1. Robotic arm-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: comparing complications, costs, and postoperative opioid use in propensity-matched cohorts.
- Author
-
Norton J, Sambandam S, Mounasamy V, and Weinschenk RC
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Aged, Middle Aged, Anemia economics, Anemia etiology, Prosthesis-Related Infections economics, Prosthesis-Related Infections etiology, Acute Kidney Injury etiology, Acute Kidney Injury economics, Acute Kidney Injury epidemiology, Acute Kidney Injury prevention & control, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee economics, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee adverse effects, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee methods, Analgesics, Opioid therapeutic use, Analgesics, Opioid economics, Propensity Score, Robotic Surgical Procedures economics, Robotic Surgical Procedures adverse effects, Robotic Surgical Procedures methods, Pain, Postoperative etiology, Postoperative Complications economics, Postoperative Complications etiology, Postoperative Complications epidemiology
- Abstract
Purpose: Limited literature exists substantiating benefits of robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty (raTKA) over conventional total knee arthroplasty (cTKA). This study compared postoperative pain, complications, and costs between patients undergoing raTKA and cTKA using large, propensity score-matched cohorts. We hypothesize that the raTKA cohort will be associated with lower pain, lower anemia, and similar cost and other complications., Methods: A commercially available patient database was used for this study. Patients with raTKA and cTKA were identified with current procedural terminology and international classification of diseases (ICD-9/ICD-10) codes. Exclusions and propensity score matching were applied to mitigate confounding bias. Complication rates, costs, and postoperative opioid uses were then compared between groups., Results: Compared with patients with cTKAs (n = 31,105), patients with raTKAs (n = 6,221) had less postoperative opioid use (p < 0.01), lower rates of postoperative acute renal failure (OR 0.71; p < 0.01), anemia (OR 0.75; p < 0.01), and periprosthetic joint infection (OR 0.59; p = 0.04), and lower index costs ($875 vs. $1,169, p < 0.01)., Conclusion: RaTKA was associated with less postoperative pain and complications compared with cTKA., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF