Search

A woman in her early 60s presented to the emergency room with worsening pain 10 days after an injury to her right abdomen. CT revealed a large subcutaneous haematoma and contained small bowel perforation. She was tachycardic and anaemic and her international normalized ratio (INR) was 2.6 on warfarin for atrial fibrillation. General surgery was consulted and percutaneous drainage of the perforation was recommended, requiring an INR of 1.5 or less. Intravenous (IV) phytonadione was administered to accelerate the lowering of INR; however, the patient developed a severe infusion-related reaction. She recovered once IV phytonadione was stopped and oral diphenhydramine was administered. However, there was still a need for warfarin reversal therapy. A 1.25 mg dose of oral phytonadione was trialled 2.5 hours later and well tolerated. An additional rechallenge of 5 mg by mouth was given without reaction (<8 hours after the initial reaction). Her INR was 1.5 the next morning., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: The incidence of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is reported to be <25 times lower than that of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary emboli, which occur in 70 to 270/100,000 cases in the general population. Current guidelines recommend initial treatment with therapeutic low-molecular-weight heparin followed by a transition to a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) in patients with cirrhosis who develop SVT without severe liver dysfunction. This, however, is based on observational data. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy in patients with cirrhosis who present with SVT and receive either a DOAC or a VKA., Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted from December 2021 to November 2022. Patients between the ages of 18 and 75 years with cirrhosis and acute SVT who received either a VKA or a DOAC between July 2019 and July 2021 were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was the efficacy of treatment, defined as a new thrombotic event. The secondary outcome was the safety of treatment, defined as the development of major bleeding. Readmission data were followed up at 6 and 10 months. Bivariate analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between the medication groups and each outcome and summarized as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical significance was set at 5% for all of the comparisons., Results: A total of 80 patients from 50 hospitals were included in this study. Sixty-one patients (59.02% male) received DOACs and 19 (57.89% male) received a VKA. Of the patients who received DOACs, 41 (67.21%) received apixaban, one (1.64%) received dabigatran, and 19 (31.15%) received rivaroxaban. The results from the bivariate analysis revealed no significant differences between DOACs and warfarin for both the efficacy (OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.44-4.84, P = 0.53) and safety outcomes (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.04-26.43, P = 1) at 10 months., Conclusions: The use of DOACs in patients with cirrhosis who present with SVT may be efficacious and safe compared with warfarin. The findings from our study may inform power analyses for well-conducted randomized trials to confirm these findings.

