Search

Your search keyword '"Waller, D. A."' showing total 1,443 results
Start Over Author "Waller, D. A."
1,443 results on '"Waller, D. A."'

1. Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction as the Treatment of Choice versus Robotic-Assisted Lung Volume Reduction Surgery in Similar Patients with Emphysema – An Initial Experience of the Benefits and Complications

Author

Lee M, Dhanji AR, Perikleous P, Baranowski R, Lau KKW, and Waller D

Subjects
lung volume reduction, lung volume reduction surgery, bronchoscopic lung volume reduction, endobronchial valve, emphysema, Diseases of the respiratory system, RC705-779
Abstract

Michelle Lee, Al-Rehan Dhanji, Periklis Perikleous, Ralitsa Baranowski, Kelvin Kar Wing Lau, David Waller Department of Thoracic Surgery, Barts Thorax Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, UKCorrespondence: Michelle Lee, Department of Thoracic Surgery, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, West Smithfield, London, United Kingdom, Email m.lee7@nhs.netObjective: There is an assumption that because EBLVR requires less use of hospital resources, offsetting the higher cost of endobronchial valves, it should therefore be the treatment of choice wherever possible. We have tested this hypothesis in a retrospective analysis of the two in similar groups of patients.Methods: In a 4-year experience, we performed 177 consecutive LVR procedures: 83 patients underwent Robot Assisted Thoracoscopic (RATS) LVRS and 94 EBLVR. EBLVR was intentionally precluded by evidence of incomplete fissure integrity or intra-operative assessment of collateral ventilation. Unilateral RATS LVRS was performed in these cases together with those with unsuitable targets for EBLVR.Results: EBLVR was uncomplicated in 37 (39%) cases; complicated by post-procedure spontaneous pneumothorax (SP) in 28(30%) and required revision in 29 (31%). In the LVRS group, 7 (8%) patients were readmitted with treatment-related complications, but no revisional procedure was needed. When compared with uncomplicated EBLVR, LVRS had a significantly longer operating time: 85 (14– 82) vs 40 (15– 151) minutes (p< 0.001) and hospital stay: 7.5 (2– 80) vs 2 (1– 14) days (p< 0.01). However, LVRS had a similar total operating time to both EBLVR requiring revision: 78 (38– 292) minutes and hospital stay to EBLVR complicated by pneumothorax of 11.5 (6.5– 24.25) days. Use of critical care was significantly longer in RATS group, and it was also significantly longer in EBV with SP group than in uncomplicated EBV group.Conclusion: Endobronchial LVR does use less hospital resources than RATS LVRS in comparable groups if the recovery is uncomplicated. However, this advantage is lost if one includes the resources needed for the treatment of complications and revisional procedures. Any decision to favour EBLVR over LVRS should not be based on the assumption of a smoother, faster perioperative course.Keywords: lung volume reduction, lung volume reduction surgery, bronchoscopic lung volume reduction, endobronchial valve, emphysema

Published
2024

2. Magnetometry

Author

Waller, D., Strauss, B. E., Chauhan, Prakash, Section editor, Chauhan, Mamta, Section editor, and Cudnik, Brian, editor

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Search for $hep$ solar neutrinos and the diffuse supernova neutrino background using all three phases of the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory

Author

Aharmim, B., Ahmed, S. N., Anthony, A. E., Barros, N., Beier, E. W., Bellerive, A., Beltran, B., Bergevin, M., Biller, S. D., Blucher, E., Bonventre, R., Boudjemline, K., Boulay, M. G., Cai, B., Callaghan, E. J., Caravaca, J., Chan, Y. D., Chauhan, D., Chen, M., Cleveland, B. T., Cox, G. A., Dai, X., Deng, H., Descamps, F. B., Detwiler, J. A., Doe, P. J., Doucas, G., Drouin, P. -L., Dunford, M., Elliott, S. R., Evans, H. C., Ewan, G. T., Farine, J., Fergani, H., Fleurot, F., Ford, R. J., Formaggio, J. A., Gagnon, N., Gilje, K., Goon, J. TM., Graham, K., Guillian, E., Habib, S., Hahn, R. L., Hallin, A. L., Hallman, E. D., Harvey, P. J., Hazama, R., Heintzelman, W. J., Heise, J., Helmer, R. L., Hime, A., Howard, C., Huang, M., Jagam, P., Jamieson, B., Jelley, N. A., Jerkins, M., Keeter, K. J., Klein, J. R., Kormos, L. L., Kos, M., Kraus, C., Krauss, C. B., Krüger, A., Kutter, T., Kyba, C. C. M., Labe, K., Land, B. J., Lange, R., LaTorre, A., Law, J., Lawson, I. T., Lesko, K. T., Leslie, J. R., Levine, I., Loach, J. C., MacLellan, R., Majerus, S., Mak, H. B., Maneira, J., Martin, R. D., Mastbaum, A., McCauley, N., McDonald, A. B., McGee, S. R., Miller, M. L., Monreal, B., Monroe, J., Nickel, B. G., Noble, A. J., O'Keeffe, H. M., Oblath, N. S., Okada, C. E., Ollerhead, R. W., Gann, G. D. Orebi, Oser, S. M., Ott, R. A., Peeters, S. J. M., Poon, A. W. P., Prior, G., Reitzner, S. D., Rielage, K., Robertson, B. C., Robertson, R. G. H., Schwendener, M. H., Secrest, J. A., Seibert, S. R., Simard, O., Sinclair, D., Skensved, P., Sonley, T. J., Stonehill, L. C., Tešić, G., Tolich, N., Tsui, T., Van Berg, R., VanDevender, B. A., Virtue, C. J., Wall, B. L., Waller, D., Tseung, H. Wan Chan, Wark, D. L., Wendland, J., West, N., Wilkerson, J. F., Wilson, J. R., Winchester, T., Wright, A., Yeh, M., Zhang, F., and Zuber, K.

