Search

Your search keyword '"Weiss, N. S."' showing total 738 results
Start Over Author "Weiss, N. S."
738 results on '"Weiss, N. S."'

3. Long-term outcomes of switching to gonadotrophins versus continuing with clomiphene citrate, with or without intrauterine insemination, in women with normogonadotropic anovulation and clomiphene failure: follow-up study of a factorial randomized clinical trial

Author

Bordewijk, E M, Jannink, T I, Weiss, N S, Vries, T de, Nahuis, M, Hoek, A, Goddijn, M, Mol, B W, Wely, M van, and group, M-ovin study

Subjects
ARTIFICIAL insemination, INDUCED ovulation, ANOVULATION, SCIENCE education, PREGNANCY outcomes, RESEARCH & development, CLOMIPHENE
Abstract

STUDY QUESTION What are the long-term outcomes after allocation to use of gonadotrophins versus clomiphene citrate (CC) with or without IUI in women with normogonadotropic anovulation and clomiphene failure? SUMMARY ANSWER About four in five women with normogonadotropic anovulation and CC failure had a live birth, with no evidence of a difference in pregnancy outcomes between the allocated groups. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY CC has long been used as first line treatment for ovulation induction in women with normogonadotropic anovulation. Between 2009 and 2015, a two-by-two factorial multicentre randomized clinical trial in 666 women with normogonadotropic anovulation and six cycles of CC failure was performed (M-ovin trial). This study compared a switch to gonadotrophins with continued treatment with CC for another six cycles, with or without IUI within 8 months. Switching to gonadotrophins increased the chance of conception leading to live birth by 11% over continued treatment with CC after six failed ovulatory cycles, at a cost of €15 258 per additional live birth. The addition of IUI did not significantly increase live birth rates. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION In order to investigate the long-term outcomes of switching to gonadotrophins versus continuing treatment with CC, and undergoing IUI versus continuing with intercourse, we conducted a follow-up study. The study population comprised all women who participated in the M-ovin trial. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS The participating women were asked to complete a web-based questionnaire. The primary outcome of this study was cumulative live birth. Secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancies, multiple pregnancies, miscarriage, stillbirth, ectopic pregnancy, fertility treatments, neonatal outcomes and pregnancy complications. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE We approached 564 women (85%), of whom 374 (66%) responded (184 allocated to gonadotrophins; 190 to CC). After a median follow-up time of 8 years, 154 women in the gonadotrophin group had a live birth (83.7%) versus 150 women in the CC group (78.9%) (relative risk (RR) 1.06, 95% CI 0.96–1.17). A second live birth occurred in 85 of 184 women (49.0%) in the gonadotrophin group and in 85 of 190 women (44.7%) in the CC group (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.83–1.29). Women allocated to gonadotrophins had a third live birth in 6 of 184 women (3.3%) and women allocated to CC had a third live birth in 14 of 190 women (7.4%). There were respectively 12 and 11 twins in the gonadotrophin and CC groups. The use of fertility treatments in the follow-up period was comparable between both groups. In the IUI group, a first live birth occurred in 158 of 192 women (82.3%) and while in the intercourse group, 146 of 182 women (80.2%) reached at least one live birth (RR: 1.03 95% CI 0.93–1.13; 2.13%, 95% CI −5.95, 10.21). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION We have complete follow-up results for 57% of the women. There were 185 women who did not respond to the questionnaire, while 102 women had not been approached due to missing contact details. Five women had not started the original trial. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Women with normogonadotropic anovulation and CC failure have a high chance of reaching at least one live birth. In terms of pregnancy rates, the long-term differences between initially switching to gonadotrophins are small compared to continuing treatment with CC. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The original study received funding from the Dutch Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw number: 80-82310-97-12067). A.H. reports consultancy for development and implementation of a lifestyle App, MyFertiCoach, developed by Ferring Pharmaceutical Company. M.G. receives unrestricted grants for scientific research and education from Ferring, Merck and Guerbet. B.W.M. is supported by an NHMRC Investigatorgrant (GNT1176437). B.W.M. reports consultancy for ObsEva and Merck and travel support from Merck. All other authors have nothing to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER This follow-up study was registered in the OSF Register, https://osf.io/pf24m. The original M-ovin trial was registered in the Netherlands Trial Register, number NTR1449. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

5. Gonadotrophins versus clomiphene citrate with or without IUI in women with normogonadotropic anovulation and clomiphene failure: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Author

Bordewijk, E. M., Weiss, N. S., Nahuis, M. J., Bayram, N., van Hooff, M. H. A., Boks, D. E. S., Perquin, D. A. M., Janssen, C. A. H., van Golde, R. J. T., Lambalk, C. B., Goddijn, M., Hompes, P. G., van der Veen, F., Mol, B. W. J., van Wely, M., Smeenk, J. M. J., Hoek, A., Broekmans, F. J. M., Fleischer, K., de Bruin, J. P., Kaaijk, E. M., Laven, J. S. E., Hendriks, D. J., Gerards, M. H., Bourdrez, P., Gianotten, J., Koks, C., van Hooff, M., Kwee, J., Lambeek, A. F., van Unnik, A. F., Vrouenraets, F. P. J., Cohlen, B. J., van de Laar-van Asseldonk, T. A. M., Nap, A. W., van Rijn-van Weert, J. M., Vollebergh, J. H. A., Klijn, N. F., Rijnsaardt-Lukassen, H. G. M., Sluijmer, A. V., Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Obstetrics & Gynecology, Emergency Medicine, Erasmus School of Economics, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Neurology, Erasmus MC other, Obstetrics and gynaecology, APH - Health Behaviors & Chronic Diseases, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development (AR&D), VU University medical center, ACS - Atherosclerosis & ischemic syndromes, Amsterdam Neuroscience - Cellular & Molecular Mechanisms, Graduate School, APH - Methodology, APH - Personalized Medicine, ARD - Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrie & Gynaecologie, MUMC+: MA Medische Staf Obstetrie Gynaecologie (9), and RS: GROW - R4 - Reproductive and Perinatal Medicine

Subjects
Male, Pregnancy Rate, Cost effectiveness, Cost-Benefit Analysis, medicine.medical_treatment, M-OVIN, law.invention, IUI, Indirect costs, 0302 clinical medicine, Randomized controlled trial, Pregnancy, law, FSH, Treatment Failure, 030212 general & internal medicine, Birth Rate, Insemination, Artificial, CLOMIFENE CITRATE, Netherlands, 030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine, Obstetrics, Rehabilitation, CYCLES, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Health Care Costs, Cost-effectiveness analysis, POLYCYSTIC-OVARY-SYNDROME, Female, Live birth, Infertility, Female, Live Birth, Anovulation, Adult, medicine.medical_specialty, Clomiphene, Healthcare improvement science Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 18], 03 medical and health sciences, clomiphene citrate, medicine, Humans, cost-effectiveness, gonadotrophins, business.industry, INFERTILE WOMEN, Fertility Agents, Female, medicine.disease, Pregnancy rate, OVULATION INDUCTION, Reproductive Medicine, polycystic ovary syndrome, SINGLETON, Ovulation induction, business, Gonadotropins
Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Are six cycles of ovulation induction with gonadotrophins more cost-effective than six cycles of ovulation induction with clomiphene citrate (CC) with or without IUI in normogonadotropic anovulatory women not pregnant after six ovulatory cycles with CC?SUMMARY ANSWER: Both gonadotrophins and IUI are more expensive when compared with CC and intercourse, and gonadotrophins are more effective than CC.WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: In women with normogonadotropic anovulation who ovulate but do not conceive after six cycles with CC, medication is usually switched to gonadotrophins, with or without IUI. The cost-effectiveness of these changes in policy is unknown.STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We performed an economic evaluation of ovulation induction with gonadotrophins compared with CC with or without IUI in a two-by-two factorial multicentre randomized controlled trial in normogonadotropic anovulatory women not pregnant after six ovulatory cycles with CC. Between December 2008 and December 2015 women were allocated to six cycles with gonadotrophins plus IUI, six cycles with gonadotrophins plus intercourse, six cycles with CC plus IUI or six cycles with CC plus intercourse. The primary outcome was conception leading to a live birth achieved within 8 months of randomization.PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis on direct medical costs. We calculated the direct medical costs of ovulation induction with gonadotrophins versus CC and of IUI versus intercourse in six subsequent cycles. We included costs of medication, cycle monitoring, interventions, and pregnancy leading to live birth. Resource use was collected from the case report forms and unit costs were derived from various sources. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) for gonadotrophins compared to CC and for IUI compared to intercourse. We used non-parametric bootstrap resampling to investigate the effect of uncertainty in our estimates. The analysis was performed according to the intention-to-treat principle.MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: We allocated 666 women in total to gonadotrophins and IUI (n = 166), gonadotrophins and intercourse (n = 165), CC and IUI (n = 163), or CC and intercourse (n = 172). Mean direct medical costs per woman receiving gonadotrophins or CC were (sic)4495 versus (sic)3006 (cost difference of (sic)1475 (95% CI: (sic)1457-(sic)1493)). Live birth rates were 52% in women allocated to gonadotrophins and 41% in those allocated to CC (relative risk (RR) 1.24: 95% CI: 1.05-1.46). The ICER was (sic)15 258 (95% CI: (sic)8721 to (sic)63 654) per additional live birth with gonadotrophins. Mean direct medical costs per woman allocated to IUI or intercourse were (sic)4497 versus (sic)3005 (cost difference of (sic)1510 (95% CI: (sic)1492-(sic)1529)). Live birth rates were 49% in women allocated to IUI and 43% in those allocated to intercourse (RR = 1.14: 95% CI: 0.97-1.35). The ICER was (sic)24 361 (95% CI: (sic)-11 290 to (sic)85 172) per additional live birth with IUI.LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: We allowed participating hospitals to use their local protocols for ovulation induction and IUI, which may have led to variation in costs, but which increases generalizability. Indirect costs generated by transportation or productivity loss were not included. We did not evaluate letrozole, which is potentially more effective than CC.WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Gonadotrophins are more effective, but more expensive than CC, therefore, the use of gonadotrophins in women with normogonadotropic anovulation who have not conceived after six ovulatory CC cycles depends on society's willingness to pay for an additional child. In view of the uncertainty around the cost-effectiveness estimate of IUI, these data are not sufficient to make recommendations on the use of IUI in these women. In countries where ovulation induction regimens are reimbursed, policy makers and health care professionals may use our results in their guidelines.STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This trial was funded by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw number: 80-82310-97-12067). The Eudract number for this trial is 2008-006171-73. The Sponsor's Protocol Code Number is P08-40. CBLA reports unrestricted grant support from Merck and Ferring. BWM is supported by a NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (GNT1082548) and reports consultancy for Merck, ObsEva and Guerbet.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR1449.

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

19. Gonadotrophins versus clomiphene citrate with or without IUI in women with normogonadotropic anovulation and clomiphene failure: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Author

MS VPG/Gynaecologie, Child Health, Circulatory Health, Bordewijk, E. M., Weiss, N. S., Nahuis, M. J., Bayram, N., Van Hooff, M. H.A., Boks, D. E.S., Perquin, D. A.M., Janssen, C. A.H., Van Golde, R. J.T., Lambalk, C. B., Goddijn, M., Hompes, P. G., Van Der Veen, F., Mol, B. W.J., Van Wely, M., Smeenk, J. M.J., Hoek, A., Broekmans, F. J.M., Fleischer, K., De Bruin, J. P., Kaaijk, E. M., Laven, J. S.E., Hendriks, D. J., Gerards, M. H., Bourdrez, P., Gianotten, J., Koks, C., Van Hooff, M., Kwee, J., Lambeek, A. F., Van Unnik, A. F., Vrouenraets, F. P.J., Cohlen, B. J., Van De Laar-Van Asseldonk, T. A.M., Nap, A. W., Van Rijn-Van Weert, J. M., Vollebergh, J. H.A., Klijn, N. F., Rijnsaardt-Lukassen, H. G.M., Sluijmer, A. V., MS VPG/Gynaecologie, Child Health, Circulatory Health, Bordewijk, E. M., Weiss, N. S., Nahuis, M. J., Bayram, N., Van Hooff, M. H.A., Boks, D. E.S., Perquin, D. A.M., Janssen, C. A.H., Van Golde, R. J.T., Lambalk, C. B., Goddijn, M., Hompes, P. G., Van Der Veen, F., Mol, B. W.J., Van Wely, M., Smeenk, J. M.J., Hoek, A., Broekmans, F. J.M., Fleischer, K., De Bruin, J. P., Kaaijk, E. M., Laven, J. S.E., Hendriks, D. J., Gerards, M. H., Bourdrez, P., Gianotten, J., Koks, C., Van Hooff, M., Kwee, J., Lambeek, A. F., Van Unnik, A. F., Vrouenraets, F. P.J., Cohlen, B. J., Van De Laar-Van Asseldonk, T. A.M., Nap, A. W., Van Rijn-Van Weert, J. M., Vollebergh, J. H.A., Klijn, N. F., Rijnsaardt-Lukassen, H. G.M., and Sluijmer, A. V.

Published
2019

21. Gonadotrophins or clomiphene citrate in women with normogonadotropic anovulation and CC failure: does the endometrium matter?

Author

Bordewijk, E M, Weiss, N S, Nahuis, M J, Kwee, J, Lambeek, A F, Unnik, G A van, Vrouenraets, F P J, Cohlen, B J, Asseldonk, T A M van de Laar-van, Lambalk, C B, Goddijn, M, Hompes, P G, Veen, F van der, Mol, B W J, Wely, M van, group, on behalf of the M-ovin study, van Unnik, G A, van de Laar-van Asseldonk, T A M, van der Veen, F, and van Wely, M

Subjects
*RESEARCH & development, *ANOVULATION, *TREATMENT effectiveness, *HUMAN artificial insemination, *CITRATES, *BIRTH rate, *LOGISTIC regression analysis, *CLOMIPHENE, *RESEARCH, *RESEARCH methodology, *MEDICAL cooperation, *EVALUATION research, *GONADOTROPIN, *PREGNANCY outcomes, *COMPARATIVE studies, *INDUCED ovulation, *ENDOMETRIUM
Abstract

Study Question: Is endometrial thickness (EMT) a biomarker to select between women who should switch to gonadotropins and those who could continue clomiphene citrate (CC) after six failed ovulatory cycles?Summary Answer: Using a cut-off of 7 mm for EMT, we can distinguish between women who are better off switching to gonadotropins and those who could continue CC after six earlier failed ovulatory CC cycles.What Is Already Known: For women with normogonadotropic anovulation, CC has been a long-standing first-line treatment in conjunction with intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI). We recently showed that a switch to gonadotropins increases the chance of live birth by 11% in these women over continued treatment with CC after six failed ovulatory cycles, at a cost of €15 258 per additional live birth. It is unclear whether EMT can be used to identify women who can continue on CC with similar live birth rates without the extra costs of gonadotropins.Study Design, Size, Duration: Between 8 December 2008 and 16 December 2015, 666 women with CC failure were randomly assigned to receive an additional six cycles with a change to gonadotropins (n = 331) or an additional six cycles continuing with CC (n = 335), both in conjunction with intercourse or IUI. The primary outcome was conception leading to live birth within 8 months after randomisation. EMT was measured mid-cycle before randomisation during their sixth ovulatory CC cycle. The EMT was available in 380 women, of whom 190 were allocated to gonadotropins and 190 were allocated to CC.Participants/materials, Setting, Methods: EMT was determined in the sixth CC cycle prior to randomisation. We tested for interaction of EMT with the treatment effect using logistic regression. We performed a spline analysis to evaluate the association of EMT with chance to pregnancy leading to a live birth in the next cycles and to determine the best cut-off point. On the basis of the resulting cut-off point, we calculated the relative risk and 95% CI of live birth for gonadotropins versus CC at EMT values below and above this cut-off point. Finally, we calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER).Main Results and the Role Of Chance: Mid-cycle EMT in the sixth cycle interacted with treatment effect (P < 0.01). Spline analyses showed a cut-off point of 7 mm. There were 162 women (45%) who had an EMT ≤ 7 mm in the sixth ovulatory cycle and 218 women (55%) who had an EMT > 7 mm. Among the women with EMT ≤ 7 mm, gonadotropins resulted in a live birth in 44 of 79 women (56%), while CC resulted in a live birth in 28 of 83 women (34%) (RR 1.57, 95% CI 1.13-2.19). Per additional live birth with gonadotropins, the ICER was €9709 (95% CI: €5117 to €25 302). Among the women with EMT > 7 mm, gonadotropins resulted in a live birth in 53 of 111 women (48%) while CC resulted in a live birth in 52 of 107 women (49%) (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.75-1.29).Limitations, Reasons For Caution: This was a post hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) and therefore mid-cycle EMT measurements before randomisation during their sixth ovulatory CC cycle were not available for all included women.Wider Implications Of the Findings: In women with six failed ovulatory cycles on CC and an EMT ≤ 7 mm in the sixth cycle, we advise switching to gonadotropins, since it improves live birth rate over continuing treatment with CC at an extra cost of €9709 to achieve one additional live birth. If the EMT > 7 mm, we advise to continue treatment with CC, since live birth rates are similar to those with gonadotropins, without the extra costs.Study Funding/competing Interest(s): The original MOVIN trial received funding from the Dutch Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw number: 80-82310-97-12067). C.B.L.A. reports unrestricted grant support from Merck and Ferring. B.W.M. is supported by a NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (GNT1082548) and reports consultancy for Merck, ObsEva, IGENOMIX and Guerbet. All other authors have nothing to declare.Trial Registration Number: Netherlands Trial Register, number NTR1449. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

