Search

Background: Elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) is the most common inherited dyslipidemia that is independently and causally associated with increased atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. However, data from diverse populations with ASCVD are lacking., Objective: To evaluate Lp(a) levels in a diverse, contemporary United States (US) population with ASCVD, stratified by race, ethnicity, and sex., Methods: Lp(a)HERITAGE (NCT03887520) was a multicenter study that estimated the prevalence of elevated Lp(a) in adults (18-80 years) with ASCVD. US participants with Lp(a) measured in nmol/L pre- or post-enrollment were included in this subanalysis. This study was descriptive; therefore, no statistical comparisons were made., Results: Of all US participants, 14% had an Lp(a) measurement pre-enrollment. This subanalysis included 7679 US participants with Lp(a) measurements in nmol/L (80.5% White; 66.4% male; mean age 63.8 years [standard deviation ± 9.7]). Median Lp(a) was >2.5-fold higher in Black participants (132.0 nmol/L; IQR, 57.1-239.6) vs the overall population (52.1 nmol/L; IQR, 15.7-167.8), and higher in females compared with males (69.4 nmol/L; IQR, 20.1-194.7 vs 45.6 nmol/L; IQR, 14.0-152.6, respectively). Lp(a) levels ≥125 nmol/L were more prevalent among Black (52.0%) and female (38.9%) participants vs the overall population (33.3%)., Conclusion: In US Lp(a)HERITAGE participants, only 14% had an Lp(a) measurement pre-enrollment, despite having ASCVD. One-third of participants demonstrated Lp(a) levels ≥125 nmol/L, the threshold for high ASCVD risk, which was higher among Black (1/2) and female (2/5) participants, suggesting a greater need for Lp(a) testing in these groups to inform ASCVD risk mitigation., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a driver of residual cardiovascular risk. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) decrease Lp(a) with significant heterogeneity in response. We investigated contributors to the heterogeneous response., Methods: CHOlesterol Reduction and Residual Risk in Diabetes (CHORD) was a prospective study examining lipid lowering in participants with a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) >100 mg/dL with and without diabetes (DM) on lipid lowering therapy (LLT) for 30-days with evolocumab 140 mg every 14 days combined with either atorvastatin 80 mg or ezetimibe 10 mg daily. Lp(a) level was measured by immunoturbidometry, and the apolipoprotein (a) [apo(a)] isoform size was measured by denaturing agarose gel electrophoresis and western blotting. We examined the change in Lp(a) levels from baseline to 30 days., Results: Among 150 participants (mean age 50 years, 58% female, 50% non-White, 17% Hispanic, 50% DM), median (interquartile range) Lp(a) was 27.5 (8-75) mg/dL at baseline and 23 (3-68) mg/dL at 30 days, leading to a 10% (0-36) median reduction (P < 0.001). Among 73 (49%) participants with Lp(a) ≥30 mg/dL at baseline, there was a 15% (3-25) median reduction in Lp(a) (P < 0.001). While baseline Lp(a) level was not correlated with change in Lp(a) (r = 0.04, P = 0.59), apo(a) size directly correlated with Lp(a) reduction (P < 0.001). After adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, DM, and type of LLT, apo(a) size remained positively associated with a reduction in Lp(a) (Beta 0.95, 95% confidence interval, 0.93-0.97, P < 0.001)., Conclusion: Our data demonstrate variation in Lp(a) reduction with potent LLT. Change in Lp(a) was strongly associated with apo(a) isoform size., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Compelling evidence supports a causal role for lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) in cardiovascular disease. No pharmacotherapies directly targeting Lp(a) are currently available for clinical use. Here we report the discovery and development of olpasiran, a first-in-class, synthetic, double-stranded, N-acetylgalactosamine-conjugated small interfering RNA (siRNA) designed to directly inhibit LPA messenger RNA translation in hepatocytes and potently reduce plasma Lp(a) concentration. Olpasiran reduced Lp(a) concentrations in transgenic mice and cynomolgus monkeys in a dose-responsive manner, achieving up to over 80% reduction from baseline for 5-8 weeks after administration of a single dose. In a phase 1 dose-escalation trial of olpasiran (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03626662 ), the primary outcome was safety and tolerability, and the secondary outcomes were the change in Lp(a) concentrations and olpasiran pharmacokinetic parameters. Participants tolerated single doses of olpasiran well and experienced a 71-97% reduction in Lp(a) concentration with effects persisting for several months after administration of doses of 9 mg or higher. Serum concentrations of olpasiran increased approximately dose proportionally. Collectively, these results validate the approach of using hepatocyte-targeted siRNA to potently lower Lp(a) in individuals with elevated plasma Lp(a) concentration., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), the most common cause of death in T2D. Despite improved risk factor control, however, adults with T2D continue to experience substantial excess CVD risk. Until recently, however, improved glycemic control has not been associated with robust macrovascular benefit. The advent of 2 new classes of antihyperglycemic agents, the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and their respective large cardiovascular outcome trials, has led to a paradigm shift in how cardiologists and heath care practitioners conceptualize T2D treatment. Herein, the authors review the recent trial evidence, the potential mechanisms of action of the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, safety concerns, and their use for the primary prevention of CVD as well as in diabetic patients with impaired renal function and heart failure., (Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), the most common cause of death in T2D. Yet, <50% of U.S. adults with T2D meet recommended guidelines for CVD prevention. The burden of T2D is increasing: by 2050, approximately 1 in 3 U.S. individuals may have T2D, and patients with T2D will comprise an increasingly large proportion of the CVD population. The authors believe it is imperative that we expand the use of therapies proven to reduce CVD risk in patients with T2D. The authors summarize evidence and guidelines for lifestyle (exercise, nutrition, and weight management) and CVD risk factor (blood pressure, cholesterol and blood lipids, glycemic control, and the use of aspirin) management for the prevention of CVD among patients with T2D. The authors believe appropriate lifestyle and CVD risk factor management has the potential to significantly reduce the burden of CVD among patients with T2D., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Diabetes mellitus (diabetes) is associated with significantly increased risk