Subjects
High Energy Physics - Experiment, Nuclear Experiment
Abstract

A search has been performed for neutrinos from two sources, the $hep$ reaction in the solar $pp$ fusion chain and the $\nu_e$ component of the diffuse supernova neutrino background (DSNB), using the full dataset of the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory with a total exposure of 2.47 kton-years after fiducialization. The $hep$ search is performed using both a single-bin counting analysis and a likelihood fit. We find a best-fit flux that is compatible with solar model predictions while remaining consistent with zero flux, and set a one-sided upper limit of $\Phi_{hep} < 30\times10^{3}~\mathrm{cm}^{-2}~\mathrm{s}^{-1}$ [90% credible interval (CI)]. No events are observed in the DSNB search region, and we set an improved upper bound on the $\nu_e$ component of the DSNB flux of $\Phi^\mathrm{DSNB}_{\nu_e} < 19~\textrm{cm}^{-2}~\textrm{s}^{-1}$ (90% CI) in the energy range $22.9 < E_\nu < 36.9$~MeV., Comment: 11 pages, 6 figures

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

4. Cosmogenic Neutron Production at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory

Author

Aharmim, B., Ahmed, S. N., Anthony, A. E., Barros, N., Beier, E. W., Bellerive, A., Beltran, B., Bergevin, M., Biller, S. D., Bonventre, R., Boudjemline, K., Boulay, M. G., Cai, B., Callaghan, E. J., Caravaca, J., Chan, Y. D., Chauhan, D., Chen, M., Cleveland, B. T., Cox, G. A., Curley, R., Dai, X., Deng, H., Descamps, F. B., Detwiler, J. A., Doe, P. J., Doucas, G., Drouin, P. -L., Dunford, M., Elliott, S. R., Evans, H. C., Ewan, G. T., Farine, J., Fergani, H., Fleurot, F., Ford, R. J., Formaggio, J. A., Gagnon, N., Gilje, K., Goon, J. TM., Graham, K., Guillian, E., Habib, S., Hahn, R. L., Hallin, A. L., Hallman, E. D., Harvey, P. J., Hazama, R., Heintzelman, W. J., Heise, J., Helmer, R. L., Hime, A., Howard, C., Huang, M., Jagam, P., Jamieson, B., Jelley, N. A., Jerkins, M., Kéfélian, C., Keeter, K. J., Klein, J. R., Kormos, L. L., Kos, M., Kr\u, A., Kraus, C., Krauss, C. B., Kutter, T., Kyba, C. C. M., Land, B. J., Lange, R., Law, J., Lawson, I. T., Lesko, K. T., Leslie, J. R., Levine, I., Loach, J. C., MacLellan, R., Majerus, S., Mak, H. B., Maneira, J., Martin, R. D., Mastbaum, A., McCauley, N., McDonald, A. B., McGee, S. R., Miller, M. L., Monreal, B., Monroe, J., Nickel, B. G., Noble, A. J., O'Keeffe, H. M., Oblath, N. S., Okada, C. E., Ollerhead, R. W., Gann, G. D. Orebi, Oser, S. M., Ott, R. A., Peeters, S. J. M., Poon, A. W. P., Prior, G., Reitzner, S. D., Rielage, K., Robertson, B. C., Robertson, R. G. H., Schwendener, M. H., Secrest, J. A., Seibert, S. R., Simard, O., Sinclair, D., Skensved, P., Sonley, T. J., Stonehill, L. C., Teš, G., Tolich, N., Tsui, T., Van Berg, R., VanDevender, B. A., Virtue, C. J., Wall, B. L., Waller, D., Tseung, H. Wan Chan, Wark, D. L., Wendland, J., West, N., Wilkerson, J. F., Wilson, J. R., Winchester, T., Wright, A., Yeh, M., Zhang, F., and Zuber, K.

Subjects
High Energy Physics - Experiment, Nuclear Experiment
Abstract

Neutrons produced in nuclear interactions initiated by cosmic-ray muons present an irreducible background to many rare-event searches, even in detectors located deep underground. Models for the production of these neutrons have been tested against previous experimental data, but the extrapolation to deeper sites is not well understood. Here we report results from an analysis of cosmogenically produced neutrons at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory. A specific set of observables are presented, which can be used to benchmark the validity of GEANT4 physics models. In addition, the cosmogenic neutron yield, in units of $10^{-4}\;\text{cm}^{2}/\left(\text{g}\cdot\mu\right)$, is measured to be $7.28 \pm 0.09\;\text{stat.} ^{+1.59}_{-1.12}\;\text{syst.}$ in pure heavy water and $7.30 \pm 0.07\;\text{stat.} ^{+1.40}_{-1.02}\;\text{syst.}$ in NaCl-loaded heavy water. These results provide unique insights into this potential background source for experiments at SNOLAB.