23. Menopausal hormone use and ovarian cancer risk : Individual participant meta-analysis of 52 epidemiological studies

Author

Gapstur, S. M., Patel, A. V., Banks, E., Dal Maso, L., Talamini, R., Chetrit, A., Hirsh-Yechezkel, G., Lubin, F., Sadetzki, S., Beral, V., Bull, D., Cairns, B., Crossley, B., Gaitskell, K., Goodill, A., Green, J., Hermon, C., Key, T., Moser, K., Reeves, G., Sitas, F., Collins, R., Peto, R., Gonzalez, C. A., Lee, N., Marchbanks, P., Ory, H. W., Peterson, H. B., Wingo, P. A., Martin, N., Silpisornkosol, S., Theetranont, C., Boosiri, B., Chutivongse, S., Jimakorn, P., Virutamasen, P., Wongsrichanalai, C., Goodman, M. T., Lidegaard, O., Kjaer, S. K., Morch, L. S., Tjonneland, A., Byers, T., Rohan, T., Mosgaard, B., Vessey, M., Yeates, D., Freudenheim, J. L., Titus, L. J., Chang-Claude, J., Kaaks, R., Anderson, K. E., Lazovich, D., Robien, K., Hampton, J., Newcomb, P. A., Rossing, M. A., Thomas, D. B., Weiss, N. S., Lokkegaard, E., Riboli, E., Clavel-Chapelon, F., Cramer, D., Hankinson, S. E., Tamimi, R. M., Tworoger, S. S., Franceschi, S., La Vecchia, C., Negri, E., Adami, H. O., Magnusson, C., Riman, T., Weiderpass, E., Wolk, A., Schouten, L. J., van den Brandt, P. A., Chantarakul, N., Koetsawang, S., Rachawat, D., Palli, D., Black, A., Brinton, L. A., Freedman, D. M., Hartge, P., Hsing, A. W., Jnr, J. V. Lacey, Lissowska, J., Hoover, R. N., Schairer, C., Babb, C., Urban, M., Graff-Iversen, S., Selmer, R., Bain, C. J., Green, A. C., Purdie, D. M., Siskind, V., Webb, P. M., Moysich, K., McCann, S. E., Hannaford, P., Kay, C., Binns, C. W., Lee, A. H., Zhang, M., Ness, R. B., Nasca, P., Coogan, P. F., Palmer, J. R., Rosenberg, L., Whittemore, A., Katsouyanni, K., Trichopoulou, A., Trichopoulos, D., Tzonou, A., Dabancens, A., Martinez, L., Molina, R., Salas, O., Lurie, G., Carney, M. E., Wilkens, L. R., Werner Hartman, Linda, Manjer, Jonas, Olsson, Håkan, Kumle, M., Grisso, J. A., Morgan, M., Wheeler, J. E., Edwards, R. P., Kelley, J. L., Modugno, F., Onland-Moret, N. C., Peeters, P. H. M., Casagrande, J., Pike, M. C., Wu, A. H., Canfell, K., Miller, A. B., Gram, I. T., Lund, E., McGowan, L., Shu, X. O., Zheng, W., Farley, T. M. M., Holck, S., Meirik, O., Risch, H. A., S. M. Gapstur, A. V. Patel, E. Bank, L. Dal Maso, R. Talamini, A. Chetrit, G. Hirsh Yechezkel, F. Lubin, S. Sadetzki, V. Beral, D. Bull, B. Cairn, B. Crossley, K. Gaitskell, A. Goodill, J. Green, C. Hermon, T. Key, K. Moser, G. Reeve, F. Sita, R. Collin, R. Peto, C. A. Gonzalez, N. Lee, P. Marchbank, H. W. Ory, H. B. Peterson, P. A. Wingo, N. Martin, S. Silpisornkosol, C. Theetranont, B. Boosiri, S. Chutivongse, P. Jimakorn, P. Virutamasen, C. Wongsrichanalai, M. T. Goodman, O. Lidegaard, S. K. Kjaer, L. S. Morch, A. Tjonneland, T. Byer, T. Rohan, B. Mosgaard, M. Vessey, D. Yeate, J. L. Freudenheim, L. J. Titu, J. Chang Claude, R. Kaak, K. E. Anderson, D. Lazovich, K. Robien, J. Hampton, P. A. Newcomb, M. A. Rossing, D. B. Thoma, N. S. Wei, E. Lokkegaard, E. Riboli, F. Clavel Chapelon, D. Cramer, S. E. Hankinson, R. M. Tamimi, S. S. Tworoger, S. Franceschi, C. La Vecchia, E. Negri, H. O. Adami, C. Magnusson, T. Riman, E. Weiderpa, A. Wolk, L. J. Schouten, P. A. van den Brandt, N. Chantarakul, S. Koetsawang, D. Rachawat, D. Palli, A. Black, L. A. Brinton, D. M. Freedman, P. Hartge, A. W. Hsing, J. V. L. Jnr, J. Lissowska, R. N. Hoover, C. Schairer, C. Babb, M. Urban, S. Graff Iversen, R. Selmer, C. J. Bain, A. C. Green, D. M. Purdie, V. Siskind, P. M. Webb, K. Moysich, S. E. McCann, P. Hannaford, C. Kay, C. W. Binn, A. H. Lee, M. Zhang, R. B. Ne, P. Nasca, P. F. Coogan, J. R. Palmer, L. Rosenberg, A. Whittemore, K. Katsouyanni, A. Trichopoulou, D. Trichopoulo, A. Tzonou, A. Dabancen, L. Martinez, R. Molina, O. Sala, G. Lurie, M. E. Carney, L. R. Wilken, L. Hartman, J. Manjer, H. Olsson, M. Kumle, J. A. Grisso, M. Morgan, J. E. Wheeler, R. P. Edward, J. L. Kelley, F. Modugno, N. C. Onland Moret, P. H. M. Peeter, J. Casagrande, M. C. Pike, A. H. Wu, K. Canfell, A. B. Miller, I. T. Gram, E. Lund, L. McGowan, X. O. Shu, W. Zheng, T. M. M. Farley, S. Holck, O. Meirik, H. A. Risch, Epidemiologie, RS: CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, RS: CAPHRI - R3 - Functioning, Participating and Rehabilitation, RS: CAPHRI - R5 - Optimising Patient Care, RS: GROW - Oncology, and RS: GROW - R1 - Prevention

Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty, medicine.medical_treatment, Etiology - Endogenous Factors in the Origin and Cause of Cancer, ovarian neoplasm, THERAPY, Medicine, General & Internal, Internal medicine, General & Internal Medicine, Epidemiology, middle aged, medicine, Cancer Type - Ovarian Cancer, estrogen replacement therapy, human, Prospective cohort study, medicine (all), Gynecology, Science & Technology, business.industry, drug administration schedule, WOMEN, risk assessment, Retrospective cohort study, General Medicine, 11 Medical And Health Sciences, medicine.disease, postmenopause, female, Meta-analysis, Relative risk, Cancer and Oncology, incidence, Hormone therapy, HEALTH, Risk assessment, Ovarian cancer, business, Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Abstract

SummaryBackgroundHalf the epidemiological studies with information about menopausal hormone therapy and ovarian cancer risk remain unpublished, and some retrospective studies could have been biased by selective participation or recall. We aimed to assess with minimal bias the effects of hormone therapy on ovarian cancer risk.MethodsIndividual participant datasets from 52 epidemiological studies were analysed centrally. The principal analyses involved the prospective studies (with last hormone therapy use extrapolated forwards for up to 4 years). Sensitivity analyses included the retrospective studies. Adjusted Poisson regressions yielded relative risks (RRs) versus never-use.FindingsDuring prospective follow-up, 12 110 postmenopausal women, 55% (6601) of whom had used hormone therapy, developed ovarian cancer. Among women last recorded as current users, risk was increased even with

Published
2015

24. Menopausal hormone use and ovarian cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis of 52 epidemiological studies

Author

Gapstur, S. M. Patel, A. V. Banks, E. Dal Maso, L. and Talamini, R. Chetrit, A. Hirsh-Yechezkel, G. Lubin, F. and Sadetzki, S. Beral, V. Bull, D. Cairns, B. Crossley, B. and Gaitskell, K. Goodill, A. Green, J. Hermon, C. Key, T. Moser, K. Reeves, G. Sitas, F. Collins, R. Peto, R. Gonzalez, C. A. Lee, N. Marchbanks, P. Ory, H. W. and Peterson, H. B. Wingo, P. A. Martin, N. Silpisornkosol, S. and Theetranont, C. Boosiri, B. Chutivongse, S. Jimakorn, P. and Virutamasen, P. Wongsrichanalai, C. Goodman, M. T. and Lidegaard, O. Kjaer, S. K. Morch, L. S. Tjonneland, A. and Byers, T. Rohan, T. Mosgaard, B. Vessey, M. Yeates, D. and Freudenheim, J. L. Titus, L. J. Chang-Claude, J. Kaaks, R. Anderson, K. E. Lazovich, D. Robien, K. Hampton, J. and Newcomb, P. A. Rossing, M. A. Thomas, D. B. Weiss, N. S. and Lokkegaard, E. Riboli, E. Clavel-Chapelon, F. Cramer, D. and Hankinson, S. E. Tamimi, R. M. Tworoger, S. S. and Franceschi, S. La Vecchia, C. Negri, E. Adami, H. O. and Magnusson, C. Riman, T. Weiderpass, E. Wolk, A. and Schouten, L. J. van den Brandt, P. A. Chantarakul, N. and Koetsawang, S. Rachawat, D. Palli, D. Black, A. Brinton, L. A. Freedman, D. M. Hartge, P. Hsing, A. W. Jnr, J. V. Lacey Lissowska, J. Hoover, R. N. Schairer, C. Babb, C. and Urban, M. Graff-Iversen, S. Selmer, R. Bain, C. J. and Green, A. C. Purdie, D. M. Siskind, V. Webb, P. M. and Moysich, K. McCann, S. E. Hannaford, P. Kay, C. Binns, C. W. Lee, A. H. Zhang, M. Ness, R. B. Nasca, P. and Coogan, P. F. Palmer, J. R. Rosenberg, L. Whittemore, A. and Katsouyanni, K. Trichopoulou, A. Trichopoulos, D. Tzonou, A. and Dabancens, A. Martinez, L. Molina, R. Salas, O. and Lurie, G. Carney, M. E. Wilkens, L. R. Hartman, L. and Manjer, J. Olsson, H. Kumle, M. Grisso, J. A. Morgan, M. and Wheeler, J. E. Edwards, R. P. Kelley, J. L. Modugno, F. and Onland-Moret, N. C. Peeters, P. H. M. Casagrande, J. and Pike, M. C. Wu, A. H. Canfell, K. Miller, A. B. Gram, I. T. Lund, E. McGowan, L. Shu, X. O. Zheng, W. Farley, T. M. M. Holck, S. Meirik, O. Risch, H. A. Collaborative Grp Epidemiological

