Search

Objective: Endovascular repair of the ascending aorta is currently limited to patients at high surgical risk with aortic diseases originating above the sinotubular junction. A number of different endovascular technologies and approaches have been used, although no consensus exists regarding a standardized technique. To better understand real-world endovascular approaches to the ascending aorta, we performed a comprehensive review of the types of endovascular aortic stents and associated vascular access used in repair of the ascending aorta., Methods: A search of the MEDLINE database was conducted from January 1, 1995, through January 31, 2017, with the search term "ascending aortic stent." Studies involving endovascular stenting in which the primary therapy was confined exclusively to the ascending aorta were included. Studies involving hybrid arch procedures and surgical replacement of the ascending aorta associated with aortic stenting were excluded. The type of aortic stent, underlying aortic disease, and surgical approach were recorded along with outcomes, need for reinterventions, and follow-up., Results: A total of 46 publications that focused on primary endovascular repair of the ascending aorta were identified. Thirteen different aortic stent grafts of various designs were used in 118 total patients. The most commonly used device types were thoracic stents (n = 84 [71.2%]) along with abdominal cuffs (n = 13 [11%]) and custom-made grafts (n = 12 [10.2%]). The most commonly treated aortic disease was type A aortic dissection (n = 59 [50%]), followed by aortic pseudoaneurysm (n = 35 [29.7%]), aortic aneurysm (n = 6 [5.1%]), penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (n = 5 [4.2%]), and acute aortic rupture (n = 3 [2.5%]). Femoral arterial access was used in 62.7% of patients (n = 74); transapical (n = 17 [14.4%]), carotid (n = 15 [12.7%]), and axillary (n = 8 [6.8%]) approaches were also used. The overall type I endoleak rate was 18.6% (n = 22), with 11 patients (9.3%) requiring reintervention. Other complications included all-cause mortality (n = 18 [15.2%]), conversions to open surgery (n = 4 [3.4%]), and cerebrovascular complications (n = 4 [3.4%]). Aorta-related mortality was 5% (n = 6), and average follow-up was 17.2 months., Conclusions: Despite the absence of a dedicated aortic stent graft for the ascending aorta, patients with a range of ascending aortic diseases are being successfully treated by endovascular technologies. For optimal outcomes, patient selection is critical to align aortic anatomy with the limited device sizing options, and it should be reserved for patients at high surgical risk., (Copyright © 2017 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Involvement of qualified specialists with proficiency in endovascular therapies has created flux regarding the role of cardiothoracic surgeons, vascular surgeons, and other catheter-skilled specialists in the management of type B aortic dissections. We used manuscript authorship trends and recent match data in order to study how multi-specialty involvement in treating aortic dissections has changed in the endovascular era., Methods: A PubMed review of published literature between 1998 and 2015 was performed with "aortic dissection" in the title. Case studies and entries with incomplete author or identifying information were excluded. Author number, specialty affiliation, and treatment focus were recorded. Available residency match data were obtained from the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP)., Results: Cardiothoracic surgeons represented 38.5% (10/23) of the authors for papers with an endovascular focus in 1998 compared with 27.7% (59/213) in 2015. Vascular surgeons represented 19.2% (5/23) and 37.1% (79/213) of authors in 1998 and 2015, respectively. Radiologists accounted for 30.4% (7/23) of authorship in 1998 and 8.9% (19/213) in 2015. NRMP match data revealed a 10.6% decrease in thoracic surgery matches from 2004 to 2015, while vascular surgery and interventional radiology increased by 74.7% and 191.1%, respectively., Conclusions: Endovascular technologies have resulted in significant changes as to which specialties manage complicated type B aortic dissections. Vascular surgeons, with both open and extensive endovascular training are optimally positioned to assume a major role in the care of aortic dissection patients. Continued emphasis on endovascular training and multispecialty collaboration is essential for cardiothoracic surgeons in the endovascular era., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

We present the case of a 48-year-old woman with an acute type A aortic dissection that was treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair at our institution. The patient was found to have a focal type A dissection with pericardial effusion but no tamponade physiology and no involvement of the aortic valve or root. We elected to treat the patient's type A aortic dissection with an endovascular stent because of the patient's favorable anatomy and no evidence of neurologic deficits or signs of distal malperfusion. The patient was successfully treated with an abdominal aortic cuff deployed through the axillary artery. An axillary approach was necessary because of the short length of the delivery sheath preventing a transfemoral delivery. At 2-year follow-up, the patient remains free of complications with computed tomography scan revealing complete false lumen thrombosis and a stable endovascular repair. This report demonstrates a case of acute type A aortic dissection successfully treated using thoracic endovascular aortic repair and illustrates the utility of axillary cannulation for precise deployment of stent grafts in the ascending aorta.