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

5. Measurement of neutron production in atmospheric neutrino interactions at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory

Author

SNO Collaboration, Aharmim, B., Ahmed, S. N., Anthony, A. E., Barros, N., Beier, E. W., Bellerive, A., Beltran, B., Bergevin, M., Biller, S. D., Bonventre, R., Boudjemline, K., Boulay, M. G., Cai, B., Callaghan, E. J., Caravaca, J., Chan, Y. D., Chauhan, D., Chen, M., Cleveland, B. T., Cox, G. A., Dai, X., Deng, H., Descamps, F. B., Detwiler, J. A., Doe, P. J., Doucas, G., Drouin, P. -L., Dunford, M., Elliott, S. R., Evans, H. C., Ewan, G. T., Farine, J., Fergani, H., Fleurot, F., Ford, R. J., Formaggio, J. A., Gagnon, N., Gilje, K., Goon, J. TM., Graham, K., Guillian, E., Habib, S., Hahn, R. L., Hallin, A. L., Hallman, E. D., Harvey, P. J., Hazama, R., Heintzelman, W. J., Heise, J., Helmer, R. L., Hime, A., Howard, C., Huang, M., Jagam, P., Jamieson, B., Jelley, N. A., Jerkins, M., Keeter, K. J., Klein, J. R., Kormos, L. L., Kos, M., Kruger, A., Kraus, C., Krauss, C. B., Kutter, T., Kyba, C. C. M., Land, B. J., Lange, R., Law, J., Lawson, I. T., Lesko, K. T., Leslie, J. R., Levine, I., Loach, J. C., MacLellan, R., Majerus, S., Mak, H. B., Maneira, J., Martin, R. D., Mastbaum, A., McCauley, N., McDonald, A. B., McGee, S. R., Miller, M. L., Monreal, B., Monroe, J., Nickel, B. G., Noble, A. J., O'Keeffe, H. M., Oblath, N. S., Okada, C. E., Ollerhead, R. W., Gann, G. D. Orebi, Oser, S. M., Ott, R. A., Peeters, S. J. M., Poon, A. W. P., Prior, G., Reitzner, S. D., Rielage, K., Robertson, B. C., Robertson, R. G. H., Schwendener, M. H., Secrest, J. A., Seibert, S. R., Simard, O., Sinclair, D., Singh, J., Skensved, P., Smiley, M., Sonley, T. J., Stonehill, L. C., Tesic, G., Tolich, N., Tsui, T., Van Berg, R., VanDevender, B. A., Virtue, C. J., Wall, B. L., Waller, D., Tseung, H. Wan Chan, Wark, D. L., Wendland, J., West, N., Wilkerson, J. F., Wilson, J. R., Winchester, T., Wright, A., Yeh, M., Zhang, F., and Zuber, K.

Subjects
High Energy Physics - Experiment
Abstract

Neutron production in GeV-scale neutrino interactions is a poorly studied process. We have measured the neutron multiplicities in atmospheric neutrino interactions in the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory experiment and compared them to the prediction of a Monte Carlo simulation using GENIE and a minimally modified version of GEANT4. We analyzed 837 days of exposure corresponding to Phase I, using pure heavy water, and Phase II, using a mixture of Cl in heavy water. Neutrons produced in atmospheric neutrino interactions were identified with an efficiency of $15.3\%$ and $44.3\%$, for Phase I and II respectively. The neutron production is measured as a function of the visible energy of the neutrino interaction and, for charged current quasi-elastic interaction candidates, also as a function of the neutrino energy. This study is also performed classifying the complete sample into two pairs of event categories: charged current quasi-elastic and non charged current quasi-elastic, and $\nu_{\mu}$ and $\nu_e$. Results show good overall agreement between data and Monte Carlo for both phases, with some small tension with a statistical significance below $2\sigma$ for some intermediate energies.

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

6. Constraints on Neutrino Lifetime from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory

Author

SNO Collaboration, Aharmim, B., Ahmed, S. N., Anthony, A. E., Barros, N., Beier, E. W., Bellerive, A., Beltran, B., Bergevin, M., Biller, S. D., Bonventre, R., Boudjemline, K., Boulay, M. G., Cai, B., Callaghan, E. J., Caravaca, J., Chan, Y. D., Chauhan, D., Chen, M., Cleveland, B. T., Cox, G. A., Dai, X., Deng, H., Descamps, F. B., Detwiler, J. A., Doe, P. J., Doucas, G., Drouin, P. -L., Dunford, M., Elliott, S. R., Evans, H. C., Ewan, G. T., Farine, J., Fergani, H., Fleurot, F., Ford, R. J., Formaggio, J. A., Gagnon, N., Gilje, K., Goon, J. TM., Graham, K., Guillian, E., Habib, S., Hahn, R. L., Hallin, A. L., Hallman, E. D., Harvey, P. J., Hazama, R., Heintzelman, W. J., Heise, J., Helmer, R. L., Hime, A., Howard, C., Huang, M., Jagam, P., Jamieson, B., Jelley, N. A., Jerkins, M., Kéfélian, C., Keeter, K. J., Klein, J. R., Kormos, L. L., Kos, M., Krüger, A., Kraus, C., Krauss, C. B., Kutter, T., Kyba, C. C. M., Land, B. J., Lange, R., Law, J., Lawson, I. T., Lesko, K. T., Leslie, J. R., Levine, I., Loach, J. C., MacLellan, R., Majerus, S., Mak, H. B., Maneira, J., Martin, R. D., Mastbaum, A., McCauley, N., McDonald, A. B., McGee, S. R., Miller, M. L., Monreal, B., Monroe, J., Nickel, B. G., Noble, A. J., O'Keeffe, H. M., Oblath, N. S., Okada, C. E., Ollerhead, R. W., Gann, G. D. Orebi, Oser, S. M., Ott, R. A., Peeters, S. J. M., Poon, A. W. P., Prior, G., Reitzner, S. D., Rielage, K., Robertson, B. C., Robertson, R. G. H., Schwendener, M. H., Secrest, J. A., Seibert, S. R., Simard, O., Sinclair, D., Skensved, P., Sonley, T. J., Stonehill, L. C., Tešić, G., Tolich, N., Tsui, T., Van Berg, R., VanDevender, B. A., Virtue, C. J., Wall, B. L., Waller, D., Tseung, H. Wan Chan, Wark, D. L., Wendland, J., West, N., Wilkerson, J. F., Wilson, J. R., Winchester, T., Wright, A., Yeh, M., Zhang, F., and Zuber, K.

