Search

Background: Obtaining reliable and valid information on resident performance is critical to patient safety and training program improvement. The goals were to characterize important anesthesia resident performance gaps that are not typically evaluated, and to further validate scores from a multiscenario simulation-based assessment., Methods: Seven high-fidelity scenarios reflecting core anesthesiology skills were administered to 51 first-year residents (CA-1s) and 16 third-year residents (CA-3s) from three residency programs. Twenty trained attending anesthesiologists rated resident performances using a seven-point behaviorally anchored rating scale for five domains: (1) formulate a clear plan, (2) modify the plan under changing conditions, (3) communicate effectively, (4) identify performance improvement opportunities, and (5) recognize limits. A second rater assessed 10% of encounters. Scores and variances for each domain, each scenario, and the total were compared. Low domain ratings (1, 2) were examined in detail., Results: Interrater agreement was 0.76; reliability of the seven-scenario assessment was r = 0.70. CA-3s had a significantly higher average total score (4.9 ± 1.1 vs. 4.6 ± 1.1, P = 0.01, effect size = 0.33). CA-3s significantly outscored CA-1s for five of seven scenarios and domains 1, 2, and 3. CA-1s had a significantly higher proportion of worrisome ratings than CA-3s (chi-square = 24.1, P < 0.01, effect size = 1.50). Ninety-eight percent of residents rated the simulations more educational than an average day in the operating room., Conclusions: Sensitivity of the assessment to CA-1 versus CA-3 performance differences for most scenarios and domains supports validity. No differences, by experience level, were detected for two domains associated with reflective practice. Smaller score variances for CA-3s likely reflect a training effect; however, worrisome performance scores for both CA-1s and CA-3s suggest room for improvement.

Background: Although women comprise an increasing proportion of US medical school faculty, they are underrepresented at higher ranks. Lack of effective mentoring may contribute to this disparity. We examined the role of academic rank, research focus, parenting, and part-time work on mentoring importance, needs, and gaps., Methods: In 2009, women faculty members of Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Dental Medicine were invited by e-mail to participate in a 28-item structured questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and adjusted logistic regressions were used to identify relevant themes., Results: Of the 1179 women faculty who responded, 54% had a mentor, and 72% without a mentor desired mentoring. The most important mentor characteristic identified was availability. Respondents endorsed most mentoring areas as important (range 51%-99%); 52% of respondents identified mentoring gaps (area important and unmet) in developing and achieving career goals and negotiation skills. Interest in mentorship for skills needed for advancement (research and lecturing skills and getting national recognition) was significantly associated with lower rank. Assistant professors were most likely to identify mentoring related to writing and publishing articles, whereas associate professors identified program development/strategic planning as important. Faculty who are parents identified gaps in finding collaborators and balancing work and family life., Conclusions: This survey identified a desire for both comprehensive and targeted mentoring to address gaps that varied by faculty rank, research focus, parenting, and work time status. Strategies to enhance mentoring should address career stages and include a structured framework for assessing mentoring gaps.

The Howard Hughes Medical Institute sponsored a workshop on laboratory chemical hoods on June 8, 9, and 10, 1998, that brought together 24 experts in the field of laboratory chemical hoods to critically assess the information known about hood performance. Workshop participants developed 31 consensus statements that reflect their collective views on the body of knowledge or lack thereof, for laboratory chemical hoods. The consensus statements fall into four broad categories: (1) hood selection, use, and operation; (2) hood and laboratory design issues; (3) ventilation system design issues; and (4) hood performance testing. The consensus statements include 26 statements on what is known and unknown about the performance of laboratory chemical hoods, 2 statements of definition, and 3 statements that reflect the participants' agreement not to agree. The brief commentary that follows each consensus statement provides guidance and recommendations.

