Search

Patients with psoriasis (PsO) should adhere to and be persistent with treatment to maintain disease control. Patient support programs (PSPs) are useful to support patients with disease management. We aimed to understand the real-world patient profile and persistence of ixekizumab-initiating Canadian patients with moderate-to-severe PsO using PSP data.This retrospective observational study was conducted utilizing a Canadian PSP database (May 2016 to March 2020). Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 18 years with moderate-to-severe PsO, initiated ixekizumab, enrolled in the PSP for ≥ 6 months, and provided informed consent. Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI), body surface area (BSA) involvement, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) were collected at PSP entry. Adherence [using the proportion of days covered (PDC)] and persistence (using Kaplan-Meier curves) were assessed after 1-year and 2-year follow-ups. Differences in persistence between biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced patients were compared using Cox proportional hazards model after adjusting baseline parameters.In total, 1891 ixekizumab-treated moderate-to-severe patients with PsO were included. The mean [standard deviation (SD)] age was 52.3 (13.3) years; 51.1% of patients were 45-65 years old and 61.4% were male. At baseline, the mean (SD) PASI score was 14.3 (8.1), the DLQI score was 16.5 (7.7), and BSA % was 17.4 (15.1). PsO lesions were commonly located on the hands (33.4%), face (28.6%), and feet (23.8%). Ixekizumab-treated patients were highly adherent [PDC ≥ 80%: 1-year (92.0%), 2-year (87.7%)] and persistent [1-year (90.4%), 2-year (85.6%)]. Biologic-naïve patients were more adherent (1-year, 94.6% versus 87.3%; 2-year, 90.3% versus 83.5%) than biologic-experienced patients. Significantly higher persistence in biologic-naïve versus biologic-experienced patients for 1-year (p 0.01) and 2-year (p = 0.010) follow-up periods was observed after adjusting for baseline parameters.Patients with moderate-to-severe PsO overwhelmingly remained on ixekizumab treatment for more than 2 years while participating in a PSP.

International Dermatology Outcome Measures (IDEOM) is a non-profit organization founded in 2013. It is composed of researchers and stakeholders who work to develop evidenced-based outcome measures to enhance research and treatment recommendations of dermatologic diseases.The 2021 IDEOM Virtual Annual Meeting occurred from November 19-20, 2021. Contributions were made by leaders and stakeholders from the psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, pediatric hidradenitis suppurativa, acne, vitiligo, actinic keratosis, alopecia areata, itch, and cutaneous lymphoma workgroups. The psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and actinic keratosis workgroups provided an overview of their respective instruments for treatment satisfaction and symptom measurement. The inaugural meetings of the itch, alopecia areata, and cutaneous lymphoma workgroups identified unmet needs of their respective diseases and future goals. The acne, vitiligo, and pediatric hidradenitis suppurativa workgroups discussed concerns of quality of life, instruments for symptom measurement, and screening tools. Additionally, a representative from the US Food and Drug Administration was in attendance and presented an update on topical drugs and generics. This report provides a summary of workgroup updates from the past year and future directions established during the meeting.This report summarizes progress made by each IDEOM workgroup at the 2021 IDEOM Virtual Annual Meeting. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(8):867-874. doi:10.36849/JDD.6974.