Abstract

Background Half the epidemiological studies with information about menopausal hormone therapy and ovarian cancer risk remain unpublished, and some retrospective studies could have been biased by selective participation or recall. We aimed to assess with minimal bias the effects of hormone therapy on ovarian cancer risk. Methods Individual participant datasets from 52 epidemiological studies were analysed centrally. The principal analyses involved the prospective studies (with last hormone therapy use extrapolated forwards for up to 4 years). Sensitivity analyses included the retrospective studies. Adjusted Poisson regressions yielded relative risks (RRs) versus never-use. Findings During prospective follow-up, 12 110 postmenopausal women, 55% (6601) of whom had used hormone therapy, developed ovarian cancer. Among women last recorded as current users, risk was increased even with

Published
2015

26. Menarche, menopause, and breast cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis, including 118 964 women with breast cancer from 117 epidemiological studies

Author

Beral, V. Bull, D. Pirie, K. Reeves, G. Peto, R. and Skegg, D. LaVecchia, C. Magnusson, C. Pike, M. C. and Thomas, D. Hamajima, N. Hirose, K. Tajima, K. Rohan, T. and Friedenreich, C. M. Calle, E. E. Gapstur, S. M. Patel, A. V. Coates, R. J. Liff, J. M. Talamini, R. and Chantarakul, N. Koetsawang, S. Rachawat, D. Marcou, Y. and Kakouri, E. Duffy, S. W. Morabia, A. Schuman, L. and Stewart, W. Szklo, M. Coogan, P. F. Palmer, J. R. and Rosenberg, L. Band, P. Coldman, A. J. Gallagher, R. P. and Hislop, T. G. Yang, P. Cummings, S. R. Canfell, K. and Sitas, F. Chao, P. Lissowska, J. Horn-Ross, P. L. John, E. M. Kolonel, L. M. Nomura, A. M. Y. Ghiasvand, R. Hu, J. Johnson, K. C. Mao, Y. Callaghan, K. Crossley, B. and Goodill, A. Green, J. Hermon, C. Key, T. Lindgard, I. and Liu, B. Collins, R. Doll, R. Bishop, T. Fentiman, I. S. De Sanjose, S. Gonzaler, C. A. Lee, N. Marchbanks, P. and Ory, H. W. Peterson, H. B. Wingo, P. Ebeling, K. and Kunde, D. Nishan, P. Hopper, J. L. Eliassen, H. and Gajalakshmi, V. Martin, N. Pardthaisong, T. Silpisornkosol, S. Theetranont, C. Boosiri, B. Chutivongse, S. Jimakorn, P. Virutamasen, P. Wongsrichanalai, C. Neugut, A. and Santella, R. Baines, C. J. Kreiger, N. Miller, A. B. and Wall, C. Tjonneland, A. Jorgensen, T. Stahlberg, C. and Pedersen, A. Tonnes Flesch-Janys, D. Hakansson, N. Cauley, J. Heuch, I. Adami, H. O. Persson, I. Weiderpass, E. and Chang-Claude, J. Kaaks, R. McCredie, M. Paul, C. Spears, G. F. S. Iwasaki, M. Tsugane, S. Anderson, G. Daling, J. R. Hampton, J. Hutchinson, W. B. Li, C. I. Malone, K. and Mandelson, M. Newcomb, P. Noonan, E. A. Ray, R. M. and Stanford, J. L. Tang, M. T. C. Weiss, N. S. White, E. and Izquierdo, A. Viladiu, P. Fourkala, E. O. Jacobs, I. and Menon, U. Ryan, A. Cuevas, H. R. Ontiveros, P. Palet, A. and Salazar, S. B. Aristizabal, N. Cuadros, A. and Tryggvadottir, L. Tulinius, H. Riboli, E. Andrieu, N. and Bachelot, A. Le, M. G. Bremond, A. Gairard, B. Lansac, J. Piana, L. Renaud, R. Clavel-Chapelon, F. Fournier, A. and Touillaud, M. Mesrine, S. Chabbert-Buffet, N. and Boutron-Ruault, M. C. Wolk, A. Torres-Mejia, G. Franceschi, S. Romieu, I. Boyle, P. Lubin, F. Modan, B. Ron, E. and Wax, Y. Friedman, G. D. Hiatt, R. A. Levi, F. and Kosmelj, K. Primic-Zakelj, M. Ravnihar, B. Stare, J. and Ekbom, A. Erlandsson, G. Beeson, W. L. Fraser, G. Peto, J. Hanson, R. L. Leske, M. C. Mahoney, M. C. Nasca, P. C. Varma, A. O. Weinstein, A. L. Hartman, M. L. Olsson, H. Goldbohm, R. A. van den Brandt, P. A. Palli, D. and Teitelbaum, S. Apelo, R. A. Baens, J. de la Cruz, J. R. and Javier, B. Lacaya, L. B. Ngelangel, C. A. La Vecchia, C. and Negri, E. Marubini, E. Ferraroni, M. Gerber, M. and Richardson, S. Segala, C. Gatei, D. Kenya, P. Kungu, A. and Mati, J. G. Brinton, L. A. Freedman, M. Hoover, R. and Schairer, C. Ziegler, R. Banks, E. Spirtas, R. Lee, H. P. Rookus, M. A. van Leeuwen, F. E. Schoenberg, J. A. and Graff-Iversen, S. Selmer, R. Jones, L. McPherson, K. and Neil, A. Vessey, M. Yeates, D. Mabuchi, K. Preston, D. and Hannaford, P. Kay, C. McCann, S. E. Rosero-Bixby, L. and Gao, Y. T. Jin, F. Yuan, J-M Wei, H. Y. Yun, T. and Zhiheng, C. Berry, G. Booth, J. Cooper Jelihovsky, T. and MacLennan, R. Shearman, R. Hadjisavvas, A. Kyriacou, K. and Loisidou, M. Zhou, X. Wang, Q-S Kawai, M. Minami, Y. and Tsuji, I. Lund, E. Kumle, M. Stalsberg, H. Shu, X. O. and Zheng, W. Monninkhof, E. M. Onland-Moret, N. C. Peeters, P. H. M. Katsouyanni, K. Trichopoulou, A. Trichopoulos, D. and Tzonou, A. Baltzell, K. A. Dabancens, A. Martinez, L. and Molina, R. Salas, O. Alexander, F. E. Anderson, K. and Folsom, A. R. Gammon, M. D. Hulka, B. S. Millikan, R. and Chilvers, C. E. D. Lumachi, F. Bain, C. Schofield, F. and Siskind, V. Rebbeck, T. R. Bernstein, L. R. Enger, S. and Haile, R. W. Paganini-Hill, A. Ross, R. K. Ursin, G. Wu, A. H. Yu, M. C. Ewertz, Denmark M. Clarke, E. A. and Bergkvist, L. Gass, M. O'Sullivan, M. J. Kalache, A. and Farley, T. M. M. Holck, S. Meirik, O. Fukao, A. and Collaborative Grp Hormonal Factors Collaborative Grp Hormonal Factors S Hankinson Nurses Hlth Study I II

Subjects
skin and connective tissue diseases
Abstract

Background Menarche and menopause mark the onset and cessation, respectively, of ovarian activity associated with reproduction, and affect breast cancer risk. Our aim was to assess the strengths of their effects and determine whether they depend on characteristics of the tumours or the affected women. Methods Individual data from 117 epidemiological studies, including 118 964 women with invasive breast cancer and 306 091 without the disease, none of whom had used menopausal hormone therapy, were included in the analyses. We calculated adjusted relative risks (RRs) associated with menarche and menopause for breast cancer overall, and by tumour histology and by oestrogen receptor expression. Findings Breast cancer risk increased by a factor of 1.050 (95% CI 1.044-1.057; p < 0.0001) for every year younger at menarche, and independently by a smaller amount (1.029, 1.025-1.032; p < 0.0001), for every year older at menopause. Premenopausal women had a greater risk of breast cancer than postmenopausal women of an identical age (RR at age 45-54 years 1.43, 1.33-1.52, p < 0.001). All three of these associations were attenuated by increasing adiposity among postmenopausal women, but did not vary materially by women’s year of birth, ethnic origin, childbearing history, smoking, alcohol consumption, or hormonal contraceptive use. All three associations were stronger for lobular than for ductal tumours (p < 0.006 for each comparison). The effect of menopause in women of an identical age and trends by age at menopause were stronger for oestrogen receptor-positive disease than for oestrogen receptor-negative disease (p < 0.01 for both comparisons). Interpretation The effects of menarche and menopause on breast cancer risk might not be acting merely by lengthening women’s total number of reproductive years. Endogenous ovarian hormones are more relevant for oestrogen receptor-positive disease than for oestrogen receptor-negative disease and for lobular than for ductal tumours. Funding Cancer Research UK.