of peripheral vascular disease. Diabetes is classified as a coronary heart disease (CHD) risk equivalent, but it is unknown whether diabetes is a CHD risk equivalent for peripheral vascular disease. The objective was to evaluate the odds of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) or carotid artery stenosis (CAS) among participants with diabetes, CHD, or both, compared with participants without diabetes or CHD, in a nationwide vascular screening database. We hypothesized that diabetes and CHD would confer similar odds of PAD and CAS., Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of all eligible Life Line Screening Inc participants age 30 to 90 years with ankle brachial indices for PAD (ankle brachial index <0.9 in either leg) and carotid artery duplex ultrasonographic imaging for CAS (internal CAS ≥50%) was performed (N=3,522,890)., Results: Diabetes and CHD were present in 372,330 (10.7%) and 182,760 (5.8%) of participants, respectively; PAD and CAS were present in 155,000 (4.4%) and 130,347 (3.7%) of participants. After multivariable adjustment, PAD odds were 1.56 (95% CI 1.54-1.59) and 1.69 (95% CI 1.65-1.73) for participants with diabetes or CHD, respectively. Participants with both diabetes and CHD had 2.75-fold increased odds of PAD (95% CI 2.66-2.85). Findings were similar for CAS; compared with no diabetes or CHD, CAS odds increased for participants with diabetes alone (1.53, 95% CI 1.50-1.56), CHD alone (1.72, 95% CI 1.68-1.76), and both diabetes and CHD (2.57, 95% CI 2.49-2.66). Findings were consistent for women and men., Conclusion: In a large database of more than 3.5 million self-referred participants, diabetes was a CHD risk equivalent for PAD and CAS, and participants with comorbid diabetes and CHD had an especially robust association with PAD and CAS. Counseling regarding screening and prevention of peripheral vascular disease may be useful for patients with diabetes., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The global obesity epidemic and its impact on cardiovascular outcomes is a topic of ongoing debate and investigation in the cardiology community. It is well known that obesity is associated with multiple cardiovascular risk factors. Although life-style changes are the first line of therapy, they are often insufficient in achieving weight loss goals. Liraglutide, naltrexone/bupropion, and phentermine/topiramate are new agents that have been recently approved to treat obesity, but their effects on cardiovascular risk factors and outcomes are not well described. This review summarizes data currently available for these novel agents regarding drug safety, effects on major cardiovascular risk factors, impact on cardiovascular outcomes, outcomes research that is currently in progress, and areas of uncertainty. Given the impact of obesity on cardiovascular health, there is a pressing clinical need to understand the effects of these agents beyond weight loss alone., (Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Testosterone replacement therapy is recommended for men with clinical androgen deficiency with decades of evidence supporting its use for treatment of sexual, physical, and psychological consequences of male hypogonadism. In this updated review, the authors discuss the implications of testosterone deficiency and conflicting evidence regarding testosterone replacement therapy and its effects on the cardiovascular system. Based on mounting evidence, the authors conclude that testosterone therapy can be safely considered in men with appropriately diagnosed clinical androgen deficiency and concurrent cardiovascular risk factors and even manifest cardiovascular disease after a thorough discussion of potential risks and with guideline-recommended safety monitoring., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Patients with elevated triglycerides (TG) may be at a higher risk for cardiovascular (CV) disease. Omega-3 fatty acids (OM3FAs), particularly the long-chain fatty acids eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), effectively reduce TG and thus may impact CV outcomes; however, clinical data have been inconsistent. This review discusses the efficacy, safety, and key considerations of currently approved prescription OM3FA products in patients with elevated TG with or without concomitant elevations in other atherogenic parameters. Currently, 6 prescription OM3FA formulations are approved in the United States: omega-3-acid ethyl esters (Lovaza, Omtryg, and 2 generic formulations), omega-3-carboxylic acids (Epanova), which contain both EPA and DHA, and icosapent ethyl (Vascepa), which is an EPA-only formulation. All prescription OM3FA products effectively lower TG, with the magnitude of TG reduction affected by baseline TG level. Products that contain DHA can raise levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, which is of particular concern in patients with atherosclerosis; Vascepa, however, does not raise these levels and therefore provides these patients with another option. Long-term outcomes trials for Vascepa (ongoing) and Epanova (planned) will help clarify the potential CV benefits in patients with persistent hypertriglyceridemia despite statin therapy.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between diabetes and different phenotypes of peripheral vascular disease (lower extremity peripheral artery disease [PAD], carotid artery stenosis [CAS], and abdominal aortic aneurysm [AAA])., Research Design and Methods: Prevalence of vascular disease was evaluated in 3,696,778 participants of the Life Line Screening survey between 2003 and 2008. PAD was defined as ankle-brachial pressure index <0.90 or prior revascularization, CAS as ≥50% stenosis or prior revascularization, and AAA as infrarenal aortic diameter ≥3 cm or prior repair. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were assessed using logistic regression modeling., Results: Diabetes mellitus was present in 10.8% of participants (n = 399,884). Prevalence of PAD, CAS, and AAA was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) in participants with compared with those without diabetes. After multivariate adjustment for baseline demographics and clinical risk factors, a significant interaction existed between diabetes and vascular disease phenotype (P < 0.0001). Diabetes was associated with increased odds of PAD (OR 1.42 [95% CI 1.41-1.4]; P < 0.0001) and CAS (1.45 [1.43-1.47]; P < 0.0001) but decreased odds of AAA (0.86 [0.84-0.88]; P < 0.0001). The strength of association increased with increasing severity of disease in each vascular phenotype, and this association persisted in the population with asymptomatic vascular disease., Conclusions: In a large population-based study, the association between diabetes and vascular disease differed according to vascular phenotype. Future studies exploring the mechanism for these vascular-specific differences are needed., (© 2014 by the American Diabetes Association.)