Background: Validated, inclusive and easy-to-use outcomes for hidradenitis suppurativa are essential both in the clinical trial setting and clinical practice. The continuous IHS4 is a validated tool that dynamically assesses nodules/abscesses/draining tunnels and classifies disease severity as mild/moderate/severe. However, dichotomous outcomes are often required for clinical trials reporting. Objective: To develop and validate a dichotomous outcome based on IHS4 that can be used in clinical trial settings and day-to-day clinical practice. Methods: De-identified data from the PIONEER-I and -II studies were accessed through Vivli. Potential IHS4 thresholds were analysed using baseline to Week 12 data from adalimumab- and placebo-treated hidradenitis suppurativa patients in the PIONEER-I trial. The final threshold was chosen based on its ability to discriminate between patients treated with adalimumab or placebo and its association with reduction in inflammatory lesions. The final threshold was validated using data from baseline to Week 12 from adalimumab- and placebo-treated hidradenitis suppurativa patients in both the PIONEER-II and the combined PIONEER-I and -II studies. Results: The best performing cut-off for the IHS4 was a 55% reduction of the IHS4 score (IHS4-55). Patients who achieved the IHS4-55 had an odd's ratio of 2.00 [95%-CI 1.26–3.18, p = 0.003], 2.79 (95%-CI 1.76–4.43, p < 0.001) and 2.16 (95%-CI 1.43–3.29, p < 0.001) for being treated with adalimumab rather than placebo in PIONEER-I, PIONEER-II and the combined dataset, respectively. Additionally, the achievement of the IHS4-55 was associated with a significant reduction in inflammatory nodules, abscesses and draining tunnels in all analysed datasets. Conclusions: IHS4-55, a novel dichotomous IHS4 version, based on a 55% reduction of the total score was developed. The IHS4-55 performs similarly to the HiSCR in discriminating between adalimumab- and placebo-treated hidradenitis suppurativa patients and shows significant associations with reductions in lesion counts. Moreover, the IHS4-55 addresses some of the HiSCR drawbacks by dynamically including draining tunnels in a validated manner. By allowing the analysis of hidradenitis suppurativa patients with an abscess and nodule count below 3 but many draining tunnels, this outcome measure will improve inclusivity in clinical trials.

Background: Previously, a new dichotomous outcome was developed, calculated as 55% reduction in the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa 4 score (IHS4-55). It was validated in datasets of adalimumab and placebo treated HS patients. External validation is an important aspect of clinical outcomes. Objectives: We aimed to externally validate the novel dichotomous IHS4-55 in a non-biologic treated dataset of HS patients. Methods: Data from a previously published European-wide prospective clinical study of antibiotic treatment of HS patients was used to assess the association of IHS4-55 achievement with individual reduction in inflammatory nodules, abscesses and draining tunnels. Moreover, the associations between IHS4-55 positivity and achievement of the minimal clinically important differences (MCID) for Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), numerical rating scale (NRS) Pain, and NRS Pruritus were analyzed. Results: Data was obtained from 283 individual patients, of which 36.4% (103/283) were treated with clindamycin and rifampicin and 63.6% (180/283) with tetracyclines for 12 weeks. Achievers of the IHS4-55 demonstrated a significant reduction the counts of inflammatory nodules, abscesses, and draining tunnels (all p

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an immunomodulatory therapy that has been used for over 35 years to treat numerous conditions. ECP was initially approved by the US FDA in 1988 for the treatment of Sézary syndrome, a leukemic form of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Although CTCL remains the only FDA-approved indication, ECP has since been used off-label for numerous other conditions, including graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), systemic sclerosis, autoimmune bullous dermatoses, Crohn's disease, and prevention of solid organ transplant rejection. In Canada, ECP is mainly used to treat CTCL, acute and chronic GvHD, and in some instances systemic sclerosis. Herein, we review the current concepts regarding ECP mechanism of action, treatment considerations and protocols, and efficacy.

Background Psoriasis is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory disease with an implied connection to psychiatric disorders. Objective This study aims to illustrate an association between psoriasis and psychiatric disorders using real world data gathered from the Newfoundland and Labrador population. Methods Data on 15,100 patients with psoriasis and 75,500 controls (1:5) was collected from the Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information’s Electronic Health Records. The cases and controls were matched for age, sex, and geography. Indicators for psychiatric disorders include diagnosis of mental illnesses from physician’s visits and hospitalization records (all coded for mental health using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes). Results 9,991 (66.2%) cases were identified to have at least one visit with a diagnostic code for mental illness compared to 42,276 (56.0%), P < .0001 in the control group. The percentage of people coded for anxiety was 36.50% compared to 28.95%, P < .0001; depression was 37.04% compared to 30.19%, P < .0001; and adjustment disorder was 6.89% versus 5.48%, P < .0001, among those with and without psoriasis, respectively. The greatest risk for anxiety [OR 1.4 (1.20, 1.67)] and depression [OR 1.65 (1.36, 2.00)] among psoriasis patients was between the 0 to 20 age group. Women with psoriasis are more likely to have anxiety [OR 1.08 (1.03, 1.13)], depression [OR 1.04 (1.01, 1.09)] and adjustment disorder [OR 1.07 (0.98, 1.17)] compared to female controls. Conclusion Our result shows that patients with psoriasis have an increased prevalence of mental illness. Using real world data to carry out further investigations will better elucidate this association and provide an increased understanding of the association between psoriasis and mental disorders.

