Search

Clinical trials are the backbone for advancing therapeutic options for patients diagnosed with cancer. Yet only 7.1% of patients with cancer participate in clinical trials in the United States. In this article, we review some of the reasons for poor accrual and discuss potential solutions. See related article by van Berge Henegouwen et al., p. 3937., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Introduction: Squamous cell cancer (SqCC) is a lung cancer subtype with few targeted therapy options. Molecular characterization, that is, by next-generation sequencing (NGS), is needed to identify potential targets. Lung Cancer Master Protocol Southwest Oncology Group S1400 enrolled patients with previously treated stage IV or recurrent SqCC to assess NGS biomarkers for therapeutic sub-studies., Methods: Tumors underwent NGS using Foundation Medicine's FoundationOne research platform, which sequenced the exons and/or introns of 313 cancer-related genes. Mutually exclusive gene set analysis and Selected Events Linked by Evolutionary Conditions across Human Tumors were performed to identify mutually exclusive and co-occurring gene alterations. Comparisons were performed with data on 495 lung SqCC downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess associations between genetic variants and survival., Results: NGS data are reported for 1672 patients enrolled on S1400 between 2014 and 2019. Mutually exclusive gene set analysis identified two non-overlapping sets of mutually exclusive alterations with a false discovery rate of less than 15%: NFE2L2, KEAP1, and PARP4; and CDKN2A and RB1. PARP4, a relatively uncharacterized gene, showed three frequent mutations suggesting functional significance: 3116T>C (I1039T), 3176A>G (Q1059R), and 3509C>T (T1170I). When taken together, NFE2L2 and KEAP1 alterations were associated with poorer survival., Conclusions: As the largest dataset to date of lung SqCC profiled on a clinical trial, the S1400 NGS dataset establishes a rich resource for biomarker discovery. Mutual exclusivity of PARP4 and NFE2L2 or KEAP1 alterations suggests that PARP4 may have an uncharacterized role in a key pathway known to impact oxidative stress response and treatment resistance., Competing Interests: Disclosure Dr. Kozono discloses consulting for Vertex and Roche/Genentech and honoraria from RefleXion outside the submitted work. Dr. Tolba discloses employment at Foundation Medicine. Dr. Waqar discloses holding positions on scientific advisory boards for AstraZeneca and Gilead Sciences. Dr. Dragnev discloses receiving institutional research funding from Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, G1 Therapeutics, Merck, Molecular Templates, Novartis, Roche/Genentech. Dr. Cheng discloses receiving honoraria from AstraZeneca, Janssen, G1 Therapeutics, and research grants from AstraZeneca, and Genentech. Dr. Hirsch discloses holding positions on scientific advisory boards for BMS, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, Novartis, AbbVie, Novocure, NextCure, Merus, G1 Therapeutics, Regeneron, none related to this work, and holding patent for EGFR protein and gene copy number as predictive biomarkers for EGFR-directed therapies (through University of Colorado), no royalties. Dr. Mack discloses being a consultant for Amgen, Guardant Health, and Vivance Therapeutics, and receiving honoraria from AbbVie (educational lecture). Dr. Gray discloses being a consultant for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicines, Daiichi Sankyo, EMD Serono – Merck, Gilead Sciences, IDEOlogy Health, Janssen Scientific Affairs, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Loxo Oncology, Merck and Company, Novartis, OncoCyte Biotechnology, Spectrum ODAC, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Triptych Health Partners; research support from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech, G1 Therapeutics, Ludwig Institute of Cancer Research, Merck and Company, Novartis, Pfizer. Dr. Borghaei discloses receiving research support for clinical trials from BMS, Lilly, Amgen and holding positions on advisory board/consultant for BMS, Lilly, Genentech, Pfizer, Merck, EMD-Serono, Boehringer Ingelheim, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, Genmab, Regeneron, BioNTech, Amgen, Axiom, PharmaMar, Takeda, Mirati, Daiichi Sankyo, Guardant, Natera, Oncocyte, Beigene, iTEO, Jazz, Janssen, Puma, BerGenBio, Bayer, Iobiotech, Grid Therapeutics, holding position on data and safety monitoring board for University of Pennsylvania: CAR T Program, Takeda, Incyte, Novartis, Springworks, holding position on the scientific advisory board for Sonnetbio (stock options), Inspirna (formerly Rgenix, stock options), Nucleai (stock options), and receiving honoraria from Amgen, Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Regeneron, travel support from Amgen, BMS, Merck, Lilly, EMD-Serono, Genentech, Regeneron, Mirati. Dr. Herbst discloses holding positions on the board of directors for Immunocore, Junshi Pharmaceuticals, being consultant for AbbVie Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Bolt Biotherapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Candel Therapeutics, Checkpoint Therapeutics, Cybrexa Therapeutics, DynamiCure Biotechnology, eFFECTOR Therapeutics, Eli Lilly and Company, EMD Serono, Genentech, Gilead, HiberCell, I-Mab Biopharma, Immune-Onc Therapeutics, Immunocore, Janssen, Johnson and Johnson, Loxo Oncology, Merck and Company, Mirati Therapeutics, NextCure, Normunity, Novartis, Ocean Biomedical, Oncocyte Corp, Oncternal Therapeutics, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Revelar Biotherapeutics, Ribbon Therapeutics, Roche, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Xencor, receiving research support from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Company, Genentech/Roche, Merck and Company, and holding leadership roles in American Association for Cancer Research, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer, Southwest Oncology Group. Dr. Gandara discloses being a consultant for Adagene (institutional), AstraZeneca (institutional), Guardant Health (institutional), IO Biotech (institutional), Oncocyte (institutional), Oncohost (institutional), Merck (consultant), Roche-Genentech (institutional) and receiving institutional research grants from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Merck. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Nintedanib is a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR). The purpose of the study was to evaluate the response rate for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with mutations in TP53 , VEGFR1-3 , PDGFR-A , PDGFR-B , and FGFR1-3 treated with nintedanib as part of an open-label, single-arm pilot study., Methods: Patients with advanced NSCLC previously treated with platinum-doublet chemotherapy with the above mutations were enrolled. Exclusion criteria included necrotic tumors with invasion of blood vessels, history of recent thromboembolic events, increased risk of bleeding or thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and weight loss >10% within past 6 months. Nintedanib was administered at a dose of 200 mg orally twice daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and correlating outcomes with specific mutations. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02299141., Results: Between 2015 and 2019, 20 patients were enrolled with a median age was 66 years, 15 (75%) were females, 15 (75%) had adenocarcinoma, and 17 patients had a TP53 mutation (85%). Seventeen (85%) had received prior immunotherapy and 11 (55%) had received at least three prior lines of systemic therapy. The ORR was 15% with three partial responses (PR), while 12 patients had stable disease (SD), with disease control rate (DCR) consisting of a PR and SD greater than or equal to 16 weeks of 65% (n=13). Median PFS was 4.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.8-7.9] and median overall survival (OS) was 11.3 months (95% CI: 3.5-44.2). Three patients experienced prolonged clinical benefit from nintedanib, remaining on treatment for over 1 year and all three had a TP53 mutation and received prior immunotherapy. The most common adverse events of any grade included nausea (80%), fatigue (70%), diarrhea (60%), and anorexia (60%)., Conclusions: In this pilot study in heavily pretreated and molecularly selected patients with metastatic NSCLC, nintedanib showed modest activity., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-23-1717/coif). D.M. serves as an unpaid editorial board member of Journal of Thoracic Disease from October 2022 to September 2024. All authors report that the study was funded by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Oncology Research program as an independent, investigator-initiated study supported through a grant from Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (BIPI) with funding supplied to the institution. S.D. reports an advisory role for AstraZeneca, Genentech, Merus and Jazz pharmaceuticals and royalties from Springer publications. D.M. reports research funding from Heat Biologics, Merck, Celgene, AstraZeneca, Baxter, Incyte, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, EpicentRx, Pfizer, Roche, Lilly, Altum Pharmaceuticals, Array BioPharma, Surface Oncology, Arcus Biosciences, Boehringer Ingelheim, Y-mAbs Therapeutics and serves in an advisory role for AbbVie, G1 Therapeutics, Lilly Medical, Miratic Therapeutics, Arcus Biosciences. S.N.W. reports research funding from SWOG-Clinical Trials Partnership, American Society of Hematology, AbbVie, Gilead, Immunomedics Inc., Daiichi Sankyo, Cullinan Pearl, Verastem Inc, Janssen Research and Development LLC, Elevation Oncology, Genentech, Verastem, Advenchen, Ribon, Loxo Oncology, Takeda, Hoffman-LaRoche, honoraria from ASCO, MJH Life Sciences, travel support from Gilead, and advisory roles for Janssen, Gilead, AstraZeneca, and Hoosier Cancer Research Network. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare., (2024 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.)