Home blood pressure (BP) monitoring may enhance assessment of BP control. In this 16-week study, men and women 70 years or older with systolic BP between 150 and 200 mm Hg were randomized to receive valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (V/HCTZ) 160/12.5 mg (n = 128), HCTZ 12.5 mg (n = 128), or V 160 mg (n = 128) for 4 weeks. Participants whose BP was 140/90 mm Hg or higher at weeks 4, 8, or 12 were uptitrated to a maximum of V/HCTZ 320/25 mg. Participants were evaluated by home BP monitoring using an automated device weekly before taking daily study medication (n = 301). Baseline BP ± SD for clinic (165.5 ± 11.8/85.1 ± 9.5 mm Hg) was approximately 3/1 mm Hg greater than home readings (162.5 ± 15.8/84.3 ± 10.2 mm Hg). Reductions in BP ± SEM at week 4 were similar for clinic (12.6 ± 1.0/4.7 ± 0.5 mm Hg) and home (10.9 ± 1.1/3.8 ± 0.5 mm Hg) readings (P = .25/P = .23; clinic versus home); differences between V/HCTZ and HCTZ or V were also similar for both home and clinic readings and results by either technique correlated significantly (P < .0001). Home BP measurements confirm that treatment initiated with V/HCTZ versus monotherapy resulted in greater antihypertensive efficacy. Home BP monitoring, if done with proper technique, provides a reliable indicator of BP control in elderly patients and may help guide drug dosing and titration., (Copyright © 2012 American Society of Hypertension. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Renin profiling has been proposed as a method to guide antihypertensive drug selection. This prespecified post-hoc analysis examined the influence of baseline plasma renin activity (PRA) on blood pressure (BP) responses., Methods: A 16-week, randomized, double-blind, prompted-titration trial evaluated initial valsartan (V)/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) combination therapy versus initial HCTZ or V monotherapy in individuals aged ≥ 70 years with systolic hypertension. Sitting PRA was measured at baseline, Week 4, and Week 16. Subjects were stratified into 2 groups for analysis: low renin (baseline PRA < 0.65 ng/mL/h) or normal-high renin (baseline PRA ≥ 0.65 ng/mL/h)., Results: PRA data were available in 322/384 subjects: 178 had low PRA and 144 had normal-high PRA. At Week 4, V/HCTZ was more effective than HCTZ or V at reducing mean sitting systolic BP (MSSBP), independent of baseline PRA, with reductions of -16.9, -12.6, and -9.5 mmHg, respectively, in low-renin subjects and -19.4, -11.5, and -8.6 mmHg in normal-high renin subjects. Baseline PRA was similar in responders (subjects not uptitrated at Week 4) and nonresponders (subjects uptitrated at Week 4). In responders, the reactive rise in PRA at Week 4 was related to change in MSSBP, with the greatest increases in PRA observed in the V/HCTZ group. Higher baseline PRA was associated with a greater reactive rise in PRA., Conclusions: Baseline PRA is not a useful guide to the BP responses of initial combination V/HCTZ in elderly individuals with systolic hypertension.

