Search

Abstract Background Of 136 million babies born annually, around 10 million require assistance to breathe. Each year 814,000 neonatal deaths result from intrapartum-related events in term babies (previously “birth asphyxia”) and 1.03 million from complications of prematurity. No systematic assessment of mortality reduction from tactile stimulation or resuscitation has been published. Objective To estimate the mortality effect of immediate newborn assessment and stimulation, and basic resuscitation on neonatal deaths due to term intrapartum-related events or preterm birth, for facility and home births. Methods We conducted systematic reviews for studies reporting relevant mortality or morbidity outcomes. Evidence was assessed using GRADE criteria adapted to provide a systematic approach to mortality effect estimates for the Lives Saved Tool (LiST). Meta-analysis was performed if appropriate. For interventions with low quality evidence but strong recommendation for implementation, a Delphi panel was convened to estimate effect size. Results We identified 24 studies of neonatal resuscitation reporting mortality outcomes (20 observational, 2 quasi-experimental, 2 cluster randomized controlled trials), but none of immediate newborn assessment and stimulation alone. A meta-analysis of three facility-based studies examined the effect of resuscitation training on intrapartum-related neonatal deaths (RR= 0.70, 95%CI 0.59-0.84); this estimate was used for the effect of facility-based basic neonatal resuscitation (additional to stimulation). The evidence for preterm mortality effect was low quality and thus expert opinion was sought. In community-based studies, resuscitation training was part of packages with multiple concurrent interventions, and/or studies did not distinguish term intrapartum-related from preterm deaths, hence no meta-analysis was conducted. Our Delphi panel of 18 experts estimated that immediate newborn assessment and stimulation would reduce both intrapartum-related and preterm deaths by 10%, facility-based resuscitation would prevent a further 10% of preterm deaths, and community-based resuscitation would prevent further 20% of intrapartum-related and 5% of preterm deaths. Conclusion Neonatal resuscitation training in facilities reduces term intrapartum-related deaths by 30%. Yet, coverage of this intervention remains low in countries where most neonatal deaths occur and is a missed opportunity to save lives. Expert opinion supports smaller effects of neonatal resuscitation on preterm mortality in facilities and of basic resuscitation and newborn assessment and stimulation at community level. Further evaluation is required for impact, cost and implementation strategies in various contexts. Funding This work was supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation through a grant to the US Fund for UNICEF, and to the Saving Newborn Lives program of Save the Children, through Save the Children US.

It appears that opiate pain killers are provided to most infants as they die following the removal or withholding of life support. Opiate usage was determined among 121 infant deaths in an advanced intensive care nursery (ICN) where life support had been removed or withheld. Eighty-four percent of these infants had been given opiate pain killers before their death. Most infants with major birth defects and all infants that had treatment limited because of suffering received opiate pain killers. Birth weight was not a factor in whether the infant received opiates before death., Objective. To determine the frequency of opiate analgesia administration to infants when life support is discontinued and to determine whether infant characteristics, such as birth weight and diagnosis, or the physician's reasons for discontinuing life support influence either the decision to provide opioid agents or the dosages administered. Methods. We reviewed all 165 deaths in a 3-year period at a university-based level III intensive care nursery. Of the 121 deaths attributable to withdrawal or withholding of mechanical ventilation and/or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, we ascertained whether opioid analgesics (morphine sulfate [MS] or fentanyl) were administered either concurrent with or after life-support withdrawal and at what doses. We examined whether these end-of-life practices varied according to birth weight, diagnoses, and the reasons documented by the neonatologist for discontinuing life support. Results. Opioid analgesia was provided to 84% of infants as their life support was either withheld or withdrawn. Infants with necrotizing enterocolitis and major anomalies or chromosomal disorders were more likely to be given opiates than infants with other diagnoses. Birth weight was not different for infants who received opiates compared with those who were not given opiates. Opioid analgesia was provided to all 18 infants for whom physicians documented the patients' suffering as a reason to discontinue life support. Sixty-four percent of infants who received opiates were given doses in the usual pharmacologic range of 0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg MS. Of the 36 infants given more than 0.2 mg/kg MS, all but 2 were receiving ongoing treatment with opioid agents. Conclusions. In most cases of withholding or withdrawal of life support in critically ill infants, neonatologists provided opioid analgesia to these infants at the end of life, despite the potential respiratory depression of opioid agents in infants whose respiratory support is discontinued. Pediatrics 1997;99:76-79; death, infant, analgesia, opiate, life support., ABBREVIATIONS ICN, intensive care nursery; ELBW, extremely low birth weight; NEC, necrotizing enterocolitis; MS, morphine sulfate. Analgesic use for sick neonates has been a controversial topic for many years, as [...]

