Search

PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is implicated in breast cancer progression and recurrence. The identification of PIK3CA and AKT1 mutations and loss of PTEN serve as selection criterion for targeted therapies involving selective inhibitors. However, they do not consistently align with pathway activation, and high-cost determinations limit their routine application. PI3K-downstream epigenetic regulatory mechanisms broaden the alterations that amplify pathway activity and, consequently, sensitivity to selective inhibitors. In this retrospective observational study, conducted within a cohort of early-stage breast cancer patients, we determined phosphorylated ribosomal protein S6 (pS6) at Ser240/244 by immunohistochemistry as an indicator of PI3K pathway activation. Log-Rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to analyze the clinical relevance of pS6, alone and together with clinicopathological variables, regarding recurrence-free survival. ROC curves and the area under the curves were used to evaluate the calibration and discrimination properties of uni- and multivariate models. Our results show that a high percentage of pS6 positive tumor cells was associated with an unfavorable prognosis in a cohort of 129 hormone receptor positive/HER2 negative breast cancer patients (Hazard Ratio = 5.92; Log-Rank p = 9.5e-08; median follow-up = 53 months). When assessed in combination with lymph node status, the predictive capacity was higher compared to both univariate models individually. In conclusion, pS6 could represent a novel independent marker for predicting recurrence risk in luminal breast cancer., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The phase 3 CheckMate-743 trial demonstrated a prolonged overall survival (OS) benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab over chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with unresectable pleural mesothelioma (PM). However, given that Latin American (LATAM) patients were notably underrepresented in this trial, we retrospectively assessed the effectiveness and safety of this regimen in this population., Methods: This retrospective study included patients from 15 centers in LATAM with unresectable or metastatic PM treated with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in a real-world data (RWD) scenario. Demographic, clinicopathological characteristics, and safety data were collected from medical charts. Progression-free survival (PFS), and OS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: From June 2017, and January 2024 96 patients were included: epithelioid 78% (n = 75), 81% were ECOG 0-1 (n = 78). With a median follow-up of 24.1 months, median PFS and OS were 8 months (95% CI, 6.6-9.4), and 22 months (95% CI, 18.9-25), respectively. No statistical difference in OS was observed between epithelioid versus nonepithelioid histology (median 23 months vs. 19 months, respectively; P = .29). Treatment efficacy was also consistent among different clinical subgroups. Any and grade 3-4 adverse events were found in 43.1% (n = 28), and 18.5% (n = 12) of patients, respectively. Remarkably, no OS impact was observed in patients who had dose delay or treatment discontinuation due to immune-related adverse events, and those who experienced any adverse event., Conclusions: This multicenter RWD study demonstrated the clinically meaningful benefit of first-line ipilimumab and nivolumab in LATAM patients with unresectable or metastatic PM, and data is consistent with previous trial findings., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The optimal treatment sequence for hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) after progression on first-line cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDKi) and endocrine therapy is unclear. Clinical and biological factors influencing treatment choices and outcomes in the second-line setting need to be elucidated., Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of a real-world cohort including patients with HR+/HER2- ABC who received CDKi and endocrine therapy in the first-line setting and progressed, requiring second-line treatment. Clinical and biological factors were analyzed to evaluate their association with daily treatment decisions and the prognostic role of progression-free survival (PFS) in the second-line setting., Results: Two hundred thirty-five patients were included. Second-line treatments were hormone therapy (HT) based in 60% and chemotherapy based in 40% of patients. The second-line median PFS was 6.6 months, with no difference between treatment types. In multivariable analysis, postmenopausal status, lower Ki-67 expression, and non-de novo stage IV disease were associated with improved second-line (2L) PFS. Menopausal status significantly interacted with treatment type, with reduced PFS in premenopausal patients receiving HT-based treatments (4.7 v 8.7 months, P = .00045)., Conclusion: In our study, treatment decisions reflected the current algorithm incorporated in our clinical guidelines, and prior treatment response was the most relevant factor to determine 2L treatment decision. Menopausal status interacted with the subsequent therapy efficacy in this setting. Hence, we consider that menopausal status should be routinely evaluated in the subgroup analysis of clinical trials.