Almost one third of annual worldwide mortality is attributed to cardiovascular disease (CVD), making it the leading cause of global death. Dyslipidemia is a well-established risk factor for CVD and plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Statins, which inhibit 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase and lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, have emerged as the most effective therapy to date against atherothrombotic CVD. Although their role in secondary prevention of CVD is undisputed, it remains a topic for debate as to how widely they should be used for primary prevention. The Framingham Risk Score and the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines are the cornerstones for the current guidelines for primary prevention statin therapy. Although these guidelines serve as help to evaluate cardiovascular risk and effectively identify many patients who will benefit from statin therapy, there is a growing population of "intermediate-risk" patients who may be undertreated. Additional noninvasive tests may complement the traditional risk scores, potentially expanding the indications for statins.

Blood pressure (BP) control rates in the United States remain low despite the availability of a wide array of treatment options. High-risk populations, including women, black individuals, and obese patients are even less likely to achieve BP targets than the general population. Uncontrolled BP can lead to serious consequences. Therefore, additional effective and well-tolerated treatment strategies are necessary, particularly for these difficult-to-treat populations. The majority of patients require 2 or more pharmacologic agents to achieve BP control. In patients with stage 2 hypertension, current guidelines recommend rational antihypertensive combinations as initial therapy. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays an important role in development of hypertension and progression, and the use of RAAS inhibitors has shown BP-lowering effectiveness and excellent tolerability across a continuum of patient types. Agents that block the RAAS form a reasonable foundation for combination therapy. In this article, we review data from studies of valsartan-based antihypertensive combinations in stage 2 hypertension, with a focus on women, black individuals, and obese patients.

This 16-week trial investigated the efficacy and safety of single-pill valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) vs. the individual components in patients 70 years and older with systolic hypertension. Patients were randomized to valsartan/HCTZ 160/12.5 mg (n=128), HCTZ 12.5 mg (n=128), or valsartan 160 mg (n=128) for 4 weeks. Patients whose blood pressure (BP) was ≥140/90 mm Hg at weeks 4, 8, or 12 were up-titrated to a maximum of valsartan/HCTZ 320/25 mg. Week 4 systolic BP reduction (primary efficacy outcome) was greater with valsartan/HCTZ than valsartan (-17.3 mm Hg vs. -8.6 mm Hg, P <.0001) but only marginally greater than HCTZ (-13.6 mm Hg, P =.096). Median time to BP control was shorter with valsartan/HCTZ (4 weeks) vs HCTZ (8 weeks, P<.05) or valsartan (12 weeks, P<.0001). Thiazide monotherapy was more effective than angiotensin receptor blocker monotherapy (by about 5 mm Hg), but greater antihypertensive efficacy was achieved by initiating treatment with combination valsartan/HCTZ in the elderly., (© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Stage 2 hypertension often requires combination antihypertensive therapy. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is a useful tool for studying antihypertensive drugs and their combinations., Objective: This multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, prompted-titration study of patients of at least 70 years of age with systolic hypertension compared the efficacy of valsartan, hydrochlorothiazide, and their combination on ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) reduction., Methods: After a 3-14-day washout, patients with systolic blood pressure of 150-200 mmHg were randomized (1 : 1 : 1) to initially receive once-daily valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide 160/12.5 mg combination therapy, hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg monotherapy, or valsartan 160 mg monotherapy. Prompted uptitration of patients in whom BP was more than or equal to 140/90 mmHg was performed after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment. ABPM was performed at baseline and weeks 4 and 16 (study end)., Results: In this ABPM substudy (n=108), initiation of treatment with valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide lowered ABP more effectively than either monotherapy throughout the daytime, night-time, and 24-h monitoring periods, as well as during the last 4 and 6-h dosing periods. Twenty-four-hour ABP was reduced from 141.1/76.5 mmHg at baseline to 125.8/69.2 mmHg at week 4 (primary time point) with valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide compared with reductions from 142.2/78.7 to 139.1/77.5 mmHg with hydrochlorothiazide and 142.2/78.3 to 136.4/75.1 mmHg with valsartan (all P<0.01 in favor of combination therapy). In the overall study, tolerability was similar among the three treatment groups., Conclusion: In elderly hypertensives, starting combination therapy with valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide provides more effective 24-h blood pressure control than the monotherapy components, with few therapy-related side-effects.