Background: Large, node-negative but locally invasive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with increased perioperative risk but improved survival if a complete resection is obtained. Factors associated with positive margins in this population are not well-studied., Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using National Cancer Database (NCDB) for adult patients with >5 cm, clinically node-negative NSCLC with evidence of invasion of nearby structures [2006-2015]. Patients were classified as having major structure involvement (azygous vein, pulmonary artery/vein, vena cava, carina/trachea, esophagus, recurrent laryngeal/vagus nerve, heart, aorta, vertebrae) or chest wall invasion (rib pleura, chest wall, diaphragm). Our primary outcome was to evaluate factors associated with incomplete resection (microscopic: R1, macroscopic: R2). Kaplan-Meier analysis and cox multivariable regression models were used to evaluate overall survival (OS), 90-day mortality, and factors associated with positive margins., Results: Among 2,368 patients identified, the median follow-up was 33.8 months [interquartile range (IQR), 12.6-66.5 months]. Most patients were white (86.9%) with squamous cell histology (47.3%). Major structures were involved in 26.4% of patients and chest wall invasion was seen in 73.6%. Four hundred and seventy-eight patients (20.2%) had an incomplete resection. Multivariable analysis revealed that black race [hazard ratio (HR) 1.568, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.109-2.218] and major structure involvement (HR 1.412, 95% CI: 1.091-1.827) was associated with increased risk of incomplete resection and surgery at an academic hospitals (HR 0.773, 95% CI: 0.607-0.984), adenocarcinoma histology (HR 0.672, 95% CI: 0.514-0.878), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.431, 95% CI: 0.316-0.587) were associated with decreased risk of incomplete resection. The 5-year OS was 43.7% in the entire cohort and 28.8% in patients with positive margins and 47.5% in patients with an R0 resection. Positive margin was also associated with a significantly higher 90-day mortality rate (9.9% versus 6.7%)., Conclusions: For patients with large, node-negative NSCLC invading nearby structures, R0 resection portends better survival. Treatment at academic centers, adenocarcinoma histology, and receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy are associated with R0 resection in this high-risk cohort., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-23-989/coif). D.M. serves as an unpaid editorial board member of Journal of Thoracic Disease from October 2022 to September 2024. D.M. reports research support from Heat Biologics (Inst), Merck (Inst), Celgene (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Baxter (Inst), Incyte (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), EpicentRx (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Roche (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Altum Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Array BioPharma (Inst), Surface Oncology (Inst), Arcus Biosciences (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Y-mAbs Therapeutics (Inst) and participation on a data safety monitoring board for AbbVie, G1 Therapeutics, Lilly Medical, Mirati Therapeutics, Arcus Biosciences. S.N.W. mentioned support from AbbVie Inc., Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Genentech, Immunomedics, Inc., Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc., Roche, Astellas Pharma Inc., Daiichi Sankyo, Cullinan Pearl, Verastem Inc., GlaxoSmithKline/GSK, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Elevation Oncology, Genentech, Loxo Oncology, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Ribon Therapeutics, Inc., AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Advenchen Laboratories, Gilead Sciences for the institution for clinical trials, SWOG-Clinical Trials Partnership, and receives payment for lectures or honoraria for ASCO SEP Editorial board, and she participates on the advisory board for AstraZeneca, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, and Hoosier Cancer Research Network. P.P.S. has speaking honoraria for Varian Medical Systems. B.T.H. is a former consultant at Oncocyte Corporation and a former MBA intern at Eli Lilly and Company. V.P. reports receiving NIH funding (R01CA258681). The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2024 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.)

Problem: Several barriers to physicians becoming clinical investigators exist, including inexperience, lack of available mentors, and inconsistent instructive approaches with varying degrees of participation during training. These barriers cause fewer hematology-oncology fellows to pursue academic careers. A consensus is needed on structuring education in clinical investigation paired with active participation in development of a clinical trial guided by a mentor with the goal of increasing fellow interest in clinical research and pursuit of careers in academic medicine., Approach: The clinical trial development (CTD) program was initiated at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis in 2002 as a hands-on learning experience for hematology and oncology fellows in the design, implementation, and publication of clinical trials. Each fellow was required to identify a mentor and propose at least 1 prospective investigator-initiated clinical trial., Outcomes: At the time of data abstraction in July 2023, 118 fellows had participated in the CTD program and initiated protocols in a variety of areas according to their interests. Fellows were included in data abstraction if their fellowship began in 2002 through 2021; the program is ongoing, and the most recent class will graduate in 2024. Disease types were evenly distributed between solid tumor oncology (60 [51%]) or classic and malignant hematology (58 [49%]). Ninety-three fellows (79%) obtained institutional review board approval, and 60 (65%) published their results. Among graduating fellows, 67 (66%) secured an academic faculty appointment. Fellows with institutional review board-approved projects had significantly higher odds of obtaining an academic faculty appointment (odds ratio, 4.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.54, 15.98; P = .007).Next StepsNext steps will be to further evaluate the effect of the mentorship network on early career productivity of trainees that graduate and the feasibility of extending the program to another institution., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Association of American Medical Colleges.)

The optimal treatment paradigm for patients with oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. Some patients with oligometastatic disease experience prolonged remission after locally consolidative radiation therapy (RT), while others harbor micrometastatic disease (below limits of detection by imaging) and benefit from systemic therapy. To risk-stratify and identify the patients most likely to benefit from locally consolidative RT, we performed a multi-institutional cohort study of 1487 patients with oligometastatic NSCLC undergoing liquid biopsy analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). In total, 1880 liquid biopsies were performed and approximately 20% of patients (n = 309) had ctDNA measured prior to RT and after their diagnosis of oligometastatic disease. Patients with undetectable ctDNA (pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in plasma using the Tempus xF assay) before RT had significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.004) and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.030). ctDNA maximum variant allele frequency (VAF) pre-RT and ctDNA mutational burden pre-RT were both significantly inversely correlated with PFS (maximum VAF P = 0.008, mutational burden P = 0.003) and OS (maximum VAF P = 0.007, mutational burden P = 0.045). These findings were corroborated by multivariate Cox proportional hazards models that included eight additional clinical and genomic parameters. Overall, these data suggest that in patients with oligometastatic NSCLC, pre-RT ctDNA can potentially identify the patients most likely to benefit from locally consolidative RT and experience prolonged PFS and OS. Similarly, ctDNA may be useful to identify undiagnosed micrometastatic disease where it may be appropriate to prioritize systemic therapies., (© 2023. Nature Publishing Group UK.)

Purpose: Lung Cancer Master Protocol (Lung-MAP), a public-private partnership, established infrastructure for conducting a biomarker-driven master protocol in molecularly targeted therapies. We compared characteristics of patients enrolled in Lung-MAP with those of patients in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) trials to examine if master protocols improve trial access., Methods: We examined patients enrolled in Lung-MAP (2014-2020) according to sociodemographic characteristics. Proportions for characteristics were compared with those for a set of advanced NSCLC trials (2001-2020) and the US advanced NSCLC population using SEER registry data (2014-2018). Characteristics of patients enrolled in Lung-MAP treatment substudies were examined in subgroup analysis. Two-sided tests of proportions at an alpha of .01 were used for all comparisons., Results: A total of 3,556 patients enrolled in Lung-MAP were compared with 2,215 patients enrolled in other NSCLC studies. Patients enrolled in Lung-MAP were more likely to be 65 years and older (57.2% v 46.3%; P < .0001), from rural areas (17.3% v 14.4%; P = .004), and from socioeconomically deprived neighborhoods (42.2% v 36.7%, P < .0001), but less likely to be female (38.6% v 47.2%; P < .0001), Asian (2.8% v 5.1%; P < .0001), or Hispanic (2.4% v 3.8%; P = .003). Among patients younger than 65 years, Lung-MAP enrolled more patients using Medicaid/no insurance (27.6% v 17.8%; P < .0001). Compared with the US advanced NSCLC population, Lung-MAP under represented patients 65 years and older (57.2% v 69.8%; P < .0001), females (38.6% v 46.0%; P < .0001), and racial or ethnic minorities (14.8% v 21.5%; P < .0001)., Conclusion: Master protocols may improve access to trials using novel therapeutics for older patients and socioeconomically vulnerable patients compared with conventional trials, but specific patient exclusion criteria influenced demographic composition. Further research examining participation barriers for under represented racial or ethnic minorities in precision medicine clinical trials is warranted.

