is a self-propagating amyloid of the translation termination factor, Sup35p, of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The N-terminal 253 residues (NM) of this 685-residue protein normally function in regulating mRNA turnover but spontaneously form infectious amyloid in vitro. We converted the three Ile residues in Sup35NM to Leu and then replaced 16 single residues with Ile, one by one, and prepared Ile-1-(13)C amyloid of each mutant, seeding with amyloid formed by the reference sequence Sup35NM. Using solid-state NMR, we showed that 10 of the residues examined, including six between residues 30 and 90, showed the ∼0.5-nm distance between labels diagnostic of the in-register parallel amyloid architecture. The five scattered N domain residues with wider spacing may be in turns or loops; one is a control at the C terminus of M. All mutants, except Q56I, showed little or no [PSI+] transmission barrier from the reference sequence, suggesting that they could assume a similar amyloid architecture in vitro when seeded with filaments of reference sequence Sup35NM. Infection of yeast cells expressing the reference SUP35 gene sequence with amyloid of several mutants produced [PSI+] transfectants with similar efficiency as did reference sequence Sup35NM amyloid. Our work provides a stringent demonstration that the Sup35 prion domain has the folded in-register parallel β-sheet architecture and suggests common locations of the folds. This architecture naturally suggests a mechanism of inheritance of conformation, the central mystery of prions.

Sup35p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae can form the [PSI+] prion, an infectious amyloid in which the protein is largely inactive. The part of Sup35p that forms the amyloid is the region normally involved in control of mRNA turnover. The formation of [PSI+] by Sup35p's from other yeasts has been interpreted to imply that the prion-forming ability of Sup35p is conserved in evolution, and thus of survival/fitness/evolutionary value to these organisms. We surveyed a larger number of yeast and fungal species by the same criteria as used previously and find that the Sup35p from many species cannot form prions. [PSI+] could be formed by the Sup35p from Candida albicans, Candida maltosa, Debaromyces hansenii, and Kluyveromyces lactis, but orders of magnitude less often than the S. cerevisiae Sup35p converts to the prion form. The Sup35s from Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Ashbya gossypii clearly do not form [PSI+]. We were also unable to detect [PSI+] formation by the Sup35ps from Aspergillus nidulans, Aspergillus fumigatus, Magnaporthe grisea, Ustilago maydis, or Cryptococcus neoformans. Each of two C. albicans SUP35 alleles can form [PSI+], but transmission from one to the other is partially blocked. These results suggest that the prion-forming ability of Sup35p is not a conserved trait, but is an occasional deleterious side effect of a protein domain conserved for another function., (Copyright © 2014 by the Genetics Society of America.)

Structures of the infectious form of prion protein (e.g. PrP(Sc) or PrP-Scrapie) remain poorly defined. The prevalent structural models of PrP(Sc) retain most of the native α-helices of the normal, noninfectious prion protein, cellular prion protein (PrP(C)), but evidence is accumulating that these helices are absent in PrP(Sc) amyloid. Moreover, recombinant PrP(C) can form amyloid fibrils in vitro that have parallel in-register intermolecular β-sheet architectures in the domains originally occupied by helices 2 and 3. Here, we provide solid-state NMR evidence that the latter is also true of initially prion-seeded recombinant PrP amyloids formed in the absence of denaturants. These results, in the context of a primarily β-sheet structure, led us to build detailed models of PrP amyloid based on parallel in-register architectures, fibrillar shapes and dimensions, and other available experimentally derived conformational constraints. Molecular dynamics simulations of PrP(90-231) octameric segments suggested that such linear fibrils, which are consistent with many features of PrP(Sc) fibrils, can have stable parallel in-register β-sheet cores. These simulations revealed that the C-terminal residues ∼124-227 more readily adopt stable tightly packed structures than the N-terminal residues ∼90-123 in the absence of cofactors. Variations in the placement of turns and loops that link the β-sheets could give rise to distinct prion strains capable of faithful template-driven propagation. Moreover, our modeling suggests that single PrP monomers can comprise the entire cross-section of fibrils that have previously been assumed to be pairs of laterally associated protofilaments. Together, these insights provide a new basis for deciphering mammalian prion structures., (© 2014 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.)