Published
2012

27. Ovarian cancer and smoking: individual participant meta-analysis including 28 114 women with ovarian cancer from 51 epidemiological studies

Author

Beral, V. Gaitskell, K. Hermon, C. Moser, K. Reeves, G. and Peto, R. Brinton, L. Marchbanks, P. Negri, E. Ness, R. Peeters, P. H. M. Vessey, M. Calle, E. E. Gapstur, S. M. Patel, A. V. Dal Maso, L. Talamini, R. Chetrit, A. and Hirsh-Yechezkel, G. Lubin, F. Sadetzki, S. Banks, E. and Bull, D. Callaghan, K. Crossley, B. Goodill, A. Green, J. Key, T. Sitas, F. Collins, R. Doll, R. Gonzalez, A. Lee, N. Ory, H. W. Peterson, H. B. Wingo, P. A. and Martin, N. Pardthaisong, T. Silpisornkosol, S. Theetranont, C. Boosiri, B. Chutivongse, S. Jimakorn, P. Virutamasen, P. Wongsrichanalai, C. Tjonneland, A. Titus-Ernstoff, L. and Byers, T. Rohan, T. Mosgaard, B. J. Yeates, D. and Freudenheim, J. L. Chang-Claude, J. Kaaks, R. Anderson, K. E. Folsom, A. Robien, K. Hampton, J. Newcomb, P. A. and Rossing, M. A. Thomas, D. B. Weiss, N. S. Riboli, E. and Clavel-Chapelon, F. Cramer, D. Hankinson, S. E. Tworoger, S. S. Franceschi, S. La Vecchia, C. Adami, H. O. Magnusson, C. Riman, T. Weiderpass, E. Wolk, A. Schouten, L. J. and van den Brandt, P. A. Chantarakul, N. Koetsawang, S. and Rachawat, D. Palli, D. Black, A. Freedman, D. M. Hartge, P. Hsing, A. W. Lacey, Jr., J. V. Hoover, R. N. and Schairer, C. Urban, M. Graff-Iversen, S. Selmer, R. and Bain, C. J. Green, A. C. Purdie, D. M. Siskind, V. Webb, P. M. Moysich, K. McCann, S. E. Hannaford, P. Kay, C. and Binns, C. W. Lee, A. H. Zhang, M. Nasca, P. Coogan, P. F. Palmer, J. R. Rosenberg, L. Kelsey, J. and Paffenbarger, R. Whittemore, A. Katsouyanni, K. and Trichopoulou, A. Trichopoulos, D. Tzonou, A. Dabancens, A. and Martinez, L. Molina, R. Salas, O. Goodman, M. T. and Lurie, G. Carney, M. E. Wilkens, L. R. Hartman, L. and Manjer, J. Olsson, H. Grisso, J. A. Morgan, M. Wheeler, J. E. Bunker, C. H. Edwards, R. P. Modugno, F. and Casagrande, J. Pike, M. C. Ross, R. K. Wu, A. H. Miller, A. B. Kumle, M. Gram, I. T. Lund, E. McGowan, L. and Shu, X. O. Zheng, W. Farley, T. M. M. Holck, S. Meirik, O. Risch, H. A. Collaborative Grp Epidemiological Natl Israeli Study Ovarian Canc Nurses Hlth Study

Abstract

Background Smoking has been linked to mucinous ovarian cancer, but its effects on other ovarian cancer subtypes and on overall ovarian cancer risk are unclear, and the findings from most studies with relevant data are unpublished. To assess these associations, we review the published and unpublished evidence. Methods Eligible epidemiological studies were identified by electronic searches, review articles, and discussions with colleagues. Individual participant data for 28 114 women with and 94 942 without ovarian cancer from 51 epidemiological studies were analysed centrally, yielding adjusted relative risks (RRs) of ovarian cancer in smokers compared with never smokers. Findings After exclusion of studies with hospital controls, in which smoking could have affected recruitment, overall ovarian cancer incidence was only slightly increased in current smokers compared with women who had never smoked (RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.11, p=0.01). Of 17 641 epithelial cancers with specified histology, 2314 (13%) were mucinous, 2360 (13%) endometrioid, 969 (5%) clear-cell, and 9086 (52%) serous. Smoking-related risks varied substantially across these subtypes (p(heterogeneity)

Published
2012

28. Ovarian Cancer and Body Size: Individual Participant Meta-Analysis Including 25,157 Women with Ovarian Cancer from 47 Epidemiological Studies

Author

Beral, V. Hermon, C. Peto, R. Reeves, G. Brinton, L. and Marchbanks, P. Negri, E. Ness, R. Peeters, P. H. M. and Vessey, M. Calle, E. E. Gapstur, S. M. Patel, A. V. Dal Maso, L. Talamini, R. Chetrit, A. Hirsh-Yechezkel, G. and Lubin, F. Sadetzki, S. Allen, N. Bull, D. Callaghan, K. and Crossley, B. Gaitskell, K. Goodill, A. Green, J. and Key, T. Moser, K. Collins, R. Doll, R. Gonzalez, C. A. and Lee, N. Ory, H. W. Peterson, H. B. Wingo, P. A. and Martin, N. Pardthaisong, T. Silpisornkosol, S. Theetranont, C. Boosiri, B. Chutivongse, S. Jimakorn, P. Virutamasen, P. Wongsrichanalai, C. Tjonneland, A. Titus-Ernstoff, L. and Byers, T. Rohan, T. Mosgaard, B. J. Yeates, D. and Freudenheim, J. L. Chang-Claude, J. Kaaks, R. Anderson, K. E. Folsom, A. Robien, K. Rossing, M. A. Thomas, D. B. and Weiss, N. S. Riboli, E. Clavel-Chapelon, F. Cramer, D. and Hankinson, S. E. Tworoger, S. S. Franceschi, S. La Vecchia, C. Magnusson, C. Riman, T. Weiderpass, E. Wolk, A. Schouten, L. J. van den Brandt, P. A. Chantarakul, N. and Koetsawang, S. Rachawat, D. Palli, D. Black, A. de Gonzalez, A. Berrington Freedman, D. M. Hartge, P. Hsing, A. W. Lacey, Jr., J. V. Hoover, R. N. Schairer, C. and Graff-Iversen, S. Selmer, R. Bain, C. J. Green, A. C. and Purdie, D. M. Siskind, V. Webb, P. M. McCann, S. E. and Hannaford, P. Kay, C. Binns, C. W. Lee, A. H. Zhang, M. and Ness, R. B. Nasca, P. Coogan, P. F. Palmer, J. R. and Rosenberg, L. Kelsey, J. Paffenbarger, R. Whittemore, A. and Katsouyanni, K. Trichopoulou, A. Trichopoulos, D. Tzonou, A. and Dabancens, A. Martinez, L. Molina, R. Salas, O. and Goodman, M. T. Lurie, G. Carney, M. E. Wilkens, L. R. and Hartman, L. Manjer, J. Olsson, H. Grisso, J. A. Morgan, M. Wheeler, J. E. Casagrande, J. Pike, M. C. Ross, R. K. and Wu, A. H. Miller, A. B. Kumle, M. Lund, E. McGowan, L. Shu, X. O. Zheng, W. Farley, T. M. M. Holck, S. and Meirik, O. Risch, H. A. Collaborative Grp Epidemiol Studie

Abstract

Background: Only about half the studies that have collected information on the relevance of women’s height and body mass index to their risk of developing ovarian cancer have published their results, and findings are inconsistent. Here, we bring together the worldwide evidence, published and unpublished, and describe these relationships. Methods and Findings: Individual data on 25,157 women with ovarian cancer and 81,311 women without ovarian cancer from 47 epidemiological studies were collected, checked, and analysed centrally. Adjusted relative risks of ovarian cancer were calculated, by height and by body mass index. Ovarian cancer risk increased significantly with height and with body mass index, except in studies using hospital controls. For other study designs, the relative risk of ovarian cancer per 5 cm increase in height was 1.07 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.09; p

Published
2012

29. Endometrial thickness in women undergoing IUI with ovarian stimulation. How thick is too thin? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Author

Weiss, N. S., van Vliet, M. N., Limpens, J., Hompes, P. G. A., Lambalk, C. B., Mochtar, M. H., van der Veen, F., Mol, B. W. J., and van Wely, M.

Subjects
*ENDOMETRIUM physiology, *FOLLICLE-stimulating hormone, *OVARIAN physiology, *INTRAUTERINE contraceptives, *GONADOTROPIN, *INFERTILITY treatment, *HETEROGENEITY
Abstract