Background: Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are currently the mainstay treatment for preventing thrombosis-induced ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), or previous infarction. However, such management may potentially induce antithrombotic-associated intracranial hemorrhage, leading to significantly adverse clinical outcomes. To investigate the risk of spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) in patients under therapeutic anticoagulation., Methods: This retrospective cohort study used a database established by Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital to estimate the risk of first onset sICH in patients with AF, DVT or previous stroke who were 18 years old or older, and who had been on at least three months continuous long-term treatment with the oral anticoagulants aspirin, warfarin, or NOACs. In addition, we used propensity-score matching to minimize bias and Cox proportional hazards ratio to compare the risk of sICH among patients prescribed these anticoagulants., Results: We analyzed the data of 546 patients (182 aspirin users, 182 warfarin users, and 182 NOAC users). 180 (20 taking aspirin, 74 warfarin, and 86 NOACs) developed new onset sICH before seven years. No new onset cases were found after 7 years. Importantly, those taking NOACs were found to be at a higher risk of early onset hemorrhage (47.80 %) compared to the groups taking aspirin (11.10 %) and warfarin (47.80 %) with a median time-to-occurrence being 2.50, 4.00, and 4.40 years, respectively., Conclusions: Though NOACs prevented ischemic stroke, they were used with a higher risk of early onset spontaneous ICH at our large medical center., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None, (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Introduction: Surgery is often delayed in patients with proximal femoral fractures who receive oral anticoagulants, to avoid complications related to perioperative bleeding. However, surgery delay may increase the risk of postoperative mortality. Our primary goal was to understand whether anticoagulated patients benefit from early surgery in terms of survival and perioperative complications., Methods: This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study of 581,189 patients with proximal femoral fractures. About 2.0 % (n = 11,385) received direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) and 1.5 % (n = 8,726) received warfarin. Surgery was performed within 48 h in 37.6 % of DOAC patients, 27.6 % of warfarin patients and in 41.9 % of nonanticoagulated patients. Survival analysis was applied to compare mortality rate, blood transfusions, systemic complications and surgical complications during hospitalization between the study groups., Results: Patients receiving anticoagulation were older and had more comorbidities than patients without anticoagulation. There were overall similar rates of mortality (0.8 %, 1.1 % and 1.2 %) and surgical complications (2.1 %, 2.1 % and 2.2 %) in non-anticoagulated, DOAC and warfarin patients. Blood transfusions and systemic complications were higher in all anticoagulated patients regardless of surgery timing. There were comparable rates of early surgery (41.9 %, 37.6 % and 27.6 %, respectively). When operated early, DOAC patients had more surgical complications (OR=1.24, p = 0.04). Warfarin patients operated early had higher mortality (OR=1.48, p = 0.08) and higher risk of blood transfusions (OR=1.24, p < 0.001)., Discussion: Age and comorbidities could explain higher rates of postoperative systemic complications in anticoagulated patients. Nevertheless, overall short-term mortality was similar between the groups. Early surgery was associated with higher rates of surgical complications in DOAC patients. When operated early, patients receiving warfarin were at an increased risk of mortality (p = 0.08) and perioperative blood transfusions., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have shown comparable efficacy and a superior safety profile in clinical trials for patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, further study is needed to assess DOACs' effectiveness and safety compared to warfarin in a real-world context. Thus, this meta-analysis compares the effectiveness and safety of warfarin and DOACs in patients with VTE., Method: A systematic review of the literature using PubMed and EMBASE was conducted from inception until June 2024. We examined observational studies that compared safety and effectiveness between DOACs and warfarin when used in treating VTE and reported adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and/or odds ratios (ORs) for recurrent VTE, major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and death from any cause. We then estimated the pooled effect using the random-effects model for meta-analysis., Results: A total of 25 studies were included in the current meta-analysis. DOAC therapy was associated with significantly lower risks of recurrent VTE (HR 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-0.85), major bleeding (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.72-0.83), clinically relevant non-major bleeding (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.77-0.88), and gastrointestinal bleeding (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.68-0.83) compared to warfarin. However, no statistically significant difference was observed in all-cause mortality between the two groups (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.83-1.10)., Conclusion: This meta-analysis found that DOACs are associated with a significant reduction in VTE recurrence in addition to the known favorable safety profile when compared to warfarin., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Background: Prophylactic dose of rivaroxaban is often used in treatment of isolated calf muscle vein thrombosis (ICMVT); nevertheless, its effect is less reported. This study aims to evaluate short-term outcomes in patients with ICMVT who received prophylactic dose of rivaroxaban or warfarin therapy., Methods: A retrospective analysis of 472 ICMVT patients who received 2 different treatment regimens was undertaken. Propensity score matching method was used to balance the confounding effect of baseline clinical data. Chi-squared test and logistic regression analysis were used to compare outcomes (venous thromboembolism events, bleeding events, complete clot resolution) according to the type of treatment regimens before and after propensity score matching. Univariate and multivariable analysis were used to investigate risk factors for incomplete clot resolution of ICMVT after propensity score matching., Results: 242 ICMVT patients received prophylactic dose of rivaroxaban (rivaroxaban group, RG), and 230 received warfarin (warfarin group, WG). After propensity score matching, 156 patients were included in each group; Venous thromboembolism (VTE) events occurred in 14 (9.0%) patients in the RG and 10 (6.4%) in the WG (P = 0.395); no major bleeding events occurred in each group, and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events occurred in 5 (3.2%) patients in the RG and 10 (6.4%) in the WG (P = 0.186); complete clot resolution at 3 months occurred in 80 (51.3%) patients in the RG and 100 (64.1%) in the WG (P = 0.022). Logistic regression analysis showed that there were no significant differences between RG and WG in VTE events (odds ratio 1.439, 95% confidence interval 0.619-3.347, P = 0.397) and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events (odds ratio 0.483, 95% confidence interval 0.161-1.449, P = 0.194); it revealed that complete clot resolution rate at 3 months was different in the 2 groups (odds ratio 0.589, 95% confidence interval 0.375-0.928, P = 0.022). Treatment regimens (prophylactic dose of rivaroxaban), thrombosis (maximum diameter >7 mm), and risk factors for VTE (nonsurgery risk factors, mainly referring to active malignancy) were risk factors for incomplete clot resolution of ICMVT (P < 0.05)., Conclusions: In this retrospective study with a short-term follow-up, ICMVT patients who received prophylactic dose of rivaroxaban had no significant differences in VTE and bleeding events compared to those who received warfarin therapy (the overall INR >2.0 for >50% of the time); but it was not conducive to complete clot resolution., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Treatment of isolated and non-obstructive atherosclerotic coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is still controversial., Aim: To assess the efficacy and safety of vitamin-K antagonist (VKA) versus dual antiplatelet (DAPT) therapy in management of patients with isolated and non-obstructive atherosclerotic CAE., Methods: We prospectively enrolled 79 patients diagnosed on elective coronary angiography to have either isolated CAE or non-obstructive atherosclerotic CAE. Patients were assigned in 1:1 pattern to receive either VKA (warfarin) or DAPT (aspirin plus clopidogrel). Patients were followed-up for nine-months. The primary endpoint was the cumulative events rate including acute coronary event, target vessel intervention, or cardiac death. Analysis of cumulative events at different time intervals, its individual components, and bleeding were considered secondary endpoints., Results: Cumulative events rate was 33%, with mortality rate of 2.5%. Both treatment groups showed comparable cumulative events during the nine-months follow-up duration. Nevertheless, Kaplan-Meier analysis beyond the first 3-months of follow-up showed significantly higher event-free survival among the VKA-group. Recurrent events (≥2) were significantly higher among the DAPT-group. Both groups showed no major bleeding events. Multivariable cox-regression analysis showed that presence of significant coronary tortuosity, use of DAPT in reference to VKA, and lower percent time in therapeutic range (%TTR) among those receiving VKA were significant independent predictors of clinical adverse events beyond the first 3-months of follow-up., Conclusion: Cumulative adverse events were comparable among both treatment groups for isolated non-obstructive CAE. However, adverse events were significantly more frequent in the DAPT-group beyond the first three months., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest No relationships that could be construed as a conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Limited data exist on the safety and effectiveness of using direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation aged 80 years or more with and without low bodyweight (LBW)., Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of using DOACs in this population compared with warfarin., Methods: This retrospective active comparator new-user cohort study included veteran patients with atrial fibrillation who were newly initiated on either warfarin or DOACs between January 1, 2015, and January 1, 2021. The primary outcome was incidence of major bleeding and ischemic stroke. All outcomes were compared between treatment groups in 2 propensity score-matched cohorts of patients aged 80 years older with (AW) and without LBW (age-only cohort). Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs)., Results: Matched AW and age-only cohorts included 493 and 11 909 patients, respectively, in each of the DOAC and warfarin exposure groups. Greater than 90% were male, with a mean age of ∼87 years. The rate of major bleeding was lower in the DOAC group compared with warfarin in both the AW (aHR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46-0.87) and age-only cohorts (aHR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.49-0.77). A significantly lower rate of ischemic stroke occurred in the DOAC group compared with warfarin in the AW cohort (aHR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.45-0.84) and age-only cohort (aHR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.58-0.68)., Conclusion: DOAC use was associated with lower risk of major bleeding and ischemic stroke compared with warfarin in patients aged 80 years or older with and without LBW., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests There are no competing interests to disclose. The results of this study do not represent the views of the federal government or the Veterans Health Administration., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Current guidelines recommend direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who have a bioprosthetic valve (BPV). However, the data related to elderly patients (aged ≥80 years) with BPV replacement and AF are limited., Methods: This post-hoc subgroup analysis of a BPV-AF Registry enrolled 752 patients with BPV replacement and AF. The primary net outcome was a composite of cardiac death, stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, and cardiovascular events., Results: Among 752 patients, 429 (57%) patients were ≥ 80 and 323 (43%) were < 80 years old. The higher risk in patients aged ≥80 than <80 years was significant for the net outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-3.17; P = 0.001). After adjustment for confounders, there was no statistically significant difference between warfarin (reference) and DOAC users in the risk of net outcomes (adjusted HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.71-2.24; P = 0.44), stroke and systemic embolism (adjusted HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 0.48-8.38; P = 0.34), and major bleeding (adjusted HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.11-4.98; P = 0.75) in patients aged ≥80 years old as well as those aged <80 years. Among 489 warfarin users, the cumulative incidence of net outcomes tended to be higher in patients aged ≥80 than <80 years (12.2% vs. 5.7% at 1 year, log-rank P = 0.002). Among 263 DOAC users, however, it was similar between patients aged ≥80 and < 80 years., Conclusions: The present study demonstrated that DOAC showed similar efficacy and safety compared with warfarin even in elderly patients aged ≥80 years with BPV replacement and AF., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The optimal design for pharmacoepidemiologic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) studies is unclear. Using the association between concomitant use of sulfonylureas and warfarin and the risk of severe hypoglycemia as a case study, a DDI with little or no clinical impact, we tested whether the prevalent new-user design can be applied in the area., Methods: Among all patients initiating sulfonylureas in the UK's Clinical Practice Research Datalink (1998-2020), we identified those adding-on warfarin while on a sulfonylurea. For each co-exposed patient, we defined a prescription-based exposure set including other sulfonylurea users not adding-on warfarin (comparators). Within each exposure set, we matched each co-exposed patient to five comparators on time-conditional propensity scores (TCPS) and followed them using an as-treated approach. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of severe hypoglycemia associated with concomitant use of sulfonylureas and warfarin compared to use of sulfonylureas alone. Sensitivity analyses addressed the impact of different potential sources of bias., Results: The study cohort included 17 890 patients co-exposed to sulfonylureas and warfarin and 88 749 matched comparators. After TCPS matching, patient characteristics were well-balanced between groups. Compared to use of sulfonylureas alone, concomitant use of sulfonylureas and warfarin was not associated with the risk of severe hypoglycemia (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.92-1.17). Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the primary analysis (HRs ranging from 1.01 to 1.15, all not statistically significant)., Conclusions: Our study suggests that the prevalent new-user design could be used for the assessment of clinical effects of DDIs., (© 2024 The Author(s). Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Congenital portosystemic shunts (CPSS) are rare congenital abnormalities causing abnormal blood flow between the portal vein and systemic circulation. This study reports on the peri-operative anticoagulation management of CPSS patients post closure, focusing on the incidence of thrombotic and bleeding complications., Methods: This is a single-center retrospective analysis of CPSS patients who underwent surgery or endovascular intervention between 2005 and 2021. The protocol included unfractionated heparin (UFH) during and immediately after surgery, followed by either warfarin or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) postoperatively. Outcomes assessed included postoperative thrombotic and bleeding complications., Results: A total of 44 patients were included. Postoperatively, 89% received treatment-dose UFH, transitioning to warfarin or LMWH at discharge. Thrombotic complications occurred in 16% of patients, predominantly in the superior mesenteric vein. Surgical interventions and continuous infusion of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) were used for clot resolution. Bleeding complications were observed in 64% of patients, primarily managed with transfusions and temporary UFH interruption. No deaths related to thrombotic, or bleeding events were reported., Conclusions: Our findings underscore the delicate balance required in anticoagulation management for CPSS patients, revealing an occurrence of both thrombotic and bleeding complications postoperatively., Levels of Evidence: Level II, retrospective study., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest None of the authors have financial disclosures related to the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

It remains unclear whether non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are more effective and safer than warfarin in low-weight patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Here, we retrospectively compared the effectiveness and safety of NOACs with those of warfarin in low-weight patients with AF. We extracted the July 2011-September 2022 data of patients with AF treated with a NOAC (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban) or warfarin at a tertiary hospital. The patients were divided into low-weight (body weight ≤ 60 kg) and non-low-weight (body weight = 60-100 kg) groups. The primary outcomes were hospitalization for ischemic stroke (IS) or systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding, whereas the secondary outcomes were any ischemic and bleeding events. We used the inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance the baseline characteristics between the groups. In total, 5,044 patients (mean age = 73.7 years, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score = 3.0, mean HAS-BLED score = 2.3) were enrolled and divided into low-weight and non-low-weight groups-containing 1,666 (1,406 NOAC users, 260 warfarin users) and 3,378 (2,978 NOAC users, 400 warfarin users) patients, respectively. NOACs were associated with a lower risk of any bleeding event in the low-weight group (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.61, 95% confidence interval = 0.51-0.73). The between-group differences in the risks of IS/SE, any ischemic event, major bleeding, and any bleeding event were nonsignificant. Thus, the use of NOACs (specifically dabigatran or edoxaban) is associated with a lower risk of any bleeding event than warfarin use in low-weight patients with AF., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have overtaken warfarin in the treatment of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Limited data explore the safety of DOACs in obesity., Methods: This multicenter retrospective study between June 2015 and September 2019 uses the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative (MAQI 2 ) registry to compare DOACs and warfarin across weight classes (not obese: body mass index (BMI) ⩾ 18.5 and < 30; obese: BMI ⩾ 30 and < 40; severely obese: BMI ⩾ 40). Primary outcomes include major, clinically relevant nonmajor (CRNM), and minor bleeding events per 100 patient-years. Secondary outcomes include stroke, recurrent VTE, and all-cause mortality., Results: DOACs were prescribed to 49% of the 4089 patients with AF and 46% of the 3162 patients with VTE. Compared to patients treated with warfarin, those treated with DOACs had a higher estimated glomerular filtration rate across BMI categories regardless of indication. In the AF population, severely obese patients treated with DOACs had more major (3.4 vs 1.8, p = 0.004), CRNM (8.6 vs 5.9, p = 0.019), and minor bleeding (11.4 vs 9.9, p = 0.001). There was no difference in stroke or all-cause mortality. In the VTE population, both CRNM (7.5 vs 6.7, p = 0.042) and minor bleeding (19.3 vs 10.5, p < 0.001) events occurred at higher rates in patients treated with DOACs. There was no difference in recurrent pulmonary embolism, stroke, or all-cause mortality., Conclusion: There is a higher rate of bleeding in severely obese patients with VTE and AF treated with DOACs compared to warfarin, without a difference in secondary outcomes. Further studies to compare the anticoagulant classes and understand bleeding drivers in this population are needed., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Dr Geoffery Barnes reports research funding from Boston Scientific; consulting for Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Janssen, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Anthos, Abbott Vascular, and Boston Scientific; and he serves on the Board of Directors for the Anticoagulation (AC) Forum. Dr Scott Kaatz reports research funding from Janssen, BMS, Osmosis Research, National Institutes of Health, and Bayer; consulting for Janssen, Pfizer, BMS, AstraZeneca, Gilead, Phase Bio, Boston Scientific, Inari, and Anthos; and Board membership for AC Forum, National Blood Clot Alliance Medical and Scientific Advisory Board, and PERT Consortium. Dr James Froelich reports research funding from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and FMD Society of America. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest.