Opinion Statement: The pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease is a complex and dynamic process. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is a potent and powerful mediator in the homeostasis of the cardiovascular and renal systems. RAAS blockade via angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) has been consistently proven to be an effective and safe strategy for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients across a wide spectrum of risk. Although the beneficial effects of RAAS blockade may be due to its effects on central and peripheral blood pressure, there are many additional mechanisms to consider that may contribute additional protection. While a combination of ACE inhibitors and ARBs has not yielded significantly positive results, the newer class of direct renin inhibitors (DRIs) may offer a novel and effective strategy for monotherapy as well as in combination.

There is now clear evidence that reducing blood pressure (BP) with a broad range of agents, including angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers, improves cardiovascular and renal outcomes. There is also evidence suggesting that these drugs have beneficial effects that are independent of BP lowering. Aliskiren is a direct renin inhibitor that interrupts the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) at its rate-limiting step. Unlike angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers, aliskiren produces a sustained reduction in plasma renin activity and reduces plasma levels of angiotensin II and aldosterone. Preclinical data and clinical trials in high-risk patients using surrogate markers increasingly suggest that aliskiren can reduce the progression of end-organ damage beyond that afforded by BP control. With its unique mechanism of action, combining aliskiren with another RAAS-blocking agent that has a different mechanism of action may provide more comprehensive blockade of the RAAS, potentially conferring additional clinical benefits. Evaluation of these end-organ effects in humans is underway in clinical trials designed to assess the effects of aliskiren alone and in combination with other antihypertensive agents on cardiovascular and renal outcomes.

Chronic angina pectoris affects millions of patients every year. During the past 2 decades, advances in medical therapy have led to substantial reductions in the symptoms of angina. Nonetheless, many patients continue to experience persistent angina that causes debilitating symptoms and lifestyle changes. Moreover, many current therapeutic agents cause side effects that can induce substantial morbidity on their own. In major clinical trials, the drug ranolazine has been shown to bring symptomatic relief to large numbers of patients who have chronic angina. Herein, we review the physiology of the sodium channel; the pharmacology of ranolazine; clinical trials that support use of the drug; recent evidence about ranolazine's therapeutic effect on diastolic heart failure, glycemic control, and atrial fibrillation and other arrhythmias; officially approved clinical indications; and avenues of future study.

Hypertension commonly clusters with other cardiovascular risk factors, giving rise to the concept that hypertension is a multifaceted disease that potentially shares common pathogenic pathways with other risk factors. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system has a central role in the shared mechanisms of hypertension and cardiovascular disease, primarily through angiotensin II. Increased levels of angiotensin II disrupt the balance of vasoactive substances and growth factors that regulate endothelial structure and function, and inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker helps restore this equilibrium. Some pathogenic mechanisms may also be favorably affected by calcium channel blockade. While the relative contribution of pleiotropic effects to clinical benefit is difficult to quantify, based on recent data it is reasonable to consider using newer antihypertensive agents in selected high-risk patients to realize the benefits that may derive from interfering with pathogenic mechanisms of disease.

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States, and the obesity epidemic combined with aging of the population seems destined to increase the burden of this disease. Traditional cardiovascular risk assessment accounts for <50% of the variability in risk in the United States. Therefore, better and more effective identification of persons at high cardiovascular risk is needed. Our understanding of atherosclerosis has shifted from a focal disease whose hallmark is symptoms caused by a severe stenosis to a systemic disease characterized by endothelial dysfunction (ED) and plaque inflammation, with the potential for rupture and thrombosis mainly in those with subcritical stenosis. Under the new paradigm, clinicians require updated strategies to better assess the quality of arterial plaque. Effective tools for primary and secondary prevention of heart attack and stroke include intensive lifestyle modification, blood pressure reduction, and lipid-modifying therapies. These interventions are now understood to decrease plaque inflammation and thereby promote plaque stability. Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2) (Lp-PLA(2)) appears to be a specific marker of plaque inflammation that may play a direct role in the formation of rupture-prone plaque. In contrast, traditional risk factors, lipid measurement, and most vascular imaging modalities do not directly assess the acute ischemic potential in the arterial wall. Measuring Lp-PLA(2) levels in human serum or plasma is noninvasive and relatively inexpensive. Lp-PLA(2) may provide additional clinically relevant information that shows which patients have a high level of atherosclerotic disease activity as manifested by vascular inflammation, ED, and increased risk for progression toward rupture-prone plaque.

During the past 25 years, the role of traditional "risk factors" in the genesis of atherosclerotic vascular disease has been convincingly validated. The impact of elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, hypertension, type II diabetes, and metabolic syndrome are now well accepted. However, until recently, there was guilt by association without a clear understanding of the manner in which the crime was committed. It is now acknowledged that the presence of multiple risk factors can increase the likelihood of an ischemic event. This has become a great concern, given the very high prevalence of patients who fall into this category. In light of this information, the mandate for appropriate guideline-driven therapy has become even stronger, and we must consider the use of multiple medications to effectively neutralize this risk.