Background Real-world knowledge of the burden of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) on patients remains limited. Objectives To measure the impact of adalimumab on moderate-to-severe HS patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and work productivity. Methods In 23 Canadian centres, 138 adults with moderate-to-severe HS requiring a change in ongoing therapy were treated with adalimumab for up to 52 weeks as per the physician’s practice. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were obtained at baseline, weeks 24 and 52 to measure overall HRQoL, HS severity, levels of anxiety and depression, impact and symptoms of HS, work productivity and activity impairment. A post-hoc analysis further explored the PROMs by abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count at baseline (≤5, low; 6–10, medium; ≥11, high). Results From baseline to weeks 24 and 52, all PRO overall scores improved significantly ( P ≤ .0023). The number of patients reporting “good disease control” and “complete disease control” increased from 9.7% to 66.4% over 52 weeks. The score in Health Utility Index Mark 3 (HUI3) pain attribute meaningfully decreased over 52 weeks (mean difference ≥.05). The HS symptoms skin “tenderness” and “itchiness” improved the most. Work productivity loss and activity impairment improved by approximately 20% over 52 weeks. Disease burden improved more in 24 week responders with low and medium AN counts at baseline than in those with high AN count or in 24 week nonresponders. Conclusion At week 24 and maintained at week 52 in a real-world setting, adalimumab meaningfully improved HRQoL, work productivity, and activity impairment in moderate-to-severe HS patients.

IntroductionPsoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a complex, immune-mediated disease associated with skin psoriasis that, if left untreated, can lead to joint destruction. Up to 30% of patients with psoriasis progress to PsA. In most cases, psoriasis precedes synovio-entheseal inflammation by an average of 5–7 years, providing a unique opportunity for early and potentially preventive intervention in a susceptible and identifiable population. Guselkumab is an effective IL-23p19 inhibitor Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis and PsA. The Preventing Arthritis in a Multicentre Psoriasis At-Risk cohort (PAMPA) study aims to evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab in preventing PsA and decreasing musculoskeletal power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS) abnormalities in a population of patients with psoriasis who are at-increased risk for PsA progression.Methods and analysisThe PAMPA study is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, interventional, preventive trial comparing PDUS involvement and conversion to PsA in patients with psoriasis at-increased risk for progression treated with guselkumab compared with non-biological standard of care. The study includes a screening period, a double-blind treatment period (24 weeks) and an open-label follow-up period (72 weeks). At baseline, 200 subjects will be randomised (1:1) to receive either guselkumab 100 mg (arm 1) or placebo switching to guselkumab 100 mg starting at week 24 (arm 2). Arm 3 will follow 150 at-risk psoriasis patients who decline biological therapy and randomisation. Changes from baseline in the PDUS score at week 24 and the difference in proportion of patients transitioning to PsA at 96 weeks will be examined as the coprimary endpoints.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval for this study was granted by the coordinating centre’s (NYU School of Medicine) Institutional Review Board (IRB). Each participating site received approval through their own IRBs. The findings will be shared in peer-reviewed articles and scientific conference presentations.Trial registration numberNCT05004727.

Linked Article: Kjærsgaard Andersen et al. Br J Dermatol 2022; 186:78–85.