Purpose: To determine how participation in daily life is impacted during the first six months following a new cancer diagnosis and to identify risk factors for participation restrictions. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were used to suggest referrals to rehabilitation services., Methods: Participants (n = 123) were adults (> 18 years) with the newly diagnosed primary brain, breast, colorectal, or lung cancer. PROs were collected at baseline (within 30 days of diagnosis/treatment initiation), two and five months post baseline. Daily life participation was assessed through the community participation indicators (CPI) (score range: 0-1) and patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) ability to participate, (score range: 20-80; mean: 50, SD: 10). PROMIS-43 profile was also completed. Linear mixed-effect models with random intercept evaluated change in participation over time., Results: The baseline total sample mean CPI score was 0.56; patients reported mildly impaired participation based on PROMIS scores (baseline: 46.19, 2-month follow-up: 44.81, 5 months: 44.84). However, no statistically significant changes in participation were observed over the study period. Risk factors for lower participation included receiving chemotherapy, lower physical function, higher anxiety and fatigue, and reduction in employment, p < 0.05. PROs indicated that roughly half of the participants may benefit from physical or occupational therapy or mental health support, but only 20-36% were referred by their medical team., Conclusion: People newly diagnosed with cancer experience impaired participation, but they are infrequently referred to supportive services such as rehabilitation. The use of PROs to assess participation, physical function, and mental health can promote access to supportive care services by identifying patients who may benefit from rehabilitation beyond those identified through routine clinical care., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: The American Cancer Society has recently reported an increase in the percentage of patients with localized lung cancer from 2004 to 2018, coinciding with the initial lung cancer screening guidelines issued in 2013. We conducted a National Cancer Database (NCDB) study to further evaluate the trends in stage I according to patient and tumor characteristics., Methods: We selected patients with lung cancer from the NCDB Public Benchmark Report diagnosed between 2010 and 2017. Patients with stages I to IV according to the AJCC seventh edition were evaluated according to the year of diagnosis, histology, age, sex, race, and insurance., Results: Among the 1,447,470 patients identified in the database, 56,382 (3.9%) were excluded due to stage 0 or unknown, or incorrect histology, leaving 1,391,088 patients eligible. The percentage of patients with stage I increased from 23.5% in 2010 to 29.1% in 2017 for all lung cancers, from 25.9% to 31.8% in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and from 5.0% to 5.4% in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Patients younger than 70 years, males and blacks had lower percentages of stage I compared to older patients, females, and nonblacks respectively. Patients with no insurance had the lowest percentage of stage I., Conclusions: There has been a significant increase in the percentage of stage I lung cancer at diagnosis from 2010 to 2017, which occurred mostly in NSCLC. Although the staging shift was observed in all subsets of patients, there were noticeable imbalances according to demographic factors., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Multimodality treatment for resectable non-small cell lung cancer has long remained at a therapeutic plateau. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are highly effective in advanced non-small cell lung cancer and promising preoperatively in small clinical trials for resectable non-small cell lung cancer. This large multicenter trial tested the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant atezolizumab and surgery., Methods: Patients with stage IB to select IIIB resectable non-small cell lung cancer and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0/1 were eligible. Patients received atezolizumab 1200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for 2 cycles or less followed by resection. The primary end point was major pathological response in patients without EGFR/ALK+ alterations. Pre- and post-treatment computed tomography, positron emission tomography, pulmonary function tests, and biospecimens were obtained. Adverse events were recorded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.4.0., Results: From April 2017 to February 2020, 181 patients were entered in the study. Baseline characteristics were mean age, 65.1 years; female, 93 of 181 (51%); nonsquamous histology, 112 of 181 (62%); and clinical stages IIB to IIIB, 147 of 181 (81%). In patients without EGFR/ALK alterations who underwent surgery, the major pathological response rate was 20% (29/143; 95% confidence interval, 14-28) and the pathological complete response rate was 6% (8/143; 95% confidence interval, 2-11). There were no grade 4/5 treatment-related adverse events preoperatively. Of 159 patients (87.8%) undergoing surgery, 145 (91%) had pathologic complete resection. There were 5 (3%) intraoperative complications, no intraoperative deaths, and 2 postoperative deaths within 90 days, 1 treatment related. Median disease-free and overall survival have not been reached., Conclusions: Neoadjuvant atezolizumab in resectable stage IB to IIIB non-small cell lung cancer was well tolerated, yielded a 20% major pathological response rate, and allowed safe, complete surgical resection. These results strongly support the further development of immune checkpoint inhibitors as preoperative therapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Serclutamab talirine (Ser-T, formerly ABBV-321) is an antibody-drug conjugate consisting of an antibody (AM-1-ABT-806) directed against activated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and a pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer. We investigated Ser-T monotherapy in a phase I, first-in-human, dose-escalation, and dose-expansion study in patients with advanced solid tumors associated with EGFR overexpression., Methods: Eligible patients (≥18 years) had advanced, histologically confirmed solid tumors associated with EGFR overexpression (centralized testing). Patients received Ser-T intravenously once every 4 weeks (Q4W; 5-50 μg/kg) in the dose-escalation phase. Herein, preliminary antitumor activity at the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) is reported only for patients with glioblastoma ( n = 24); additional assessments included all treated patients., Results: Sixty-two patients (median age: 58 years) were enrolled within the dose-escalation ( n = 43) and dose-expansion ( n = 19) phases. One dose-limiting toxicity, grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase elevation, occurred at 20 μg/kg during dose escalation. The Ser-T RP2D regimen of 50 μg/kg × 1 (loading dose) followed by 25 μg/kg Q4W (maintenance dose) was administered during dose expansion. Fatigue (37%) was the only treatment-emergent adverse event (AE) occurring in >25% of patients. Two patients (3%) reported mild treatment-related ocular AEs (eye pruritus). Responses in patients with glioblastoma included 1 partial response (~33 months), 6 stable disease, and 14 progressive disease (not evaluable: n = 3)., Conclusions: Ser-T monotherapy at doses up to 50 μg/kg initial dose, followed by 25 μg/kg Q4W demonstrated a tolerable safety profile with minimal antitumor activity observed in patients with glioblastoma. The glioblastoma dose-expansion cohort was closed due to a lack of efficacy (NCT03234712)., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology.)

Objectives: The treatment options for patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who develop tumor progression after platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are limited. The combination of ICI with inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth receptor (VEGFR) signaling has shown promising results in previously untreated patients., Materials and Methods: In this single institution phase II study, patients with advanced stage NSCLC previously treated with at least one line including ICI received ramucirumab 10 mg/kg and atezolizumab 1,200 mg intravenously every 21 days until tumor progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by the RECIST 1.1 criteria according to the investigator assessment. Secondary endpoints included clinical benefit rate (CBR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and tolerability., Results: Twenty-one patients were enrolled between June 2019 and April 2021. The median age was 67 (range 42-82), 17 (81 %) were female, and 15 (71 %) had non-squamous histology. The median number of prior systemic treatment lines and prior ICI lines were 3 (range 2-8) and 1 (range 1-3), respectively. One patient achieved a complete response for an ORR of 4.8 % while 16 (76.2 %) had stable disease with a CBR of 80.9 %. The median PFS was 3.4 months, and the median OS was 16.5 months. The most common adverse events included hypertension (86 %), proteinuria (67 %), and nausea (52 %). Grade 3 or 4 events were seen in 9 (43 %) of patients, with hypertension being the most common (33 %) of the grade 3 or 4 events., Conclusions: Although the primary endpoint of ORR was not met, the combination of ramucirumab plus atezolizumab was associated with a high CBR and the OS was better than expected in heavily pretreated patients. Therefore, further investigation with ICI plus VEGF inhibition is warranted., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

In an ongoing, open-label, single-arm phase II study ( NCT02927301 ), 181 patients with untreated, resectable, stage IB-IIIB non-small cell lung cancer received two doses of neoadjuvant atezolizumab monotherapy. The primary end point was major pathological response (MPR; ≤10% viable malignant cells) in resected tumors without EGFR or ALK alterations. Of the 143 patients in the primary end point analysis, the MPR was 20% (95% confidence interval, 14-28%). With a minimum duration of follow-up of 3 years, the 3-year survival rate of 80% was encouraging. The most common adverse events during the neoadjuvant phase were fatigue (39%, 71 of 181) and procedural pain (29%, 53 of 181), along with expected immune-related toxicities; there were no unexpected safety signals. In exploratory analyses, MPR was predicted using the pre-treatment peripheral blood immunophenotype based on 14 immune cell subsets. Immune cell subsets predictive of MPR in the peripheral blood were also identified in the tumor microenvironment and were associated with MPR. This study of neoadjuvant atezolizumab in a large cohort of patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer was safe and met its primary end point of MPR ≥ 15%. Data from this single-arm, non-randomized trial suggest that profiles of innate immune cells in pre-treatment peripheral blood may predict pathological response after neoadjuvant atezolizumab, but additional studies are needed to determine whether these profiles can inform patient selection and new therapeutic approaches., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Resistance to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a major unmet need. Combining ICI with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/VEGF receptor inhibition has yielded promising results in multiple tumor types., Methods: In this randomized phase II Lung-MAP nonmatch substudy (S1800A), patients ineligible for a biomarker-matched substudy with NSCLC previously treated with ICI and platinum-based chemotherapy and progressive disease at least 84 days after initiation of ICI were randomly assigned to receive ramucirumab plus pembrolizumab (RP) or investigator's choice standard of care (SOC: docetaxel/ramucirumab, docetaxel, gemcitabine, and pemetrexed). With a goal of 130 eligible patients, the primary objective was to compare overall survival (OS) using a one-sided 10% level using the better of a standard log-rank (SLR) and weighted log-rank (WLR; G[rho = 0, gamma = 1]) test. Secondary end points included objective response, duration of response, investigator-assessed progression-free survival, and toxicity., Results: Of 166 patients enrolled, 136 were eligible (69 RP; 67 SOC). OS was significantly improved with RP (hazard ratio [80% CI]: 0.69 [0.51 to 0.92]; SLR one-sided P = .05; WLR one-sided P = .15). The median (80% CI) OS was 14.5 (13.9 to 16.1) months for RP and 11.6 (9.9 to 13.0) months for SOC. OS benefit for RP was seen in most subgroups. Investigator-assessed progression-free survival (hazard ratio [80% CI]: 0.86 [0.66 to 1.14]; one-sided SLR, P = .25 and .14 for WLR) and response rates (22% RP v 28% SOC, one-sided P = .19) were similar between arms. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 42% of patients in the RP group and 60% on SOC., Conclusion: This randomized phase II trial demonstrated significantly improved OS with RP compared with SOC in patients with advanced NSCLC previously treated with ICI and chemotherapy. The safety was consistent with known toxicities of both drugs. These data warrant further evaluation.