[URE3] is an amyloid prion of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ure2p, a regulator of nitrogen catabolism. Overproduction of Btn2p, involved in late endosome to Golgi protein transport, or its paralog Cur1p, cures [URE3]. Btn2p, in curing, is colocalized with Ure2p in a single locus, suggesting sequestration of Ure2p amyloid filaments. We find that most [URE3] variants generated in a btn2 cur1 double mutant are cured by restoring normal levels of Btn2p and Cur1p, with both proteins needed for efficient curing. The [URE3] variants cured by normal levels of Btn2p and Cur1p all have low seed number, again suggesting a seed sequestration mechanism. Hsp42 overproduction also cures [URE3], and Hsp42p aids Btn2 overproduction curing. Cur1p is needed for Hsp42 overproduction curing of [URE3], but neither Btn2p nor Cur1p is needed for overproduction curing by the other. Although hsp42Δ strains stably propagate [URE3-1], hsp26Δ destabilizes this prion. Thus, Btn2p and Cur1p are antiprion system components at their normal levels, acting with Hsp42. Btn2p is related in sequence to human Hook proteins, involved in aggresome formation and other transport activities.

Prions (infectious proteins) cause fatal neurodegenerative diseases in mammals. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, many toxic and lethal variants of the [PSI+] and [URE3] prions have been identified in laboratory strains, although some commonly studied variants do not seem to impair cell growth. Phylogenetic analysis has revealed four major clades of S. cerevisiae that share histories of two prion proteins and largely correspond to different ecological niches of yeast. The [PIN+] prion was most prevalent in commercialized niches, infrequent among wine/vineyard strains, and not observed in ancestral isolates. As previously reported, the [PSI+] and [URE3] prions are not found in any of these strains. Patterns of heterozygosity revealed genetic mosaicism and indicated extensive outcrossing among divergent strains in commercialized environments. In contrast, ancestral isolates were all homozygous and wine/vineyard strains were closely related to each other and largely homozygous. Cellular growth patterns were highly variable within and among clades, although ancestral isolates were the most efficient sporulators and domesticated strains showed greater tendencies for flocculation. [PIN+]-infected strains had a significantly higher likelihood of polyploidy, showed a higher propensity for flocculation compared to uninfected strains, and had higher sporulation efficiencies compared to domesticated, uninfected strains. Extensive phenotypic variability among strains from different environments suggests that S. cerevisiae is a niche generalist and that most wild strains are able to switch from asexual to sexual and from unicellular to multicellular growth in response to environmental conditions. Our data suggest that outbreeding and multicellular growth patterns adapted for domesticated environments are ecological risk factors for the [PIN+] prion in wild yeast., (Copyright © 2014 by the Genetics Society of America.)

The unusual genetic properties of the non-chromosomal genetic elements [URE3] and [PSI+] led to them being identified as prions (infectious proteins) of Ure2p and Sup35p respectively. Ure2p and Sup35p, and now several other proteins, can form amyloid, a linear ordered polymer of protein monomers, with a part of each molecule, the prion domain, forming the core of this β-sheet structure. Amyloid filaments passed to a new cell seed the conversion of the normal form of the protein into the same amyloid form. The cell's phenotype is affected, usually from the deficiency of the normal form of the protein. Solid-state NMR studies indicate that the yeast prion amyloids are in-register parallel β-sheet structures, in which each residue (e.g. Asn35) forms a row along the filament long axis. The favourable interactions possible for aligned identical hydrophilic and hydrophobic residues are believed to be the mechanism for propagation of amyloid conformation. Thus, just as DNA mediates inheritance by templating its own sequence, these proteins act as genes by templating their conformation. Distinct isolates of a given prion have different biological properties, presumably determined by differences between the amyloid structures. Many lines of evidence indicate that the Saccharomyces cerevisiae prions are pathological disease agents, although the example of the [Het-s] prion of Podospora anserina shows that a prion can have beneficial aspects.