IMPORTANCE: Hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by occlusion of hair follicles as a primary pathogenic factor. There are scarce data regarding the prevalence of HS. OBJECTIVE: To estimate overall HS prevalence. DATA SOURCES: This review and meta-regression analysis was conducted using the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) reporting guideline. The academic search included PubMed, Cochrane registry, ClinicalTrials.gov, and evidence by NHS UK and Trip databases from inception through May 2020. To analyze HS prevalence, only cross-sectional studies or baseline assessments of longitudinal cohorts using census-based surveys or probabilistic and nonprobabilistic epidemiologic methods were considered. The search terms were (prevalence OR incidence OR epidemiology) AND (hidradenitis suppurativa OR acne inversa OR Verneuil’s disease). No language restriction was applied. STUDY SELECTION: Original investigations that reported HS prevalence were included. After exclusion criteria were applied, 17 studies qualified for qualitative analysis, but only 16 studies were quantitatively assessed. DATA EXTRACTION AND MEASURES: Two reviewers extracted data by age, diagnostic criteria, presence of any comorbidity, sample sizes, continent/location, sex, and other characteristics. Assessment of bias risk used the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Instrument for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data using random-effects models to synthesize available evidence. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Hidradenitis suppurativa prevalence (with 95% CI) among the overall population and among subgroups. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed (Cochran Q statistic) and quantified (I(2) statistic). RESULTS: In 16 quantitatively assessed studies included, prevalence estimates were reported only from Western European and Scandinavian countries, the US, and Australia. Meta-analysis with random effects, after adjusting for publication bias in the prevalence estimates, revealed a 0.40% prevalence (95% CI, 0.26%-0.63%) for HS. Studies based on clinical samples revealed a higher pooled prevalence of HS (1.7%) than population-based studies (0.3%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this systematic review and meta-regression analysis may help facilitate policy formulation, channeling funding and guiding principles for better disease diagnosis using universal valid tools and management.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a common inflammatory disorder characterized by recurrent, painful, and malodorous abscesses and nodules predominantly in skin folds. HS is associated with substantial morbidity and poor quality of life. There are no curative therapies, and the only approved biologic drug has variable efficacy and requires high doses, making adjunct treatments crucial. An important risk factor for disease severity is obesity. Our primary objective was to conduct a systematic review examining weight loss and dietary interventions, in HS. Our secondary objective was to examine nutritional supplements in HS.A systematic literature search was conducted using Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database. We included all study types in adults (>18 years), with a minimum sample size of 5, examining the effects of any dietary or weight loss intervention on HS severity. Two authors screened n = 1279 articles of which 9 met inclusion criteria. All included studies were observational and all interventions were associated with various measures of decreased HS severity. Patient-controlled weight loss and bariatric surgery were associated with HS regression, though a subset of patients with significant increase in panniculi experienced exacerbations and required excision of excess skin. Diets demonstrating benefit eliminated dairy and brewer’s yeast. Nutritional supplements including zinc gluconate, vitamin D, and riboflavin had a suppressive, rather than curative, effect on HS lesions in single studies. Overall, the reviewed interventions show promise as potential adjunct treatments in a HS management plan. Prospective randomized controlled trials should validate these findings.

Background: The treat-to-target (T2T) strategy has become established in several medical specialties as a key guidance to optimal therapeutic decision making. T2T may be effective in the assessment of the biologic class of agents called interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors, which are emerging as a safe and effective treatment option for autoimmune inflammatory conditions such as plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Objective: The objective of this article is to use a T2T approach for the evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of IL-17 inhibitors in the management of patients with plaque psoriasis, PsA, and AS. Methods: Following a comprehensive literature search, a full-day meeting was convened to discuss and identify the T2T targets for psoriasis, PsA, and AS. Clinical trial evidence was presented for the approved IL-17 inhibitors—secukinumab, ixekizumab, and brodalumab—to assess whether these data meet T2T safety and efficacy targets. Results: All 3 approved agents were significantly superior to placebo and active controls in the achievement of T2T targets for psoriasis. Secukinumab and ixekizumab were likewise associated with significantly better outcomes than controls in the PsA targets, and secukinumab resulted in significant AS target improvements vs placebo. The IL-17 inhibitors were also associated with low rates of serious adverse events and exacerbations of common comorbid conditions. Conclusion: Phase III trial results support the T2T benefit and safety of IL-17 inhibitors according to their specific indications for the management of patients with plaque psoriasis, PsA, and AS.

Real-world data for psoriasis includes registries, and meta-analyses could help guide biologic therapy choice. The objective was to determine the prevalence and reason for discontinuation of biologic or PD4 inhibitor therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada from 2001 to 2017. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on data collected between 2001 and 2017, to determine the type of biologic therapy or PD4 inhibitor, length of treatment, prevalence of and reason for discontinuation. As multiple patients have been on more than one therapy (ie, an average of 1.8), the 459 patients included in the registry have had a total of 913 exposures to biologic or PD4 inhibitors. The treatment mean time was 37 months (SD 39.95). A total of 180 patients remained on their first biologic of which 75% were male. The average number of biologics per patient was 1.99. The reasons for discontinuation were primary failure (28.5%), adverse events (26.4%), secondary failure (24.3%), patient choice (4.4%), other/unknown in (6.6%), drug withdrawal from market (6.8%), and drug coverage issues (3%). The most common reasons for discontinuation of biologics or PD4 inhibitors include primary failure, adverse events, and secondary failures. Males were more likely to remain on their first biologic.