Background: Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase orchestrates DNA double strand break (DSB) repair; ATM inhibitors may therefore enhance the therapeutic effect of DSB-inducing treatments such as radiotherapy (RT). M3541 is an orally administered selective inhibitor of ATM., Methods: This phase I dose-escalation study evaluated the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase II dose(s) (RP2D), safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and antitumor activity of M3541 in combination with fractionated palliative RT in patients with solid tumors. Fifteen patients received palliative RT (30 Gy in 10 fractions) and escalating doses of M3541 (50-300 mg administered on RT fraction days) guided by a Bayesian 2-parameter logistic regression model with overdose control., Results: Doses of M3541 up to 300 mg/fraction day were well tolerated. One patient (200 mg group) experienced two dose-limiting toxicities (urinary tract infection, febrile neutropenia) that resolved with antibiotics. All patients reported ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) but none led to treatment discontinuation. No grade ≥ 4 TEAEs were reported and there was no indication of a dose effect for any TEAE. Three patients (20.0%; 95% confidence interval 4.3-48.1) had confirmed complete or partial response. M3541 total plasma levels did not increase with dose following single or repeated dosing. No relationship was observed between dose and changes in the ratio of phosphorylated to total ATM or in immune cell counts., Conclusions: The MTD and RP2D could not be established as the study closed early due to the absence of a dose-response relationship and non-optimal PK profile. No further clinical development of M3541 was pursued. (Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03225105. Registration date July 21, 2017)., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Vorolanib is a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor with anti-angiogenic properties. This study aimed to evaluate the tolerability, safety and efficacy of vorolanib when added to checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in patients with advanced solid tumors., Methods: We conducted a phase 1b study of vorolanib (300 or 400 mg orally once daily) plus pembrolizumab or nivolumab using a standard 3 + 3 design to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). The endpoints included safety, toxicity and objective response rate, according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)., Results: Sixteen patients (9 in pembrolizumab arm, 7 in nivolumab arm) with gastrointestinal or lung cancers were enrolled. All patients had at least 1 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE). The most common TRAEs across all cohorts were lymphopenia (n = 7), leukopenia (n = 5), fatigue (n = 5), and alanine aminotransferase elevation (n = 5); most toxicities were grade (G) 1-2. DLTs were reported in 3 patients at vorolanib 400 mg dose level, with G3 aspartate aminotransferase elevation, G3 rectal hemorrhage, and G3 rash. Of 13 total response-evaluable patients, 2 patients had confirmed partial responses (1 rectal squamous cell cancer and 1 small cell lung cancer). Two patients achieved prolonged stable disease. Vorolanib 300 mg daily was determined to be the RP2D for either pembrolizumab or nivolumab., Conclusion: Combination vorolanib 300 mg orally once daily plus CPI appears to be a feasible regimen with manageable toxicity and promising efficacy in select tumor types. NCT03511222. Date of Registration: April 18, 2018., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing may identify patients at high risk for recurrence following chemoradiation (CRT) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). We evaluated the feasibility of ctDNA testing on a readily available commercial fixed-gene panel to predict outcomes in patients with LA-NSCLC., Methods: Plasma of 43 patients was collected at CRT initiation (pre-CRT), completion (post-CRT1), quarterly follow up for 12 months (post-CRT2, 3, 4, 5 respectively) after CRT, and at disease progression. ctDNA analysis was performed using InVisionFirst ® -Lung to detect mutations in 36 cancer-related genes. ctDNA clearance was defined as absence of pre-CRT variants at post-CRT1. Patients without detectable pre-CRT variants or no post-CRT1 samples were excluded., Results: Twenty eight of 43 patients (65%) had detectable variants pre-CRT. Nineteen of 43 patients (44%) had detectable pre-CRT variants and post-CRT1 samples and were included in analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 65 years (43-82), and most patients had stage IIIB disease (10/19, 53%). Two patients died from non-cancer related causes before post-CRT2 and were excluded from further analysis. All three patients who did not clear ctDNA had tumor relapse with a median time to relapse of 74 days (30-238), while 50% (7/14) of those who cleared ctDNA have remained disease free. Progression free survival was longer in patients who cleared ctDNA compared to those who did not (median 567 vs 74 d, p = 0.01)., Conclusions: Although it is feasible to use ctDNA testing on a limited gene panel to identify patients with LA-NSCLC who are at high risk for disease recurrence following CRT, further studies will be necessary to optimize these assays before they can be used to inform clinical care in patients with lung cancer., Competing Interests: LM: Lectures and educational activities: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Tecnofarma, AstraZeneca, Roche, Takeda. Consulting/advisory role: Roche, Takeda. Research Grants: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim. Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche. Others: International Mentorship Program funded by AstraZeneca. SW: Research grant support from -2% effort on “Duke-UNC Wash U Partnership for Early Phase Clinical Trials in Cancer” 1UM1 CA186704-01 grant as mentored faculty, DSMB Chair for Hoosier Cancer Research Network study, and institutional PI for studies with support from Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Ariad, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Hengrui Therapeutics, Xcovery, EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc., Checkpoint Therapeutics, Inc., Genentech, Inc., Lilly, Stemcentrx, Inc., Ignyta, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical, Synermore Biologics Co., Ltd., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Merck & Company, Inc., NewLink Genetics Corporation, and Celgene. JW: Advisory board for Novocure, Consultant for Novoure, Employment for Millipore (Spouse), Travel/Expenses from Halozyme. KH: employee and stockholder for Inivata. CK: employee and stockholder for Inivata. CM: employee and stockholder for Inivata. RG: Advisory Board for Achilles, Consulting for GenePlus, Horizon Pharmaceuticals (Spouse). BB: Research support from 4D Pharma, Abbvie, Amgen, Aptitude Health, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Blueprint Medicines, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Cergentis, Cristal Therapeutics, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GSK, Inivata, Janssen, Onxeo, OSE immunotherapeutics, Pfizer, Roche-Genentech, Sanofi, Takeda, Tolero Pharmaceuticals. DM: Advisory board for Abbvie, Takeda, PharmaMar, Gilead, Boehringer Ingelheim; Consultant for Abbvie, Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, PharmaMar, Gilead. The study received funding from Inivata. The funder had the following involvement in the study: study design, analysis and data interpretation, the writing of this article, and the decision to submit it for publication., (Copyright © 2022 Knapp, Mezquita, Devarakonda, Aldea, Waqar, Pepin, Ward, Botticella, Howarth, Knape, Morris, Govindan, Besse and Morgensztern.)

Progress in the overall treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) has moved at a slower pace than non-small-cell lung cancer. In fact, the standard treatment regimen for limited stage SCLC has not appreciably shifted in more than 20 years, consisting of four to six cycles of cisplatin and etoposide chemotherapy concurrent with thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) for responsive disease. Nevertheless, long-term outcomes have improved with median survival approaching 25-30 months, and approximately one third of patients now survive 5 years. This is likely attributable in part to improvements in staging, including use of brain magnetic resonance imaging and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography imaging, advances in radiation treatment planning, and supportive care. The CONVERT and CALGB 30610 phase III trials failed to demonstrate a survival advantage for high-dose, once-daily TRT compared with standard 45 Gy twice-daily TRT, although high-dose, once-daily TRT remains common in practice. A phase III comparison of high-dose 60 Gy twice-daily TRT versus 45 Gy twice-daily TRT aims to confirm the provocative outcomes reported with 60 Gy twice daily in the phase II setting. Efforts over time have shifted from intensifying PCI, to attempting to reduce treatment-related neurotoxicity, to more recently questioning whether careful magnetic resonance imaging surveillance may obviate the routine need for PCI. The addition of immunotherapy has resulted in mixed success in extensive-stage SCLC with modest benefit observed with programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors, and several ongoing trials assess programmed death-ligand 1 inhibition concurrent or adjuvant to chemoradiotherapy in limited-stage SCLC. Major advances in future treatment will likely depend on a better understanding and exploiting of molecular characteristics of SCLC with increasing personalization of therapy., Competing Interests: Jeffrey A. BogartStock and Other Ownership Interests: Cardan Robotics, Verve Medical Saiama N. WaqarResearch Funding: Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Lilly, Pfizer, Genentech/Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, Newlink Genetics, EMD Serono, Puma Biotechnology, Novartis, Xcovery, Synermore biologics, Celgene, Vertex, Bristol Myers Squibb, Stem CentrRx, Hengrui Therapeutics, Checkpoint Therapeutics, Ignyta, AstraZeneca, ARIAD, Roche, MerckNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) provide recommended management for patients with SCLC, including diagnosis, primary treatment, surveillance for relapse, and subsequent treatment. This selection for the journal focuses on metastatic (known as extensive-stage) SCLC, which is more common than limited-stage SCLC. Systemic therapy alone can palliate symptoms and prolong survival in most patients with extensive-stage disease. Smoking cessation counseling and intervention should be strongly promoted in patients with SCLC and other high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas. The "Summary of the Guidelines Updates" section in the SCLC algorithm outlines the most recent revisions for the 2022 update, which are described in greater detail in this revised Discussion text.

