Search

Objectives In this study, we evaluated the inflammatory response in patients with severe acute respiratory infection due to the Middle East respiratory syndrome and non-Middle East respiratory syndrome and assessed the presence of distinct inflammatory subphenotypes using latent class analysis. Design Prospective cohort study. Setting A tertiary care ICU in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Patients Consecutive critically ill patients with laboratory-confirmed Middle East respiratory syndrome severe acute respiratory infection and non-Middle East respiratory syndrome severe acute respiratory infection. Intervention None. Measurements and main results We measured cytokines on days 1, 3, 7, and 14 of ICU stay. We included 116 patients (40 with Middle East respiratory syndrome severe acute respiratory infection and 76 with non-Middle East respiratory syndrome severe acute respiratory infection). On ICU day 1, both patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome severe acute respiratory infection and non-Middle East respiratory syndrome severe acute respiratory infection had higher levels of interleukin-3, interleukin-4, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, interleukin-17A, eotaxin, and epidermal growth factor compared with healthy controls. There were no differences in cytokines over time between patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome severe acute respiratory infection and non-Middle East respiratory syndrome severe acute respiratory infection. Using day 1 cytokine levels, latent class analysis categorized patients into two subphenotypes: subphenotype 1 (n = 74 [64%]) and subphenotype 2 (n = 42 [36%]); the latter had significantly higher levels of interleukin-1β, interleukin-1ra, interleukin-2, interleukin-6, interleukin-7, interleukin-8, interleukin-10, interleukin-12p70, interleukin-15, interleukin-17A, inducible protein-10, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, macrophage inflammatory protein-1α, macrophage inflammatory protein-1β, tumor necrosis factor-α, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, interferon-α, and interferon-γ. Although baseline characteristics were not different between the two subphenotypes, patients in the subphenotype 2 had higher ICU mortality compared with the subphenotype 1 (18/42 [43%] vs 17/74 [23%]; p = 0.03). Conclusions One third of critically ill patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome severe acute respiratory infection and non-Middle East respiratory syndrome severe acute respiratory infection demonstrated a subphenotype characterized by increased proinflammatory cytokines, consistent with cytokine storm. Further research is needed to examine whether immunomodulators have differential effects based on inflammatory subphenotypes.

The effect of short-term caloric restriction on gene expression in critically ill patients has not been studied. In this sub-study of the PermiT trial (Permissive Underfeeding or Standard Enteral Feeding in Critically Ill Adults Trial- ISRCTN68144998), we examined gene expression patterns in peripheral white blood cells (buffy coat) associated with moderate caloric restriction (permissive underfeeding) in critically ill patients compared to standard feeding. Blood samples collected on study day 1 and 14 were subjected to total RNA extraction and gene expression using microarray analysis. We enrolled 50 patients, 25 in each group. Among 1751 tested genes, 332 genes in 12 pathways were found to be significantly upregulated or downregulated between study day 1 and 14 (global p value for the pathway ≤ 0.05). Using the heatmap, the differential expression of genes from day 1 to 14 in the permissive underfeeding group was compared to the standard feeding group. We further compared gene expression signal intensity in permissive underfeeding compared standard feeding by constructing univariate and multivariate linear regression models on individual patient data. We found differential expression of several genes with permissive underfeeding, most notably those related to metabolism, autophagy and other cellular functions, indicating that moderate differences in caloric intake trigger different cellular pathways.

BACKGROUND: Public cord blood banks (CBBs) store cord blood unit (CBU) donations for anyone in need. However, strict regulations need to be followed to build up high-quality bank products that can be used worldwide. We established a public CBB at a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia. Here, we investigated the reasons behind rejecting or not collecting CBUs over 2 years (2011-2012) and which steps were implemented to improve the number and quality of storable units. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 2891 mothers were evaluated. Reasons for rejecting donors, not collecting, and rejecting units before or after collection were analyzed and compared for the years 2011 and 2012. RESULTS: A total of 1157 (40%) CBUs were not collected, mainly due to staff availability, and 564 (20%) CBUs were rejected. The main reason for rejecting donations was the mother’s or neonate’s health. Rejecting CBUs after collection was due to low volume. A total of 1170 (40%) CBUs were successfully collected for potential banking and sent for processing; however, 58% were rejected in the laboratory due to low total nucleated cell counts. Several changes were implemented during the 2 years including physician education and awareness, in utero collection, cesarean collection, and staff recruitment. These changes positively affected the numbers of our collected units. Out of the initially eligible mothers in 2011, only 17% were banked; this was increased to 33% in 2012. CONCLUSIONS: We identified the problems with collecting CBUs for banking and will keep improving our selection process of recruiting more CBUs of high quality.

Public cord blood banks (CBBs) store cord blood unit (CBU) donations for anyone in need. However, strict regulations need to be followed to build up high-quality bank products that can be used worldwide. We established a public CBB at a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia. Here, we investigated the reasons behind rejecting or not collecting CBUs over 2 years (2011-2012) and which steps were implemented to improve the number and quality of storable units.A total of 2891 mothers were evaluated. Reasons for rejecting donors, not collecting, and rejecting units before or after collection were analyzed and compared for the years 2011 and 2012.A total of 1157 (40%) CBUs were not collected, mainly due to staff availability, and 564 (20%) CBUs were rejected. The main reason for rejecting donations was the mother's or neonate's health. Rejecting CBUs after collection was due to low volume. A total of 1170 (40%) CBUs were successfully collected for potential banking and sent for processing; however, 58% were rejected in the laboratory due to low total nucleated cell counts. Several changes were implemented during the 2 years including physician education and awareness, in utero collection, cesarean collection, and staff recruitment. These changes positively affected the numbers of our collected units. Out of the initially eligible mothers in 2011, only 17% were banked; this was increased to 33% in 2012.We identified the problems with collecting CBUs for banking and will keep improving our selection process of recruiting more CBUs of high quality.