Many peptides and proteins self-assemble into amyloid fibrils. Examples include mammalian and fungal prion proteins, polypeptides associated with human amyloid diseases, and proteins that may have biologically functional amyloid states. To understand the propensity for polypeptides to form amyloid fibrils and to facilitate rational design of amyloid inhibitors and imaging agents, it is necessary to elucidate the molecular structures of these fibrils. Although fibril structures were largely mysterious 15 years ago, a considerable body of reliable structural information about amyloid fibril structures now exists, with essential contributions from solid state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements. This Account reviews results from our laboratories and discusses several structural issues that have been controversial. In many cases, the amino acid sequences of amyloid fibrils do not uniquely determine their molecular structures. Self-propagating, molecular-level polymorphism complicates the structure determination problem and can lead to apparent disagreements between results from different laboratories, particularly when different laboratories study different polymorphs. For 40-residue β-amyloid (Aβ₁₋₄₀) fibrils associated with Alzheimer's disease, we have developed detailed structural models from solid state NMR and electron microscopy data for two polymorphs. These polymorphs have similar peptide conformations, identical in-register parallel β-sheet organizations, but different overall symmetry. Other polymorphs have also been partially characterized by solid state NMR and appear to have similar structures. In contrast, cryo-electron microscopy studies that use significantly different fibril growth conditions have identified structures that appear (at low resolution) to be different from those examined by solid state NMR. Based on solid state NMR and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements, the in-register parallel β-sheet organization found in β-amyloid fibrils also occurs in many other fibril-forming systems. We attribute this common structural motif to the stabilization of amyloid structures by intermolecular interactions among like amino acids, including hydrophobic interactions and polar zippers. Surprisingly, we have recently identified and characterized antiparallel β-sheets in certain fibrils that are formed by the D23N mutant of Aβ₁₋₄₀, a mutant that is associated with early-onset, familial neurodegenerative disease. Antiparallel D23N-Aβ₁₋₄₀ fibrils are metastable with respect to parallel structures and, therefore, represent an off-pathway intermediate in the amyloid fibril formation process. Other methods have recently produced additional evidence for antiparallel β-sheets in other amyloid-formation intermediates. As an alternative to simple parallel and antiparallel β-sheet structures, researchers have proposed β-helical structural models for some fibrils, especially those formed by mammalian and fungal prion proteins. Solid state NMR and EPR data show that fibrils formed in vitro by recombinant PrP have in-register parallel β-sheet structures. However, the structure of infectious PrP aggregates is not yet known. The fungal HET-s prion protein has been shown to contain a β-helical structure. However, all yeast prions studied by solid state NMR (Sup35p, Ure2p, and Rnq1p) have in-register parallel β-sheet structures, with their Gln- and Asn-rich N-terminal segments forming the fibril core.

Yeast prions are infectious proteins that spread exclusively by mating. The frequency of prions in the wild therefore largely reflects the rate of spread by mating counterbalanced by prion growth slowing effects in the host. We recently showed that the frequency of outcross mating is about 1% of mitotic doublings with 23-46% of total matings being outcrosses. These findings imply that even the mildest forms of the [PSI+], [URE3] and [PIN+] prions impart > 1% growth/survival detriment on their hosts. Our estimate of outcrossing suggests that Saccharomyces cerevisiae is far more sexual than previously thought and would therefore be more responsive to the adaptive effects of natural selection compared with a strictly asexual yeast. Further, given its large effective population size, a growth/survival detriment of > 1% for yeast prions should strongly select against prion-infected strains in wild populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Ure2p, normally a regulator of nitrogen catabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, can be a prion (infectious protein) by forming a folded in-register parallel amyloid called [URE3]. Using S. cerevisiae as a test bed, we previously showed that Ure2p of Candida albicans (CaUre2p) can also form a prion, but that Ure2p of C. glabrata (CgUre2p) cannot. Here, we constructed C. glabrata strains to test whether CgUre2p can form a prion in its native environment. We find that while CaUre2p can form a [URE3] in C. glabrata, CgUre2p cannot, although the latter has a prion domain sequence more similar to that of ScUre2p than that of CaUre2p. This supports the notion that prion formation is not a conserved property of Ure2p but is a pathology arising sporadically. We find that some [URE3albicans] variants are restricted in their transmissibility to certain recipient strains. In addition, we show that the C. glabrata HO can induce switching of the C. glabrata mating type locus.

