Search

Valid and updated clinical indicators can serve as important tools in assessing and improving eyecare delivery. Indicators for diabetic eyecare in Australia were previously developed from guidelines published before 2013 and then used to assess the appropriateness of care delivery through a nationwide patient record card audit (the iCareTrack study). To reflect emerging evidence and contemporary practice, this study aimed to update clinical indicators for optometric care for people with type 2 diabetes in Australia. Forty-five candidate indicators, including existing iCareTrack and new indicators derived from nine high-quality evidence-based guidelines, were generated. A two-round modified Delphi process where expert panel members rated the impact, acceptability, and feasibility of the indicators on a 9-point scale and voted for inclusion or exclusion of the candidate indicators was used. Consensus on inclusion was reached when the median scores for impact, acceptability, and feasibility were ≥7 and >75% of experts voted for inclusion. Thirty-two clinical indicators with high acceptability, impact and feasibility ratings (all median scores: 9) were developed. The final indicators were related to history taking (n = 12), physical examination (n = 8), recall period (n = 5), referral (n = 5), and patient education/communication (n = 2). Most (14 of 15) iCareTrack indicators were retained either in the original format or with modifications. New indicators included documenting the type of diabetes, serum lipid level, pregnancy, systemic medications, nephropathy, Indigenous status, general practitioner details, pupil examination, intraocular pressure, optical coherence tomography, diabetic retinopathy grading, recall period for high-risk diabetic patients without retinopathy, referral of high-risk proliferative retinopathy, communication with the general practitioner, and patient education. A set of 32 updated diabetic eyecare clinical indicators was developed based on contemporary evidence and expert consensus. These updated indicators inform the development of programs to assess and enhance the eyecare delivery for people with diabetes in Australia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Amblyopia is characterised by reduced visual acuity, poor binocular sensory fusion, and impaired or absent stereoacuity. Understanding the extent to which amblyopia affects everyday task performance is important to quantifying the disease burden of amblyopia and can assist clinicians to understand patients' likely functional capability. Methods A systematic literature search identified published studies comparing fine visuomotor performance in either children or adults with amblyopia and those with normal binocular vision. The included studies (22 studies involving 835 amblyopes and 561 controls) reported results of self-perception patient reported outcome measures, tests of motor proficiency and video recorded reaching and grasping. The outcomes of 17 studies were grouped into four meta-analyses, with pooled results reported as standardised mean difference (SMD) with corresponding 95% CI. Results Regardless of the cause of amblyopia (anisometropia, strabismus, mixed, deprivation), significant reduction in self-perception of physical competence and athletic competence (SMD=-0.74, 95% CI -1.23 to -0.25, p=0.003); fine motor skills scores (SMD=-0.86, 95% CI -1.27 to -0.45, p<0.0001); speed of visually guided reaching and grasping movements (SMD=0.86, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.08, p<0.00001); and precision of temporal eye-hand coordination (SMD=0.75, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.25, p=0.003) occurred in amblyopes compared with those with normal visual development. Conclusion Reports of the impact of amblyopia on fine motor skills performance find poorer outcomes in participants with amblyopia compared with those with normal vision development. Consistency in the outcome measure used to assess the functional impact of amblyopia would be valuable for future studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The Queensland Children's Hospital Paediatric Optometry Alignment Program commenced with a pilot phase to assess its feasibility, effectiveness and acceptability. This study identified the barriers that hinder effective interprofessional collaboration and the facilitators that contribute to its success, and assessed changes in optometrists' satisfaction since the pilot phase of the collaborative care programme. Methods: Qualitative deductive and inductive content analysis was applied to open‐ended free‐text survey responses collected in 2018 from the optometrists involved in the Program's pilot phase. The responses were coded using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to categorise barriers and facilitators into key themes. Key behavioural determinants were mapped to the COM‐B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation‐Behaviour) elements of the Behaviour Change Wheel model to identify intervention strategies. Intervention recommendations were derived from behaviour change mapping and compared with programme quality improvement initiatives. A cross‐sectional explanatory survey informed by the TDF was conducted within the current 2023 cohort, and a longitudinal comparative analysis was carried out using data from the 2018 survey. Results: Among the 97 surveys distributed in 2018, 44 respondents participated; from this group, 38 individuals contributed a total of 200 free‐text responses. Facilitators (240 comments) outnumbered barriers (65 comments). Key facilitators were accessible and timely care, professional development, confidence and positive outcome beliefs. Barriers included communication, information handover, credibility, relationships and skill gaps. Optometrists actively engaged in the programme in 2023 reported heightened satisfaction with their involvement, increased confidence and greater engagement in paediatric eyecare delivery. However, challenges in clinical information transfer persist. Conclusion: The interprofessional collaborative model of paediatric eyecare has contributed efficiencies within the health system by building paediatric care capacity in the community, fostering professional credibility and promoting interdisciplinary trust. Insights gained should prove valuable for other paediatric eyecare services exploring hospital‐to‐community care models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Knowledge of ocular diseases and understanding of the complex interplay between eye and systemic health have increased over the years. This knowledge is particularly important when caring for our youngest and most vulnerable paediatric patients when ophthalmic manifestations may provide an insight to underlying systemic diseases and can act as the first indicator of an undiagnosed systemic condition. Further, the visual system can be vulnerable to manifestations of known systemic disease, with vigilant ophthalmic examination generally aiding early identification of ocular complications for collaborative multidisciplinary care to prevent avoidable vision loss. The potential ocular signs and complications of the following developmental, genetic or acquired childhood systemic disorders are presented: premature birth, trisomy 21, albinism, Marfan's syndrome, Stickler's syndrome, septo-optic dysplasia, aniridia, neurofibromatosis 1, Sturge-Weber syndrome, papilloedema, juvenile idiopathic arthritis and vitamin A deficiency. Rather than providing an exhaustive list of diseases, this review offers an overview of the more commonly encountered congenital or acquired childhood systemic conditions that have associated childhood ophthalmic disorders and presents referral and ongoing surveillance recommendations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Collaboration between hospital-based ophthalmology and community-based optometry could pave the way to improve access to paediatric eyecare services. The Paediatric Optometry Alignment Program (POAP) began in 2016 as a proof-of-concept pilot project that aimed to improve access to specialist paediatric ophthalmology services. If found to be effective at improving patient access, and the quality of care acceptable to patients and professionals then the strategic intent was to upscale the programme to serve as a model for paediatric eye care in the community. Temporal observational trend analysis was used to review ophthalmology clinic appointment waitlists prior and post POAP pilot project commencement. Family satisfaction with post-discharge care was surveyed in a purposive sample of 30 patients. Aligned optometrists in the program pilot (n = 97) were invited to complete an online survey (response rate 46%; n = 45). The percentage of children waiting longer than clinically recommended fell from 72% to 36%. Sixty-seven percent of surveyed families had attended a community optometrist as recommended, and all rated the optometry experience from good to excellent. Participating optometrists reported high levels of satisfaction with involvement in the program, and increased confidence and involvement in paediatric eye care delivery. The need to improve formal transfer of clinical information was identified. Facilitated integrated care between community-based optometrists and a hospital-based ophthalmology department can improve access for tertiary care services, with high satisfaction for families and participating community-based optometrists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]