Genomic analysis through various platforms is an essential tool for determining prognosis and treatment in a significant subgroup of early-stage breast cancer patients with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative status. Additionally, combined clinical and pathological characteristics can accurately predict the recurrence score (RS), as demonstrated by the University of Tennessee risk nomogram. In this study, we aimed to identify classical clinical-pathological factors associated with high RS in a local population, including modern parameters such as current abemaciclib treatment recommendations, HER2-low status, different Ki-67 cutoff values, and samples obtained from secondary primary tumours. This is a retrospective single-institution study that analysed a total of 215 tumour samples. Among lymph node-negative patients ( n = 179), age, Ki67 values, and progesterone receptor status predicted RS after multivariate analysis. HER2-low status was not associated with RS differences ( p = 0.41). Among lymph node-positive patients ( n = 36), MonarchE inclusion criteria (15) were not associated with a higher RS ( p = 0.61), and HER2-low did not reach statistical significance. However, tumours classified as secondary primaries numerically exhibited a higher RS. Based on these findings from our real-world sample, the mere application of clinical and pathological parameters is insufficient to predict RS outcomes. Modern parameters such as HER2-low status or adjuvant abemaciclib recommendations were not associated with RS differences. Regarding the observation of secondary tumours, more evidence is needed to understand whether prior hormone therapy exposure impacts the biological risk of secondary primary tumours., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (© the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience.)

This narrative review aims to clarify the role of tertiary lymphoid structures in breast cancer. We examine their development, composition, and prognostic value, and current ways of recognizing them. A comprehensive literature review was performed using the PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and EMBASE databases. A significant area of interest in breast cancer research involves targeting immune checkpoint molecules, particularly in the triple-negative subtype, where treatment options remain limited. However, existing biomarkers have limitations in accurately predicting treatment response. In this context, tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) emerge as a prognostic biomarker and also as a promising predictive marker for response. TLSs are ectopic lymphoid formations or neo-organogenesis that can develop after prolonged exposure to inflammatory signals mediated by chemokines and cytokines. Their presence is inversely correlated with estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR) expression, but positively associated with a higher pathologic complete response rate and improved overall survival. In certain scenarios, TLS-positive tumors were associated with improved outcomes regardless of the presence of PDL-1 (programmed cell death ligand 1) expression or TILs (tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes).

Introduction: Medical research and development (R&D) is an undoubtedly relevant activity to drive innovation, improve healthcare policies and bring patients treatment opportunities for common and rare diseases. Equity and inclusion are matters of concern in research. High-income countries' research teams are more likely to have more impactful publications, grant funding, and clinical trials than middle or low-income countries. Low budget allocations to R&D and existing gaps in regulatory frameworks are some obstacles to growth. This unvirtuous cycle results in scarce advances in common endemic diseases and the underrepresentation of specific populations in innovative therapeutics research., Materials and Methods: We conducted a policy review and qualitative research to determine the principal characteristics of basic and clinical medical research in Paraguay, as well as barriers and facilitators to improve innovative R&D strategies in this country. To this aim, we examined published articles from 2005 to 2020, the organizational structure of national research agencies, the current regulation framework, and the composition and experience of local research groups and ethical review boards (ERBs). In addition, we performed semi-structured interviews to evaluate perceptions and expectations from different stakeholders, including investigators, ERBs members, sponsor associates, and Regulatory Agency executive staff., Results: In 2018, Paraguay ranked 10th out of 12 South American countries in total number of publications and cumulative h-index score. Total Gross Domestic Product (GDP) allocation for R&D was 0.15%, ranking eighth out of 12 in the region. In 2021, the number of trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov was 52, with only 16 ongoing recruiting studies at that time.Some of the main barriers identified included low incentives for academic careers and lack of experience in pharmaceutical research. An emergent necessity to develop a straight- forward normative framework was detected. Main facilitators included the development of two research initiative programs (PRONII and PROCIENCIA) from CONACYT (National Council of Science and Technology) which were associated with higher budget allocation and total number of publications in the 2011 to 2017 period. A total of six stakeholders participated in the semi-structured surveys. Interviewees highlighted the necessity of a centralized policy to promote R&D, which incorporates investigators and ERBs training, the development of standardized procedures, and the dissemination of research activities. Sponsor associates underlined that real-world evidence may represent a distinctive opportunity to enhance local research., Conclusion: Coordinated efforts are needed to break the unvirtuous cycle. There is an increasing interest in enhancing health research in Paraguay, materialized in the creation of specific programs that encourage the collaborative work of healthcare providers, basic scientists, and private investors. Nonetheless, a comprehensive approach is needed also to strengthen regulatory agencies and attract external sponsorship. While modern and currently popular topics, including artificial intelligence, real-world data, and translational research may represent key opportunities to seek investment, special policies should be adopted to prioritize research on the determinants of health in the Paraguayan population., Competing Interests: MDC was employed by the company SITIO BioMedical Solutions S.A. EK was employed by the company QUID LATAM Consulting. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Donna, León, Colas, Gunsett, Maniero, Osuna, Klimovsky, Coradini, Enrico, Chacón and Waisberg.)