Thymopoietin32--36 (TP5) is a synthetic pentapeptide that has the biological activity of its parent molecule, the 49 amino acid thymic hormone thymopoietin. Tritiated thymopoietin32--36 (3 /-TP5) was prepared by reductive tritiation of dibromotyrosyl-TP5. The stability of 3 H-TP5 in human plasma was studied by analyzing samples by thin-layer chromatography at different time points and quantitating the radioactivity associated with TP5 (Arg-Lys-Asp-Val-Tyr) and its tyrosyl-containing breakdown products (Lys-Asp-Val-Tyr, Asp-Val-Tyr, Val-Tyr, Tyr). In plasma (but not in saline) the pentapeptide was rapidly degraded (apparent t1/2 approximately 30 seconds) with the corresponding appearance of radioactivity associated with the other tyrosyl-containing reference compounds. These data imply that the pentapeptide, which is active in vivo, may rapidly trigger changes in responsive cells; sustained circulating levels may not be required for activity.

The disposition of radioactivity following oral administration of 14C-norgestimate was compared to that following administration of the drug in combination with 3H-ethinyl estradiol in humans. Seven normal, healthy female subjects were each administered one capsule orally containing 14C-norgestimate either alone (74.4 muCi, 0.50 mg) or in combination (73.5 muCi, 0.49 mg) with 3H-ethinyl estradiol (103 muCi, 0.14 mg) in polyethylene glycol 400. Peak levels of radioactivity due to carbon-14 and tritium in plasma occurred within 2 hr after drug administration, followed by distribution and elimination phases. The mean apparent elimination half-life and mean cumulative elimination of radioactivity in the urine and feces following 14C-norgestimate administration were not significantly different than those following administration of the combination dose. Approximately 50% of the administered radioactivity due to carbon-14 was excreted in the urine following administration of 14C-norgestimate both in the presence and absence of coadministered 3H-ethinyl estradiol.

This review compares and contrasts the preclinical pharmacology of bromperidol with another butyrophenone neuroleptic, haloperidol, and the phenothiazine neuroleptic chlorpromazine. Its pharmacokinetics, biotransformation, and safety in several laboratory animal species are also summarized. These preclinical data support its use as an antipsychotic agent and show that it is well absorbed following oral administration with an apparent elimination half-life of approximately 24 h, supporting a once-daily dose regimen. Animal toxicity (including acute- and multiple-dose toxicology and reproductive and mutagenicity studies) show that bromperidol is well tolerated.

Etintidine HCl is a potent H2-blocker. The effect of clinical doses of etintidine on the disposition of theophylline was investigated in 10 male volunteers. This was a double-blind, two-way crossover study. Each subject received etintidine (400 mg) or placebo twice a day with meals for 4 days on two occasions (separated by 4 days). On each occasion, the subjects were fasted overnight on Day 3 and were given an oral dose of theophylline elixir (5 mg/kg) 30 min following the administration of the morning dose of etintidine or placebo on Day 4. Blood samples were collected prior to and up to 24 h following the administration of theophylline. Plasma theophylline levels were analysed by HPLC. Theophylline was rapidly absorbed following oral administration of the theophylline elixir to both the placebo and etintidine treatment groups. Comparison of the pharmacokinetic parameters of theophylline between the etintidine and the placebo groups indicates that while etintidine did not significantly (p greater than 0.05) affect the apparent Cmax (11.1 vs 10.0 micrograms ml-1) and Tmax (1.7 vs 1.4 h) values of theophylline, etintidine significantly reduced the oral clearance (0.0200 vs 0.0564 l kg-1 h-1, p = 0.000006) and prolonged the elimination half-life (16.8 vs 6.0 h) of theophylline. The data indicate that etintidine, like cimetidine, extended the elimination of theophylline in humans.

17beta-Acetoxy-2alpha-chloro-3-(p-nitrophenoxy)imino-5alpha-androstane (I) is a lipophilic steroid with postimplantive antifertility activity in laboratory animals. The bioavailability of micronized I from solutions and suspensions was compared in four groups of adult female Wistar rats. Each group received varying concentrations of micronized 3H-I (specific activity of 0.38--8.94 muCi/mg) in sesame oil by oral gavage. Samples of whole blood and urine collected following drug administration were assayed for radioactive content. Calculation of the mean area under the blood radioactivity versus time curve, when corrected for the quantity of drug administered, indicated that a substantially larger fraction of the dose was absorbed in the two instances where I was present only in solution. A linear relationship between the amount of I absorbed based on whole blood radioactivity and urinary excretion and the administered dose was found primarily for groups receiving the drug in solution. Preliminary results in humans indicate that 3H-I was absorbed to a much greater extent following oral administration of the drug in sesame oil than when admixed with lactose.