Objective: Aortic occlusion with an endoballoon is a well-established technique to facilitate robotic and minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. Use of the endoballoon has several relative contraindications including ascending aortic dilatation greater than 38 mm in size. We sought to review our experience using the endoballoon in cases of totally endoscopic mitral valve surgery with aortic diameters greater than 38 mm., Methods: A retrospective review of our single-site database was conducted to identify patients undergoing totally endoscopic mitral valve surgery by a single surgeon using an endoballoon and who had ascending aortic dilation. We defined aortic dilation as greater than 38 mm. Computed tomography was done preoperatively on all patients to evaluate the aortic anatomy as well as iliofemoral access vessels. Femoral artery cannulation was done in a standardized fashion to advance and position the endoballoon, to occlude the ascending aorta, and to deliver cardioplegia., Results: From October 2011 through June 2015, 196 patients underwent totally endoscopic mitral valve surgery using an endoballoon at our institution. Twenty-two patients (11.2%) had ascending aortic diameters greater than 38 mm (range, 38.1-46.6 mm; mean, 40.5 ± 2.5 mm). In these cases, there were no instances of aortic dissection or other injury due to balloon rupture, balloon migration, device movement leading to loss of occlusion, or inability to complete planned surgery due to occlusion failure., Conclusions: Our experience suggests that it is possible to successfully use endoaortic balloon occlusion in patients with ascending aortic dilation with proper preoperative imaging and planning.

As more challenging aortic arch anatomy is being treated using aortic stent-grafts, there is an increased risk for proximal Type I endoleaks at the proximal seal zone or subsequent graft migration. We report a case of an endoanchor-assisted thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair of a patient with an aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) and aortic arch aneurysm who developed a proximal Type I endoleak in the aortic arch which was subsequently treated with endoanchors., (© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

We aimed to develop a method that provides an alternative cannulation site in robotic mitral valve surgery that allows simultaneous endo-occlusion and antegrade perfusion. A 71-year-old man with severe mitral regurgitation and history of coronary artery bypass grafting underwent totally endoscopic robotic mitral valve repair. A 23-mm endoreturn cannula was placed through a 10-mm graft that was sewn to the left axillary artery. An endoballoon was passed through the Dacron/cannula complex and into the ascending aorta. This complex was used for simultaneous antegrade perfusion, endoballoon occlusion, and antegrade cardioplegia. Completion transesophageal echocardiography showed no evidence of mitral regurgitation. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was doing well at his 2-month follow-up appointment. The left axillary artery is a viable option for simultaneous endoballoon occlusion, antegrade perfusion, and antegrade cardioplegia in robotic mitral valve surgery. This has the potential benefit of providing antegrade perfusion, which some studies have shown to be associated with a decreased risk of complications when compared with retrograde perfusion specifically in patients with severe peripheral vascular disease.

Purpose: To describe a bailout technique for in situ fenestration of an inadvertently covered internal iliac artery (IIA) associated with endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA)., Technique: The procedure is demonstrated in a 76-year-old patient who underwent elective repair of a 5-cm infrarenal AAA using an Excluder endovascular graft 2 years following thoracic aortic stent-graft repair of a chronic type B aortic dissection. A completion angiogram demonstrated unintentional coverage of the left IIA. The iliac limb of the stent-graft was not able to be displaced away from the ostium, so to preserve IIA perfusion in a patient with prior thoracic aortic stent-grafting, a bailout technique was performed using an Outback re-entry device to successfully fenestrate the polytetrafluoroethylene graft material. An iCast balloon-expandable stent was placed across the fenestration creating a patent side branch to maintain patency. Six-year follow-up demonstrates a stable repair., Conclusion: In situ fenestration of a stent-graft overlying the internal iliac artery can be a useful bailout technique when other options are unsuccessful.