Purpose: Approximately 10%-40% of patients with lung cancer report no history of tobacco smoking (never-smokers). We analyzed whole-exome and RNA-sequencing data of 160 tumor and normal lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) samples from never-smokers to identify clinically actionable alterations and gain insight into the environmental and hereditary risk factors for LUAD among never-smokers., Methods: We performed whole-exome and RNA-sequencing of 88 and 69 never-smoker LUADs. We analyzed these data in conjunction with data from 76 never-smoker and 299 smoker LUAD samples sequenced by The Cancer Genome Atlas and Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium., Results: We observed a high prevalence of clinically actionable driver alterations in never-smoker LUADs compared with smoker LUADs (78%-92% v 49.5%; P < .0001). Although a subset of never-smoker samples demonstrated germline alterations in DNA repair genes, the frequency of samples showing germline variants in cancer predisposing genes was comparable between smokers and never-smokers (6.4% v 6.9%; P = .82). A subset of never-smoker samples (5.9%) showed mutation signatures that were suggestive of passive exposure to cigarette smoke. Finally, analysis of RNA-sequencing data showed distinct immune transcriptional subtypes of never-smoker LUADs that varied in their expression of clinically relevant immune checkpoint molecules and immune cell composition., Conclusion: In this comprehensive genomic and transcriptome analysis of never-smoker LUADs, we observed a potential role for germline variants in DNA repair genes and passive exposure to cigarette smoke in the pathogenesis of a subset of never-smoker LUADs. Our findings also show that clinically actionable driver alterations are highly prevalent in never-smoker LUADs, highlighting the need for obtaining biopsies with adequate cellularity for clinical genomic testing in these patients., Competing Interests: Humam KadaraResearch Funding: Johnson and Johnson Irena LancEmployment: Gyroscope Therapeutics, Arch Oncology (I) Saiama N. WaqarResearch Funding: Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Lilly, Pfizer, Genentech/Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, Newlink Genetics, EMD Serono, Puma Biotechnology, Novartis, Xcovery, Synermore Biologics, Celgene, Vertex, Bristol Myers Squibb, Stem CentRx, Hengrui Therapeutics, Checkpoint Therapeutics, Ignyta, AstraZeneca, ARIAD, Roche, Merck Daniel MorgenszternConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, Takeda, PharmaMar, Gilead Sciences, G1 Therapeutics, Lilly MedicalResearch Funding: Heat Biologics, Merck, Celgene, AstraZeneca, Baxter, Incyte, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, EpicentRx, Pfizer, Roche, Lilly, Altum Pharmaceuticals, Array BioPharma, Surface Oncology Jeffrey WardEmployment: MilliporeConsulting or Advisory Role: Novocure, Guidepoint IncTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Halozyme Ashiq MasoodHonoraria: Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer IngelheimSpeakers' Bureau: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer IngelheimResearch Funding: Boston Biomedical, Ipsen, Seattle Genetics, Novocure, Macrogenics, Merck, Genentech/Roche, Exelixis, Astellas Pharma, Debiopharm Group, PRA Health, CytomX Therapeutics, Calithera Biosciences, Proteus Digital Health, Tempus Shankha SatpathyEmployment: FOGPharmaStock and Other Ownership Interests: FOGPharmaPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Proteogenomic Methods for Diagnosing Cancer Steven A. CarrStock and Other Ownership Interests: SEER, KymeraHonoraria: BiogenConsulting or Advisory Role: Kymera, SEER, PTM BiolabsPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: I have several patents related to use of HLA peptides as vaccine candidates Ignacio WistubaConsulting or Advisory Role: Genentech/Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, HTG Molecular Diagnostics, Asuragen, Pfizer, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, GlaxoSmithKline, Guardant Health, Merck, MSD Oncology, Bayer, OncoCyte, Flame BiosciencesSpeakers' Bureau: Pfizer, MSD Oncology, Roche, Merck, AstraZenecaResearch Funding: Genentech, Merck, HTG Molecular Diagnostics, Silicon Biosytems, Adaptimmune, EMD Serono. Pfizer, MedImmune, OncoPlex Diagnostics, Takeda, Karus Therapeutics, Amgen, 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Bayer, Novartis, Guardant Health, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Johnson & Johnson, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Akoya Biosciences Harvey PassHonoraria: Genentech/RocheConsulting or Advisory Role: Genentech/Roche, NovartisResearch Funding: Biodesix, Micronoma, NanoString Technologies, Celsius TherapeuticsPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Patent Pending, use of fibulin for the diagnosis of mesothelioma; Patent Pending, use of HMGB1 for the diagnosis of mesothelioma, with University of Hawaii; Patent Pending, use of osteopontin for the diagnosis of mesothelioma, with Wayne State UniversityTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Genentech/Roche Ramaswamy GovindanHonoraria: Genentech/AbbVie, AbbVie, GeneplusConsulting or Advisory Role: Genentech/Roche, AbbVie, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Nektar, Jounce Therapeutics, Roche, Janssen, Amgen, Achilles TherapeuticsNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Aim: Aurora kinase A (AURKA) is a pleiotropic serine/threonine kinase that orchestrates mitotic progression. Paclitaxel stabilises microtubules and disrupts mitotic spindle assembly. The combination of AURKA inhibitor (alisertib) plus paclitaxel may be synergistic in rapidly proliferative cancers. We evaluated the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of alisertib in combination with nab-paclitaxel and its preliminary efficacy in patients with refractory high-grade neuroendocrine tumours (NETs)., Method: This is a two-part, Phase 1 study. In Part A (dose escalation), a standard 3 + 3 design was used to determine MTD. In Part B (dose expansion), patients with predominantly refractory high-grade NETs were enrolled., Results: In total, 31 patients were enrolled and treated (16 in Part A and 15 in Part B). The MTD of alisertib was 40 mg BID on D1-3 per week and nab-paclitaxel 100mg/m 2 weekly: 3 weeks, 1 week off. Dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia, and other common side-effects included fatigue, mucositis, and diarrhoea. In Part A, a patient with small-cell lung cancer with partial response (PR) was treated for more than 2 years, whereas four other patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (one patient), small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (two patients), or high-grade NET (one patient) achieved stable disease (SD). In Part B, 13 of 15 enrolled patients had high-grade NETs. Of these, one had PR, and four had SD for more than 10 months., Conclusions: The combination of alisertib and nab-paclitaxel has manageable side-effect profile and showed promising preliminary efficacy in high-grade NETs, warranting further testing., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01677559., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Delta-like protein 3 (DLL3) is highly expressed in solid tumors, including neuroendocrine carcinomas/neuroendocrine tumors (NEC/NET). Rovalpituzumab tesirine (Rova-T) is a DLL3-targeting antibody-drug conjugate. Patients with NECs and other advanced DLL3-expressing tumors were enrolled in this phase I/II study (NCT02709889). The primary endpoint was safety. Two hundred patients were enrolled: 101 with NEC/NET (large-cell NEC, gastroenteropancreatic NEC, neuroendocrine prostate cancer, and other NEC/NET) and 99 with other solid tumors (melanoma, medullary thyroid cancer [MTC], glioblastoma, and other). The recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was 0.3 mg/kg every 6 weeks (q6w) for two cycles. At the RP2D, grade 3/4 adverse events included anemia (17%), thrombocytopenia (15%), and elevated aspartate aminotransferase (8%). Responses were confirmed in 15/145 patients (10%) treated at 0.3 mg/kg, including 9/69 patients (13%) with NEC/NET. Rova-T at 0.3 mg/kg q6w had manageable toxicity, with antitumor activity observed in patients with NEC/NET, melanoma, MTC, and glioblastoma., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Activation of the mTOR pathway has been implicated in the development of several malignancies and alterations in TSC1, TSC2, STK11 and NF1 , can lead to the dysregulation of this pathway. Furthermore, mutations in TSC1 and NF2 are known to confer sensitivity to everolimus-an mTOR inhibitor. Based on these data, a single-arm, open label, single-institution phase II basket study was designed to assess the activity of everolimus in patients with solid malignancies whose tumors harbored mutations in TSC1, TSC2, NF1, NF2 , or STK11 ., Methods: A total of 12 patients with histologically confirmed diagnosis of advanced solid tumors (metastatic, recurrent, or unresectable) with mutations in TSC1, TSC2, NF1, NF2 or STK11 genes, who had failed at least one line of standard of care systemic therapy, were enrolled to this open label, single-arm study. Presence of mutations in TSC1, TSC2, NF1, NF2 or STK11 genes was assessed using targeted-next generation sequencing (NGS). All eligible patients were treated with everolimus at an initial dose of 10 mg orally once daily in cycles of 28 days. The primary endpoint of this study was overall response rate (ORR)., Results: Of 12 patients enrolled, 8 were evaluable for response at the end of 2 cycles. One complete response (CR) was observed (12.5%) and one patient (12.5%) had stable disease (SD), while six (75%) patients showed disease progression. Everolimus was overall well tolerated with anemia, decreased neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, peripheral edema and hyperglycemia representing the most common adverse events. One patient discontinued treatment due to a treatment related grade 4 pericardial effusion. Both patients with CR or SD had a diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma with NF1 or STK11 mutations, respectively., Conclusions: Although this study failed to meet its prespecified ORR threshold for success of 30% or higher, exploratory analyses suggest potential activity for everolimus in a subset of patients with lung adenocarcinomas with STK11 or NF1 mutations. Further studies are necessary to systematically explore the clinical activity of everolimus, potentially as a combination therapy, in these patients., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-195). Dr. BP receives research support from Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr. BP has received speaker honoraria from BioAscend and OncLive, has serve as a consultant for AstraZeneca and Guidepoint, and has received assay supply by Roche.Roche for laboratory research outside the submitted work. Mr. LV reports an unpaid consulting agreement with Jounce Therapeutics, Inc. Dr. HP reports research funding to her institution from Ambrx, Amgen, Aprea Therapeutics AB, Array BioPharma, Bayer, BeiGene, BJ Bioscience, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Elicio Therapeutics, EMD Serono, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Gossamer Bio, Hoffman-LaRoche, Hutchison Medi-Pharma, ImmuneOncia Therapeutics, Incyte, Jounce Therapeutics, Macrogenics, MedImmune, Medivation, Merck, Millenium, Mirati Therapeutics, Novartis, Oncologie, Pfizer, PsiOxus Pharmaceuticals, Seattle Genetics, Synermore Biologics, Puma Biotechnology, Regeneron, Taiho, Vertex, Turning Point Therapeutics, Xencor, Inc, Genentech, BJ Bioscience, Vedanta Bioscences, TopAlliance Biosciences outside this submitted work. Dr. DM has served on Advisory Boards for Boehringer-Ingelheim, Abbvie, Celgene, Takeda and PharmaMar outside of this submitted work. Dr. DM serves as an unpaid editorial board member of Journal of Thoracic Disease from Sep 2020 to Aug 2022. Dr. RG has served on advisory boards for AbbVie, Inivata, Pfizer, Genentech, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Nektar, Merck, Celgene, Partner Therapeutics, GlaxoSmithKline, Jounce, and Achilles and has served as a consultant for AbbVie, Eli Lilly and Company, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Genentech, Millennium Pharm, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, NeoHealth, Janssen, Amgen, and GenePlus. Dr. PP reports personal fees from Bristol Myers, personal fees from Merck, personal fees from Eisai, outside the submitted work. Dr. MQB has served as site PI for studies funded by Medimmune, AstraZeneca, Millenium, CRAB, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, outside the submitted work. She also is on the Board of Directors for Lung Cancer Connection and serves on the American Society for Clinical Oncology e-Learning Editorial Board. Dr. SNW reports that the trial is supported by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. She reports funding from the SWOG-Clinical Trials Partnership, honoraria from the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and serves as Chair of Data Safety Monitoring Board for a study through the Hoosier Oncology Group outside this submitted work. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare., (2021 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The objective of the Lung-MAP sub-study S1400A was to evaluate the response rate to durvalumab, an anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody, in patients with squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (SqNSCLC)., Patients and Methods: Patients who progressed on at least 1 prior platinum-based chemotherapy were eligible. The study was designed as a phase II/III trial comparing durvalumab with docetaxel but was modified to a single-arm, phase II trial with the primary endpoint of objective response when immunotherapy became an approved treatment., Results: A total of 116 patients were registered to this sub-study; 78 to durvalumab and 38 to docetaxel. Of the 78 patients, 9 were ineligible, and 1 was not evaluable for endpoints. Responses were achieved in 11 patients among the 68 eligible and evaluable patients on durvalumab (overall response rate, 16%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7%-25%). The disease control rate was 54% (95% CI, 43%-66%), the median overall survival was 11.6 months (95% CI, 10.2-14.3 months), and the median progression-free survival was 2.9 months (95% CI, 2.0-4.0 months). PD-L1 data was available for 43 patients on durvalumab, with 14 (33%) patients who were PD-L1-positive (≥ 25%) and 2 responses (overall response rate, 14%; 95% CI, 0%-33%), the disease control rate was 57% (95% CI, 31%-83%), the median overall survival and progression-free survival were 10.7 months (95% CI, 9.2-14.3 months) and 2.3 months (95% CI, 1.4-4.2 months), respectively. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 22 (32%) patients on durvalumab, with 6 discontinuing owing to drug-related adverse events (9%; 95% CI, 2%-16%)., Conclusions: Durvalumab shows single-agent activity and toxicities in this sub-group of patients that is comparable with other anti-programmed cell death protein 1/PD-L1 antibodies., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Lung-MAP S1400K was designed to evaluate the response to telisotuzumab vedotin, an antibody-drug conjugate targeting c-MET, in patients with c-MET-positive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)., Patients and Methods: Patients with previously treated SCC with c-MET-positive tumors (H score ≥ 150, Ventana SP44 assay) were enrolled into 2 cohorts: Cohort 1 (immune checkpoint inhibitor-naive) and Cohort 2 (immune checkpoint inhibitor refractory). Telisotuzumab vedotin 2.7 mg/kg was administered intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Response assessments were performed every 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, response within cohort, duration of response, and toxicities. Interim analysis was planned after 20 evaluable patients, with ≥ 3 responses needed to continue enrollment., Results: Forty-nine patients (14% of screened patients) were assigned to S1400K, 28 patients enrolled (15 in Cohort 1 and 13 in Cohort 2), and 23 were eligible. S1400K closed on December 21, 2018 owing to lack of efficacy. Two responses (response rate of 9%; 95% confidence interval, 0%-20%) were reported in cohort 1 (1 complete and 1 unconfirmed partial response), whereas 10 patients had stable disease, with a disease control rate of 52%. The median overall and progression-free survival was 5.6 and 2.4 months, respectively. There were 3 grade 5 events (2 pneumonitis, in Cohort 2, and 1 bronchopulmonary hemorrhage, in Cohort 1)., Conclusion: Telisotuzumab vedotin failed to meet the pre-specified response needed to justify continuing enrollment to S1400K. Pneumonitis was an unanticipated toxicity observed in patients with SCC., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors combined with immunotherapy have shown antitumour activity in preclinical studies. We aimed to assess the safety and activity of olaparib in combination with the PD-L1-inhibitor, durvalumab, in patients with germline BRCA1-mutated or BRCA2-mutated metastatic breast cancer., Methods: The MEDIOLA trial is a multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2, basket trial of durvalumab and olaparib in solid tumours. Patients were enrolled into four initial cohorts: germline BRCA-mutated, metastatic breast cancer; germline BRCA-mutated, metastatic ovarian cancer; metastatic gastric cancer; and relapsed small-cell lung cancer. Here, we report on the cohort of patients with breast cancer. Patients who were aged 18 years or older (or aged 19 years or older in South Korea) with germline BRCA1-mutated or BRCA2-mutated or both and histologically confirmed, progressive, HER2-negative, metastatic breast cancer were enrolled from 14 health centres in the UK, the USA, Israel, France, Switzerland, and South Korea. Patients should not have received more than two previous lines of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Patients received 300 mg olaparib in tablet form orally twice daily for 4 weeks and thereafter a combination of olaparib 300 mg twice daily and durvalumab 1·5 g via intravenous infusion every 4 weeks until disease progression. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability, and 12-week disease control rate. Safety was analysed in patients who received at least one dose of study treatment, and activity analyses were done in the full-analysis set (patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and were not excluded from the study). Recruitment has completed and the study is ongoing. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02734004., Findings: Between June 14, 2016, and May 2, 2017, 34 patients were enrolled and received both study drugs and were included in the safety analysis. 11 (32%) patients experienced grade 3 or worse adverse events, of which the most common were anaemia (four [12%]), neutropenia (three [9%]), and pancreatitis (two [6%]). Three (9%) patients discontinued due to adverse events and four (12%) patients experienced a total of six serious adverse events. There were no treatment-related deaths. 24 (80%; 90% CI 64·3-90·9) of 30 patients eligible for activity analysis had disease control at 12 weeks., Interpretation: Combination of olaparib and durvalumab showed promising antitumour activity and safety similar to that previously observed in olaparib and durvalumab monotherapy studies. Further research in a randomised setting is needed to determine predictors of therapeutic benefit and whether addition of durvalumab improves long-term clinical outcomes compared with olaparib monotherapy., Funding: AstraZeneca., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of carfilzomib plus irinotecan (C/I) in patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC)., Patients and Methods: Patients with SCLC who progressed after 1 platinum-containing regimen for recurrent or metastatic disease were eligible. Patients were stratified as: sensitive (SS) (progressive disease > 90 days after chemotherapy) or refractory (RS) (progressive disease 30 to 90 days after chemotherapy) and received up to 6 cycles of C/I; imaging was performed every 2 cycles. The primary endpoint was 6-month overall survival (OS)., Results: All 62 patients enrolled were evaluable for efficacy and adverse events. 6-month OS was 59% in the platinum SS and 54% in the platinum RS. The overall response rate was 21.6% (2.7% complete response, 18.9% partial response) in SS (n = 37) and 12.5% (all partial response) in RS (n = 25). The disease control rate was 68% (SS) and 56% (RS). Progression-free survival and OS were 3.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6-4.6 months) and 6.9 months (95% CI, 4.3-12.3 months) in SS, and 3.3 months (95% CI, 1.8-3.9 months) and 6.8 months (95% CI, 4.1-11 months) in RS. Twenty-nine (47%) patients experienced ≥ grade 3 adverse events; 8 (12.9%) subjects had grade 4 toxicities. Three treatment-related deaths occurred: myocardial infarction (possible), lung infection (possible), and sepsis (probable)., Conclusion: In patients with relapsed SCLC, C/I was effective in the treatment of SS and RS. With 4.8% grade 5 toxicity, C/I is a viable option for relapsed patients with SCLC with performance status 0 to 1, particularly in platinum-resistant patients, or subjects who cannot receive immunotherapy., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Despite initial effectiveness of ALK receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with ALK+ NSCLC, therapeutic resistance will ultimately develop. Serial tracking of genetic alterations detected in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can be an informative strategy to identify response and resistance. This study evaluated the utility of analyzing ctDNA as a function of response to ensartinib, a potent second-generation ALK TKI., Methods: Pre-treatment plasma was collected from 76 patients with ALK+ NSCLC who were ALK TKI-naive or had received prior ALK TKI, and analyzed for specific genetic alterations. Longitudinal plasma samples were analyzed from a subset (n = 11) of patients. Analysis of pre-treatment tumor biopsy specimens from 22 patients was compared with plasma., Results: Disease-associated genetic alterations were detected in 74% (56 of 76) of patients, the most common being EML4-ALK. Concordance of ALK fusion between plasma and tissue was 91% (20 of 22 blood and tissue samples). Twenty-four ALK kinase domain mutations were detected in 15 patients, all had previously received an ALK TKI; G1269A was the most prevalent (4 of 24). Patients with a detectable EML4-ALK variant 1 (V1) fusion had improved response (9 of 17 patients; 53%) to ensartinib compared to patients with EML4-ALK V3 fusion (one of seven patients; 14%). Serial changes in ALK alterations were observed during therapy., Conclusions: Clinical utility of ctDNA was shown, both at pre-treatment by identifying a potential subgroup of ALK+ NSCLC patients who may derive more benefit from ensartinib and longitudinally by tracking resistance. Prospective application of this technology may translate to improved outcomes for NSCLC patients treated with ALK TKIs., (Copyright © 2019 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Patients with SCLC rarely undergo biopsies at relapse. When pursued, tissue obtained can be inadequate for molecular testing, posing a challenge in identifying potentially targetable alterations in a clinically meaningful time frame. We examined the feasibility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing in identifying potentially targetable alterations in SCLC., Experimental Design: ctDNA test results were prospectively collected from patients with SCLC between 2014 and 2017 and analyzed. ctDNA profiles of SCLC at diagnosis and relapse were also compared., Results: A total of 609 samples collected from 564 patients between 2014 and 2017 were analyzed. The median turnaround time for test results was 14 days. Among patients with data on treatment status, there were 61 samples from 59 patients and 219 samples from 206 patients collected at diagnosis and relapse, respectively. The number of mutations or amplifications detected per sample did not differ by treatment status. Potentially targetable alterations in DNA repair, MAPK and PI3K pathways, and genes such as MYC and ARID1A were identifiable through ctDNA testing. Furthermore, our results support that it may be possible to reconstruct the clonal relationship between detected variants through ctDNA testing., Conclusions: Patients with relapsed SCLC rarely undergo biopsies for molecular testing and often require prompt treatment initiation. ctDNA testing is less invasive and capable of identifying alterations in relapsed disease in a clinically meaningful timeframe. ctDNA testing on an expanded gene panel has the potential to advance our knowledge of the mechanisms underlying treatment resistance in SCLC and aid in the development of novel treatment strategies., (©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Objective: Lung-MAP (SWOG S1400) is a master platform trial assessing targeted therapies in squamous NSCLC. The objective of study C (S1400C) was to evaluate the response rate to palbociclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and cyclin-dependent kinase 6 inhibitor, in patients with cell cycle gene abnormalities., Methods: Patients with squamous NSCLC, a performance status of 0 to 2, and normal organ function who had progressed after at least one prior platinum-based chemotherapy with cyclin-dependent kinase 4 gene (CDK4) or cyclin D1 gene (CCND1), cyclin D2 gene (CCND2), or cyclin D3 gene (CCND3) amplifications on tumor specimens were eligible. The study was originally designed as a phase II/III trial comparing palbociclib with docetaxel, but it was modified to a single-arm phase II trial with the primary end point of response when immunotherapy was approved. If two or fewer responses were seen in the first 20 patients, then the study would cease enrollment., Results: A total of 88 patients (9% of patients screened) were assigned to S1400C, and 53 patients enrolled (including 17 to receive docetaxel). One patient who had been registered to receive docetaxel was re-registered to receive palbociclib after progression while taking docetaxel. The frequencies of cell cycle gene alterations in the eligible patients taking palbociclib (n = 32) were as follows: CCND1, 81% (n = 26); CCND2, 9% (n = 3); CCND3, 6% (n = 2); and CDK4, 3% (n = 1). In all, 32 eligible patients received palbociclib. There were two partial responses (response rate 6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0%-15%]), both with CCND1 amplification. Twelve patients had stable disease (38% [95% CI: 21%-54%]). The median progression-free survival was 1.7 months (95% CI: 1.6-2.9 months) and the median overall survival was 7.1 months (95% CI: 4.2-12.5)., Conclusion: Palbociclib as monotherapy failed to demonstrate the prespecified criteria for advancement to phase III testing., (Copyright © 2019 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: A partial response according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors includes a wide range of changes in tumor size. This study evaluated whether further specification of tumor reduction based on the depth of response (DpR) would provide a more precise association with outcomes for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy., Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for the randomized phase 3 CA031 trial in patients with NSCLC treated with carboplatin in combination with nab-paclitaxel or solvent-based paclitaxel. Quartiles according to the maximum tumor reduction from the baseline were defined (quartile 1 [Q1], >0% to 25%; quartile 2 [Q2], >25% to 50%; quartile 3 [Q3], >50% to 75%; and quartile 4 [Q4], >75%) and were compared with those patients with no tumor reduction (NTR). The primary objective was to evaluate the association between DpR and overall survival (OS)., Results: Of the 1052 patients enrolled in the CA031 trial, 959 (91%) were evaluable, and they included 365 (38.1%) who were classified as Q1, 327 (34.1%) who were classified as Q2, 131 (13.7%) who were classified as Q3, and 34 (3.5%) who were classified as Q4; 102 had NTR (10.6%). The median OS values for patients in the NTR, Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4 groups were 4.8, 10.4, 14.5, 19.3, and 23.5 months, respectively. The maximum DpR on treatment was an independent predictor of improved OS in comparison with patients with NTR; the hazard ratio decreased from 0.43 in Q1 to 0.16 in Q4., Conclusions: DpR was strongly associated with OS in patients with NSCLC receiving first-line platinum-based therapy. Additional studies may help to define the role of DpR in solid tumors., (© 2019 American Cancer Society.)