Subjects
High Energy Physics - Experiment, Nuclear Experiment
Abstract

The long baseline between the Earth and the Sun makes solar neutrinos an excellent test beam for exploring possible neutrino decay. The signature of such decay would be an energy-dependent distortion of the traditional survival probability which can be fit for using well-developed and high precision analysis methods. Here a model including neutrino decay is fit to all three phases of $^8$B solar neutrino data taken by the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory. This fit constrains the lifetime of neutrino mass state $\nu_2$ to be ${>8.08\times10^{-5}}$ s/eV at $90\%$ confidence. An analysis combining this SNO result with those from other solar neutrino experiments results in a combined limit for the lifetime of mass state $\nu_2$ of ${>1.04\times10^{-3}}$ s/eV at $99\%$ confidence.

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

7. Tests of Lorentz invariance at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory

Author

SNO Collaboration, Aharmim, B., Ahmed, S. N., Anthony, A. E., Barros, N., Beier, E. W., Bellerive, A., Beltran, B., Bergevin, M., Biller, S. D., Blucher, E., Bonventre, R., Boudjemline, K., Boulay, M. G., Cai, B., Callaghan, E. J., Caravaca, J., Chan, Y. D., Chauhan, D., Chen, M., Cleveland, B. T., Cox, G. A., Dai, X., Deng, H., Descamps, F. B., Detwiler, J. A., Doe, P. J., Doucas, G., Drouin, P. -L., Dunford, M., Elliott, S. R., Evans, H. C., Ewan, G. T., Farine, J., Fergani, H., Fleurot, F., Ford, R. J., Formaggio, J. A., Gagnon, N., Gilje, K., Goon, J. TM., Graham, K., Guillian, E., Habib, S., Hahn, R. L., Hallin, A. L., Hallman, E. D., Harvey, P. J., Hazama, R., Heintzelman, W. J., Heise, J., Helmer, R. L., Hime, A., Howard, C., Huang, M., Jagam, P., Jamieson, B., Jelley, N. A., Jerkins, M., Kefelian, C., Keeter, K. J., Klein, J. R., Kormos, L. L., Kos, M., Kruger, A., Kraus, C., Krauss, C. B., Kutter, T., Kyba, C. C. M., Labe, K., Land, B. J., Lange, R., LaTorre, A., Law, J., Lawson, I. T., Lesko, K. T., Leslie, J. R., Levine, I., Loach, J. C., MacLellan, R., Majerus, S., Mak, H. B., Maneira, J., Martin, R. D., Mastbaum, A., McCauley, N., McDonald, A. B., McGee, S. R., Miller, M. L., Monreal, B., Monroe, J., Nickel, B. G., Noble, A. J., O'Keeffe, H. M., Oblath, N. S., Okada, C. E., Ollerhead, R. W., Gann, G. D. Orebi, Oser, S. M., Ott, R. A., Peeters, S. J. M., Poon, A. W. P., Prior, G., Reitzner, S. D., Rielage, K., Robertson, B. C., Robertson, R. G. H., Schwendener, M. H., Secrest, J. A., Seibert, S. R., Simard, O., Sinclair, D., Skensved, P., Sonley, T. J., Stonehill, L. C., Tesic, G., Tolich, N., Tsui, T., Van Berg, R., VanDevender, B. A., Virtue, C. J., Wall, B. L., Waller, D., Tseung, H. Wan Chan, Wark, D. L., Wendland, J., West, N., Wilkerson, J. F., Winchester, T., Wilson, J. R., Wright, A., Yeh, M., Zhang, F., and Zuber, K.

Subjects
High Energy Physics - Experiment, Nuclear Experiment
Abstract

Experimental tests of Lorentz symmetry in systems of all types are critical for ensuring that the basic assumptions of physics are well-founded. Data from all phases of the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, a kiloton-scale heavy water Cherenkov detector, are analyzed for possible violations of Lorentz symmetry in the neutrino sector. Such violations would appear as one of eight possible signal types in the detector: six seasonal variations in the solar electron neutrino survival probability differing in energy and time dependence, and two shape changes to the oscillated solar neutrino energy spectrum. No evidence for such signals is observed, and limits on the size of such effects are established in the framework of the Standard Model Extension, including 40 limits on perviously unconstrained operators and improved limits on 15 additional operators. This makes limits on all minimal, Dirac-type Lorentz violating operators in the neutrino sector available for the first time.