Etintidine HCl is a potent H2-blocker. The effect of clinical doses of etintidine on the disposition of a single oral dose of propranolol was investigated in 12 normal subjects. This was a double-blind, two-way crossover study. Each subject received etintidine (400 mg) or placebo twice a day with meals for 4 days on two occasions (separated by 4 days). On each occasion, the subjects were fasted overnight on Day 3 and were given an oral dose of Inderal (40 mg propranolol hydrochloride) 30 min following the administration of the morning dose of etintidine or placebo on Day 4. Blood samples were collected prior to and up to 24 hr following the administration of propranolol. The plasma samples were analyzed for propranolol and 4-hydroxypropranolol by HPLC. Comparison of the pharmacokinetic parameters of propranolol between etintidine and the placebo groups indicates that etintidine significantly increased the AUC0-infinity values (573.5 vs. 146.4 ng.hr/ml, p = 0.0001) and prolonged the elimination half-life (4.61 vs. 2.33 hr) of propranolol. Statistical evaluation of the pharmacokinetic parameters of 4-hydroxypropranolol indicates that etintidine also increased the AUC0-24 values (43.8 vs. 16.4 ng.hr/ml, p = 0.0028) and prolonged the elimination half-life (4.87 vs. 1.97 hr) of 4-hydroxypropranolol. The data suggest that etintidine, like cimetidine, impaired the elimination of propranolol. Etintidine also protracted the elimination of 4-hydroxypropranolol, an active metabolite of propranolol.

Tinidazole is a potent nitroimidazole compound active against, and used to treat, Trichomonas vaginalis infections in males and females. Speculation exists in the literature that observed differences in tinidazole plasma concentrations between males and females may be due to sex-mediated pharmacokinetic differences. To investigate this phenomenon, a study was designed to determine the pharmacokinetics of tinidazole in male and female subjects. Six male and six female volunteers were each administered a single 2-Gm oral dose of tinidazole. Plasma and urine samples, collected over a 72-hour period, were assayed by a sensitive and specific HPLC assay. Results demonstrate a significant correlation between tinidazole oral plasma clearance and body weight and apparent volume of distribution of tinidazole and body weight for male and female subjects, respectively. There were no apparent sex-mediated differences in weight-normalized pharmacokinetic parameters as documented by statistically equivalent mean oral plasma clearances (36.1 and 35.4 ml/kg/hour), apparent volumes of distribution (0.65 and 0.63 liter/kg), and elimination half-lives (12.3 and 12.3 hours, males and females, respectively). Mean area under the tinidazole plasma concentration-versus-time curve and mean peak plasma concentration of tinidazole were 1.3 times greater for females than for males, apparently due to the smaller mean body weight of females and consequently a 1.3 times greater administered dose to the females on a weight basis.

A pharmacokinetic study of the antidiarrheal agent loperamide hydrochloride (Imodium) was conducted in six male subjects. The study utilized a random crossover design and employed a 2-mg capsule and a 0.2-mg/ml syrup formulation. Each treatment consisted of a single oral dose of 8 mg loperamide HCl followed by a two-week interval before the next treatment. Serum and urine samples obtained at various times after drug administration were assayed for loperamide using a radioimmunoassay specific for the drug. The mean biologic half-life, calculated from the elimination phase of the log serum concentration-versus-time data, was 10.8 +/- 0.6 hours for the overall study, 10.2 +/- 0.6 hours for the syrup formulation, and 11.2 +/- 0.8 hours for the capsules. The loperamide from the syrup was absorbed more rapidly than from the capsule formulation, with the peak serum levels observed at a mean time of 2.4 +/- 0.7 hours for the syrup and 5.2 +/- 0.3 hours for the capsule formulation. The relative areas under the serum loperamide concentration-versus-time curves suggested that the two formulations have comparable physiologic availability. The maximum observed serum concentrations were also similar, indicating the safety of the syrup formulation. Excretion of approximately 1 per cent of the dose in the urine as unchanged loperamide after seven days was observed independent of the particular dosage form that was administered.

Etintidine HCl is an H2 receptor antagonist which has been under clinical trial for the treatment of duodenal ulcer diseases. Our studies are to determine the effects of routes of administration, doses, dosage forms, and chronic dosing on the bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of etintidine (E) in the beagle dog. Salient findings are: 1. Plasma levels of etintidine after i.v. administration of 200 mg of E followed a 3-exponential decay with a terminal t1/2 of 1.7h. 2. Following oral administration of 200 mg of E in capsules, tablets, or a solution dosage form to dogs, etintidine was rapidly and nearly completely absorbed with no significant first-pass elimination. 3. A proportional increase in the amount of etintidine absorbed in the dogs occurred as the administered doses increased from 30 to 180 mg kg-1 and this relationship did not change with repeated dosing. 4. Some accumulation of etintidine took place during the 52 weeks of chronic dosing.