Background: This exploratory single-arm phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of RRx-001 followed by reintroduction of platinum plus etoposide in patients with previously treated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC)., Methods: Patients were treated with RRx-001 4 mg IV on day 1 of each week of a 21-day cycle followed at progression by re-challenge with etoposide 80-100 IV mg/m 2 on days 1, 2 and 3 and cisplatin 60-80 mg/m 2 IV on day 1 or carboplatin AUC 5-6 IV on day 1, every 21 days. The primary end points were overall survival (OS) and overall response rate to platinum regimen., Results: Twenty-six patients were enroled and received at least one dose of RRx-001. The median number of prior lines of therapy was 2 (range 1-9) and 19 (73.1%) patients had platinum-resistant disease. In the intention-to-treat population, one patient (3.8%) had complete response and six (23.1%) had partial response on platinum plus etoposide. The estimated median and 12-month OS from enrolment were 8.6 months and 44.1%, respectively. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event from RRx-001 was mild discomfort at the infusion site (23%)., Conclusions: RRx-001 followed by re-challenge with platinum plus etoposide chemotherapy is feasible and associated with promising results., Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02489903.

Nearly all patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) eventually relapse with chemoresistant disease. The molecular mechanisms driving chemoresistance in SCLC remain un-characterized. Here, we describe whole-exome sequencing of paired SCLC tumor samples procured at diagnosis and relapse from 12 patients, and unpaired relapse samples from 18 additional patients. Multiple somatic copy number alterations, including gains in ABCC1 and deletions in MYCL, MSH2, and MSH6, are identifiable in relapsed samples. Relapse samples also exhibit recurrent mutations and loss of heterozygosity in regulators of WNT signaling, including CHD8 and APC. Analysis of RNA-sequencing data shows enrichment for an ASCL1-low expression subtype and WNT activation in relapse samples. Activation of WNT signaling in chemosensitive human SCLC cell lines through APC knockdown induces chemoresistance. Additionally, in vitro-derived chemoresistant cell lines demonstrate increased WNT activity. Overall, our results suggest WNT signaling activation as a mechanism of chemoresistance in relapsed SCLC.

Background: Dysregulation of the Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducers and activators of transcription pathway contributes to abnormal inflammatory responses and poor prognosis in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated the JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib plus pemetrexed/cisplatin first-line in patients with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent nonsquamous NSCLC with systemic inflammation (modified Glasgow prognostic score [mGPS] 1/2)., Patients and Methods: Part 1 was an open-label, safety run-in, in which we assessed ruxolitinib (15 mg twice daily [b.i.d.]) plus pemetrexed (500 mg/m 2 intravenous, day 1) and cisplatin (75 mg/m 2 intravenous, day 1). Ruxolitinib dose selection for part 2 required <3 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) for 9 evaluable patients. In part 2 patients were randomized to ruxolitinib or placebo (each plus pemetrexed/cisplatin). The trial terminated early for reasons unrelated to this trial., Results: Fifteen patients enrolled in part 1 (median age, 64 years; 80% male, 80% mGPS 1) received ruxolitinib 15 mg b.i.d. plus pemetrexed/cisplatin. Median treatment duration was 140 days and no DLTs occurred in 11 evaluable patients. No new safety concerns arose when ruxolitinib was combined with pemetrexed/cisplatin. At study termination, 39 patients were randomized to ruxolitinib and 37 to placebo in part 2. Median treatment duration was 43 days. Response rate was 31% (12 of 39) with ruxolitinib and 35% (13 of 37) with placebo (all partial responses)., Conclusion: Ruxolitinib 15 mg b.i.d. had an acceptable safety profile in combination with pemetrexed/cisplatin asfirst-line treatment of patients with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent nonsquamous NSCLC and systemic inflammation. Early study termination limited the interpretation of efficacy data in the randomized phase II part of the study., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose Both temozolomide (TMZ) and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are active in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). This phase II, randomized, double-blind study evaluated whether addition of the PARP inhibitor veliparib to TMZ improves 4-month progression-free survival (PFS). Patients and Methods A total of 104 patients with recurrent SCLC were randomly assigned 1:1 to oral veliparib or placebo 40 mg twice daily, days 1 to 7, and oral TMZ 150 to 200 mg/m 2 /day, days 1 to 5, of a 28-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Response was determined by imaging at weeks 4 and 8, and every 8 weeks thereafter. Improvement in PFS at 4 months was the primary end point. Secondary objectives included overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety and tolerability of veliparib with TMZ. Exploratory objectives included PARP-1 and SLFN11 immunohistochemical expression, MGMT promoter methylation, and circulating tumor cell quantification. Results No significant difference in 4-month PFS was noted between TMZ/veliparib (36%) and TMZ/placebo (27%; P = .19); median OS was also not improved significantly with TMZ/veliparib (8.2 months; 95% CI, 6.4 to 12.2 months; v 7.0 months; 95% CI, 5.3 to 9.5 months; P = .50). However, ORR was significantly higher in patients receiving TMZ/veliparib compared with TMZ/placebo (39% v 14%; P = .016). Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia more commonly occurred with TMZ/veliparib: 50% versus 9% and 31% versus 7%, respectively. Significantly prolonged PFS (5.7 v 3.6 months; P = .009) and OS (12.2 v 7.5 months; P = .014) were observed in patients with SLFN11-positive tumors treated with TMZ/veliparib. Conclusion Four-month PFS and median OS did not differ between the two arms, whereas a significant improvement in ORR was observed with TMZ/veliparib. SLFN11 expression was associated with improved PFS and OS in patients receiving TMZ/veliparib, suggesting a promising biomarker of PARP-inhibitor sensitivity in SCLC.