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

8. The search for neutron-antineutron oscillations at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory

Author

SNO Collaboration, Aharmim, B., Ahmed, S. N., Anthony, A. E., Barros, N., Beier, E. W., Bellerive, A., Beltran, B., Bergevin, M., Biller, S. D., Boudjemline, K., Boulay, M. G., Cai, B., Chan, Y. D., Chauhan, D., Chen, M., Cleveland, B. T., Cox, G. A., Dai, X., Deng, H., Detwiler, J. A., Doe, P. J., Doucas, G., Drouin, P. -L., Duncan, F. A., Dunford, M., Earle, E. D., Elliott, S. R., Evans, H. C., Ewan, G. T., Farine, J., Fergani, H., Fleurot, F., Ford, R. J., Formaggio, J. A., Gagnon, N., Goon, J. TM., Graham, K., Guillian, E., Habib, S., Hahn, R. L., Hallin, A. L., Hallman, E. D., Harvey, P. J., Hazama, R., Heintzelman, W. J., Heise, J., Helmer, R. L., Hime, A., Howard, C., Huang, M., Jagam, P., Jamieson, B., Jelley, N. A., Jerkins, M., Keeter, K. J., Klein, J. R., Kormos, L. L., Kos, M., Kruger, A., Kraus, C., Krauss, C. B., Kutter, T., Kyba, C. C. M., Lange, R., Law, J., Lawson, I. T., Lesko, K. T., Leslie, J. R., Levine, I., Loach, J. C., MacLellan, R., Majerus, S., Mak, H. B., Maneira, J., Martin, R. D., McCauley, N., McDonald, A. B., McGee, S. R., Miller, M. L., Monreal, B., Monroe, J., Nickel, B. G., Noble, A. J., O'Keeffe, H. M., Oblath, N. S., Okada, C. E., Ollerhead, R. W., OrebiGann, G. D., Oser, S. M., Ott, R. A., Peeters, S. J. M., Poon, A. W. P., Prior, G., Reitzner, S. D., Rielage, K., Robertson, B. C., Robertson, R. G. H., Schwendener, M. H., Secrest, J. A., Seibert, S. R., Simard, O., Simpson, J. J., Sinclair, D., Skensved, P., Sonley, T. J., Stonehill, L. C., Tesic, G., Tolich, N., Tsui, T., Van Berg, R., VanDevender, B. A., Virtue, C. J., Wall, B. L., Waller, D., Tseung, H. Wan Chan, Wark, D. L., Wendland, J., West, N., Wilkerson, J. F., Wilson, J. R., Wright, A., Yeh, M., Zhang, F., and Zuber, K.

Subjects
High Energy Physics - Experiment, Nuclear Experiment, Physics - Instrumentation and Detectors
Abstract

Tests on $B-L$ symmetry breaking models are important probes to search for new physics. One proposed model with $\Delta(B-L)=2$ involves the oscillations of a neutron to an antineutron. In this paper a new limit on this process is derived for the data acquired from all three operational phases of the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory experiment. The search was concentrated in oscillations occurring within the deuteron, and 23 events are observed against a background expectation of 30.5 events. These translate to a lower limit on the nuclear lifetime of $1.48\times 10^{31}$ years at 90% confidence level (CL) when no restriction is placed on the signal likelihood space (unbounded). Alternatively, a lower limit on the nuclear lifetime was found to be $1.18\times 10^{31}$ years at 90% CL when the signal was forced into a positive likelihood space (bounded). Values for the free oscillation time derived from various models are also provided in this article. This is the first search for neutron-antineutron oscillation with the deuteron as a target., Comment: 14 pages, 8 figures

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

10. PL03.10 MARS 2: A Multicentre Randomised Trial Comparing (Extended) Pleurectomy Decortication versus No Radical Surgery for Mesothelioma

Author

Lim, E., primary, Waller, D., additional, Lau, K., additional, Steele, J., additional, Pope, A., additional, Ali, C., additional, Bilancia, R., additional, Keni, M., additional, Popat, S., additional, O'Brien, M., additional, Tokaca, N., additional, Maskell, N., additional, Stadon, L., additional, Nakas, A., additional, Fennell, D., additional, Edwards, J., additional, Tenconi, S., additional, Socci, L., additional, Rintoul, R., additional, Wood, K., additional, Stone, A., additional, Muthukumar, D., additional, Ingle, C., additional, Taylor, P., additional, Cove-Smith, L., additional, Califano, R., additional, Summers, Y., additional, Tasigiannopoulos, Z., additional, Bille, A., additional, Shah, R., additional, Fuller, L., additional, Shamash, J., additional, Macnair, A., additional, Mansy, T., additional, Milton, R., additional, Koh, P., additional, Ionescu, A.A., additional, Treece, S., additional, Roy, A., additional, Middleton, G., additional, Kirk, A., additional, Harris, R., additional, Ashton, K., additional, Warnes, B., additional, Bridgeman, E., additional, Joyce, K., additional, Mills, N., additional, Elliott, D., additional, Farrar, N., additional, Stokes, E., additional, Hughes, V., additional, Nicholson, A., additional, and Rogers, C., additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

12. A Search for Astrophysical Burst Signals at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory

Author

Aharmim, B., Ahmed, S. N., Anthony, A. E., Barros, N., Beier, E. W., Bellerive, A., Beltran, B., Bergevin, M., Biller, S. D., Boudjemline, K., Boulay, M. G., Cai, B., Chan, Y. D., Chauhan, D., Chen, M., Cleveland, B. T., Cox, G. A., Dai, X., Deng, H., Detwiler, J. A., DiMarco, M., Diamond, M. D., Doe, P. J., Doucas, G., Drouin, P. -L., Duncan, F. A., Dunford, M., Earle, E. D., Elliott, S. R., Evans, H. C., Ewan, G. T., Farine, J., Fergani, H., Fleurot, F., Ford, R. J., Formaggio, J. A., Gagnon, N., Goon, J. TM., Graham, K., Guillian, E., Habib, S., Hahn, R. L., Hallin, A. L., Hallman, E. D., Harvey, P. J., Hazama, R., Heintzelman, W. J., Heise, J., Helmer, R. L., Hime, A., Howard, C., Huang, M., Jagam, P., Jamieson, B., Jelley, N. A., Jerkins, M., Keeter, K. J., Klein, J. R., Kormos, L. L., Kos, M., Kraus, C., Krauss, C. B., Krueger, A., Kutter, T., Kyba, C. C. M., Lange, R., Law, J., Lawson, I. T., Lesko, K. T., Leslie, J. R., Levine, I., Loach, J. C., MacLellan, R., Majerus, S., Mak, H. B., Maneira, J., Martin, R., McCauley, N., McDonald, A. B., McGee, S. R., Miller, M. L., Monreal, B., Monroe, J., Nickel, B. G., Noble, A. J., O'Keeffe, H. M., Oblath, N. S., Ollerhead, R. W., Gann, G. D. Orebi, Oser, S. M., Ott, R. A., Peeters, S. J. M., Poon, A. W. P., Prior, G., Reitzner, S. D., Rielage, K., Robertson, B. C., Robertson, R. G. H., Schwendener, M. H., Secrest, J. A., Seibert, S. R., Simard, O., Simpson, J. J., Sinclair, D., Skensved, P., Sonley, T. J., Stonehill, L. C., Tesic, G., Tolich, N., Tsui, T., Van Berg, R., VanDevender, B. A., Virtue, C. J., Wall, B. L., Waller, D., Tseung, H. Wan Chan, Wark, D. L., Watson, P. J. S., Wendland, J., West, N., Wilkerson, J. F., Wilson, J. R., Wouters, J. M., Wright, A., Yeh, M., Zhang, F., and Zuber, K.