Direct oral anticoagulant drugs (DOACs) are available in addition to warfarin for the treatment of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Anticoagulants are useful for practical pharmacotherapy in Asian populations, but their responses are different from those in Caucasian populations. Therefore, we aimed to identify the most useful anticoagulant using a nationwide insurance claims database in Japan. We extracted information on patients with NVAF treated with DOACs or warfarin for the first time between September 2015 and February 2018 to conduct a retrospective observational cohort study using the claims database of Japan. We calculated hazard ratios (HR) of effectiveness and safety endpoints among DOACs or warfarin after adjusting for backgrounds by propensity scores (inverse probability weighting). Using negative control outcomes, we considered renal function as an unmeasured confounding factor. After adjusting for their backgrounds, patients treated with DOACs showed higher effectiveness endpoints (stroke or systemic embolism) than those treated with warfarin (HR; 0.72-0.81) and higher safety in terms of safety end points (clinically significant bleeding) (HR; 0.80-0.88). The net clinical benefit, which reflects the actual clinical usefulness, indicates the advantages of DOACs over warfarin (HR; 0.75-0.82). Dabigatran had lower usefulness than edoxaban and rivaroxaban in Japanese patients treated with NVAF, even after considering the unmeasured confounding factor of kidney function. Based on practical clinical data, edoxaban and rivaroxaban were the most useful anticoagulants in Japanese patients with NVAF., (© 2024 The Author(s). Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2024 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Introduction: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and concomitant moderate-to-severe mitral stenosis (MS) are listed as a contraindicated population to direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) because of the traditional tenet of high stroke risk, despite scarce evidence. With accumulating data, we sought to conduct a systematic meta-analysis to preliminarily explore the efficacy and safety of DOAC versus warfarin in patients with AF and concomitant significant MS., Methods: We searched the Medline, Embase databases, and the Cochrane Library (assessed October 10th, 2022) for eligible studies. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were synthesized in Stata 16.1 (StataCorp)., Results: In random-effects meta-analyses, DOACs demonstrated a similar risk of stroke or systemic embolism (RR 0.51; 95% CI 0.09-2.96), all-cause death (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.35-1.87), major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.24-1.39), and silent cerebral ischemia (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.64-1.58) when compared with warfarin., Conclusions: DOACs were similar to warfarin in the efficacy and safety profiles in patients with AF and concomitant significant MS. Future evidence is expected from other large trials., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome-associated venous thromboembolism (APS-VTE) remain uncertain. We aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of DOACs in patients with APS-VTE., Methods: Using the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database, we retrospectively identified all APS-VTE cases. We examined the VTE recurrence, arterial thrombosis, death and bleeding in patients who received DOACs compared with warfarin for therapeutic anticoagulation., Results: Of all the VTE cases (n = 84,916) detected between 2014 and 2018, patients with APS-VTE (n = 410) accounted for 0.48%. Most patients with APS-VTE (73%) were aged < 60 years. The recurrent VTE occurred in 8 of 209 patients (3.8%) who received DOACs and in 7 of 201 (3.5%) who received warfarin (relative risk [RR], 1.099; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-2.98; P = 1.000). The arterial thrombosis (ATE) occurred in 8 of 209 patients (3.8%) who received DOAC and in 20 of 201 (10%) who received warfarin (RR, 0.385; 95% CI, 0.17-0.85; P = 0.024). The composite outcomes of VTE recurrence, ATE, or mortality were significantly lower in patients (9.1%) on DOAC than in those (16.3%) on warfarin (RR, 0.537; 95% CI, 0.32-0.91; P = 0.028). The bleeding outcome occurred in 7 of 209 (3.4%) patients in the DOACs group and 7 of 201 (3.5%) patients in the warfarin group (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.34-2.69; P = 0.840)., Conclusion: In patients with APS-VTE, DOACs group showed comparable rates of recurrent VTE, bleeding, and deaths, but a significantly lower incidence of ATE and composite outcomes compared with the warfarin group in Korea., Competing Interests: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose., (© 2024 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.)

Introduction: Several randomised controlled trials have demonstrated that novel oral anticoagulants are safer compared with vitamin K antagonists for the management of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) to prevent thromboembolic events in the general population. There is a growing interest in the use of apixaban in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) but there is a lack of randomised data in this population., Methods and Analysis: APIDP2 is a prospective parallel, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint trial involving patients with ESRD undergoing chronic PD who have NVAF. A total of 178 participants will be recruited from 20 French PD centres. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to receive either apixaban at a reduced dose of 2.5 mg two times per day (dose determined with the previous pharmacokinetic study APIDP1) or dose-adjusted to international normalised ratio (INR) target (2-3) coumadin therapy. Anticoagulation to prevent thromboembolic events will be initiated or changed according to the randomisation for a duration of 1 year. The primary outcome is a major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding from randomisation up to month 12, assessed according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Score. Secondary outcomes encompass an efficacy composite criterion combining stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), cardiovascular death and thrombosis including myocardial infarction cumulated at 12 months. Bleeding events will be also classified according to Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO) and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) criteria and pharmacodynamics outcomes will evaluate the time within the INR target range of 2-3 in the warfarin arm over 1 year, and anti-Xa apixaban activity in case of bleeding events and at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months of follow-up in the apixaban arm. To demonstrate that apixaban is safer than warfarin at 1 year, assuming two interim analyses after 60 and 118 patients, a bilateral alpha risk of 5% and a power of 80%, 178 patients are needed in this randomised trial (effect size found from the Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE) Study among patients with creatinine clearance 25-30 ml/min), that is, 89 patients per group., Ethics and Dissemination: The study has been approved by the ethics committee Comité de Protection des Personnes Sud Est III - Lyon - FRANCE, CT number 2023-507544-37-00. Written informed consent is required for each participant. Findings will be presented at scientific meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06045858; European Clinical Trial System, CT number 2023-507544-37-00., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Warfarin, with its narrow therapeutic range, requires the understanding of various influencing factors for personalized medication. Vascular senescence, marked by vascular stiffening and endothelial dysfunction, has an unclear effect on the efficacy and safety of warfarin. Based on previous studies, we hypothesized that vascular senescence increases the risk of bleeding during warfarin therapy. This study aimed to explore these effects using animal models and clinical cohorts. We established rat models of vascular senescence and calcification using d-galactose, vitamin D, and nicotine. After validating the models, we examined changes in the international normalized ratio (INR) at fixed warfarin doses (0.20 and 0.35 mg/kg). We found that vascular senescence caused significantly elevated INR values and increased bleeding risk. In the prospective clinical cohort study (NCT06428110), hospitalized warfarin patients with standard dose adjustments were divided into vascular senescence and control groups based on ultrasound and computed tomography diagnosis. Using propensity score matching to exclude the influence of confounding factors, we found that the vascular senescence group had lower steady-state warfarin doses and larger dose adjustments, with a higher probability of INR exceeding the therapeutic range. The vascular senescence group tended to experience more bleeding or thromboembolic/ischemic events during 1 year of follow-up, while there was no statistical difference. In conclusion, vascular senescence leads to unstable INR values and increases higher bleeding risk during warfarin therapy, highlighting the importance of considering vascular senescence in future precision warfarin therapies. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Many factors influence warfarin efficacy; however, the effect of vascular senescence remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effects of vascular senescence on the efficacy and safety of warfarin. Through both rat models and clinical cohort studies, our findings indicated that vascular senescence may compromise the stability of warfarin, presenting challenges in maintaining its efficacy and safety., (Copyright © 2024 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.)