Background: Data on the prevalence of brain metastases at presentation in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are limited. We queried the National Cancer Data Base to determine prevalence, clinical risk factors, and outcomes of patients with NSCLC presenting with brain metastases., Patients and Methods: Patients with NSCLC diagnosed between 2010 and 2012 were identified using the National Cancer Data Base. The risk of brain metastases for individual variables was summarized by odds ratios and calculated using logistic regression analysis. The Kaplan-Meier product limit method was used to calculate the median and 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival (OS)., Results: Brain metastases were observed in 47,546 (10.4%) of the 457,481 patients with NSCLC overall. The prevalence of brain metastases was much higher (26%) in patients with stage IV disease at presentation. On multivariate analysis, younger age, adenocarcinoma or large cell histology, tumor size > 3 cm, tumor grade ≥ II, and node-positive disease were associated with brain metastases. The prevalence of brain metastases ranged from as low as 0.57% in patients with only 1 risk factor to as high as 22% in patients with all 5 risk factors. The median and 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS for patients with brain metastases were 6 months and 29.9%, 14.3%, and 8.4%, respectively, with the 3-year OS increasing to 36.2% in those with T1/2 and N0/1 undergoing surgery for the primary site., Conclusions: In patients with NSCLC, the risk of brain metastases at presentation may be calculated based on 5 clinical variables. Selected patients with brain metastases at presentation may achieve prolonged benefit., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Evaluate safety and determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of ensartinib (X-396), a potent anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), and evaluate preliminary pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity in a first-in-human, phase I/II clinical trial primarily in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods: In dose escalation, ensartinib was administered at doses of 25 to 250 mg once daily in patients with advanced solid tumors; in dose expansion, patients with advanced ALK -positive NSCLC were administered 225 mg once daily. Patients who had received prior ALK TKI(s) and patients with brain metastases were eligible. Results: Thirty-seven patients enrolled in dose escalation, and 60 enrolled in dose expansion. The most common treatment-related toxicities were rash (56%), nausea (36%), pruritus (28%), vomiting (26%), and fatigue (22%); 23% of patients experienced a treatment-related grade 3 to 4 toxicity (primarily rash and pruritus). The maximum tolerated dose was not reached, but the RP2D was chosen as 225 mg based on the frequency of rash observed at 250 mg without improvement in activity. Among the ALK -positive efficacy evaluable patients treated at ≥200 mg, the response rate (RR) was 60%, and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.2 months. RR in ALK TKI-naïve patients was 80%, and median PFS was 26.2 months. In patients with prior crizotinib only, the RR was 69% and median PFS was 9.0 months. Responses were also observed in the central nervous system, with an intracranial RR of 64%. Conclusions: Ensartinib was active and generally well tolerated in patients with ALK -positive NSCLC. Clin Cancer Res; 24(12); 2771-9. ©2018 AACR ., (©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors harbor anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( ALK) gene fusions benefit from treatment with ALK inhibitors (ALKi). Analysis of cell-free circulating tumor DNA (cfDNA) may provide a noninvasive way to identify ALK fusions and actionable resistance mechanisms without an invasive biopsy. Patients and Methods: The Guardant360 (G360; Guardant Health) deidentified database of NSCLC cases was queried to identify 88 consecutive patients with 96 plasma-detected ALK fusions. G360 is a clinical cfDNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) test that detects point mutations, select copy number gains, fusions, insertions, and deletions in plasma. Results: Identified fusion partners included EML4 (85.4%), STRN (6%), and KCNQ, KLC1, KIF5B, PPM1B , and TGF (totaling 8.3%). Forty-two ALK -positive patients had no history of targeted therapy (cohort 1), with tissue ALK molecular testing attempted in 21 (5 negative, 5 positive, and 11 tissue insufficient). Follow-up of 3 of the 5 tissue-negative patients showed responses to ALKi. Thirty-one patients were tested at known or presumed ALKi progression (cohort 2); 16 samples (53%) contained 1 to 3 ALK resistance mutations. In 13 patients, clinical status was unknown (cohort 3), and no resistance mutations or bypass pathways were identified. In 6 patients with known EGFR- activating mutations, an ALK fusion was identified on progression (cohort 4; 4 STRN , 1 EML4; one both STRN and EML4 ); five harbored EGFR T790M. Conclusions: In this cohort of cfDNA-detected ALK fusions, we demonstrate that comprehensive cfDNA NGS provides a noninvasive means of detecting targetable alterations and characterizing resistance mechanisms on progression. Clin Cancer Res; 24(12); 2758-70. ©2018 AACR ., (©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Introduction: Percutaneous image-guided ablation is an emerging minimally invasive therapy for patients with metastatic bone disease for whom radiation therapy is ineffective or contraindicated. The purpose of this study was to examine the safety and efficacy of percutaneous ablation in achieving pain palliation and local tumor control of osseous metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: A retrospective review was performed of 76 musculoskeletal metastases in 45 patients treated with percutaneous ablation. 63% (48/76) were treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA), 35% (27/76) with cryoablation, and 1.3% (1/76) with microwave ablation (MWA). In 70% (53/76) of cases, associated cementoplasty was performed. Primary outcomes measured were pre- and post-procedure pain scores 4 weeks after treatment and local tumor control at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up., Results: Mean age of the cohort was 63.6 ± 9.5 years. Median tumor diameter was 3.60 cm (range 1.0-10.0 cm). Mean and median pain scores before treatment were 7.5 ± 2.3 and 8.0, respectively. Post-procedure, patients reported significantly decreased pain scores at 4 weeks (mean, 3.7 ± 3.5; median, 3.0; p < 0.00001). Radiographic local tumor control rates were 83% (35/42) at 3 months, 77% (23/30) at 6 months, and 68% (17/25) at 12 months after treatment. The overall complication rate was 2.6% (2/76)., Conclusion: Percutaneous tumor ablation is a well-tolerated, minimally invasive procedure associated with improving pain palliation and achieving local tumor control of osseous metastases from NSCLC., Level of Evidence: Level 4, case series.

Background: Although adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in patients with completely resected NSCLC, it is also associated with potentially disabling or lethal adverse events. Because there is limited information on the early mortality among patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy, we used the National Cancer Database to calculate the percentage of deaths within the first 6 months of starting chemotherapy., Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients age 18 or older in whom stage IB to IIIA NSCLC had been diagnosed between 2004 and 2012 and who had received multiagent adjuvant chemotherapy starting within 120 days from the surgical resection with negative surgical margins. Age groups were divided as follows: younger than 50, 51 to 60, 61 to 70, 71 to 80, and older than 80 years., Results: A total of 19,691 patients met the eligibility criteria, 19,398 of whom had a known 6-month mortality status. The median age was 65 years (range 19-89). The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-month cumulative mortality rates from initiation of chemotherapy were 0.7%, 1.3%, 1.9%, 2.6%, 3.2%, and 4.1% respectively. The 6-month mortality rates for each age group (≤ 50 years, 51-60, 61-70, 71-80, and >80) were 2.6%, 3.1%, 4.1%, 5.3%, and 7.6%, respectively (p < 0.001). Independent factors associated with increased 6-month mortality included age 71 to 80 versus younger than 50 (OR = 1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-2.55, p = 0.007), age older than 80 versus younger than 50 (OR = 2.43, 95% CI: 1.40-4.20, p = 0.002), male sex (OR = 1.42; 95% CI: 1.21-1.67, p < 0.001), Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score of 2 versus 0 (OR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.22-1.89, p < 0.001), pneumonectomy (OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.11-1.73, p = 0.004), length of postopertive stay longer than 6 days after surgery (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.03-1.41, p = 0.02), and readmission within 30 days from surgery (OR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.15-1.90, p = 0.02)., Conclusions: Early mortality with the use of adjuvant chemotherapy after complete resection of NSCLC is a clinical concern. The risk is higher in patients older than 70 years, with higher comorbidity scores and a prolonged length of stay postoperatively., (Copyright © 2018 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Influenza leads to significant morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy may not mount an adequate immune response to the vaccine. We performed this pilot study to evaluate the immunogenicity of influenza vaccination in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy., Materials and Methods: During the 2011 to 2012 influenza season, patients undergoing chemotherapy for solid tumors were given trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine either on the day of chemotherapy (schedule A) or a week before chemotherapy (schedule B) by a single 0.5 mL injection in the deltoid muscle region. This was not a randomized trial. Hemagglutination inhibition assays were performed on blood samples from these patients taken at baseline, and 4 weeks postvaccination. Seroconversion rate (>4-fold increase in titers) and seroprotection rates (postvaccination titers of >1:40) were calculated for each vaccine component: influenza A (H1N1), A (H3N2) and B., Results: A total of 18 patients received influenza vaccination as part of this pilot study. Of these, 8 patients received the vaccine on schedule A and 10 patients received the vaccine on schedule B. Geometric mean titers against each strain significantly improved after vaccination for both groups, as measured by signed rank test. Seroconversion to at least 1 strain was observed in 75% of patients on schedule A, and 70% of patients vaccinated on schedule B. Seroprotection to at least 1 strain was observed in 100% of patients in the schedule A group, and 60% of patients vaccinated on schedule B. Seroconversion and seroprotection rates against the 3 influenza strains were not significantly different between the 2 groups., Conclusions: Patients with nonhematological malignancies who are receiving chemotherapy mount an immune response to influenza vaccination. Timing of influenza vaccination in relation to chemotherapy does not seem to matter.

Purpose: Multiplex genomic profiling is standard of care for patients with advanced lung adenocarcinomas. The Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium (LCMC) is a multi-institutional effort to identify and treat oncogenic driver events in patients with lung adenocarcinomas. Experimental Design: Sixteen U.S. institutions enrolled 1,367 patients with lung cancer in LCMC2; 904 were deemed eligible and had at least one of 14 cancer-related genes profiled using validated methods including genotyping, massively parallel sequencing, and IHC. Results: The use of targeted therapies in patients with EGFR, ERBB2, or BRAF p.V600E mutations, ALK, ROS1 , or RET rearrangements, or MET amplification was associated with a survival increment of 1.5 years compared with those with such mutations not receiving targeted therapy, and 1.0 year compared with those lacking a targetable driver. Importantly, 60 patients with a history of smoking derived similar survival benefit from targeted therapy for alterations in EGFR / ALK / ROS1 , when compared with 75 never smokers with the same alterations. In addition, coexisting TP53 mutations were associated with shorter survival among patients with EGFR, ALK , or ROS1 alterations. Conclusion: Patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung and an oncogenic driver mutation treated with effective targeted therapy have a longer survival, regardless of prior smoking history. Molecular testing should be performed on all individuals with lung adenocarcinomas irrespective of clinical characteristics. Routine use of massively parallel sequencing enables detection of both targetable driver alterations and tumor suppressor gene and other alterations that have potential significance for therapy selection and as predictive markers for the efficacy of treatment. Clin Cancer Res; 24(5); 1038-47. ©2017 AACR ., (©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Objective: We used brain radiotherapy as a surrogate for the presence of brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to determine the prevalence of brain metastases using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database., Methods: Patients with NSCLC diagnosed between 1988 and 1997 were subdivided according to brain radiotherapy status at presentation into: "none" or "radiation therapy indicated." We calculated the frequency of brain radiotherapy use in all patients. Odds ratios (ORs) for the indication of brain radiotherapy were calculated for individual prespecified covariates of interest. All statistical tests were 2-sided and P<0.05 were considered significant., Results: At presentation, brain radiotherapy was indicated in 10,963 (8.3%) of the 131,456 patients diagnosed with NSCLC between 1988 and 1997. On multivariable analysis the following were significantly associated with brain radiotherapy use: age (OR, 0.653 per 10 y increase in age; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.642, 0.665); female sex (OR, 1.05; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.10]); adenocarcinoma histology (HR, 1.67; 95% CI: 1.58, 1.76) or large cell or other histology (OR, 1.67; 95% CI: 1.57, 1.77); tumor size>3 cm (3.1 to 5 cm OR, 1.22; 95% CI: 1.14, 1.30 and >5 cm OR, 1.25; 95% CI: 1.17, 1.33); tumor grade >II (grade III OR, 1.82; 95% CI: 1.69, 1.95 and grade IV OR, 1.91; 95% CI: 1.73, 2.11); and nodal involvement N1 (OR, 1.33; 95% CI: 1.20, 1.47), N2 (OR, 2.24; 95% CI: 2.10, 2.40), and N3 (OR, 2.39; 95% CI: 2.19, 2.60)., Conclusions: Brain radiotherapy is indicated in over 8% of patients with NSCLC at presentation. We demonstrated that the risk of brain metastasis at presentation may be stratified with the use of 6 clinical factors.