The prions (infectious proteins) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are proteins acting as genes, by templating their conformation from one molecule to another in analogy to DNA templating its sequence. Most yeast prions are amyloid forms of normally soluble proteins, and a single protein sequence can have any of several self-propagating forms (called prion strains or variants), analogous to the different possible alleles of a DNA gene. A central issue in prion biology is the structural basis of this conformational templating process. The in-register parallel β sheet structure found for several infectious yeast prion amyloids naturally suggests an explanation for this conformational templating. While most prions are plainly diseases, the [Het-s] prion of Podospora anserina may be a functional amyloid, with important structural implications. Yeast prions are important models for human amyloid diseases in general, particularly because new evidence is showing infectious aspects of several human amyloidoses not previously classified as prions. We also review studies of the roles of chaperones, aggregate-collecting proteins, and other cellular components using yeast that have led the way in improving the understanding of similar processes that must be operating in many human amyloidoses.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been a key experimental organism for the study of infectious diseases, including dsRNA viruses, ssRNA viruses, and prions. Studies of the mechanisms of virus and prion replication, virus structure, and structure of the amyloid filaments that are the basis of yeast prions have been at the forefront of such studies in these classes of infectious entities. Yeast has been particularly useful in defining the interactions of the infectious elements with cellular components: chromosomally encoded proteins necessary for blocking the propagation of the viruses and prions, and proteins involved in the expression of viral components. Here, we emphasize the L-A dsRNA virus and its killer-toxin-encoding satellites, the 20S and 23S ssRNA naked viruses, and the several infectious proteins (prions) of yeast., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

[PSI(+)] is an amyloid-based prion of Sup35p, a subunit of the translation termination factor. Prion "strains" or "variants" are amyloids with different conformations of a single protein sequence, conferring different phenotypes, but each relatively faithfully propagated. Wild Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates have SUP35 alleles that fall into three groups, called reference, Δ19, and E9, with limited transmissibility of [PSI(+)] between cells expressing these different polymorphs. Here we show that prion transmission pattern between different Sup35 polymorphs is prion variant-dependent. Passage of one prion variant from one Sup35 polymorph to another need not change the prion variant. Surprisingly, simple mitotic growth of a [PSI(+)] strain results in a spectrum of variant transmission properties among the progeny clones. Even cells that have grown for >150 generations continue to vary in transmission properties, suggesting that simple variant segregation is insufficient to explain the results. Rather, there appears to be continuous generation of a cloud of prion variants, with one or another becoming stochastically dominant, only to be succeeded by a different mixture. We find that among the rare wild isolates containing [PSI(+)], all indistinguishably "weak" [PSI(+)], are several different variants based on their transmission efficiencies to other Sup35 alleles. Most show some limitation of transmission, indicating that the evolved wild Sup35 alleles are effective in limiting the spread of [PSI(+)]. Notably, a "strong [PSI(+)]" can have any of several different transmission efficiency patterns, showing that "strong" versus "weak" is insufficient to indicate prion variant uniformity., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Even deadly prions may be widespread in nature if they spread by infection faster than they kill off their hosts. The yeast prions [PSI+] and [URE3] (amyloids of Sup35p and Ure2p) were not found in 70 wild strains, while [PIN+] (amyloid of Rnq1p) was found in ∼16% of the same population. Yeast prion infection occurs only by mating, balancing the detrimental effects of carrying the prion. We estimated the frequency of outcross mating as about 1% of mitotic doublings from the known detriment of carrying the 2-μm DNA plasmid (∼1%) and its frequency in wild populations (38/70). We also estimated the fraction of total matings that are outcross matings (∼23-46%) from the fraction of heterozygosity at the highly polymorphic RNQ1 locus (∼46%). These results show that the detriment of carrying even the mildest forms of [PSI+], [URE3], or [PIN+] is greater than 1%. We find that Rnq1p polymorphisms in wild strains include several premature stop codon alleles that cannot propagate [PIN+] from the reference allele and others with several small deletions and point mutations which show a small transmission barrier. Wild strains carrying [PIN+] are far more likely to be heterozygous at RNQ1 and other loci than are [pin-] strains, probably reflecting its being a sexually transmitted disease. Because sequence differences are known to block prion propagation or ameliorate its pathogenic effects, we hypothesize that polymorphism of RNQ1 was selected to protect cells from detrimental effects of the [PIN+] prion.