Background/aims: Early studies on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) reported a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) compared with warfarin; however, recent studies have reported a reduced risk. Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the risk of GIB in users of DOAC and warfarin., Methods: Using a common data model, we investigated the comparative risk of GIB in subjects from eight hospitals who were newly prescribed DOACs or warfarin. We excluded subjects who had a prior history of GIB or had been prescribed both medications. After propensity score matching, we analyzed 3,347 matched pairs of new DOAC and new warfarin users., Results: The risk of GIB in new DOAC users was comparable to that in new warfarin users (hazard ratio [HR], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65 to 1.40; p=0.808). New DOAC users had a similar risk of GIB to new warfarin users among older patients >65 years (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.52; p=0.997) and in older patients >75 years (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.68 to 2.10; p=0.509). In addition, the risk of GIB was not significantly different between two groups according to sex. We also found that the risk of GIB in DOAC users was 26% lower in edoxaban or apixaban subgroups compared to rivaroxaban or dabigatran subgroups (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.00; p=0.049)., Conclusions: In real-world practice, the risk of GIB in new DOAC users is comparable to that in new warfarin users. In DOAC users, the risk of GIB was lower in edoxaban or apixaban subgroups than rivaroxaban or dabigatran subgroups.

Introduction: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) carries a high risk of recurrence, and this risk is strongly related to the nature of the index event. Thus, extended anticoagulation treatment is recommended for patients with a high recurrence risk and should be considered for patients with an intermediate risk. This study aimed to provide insight into the clinical practice of extended anticoagulation for VTE patients METHODS. This was a retrospective study of VTE patients covering the period from January 2020 through June 2021. We categorised patients by their estimated risk of recurrence as low (less-than 3% per year), intermediate (3-8% per year) or high (> 8% per year). The decision to stop or extend anticoagulation was made in a multidisciplinary VTE clinic., Results: A total of 343 patients were included; 315 patients were eligible for analysis. The majority of patients (58.7%) had an intermediate recurrence risk. In total 80.3% received extended treatment. The use was highest (97.9%) among patients with a high recurrence risk, whereas 82.7% with an intermediate risk and 15.2% with a low risk received extended therapy. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants were preferred for extended therapy (82.2%), whereas 5.1% received warfarin and 12.6% low molecular weight heparin., Conclusions: In this real-world clinic, the majority of VTE patients switched to extended treatment after initial standard anticoagulation. The role of patient and physician preference as determinants driving this decision should be investigated further., Funding: This study received an unrestricted grant from Bayer, which had no involvement in the study design, data collection, analysis, or manuscript preparation., Trial Registration: Not relevant., (Published under Open Access CC-BY-NC-BD 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.)

Background and Objective: Prospective sequential analyses after a new drug approval allow proactive surveillance of new drugs. In the current study, we demonstrate feasibility of frailty-specific sequential analyses for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban versus warfarin., Methods: We partitioned Medicare data from 2011 to 2020 into datasets based on calendar year following the date of drug approval. Each calendar year of data was added sequentially for analysis. We used a new-user, active comparative design by comparing the initiators of dabigatran versus warfarin, rivaroxaban versus warfarin, and apixaban versus warfarin. Patients aged ≥ 65 years with atrial fibrillation without contraindication to the anticoagulants were included. Claims-based frailty index ≥ 0.25 was used to define frailty. The initiators of each direct oral anticoagulant were propensity-score matched to the initiators of warfarin within each frailty status. The effectiveness outcome was ischemic stroke or systemic thromboembolism, and the safety outcome was major bleeding. For each calendar year, we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from Cox proportional hazards models using all data available up to that year., Results: As an example of the results, in the 2020 dataset, compared with warfarin, apixaban was associated with a reduced risk of ischemic stroke or systemic thromboembolism (frail: HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.63-0.85; non-frail: HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.59-0.72) and major bleeding (frail: HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.57-0.69; non-frail: HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.56-0.63) in both frail and non-frail patients. We found evidence for apixaban's effectiveness and safety within 1-2 years after the drug approval in frail older patients., Conclusion: Our frailty-specific sequential analyses can be applied to future near-real-time monitoring of newly approved drugs., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the application value and safety of Warfarin, Rivaroxaban, and Dabigatran in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation., Methods: A total of 180 elderly patients with atrial fibrillation admitted to our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. According to their anticoagulant treatment regimen, patients were divided into three groups: Warfarin (57 cases), Rivaroxaban (61 cases), and Dabigatran (62 cases). General demographic information was collected, and coagulation function indicators-including fibrinogen (FIB), thrombin time (PT), activated partial thrombin time (APTT), and D-dimer (D-D)-as well as liver function indexes-including total bilirubin (TbiL), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alanine transferase (ALT)-were compared before and after 4 weeks of treatment., Results: There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics such as gender, age, body mass index, or disease course among the three groups. The total effective rate in the Warfarin group (84.21%) was significantly lower than in the Rivaroxaban (98.36%) and Dabigatran (96.77%) groups (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the total effective rate between the Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran groups (p > 0.05). Additionally, no significant differences were found in the effects of the three drugs on coagulation function, liver function, or the incidence of bleeding (p = 0.052)., Conclusion: Warfarin, Rivaroxaban, and Dabigatran can effectively prevent thrombosis in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation, with Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran showing superior effectiveness. All three drugs demonstrated similar low rates of bleeding events and had no significant impact on coagulation and liver function., (© 2024 The Author(s). Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC.)

