Search

Background: Novel wireless-based technologies can easily record pulse oximetry at home. One of the main parameters that are recorded in sleep studies is the time under 90% of SpO 2 (T90%) and the oxygen desaturation index 3% (ODI-3%). We assessed the association of T90% and/or ODI-3% in two different scenarios (a community-based study and a clinical setting) with all-cause mortality (primary outcome)., Methods: We included all individuals from the Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS, community-based cohort) and Santiago Obstructive Sleep Apnea (SantOSA, clinical cohort) with complete data at baseline and follow-up. Two measures of hypoxemia (T90% and ODI-3%) were our primary exposures. The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) per standard deviation (pSD) between T90% and incident all-cause mortality (primary outcome) were determined by adjusted Cox regression models. In the secondary analysis, to assess whether T90% varies across clinical factors, anthropometrics, abdominal obesity, metabolic rate, and SpO 2 , we conducted linear regression models. Incremental changes in R 2 were conducted to test the hypothesis., Results: A total of 4323 (56% male, median 64 years old, follow-up: 12 years, 23% events) and 1345 (77% male, median 55 years old, follow-up: 6 years, 11.6% events) patients were included in SHHS and SantOSA, respectively. Every 1 SD increase in T90% was associated with an adjusted HR of 1.18 [95% CI: 1.10-1.26] (p value < 0.001) in SHHS and HR 1.34 [95% CI: 1.04-1.71] (p value = 0.021) for all-cause mortality in SantOSA. Conversely, ODI-3% was not associated with worse outcomes. R 2 explains 62% of the variability in T90%. The main contributors were baseline-mean change in SpO 2 , baseline SpO 2 , respiratory events, and age., Conclusion: The findings suggest that T90% may be an important marker of wellness in clinical and community-based scenarios. Although this nonspecific metric varies across the populations, ventilatory changes during sleep rather than other physiological or comorbidity variables explain their variability., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Objective  To evaluate the clinical utility of the Baveno classification in predicting incident cardiovascular mortality after five years of follow-up in a clinic-based cohort of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Materials and Methods  We evaluated the reproducibility of the Baveno classification using data from the Santiago Obstructive Sleep Apnea (SantOSA) study. The groups were labeled Baveno A (minor symptoms and comorbidities), B (severe symptoms and minor comorbidities), C (minor symptoms and severe comorbidities), and D (severe symptoms and comorbidities). Within-group comparisons were performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc tests. The associations between groups and incident cardiovascular mortality were determined through the Mantel-Cox and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) adjusted by covariables. Results  A total of 1,300 OSA patients were included (Baveno A: 27.7%; B: 28%; C: 16.8%; and D: 27.5%). The follow-up was of 5.4 years. Compared to Baveno A, the fully-adjusted risk of cardiovascular mortality with Baveno B presented an HR of 1.38 (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 0.14-13.5; p  = 0.78); with Baveno C, it was of 1.71 (95%CI: 0.18-16.2; p  = 0.63); and, with Baveno D, of 1.04 (95%CI: 0.12-9.2; p  = 0.98). We found no interactions involving Baveno group, sex and OSA severity. Discussion  Among OSA patients, the Baveno classification can describe different subgroups. However, its utility in identifying incident cardiovascular mortality is unclear. Long-term follow-up studies and the inclusion of demographic variables in the classification could improve its ability to detect a high-risk phenotype associated with cardiovascular mortality. Conclusion  The Baveno classification serves as a valuable method for categorizing varying groups of patients afflicted with OSA. Nevertheless, its precision in identifying occurrence of cardiovascular mortality is still unclear., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interests The authors have no conflict of interests to declare., (Brazilian Sleep Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ).)

Introduction: Severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) due to respiratory viruses is highly prevalent in Chile. Common etiologies include Influenza A and B, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), Hantavirus, and SARS-CoV-2 since 2020., Objective: To identify clinical and laboratory features associated with 20-day mortality in severe viral CAP in a high complexity health care center in southern Chile., Methods: The observational study included two cohorts of patients with severe CAP according to IDSA/ATS criteria: the years 2013-2018 (No COVID-19) and the year 2020 (COVID-19). Sociodemographic, clinical, laboratory, and 30-day mortality data were collected. We used Chi-square and Student's T for categorical and continuous variables. We used a binary logistic regression model for mortality analysis, reporting the results as Odd ratios (ORs)., Results: Mortality at 30 days was: Hantavirus 54.4%, Influenza H1N1 36.8%, other influenza 30.4%, RSV 25%, and COVID-19 23.6%. We found no significant difference regarding type of virus (COVID-19 or NO COVID-19). Mortality was associated with older age (OR: 4.6; p-value < 0.01), immunosuppression (OR: 5.8; p-value 0.01), and cyanosis (OR: 3.8, p-value 0.02)., Conclusion: COVID-19 was not associated with an increased risk of 30-day mortality compared to other common respiratory viruses in our study. Older age, immunosuppression, and cyanosis were associated with higher risk among patients with severe viral CAP.

The osteoporotic hip fracture is associated with a high impact on morbidity, mortality, and health expenditure. The Chilean health system is made up of a mixed care system, with the public system called FONASA and the private system called ISAPRE. The people with lower incomes are listed on FONASA and correspond to 80.8% of the population. The aims of this study were to describe the incidence of hip fracture in the Chilean population from the age of 45 years and to estimate the direct medical cost of this disease. The records of the Department of the Health Statistics and Information of the Ministry of Health were used, from which the number of national hospital discharges due to hip fractures was obtained (codes S720, S721, and S722 of the ICD-10), in adults aged 45 years or older, by sex, from 2006 to 2017. The cost of osteoporotic hip fracture treatment in the public health system was obtained from the data of the surgical treatment according to the payment method associated with diagnosis (PAD bonus). A surgical intervention budget was used in a private clinic to calculate the direct cost of osteoporotic hip fracture in the private system. Between 2006 and 2017, the number of hospital discharges due to osteoporotic hip fracture in adults aged 45 years and older has increased progressively, registering 9.583 hospital discharges for this cause in 2017, which corresponds to 50% more than those recorded in 2006, with a 3 : 1 F/M ratio. The mean annual rate of hip fractures is 148.7 per 100,000 inhabitants aged above 45 years. The individual cost of managing an osteoporotic hip fracture in the public system was USD$ 3,919, and USD$ 9,092 in the private health system. The incidence of hip fracture was comparable with data from Southern European countries and from neighboring countries, such as Argentina and Uruguay. Hospitalization cost of hip fracture in Chile was 34 million USD per year. Hip fracture constitutes a serious healthcare problem in Chile, and efforts for the prevention and management of osteoporosis are needed., Competing Interests: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper., (Copyright © 2020 Iván Quevedo et al.)