Study Question: Is pre-ovulatory endometrial thickness (EMT) in women with unexplained subfertility undergoing IUI with ovarian stimulation (OS) associated with pregnancy chances?Summary Answer: We found no evidence for an association between EMT and pregnancy chances.What Is Known Already: It has been suggested that OS with clomiphene citrate (CC) results in a lower EMT than with gonadotrophins or aromatase inhibitors, but the clinical consequences in terms of pregnancy are unclear.Study Design, Size, Duration: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing CC, gonadotrophins or aromatase inhibitors in an IUI program reporting on EMT and pregnancy rates in women with unexplained subfertility.Participants/materials, Setting, Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the non-MEDLINE subset of PubMed from inception to 28th June 2016 and cross-checked references of relevant articles. Outcome measures were clinical pregnancy rate and mean pre-ovulatory EMT. We calculated mean differences (MD) with 95% CIs with a fixed effect model, and in case of heterogeneity with an I2 > 50% a random effect model. We performed a meta-regression analysis to determine if stimulating drugs interacted with the estimated effect of EMT.Main Results and the Role Of Chance: Our search retrieved 1563 articles of which 23 were included, totaling 3846 women. There were 17 RCTs and 6 cohort studies. The average study quality was low and there was considerable to substantial statistical heterogeneity. Seven studies provided data on EMT in relation to pregnancy. There was no evidence of a difference in EMT between women who conceived and women that did not conceive (1525 women, MDrandom: 0.51 mm, 95% CI: -0.05 to 1.07). Women treated with CC had a significantly thinner EMT than women treated with gonadotrophins (two studies, MD: -0.33, 95% CI: -0.64 to -0.01). There was no evidence of a difference in EMT when comparing CC with letrozole (five studies, MDrandom: -0.84, 95% CI: -1.97 to 0.28). The combination of CC plus gonadotrophins resulted in a slightly thinner endometrium than letrozole (nine studies, MDrandom: -0.79, 95% CI: -1.37 to -0.20). Letrozole resulted in a thinner EMT than gonadotrophins (two studies, MDrandom: -1.31, 95% CI: -2.08 to -0.53).Limitations, Reasons For Caution: The overall quality of the included studies was low to moderate. We found considerable to substantial heterogeneity in the comparisons, hampering firm conclusions.Wider Implications Of the Findings: We found no evidence for an association between EMT and pregnancy rates during IUI -OS. As a consequence, canceling IUI cycles because of a thin endometrial lining may negatively affect clinical care. Although we found some evidence for very small differences in EMT when comparing various drugs, we cannot make inferences on their effect on pregnancy chances since these differences may be coincidental.Study Funding/competing Interest(s): None.Registration Number: N/A. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

32. How long should we continue clomiphene citrate in anovulatory women?

Author

Weiss, N. S., primary, Braam, S., additional, Konig, T. E., additional, Hendriks, M. L., additional, Hamilton, C. J., additional, Smeenk, J. M. J., additional, Koks, C. A. M., additional, Kaaijk, E. M., additional, Hompes, P. G. A., additional, Lambalk, C. B., additional, van der Veen, F., additional, Mol, B. W. J., additional, and van Wely, M., additional

Published
2014
Full Text
View/download PDF

35. Alcohol, tobacco and breast cancer--collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 58,515 women with breast cancer and 95,067 women without the disease

Author

Peterson, B., Ontiveros, P., Yu, M. C., Heath, C. W., Bergkvist, L., Baines, C. J., Malone, K., Magnusson, C., Lubin, F., Kungu, A., Kay, C., Pike, M., Siskind, V., Virutamasen, P., Hermon, C., Brêmond, A., Lacaya, L. B., Bain, C., Calle, E. E., Aristizabal, N., Gatei, D., Ngelangel, C. A., Bull, D., Fentiman, I. S., Leske, M. C., Hannaford, P., Pike, M. C., Viladiu, P., Wang, D. Y., Peto, J., White, E., Weinstein, A. L., Theetranont, C., Fraser, G., La Vecchia, C., Martinez, L., Evstifeeva, T., Holck, S., Jin, F., Shearman, R., Nasca, P. C., Wang, Q. S., Stanford, J. L., Chilvers, C. E.D., Tulinius, H., Bishop, T., Coldman, A. J., Salazar, S. B., Gallagher, R. P., Peto, R., Reeves, G., Hiatt, R. A., Kunde, D., Boyle, P., Kenya, P., Molina, R., Salas, O., Negri, E., Liff, J. M., Primic-Zakelj, M., Lee, N., Doll, R., Anderson, K., Schairer, C., Band, P., Goodill, A., Goldbohm, R. A., Katsouyanni, K., Hu, J., Mao, Y., Noonan, E. A., Hislop, T. G., Meirik, O., Cuadros, A., Clavel, F., Ursin, G., Boosiri, B., Lansac, J., Schofield, F., Renaud, R., Kosmelj, K., Kolonel, L. M., Hulka, B., Berry, G., Daling, J. R., Jones, L., Mati, J. G., Hulka, B. S., McCredie, M., Spears, G. F.S., Trichopoulou, A., Schuman, L., Farley, T. M.M., Ravnihar, B., Wei, H. Y., Key, T., Skegg, D. C.G., Lewis, C., Bernstein, L., Miller, A. B., Hanson, R. L., Ross, R. K., Martin, N., Rohan, T., Collins, R., Yuan, J. M., Colditz, G., Gao, Y. T., MacLennan, R., Segala, C., Weiss, N. S., Cooper Booth, J., Andrieu, N., Banks, E., Richardson, S., van Leeuwen, F. E., Newcomb, P., Gammon, M. D., Wongsrichanalai, C., Friedman, G. D., Szklo, M., Baens, J., van den Brandt, P. A., Alexander, F. E., Wilson, H. G., Spirtas, R., Tajima, K., Gerber, M., Franceschi, S., Stare, J., Ron, E., Jelihovsky, T., Mabuchi, K., Piana, L., Wall, C., Schoenberg, J. A., Koetsawang, S., Apelo, R. A., Marchbanks, P., Stewart, W., Van Leeuven, M., Jimakorn, P., Beeson, W. L., Pardthaisong, T., Tryggvadottir, L., Zheng, W., Adami, H. O., Coates, R. J., Palet, A., Wingo, P. A., Thomas, D. B., Thomas, D., Enger, S., Trichopoulos, D., Chutivongse, S., Bulbrook, R. D., Rosero-Bixby, L., Gajalakshmi, V., de la Cruz, J. R., Hopper, J. L., Muller, A., Zhiheng, C., Beral, V., Hamajima, N., Ewertz, M., Varma, A. O., Nomura, A. M.Y., Rookus, M. A., Lee, H. P., Ebeling, K., Cuzick, J., Yang, P., Cuevas, H. R., Peterson, H. B., Izquierdo, A., Brinton, L. A., Nishan, P., Clarke, E. A., Hayward, J. L., Crossley, B., Yun, T., Kalache, A., Moller, T. R., Hutchinson, W. B., Green, J., Marubini, E., Hoover, R., Wax, Y., Modan, B., Ory, H. W., Duffy, S. W., Ranstam, J., Olsson, H., Lund, E., Gairard, B., Ferraroni, M., Paganini-Hill, A., Appleby, P., Shu, X. O., Vessey, M., Haile, R. W., Dabancens, A., Folsom, A. R., Langston, N., Talamini, R., Skegg, D., Neil, A., Chang-Claude, J., Bachelot, A., McMichael, A. J., Javier, B., Persson, I., Paul, C., Mahoney, M. C., Hirose, K., Rachawat, D., De Sanjosé, S., Longnecker, M. P., Johnson, K. C., Morabia, A., Preston, D., Levi, F., Silpisornkosol, S., Stalsberg, H., McPherson, K., Yeates, D., Lê, M. G., Chantarakul, N., Clavel-Chapelon, F., Secretariat, Cancer Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Beral V, Hamajima N, Hirose K, Rohan T, Calle EE, Heath CW, Coates RJ, Liff JM, Talamini R, Chantarakul N, Koetsawang S, Rachawat D, Morabia A, Schuman L, Stewart W, Szklo M, Bain C, Schofield F, Siskind V, Band P, Coldman AJ, Gallagher RP, Hislop TG, Yang P, Kolonel LM, Nomura AMY, Hu J, Johnson KC, Mao Y, De Sanjose S, Lee N, Marchbanks P, Ory HW, Peterson HB, Wilson HG, Wingo PA, Ebeling K, Kunde D, Nishan P, Hopper JL, Colditz G, Gajalakshmi V, Martin N, Pardthaisong T, Solpisornkosol S, Theetranont C, Boosiri B, Chutivongse S, Jimakorn P, Virutamasen P, Wongsrichanalai C, Ewertz M, Adami HO, Bergkvist L, Magnusson C, Persson I, Chang-Claude J, Paul C, Skegg DCG, Spears GFS, Boyle P, Evstifeeva T, Daling JR, Hutchinson WB, Malone K, Noonan EA, Stanford JL, Thomas DB, Weiss NS, White E, Andrieu N, Bremond A, Clavel F, Gairard B, Lansac J, Piana L, Renaud R, Izquierdo A, Viladiu P, Cuevas HR, Ontiveros P, Palet A, Salazar SB, Arsitizabal N, Cuadros A, Tryggvadottir L, Tulinius H, Bachelot A, Le MG, Peto J, Franceschi S, Lubin F, Modan B, Ron E, Wax Y, Friedman GD, Hiatt RA, Levi F, Bishop T, Kosmelj K, Primic-Zakelj M, Ravnihar B, Stare J, Beeson WL, Fraser G, Bulbrook RD, Cuzick J, Duffy SW, Fentiman IS, Hayward JL, Wang DY, McMichael AJ, McPherson K, Hanson RL, Leske MC, Mahoney MC, Nasca PC, Varma AO, Weinstein AL, Moller TR, Olsson H, Ranstam J, Goldbohm RA, van den Brandt PA, Apelo RA, Baens J, de la Cruz JR, Javier B, Lacaya LB, Ngelangel CA, La Vecchia C, Negri E, Marubini E, Ferraroni M, Gerber M, Richardson S, Segala C, Gatei D, Kenya P, Kungu A, Mati JG, Brinton LA, Hoover R, Schairer C, Spirtas R, Lee HP, Rookus MA, van Leeuwen FE, Schoenberg JA, McCredie M, Gammon MD, Clarke EA, Jones L, Neil A, Vessey M, Yeates D, Appleby P, Banks E, Bull D, Crossley B, Goodill A, Green J, Hermon C, Key T, Langston N, Lewis C, Reeves G, Collins R, Doll R, Peto R, Mabuchi K, Preston D, Hannaford P, Kay C, Rosero-Bixby L, Gao YT, Jin F, Yuan JM, Wei HY, Yun T, Zhiheng C, Berry G, Cooper Booth J, Jelihovsky T, MacLennan R, Shearman R, Wang QS, Baines CJ, Miller AB, Wall C, Lund E, Stalsberg H, Shu XO, Zheng W, Katsouyanni K, Trichopoulou A, Trichopoulos D, Dabancens A, Martinez L, Molina R, Salas O, Alexander XE, Anderson K, Folsom AR, Hulka BS, Bernstein L, Enger S, Haile RW, Paganini-Hill A, Pike MC, Ross RK, Ursin G, Yu MC, Longnecker MP, Newcomb P, Kalache A, Farley TMM, Holck S, Meirik O, and Universitat de Barcelona