Background: The objective of this study is to compare and assess the efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparin calcium (LMWH-Ca), followed by either warfarin or rivaroxaban, as treatment options for portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with cirrhosis., Methods: In this pilot study, cirrhotic (with liver function score of Child-Pugh A) patients diagnosed with PVT who were not on anticoagulant therapy received 2 weeks of subcutaneous injections of LMWH-Ca. They were then randomized to either warfarin (a full course of oral warfarin for 6 months) or rivaroxaban (a full course of oral rivaroxaban for 2 months), with 30 cases in each group. After a treatment period of up to 6 months, a comparative analysis was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of both groups. Volumetric changes in PVT were monitored dynamically using enhanced computed tomography scans before treatment at week 2 and month 6., Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the clinical characteristics of the patients between the two groups. Rivaroxaban treatment reduced PVT median volume from 1.83 cm3 at week 2 to 0.0 cm3 at month 6 and prevented the worsening of PVT after 6 months of treatment with LMWH-Ca (P < 0.001). On the other hand, warfarin treatment increased PVT median volume from 1.95 cm3 at week 2 to 3.78 cm3 at month 6 (P = 0.002). None of the 30 patients in the rivaroxaban group had clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding, while 2 of the 30 patients (7%) in the warfarin group had gastrointestinal bleeding (P = 0.317)., Conclusion: Rivaroxaban followed by LMWH-Ca is an effective anticoagulant treatment strategy for PVT in cirrhosis., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing elective procedures are at risk for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) and symptomatic bleeding. We aimed to identify risk factors to guide perioperative risk stratification., Methods: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the "Bridging Anticoagulation in Patients who Require Temporary Interruption of Warfarin Therapy for an Elective Invasive Procedure or Surgery" randomized trial. The primary outcomes were MACE and symptomatic bleeding. Our statistical approach encompassed standard univariate analysis, logistic stepwise regression, and Cox regression models. Additional interaction analyses evaluated the interplay between low-molecular-weight heparin bridge therapy and other identified risk factors., Results: Among a total of 1,813 participants (mean age 71.6 ± 8.8, 73.3 % male), MACE occurred in 25 (1.4 %) individuals, with pre-procedure clopidogrel use (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 7.73, 95 % CI 2.63-22.72, p < 0.001) and CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score ≥ 5 (aHR 2.89, 95 % CI 1.26-6.63, p = 0.012) identified as risk factors. Symptomatic bleeding occurred in 57 (3.1 %) individuals, with bridge therapy (aHR 1.84, 95 % CI 1.07-3.19, p = 0.029), renal disease (aHR 2.50, 95 % CI 1.34-4.67, p = 0.004), post-procedure aspirin use (aHR 2.86, 95 % CI 1.66-4.91, p < 0.001), post-procedure nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use excluding aspirin (aHR 3.40, 95 % CI 1.22-9.43, p = 0.019), and major surgery (aHR 3.94, 95 % CI 2.26-6.85, p < 0.001) identified as risk factors. The interactions between risk factors and bridging therapy on MACE and symptomatic bleeding outcomes were not significant (p > 0.05)., Conclusion: We identified predictors for MACE and symptomatic bleeding in AF patients undergoing elective procedures. These insights may help guide perioperative decisions to reduce the risk of adverse outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors have completed and submitted the appropriate disclosure forms. Further details regarding potential conflicts of interest can be found in the submitted forms., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly prescribed for life-long anticoagulation in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) patients, despite not being recommended in the guidelines. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs in CTEPH patients., Methods: From May 2013 to December 2022, patients who were first diagnosed with CTEPH in Fuwai Hospital and started long-term anticoagulation treatment with warfarin or DOACs were retrospectively included and followed up until (1) death, (2) transition to other kinds of anticoagulants, or (3) discontinuation of anticoagulation. Propensity score matching was used to balance confounding bias of baseline characteristics. All-cause death, major bleeding, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding and venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence were obtained and analysed., Results: After propensity score matching, 115 patients taking warfarin and 206 patients taking DOACs were included in our study and followed up for 5.5 [3.4, 7.1] years. There was no significant difference of survival between the warfarin and the DOAC group (p = 0.77). The exposure adjusted event rate of major bleeding (0.3 %/person-year vs 0.4 %/person-year, p = 0.705) and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (3.1 %/person-year vs 3.2 %/person-year, p > 0.999) was similar between two groups. The exposure adjusted rate of VTE recurrence was significantly higher in the DOAC group (1.5 %/person-year vs 0.3 %/person-year, p = 0.030)., Conclusion: In anticoagulation of CTEPH patients, DOACs have similar survival rate, similar risk of bleeding but higher risk of VTE recurrence than warfarin., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (AATS/ISHLT) guidelines recommend warfarin in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) to reduce the risk of device thrombosis and systemic embolization. Left ventricular assist device patients often undergo elective and emergent procedures that require interrupted anticoagulation. Data and experience vary on the optimal strategy to rapidly reverse warfarin in LVAD patients when an emergent procedure is planned., Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe the use of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC4) for warfarin reversal in patients with LVADs undergoing elective and emergent procedures., Methods: This retrospective, single-center, cohort review describes the use of PCC4 in patients with LVADs who require warfarin reversal for elective or emergent procedures. The primary outcome was a composite incidence of pump thrombosis, venous thromboembolism, and ischemic stroke within 30 days of PCC4 administration., Results: In total, 14 patients received 17 administrations of PCC4. One patient received 3 administrations, and 1 other patient received 2 administrations during separate encounters. The median dose was 500 units or 6.6 units/kg (range = 4.2-14.1 units/kg). Of the PCC4 administrations, 82% (14/17) were for low bleed risk procedures and 76% (13/17) were for elective procedures. There were no cases of pump thrombosis, venous thromboembolism, or stroke within 30 days of the procedure., Conclusions and Relevance: Low-dose PCC4 appears to be a safe and effective temporary reversal strategy for patients with LVADs undergoing low-bleed risk elective procedures., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Introduction: Mechanical heart valve (MHV) replacement requires long-life anticoagulation due to the risk of Prosthetic Valve Dysfunction (PVD) and cardioembolism., Methods: We report data from a prospective observational study conducted on MHV patients in the Khartoum Salam Centre for Cardiac Surgery built by 'Emergency,' an Italian Non-Governmental Organization, to evaluate the occurrence of PVD and associated risk factors., Results: We prospectively followed 3647 patients, and 38 patients (rate 1.04 × 100 pt-years) had PVD during follow-up. The time in therapeutic range (TTR) among patients without PVD was 53 % (IQR 37-67), and it was 43 % (IQR 19-58) among patients with PVD (p = 0.04). Twenty-three over 38 patients (60.5 %) were symptomatic, 18 (47.4 %) had obstructive valvular stenosis, 24 patients (63.2 %) had INR <2.0 at diagnosis, and 21 patients (55.3 %) had been off warfarin for a long time: 3 patients for 1 week, 1 patient for 2 weeks, and 17 patients for >4 weeks (6 patients were off warfarin from 3 to 12 months). Ten were uncompliant to treatment, and 8 were pregnant women. Ten patients (26.3 %) with PVD had had a previous episode of PVD, and 14 patients (36.8 %) had 2 or more associated risk factors. Only in 6 cases were no associate risk factors found., Conclusions: Among MHV patients on warfarin treatment with a sub-optimal quality of anticoagulation, the rate of PVD is 1.04 % pt-years, and the most frequent associated risk factor for PVD occurrence is warfarin withdrawal lasting more than one week., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Objectives: Over the last decade, direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have become preferred over warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). The objectives of this study were to quantify the shift over time from warfarin to DOACs and parallel changes in ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke rates in AF., Materials and Methods: This community-based retrospective study was undertaken within a single integrated health care network from 2011 to 2021. Changes over time in warfarin and DOAC use were quantified by year, both overall and stratified by CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score. Ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke rate changes over time were evaluated by Poisson regression. Stroke rates were evaluated in different time eras: 2011-2015 and 2016-2021., Results: Among 31,978 AF patients followed an average of 5.5 years, any OAC use increased from 50.2 % (2011) to 59.4 % (2020) (p < 0.001). Warfarin use decreased from 49.3 % to 30.8 %, while DOAC use increased from 2.0 % to 30.8 % (both p < 0.001). In 2020, patients with CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc 0-1 and 2-5 were more likely to use DOACs than warfarin (18.6 % vs. 6.7 %; 33.0 % vs. 28.2 %), whereas in CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc 6-9 DOACs were used less frequently (30.0 % vs. 40.8 %). Ischemic stroke rates significantly increased by 19 % (95 % CI: 7 %, 32 %) from 2011 to 2015, but significantly decreased by 18 % (10 %, 26 %) from 2016 to 2021. Hemorrhagic stroke rates stabilized in 2016-2021 (+3 %; -18 %, 30 %) after increasing in 2011-2015 (+36 %; 4 %, 78 %)., Conclusion: Improvements in ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke rates coincided temporally with increased uptake of OACs and a shift toward increased uptake of DOACs relative to warfarin., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Little is known how individual time-in-therapeutic-range (TTR) impacts the effectiveness and safety of warfarin therapy compared to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF)., Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of standard dose DOACs to warfarin in patients with AF, while categorizing warfarin treated patients into quartiles based on their individual TTR., Materials and Methods: We conducted a nationwide study including all patients with new-onset AF between 2011 and 2018 in Finland. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using Cox regression analysis with the inverse probability of treatment weighted method to assess the risks of ischaemic stroke (IS), intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) and mortality for users of apixaban ( n  = 12,426), dabigatran ( n  = 4545), rivaroxaban ( n  = 12,950) and warfarin ( n  = 43,548)., Results: The median TTR for warfarin users was 72%. Compared to the second best TTR quartile (reference), the risk of IS was higher in the two poorest TTR quartiles, and lower in the best TTR quartile and on rivaroxaban [2.35 (95% confidence interval, 1.85-2.85), 1.44 (1.18-1.75), 0.60 (0.47-0.77) and 0.72 (0.56-0.92)]. These differences were non-significant for apixaban and dabigatran. HR of ICH was 6.38 (4.88-8.35) and 1.87 (1.41-2.49) in the two poorest TTR groups, 1.44 (1.02-1.93) on rivaroxaban, and 0.58 (0.40-0.85) in the best TTR group compared to the reference group. Mortality was higher in the two poorest TTR groups and lowest in the best TTR group., Conclusions: The outcome was unsatisfactory in the two lowest TTR quartiles - in half of the patients treated with warfarin. The differences between the high TTR groups and standard dose DOACs were absent or modest.