Background Long-term, real-word data are needed to help manage patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) through this recurrent, painful and debilitating disease. Objectives To primarily measure real-world effectiveness of adalimumab in HS and to secondarily observe clinical course of HS in the light of patients' response. Methods In SOLACE, adults with moderate-to-severe HS in need for change in ongoing therapy were treated with adalimumab for up to 52 weeks as per physician's medical practice. Treatment effectiveness was measured by Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR). Inflammatory nodules, abscesses and draining fistulas were counted, Hurley stage was assessed, and disease severity was rated using the International HS Severity Scoring System (IHS4). A post hoc analysis further explored the HiSCR response by abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count at baseline (low, medium and high) and gender. Spontaneously reported safety events were collected. Results From 23 Canadian centres, 69% of the 138 patients achieved HiSCR at week 24, which increased to 82% and 75% at week 52 in patients with medium and high AN counts, respectively. Gender (4 times the odds for female) and age at HS onset (5% decrease with each additional year) had an effect on achieving HiSCR. Treatment with adalimumab led to an important decrease in number of lesions in responders, with most gains observed in inflammatory nodules, more frequently in the lower body area of patients in the high AN count group. The IHS4 scores of responders were substantially lowered, with a larger decrease in patients of the high AN count group. No new safety signal was detected. Conclusions The effectiveness of adalimumab was maintained during this 1-year period, and an optimal gain was documented for patients with medium and high AN counts. These real-world data support a prompt treatment of HS patients and the use of IHS4 to monitor treatment.

Background: The incidence of cutaneous malignant melanoma continues to increase worldwide and in Canada. It is unclear whether the increase in incidence and clinical characteristic trends of cutaneous malignant melanoma are similar in the province of Newfoundland and Labrador. Objective: The objective of this study is to examine the incidence and trends of cutaneous malignant melanoma in Eastern Newfoundland and Labrador. Methods: Patients aged 18 years or older diagnosed with cutaneous malignant melanoma were identified from the Eastern Health Authority’s Cancer Registry. The diagnosis was confirmed by a pathologist via histological subtype. Patients were excluded if the diagnosis was unspecified, a nonmelanoma skin cancer or if there was a recurrence in the same lesion location. In total 298 patients diagnosed with cutaneous malignant melanoma from 2007 to 2015 were included in the analysis. Results: The total incidence increased from 4.1 to 15.6 cases/100,000 person-years, which represents a 283.0% increase from 2007 to 2015. The largest increases in incidence were seen in males and patients aged from 60 to 79 years. The most common lesion anatomical locations were the trunk in males and the lower extremity in females. The majority of cases had a Breslow thickness below 1.0 mm. Conclusion: The incidence of cutaneous malignant melanoma in Eastern Newfoundland and Labrador is increasing at a faster rate than in any other region in Canada. Health care providers should work to be aware of the clinical trends and risk factors associated with this disease to facilitate early detection and prevent morbidity.

Background Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is associated with comorbidities that contribute to poor health, impaired life quality, and mortality risk. Objective To provide evidence-based screening recommendations for comorbidities linked to HS. Methods Systematic reviews were performed to summarize evidence on the prevalence and incidence of 30 comorbidities in patients with HS relative to the general population. The screening recommendation for each comorbidity was informed by the consistency and quality of existing studies, disease prevalence, and magnitude of association, as well as benefits, harms, and feasibility of screening. The level of evidence and strength of corresponding screening recommendation were graded by using the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) criteria. Results Screening is recommended for the following comorbidities: acne, dissecting cellulitis of the scalp, pilonidal disease, pyoderma gangrenosum, depression, generalized anxiety disorder, suicide, smoking, substance use disorder, polycystic ovary syndrome, obesity, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, inflammatory bowel disease, spondyloarthritis, and sexual dysfunction. It is also recommended to screen patients with Down syndrome for HS. The decision to screen for specific comorbidities may vary with patient risk factors. The role of the dermatologist in screening varies according to comorbidity. Limitations Screening recommendations represent one component of a comprehensive care strategy. Conclusions Dermatologists should support screening efforts to identify comorbid conditions in HS.