Subjects
Astrophysics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics, Nuclear Experiment
Abstract

The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO) has confirmed the standard solar model and neutrino oscillations through the observation of neutrinos from the solar core. In this paper we present a search for neutrinos associated with sources other than the solar core, such as gamma-ray bursters and solar flares. We present a new method for looking for temporal coincidences between neutrino events and astrophysical bursts of widely varying intensity. No correlations were found between neutrinos detected in SNO and such astrophysical sources.

Published
2013
Full Text
View/download PDF

13. Measurement of the $\nu_e$ and Total $^{8}$B Solar Neutrino Fluxes with the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory Phase-III Data Set

Author

Aharmim, B., Ahmed, S. N., Amsbaugh, J. F., Anaya, J. M., Anthony, A. E., Banar, J., Barros, N., Beier, E. W., Bellerive, A., Beltran, B., Bergevin, M., Biller, S. D., Boudjemline, K., Boulay, M. G., Bowles, T. J., Browne, M. C., Bullard, T. V., Burritt, T. H., Cai, B., Chan, Y. D., Chauhan, D., Chen, M., Cleveland, B. T., Cox, G. A., Currat, C. A., Dai, X., Deng, H., Detwiler, J. A., DiMarco, M., Doe, P. J., Doucas, G., Dragowsky, M. R., Drouin, P. -L., Duba, C. A., Duncan, F. A., Dunford, M., Earle, E. D., Elliott, S. R., Evans, H. C., Ewan, G. T., Farine, J., Fergani, H., Fleurot, F., Ford, R. J., Formaggio, J. A., Fowler, M. M., Gagnon, N., Germani, J. V., Goldschmidt, A., Goon, J. TM., Graham, K., Guillian, E., Habib, S., Hahn, R. L., Hallin, A. L., Hallman, E. D., Hamian, A. A., Harper, G. C., Harvey, P. J., Hazama, R., Heeger, K. M., Heintzelman, W. J., Heise, J., Helmer, R. L., Henning, R., Hime, A., Howard, C., Howe, M. A., Huang, M., Jagam, P., Jamieson, B., Jelley, N. A., Keeter, K. J., Klein, J. R., Kormos, L. L., Kos, M., Krueger, A., Kraus, C., Krauss, C. B., Kutter, T., Kyba, C. C. M., Lange, R., Law, J., Lawson, I. T., Lesko, K. T., Leslie, J. R., Loach, J. C., MacLellan, R., Majerus, S., Mak, H. B., Maneira, J., Martin, R., McCauley, N., McDonald, A. B., McGee, S. R., Mifflin, C., Miller, G. G., Miller, M. L., Monreal, B., Monroe, J., Morissette, B., Myers, A. W., Nickel, B. G., Noble, A. J., O'Keeffe, H. M., Oblath, N. S., Ollerhead, R. W., Gann, G. D. Orebi, Oser, S. M., Ott, R. A., Peeters, S. J. M., Poon, A. W. P., Prior, G., Reitzner, S. D., Rielage, K., Robertson, B. C., Robertson, R. G. H., Rollin, E., Schwendener, M. H., Secrest, J. A., Seibert, S. R., Simard, O., Simpson, J. J., Skensved, P., Smith, M. W. E., Sonley, T. J., Steiger, T. D., Stonehill, L. C., Tesic, G., Thornewell, P. M., Tolich, N., Tsui, T., Tunnell, C. D., Van Wechel, T., Van Berg, R., VanDevender, B. A., Virtue, C. J., Wall, B. L., Waller, D., Tseung, H. Wan Chan, Wendland, J., West, N., Wilhelmy, J. B., Wilkerson, J. F., Wilson, J. R., Wouters, J. M., Wright, A., Yeh, M., Zhang, F., and Zuber, K.

Subjects
Nuclear Experiment, Astrophysics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics, High Energy Physics - Experiment
Abstract

This paper details the solar neutrino analysis of the 385.17-day Phase-III data set acquired by the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO). An array of $^3$He proportional counters was installed in the heavy-water target to measure precisely the rate of neutrino-deuteron neutral-current interactions. This technique to determine the total active $^8$B solar neutrino flux was largely independent of the methods employed in previous phases. The total flux of active neutrinos was measured to be $5.54^{+0.33}_{-0.31}(stat.)^{+0.36}_{-0.34}(syst.)\times 10^{6}$ cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$, consistent with previous measurements and standard solar models. A global analysis of solar and reactor neutrino mixing parameters yielded the best-fit values of $\Delta m^2 = 7.59^{+0.19}_{-0.21}\times 10^{-5}{eV}^2$ and $\theta = 34.4^{+1.3}_{-1.2}$ degrees., Comment: 104 pages, 26 figures, 20 tables, submitted to Phys. Rev. C

Published
2011
Full Text
View/download PDF

14. Cyclotron effect on coherent spin precession of two-dimensional electrons

Author

Griesbeck, M., Glazov, M. M., Korn, T., Sherman, E. Ya., Waller, D., Reichl, C., Schuh, D., Wegscheider, W., and Schüller, C.