Objective: Primary adult aortic coarctation (PAAC) is an unusual cause of hypertension. The standard of care includes surgical repair, which can be associated with considerable morbidity and operative risk. Although balloon angioplasty has been successfully used in paediatric and adolescent patients with coarctation, little information exists regarding the endovascular repair of PAAC. This study examines the procedural safety and efficacy of endovascular repair of PAAC along with midterm outcomes., Methods: Between January 2000 and July 2008, 16 patients underwent endovascular repair of PAAC. All patients were hypertensive with 13 patients (81.3%) receiving medical therapy. Symptoms included chest pain (n=11, 69%), progressive fatigue (n=5, 31%), exercise intolerance (n=4, 25%) and shortness of breath (n=3, 19%). Associated cardiac concerns included depressed ejection fraction (n=6, 38%), pulmonary hypertension (n=5, 31%), ascending aortic dilatation (n=5, 31%) and bicuspid aortic valve (n=4, 25%). Endovascular repair was achieved using a percutaneous femoral approach. Balloon angioplasty of the coarctation was performed prior to treatment using a balloon-expandable uncovered stent. Aortic diameters were assessed using intravascular ultrasound. Pre- and post-procedure pressure gradients were measured and success was determined as a residual pressure gradient across the treated aorta of less than 20 mmHg., Results: The male:female (M:F) ratio was 9:7 with a mean age of 39.7 years. Procedural success was 100%. Mean pre-procedural aortic diameter was 8.4mm (3-14 mm) and mean post-procedural aortic diameter was 16.3mm (10-20mm) (p=0.04). The mean pre-procedural pressure gradient was 48.3 mmHg (25-100 mmHg) and the mean post-procedural pressure gradient was 0.5 mmHg (0-15 mmHg) (p=0.05). Twelve patients received one stent, two patients received two stents, one patient received three stents and one other patient received a thoracic stent graft. The rate of paraplegia was 0% with no blood transfusions, strokes or deaths. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 72 months (mean=22.8 months). One patient required re-intervention with an additional stent 14 months following the initial procedure and all the patients remain symptom-free., Conclusion: Endovascular repair of PAAC is safe and effective and compares favourably with open surgical repair. Midterm follow-up suggests that the treatment is durable and may be an alternative to surgical repair. Although this is the largest endovascular treatment series for PAAC reported to date, additional study and follow-up are needed., (Copyright 2010 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Questions have risen regarding procedural indications, techniques, and outcomes for hybrid arch procedures. We performed a meta-analysis to benchmark this innovative approach. Studies and case reports involving hybrid aortic arch procedures listed through May 2008 were reviewed (n = 718). End points were 30-day mortality, stroke, paraplegia, and endoleak rates. A total of 15 studies with 463 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall 30-day mortality was 8.3%. Endoleak rate was 9.2%, stroke was 4.4%, and paraplegia was 3.9%. Treated on-pump or off-pump did not affect any of the endpoints. Results compare favorably with standard operative repair. Long-term follow-up is needed., (Copyright 2010 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Endografting, like open surgical repair of the thoracic aorta, can be complicated by paraplegia. We reviewed our thoracic endografting experience regarding the incidence and treatment of spinal cord neurologic events. Between February 2000 and July 2008, 346 patients underwent endoluminal grafting of the descending thoracic aorta. Indications for intervention included atherosclerotic aneurysms (45.9%), acute and chronic dissections (31.5%), miscellaneous lesions (13.6%), and penetrating aortic ulcers (8.9%). Ten women and 4 men (4.0%), with a mean age of 71.3 years, developed either paraparesis (1.7%) or paraplegia (2.3%). Nine (64.3%) of these patients had an aneurysm, 4 (28.6%) had acute or chronic type B aortic dissection, and 1 (7.1%) had a penetrating aortic ulcer; 3 (21.4%) of them had previously undergone open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, and 13 (92.9%) required coverage of more than 20 cm of the aorta. Cerebrospinal fluid drainage was instituted in 7/8 paraplegic patients. Eight (57.1%) of the 14 patients recovered fully, 2 (14.3%) experienced partial recovery, and 4 (28.6%) had significant neurological deficits. Paraplegia following thoracic endografting appears to be associated with female sex, long-segment coverage of the thoracic aorta, and aneurysmal disease.