Estimations of the long-term value of life support measures may be the driving force in infant care specialists' decisions to limit treatment of infants in advanced intensive care nurseries (ICNs). The medical records of 165 infants who died in an advanced ICN were reviewed to determine whether and why life support measures were discontinued or never initiated. Infant care specialists never started or discontinued life support measures with 74% of these infants. Most doctors indicated that further treatment was useless or would result in poor quality of life. Forty-four infants died while receiving full life support., Objective. To determine the frequency of selective nontreatment of extremely premature, critically ill, or malformed infants among all infant deaths in a level III intensive care nursery (ICN) and to determine the reasons documented by neonatologists for their decisions to withdraw or withhold life support. Methods. This was a descriptive study based on review of the medical records of all 165 infants who died at a university-based level III ICN during 3 years. We determined whether each death had occurred despite the use of all available technologies to keep the infant alive or whether these were withheld or withdrawn, thereby leading to the infant's death. We also determined whether neonatologists documented either "futility" or "quality of life" as a reason to limit medical interventions. Results. One hundred sixty-five infants died among the 1609 infants admitted during the study period. One hundred eight infant deaths followed the withdrawal of life support, 13 deaths followed the withholding of treatment, and 44 deaths occurred while infants continued to receive maximal life-sustaining treatment. For 90 (74%) of the 121 deaths attributable to withholding of withdrawal of treatment, physicians cited that death was imminent and treatment was futile. Quality-of-life concerns were cited by the neonatologists as reasons to limit treatment in 62 (51%). Quality of life was the only reason cited for limiting treatment for 28 (23%) of the 121 deaths attributable to withholding or withdrawal of treatment. Conclusions. The majority of deaths in the ICN occurred as a result of selective nontreatment by neonatologists, with few infants receiving maximal support until the actual time of death. Neonatologists often documented that quality-of-life concerns were considered in decisions to limit treatment; however, the majority of these decisions were based on their belief that treatment was futile. Prospective studies are needed to elucidate the determinants of neonatologists' practice decisions of selective nontreatment for marginally viable or damaged infants. Pediatrics 1997;99:64-70; death, life support, neonatologists, withdrawal, withholding., ABBREVIATIONS. ICN, intensive care nursery; UCSF, University of California, San Francisco; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; ELBW, extremely low birth weight; ICH, intracranial hemorrhage; NEC, necrotizing enterocolitis; HIE, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy; DNR, [...]

Background: Of 136 million babies born annually, around 10 million require assistance to breathe. Each year 814,000 neonatal deaths result from intrapartum-related events in term babies (previously "birth asphyxia") and 1.03 million from complications of prematurity. No systematic assessment of mortality reduction from tactile stimulation or resuscitation has been published. Objective: To estimate the mortality effect of immediate newborn assessment and stimulation, and basic resuscitation on neonatal deaths due to term intrapartum-related events or preterm birth, for facility and home births. Methods: We conducted systematic reviews for studies reporting relevant mortality or morbidity outcomes. Evidence was assessed using GRADE criteria adapted to provide a systematic approach to mortality effect estimates for the Lives Saved Tool (LiST). Meta-analysis was performed if appropriate. For interventions with low quality evidence but strong recommendation for implementation, a Delphi panel was convened to estimate effect size. Results: We identified 24 studies of neonatal resuscitation reporting mortality outcomes (20 observational, 2 quasiexperimental, 2 cluster randomized controlled trials), but none of immediate newborn assessment and stimulation alone. A meta-analysis of three facility-based studies examined the effect of resuscitation training on intrapartumrelated neonatal deaths (RR= 0.70, 95%CI 0.59-0.84); this estimate was used for the effect of facility-based basic neonatal resuscitation (additional to stimulation). The evidence for preterm mortality effect was low quality and thus expert opinion was sought. In community-based studies, resuscitation training was part of packages with multiple concurrent interventions, and/or studies did not distinguish term intrapartum-related from preterm deaths, hence no meta-analysis was conducted. Our Delphi panel of 18 experts estimated that immediate newborn assessment and stimulation would reduce both intrapartum-related and preterm deaths by 10%, facility-based resuscitation would prevent a further 10% of preterm deaths, and community-based resuscitation would prevent further 20% of intrapartum-related and 5% of preterm deaths. Conclusion: Neonatal resuscitation training in facilities reduces term intrapartum-related deaths by 30%. Yet, coverage of this intervention remains low in countries where most neonatal deaths occur and is a missed opportunity to save lives. Expert opinion supports smaller effects of neonatal resuscitation on preterm mortality in facilities and of basic resuscitation and newborn assessment and stimulation at community level. Further evaluation is required for impact, cost and implementation strategies in various contexts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Of the 4 million neonatal deaths and 500,000 maternal deaths that occur annually worldwide, almost 99% are in developing countries and one-third are associated with infections. Implementation of proven interventions and targeted research on a select number of promising high-impact preventative and curative interventions are essential to achieve Millennium Development Goals for reduction of child and maternal mortality. Feasible, simple, low-cost interventions have the potential to significantly reduce the mortality and severe morbidity associated with infection in these settings. Studies of chlorhexidine in developing countries have focused on three primary uses: 1) intrapartum vaginal and neonatal wiping, 2) neonatal wiping alone, and 3) umbilical cord cleansing. A study of vaginal wiping and neonatal skin cleansing with chlorhexidine, conducted in Malawi in the 1990s suggested that chlorhexidine has potential to reduce neonatal infectious morbidity and mortality. A recent trial of cord cleansing conducted in Nepal also demonstrated benefit. Although studies have shown promise, widespread acceptance and implementation of chlorhexidine use has not yet occurred. This paper is derived in part from data presented at a conference on the use of chlorhexidine in developing countries and reviews the available evidence related to chlorhexidine use to reduce mortality and severe morbidity due to infections in mothers and neonates in low-resource settings. It also summarizes issues related to programmatic implementation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: We performed a hospital-based case control study of African-American mothers to explore the relationship between maternal support by a significant other in the delivery room and very low birthweight (VLBW)., Methods: We administered a structured questionnaire to mothers of VLBW (less than 1,500 g; N=104) and normal birthweight (greater or equal to 2,500 g; N=208) infants., Results: The odds ratio for VLBW comparing women without social support in the delivery room to those with a companion was 3.5 (2.1-5.8). Several traditional risk factors were not associated with VLBW, but older maternal age and perceived racial discrimination were., Conclusions: Maternal support in the delivery room or factors closely associated with it significantly decreases the odds of delivering a VLBW infant for African-American women.