Introduction: Data on real-world experiences for patients treated with ixekizumab is currently limited.Objectives: Describe characteristics of ixekizumab-treated psoriasis patients and provide evidence of clinical outcomes using disease severity scores Body Surface Area (BSA) and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) in the real world.Methods: Chart review was performed for adult patients treated with ixekizumab at a single Canadian dermatology clinic (February 2017-August 2018). The cohort was stratified into responders (patients who remained on ixekizumab) and non-responders (patients who discontinued ixekizumab). Subgroup analyses were performed for responders to assess clinical improvement stratified by previous biologic exposure.Results: Thirty-eight patients were included (mean observational time 32 weeks). At baseline, mean PASI and BSA were 10.8 and 11.6%, respectively. Mean changes in PASI and BSA were -7.8 and -6.7%, respectively, at week 4. PASI 100 was achieved in 70% of patients. Significant differences in mean change of BSA were seen between bio-naive and bio-experienced patients.Conclusion: This analysis represents the first investigation of early clinical outcomes in a small cohort of Canadian patients treated with ixekizumab. Overall, complete and rapid skin clearance was observed. Future studies including more patients and longer follow-up time are crucial to confirm these findings.

Psoriasis is an inflammatory skin condition affecting 2% to 3% of the population and is associated with several comorbidities, including cardiovascular disease, depression, inflammatory bowel disease, metabolic syndrome, mood disorder, psoriatic arthritis, and weight gain. Psoriasis is treated with a number of topical and systemic therapies, including biologic drugs that directly target proinflammatory cytokines. This cross-sectional retrospective study investigated comorbid conditions reported in the Newfoundland and Labrador psoriasis population, outcomes associated with therapeutic treatment, and use of health care resources. Of the psoriasis comorbidities investigated, psoriatic arthritis was significantly associated with the use of biologic therapy while a failure to respond to biologics was associated with a higher incidence of cardiovascular disease. Patients responsive to biologic treatment had fewer hospital stays than patients treated with other therapies. Our results suggest that biologic therapies have a cardioprotective effect and reduce the number of hospital visits in patients whose symptoms are responsive to treatment.

Unnecessary investigations, inappropriate treatment, worsening disease, and frustration for both patients and health care professionals are the hallmarks of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) management. In light of a new treatment algorithm and biologic therapies made available to patients, an HS model of care is outlined in this article. The recommendations and management strategy presented here have been developed to help address the currently unmet needs of this patient population. The patient-centred model of care and disease management strategies were developed through the guidance and recommendations of HS medical experts in Newfoundland and Labrador. This article lays the foundation for the resources and steps required to change the status of this orphan disease and firmly embed patients with HS within a coordinated and integrative system of care.

Background: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a painful, debilitating, and poorly understood condition, which is suboptimally diagnosed, managed, and treated. Evidence supporting various treatment modalities is sparse. Objectives: To incorporate scientific evidence and expert opinions to develop useful guidance for the evaluation and management of patients with HS. Methods: An expert panel of Canadian dermatologists and surgeons developed statements and recommendations based on available evidence and clinical experience. The statements and recommendations were subjected to analysis and refinement by the panel, and voting was conducted using a modified Delphi technique with a prespecified cutoff agreement of 75%. Results: Ten specific statements and recommendations were accepted by the expert panel. These were grouped into 4 domains: diagnosis and assessment, treatment and management, comorbidities and a multidisciplinary approach, and education. Conclusions: These statements and recommendations will serve to increase awareness of HS and provide a framework for decisions involving diagnosis and management. Evidence suggests that antibacterial and anti–tumour necrosis factor therapies are effective in the treatment of HS. This is supported by the clinical experience of the authors. Further clinical research and the establishment of multidisciplinary management teams will continue to advance management of HS in Canada.

Chronic plaque psoriasis is a common, currently incurable, immune-mediated skin disease affecting approximately 2-3% of the population worldwide (1). Patients frequently require lifelong management...