Background : Several studies have examined INR fluctuations using pharmacokinetic (PK) models or post-hoc INR values after completing nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, but further study of the effects of the drug interaction with warfarin during treatment is necessary. Case Summary : Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is largely utilized in the outpatient setting so data regarding INR trends in hospitalized patients on warfarin is limited. However, many who receive nirmatrelvir/ritonavir outpatient experience difficulty with presenting to clinic for INR checks due to feeling acutely ill along with isolation precautions. We present the case of a patient receiving warfarin and utilizing home INR testing for monitoring. After diagnosis of coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19), she was started on nirmatrelvir/ritonavir on day five after testing positive. Most recent INR prior to the start of therapy was 2.7 and had been stable on the same dose for months prior to infection. On day two of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, her INR rose to 4.0 on home point of care INR testing. Despite reducing her dose of warfarin by 15%, her INR remained supratherapeutic the day after completing nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (4.0) and for several checks after. One month after completion of therapy, her INR returned to therapeutic levels. Practice Implications : While PK models and case series have hypothesized both potential increases or decreases in INR with the nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and warfarin interaction, COVID-19 infection itself can cause several pharmacodynamic changes which can increase INR, including decreased appetite and, in severe cases, organ dysfunction. This case provides real-world insight into the drug interaction between nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and the drug-disease state interaction between warfarin and COVID-19., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Stroke prevention guidance for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) uses evidence generated from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). However, applicability to patient groups excluded from trials remains unknown. Real-world patient data provide an opportunity to evaluate outcomes in a trial analogous population of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) users and in patients otherwise excluded from RCTs; however, there remains uncertainty on the validity of methods and suitability of the data. Successful reference trial emulation can support the generation of evidence around treatment effects in groups excluded or underrepresented in trials. We used linked United Kingdom primary care data to investigate whether we could emulate the pivotal ARISTOTLE trial (apixaban versus warfarin) and extend the analysis to investigate the impact of warfarin time in therapeutic range (TTR) on results., Methods and Findings: Patients with AF in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD Aurum) prescribed apixaban or warfarin from 1 January 2013 to 31 July 2019 were selected. ARISTOTLE eligibility criteria were applied to this population and matched to the RCT apixaban arm on baseline characteristics creating a trial-analogous apixaban cohort; this was propensity-score matched to warfarin users in the CPRD Aurum. ARISTOTLE outcomes were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression stratified by prior warfarin exposure status during 2.5 years of patient follow-up and results benchmarked against the trial results before treatment effectiveness was further evaluated based on (warfarin) TTR. The dataset comprised 8,734 apixaban users and propensity-score matched 8,734 warfarin users. Results [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval)] confirmed apixaban noninferiority for stroke or systemic embolism (SE) [CPRD 0.98 (0.82,1.19) versus trial 0.79 (0.66,0.95)] and death from any cause [CPRD 1.03 (0.93,1.14) versus trial 0.89 (0.80,0.998)] but did not indicate apixaban superiority. Absolute event rates for stroke/SE were similar for apixaban in CPRD Aurum and ARISTOTLE (1.27%/year), whereas a lower event rate was observed for warfarin (CPRD Aurum 1.29%/year, ARISTOTLE 1.60%/year). Analysis by TTR suggested similar effectiveness of apixaban compared with poorly controlled warfarin (TTR < 0.75) for stroke/SE [0.91 (0.73, 1.14)], all-cause death [0.94 (0.84, 1.06)], and superiority for major bleeding [0.74 (0.63, 0.86)]. However, when compared with well-controlled warfarin (TTR ≥ 0.75), apixaban was associated with an increased hazard for all-cause death [1.20 (1.04, 1.37)], and there was no significant benefit for major bleeding [1.08 (0.90, 1.30)]. The main limitation of the study's methodology are the risk of residual confounding, channelling bias and attrition bias in the warfarin arm, and selection bias and misclassification in the analysis by TTR., Conclusions: Analysis of noninterventional data generated results demonstrating noninferiority of apixaban versus warfarin consistent with prespecified benchmarking criteria. Unlike in ARISTOTLE, superiority of apixaban versus warfarin was not seen, possible due to the lower proportion of Asian patients and higher proportion of patients with well-controlled warfarin compared to ARISTOTLE. This methodological template can be used to investigate treatment effects of oral anticoagulants in patient groups excluded from or underrepresented in trials and provides a framework that can be adapted to investigate treatment effects for other conditions., Competing Interests: EMP was funded by a Medical Research Council studentship for this work, and is an employee of and holds stock in Compass Pathways outside the submitted work. UG is an employee of and holds stock in GSK. JT reports no conflict of interest and is supported by an unrestricted grant from GSK. LS reports grants from Wellcome, MRC, NIHR, BHF, Diabetes UK, ESRC, EU and GSK, personal fees from GSK and AstraZeneca, and is a trustee of the British Heart Foundation, outside the submitted work. PJB is supported by Barts Charity (MGU0504) and was supported by a GSK studentship at the time of writing. TBH reports no conflict of interest. AW reports no conflict of interest and is supported by a fellowship from British Heart Foundation (FS/19/19/34175). IJD reports grants, and holds stocks in GSK, outside the submitted work. KW has nothing to disclose., (Copyright: © 2024 Powell et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Purpose: This study aimed to examine the quality of life of patients receiving warfarin therapy at Dr. Hasan Sadikin Central General Hospital, and its relationship with demographic factors., Patients and Methods: The procedures started with the submission of a study permit, followed by validation of the Duke Anticoagulation Satisfaction Scale (DASS) questionnaire. In addition, the validated questionnaire was completed by the participants, and significant variables were analyzed using the chi-square method for multivariate analysis., Results: The results showed that the questionnaire was valid and could be used for further analyses. Among the 88 selected participants, 52 and 36 had scoring categories <56.266 and 56.266 ≤ x ≤ 143.734, respectively, with no patients having a scoring category > 143.734. In addition, participants with low education and aged ≥ 52 years were 4.916 and 3.161 times more at risk of having quality of life score of 56.266 ≤ x ≤ 143.734, respectively. Based on the results, the average quality of life score of patients was 59.66. Participants with low educational levels and those aged ≥ 52 years were at a higher risk of having quality of life score of 56.266 ≤ x ≤ 143.734., Conclusion: In summary, a lower quality of life score was linked to increased comfort and satisfaction among patients receiving warfarin treatment. Additionally, these patients experienced fewer feelings of limitations and inconveniences related to their treatment plans., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2024 Putriana et al.)

Background: Patients with atrial fibrillation and severe chronic kidney disease have higher risks of bleeding, thromboembolism, and mortality. However, optimal anticoagulant choice in these high-risk patients remains unclear., Methods and Results: Using deidentified electronic health records from the Optum Labs Data Warehouse, adults with atrial fibrillation and severe chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 ) initiating warfarin, apixaban, or rivaroxaban between 2011 and 2021 were included. Using inverse probability of treatment weighting, adjusted risks of major bleeding, stroke/systemic embolism, and death were compared among agents. A total of 6794 patients were included (mean age, 78.5 years; mean estimated glomerular filtration rate, 24.7 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 ; 51% women). Apixaban versus warfarin was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding (incidence rate, 1.5 versus 2.9 per 100 person-years; subdistribution hazard ratio [sub-HR], 0.53 [95% CI, 0.39-0.70]), and similar risks for stroke/systemic embolism (incidence rate, 1.9 versus 2.4 per 100 person-years; sub-HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.59-1.09]) and death (incidence rate, 4.6 versus 4.5 per 100 person-years; HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.82-1.29]). Rivaroxaban versus warfarin was associated with a higher risk of major bleeding (incidence rate, 4.9 versus 2.9 per 100 person-years; sub-HR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.10-2.48]), with no difference in risks for stroke/systemic embolism and death. Apixaban versus rivaroxaban was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding (sub-HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.36-0.78])., Conclusions: These real-world findings are consistent with potential safety advantages of apixaban over warfarin and rivaroxaban for patients with atrial fibrillation and severe chronic kidney disease. Further randomized trials comparing individual oral anticoagulants are warranted.

Objective: Patients with thromboembolic problems, prosthetic valves, or coagulation issues are commonly prescribed anticoagulants and antiplatelets. Anticoagulant and antiplatelet medication might constitute a challenge for dentists and dental hygienists since possible prolonged bleeding might interfere with dental procedures. The aim of the present study was to examine the bleeding durations associated with various anticoagulants and antiplatelets during professional dental hygiene sessions, utilizing a modified Ivy test adapted for the oral context., Materials and Methods: Ninety-three consecutive patients undergoing professional oral hygiene were recruited. Debridement during oral hygiene was performed using ultrasonic mechanical instrumentation, and bleeding sites were assessed and treated with gentle pressure using sterile gauzes. The time for bleeding cessation was recorded. Patients were categorized into six groups based on their drug intake, Control: no anticoagulants or antiplatelets DTI: direct thrombin inhibitors (dabigatran) AntiXa: directa factor Xa inhibitors (endoxaban, apixaban, rivaroxaban) VKA: vitamin K antagonists (warfarin, acenocoumarol) SAPT: single anti-platelet therapy (acetylsalicylic acid or clopidogrel) DAPT: dual anti-platelet therapy (acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel). Bleeding time was measured in seconds and mean values were assessed among the different groups. Differences between groups were investigated with Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's post-hoc correction for multiple comparisons or two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett post-hoc; RESULTS: Control patients presented the lowest bleeding time 50 s, followed by AntiXa (98), SAPT (105), DTI (120), DAPT (190) and VKA (203). A statistically significant difference was present among control and DTI (p = 0.004), VKA (p < 0.001), DAPT (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Based on the present outcomes, an increased risk of prolonged bleeding emerged in patients taking VKA and DAPT., Clinical Significance: bleeding did not interfere with the oral hygiene session The optimal period for dental treatment of these patients should be 2-3 h before the next dose, without the need to temporarily suspend the medication., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been the drug of choice for preventing ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation since 2014. In previous studies, the stroke risk while taking warfarin was 2 per 100 patient-years and 1.5% per year while taking DOACs. We hypothesized that even if ischemic stroke occurred during anticoagulation therapy with DOACs, the prognosis was likely to be better than that with warfarin., Methods and Results: Data from 2002 to 2019, sourced from a nationwide claims database, were used to identify atrial fibrillation patients using International Classification of Diseases codes. Patients who experienced an ischemic stroke during anticoagulation were categorized by the drugs used (warfarin, dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban). The primary outcome was mortality within 3 months and 1 year after the ischemic stroke. Among the 9578 patients with ischemic stroke during anticoagulation, 3343 received warfarin, and 6235 received DOACs (965 dabigatran, 2320 apixaban, 1702 rivaroxaban, 1248 edoxaban). The DOACs group demonstrated lower risks of 3-month (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.550, [95% CI, 0.473-0.639]; P <0.0001) and 1-year mortality (adjusted HR, 0.596 [95% CI, 0.536-0.663]; P <0.0001) than the warfarin group. Apixaban and edoxaban within the DOAC group exhibited particularly reduced 1-year mortality risk compared with other DOACs ( P <0.0001)., Conclusions: Our study confirmed that DOACs have a better prognosis than warfarin after ischemic stroke. The apixaban and edoxaban groups had a lower risk of death after ischemic stroke than the other DOAC groups.