Unlabelled: We prospectively studied 1035 individuals undergoing 1214 epidural steroid injections to determine the risk of hemorrhagic complications. A history of bruising or bleeding was present in 176 (15%) patients. A platelet count was assessed in 77 patients before the epidural steroid injection; none was less than 100 x 10(9)/L. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were reported by 383 (32%) patients, including 34 patients on multiple medications. Aspirin was the most common NSAID and was noted by 158 patients, including 104 patients on 325 mg or less per day. There were no spinal hematomas (major hemorrhagic complications). Blood was noted during needle or catheter placement in 63 (5.2%) patients (minor hemorrhagic complications). NSAIDs did not increase the frequency of minor hemorrhagic complications. However, increased age, needle gauge, needle approach, needle insertion at multiple interspaces, number of needle passes, volume of injectant, and accidental dural puncture were all significant risk factors for minor hemorrhagic complications. There were 42 patients with new neurologic symptoms or worsening of preexisting complaints that persisted more than 24 h after injection; median duration of the symptoms was 3 days (range, 1-20 days). Our results confirm those of previous studies performed in obstetric and surgical populations that document the safety of neuraxial techniques in patients receiving NSAIDs. We conclude that epidural steroid injection is safe in patients receiving aspirin-like antiplatelet medications. Minor worsening of neurologic function may occur after epidural steroid injection and must be differentiated from etiologies requiring intervention., Implications: Previous studies performed in obstetric and surgical populations have demonstrated that antiplatelet therapy does not increase the risk of spinal hematoma associated with spinal or epidural anesthesia and analgesia. We confirm the safety of epidural steroid injection in patients receiving aspirin-like medications.

Unlabelled: Discitis (inflammation of the intervertebral disk) most commonly develops as a rare complication of bacterial infection or chemical or mechanical irritation during spine surgery (1) with a postoperative incidence of 1%-2.8% (2). It is also a complication of discography-the intradiscal injection of saline or contrast material (3). The incidence of postdiscography discitis is 1%-4% (3); no cases have been reported when prophylactic antibiotics have been used, supporting the theory of bacterial contamination (3). Although it is controversial whether discitis can be caused by an aseptic or infectious process, recent data suggest that persistent discitis is almost always bacterial (4). Honan et al. (5) reported 16 cases of spontaneous discitis and reviewed another 52 patients from the literature. In their series, patients tended to have one or more comorbid conditions, such as diabetes, vertebral fracture, or a preexisting spine injury. Spontaneous discitis has also been associated with advanced age, IV drug abuse, IV access contamination, urinary tract infection, and immunocompromised states (5,6). No cases of infectious discitis associated with pregnancy and spinal anesthesia have been reported in the English literature. Discitis presents as spasmodic pain in the back that may be referred to the hips or groin (7). The pain may radiate to the lower extremities. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate is usually increased. Radiological changes in discitis include narrowing of the intervertebral disk space, vertebral sclerosis, and erosion of the end plates. The best diagnostic measure may be magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or a combination of bone and gallium scanning (2). The mainstay for discitis treatment is pain control and antibiotics; surgical intervention is usually not required. Complications of discitis include intervertebral fusion, epidural abscess, and paralysis., Implications: This is a case report of a disk infection (discitis) caused by the bacteria, Streptococcus bovis after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. S. bovis rarely causes discitis, and spinal anesthesia for labor and delivery has not been reported as a cause of discitis.

Pain is a common complaint in patients with autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease, and a systematic approach is needed to differentiate the etiology of the pain and define an approach to management. A thorough history is the best clue to the multifactorial causes of the pain, superimposed upon an understanding of the complex innervation network that supplies the kidneys. The appropriate use of diagnostic radiology (especially MRI) will assist in differentiating the mechanical low back pain caused by cyst enlargement, cyst rupture and cyst infection. Also, the increased incidence of uric acid nephrolithiasis as a factor in producing renal colic must be considered when evaluating acute pain in the population at risk. MRI is not a good technique to detect renal calculi, a frequent cause of pain in polycystic kidney disease. If stone disease is a possibility, then abdominal CT scan and/or ultrasound should be the method of radiologic investigation. Pain management is generally not approached in a systematic way in clinical practice because most physicians lack training in the principles of pain management. The first impulse to give narcotics for pain relief must be avoided. Since chronic pain cannot be "cured," an approach must include techniques that allow the patient to adapt to chronic pain so as to limit interference with their life style. A detailed stepwise approach for acute and chronic pain strategies for the patient with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease is outlined.