Symptomatic patients with penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers of the descending thoracic aorta have traditionally been treated by using an open surgical repair. The emergence of thoracic aortic stent-graft technologies has introduced a less invasive treatment option, which often involves covering excess portions of a normal aorta with stent-graft material. We describe the mid-term follow-up of a patient with a symptomatic penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer of the descending thoracic aorta treated with an Amplatzer septal occluder device (AGA Medical Corp, Plymouth, MN), which is typically used for structural heart disease.

Objective: Increasing experience with thoracic aortic stent grafts has led to a more aggressive approach to thoracic aortic pathologies in the distal aortic arch and proximal descending thoracic aorta. To increase the length of the proximal landing zone, it is sometimes necessary to cover the left subclavian artery with the thoracic stent-graft, introducing the risk of retrograde filling of the excluded aorta from the left subclavian artery. It is currently unclear how best to manage these patients to prevent persistent risk of aneurysm expansion or rupture. We report our experience with a minimally invasive endovascular repair of the covered left subclavian artery., Methods: We reviewed prospectively gathered data on all investigational device exemption-approved patients undergoing thoracic aortic stent grafting at the Arizona Heart Institute from 2000 to 2006 (n = 289 patients). Patients had surveillance with a contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan on the first postoperative day and during follow-up at 1, 6, and 12 months., Results: A total of 289 patients received thoracic stent grafts during the study: Medtronic Talent (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minn) (n = 25) or Gore TAG (WL Gore & Associates Inc, Flagstaff, Ariz) (n = 261). The left subclavian artery was covered in 23% of patients (n = 66), of whom 17% had preoperative carotid-subclavian bypass (n = 11/66). Among patients with left subclavian artery coverage, the 30-day mortality was 6.1% (n = 4), procedure-related strokes developed in 3 patients (n = 3, 4.6%), and the incidence of left arm claudication was 7.6% (n = 5), necessitating postoperative carotid-subclavian bypass in 2 patients. Twelve patients (18%) had a type I (n = 6) or II (n = 7) endoleak. Coverage of the left subclavian artery accounted for 71% of the type II endoleaks (n = 5), whereas patent intercostals accounted for the rest (n = 2). Type II endoleaks associated with left subclavian artery coverage were successfully treated by retrograde coil embolization from the left brachial artery (n = 3) or left subclavian artery ligation (n = 1)., Conclusion: Coverage of the left subclavian artery during thoracic aortic stent grafting is associated with a low incidence of arm complications and type II endoleaks. All type II endoleaks were successfully treated by retrograde coil embolization or ligation of the left subclavian artery. Successful treatment of endoleaks may reduce the risk of aneurysm expansion or rupture.

Traditional open surgical repair for aortic rupture from a thoracoabdominal pseudoaneurysm is associated with a high morbidity and mortality. The use of advanced intravascular imaging and endovascular techniques permits selection and customizing endoluminal graft components to treat such catastrophic events in high-risk surgical patients. We report the successful management of a ruptured thoracoabdominal pseudoaneurysm with an endovascular approach.

Background: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of thoracic endografting in the octogenarian population., Methods: Between February 2000 and August 2005, 249 patients with a mean age of 69+/-12.3 years (range 23-91) underwent thoracic endografting. Forty-four patients (27 males and 17 females) were octogenarians with a mean age of 84+/-2.7 years. Indications for intervention included: atherosclerotic aneurysms (26/44, 59%), acute and chronic dissections (9/44, 20.5%), penetrating aortic ulcers (6/44, 14%) and contained rupture (3/44, 7%)., Results: Endovascular repair was achieved in all octogenarian patients (44/44, 100%). Mean length of stay was 4.7+/-3.6 days. Two cardiac-related deaths and 1 retrograde dissection death occurred (3/44, 7%). Complications included hemiparesis (n=2) with full recovery at discharge, groin hematoma (n=1), pneumonia (n=2) and stroke (n=1) [6/44, 11%]. Endoleaks were diagnosed in 3 patients [3/44, 7%] (2 type I, 1 type II) at 30-day follow-up. Two patients developed an endoleak beyond 30 days [2/44, 5%] (1 type I, 1 type II). Two re-interventions were necessary at 30 days (1 type I, 1 type II). Mean follow-up was 22 months and there were no device migrations or aortic ruptures. No statistical differences in overall mortality were noted between octogenarians and non-octogenarians at 30 days (7% vs 6%, p=NS), 12 months (18% vs 13%, p=NS) and 24 months (27% vs 15%, p=NS). However, at 5 years post-procedure, octogenarians had a significantly higher overall mortality than non-octogenarians (32% vs 17%, p=0.038)., Conclusions: Advanced age is not a contraindication to thoracic endografting with favorable short and mid-term outcomes compared to non-octogenarians.