Background: There have been limited data on the changes in clinical outcomes after the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in real clinical practice. We evaluated the changes in management strategies and long-term outcomes from the warfarin era to the DOAC era., Methods and Results: We compared the 2 series of multicenter COMMAND VTE (Contemporary Management and Outcomes in Patients With Venous Thromboembolism) registries in Japan enrolling consecutive patients with acute symptomatic VTE: Registry 1: 3027 patients in the warfarin era (2010-2014) and Registry 2: 5197 patients in the DOAC era (2015-2020). The prevalence of DOAC use increased more in Registry 2 than in the Registry 1 (Registry 1: 2.6% versus Registry 2: 79%, P <0.001). The cumulative 5-year incidence of recurrent VTE was significantly lower in Registry 2 than in Registry 1 (10.5% versus 9.5%, P =0.02), and the risk reduction of recurrent VTE in Registry 2 remained significant even after adjusting the confounders (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78 [95% CI, 0.65-0.93]; P =0.005). The cumulative 5-year incidence of major bleeding was not significantly different between the 2 registries (12.1% versus 13.7%, P =0.26), and the risk of major bleeding between the 2 registries was not significantly different even after adjusting the confounders (HR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.89-1.21]; P =0.63)., Conclusions: Along with the shift from warfarin to DOACs, there was a lower risk of recurrent VTE in the DOAC era than in the warfarin era, whereas there was no apparent change in the risk of major bleeding, which might still be an unmet need even in the DOAC era.

Background: New-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common complication after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery, increasing the risk of embolism and stroke. There is a lack of information on the use of anticoagulants in this context. The choice between Warfarin and Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) also is not well-established. This randomized study aimed to compare the feasibility and safety of Warfarin and Rivaroxaban in preventing thrombotic events in POAF patients after isolated CABG., Methods: A total of 66 patients were randomized parallelly with 1:1 allocation to receive either Rivaroxaban (n = 34) or Warfarin (n = 32). Major bleeding events within 30 days after discharge were the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included minor bleeding events and thrombotic episodes. Clinical characteristics, medication regimens, and left atrial diameter were assessed. Statistical analyses were performed using appropriate tests., Results: No thrombotic episodes were observed in either treatment arm. No major bleeding events occurred in either group. Four minor bleeding events were reported, with no significant difference between the treatment groups (P = 0.6). Patients with atrial fibrillation had significantly larger left atrial diameters compared to those with normal sinus rhythm (40.5 vs. 37.8 mm, P = 0.01)., Conclusions: This pilot study suggests that Warfarin and Rivaroxaban are both safe and effective for preventing thrombotic episodes in POAF patients after isolated CABG. No significant differences in major bleeding events were observed between the two anticoagulants. These findings may support the preference for DOACs like Rivaroxaban due to their convenience and easier maintenance., Trial Registration: Number IRCT20200304046696N1, Date 18/03/2020 https//irct.behdasht.gov.ir/ ., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

There are limited data on the optimal choice of anticoagulation in multiple myeloma (MM) patients receiving immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs). We conducted a propensity score-matched cohort study using the TriNetX database to compare the efficacy and safety of factor Xa inhibitors and warfarin in this patient population. Compared to warfarin, factor Xa inhibitors had a similar risk of deep vein thrombosis (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.11 [95% CI: 0.50-2.46]) or pulmonary embolism (HR: 1.08 [95% CI: 0.59-2.00]). There were no differences in the risk of gastrointestinal or intracranial bleeding. Factor Xa inhibitor-treated patients had lower all-cause mortality (HR: 0.56 [95% CI: 0.36-0.86]) compared with warfarin. These data suggest that factor Xa inhibitors had similar safety and efficacy compared with warfarin for MM patients on IMiDs., (© 2024 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: The standardization of warfarin anticoagulant therapy is the key to lifelong treatment for patients after heart valve replacement. The present study explored the possible risk factors for anxiety and depression during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and analyzed the influence of psychological state on medication safety., Methods: Eligible patients received a web-based questionnaire survey via the Wenjuanxing platform during outpatient visits. Depression was evaluated by the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS). Anxiety was evaluated by the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS). Medication adherence was evaluated by the Morisky scale., Results: A total of 309 patients (aged 52.2±11.4 years) were included in the present study. The SDS score of all included patients was 36.9±9.4 points, of which 11 (3.6%) patients were diagnosed as having depression. The SAS score of all included patients was 43.1±9.3 points, of which 71 (23%) patients were diagnosed as having anxiety. Seven patients (2.3%) had both anxiety and depression. Logistic regression analysis revealed that only monthly income was an independent influencing factor for depression. Regarding anxiety, patients who underwent repeated operations had a 2.264-fold greater risk, and patients who received combination medication had a 2.140-fold greater risk. More bleeding events and coagulation disorders could be observed in patients with anxiety, depression or both. When anxiety occurred, patients showed worse medication adherence. However, depression had no significant effect on medication adherence., Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the detection rate of mental illnesses such as anxiety and depression was high, which seriously affected the medication safety of warfarin. Analysis of its influencing factors will provide a reference for further standardized regulation of warfarin anticoagulant therapy after valve replacement., (© 2024. Huazhong University of Science and Technology.)