Background: Controlled-release (CR) morphine tablets have become routine therapy in the management of cancer pain. Compared with immediate-release (IR) morphine, this formulation provides the benefit of dosing every 12 hours., Methods: This study reviewed the 10 published, well controlled, repeated-dose, comparative studies with CR morphine tablets administered every 12 hours to patients with cancer pain., Results: CR morphine tablets were uniformly effective; 98% of patients completed a treatment course of every-12-hours therapy. Although the effective analgesic dose varied considerably from study to study (range, 90-330 mg per day), pain was well controlled with CR morphine tablets as the primary analgesic. Mean pain scores, converted to a common 10-point scale, ranged from 1.1-2.9 across all studies. There was only occasional need for IR morphine rescue medication (range, 2-39 mg per day). The mean discontinuation rate because of side effects or lack of every-12-hours efficacy was 2%. In seven studies that used IR morphine as the comparative agent, CR morphine tablets were found to be equally effective as IR morphine., Conclusions: Twice-daily dosing of CR morphine provides convenient, safe, and effective relief of cancer pain.

Objectives: Tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) have been shown to provide analgesia for a variety of neuropathic and headache pain syndromes regardless of the presence of depression. There is a high incidence of depression in patients with chronic pain, thereby making tricyclic antidepressants particularly suitable for chronic pain patients. We wanted to study patterns of use of tricyclic antidepressants in our Pain Management Center (Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, MA, U.S.A.) primarily to answer four questions: (1) What percentage of all patients were treated with tricyclic antidepressants? (2) How many patients were treated with each antidepressant, and what was the dose range used for individual antidepressants? (3) Were tricyclic antidepressants beneficial for chronic pain, and was that response dependent on a particular dose? (4) Did patients receive an adequate TCA trial, and what factors led to the discontinuation of a TCA trial?, Methods: A total of 1,145 pain clinic patient charts were reviewed in alphabetical sequence. A total of 282 patients were identified as being treated with tricyclic antidepressants. Data were obtained from these 282 charts regarding the patient's age, diagnosis, tricyclic antidepressant use and dose, other pain treatments, response to treatment, and side effects. The existing diagnosis of depression was documented if possible. Tricyclic antidepressant doses were defined as low doses when the equivalent of 50 mg or less of amitriptyline was used, and as full doses when the equivalent of at least 150 mg of amitriptyline was used. Response to treatment was noted as mild, moderate, or marked improvement. Patients reporting mild improvement were considered nonresponders., Results: Of 1,145 patients, 282 were treated with tricyclic antidepressants. A total of 205 (73%) of the patients were treated with low doses and only 34 (12%) with full doses. The remaining 43 (15%) received intermediate doses. Amitriptyline was the most commonly used drug (58%). Amitriptyline and doxepin appeared to be more effective than other tricyclic antidepressants. The rate of response to our treatment among the 31 patients with a coexisting diagnosis of depression was similar to the patients without documented depression. In patients with tricyclic antidepressants as the only treatment, there was only a trend toward greater response with full dose. In terms of side effects causing dose limitation or discontinuation of the drug, clomipramine, amitriptyline, and doxepin appeared to be worse than imipramine, desipramine, and nortriptyline., Conclusion: Tricyclic antidepressants were used in 25% of patients referred to a multidisciplinary pain center and were commonly used in low to intermediate doses, even in situations in which there were neither side effects nor optimal clinical response.

Under the auspices of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, a set of consensus guidelines for Radiation Protection Practices has been developed for biomedical research using radioactive materials. The purposes of the guidelines are (1) to promote good radiation protection practices consistent with the needs of biomedical research, the ALARA principle, and regulatory requirements; (2) to establish common goals and consistent practices within radiation safety programs; and (3) to build a meaningful partnership between radiation safety professionals and the biomedical research community. These practices are intended to enhance radiation protection and the efficiency of the research staff. The consensus guidelines will lessen the variability in radiation safety practices that is evident among many academic research institutions and will encourage better acceptance and regulatory compliance by users of radioactive materials in biomedical research.

