If a and /3 are ordinals, a < /3, and / a ? a, then a + 1 < P. The first result of this paper shows that the restriction of this statement to countable well orderings is provably equivalent to ACAO, a subsystem of second order arithmetic introduced by Friedman. The proof of the equivalence is reminiscent of Dekker's construction of a hypersimple set. An application of the theorem yields the equivalence of the set comprehension scheme ACAo and an arithmetical transfinite induction scheme. Almost every theorem of ordinal arithmetic that has been analyzed in the framework of reverse mathematics is either provable in RCAo or equivalent to ATRo. One notable exception is Girard's proof that ACAo is equivalent to the assertion that ordinal exponentiation preserves well orderings. (See [6] or [7] for a proof.) As shown below, ACAo is also necessary and sufficient to prove the equivalence of two natural definitions of strict inequality for ordinals. Furthermore, this result leads to a precise analysis of the logical strength of an arithmetical transfinite induction scheme. This paper uses some axiom systems introduced by Friedman [4]. RCAo, ACAo, and ATRo are subsystems of second order arithmetic in which induction is restricted to Y? formulas with parameters, and the only set existence principles are taken to be recursive (AO) comprehension, arithmetic comprehension, and a form of arithmetical transfinite recursion, respectively. In these theories, a countable well ordering is defined to be a set R coding a linear order of N, such that every nonempty subset of the field of R has an R-least element. In RCAO, this last statement is equivalent to the assertion that there are no infinite R-descending sequences. For a short introduction to the systems and the program of reverse mathematics, see Simpson [9]. More details on the encoding of well orderings and formalizations of arithmetical operations on them can be found in [5], [7], or [10]. Although technically our discussion is limited to arithmetical operations on countable well orderings, we use the typical notation for ordinal arithmetic. ?1. Two notions of strict inequality. If a and fi are well orderings, and there is an order preserving bijection between a and an initial segment of Pi, then we write Received April 7, 1997. 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. 03F35.