Subjects
Condensed Matter - Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics, Condensed Matter - Materials Science
Abstract

We investigate the spin dynamics of high-mobility two-dimensional electrons in GaAs/AlGaAs quantum wells grown along the $[001]$ and $[110]$ directions by time-resolved Faraday rotation at low temperatures. In measurements on the $(001)$-grown structures without external magnetic fields, we observe coherent oscillations of the electron spin polarization about the effective spin-orbit field. In non-quantizing magnetic fields applied normal to the sample plane, the cyclotron motion of the electrons rotates the effective spin-orbit field. This rotation leads to fast oscillations in the spin polarization about a non-zero value and a strong increase in the spin dephasing time in our experiments. These two effects are absent in the $(110)$-grown structure due to the different symmetry of its effective spin-orbit field. The measurements are in excellent agreement with our theoretical model., Comment: 4 pages, 3 figures

Published
2009
Full Text
View/download PDF

25. Natural history of relapsed myeloma, refractory to immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors: a multicenter IMWG study

Author

Kumar, S K, Dimopoulos, M A, Kastritis, E, Terpos, E, Nahi, H, Goldschmidt, H, Hillengass, J, Leleu, X, Beksac, M, Alsina, M, Oriol, A, Cavo, M, Ocio, E M, Mateos, M V, O'Donnell, E K, Vij, R, Lokhorst, H M, van de Donk, N W C J, Min, C, Mark, T, Turesson, I, Hansson, M, Ludwig, H, Jagannath, S, Delforge, M, Kyriakou, C, Hari, P, Mellqvist, U, Usmani, S Z, Dytfeld, D, Badros, A Z, Moreau, P, Kim, K, Otero, P R, Lee, J H, Shustik, C, Waller, D, Chng, W J, Ozaki, S, Lee, J-J, de la Rubia, J, Eom, H S, Rosinol, L, Lahuerta, J J, Sureda, A, Kim, J S, and Durie, B G M

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

30. Crystallization and preliminary X‐ray analysis of human endothelin

Author

Waller, D, Cudney, R, Wolff, M, Day, J, Greenwood, A, Larson, S, and McPherson, A

Subjects
Crystallization, Endothelins, Humans, Protein Conformation, X-Ray Diffraction, Analytical Chemistry, Physical Chemistry (incl. Structural), Materials Engineering, Inorganic & Nuclear Chemistry
Abstract

Endothelin, a potent regulator of vasoconstriction and hypertension, is a naturally produced peptide of 21 amino acids containing two disulfide bonds. We have crystallized endothelin from humans using the vapor-diffusion technique, characterized the crystals by X-ray diffraction analysis, and have collected the X-ray intensities to a resolution of 1.8 A. The crystals, which demonstrate physical properties similar to most protein crystals and have a comparable solvent content, are hexagonal prisms that frequently grow to lengths of 400 microns and widths of 150 microns. The space group of the crystals is P6(1)22 (or P6(5)22), with a = 27.4, c = 79.6 A. There is one molecule of endothelin in the asymmetric unit of the crystals.

Published
1992

32. Comparative Effect of Lung volume reduction surgery for Emphysema and Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with valve placement: the CELEB trial

Author

Buttery, S C, primary, Lewis, A, additional, Latimer, L, additional, Kemp, S V, additional, Shah, P L, additional, Waller, D, additional, Lau, K, additional, Jordan, S, additional, Greening, N J, additional, Rathinam, S, additional, Banya, W, additional, Moxham, J, additional, Kirk, A J B, additional, Bilancia, R, additional, Tenconi, S, additional, Housley, K, additional, Lawson, R, additional, Steiner, M C, additional, and Hopkinson, N S, additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

34. A search for astrophysical burst signals at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory

Author

Aharmim, B., Ahmed, S.N., Anthony, A.E., Barros, N., Beier, E.W., Bellerive, A., Beltran, B., Bergevin, M., Biller, S.D., Boudjemline, K., Boulay, M.G., Cai, B., Chan, Y.D., Chauhan, D., Chen, M., Cleveland, B.T., Cox, G.A., Dai, X., Deng, H., Detwiler, J.A., DiMarco, M., Diamond, M.D., Doe, P.J., Doucas, G., Drouin, P.-L., Duncan, F.A., Dunford, M., Earle, E.D., Elliott, S.R., Evans, H.C., Ewan, G.T., Farine, J., Fergani, H., Fleurot, F., Ford, R.J., Formaggio, J.A., Gagnon, N., Goon, J.TM., Graham, K., Guillian, E., Habib, S., Hahn, R.L., Hallin, A.L., Hallman, E.D., Harvey, P.J., Hazama, R., Heintzelman, W.J., Heise, J., Helmer, R.L., Hime, A., Howard, C., Huang, M., Jagam, P., Jamieson, B., Jelley, N.A., Jerkins, M., Keeter, K.J., Klein, J.R., Kormos, L.L., Kos, M., Kraus, C., Krauss, C.B., Krueger, A., Kutter, T., Kyba, C.C.M., Lange, R., Law, J., Lawson, I.T., Lesko, K.T., Leslie, J.R., Levine, I., Loach, J.C., MacLellan, R., Majerus, S., Mak, H.B., Maneira, J., Martin, R., McCauley, N., McDonald, A.B., McGee, S.R., Miller, M.L., Monreal, B., Monroe, J., Nickel, B.G., Noble, A.J., O’Keeffe, H.M., Oblath, N.S., Ollerhead, R.W., Orebi Gann, G.D., Oser, S.M., Ott, R.A., Peeters, S.J.M., Poon, A.W.P., Prior, G., Reitzner, S.D., Rielage, K., Robertson, B.C., Robertson, R.G.H., Schwendener, M.H., Secrest, J.A., Seibert, S.R., Simard, O., Simpson, J.J., Sinclair, D., Skensved, P., Sonley, T.J., Stonehill, L.C., Tešić, G., Tolich, N., Tsui, T., Van Berg, R., VanDevender, B.A., Virtue, C.J., Wall, B.L., Waller, D., Wan Chan Tseung, H., Wark, D.L., Watson, P.J.S., Wendland, J., West, N., Wilkerson, J.F., Wilson, J.R., Wouters, J.M., Wright, A., Yeh, M., Zhang, F., and Zuber, K.

