Search

Adult survivors of childhood maltreatment can be resilient when they have adequate psychosocial resources to cope with maltreatment-related sequelae; however, interpersonal problems may influence the effectiveness of such resources. This study used a schema activation experimental paradigm to test the benefit of social support cognitions on emotional reactivity in adult survivors, while also testing for the moderating role of interpersonal problems and the mediating role of stress appraisal. Young women (N = 126, ages = 18-23) with histories of childhood maltreatment were administered an anger provocation stressor task while their cardiac activity, state anger, and stress appraisals were assessed. Prior to the stressor, women were randomly assigned to either a support schema condition or an acquaintance schema (control) condition, in which they were asked to think and write about either a supportive person or casual acquaintance. The support schema condition demonstrated the least emotional reactivity as evidenced by subjective anger and heart-rate variability, and this outcome was strongest for those with high interpersonal problems. Also, stress appraisals, particularly feeling intimidated, partially mediated the support schema and emotional reactivity relationship. These findings suggest that maltreated women can regulate anger by activating their social support schema. Moreover, support schema may be an important focus of intervention for adult survivors with high interpersonal problems., (© The Author(s) 2015.)

The current retrospective study examined thought control strategies, or cognitive techniques individuals use to deal with unpleasant thoughts following stressful events, as potential mediators of adjustment in young women with histories of child sexual abuse (CSA). In a sample of 76 undergraduate women who self-reported on abuse experiences, thought control strategies, and current trauma symptoms, several key findings emerged: (i) Greater severity of the CSA event was associated with greater reported use of worry and punishment strategies and less use of social control strategies; (ii) Increased use of worry and punishment strategies following the CSA event was associated with greater levels of trauma symptoms, while increased use of social control strategies following the CSA event was associated with lower levels of trauma symptoms; and (iii) Worry, punishment, and social control strategies served as mediators between CSA severity and trauma symptoms. The results suggest that thought control strategies, specifically increased worry and punishment, and decreased social control, play a vital role in understanding adjustment after CSA. Future research should examine the roles of these cognitive control strategies as possible avenues of intervention following CSA.