The alteration of extracranial blood flow in conjunction with clinical signs of autonomic nervous system dysfunction have led to various explanations concerning the pathophysiology of migraine headache. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy, a painful disorder of the sympathetic nervous system, can be treated by blocking the sympathetic nerves located in the stellate ganglion, resulting in vasodilation, ptosis, miosis, and anhydrosis. In theory, these changes could trigger a migraine headache attack secondary to autonomic dysfunction reflecting an imbalance between sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems. This may be especially true in a patient with a previous history of meningitis that may have resulted in a disorder of cerebrovascular regulation. We report a 56-year-old man with no previous history of migraine who developed migraine with aura after a stellate ganglion block. These episodic headaches occurred with decreasing frequency and severity for over 6 months, with eventual complete resolution. This interesting phenomenon has not been reported in the English literature and may help to better understand the pathophysiology of migraine.

This review describes practical management techniques for pain associated with cancer and AIDS. Multi-disciplinary and multi-modality approaches are discussed.

Background: The objective of the survey was to assess the status of acute pain management in U.S. hospitals and attitudes of adults in the U.S. toward postoperative pain management, information that has not been previously available., Methods: Two telephone questionnaire surveys were conducted U.S. hospital participants, including 100 teaching hospitals (acute care hospitals with a residency program and/or university affiliation), 100 nonteaching (community) hospitals with fewer than 200 beds, and 100 nonteaching (community) hospitals with 200 beds or more were interviewed regarding current and future pain management programs and related topics. Adult participants in 500 U.S. households were interviewed on attitudes and experiences with postoperative pain and its management., Results: Forty-two percent of the hospitals have acute pain management programs, and an additional 13% have plans to establish an acute pain management program. Seventy-seven percent of adults believe that it is necessary to experience some pain after surgery. Fifty-seven percent of those who had surgery cited concern about pain after surgery as their primary fear experienced before surgery. Seventy-seven percent of adults reported pain after surgery, with 80% of these experiencing moderate to extreme pain., Conclusions: Despite a growing trend in pain management, increased professional and public awareness including the establishment of pain management programs and public and patient education is needed to reduce the incidence and severity of postoperative pain.

During 1984-85, laminectomy rates in Massachusetts demonstrated a 2.2-fold variation among districts. Thirty-five percent of laminectomies occurred in 7 of the 108 hospitals studied. Approximately 81% of laminectomies were performed by neurosurgeons. Rates of laminectomy decline with increasing age after 65, while rates of hospitalization for lower-back pain rise.

The models and analyses used in this study represent an important step in the continued search for the optimum use of surgery for the treatment of lower back pain. The likelihood of patients who are hospitalized with lower back pain in Massachusetts receiving either laminectomies or spinal fusions or both was increased when any of the following demographic, socioeconomic, or medical characteristics were present: white, male, well insured, young, routine admission, admitted to a medium-sized hospital, admitted to a teaching hospital, admitted to a hospital with a high occupancy rate, and discharged home.

MS Contin (controlled-release oral morphine) has been successfully used to treat moderate to severe pain associated with cancer. The indication for administering MS Contin is not a poor prognosis, but rather pain requiring repeated dosing with potent opioids over periods of more than a few days. Individualization of analgesic dosage to each patient's needs can provide excellent relief of pain in most patients but require selection of the right analgesic in the right dose at the right intervals.

A 31-year-old woman developed a disabling obturator neuropathy as a result of a difficult delivery. This was successfully diagnosed and treated by obturator nerve blocks with anesthetic and steroid at the obturator foramen.

The value of patient response to epidural steroid injection as a predictor of surgical outcome was studied. One hundred and eighty-seven patients with clinical signs of root compression underwent lumbar epidural steroid injection. Eighty-five of these patients had been told that an operation on the lumbar spine would be necessary. Over the ensuing one to three years, only 34 of these patients eventually required an operation upon the lumbar spine or an injection of chymopapain. Fifty-four per cent of the patients who were unimproved after epidural steroid injection were also unimproved after chymopapain whereas all patients who were improved, even transiently, after epidural steroid injection were improved after chymopapain injection. A statistical comparison of these two groups revealed the probability of these occurrences of 0.088. There was no correlation between outcome of open surgical procedures and response to epidural steroids. Epidural steroid injection may be a valuable aid to predicting the outcome of chemonucleolysis.