Published
2014
Full Text
View/download PDF

35. Design Rules for Efficient Organic Solar Cells

Author

Zhu, Z., Mühlbacher, D., Morana, M., Koppe, M., Scharber, M. C., Waller, D., Dennler, G., Brabec, C. J., Rhodes, William T., editor, Adibi, Ali, editor, Asakura, Toshimitsu, editor, Hänsch, Theodor W., editor, Kamiya, Takeshi, editor, Krausz, Ferenc, editor, Monemar, Bo, editor, Venghaus, Herbert, editor, Weber, Horst, editor, Weinfurter, Harald, editor, Petrova-Koch, Vesselinka, editor, Hezel, Rudolf, editor, and Goetzberger, Adolf, editor

Published
2009
Full Text
View/download PDF

37. Impact of Missing Data for Body Mass Index in an Epidemiologic Study

Author

Razzaghi, Hilda, Tinker, Sarah C., Herring, Amy H., Howards, Penelope P., Waller, D. Kim, and Johnson, Candice Y.

Subjects
Birth defects -- Risk factors -- Research, Body mass index -- Health aspects -- Research, Pregnant women -- Health aspects -- Research, Health care industry
Abstract

Objective To assess the potential impact of missing data on body mass index (BMI) on the association between prepregnancy obesity and specific birth defects. Methods Data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS) were analyzed. We assessed the factors associated with missing BMI data among mothers of infants without birth defects. Four analytic methods were then used to assess the impact of missing BMI data on the association between maternal prepregnancy obesity and three birth defects; spina bifida, gastroschisis, and cleft lip with/without cleft palate. The analytic methods were: (1) complete case analysis; (2) assignment of missing values to either obese or normal BMI; (3) multiple imputation; and (4) probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Logistic regression was used to estimate crude and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI). Results Of NBDPS control mothers 4.6 % were missing BMI data, and most of the missing values were attributable to missing height (~90 %). Missing BMI data was associated with birth outside of the US (aOR 8.6; 95 % CI 5.5, 13.4), interview in Spanish (aOR 2.4; 95 % CI 1.8, 3.2), Hispanic ethnicity (aOR 2.0; 95 % CI 1.2, 3.4), and, Author(s): Hilda Razzaghi[sup.1] , Sarah C. Tinker[sup.1] , Amy H. Herring[sup.2] , Penelope P. Howards[sup.3] , D. Kim Waller[sup.4] , Candice Y. Johnson[sup.1] [sup.3] [sup.5] , the National Birth Defects [...]

Published
2016
Full Text
View/download PDF

38. Lung volume reduction surgeryversusendobronchial valves: a randomised controlled trial

Author

Buttery, SC, Banya, W, Bilancia, R, Boyd, E, Buckley, J, Greening, NJ, Housley, K, Jordan, S, Kemp, SV, Kirk, AJB, Latimer, L, Lau, K, Lawson, R, Lewis, A, Moxham, J, Rathinam, S, Steiner, MC, Tenconi, S, Waller, D, Shah, PL, Hopkinson, NS, CELEB investigators, and CELEB investigators

Subjects
surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, emphysema, lung volume reduction, COPD, endobronchial valve
Abstract

BackgroundLung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) and bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) with endobronchial valves can improve outcomes in appropriately selected patients with emphysema. However, no direct comparison data exist to inform clinical decision making in people who appear suitable for both procedures. Our aim was to investigate whether LVRS produces superior health outcomes when compared with BLVR at 12 months.MethodsThis multicentre, single-blind, parallel-group trial randomised patients from five UK hospitals, who were suitable for a targeted lung volume reduction procedure, to either LVRS or BLVR and compared outcomes at 1 year using the i-BODE score. This composite disease severity measure includes body mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnoea and exercise capacity (incremental shuttle walk test). The researchers responsible for collecting outcomes were masked to treatment allocation. All outcomes were assessed in the intention-to-treat population.Results88 participants (48% female, mean±sdage 64.6±7.7 years, forced expiratory volume in 1 s percent predicted 31.0±7.9%) were recruited at five specialist centres across the UK and randomised to either LVRS (n=41) or BLVR (n=47). At 12 months follow-up, the complete i-BODE was available in 49 participants (21 LVRS/28 BLVR). Neither improvement in the i-BODE score (LVRS −1.10±1.44versusBLVR −0.82±1.61; p=0.54) nor in its individual components differed between groups. Both treatments produced similar improvements in gas trapping (residual volume percent predicted: LVRS −36.1% (95% CI −54.6– −10%)versusBLVR −30.1% (95% CI −53.7– −9%); p=0.81). There was one death in each treatment arm.ConclusionOur findings do not support the hypothesis that LVRS is a substantially superior treatment to BLVR in individuals who are suitable for both treatments.

Published
2023

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results