[PSI+] is a prion of Sup35p, an essential translation termination and mRNA turnover factor. The existence of lethal [PSI+] variants, the absence of [PSI+] in wild strains, the mRNA turnover function of the Sup35p prion domain, and the stress reaction to prion infection suggest that [PSI+] is a disease. Nonetheless, others have proposed that [PSI+] and other yeast prions benefit their hosts. We find that wild Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains are polymorphic for the sequence of the prion domain and particularly in the adjacent M domain. Here we establish that these variations within the species produce barriers to prion transmission. The barriers are partially asymmetric in some cases, and evidence for variant specificity in barriers is presented. We propose that, as the PrP 129M/V polymorphism protects people from Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, the Sup35p polymorphisms were selected to protect yeast cells from prion infection. In one prion incompatibility group, the barrier is due to N109S in the Sup35 prion domain and several changes in the middle (M) domain, with either the single N109S mutation or the group of M changes (without the N109S) producing a barrier. In another, the barrier is due to a large deletion in the repeat domain. All are outside the region previously believed to determine transmission compatibility. [SWI+], a prion of the chromatin remodeling factor Swi1p, was also proposed to benefit its host. We find that none of 70 wild strains carry this prion, suggesting that it is not beneficial.

We detail some of the genetic, biochemical, and physical methods useful in studying amyloids in yeast, particularly the yeast prions. These methods include cytoduction (cytoplasmic mixing), infection of cells with prion amyloids, use of green fluorescent protein fusions with amyloid-forming proteins for cytology, protein purification and amyloid formation, and electron microscopy of filaments.

Transthyretin (TTR) is a largely β-sheet serum protein responsible for transporting thyroxine and vitamin A. TTR is found in amyloid deposits of patients with senile systemic amyloidosis. TTR mutants lead to familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy and familial amyloid cardiomyopathy, with an earlier age of onset. Studies of amyloid fibrils of familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy mutant TTR suggest a structure similar to the native state with only a simple opening of a β-strand-loop-strand region exposing the two main β-sheets of the protein for fibril elongation. However, we find that the wild-type TTR sequence forms amyloid fibrils that are considerably different from the previously suggested amyloid structure. Using protease digestion with mass spectrometry, we observe the amyloid core to be primarily composed of the C-terminal region, starting around residue 50. Solid-state NMR measurements prove that TTR differs from other pathological amyloids in not having an in-register parallel β-sheet architecture. We also find that the TTR amyloid is incapable of binding thyroxine as monitored by either isothermal calorimetry or 1,8-anilinonaphthalene sulfonate competition. Taken together, our experiments are consistent with a significantly different configuration of the β-sheets compared to the previously suggested structure., (Copyright © 2011 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Although amyloid fibrils are generally considered to be causative or contributing agents in amyloid diseases, several amyloid fibrils are also believed to have biological functions. Among these are fibrils formed by Pmel17 within melanosomes, which act as a template for melanin deposition. We use solid-state NMR to show that the molecular structures of fibrils formed by the 130-residue pseudo-repeat domain Pmel17:RPT are polymorphic even within the biologically relevant pH range. Thus, biological function in amyloid fibrils does not necessarily imply a unique molecular structure. Solid-state NMR spectra of three Pmel17:RPT polymorphs show that in all cases, only a subset (~30%) of the full amino acid sequence contributes to the immobilized fibril core. Although the repetitive nature of the sequence and incomplete spectral resolution prevent the determination of unique chemical shift assignments from two- and three-dimensional solid-state NMR spectra, we use a Monte Carlo assignment algorithm to identify protein segments that are present in or absent from the fibril core. The results show that the identity of the core-forming segments varies from one polymorph to another, a phenomenon known as segmental polymorphism., (Copyright © 2011 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)