Subjects
Cancer Research, medicine.medical_specialty, Epidemiology, Dones, Alcohol, tobacco, smoking, Càncer de mama, chemistry.chemical_compound, Breast cancer, Hàbit de fumar, breast cancer, Tabac, Tobacco, [SDV.SPEE] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Public Health and Epidemiology, medicine, Women, Gynecology, collaborative reanalysis, Obstetrics, business.industry, alcohol, Confounding, Smoking, medicine.disease, Tobbacco habit, Oncology, chemistry, Drinking of alcoholic beverages, [SDV.SPEE] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie, Meta-analysis, Relative risk, Consum d'alcohol, Risk assessment, business, Developed country
Abstract

COLLABORATORS (in alphabetical order of institution, study name, or location) Aichi Cancer Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan: N Hamajima, K Hirose, K Tajima; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, NY, USA: T Rohan; American Cancer Society, GA, USA: EE Calle, CW Jr Heath; Atlanta, Emory University, GA, USA: RJ Coates, JM Liff; Aviano Cancer Center, Pordenone, Italy: R Talamini; Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand: N Chantarakul, S Koetsawang, D Rachawat; Breast Tumor Collaborative Study, Johns Hopkins University, MD, USA: A Morabia, L Schuman, W Stewart, M Szklo; University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia: C Bain, F Schofield, V Siskind; British Columbia Cancer Agency, BC, Canada: P Band, AJ Coldman, RP Gallagher, TG Hislop, P Yang; Cancer Research Center, University of Hawaii, Hawaii, USA: LM Kolonel, AMY Nomura; Canadian Cancer Registries Epidemiology Research Group, Canada: J Hu, KC Johnson, Y Mao; Catalán Institut of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain: S De Sanjosé; Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, GA, USA: N Lee, P Marchbanks, HW Ory, HB Peterson, HG Wilson, PA Wingo; Central Institute of Cancer Research, Berlin, Germany: K Ebeling, D Kunde, P Nishan; Centre for Genetic Epidemiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia: JL Hopper; Channing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, USA: G Colditz for Nurses' Health Study Research Group; Chennai Cancer Institute, Madras, India: V Gajalakshmi; Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand: N Martin, T Pardthaisong, S Silpisornkosol, C Theetranont; Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand: B Boosiri, S Chutivongse, P Jimakorn, P Virutamasen, C Wongsrichanalai; Danish Cancer Society, Aalborg, Denmark: M Ewertz; Department of Medical Epidemiology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden: HO Adami, L Bergkvist, C Magnusson, I Persson; Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany: J Chang-Claude; University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand: C Paul, DCG Skegg, GFS Spears; European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy: P Boyle, T Evstifeeva; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, WA, USA: JR Daling, WB Hutchinson, K Malone, EA Noonan, JL Stanford, DB Thomas, NS Weiss, E White; French Multicentre Breast Study, INSERM, Villejuif, France: N Andrieu, A Brêmond, F Clavel, B Gairard, J Lansac, L Piana, R Renaud; Girona Cancer Registry, Girona, Spain: A Izquierdo, P Viladiu; Hospital General de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico: HR Cuevas, P Ontiveros, A Palet, SB Salazar; Hospital Universitario, Cali, Colombia: N Aristizabal, A Cuadros; Icelandic Cancer Society, Reykjavik, Iceland: L Tryggvadottir, H Tulinius; INSERM, Institut Gustave-Roussey, Villejuif, France: A Bachelot, MG Lê; Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK: J Peto; International Agency for Research in Cancer, Lyon, France: S Franceschi; Israel Chaim Sheba Medical Centre, Tel-Hashomer, Israel: F Lubin, B Modan, E Ron, Y Wax; Kaiser Permanente, CA, USA: GD Friedman, RA Hiatt; Institut universitaire de medecine sociale et preventive, Lausanne, Switzerland: F Levi; Cancer Research UK Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Leeds, UK: T Bishop; Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia: K Kosmelj, M Primic-Zakelj, B Ravnihar, J Stare; Loma Linda University, CA, USA: WL Beeson, G Fraser; Cancer Research UK Department of Mathematics, Statistics & Epidemiology, London: RD Bulbrook, J Cuzick, SW Duffy, IS Fentiman, JL Hayward, DY Wang; London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK: AJ McMichael, K McPherson; Long Island Breast Cancer Study, NY, USA: RL Hanson, MC Leske, MC Mahoney, PC Nasca, AO Varma, AL Weinstein; University Hospital, Lund, Sweden: TR Moller, H Olsson, J Ranstam; Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands: RA Goldbohm, PA van den Brandt; University of Philippines, Manila, Philippines: RA Apelo, J Baens, JR de la Cruz, B Javier, LB Lacaya, CA Ngelangel; Istituto ‘Mario Negri', Milan, Italy: C La Vecchia, E Negri; Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Divisione di Statistica Medica e Biometria, Milan, Italy: E Marubini; Istituto di Statistica Medica e Biometria, Milan, Italy: M Ferraroni; Montpellier Cancer Centre & INSERM, Montpellier, France: M Gerber, S Richardson, C Segala; Nairobi Centre for Research in Reproduction, Nairobi, Kenya: D Gatei, P Kenya, A Kungu, JG Mati; National Cancer Institute, MD, USA: LA Brinton, R Hoover, C Schairer; National Institute of Child Health & Human Development, MD, USA: R Spirtas; National University of Singapore, Singapore: HP Lee; The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: MA Rookus, FE van Leeuwen for the Netherlands Oral Contraceptives and Breast Cancer Study Group; New Jersey State Department of Health, NJ, USA: JA Schoenberg; New South Wales Cancer Council, Sydney, Australia: M McCredie; Columbia University School of Public Health, NY, USA: MD Gammon; Ontario Cancer Treatment & Research Foundation, Ontario, Canada: EA Clarke; Department of Public Health & Primary Care, Oxford, UK: L Jones, A Neil, M Vessey, D Yeates; Cancer Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Oxford, UK (Secretariat): P Appleby, E Banks, V Beral, D Bull, B Crossley, A Goodill, J Green, C Hermon, T Key, N Langston, C Lewis, G Reeves; Cancer Research UK/MRC/BHF Clinical Trial Service Unit & Epidemiological Studies Unit, Oxford, UK: R Collins, R Doll, R Peto; Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan: K Mabuchi, D Preston; Royal College of General Practitioners Oral Contraception Study, London, UK: P Hannaford, C Kay; University of Costa Rica, San Jose, Costa Rica: L Rosero-Bixby; Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China: YT Gao, F Jin, J-M Yuan; Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research, Shanghai, China: HY Wei, T Yun, C Zhiheng; Department of Public Health, Sydney, Australia: G Berry, J Cooper Booth, T Jelihovsky, R MacLennan, R Shearman; Tianjin Cancer Institute, Tianjin, China: Q-S Wang; Department of Public Health Sciences, Toronto, Canada: CJ Baines, AB Miller, C Wall; Tromso University, Tromso, Norway: E Lund, H Stalsberg; Vanderbilt University, TN, USA: XO Shu, W Zheng; University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece: K Katsouyanni, A Trichopoulou, D Trichopoulos; University of Chile, Santiago, Chile: A Dabancens, L Martinez, R Molina, O Salas; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK: FE Alexander; University of Minnesota School of Public Health, MN, USA: K Anderson, AR Folsom on behalf of the Iowa Women's Health Study; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Public Health, NC, USA: BS Hulka; University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK: CED Chilvers; University of Southern California, LA, USA: L Bernstein, S Enger, RW Haile, A Paganini-Hill, MC Pike, RK Ross, G Ursin, MC Yu; University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center, WI, USA: MP Longnecker, P Newcomb for the 4 State Study; Vasteras, Sweden: L Bergkvist; World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland: A Kalache; World Health Organisation, UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Geneva, Switzerland: TMM Farley, S Holck, O Meirik. Analysis and writing committee: Beral V, Bull D, Doll R, Peto R, Reeves G Steering committee: Skegg D (Chairman), Colditz G, Hulka B, La Vecchia C, Magnusson C, Muller A, Peterson B, Pike M, Thomas D, Van Leeuven M.; International audience; Alcohol and tobacco consumption are closely correlated and published results on their association with breast cancer have not always allowed adequately for confounding between these exposures. Over 80% of the relevant information worldwide on alcohol and tobacco consumption and breast cancer were collated, checked and analysed centrally. Analyses included 58,515 women with invasive breast cancer and 95,067 controls from 53 studies. Relative risks of breast cancer were estimated, after stratifying by study, age, parity and, where appropriate, women's age when their first child was born and consumption of alcohol and tobacco. The average consumption of alcohol reported by controls from developed countries was 6.0 g per day, i.e. about half a unit/drink of alcohol per day, and was greater in ever-smokers than never-smokers, (8.4 g per day and 5.0 g per day, respectively). Compared with women who reported drinking no alcohol, the relative risk of breast cancer was 1.32 (1.19-1.45, P/=45 g per day alcohol. The relative risk of breast cancer increased by 7.1% (95% CI 5.5-8.7%; P