Objective: Endoluminal grafting is emerging as a less invasive alternative to the treatment of descending thoracic aorta diseases. Endoleaks (continued pressurization of the treated aorta external to the endoluminal graft) are a potential complication. We reviewed our cumulative endovascular experience for descending thoracic aorta pathologies with respect to the management of endoleaks and associated patient outcomes., Methods: As part of a single-site investigational device-exemption protocol, 249 patients (146 men, 103 women) with thoracic aortic diseases underwent attempted delivery of a TAG endoprosthesis (W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) between February 2000 and August 2005. Indications for study enrollment included 111 atherosclerotic aneurysms (44.6%), 67 aortic dissections (26.9%), 27 penetrating aortic ulcers (10.8%), 14 contained ruptures (5.6%), 11 pseudoaneurysms (4.4%), 9 acute aortic transections (3.6%), 7 aortobronchial fistulas (2.8%), 2 endoleaks (0.8%) after prior thoracic endoluminal grafting, and 1 (0.4%) adult coarctation. Endoleak surveillance was performed using serial computed tomography scans., Results: Mean patient age was 68 years (range, 23-91 years). Endoleak developed in 38 patients (15.3%): 15 distal type I (39.5%), 13 proximal type I (34.2%), 8 type II (21.1%) and 2 type III (5.3%). No surgical intervention was performed in 26 patients (68.4%), in which the endoleak spontaneously resolved in 14 (53.8%), 8 (30.8%) are being monitored and are asymptomatic, 3 (11.5%) died of unrelated causes, 2 (7.7%) withdrew from the study, and 1 (3.8%) was lost to follow-up. Twelve patients (31.6%) required reintervention using an additional endoluminal graft: 8 (66.7%) with a proximal type I endoleak, 2 (16.7%) with a distal type I endoleak, 1 (8.3%) with both distal type I and type III endoleaks, and 1 (8.3%) with a type III endoleak. Open conversions were necessary secondary to device deployment difficulties in two patients (0.8%), and due to expansion of a thoracoabdominal aneurysm and rupture of an aneurysm secondary to a type II endoleak in one patient (0.5%) each., Conclusion: Endoleaks are an infrequent, yet important, complication after thoracic endografting. Many endoleaks will resolve spontaneously, but some patients may require another endovascular intervention. Close surveillance is recommended for these patients; however, open conversion is rarely indicated. Because more diseases of the thoracic aorta are being treated using an endovascular approach, a standardized treatment algorithm is essential to safely and effectively manage associated endoleaks.

Objective: Retrograde type A dissection during or after endoluminal graft repair of the descending thoracic aorta is a potentially lethal complication unique to thoracic endografting. Our aim is to increase its awareness and to review possible etiological factors., Methods: Two hundred and eighty-seven patients with different thoracic aortic pathologies were treated with endovascular prostheses over the last 6 years (February 2000 to March 2006) under a single-site protocol. A retrospective review was conducted to identify any retrograde aortic dissections by both chart and film review. Factors that may have contributed to its formation were also documented. This population was analyzed for the complication of retrograde aortic dissection as well as the factors related to its occurrence., Results: Seven patients (2.4%) with a gender distribution of three males and four females experienced a retrograde type A dissection within this sample at a median of 202 days. The mean age was 74 years (range 53-83). Aortic pathologies included aortic dissections (n=6) and thoracic aortic aneurysm (n=1). There were (n=3) 43% retrograde type A dissections identified within the perioperative period. Balloon angioplasty was performed in 71.4% (n=5). Two female patients (28.6%) had this event identified within their initial hospitalization with fatal consequences. Overall mortality was 57% (n=4) with extension of dissection the primary cause of death n=3 and open surgical repair (n=1) after an extension of retrograde dissection., Conclusions: Female gender, use of stent-grafts for dissection and possible aggressive balloon angioplasty may play a role in the cause of retrograde type A dissection. A close surveillance program is recommended when using thoracic endografts outside the recommended device instructions for use.

