Search

Julio Pascual,1 Titte R Srinivas,2 Steven Chadban,3 Franco Citterio,4 Federico Oppenheimer,5 Helio Tedesco,6 Mitchell L Henry,7 Christophe Legendre,8 Yoshihiko Watarai,9 Claudia Sommerer,10 Po-Chang Lee,11 J Mark Hexham,12 Gaohong Dong,12 Peter Bernhardt,13 Flavio Vincenti14 1Nephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; 2Division of Nephrology, Medical University of South Carolina, Mt Pleasant, SC, USA; 3Department of Transplantation, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; 4Centro Trapianti d'Organo Istituto di Clinica Chirurgica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli, Rome, Italy; 5Renal Transplant Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; 6Nephrology Division, Hospital do Rim, UNIFESP, São Paulo, Brazil; 7The Comprehensive Transplant Center, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA; 8Service de Transplantation Adultes, Université Paris Descartes and Hôpital Necker, Paris, France; 9Department of Transplant Surgery, Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital, Nagoya City, Aich, Japan; 10Medizinische Klinik, Sektion Nephrologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; 11Medical College, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan; 12Biometrics and Statistical Science, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ, USA; 13Research and Development, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland; 14Kidney Transplant Service, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA Abstract: Two well defined, modifiable risk factors for kidney allograft failure are acute rejection and poor graft function at one year post-transplant. Regulatory bodies and expert panels in the USA and Europe have recognized that both acute rejection and one-year graft function should be assessed when evaluating immunosuppressive regimens. TRANSFORM (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01950819) is one of the first trials to adopt this approach and the first that applies a novel combined clinically meaningful endpoint to take the first step towards changing the paradigm for immunosuppression in kidney transplant patients. Everolimus with reduced-exposure calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) therapy is a strategy designed to reduce the risk of chronic nephrotoxicity and other dose-dependent complications associated with CNI therapy. In TRANSFORM, de novo kidney transplant patients are randomized to everolimus with reduced-exposure CNI, or mycophenolic acid with standard-exposure CNI, both with induction therapy and maintenance steroids. The primary endpoint is a composite of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection or estimated glomerular filtration rate ,50 mL/min/1.73 m2 at month 12 post-transplant, which is expected to be sensitive both to the effects of acute and chronic allograft rejection and nephrotoxic side effects of immunosuppressive therapies. The construct of this endpoint allows the integration of a continuous outcome (graft function) with a logistic outcome (rejection). The trial uses a randomized, multicenter, open-label, two-arm design. After completion of a 2-year core study, patients enter a further 3-year prospective observational study. By capturing follow-up to 5 years, TRANSFORM will provide substantial data on the incidence of graft loss, graft dysfunction, cancer, cardiovascular events, and other patient-relevant outcomes. TRANSFORM will determine whether de novo CNI reduction with an everolimus-based regimen achieves short-term outcomes compared with standard CNI. As the largest clinical trial undertaken to date in kidney transplantation, recruiting more than 2,000 patients, and with extended follow-up to 5 years, TRANSFORM will provide critical data required to help maximize long-term outcomes. Keywords: mTOR inhibitor, calcineurin inhibitor, reduced exposure

Objective Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma ( PLC) is a subtype of breast cancer with unique morphological features, but it remains controversial whether PLC should be considered an independent disease entity. The aim of this study was to illustrate cytopathological characteristics of PLC in comparison with other lobular carcinoma variants. Methods We investigated clinicopathological features of PLC ( n = 11) compared with those of other variants of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC, non- PLC) ( n = 32). Histological variants of the non- PLC group consisted of classic ( n = 25), solid ( n = 2), alveolar ( n = 1) and a tubulolobular type ( n = 4). A review of cytological reports and fine needle aspiration ( FNA) smear samples was performed for the PLC ( n = 9) and non- PLC ( n = 27) groups. Results : Patients with PLC were older, and had a higher nuclear grade and a higher incidence of axillary lymph node metastasis and triple negative phenotype than non- PLC patients ( P = 0.007, P < 0.001, P = 0.02 and P < 0.001, respectively). Cytological findings in PLC included medium- to large-sized nuclei, prominent nucleoli, a moderate-to-severe degree of pleomorphism, apocrine change and background necrosis, none of which were evident in the smears of the non- PLC group ( P < 0.001, P = 0.002, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.03, respectively). Despite these differences, patients with PLC and non- PLC showed similar clinical outcomes in our follow-up period. Conclusions Based on our results, a cytological diagnosis of PLC should be proposed if there are moderate- to large-sized nuclei, prominent nucleoli, a moderate-to severe degree of nuclear pleomorphism, apocrine change and necrosis in the background in FNA biopsy samples. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]