The present study was designed to determine the single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetic profiles of the H2 receptor antagonist etintidine in healthy volunteers. Etintidine was rapidly absorbed and eliminated after the oral administration of 300 mg base equivalent of etintidine HCl in a capsule formulation to 11 healthy subjects. Comparison of the pharmacokinetics after a single dose and during steady state showed no significant differences (p greater than 0.05) in the mean values of Cmax, tmax, oral clearance, elimination rate constant, and renal clearance, indicating no significant accumulation of etintidine and no apparent time-dependent changes in the pharmacokinetics of etintidine during multiple dose administration.

The pharmacokinetics of etintidine (E), a potent H2 blocker, were studied in 12 normal, fasted subjects. The subjects received five ascending doses of E HCl in capsules at 72-h intervals. Blood and urine samples were collected and the plasma and urine levels of E were determined by HPLC. Following oral administration, plasma E levels showed double peaks in half of the subjects. Mean Cmax (0.42, 2.11, 3.82, 4.50, and 7.15 micrograms ml-1), AUC0-infinity (0.96, 4.94, 11.3, 17.5, and 24.5 h micrograms ml-1), and the amount of E excreted unchanged in 72 h (20, 54.8, 170, 320, and 371 mg) were determined. These parameters indicate the amount of E absorbed increased linearly with dose for each individual. Renal clearance was independent of the dose and the mean value (16.6 lh-1) was about twice that of the creatinine clearance (which did not significantly change as a result of E treatment), indicating that E is actively secreted into the renal tubules. As E was eliminated rapidly from the body (t1/2 less than 2 h), no substantial accumulation of E is expected after multiple dose treatment.

The disposition of ORF 9326 [17BETA-acetoxy-2alpha-chloro-3(p-nitrophenoxy) imino-5-androstane], an O-aryl oxime of 2beta-chlorodihydrotestosterone acetate, was studied in rats, dogs, monkeys and rabbits. Intravenous administration of 3H-ORF 9326 dissolved in PEG-400 to rats, dogs and monkeys resulted in a rapid decline of radioactivity in blood followed by a terminal slope suggesting long retention of radioactivity. Apparent half lives of radioactivity in blood were calculated to be from 50--95 hours for the three species, which peak levels of radioactivity in whole blood occurring within 4--7 hours after administration of the compound. Tissue distribution studies in the rat and dog indicate that body fat is one of the major depot areas for the drug and/or its metabolites. The major route of excretion for ORF 9326 and/or its metabolites in dog and rat is biliary whereas in monkey and rabbit it appears to be renal. Greater than 90% of the radioactive compounds excreted in the urine of dogs and monkeys following intravenous administration of 3H-ORF 9326 appear to be in the form of conjugates.

Suprofen is a nonsteroidal analgesic with demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of mild to moderate pain associated with a variety of clinical conditions. Because nonsteroidal analgesic agents may cause gastrointestinal side effects, they are frequently prescribed with food or milk. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a standard meal and milk alone on the rate and extent of absorption of suprofen. In a randomized three-way cross-over study, 24 healthy volunteers each received a single 200-mg oral dose of suprofen in the fasted state half an hour after a standard meal or half an hour after an 8-ounce glass of milk. The influence of food and milk was greater on the rate than on the extent of absorption of suprofen as illustrated by a more pronounced effect on Cmax than on AUC. In addition, food had a greater influence on the bioavailability of suprofen than milk. Food decreased the mean Cmax to 44% and the mean AUC to 81% relative to the fasted state, whereas milk decreased the mean Cmax to 74% and the mean AUC to only 87% of the respective parameters in the fasted state. Symmetrical confidence intervals demonstrated that the mean AUCmilk was within only 19% and the mean AUCfood was within only 25% of the mean AUC in the fasted state, with 95% confidence.

A three-way crossover study was conducted in 24 normal, male volunteers to compare the bioavailability of etintidine from capsules (2 X 200 mg) taken under fasting conditions, with food and with milk. Blood samples were collected prior to and at various times after each treatment and plasma levels of etintidine were determined by high performance liquid chromatography. Statistical analysis of the plasma etintidine concentration data indicated that while neither food nor milk had an apparent effect (p greater than 0.05) on the rate of etintidine absorption, both food alone and milk alone slightly decreased the extent of etintidine absorption. Mean bioavailability parameters of etintidine obtained following the administration of etintidine with food, milk or under fasting conditions are 5.28, 5.26 and 5.88 micrograms.h/ml, respectively (for AUC) and 1.75, 2.18 and 2.59 micrograms/ml, respectively (for Cmax), and 1.23, 1.01 and 0.91 h, respectively (for tmax). Symmetrical 95% confidence interval analyses showed that the observed decreases of less than 11% in the AUC values of etintidine following the concomitant administration of food or milk were within 17% of the fasting value and, therefore, may not be of clinical significance.