Objective: : Routine preoperative carotid-subclavian bypass or transposition is frequently recommended in patients undergoing endovascular repair of the descending thoracic aorta (DTA). We reviewed our comprehensive thoracic endografting experience with regards to coverage of the left subclavian artery (LSA) to assess whether mandatory preoperative carotid-subclavian bypass or transposition is necessary., Methods: : Between February 2000 and November 2005, 255 patients were successfully treated with an endoluminal graft (ELG) to the DTA. Indications for intervention included atherosclerotic aneurysms (109/255, 42.7%), acute and chronic dissections (75/255, 29.4%), miscellaneous (41/255, 16.1%), and penetrating aortic ulcers (30/255, 11.8%). There were 151 males (151/255, 59.2%) and 104 females (104/255, 40.8%) with a mean age of 71 years (range, 23-91 years)., Results: : The LSA was completely covered with an ELG in 71 patients (71/255, 27.8%) and partially covered in 47 patients (47/255, 18.4%). In patients who had complete coverage of the LSA, 30 patients (30/71, 42.3%) had acute or chronic Type B dissections, 26 patients (26/71, 36.6%) had aneurysms, 11 patients (11/71, 15.5%) had miscellaneous aortic pathologies, and 4 patients (4/71, 5.6%) had pseudoaneurysms associated with prior coarctation repair. Fifteen patients (15/255, 5.9%) underwent preoperative carotid-subclavian bypass or transposition and subsequently underwent complete coverage of the LSA with an ELG. One patient (1/56, 1.8%) with complete coverage of the LSA required elective postoperative carotid-subclavian bypass secondary to left arm claudication., Conclusions: : Routine preoperative carotid-subclavian bypass is not necessary, except in select patients with a patent left internal mammary artery to the left anterior descending artery bypass graft or contralateral vertebral artery disease.

Open surgical repair of mycotic aneurysm is associated with a high surgical morbidity and mortality. The role of endovascular graft repair of mycotic aneurysm remains controversial because the graft material remains in contact with possibly infected tissue. We report an endovascular technique of customizing an abdominal endoluminal graft component to treat a suspected saccular thoracoabdominal mycotic aneurysm involving the takeoff of the celiac trunk.

Surgical repair of post-coarctation pseudoaneurysm is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Endovascular stent grafting is a minimally invasive approach to manage this condition. The small thoracic aorta provides a dilemma for endovascular stent grafting using available commercially available thoracic endografts. We describe a hybrid approach including a novel technique to customize various components of the abdominal endoluminal grafts to repair a post-coarctation pseudoaneurysm. The patient is doing well at 1-year follow-up with no endoleaks.

Repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysm is associated with high morbidity and mortality. We describe a hybrid approach to repair a Crawford type III thoracoabdominal aneurysm with antegrade deployment of the endoluminal graft through a side limb of the bifurcated inflow conduit. The advantage of this technique includes avoidance of thoracotomy, left heat bypass, hypothermia, and aortic cross clamping.

Ascending pseudoaneurysm is an infrequent complication of ascending aortic surgery. Redo operations are often associated with a high surgical morbidity and mortality. Endovascular management of ascending aortic pathologies with endoluminal graft therapies are challenging due to short landing zones and the fear of flow obstruction to the coronaries and brachiocephalic circulation. We report mid-term follow-up of the management of an ascending aortic pseudoaneurysm using a an Amplatz septal occluder (AGA Medical Corp, Golden Valley, MN) in a 51-year-old man considered at high risk for conventional open surgical repair.