Introduction: People with atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently have competing mechanisms for ischaemic stroke, including extracranial carotid atherosclerosis. The objective of this study was to determine associations between use of oral anticoagulants (OACs) plus antiplatelet agents (APA) after ischaemic stroke and outcomes for patients with AF and carotid artery disease., Patients and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Participants receiving OACs with or without APA were propensity score-matched for age, sex, ethnicity, co-morbidities and presence of cardiac and vascular implants and grafts. Outcomes were 1-year mortality, recurrent stroke and major bleeding., Results: Of 5708 patients, 24.1% (n=1628) received non-vitamin K antagonist OACs (NOACs) with no APA, 26.0% (n=1401) received NOACs plus APA, 20.7% (n=1243) received warfarin without APA and 29.2% (n=1436) received warfarin plus APA. There was no significant difference in risk of recurrent stroke between the groups. Compared to receiving NOACs without APA, receiving warfarin plus APA was associated with a higher risk of mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 1.51 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20, 1.89)) and major bleeding (HR 1.66 (95% CI 1.40, 1.96)). Receiving NOACs plus APA was also associated with a higher risk of major bleeding compared to NOACs without APA (HR 1.27 (95% CI 1.07, 1.51), respectively)., Conclusions: The results suggest for patients with AF and carotid artery disease after ischaemic stroke, receiving NOACs without APA is associated with a lower risk of major bleeding with no negative impact on recurrent stroke or mortality. Evidence from randomised trials is needed to confirm this finding., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Introduction: This study aimed to assess perioperative bleeding complications and in-hospital mortality in patients requiring emergency general surgery presenting with a history of antiplatelet (AP) versus direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) versus warfarin use., Methods: A prospective observational study across 21 centers between 2019 and 2022 was conducted. Inclusion criteria were age 18 years or older, and DOAC, warfarin, or AP use within 24 hours of an emergency general surgery procedure. Outcomes included perioperative bleeding and in-hospital mortality. The study was conducted using analysis of variance, χ 2 , and multivariable regression models., Results: Of the 413 patients, 221 (53.5%) reported AP use, 152 (36.8%) DOAC use, and 40 (9.7%) warfarin use. The most common indications for surgery were obstruction (23% [AP], 45% [DOAC], and 28% [warfarin]), intestinal ischemia (13%, 17%, and 23%), and diverticulitis/peptic ulcers (7%, 7%, and 15%). Compared with DOAC use, warfarin use was associated with significantly higher perioperative bleeding complication (odds ratio [OR], 4.4 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.0-9.9]). There was no significant difference in perioperative bleeding complication between DOAC and AP use (OR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.4-1.1]). Compared with DOAC use, there was no significant difference in mortality between warfarin use (OR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.2-2.5]) or AP use (OR, 0.5 [95% CI, 0.2-1.2]). After adjusting for confounders, warfarin use (OR, 6.3 [95% CI, 2.8-13.9]), medical history, and operative indication were associated with an increase in perioperative bleeding complications. However, warfarin was not independently associated with risk of mortality (OR, 1.3 [95% CI, 0.39-4.7]), whereas intraoperative vasopressor use (OR, 4.7 [95% CI, 1.7-12.8]), medical history, and postoperative bleeding (OR, 5.5 [95% CI, 2.4-12.8]) were., Conclusion: Despite ongoing concerns about the increase in DOAC use and lack of readily available reversal agents, this study suggests that warfarin, rather than DOACs, is associated with higher perioperative bleeding complications. However, that risk does not result in an increase in mortality, suggesting that perioperative decisions should be dictated by patient disease and comorbidities rather than type of AP or anticoagulant use., Level of Evidence: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among multiple myeloma patients. Chang and colleagues' findings indicate that factor Xa inhibitors are as effective as warfarin in preventing VTE without raising the risk of gastrointestinal or intracranial bleeding complications. Commentary on: Chang et al. The comparative efficacy and safety of factor Xa inhibitors and warfarin for primary thromboprophylaxis in multiple myeloma patients undergoing immunomodulatory therapy. Br J Haematol 2024;205:473-477., (© 2024 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: Despite increased use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), limited evidence guides their use in the early postoperative period after bioprosthetic valve implantation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Our objective was to describe the efficacy and safety of DOACs and warfarin in the first 3 months after surgical bioprosthetic valve replacement or repair in patients with atrial fibrillation., Methods: This was a retrospective, registry-informed cohort study of surgical patients who underwent bioprosthetic valve replacement or repair, had concomitant atrial fibrillation and received oral anticoagulation at discharge. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of death, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, and systemic embolism; the primary safety outcome was a composite of major bleeding. Key secondary outcomes were comparative analyses of primary outcomes, temporal anticoagulation prescribing patterns, and 30-day readmission rates., Results: A total of 1743 patients were included. Of the 570 patients in the DOAC group, 17 (2%) met the composite efficacy outcome and 55 (10%) met the composite safety outcome. Of the 1173 patients receiving warfarin, 41 (3%) and 114 (10%) met the composite efficacy and safety outcomes, respectively. Comparative secondary analysis was not statistically significant for either the efficacy (adjusted odds ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-1.55, P = .59) or safety (adjusted odds ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-1.34, P = .76) outcomes. The 30-day readmission rates were similar between both groups., Conclusions: Our results suggest DOACs may be safe and effective alternatives to warfarin in the early postoperative period after valve repair or surgical bioprosthetic replacement. Confirmation awaits adequately powered prospective studies., (Copyright © 2023 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In the era of direct oral anticoagulants, vitamin K antagonists retain a clinically relevant role in thrombotic disorders. In Italy, approximately 20% of the patients on anticoagulant therapies receives a VKA, in most cases warfarin. The optimal management of this drug is challenging and cannot disregard its intricate and unpredictable pharmacokinetic properties and patient's thrombotic and bleeding risk. Several clinical issues encountered during warfarin treatment are still unanswered and are tentatively addressed by physicians. In this regard, the Italian Federation of Centers for the diagnosis of thrombotic disorders and the Surveillance of the Antithrombotic therapies (FCSA) provides some experience-based good clinical practice's suggestions on the following topics: (1) how to start the anticoagulant treatment with warfarin and warfarin induction regimen; (2) how to manage a subtherapeutic INR value; (3) how to manage a supratherapeutic INR value in asymptomatic patients; and (4) how to manage the association of warfarin with interfering drugs., Competing Interests: S.G. received honoraria for speaking at symposia from Pfizer and Daiichi-Sankyo and supports for attending meetings from Bayer, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Pfizer. P. B. received honoraria for lectures and/or participation on advisory board from Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Astra-Zeneca, Exeltis. D.B. received honoraria for lectures from Aspen and Werfen. C.A. received honoraria for lectures from Bayer. E.G. received honoraria for lectures from Sanofi and Italfarmaco, and for participation on advisory board from Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Novo Nordisk. G.M. received honoraria for lectures and for participation on advisory board: Bayer, Roche, Exeltis. G.R. declares no conflict of interest; A.S. received honoraria for lectures, manuscript writing, and/or participation on advisory board from Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi, Werfen, Viatris, Alexion, and Roche. V.T. declared no conflict of interest. S.T. received honoraria for lectures and for participation on advisory board from Werfen, Stago, Italfarmaco, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Sanofi. D.P. received honoraria for educational events from Pfizer, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Boehringer., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

Background: Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become the preferred drugs for managing venous thromboembolism (VTE). Despite their advantages over vitamin K antagonists such as warfarin, their use in obese patients remains controversial with many providers reluctant to switch patients managed on warfarin. Outcome research that opts to increase provider confidence when prescribing DOACs for patients with obesity will be invaluable., Objective: This investigation evaluated whether patients with a body mass index (BMI) 35 kg/m 2 or greater who were prescribed a DOAC had a higher risk for a recurrent VTE or bleed event relative to warfarin., Methods: The study was conducted in West Virginia which has the highest rate of obesity in the United States., Results: Of the total study population (1633), 2.3% (37) had a recurrent thrombotic event, 5.5% (89) had a major bleed event, and 10.7% (174) had some type of bleeding event. No individual patient characteristic was associated with recurrent thrombosis-including BMI. Older age, antiplatelet use, and taking a medication with a theoretical risk of increasing the effect of DOACs were associated with any and major bleeding events. The use of warfarin was associated with major bleeding events more frequently versus a DOAC. Body mass index was not a predictor for recurrent VTE or any bleed or major bleed events., Conclusions: These findings support the conclusion that DOACs are an appropriate and effective drug class for the management of VTE in patients with obesity., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin have shown benefit for preventing major ischemic events, albeit with increased bleeding risk, among patients in the general population with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data are scarce in patients with cirrhosis and AF., Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of apixaban versus rivaroxaban and versus warfarin in patients with cirrhosis and AF., Design: Population-based cohort study., Setting: Two U.S. claims data sets (Medicare and Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database [2013 to 2022])., Participants: 1:1 propensity score (PS)-matched patients with cirrhosis and nonvalvular AF initiating use of apixaban, rivaroxaban, or warfarin., Measurements: Primary outcomes included ischemic stroke or systemic embolism and major hemorrhage (intracranial hemorrhage or major gastrointestinal bleeding). Database-specific and pooled PS-matched rate differences (RDs) per 1000 person-years (PY) and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were estimated, controlling for 104 preexposure covariates., Results: Rivaroxaban initiators had significantly higher rates of major hemorrhagic events than apixaban initiators (RD, 33.1 per 1000 PY [95% CI, 12.9 to 53.2 per 1000 PY]; HR, 1.47 [CI, 1.11 to 1.94]) but no significant differences in rates of ischemic events or death. Consistently higher rates of major hemorrhage were found with rivaroxaban across subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Warfarin initiators also had significantly higher rates of major hemorrhage than apixaban initiators (RD, 26.1 per 1000 PY [CI, 6.8 to 45.3 per 1000 PY]; HR, 1.38 [CI, 1.03 to 1.84]), particularly hemorrhagic stroke (RD, 9.7 per 1000 PY [CI, 2.2 to 17.2 per 1000 PY]; HR, 2.85 [CI, 1.24 to 6.59])., Limitation: Nonrandomized treatment selection., Conclusion: Among patients with cirrhosis and nonvalvular AF, initiators of rivaroxaban versus apixaban had significantly higher rates of major hemorrhage and similar rates of ischemic events and death. Initiation of warfarin versus apixaban also contributed to significantly higher rates of major hemorrhagic events, including hemorrhagic stroke., Primary Funding Source: National Institutes of Health., Competing Interests: Disclosures: Disclosures can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M23-3067.

Introduction: There is a paucity of real-world studies examining the risks of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding (MB) among non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients switching from warfarin to a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). This retrospective study was conducted to compare the stroke/SE and MB risks between patients switched from warfarin to apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban in real-world clinical practice., Materials and Methods: This study used data from four United States commercial claims databases from January 1, 2012 to June 30, 2019. The study population included NVAF patients initially treated with warfarin and switched to apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban within 90 days of their warfarin prescription ending. Patients were matched 1:1 between the DOACs in each database using propensity scores and then pooled for the final analysis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate the risk of stroke/SE and MB., Results and Conclusions: The final population consisted of 2,611 apixaban-dabigatran, 12,165 apixaban-rivaroxaban, and 2,672 dabigatran-rivaroxaban pairs. Apixaban vs. dabigatran was associated with a lower risk of stroke/SE (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39-0.96) and MB (HR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.50-0.91). Apixaban vs. rivaroxaban was associated with a similar risk of stroke/SE (HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.73-1.07) and a lower risk of MB (HR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.52-0.68). There was no significant difference in either risk between dabigatran and rivaroxaban. These results provide important insights into how the risks of stroke/SE and MB for NVAF patients vary when switching from warfarin to different DOACs., (© 2024. The Author(s).)