Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1065, U.S.A., College of Pharmacy, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1065, U.S.A., FMC Corporation, Princeton, NJ 08543, U.S.A., Ozturk, A.G., Ozturk, Sadettin S., Palsson, Bernhard??., Wheatley, T.A., Dressman, Jennifer B., Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1065, U.S.A., College of Pharmacy, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1065, U.S.A., FMC Corporation, Princeton, NJ 08543, U.S.A., Ozturk, A.G., Ozturk, Sadettin S., Palsson, Bernhard??., Wheatley, T.A., and Dressman, Jennifer B.
Studies were conducted to determine the mechanism of drug release from pellets coated with an ethylcellulose-based pseudolatex widely accepted for use as a sustained release coating for pharmaceuticals. Possible mechanisms for release include solution/diffusion through the continuous polymer phase and/or plasticizer channels, diffusion through aqueous pores and osmotically driven release through aqueous pores. To distinguish between these mechanisms, the release rate was studied as a function of coating thickness, plasticizer content, and osmotic pressure in the dissolution medium. As the coating thickness was increased from 9 to 50 [mu]m, the rate of release fell from 9.93[middle dot]10-3 to 1.71[middle dot]10-3 g phenylpropanolamine (PPA)[middle dot]HCl/100 ml h in an inversely proportional manner. Release as a function of plasticizer content was studied over the range 12 to 24% dibutyl sebacate (DBS). At 18 or 24% DBS, the rates of release of PPA[middle dot]HCl were virtually identical, about 50% of PPA[middle dot]HCl in six hours. At 12% DBS through, over 80% was released in the first hour. Surface area measurements and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed that the larger surface area of the 12% DBS batch was attributable to the presence of cracks in the coating. These results indicated that while the plasticizer is important in terms of forming a continuous film, diffusion through plasticizer channels is unlikely to make a significant contribution to the overall release rate. Release was also studied as a function of the osmotic pressure in the medium. A plot of release rate vs. osmotic pressure revealed an inverse linear relationship with a nonzero intercept. The steep dependency of release rate on osmotic pressure of the medium suggested that osmotically driven release is a major mechanism for release, while the nonzero intercept indicated some contribution from diffusion mechanisms. For all batches, SEM indicated that the film exhibited pores approximat