Between 43,000 and 47,000 people die annually in the United States from diseases of the aorta and its branches and continues to increase. For the thoracic aorta, these diseases are increasingly treated by stent-grafting. No prospective randomized study exists comparing stent-grafting and open surgical treatment, including for disease subgroups. Currently, one stent-graft device is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms although two new devices are expected to obtain FDA approval in 2008. Stent-graft devices are used "off label" or under physician Investigational Device Exemption studies for other indications such as traumatic rupture of the aorta and aortic dissection. Early first-generation devices suffered from problems such as stroke with insertion, ascending aortic dissection or aortic penetration from struts, vascular injury, graft collapse, endovascular leaks, graft material failure, continued aneurysm expansion or rupture, and migration or kinking; however, the newer iterations coming to market have been considerably improved. Although the devices have been tested in pulse duplicators out to 10 years, long-term durability is not known, particularly in young patients. The long-term consequences of repeated computed tomography scans for checking device integrity and positioning on the risk of irradiation-induced cancer remains of concern in young patients. This document (1) reviews the natural history of aortic disease, indications for repair, outcomes after conventional open surgery, currently available devices, and insights from outcomes of randomized studies using stent-grafts for abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery, the latter having been treated for a longer time by stent-grafts; and (2) offers suggestions for treatment.

Gastric duplication cysts in adults are very rare and usually found incidentally during evaluation for an unrelated ailment. When they are found in close proximity to the pancreas, they can be confused with cystic neoplasms of the pancreas, which are typically also asymptomatic yet more common. As part of the evaluation of cystic pancreatic lesions, cyst fluid analysis for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is undertaken to determine malignant potential. Herein we present two cases of cystic lesions thought to arise from the pancreas found to have elevated preoperative cystic CEA levels. At operation, they were found to be gastric duplication cysts and were resected. We report the histologic findings and review of the current literature.

Traumatic thoracic aortic disruption is a life-threatening lesion associated with a high surgical mortality. Endovascular stent graft repair is a minimal invasive approach that does not require a thoracotomy, aortic cross clamping and cardiopulmonary bypass. We report the use of an endoluminal graft to treat a 58-year-old male, who sustained multiple injuries including thoracic aortic disruption in a sky-diving accident due to failure of deployment of his parachute.

Treatment of the small thoracic aorta is not currently amenable to standard endovascular repair. New customized endovascular approaches are necessary for these patients who are not candidates, for open repair. We describe a novel endovascular repair of a thoracic aortic pseudoaneurysm associated with a prior coarctation repair.

Objective: Although endovascular repair of the descending thoracic aorta has emerged as a viable treatment option, little is known about its potential to treat patients diagnosed with aortobronchial fistulas. We reviewed our comprehensive thoracic endografting experience with regard to the endovascular management and subsequent outcome of patients with aortobronchial fistulas to assess whether endoluminal graft repair is a realistic option., Methods: Between February 2000 and November 2005, 255 patients were successfully treated with an endoluminal graft to the descending thoracic aorta. Indications for intervention included: atherosclerotic aneurysms (109/255, 42.7%), acute and chronic dissections (75/255, 29.4%), miscellaneous (34/255, 13.3%), penetrating aortic ulcers (30/255, 11.8%), and aortobronchial fistulas (7/255, 2.7%)., Results: Average patient age was 73.4 +/- 10.1 years, with 4 male patients (4/7, 57.1%) and 3 female patients (3/7, 42.9%). All patients presented with hemoptysis, with 1 patient (1/7, 14.3%) requiring preoperative blood transfusion. Three patients (3/7, 42.9%) were diagnosed with atherosclerotic aneurysms, 3 patients (3/7, 42.9%) had pseudoaneurysms associated with prior open surgical repair, and 1 patient (1/7, 14.3%) had a prior endoluminal graft placed for a traumatic aortic transection. No standard postoperative antibiotic regimen was followed. There were no endoleaks, no incidences of paraplegia, and no endoluminal graft infections. Survival was 100% (7/7) at both 30 days and 1 year, and all patients are currently alive. Follow-up computed tomography was available for all 7 patients, with an average follow-up of 42.6 +/- 28.5 months., Conclusions: Endovascular management of aortobronchial fistulas appears to be safe and well tolerated, even in surgically high-risk patients, with minimal risk of prosthesis infection. Long-term surveillance and continued investigation are warranted.