Published
2002
Full Text
View/download PDF

36. Ovarian Cancer and Body Size : Individual Participant Meta-Analysis Including 25,157 Women with Ovarian Cancer from 47 Epidemiological Studies

Author

Beral, V., Hermon, C., Peto, R., Reeves, G., Brinton, L., Marchbanks, P., Negri, E., Ness, R., Peeters, P. H. M., Vessey, M., Calle, E. E., Gapstur, S. M., Patel, A. V., Dal Maso, L., Talamini, R., Chetrit, A., Hirsh-Yechezkel, G., Lubin, F., Sadetzki, S., Allen, N., Bull, D., Callaghan, K., Crossley, B., Gaitskell, K., Goodill, A., Green, J., Key, T., Moser, K., Collins, R., Doll, R., Gonzalez, C. A., Lee, N., Ory, H. W., Peterson, H. B., Wingo, P. A., Martin, N., Pardthaisong, T., Silpisornkosol, S., Theetranont, C., Boosiri, B., Chutivongse, S., Jimakorn, P., Virutamasen, P., Wongsrichanalai, C., Tjonneland, A., Titus-Ernstoff, L., Byers, T., Rohan, T., Mosgaard, B. J., Yeates, D., Freudenheim, J. L., Chang-Claude, J., Kaaks, R., Anderson, K. E., Folsom, A., Robien, K., Rossing, M. A., Thomas, D. B., Weiss, N. S., Riboli, E., Clavel-Chapelon, F., Cramer, D., Hankinson, S. E., Tworoger, S. S., Franceschi, S., La Vecchia, C., Magnusson, C., Riman, T., Weiderpass, E., Wolk, A., Schouten, L. J., van den Brandt, P. A., Chantarakul, N., Koetsawang, S., Rachawat, D., Palli, D., Black, A., de Gonzalez, A. Berrington, Freedman, D. M., Hartge, P., Hsing, A. W., Lacey, J. V., Jr., Hoover, R. N., Schairer, C., Graff-Iversen, S., Selmer, R., Bain, C. J., Green, A. C., Purdie, D. M., Siskind, V., Webb, P. M., McCann, S. E., Hannaford, P., Kay, C., Binns, C. W., Lee, A. H., Zhang, M., Ness, R. B., Nasca, P., Coogan, P. F., Palmer, J. R., Rosenberg, L., Kelsey, J., Paffenbarger, R., Whittemore, A., Katsouyanni, K., Trichopoulou, A., Trichopoulos, D., Tzonou, A., Dabancens, A., Martinez, L., Molina, R., Salas, O., Goodman, M. T., Lurie, G., Carney, M. E., Wilkens, L. R., Hartman, L., Manjer, J., Olsson, H., Grisso, J. A., Morgan, M., Wheeler, J. E., Casagrande, J., Pike, M. C., Ross, R. K., Wu, A. H., Miller, A. B., Kumle, M., Lund, E., McGowan, L., Shu, X. O., Zheng, W., Farley, T. M. M., Holck, S., Meirik, O., Risch, H. A., Beral, V., Hermon, C., Peto, R., Reeves, G., Brinton, L., Marchbanks, P., Negri, E., Ness, R., Peeters, P. H. M., Vessey, M., Calle, E. E., Gapstur, S. M., Patel, A. V., Dal Maso, L., Talamini, R., Chetrit, A., Hirsh-Yechezkel, G., Lubin, F., Sadetzki, S., Allen, N., Bull, D., Callaghan, K., Crossley, B., Gaitskell, K., Goodill, A., Green, J., Key, T., Moser, K., Collins, R., Doll, R., Gonzalez, C. A., Lee, N., Ory, H. W., Peterson, H. B., Wingo, P. A., Martin, N., Pardthaisong, T., Silpisornkosol, S., Theetranont, C., Boosiri, B., Chutivongse, S., Jimakorn, P., Virutamasen, P., Wongsrichanalai, C., Tjonneland, A., Titus-Ernstoff, L., Byers, T., Rohan, T., Mosgaard, B. J., Yeates, D., Freudenheim, J. L., Chang-Claude, J., Kaaks, R., Anderson, K. E., Folsom, A., Robien, K., Rossing, M. A., Thomas, D. B., Weiss, N. S., Riboli, E., Clavel-Chapelon, F., Cramer, D., Hankinson, S. E., Tworoger, S. S., Franceschi, S., La Vecchia, C., Magnusson, C., Riman, T., Weiderpass, E., Wolk, A., Schouten, L. J., van den Brandt, P. A., Chantarakul, N., Koetsawang, S., Rachawat, D., Palli, D., Black, A., de Gonzalez, A. Berrington, Freedman, D. M., Hartge, P., Hsing, A. W., Lacey, J. V., Jr., Hoover, R. N., Schairer, C., Graff-Iversen, S., Selmer, R., Bain, C. J., Green, A. C., Purdie, D. M., Siskind, V., Webb, P. M., McCann, S. E., Hannaford, P., Kay, C., Binns, C. W., Lee, A. H., Zhang, M., Ness, R. B., Nasca, P., Coogan, P. F., Palmer, J. R., Rosenberg, L., Kelsey, J., Paffenbarger, R., Whittemore, A., Katsouyanni, K., Trichopoulou, A., Trichopoulos, D., Tzonou, A., Dabancens, A., Martinez, L., Molina, R., Salas, O., Goodman, M. T., Lurie, G., Carney, M. E., Wilkens, L. R., Hartman, L., Manjer, J., Olsson, H., Grisso, J. A., Morgan, M., Wheeler, J. E., Casagrande, J., Pike, M. C., Ross, R. K., Wu, A. H., Miller, A. B., Kumle, M., Lund, E., McGowan, L., Shu, X. O., Zheng, W., Farley, T. M. M., Holck, S., Meirik, O., and Risch, H. A.

Abstract

Background: Only about half the studies that have collected information on the relevance of women's height and body mass index to their risk of developing ovarian cancer have published their results, and findings are inconsistent. Here, we bring together the worldwide evidence, published and unpublished, and describe these relationships. Methods and Findings: Individual data on 25,157 women with ovarian cancer and 81,311 women without ovarian cancer from 47 epidemiological studies were collected, checked, and analysed centrally. Adjusted relative risks of ovarian cancer were calculated, by height and by body mass index. Ovarian cancer risk increased significantly with height and with body mass index, except in studies using hospital controls. For other study designs, the relative risk of ovarian cancer per 5 cm increase in height was 1.07 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.09; p<0.001); this relationship did not vary significantly by women's age, year of birth, education, age at menarche, parity, menopausal status, smoking, alcohol consumption, having had a hysterectomy, having first degree relatives with ovarian or breast cancer, use of oral contraceptives, or use of menopausal hormone therapy. For body mass index, there was significant heterogeneity (p<0.001) in the findings between ever-users and never-users of menopausal hormone therapy, but not by the 11 other factors listed above. The relative risk for ovarian cancer per 5 kg/m(2) increase in body mass index was 1.10 (95% CI, 1.07-1.13; p<0.001) in never-users and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.99; p = 0.02) in ever-users of hormone therapy. Conclusions: Ovarian cancer is associated with height and, among never-users of hormone therapy, with body mass index. In high-income countries, both height and body mass index have been increasing in birth cohorts now developing the disease. If all other relevant factors had remained constant, then these increases in height and weight would be associated with

Published
2012
Full Text
View/download PDF

37. Anti-HPV-E7 seropositivity and risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in a high-risk population in China

Author

He, Z., primary, Xu, Z., additional, Hang, D., additional, Guo, F., additional, Abliz, A., additional, Weiss, N. S., additional, Xi, L., additional, Liu, F., additional, Ning, T., additional, Pan, Y., additional, Guo, C., additional, Liang, Y., additional, Lu, C., additional, Zhang, L., additional, Cai, H., additional, and Ke, Y., additional

Published
2013
Full Text
View/download PDF

42. Safety of MF59-Adjuvanted Influenza Vaccination in the Elderly: Results of a Comparative Study of MF59-Adjuvanted Vaccine Versus Nonadjuvanted Influenza Vaccine in Northern Italy

Author

Villa, M., primary, Black, S., additional, Groth, N., additional, Rothman, K. J., additional, Apolone, G., additional, Weiss, N. S., additional, Aquino, I., additional, Boldori, L., additional, Caramaschi, F., additional, Gattinoni, A., additional, Malchiodi, G., additional, Crucitti, A., additional, Della Cioppa, G., additional, Scarpini, E., additional, Mavilio, D., additional, and Mannino, S., additional

Published
2013
Full Text
View/download PDF

49. Myocardial infarction and stroke associated with diuretic based two drug antihypertensive regimens: population based case-control study

Author

Boger-Megiddo, I., primary, Heckbert, S. R, additional, Weiss, N. S, additional, McKnight, B., additional, Furberg, C. D, additional, Wiggins, K. L, additional, Delaney, J. A C, additional, Siscovick, D. S, additional, Larson, E. B, additional, Lemaitre, R. N, additional, Smith, N. L, additional, Rice, K. M, additional, Glazer, N. L, additional, and Psaty, B. M, additional

Published
2010
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results