Background: Despite the complexity of psoriasis treatment using biologic therapy, there does not exist a standardized synoptic reporting form for the initiation of this population. The purpose of this study was to use a modified Delphi approach to develop a standard checklist for the standardized documentation of patients receiving systemic biologic therapy for psoriasis. Methods: A modified Delphi survey was conducted over 3 rounds (February 2017 through January 2018). An expert panel generated a 51-item checklist that was proposed to participants. Items were rated on an anchored 1-7 Likert scale. Consensus was defined apriori as ≥ 70% agreement by respondents. Results: A total of 58, 17, and 18 dermatologists participated in 3 consecutive Delphi rounds, respectively. Only half of the dermatologists surveyed reported using a checklist for the management of psoriasis. The final checklist comprised 19, 5, 6, and 9 items pertaining to patient history; physical exam and history of systemic therapy; vaccinations; and lab investigations and bloodwork, respectively. Conclusions: Given the increasing availability and complexity of biologic agents for psoriasis treatment, there is a need to promote standardized documentation for this population. The Checklist for the Systemic Treatment of Psoriasis presents 38 items that should be considered when initiating patients with psoriasis on biologic therapy.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS)/acne inversa is a debilitating chronic disease that remains poorly understood and difficult to manage. Clinical practice is variable, and there is a need for international, evidence‐based and easily applicable consensus on HS management. We report here the findings of a systematic literature review, which were subsequently used as a basis for the development of international consensus recommendations for the management of patients with HS. A systematic literature review was performed for each of nine clinical questions in HS (defined by an expert steering committee), covering comorbidity assessment, therapy (medical, surgical and combinations) and response to treatment. Included articles underwent data extraction and were graded according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence‐based Medicine criteria. Evidence‐based recommendations were then drafted, refined and voted upon, using a modified Delphi process. Overall, 5310 articles were screened, 171 articles were analysed, and 65 were used to derive recommendations. These articles included six randomized controlled trials plus cohort studies and case series. The highest level of evidence concerned dosing recommendations for topical clindamycin in mild disease (with systemic tetracyclines for more frequent/widespread lesions) and biologic therapy (especially adalimumab) as second‐line agents (following conventional therapy failure). Good‐quality evidence was available for the hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response (HiSCR) as a dichotomous outcome measure in inflammatory areas under treatment. Lower‐level evidence supported recommendations for topical triclosan and oral zinc in mild‐to‐moderate HS, systemic clindamycin and rifampicin in moderate HS and intravenous ertapenem in selected patients with more severe disease. Intralesional or systemic steroids may also be considered. Local surgical excision is suggested for mild‐to‐moderate HS, with wide excision for more extensive disease. Despite a paucity of good‐quality data on management decisions in HS, this systematic review has enabled the development of robust and easily applicable clinical recommendations for international physicians based on graded evidence.

Summary Background Weekly adalimumab (Humira®) is approved for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) based on the 12‐week placebo‐controlled periods of the two phase III PIONEER trials. Objectives Using PIONEER integrated trial results, we aimed to evaluate the optimal medium‐term adalimumab maintenance dosing strategy for moderate‐to‐severe HS. Methods Each trial had two double‐blind periods; 12‐week Period A and 24‐week Period B. Patients randomized to adalimumab 40 mg every week (ADAew) (Period A), were rerandomized in Period B to ADAew (ADAew/ew), ADA every other week (ADAew/eow), or placebo (ADAew/pbo). Placebo‐randomized patients were reassigned in Period B to ADAew (PIONEER I) or placebo (PIONEER II). The primary outcome was HS Clinical Response (HiSCR). Patients who lost response during Period B were discontinued from the study and offered an option to enter the open‐label extension (OLE) to receive ADAew. Results are reported across the two study periods, and data were combined from the two study periods and the OLE. Results For week‐12 HiSCR achievers, the HiSCR week‐36 rate was 48·1% (ADAew/ew) vs. 46·2% (ADAew/eow) and 32·1% (ADAew/pbo). Combining (post hoc) these patients with week‐12 partial responders further differentiated outcomes in Period B (ADAew/ew 55·7% vs. ADAew/eow 40·0% and ADAew/pbo 30·1%). Period‐B adverse‐event rates were ADAew/ew 59·6% vs. ADAew/eow 57·4% and ADAew/pbo 65·0%. One patient (ADAew/ew) reported a serious infection. Conclusions Weekly adalimumab treatment, effective throughout 36 weeks, was the optimal maintenance medium‐term dosing regimen for this population. At least partial response after 12 weeks with continued weekly dosing had better outcomes than dose reduction or interruption. Patients who do not show at least a partial response to weekly adalimumab by week 12 are unlikely to benefit from continued therapy. No new safety risks were identified. What's already known about this topic? Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease, commonly misinterpreted as an infection and treated with long‐term antibiotic regimens or surgical incisions.Based on the chronicity of HS and the lack of evidence for efficacious and safe long‐term HS treatments, it is important to evaluate medium‐ to long‐term therapies for HS.Weekly adalimumab (Humira®) is approved for the treatment of moderate‐to‐severe HS based on the two phase III PIONEER trials. What does this study add? This study pooled data from the two PIONEER trials, providing a more robust assessment of outcomes.After at least partial treatment success with weekly adalimumab short‐term therapy (12 weeks), continuing weekly dosing during the subsequent 24 weeks had better outcomes than dose reduction or treatment interruption.Patients who do not show at least a partial response to weekly adalimumab by week 12 are unlikely to benefit from continued therapy., Linked Comment: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18437. https://www.bjdonline.com/article/adalimumab-medium-term-dosing-strategy-in-moderate-to-severe-hidradenitis-suppurativa-integrated-results-from-the-phase-iii-randomized-placebo-controlled-pioneer-t/

Introduction: Many international guidelines for management of psoriasis exist and most have variations in grading evidence quality, strength of recommendations, and dosing. The objective of our review is to compare international guidelines published in the United Kingdom, Canada, Europe, and the United States for the management of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Methods: We conducted a literature review on systemic therapies and phototherapy for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in adult patients. The British, Canadian, European, and American guidelines served as the key comparators in our review. To identify relevant supporting clinical trials not referenced in the guidelines, we conducted literature searches in PubMed and EMBASE. Two authors independently extracted data on indications, dosing, efficacy, evidence grade, and strength of clinical recommendation for each therapy. Results: Monoclonal antibodies directed toward tumour necrosis factor and interleukin (IL)-12/23 received the strongest recommendations for treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, supported by robust, high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Newer agents such as IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors are not referenced in most guidelines. There are fewer RCTs for conventional therapies and few head-to-head comparisons with biologics, making it difficult to draw direct comparisons. Among older agents, methotrexate is most strongly recommended for long-term maintenance and cyclosporine is recommended for short-term control of flares. Conclusion: Physicians should individualize psoriasis-management strategies based on medication tolerance, efficacy, safety, patient comorbidities, availability of the medication, and patient preference.

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, pruritic inflammatory skin disease resulting from defects in skin barrier and aberrant immune responses. AD significantly affects the quality of life. Not all patients respond to topical therapies, and often systemic therapy is required to control the disease. Objective: To review the treatment options for adult AD patients including those options for patients who do not respond adequately or have contraindications to oral systemic therapy. Methods: A working group of clinicians with experience managing AD was convened to review the current literature on treatment options for adult AD patients. This review is based on the best available evidence from a published systematic review and an additional literature search. Results: Current treatments for AD are reviewed, including options for adult AD patients who do not respond or have contraindications to current systemic therapies. A new approach with targeted therapies is reviewed based on best available evidence. Conclusion: Many AD patients respond satisfactorily to topical or systemic treatments, but for those patients who do not respond or have contraindications, new biologic agents appear to be promising therapies.

Psoriasis and anxiety are chronic conditions with significant morbidity and there is evidence that they may exacerbate one another. There is little data on the prevalence of anxiety in psoriasis and the effect of psoriasis treatment on comorbid anxiety. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature to describe the prevalence and severity of clinical anxiety disorders or anxiety symptoms among adult patients with psoriasis and characterize the effect of anti-psoriatic interventions on clinical anxiety disorders or anxiety symptoms. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database using search terms 'psoriasis' and 'anxiety'. Results were tabulated and verified by two independent reviewers. Meta-analyses were not performed due to heterogeneity of data. Of 213 publications identified, 938 194 patients from 15 papers were included. The mean age ranged from 31.9-59.4 years old, with a mean PASI score of 7.65-22.8 (reported by nine studies) and a body surface area involvement of 25.9-39.8% (reported by two studies). The prevalence of anxiety in patients with psoriasis was 7-48%, which was significantly higher than healthy controls in two of three studies (HR 1.29-1.31, P = 0.001 and OR 2.91 [95% CI, 2.01-4.21], P < 0.001). Four of five studies (n = 2029) demonstrated an improvement in anxiety symptoms with psoriasis treatment. This review demonstrates a high prevalence of anxiety of adult patients with psoriasis suggesting that patients would benefit from systematic screening. Although the data suggest that anxiety may be improved through various psoriasis treatments, larger prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm this effect.