Background: Short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) of 25 Gy in five daily fractions is a recommended strategy in the neoadjuvant setting for resectable locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), as well as in cases of metastatic disease for local control. There is scarce information regarding the use of SCRT for patients who have received nonoperative management., Objectives: To describe the characteristics of patients who received treatment with SCRT for LARC and metastatic rectal cancer, toxicity, and the approach after radiation treatment., Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent SCRT for rectal cancer at the Alexander Fleming Institute from March 2014 to June 2022., Results: In total, 44 patients were treated with SCRT. The majority were male (29, 66%), with a median age of 59 years (interquartile range 46-73). Most patients had stage IV disease (26, 59.1%), followed by LARC (18, 40.9%). Most lesions were located in the middle rectum (30, 68%). The majority of LARC patients underwent SCRT followed by consolidation chemotherapy (ChT) (16/18, 89%), while most patients with metastatic disease underwent SCRT followed by consolidation ChT (14/26, 53.8%). A clinical complete response (cCR) was documented in 8/44, 18.2% of patients. Most patients with LARC and cCR were managed by a watch and wait approach (5/18, 27.7%). Local recurrence was observed in LARC cases (2/18, 11.1%). Patients who underwent SCRT following consolidation ChT were more likely to have adverse events (AEs) than those undergoing induction ChT following SCRT (11/30, 36.7% versus 3/12, 25%, p = 0.02)., Conclusion: In a subgroup of patients diagnosed with LARC and treated with SCRT followed by ChT, surgical treatment could be omitted after they achieved a cCR. Local recurrence was similar to that reported in a previous study. SCRT is a reasonable option for local disease control in stage IV disease, yielding low toxicity rates. Therefore, decisions must be made by a multidisciplinary team. Prospective studies are necessary to reach further conclusions., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest for this manuscript., (© the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience.)

Around 20% of breast cancers are associated with amplification or overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). In this setting, anti-HER2-targeted agents are the cornerstone of cancer therapeutic strategies. This includes monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and, recently, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). With the advent of these new alternatives, the decision-making process has become more complex, especially with regard to the treatment sequence possibilities. In spite of the fact that overall survival has significantly improved accordingly, resistance to treatment remains a challenge in HER2-positive breast cancer. The introduction of new agents has created awareness regarding new potential specific adverse events, and consequently, their increasing application pose major challenges in daily patient care. This review describes the therapeutic landscape for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) and evaluates its benefits and risks in the clinical setting., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2023 Mandó et al.)

Background: Non-cytotoxic therapy has changed the treatment paradigm for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. With unique mechanisms of action, these agents have decidedly improved survival and have demonstrated an improved toxicity profile. However, the real-life experience of the patient, which is commonly assessed by health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measurement, is not clearly established with this new generation of lung cancer treatments. The heterogeneity created by specific patient subgroups and different therapeutics calls for a tailored-approach to analyzing patient-reported outcomes. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the methodological quality of HRQoL analysis in Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) involving biologic agents to treat NSCLC., Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify NSCLC RCTs published between January 1st, 2000 and January 1st, 2020 reporting HRQoL measures. Only RCTs that both enrolled previously untreated patients with advanced NSCLC and had HRQoL analysis were included., Results: 4203 abstracts were screened, of which only 85 RCTs met inclusion and exclusion criteria for analysis. The most applied HRQoL assessment tools were the EORTC-QLQ-C30 (47, 55.3 %), and EORTC-QLQ-LC13 (35, 41.2 %). The median number of verified CONSORT-PRO Extension criteria in the included trials was 3, and only in 10 (11.8 %) trials were all criteria well-documented. Notably, only 21 (24.7 %) RCTs performed subgroup analyses to specifically evaluate HRQoL in different patient populations., Conclusion: QoL reporting in clinical trials is inconsistent and the quality of QoL measures adopted in a majority of trials is suboptimal. Considering the fact that NSCLC is a biologically diverse disease and that the treatments differ based on patient and tumor-specifics, efforts should be pursued to tailor QoL measures for different subsets of this patient population in addition to mandating QoL reporting in clinical trials. We believe that this is necessary to understand the real-life experience of lung cancer patients in the era of personalized medicine., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Given the increasing complexity of cancer care, multidisciplinary tumor boards have become essential in daily clinical oncology practice. The Project Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) initiative developed an innovative telementoring model using a "hub and spoke" design consisting of a team of experts (hub) that offers a full service to multiple participants (the spokes) during regularly scheduled sessions discussing patients' clinical cases. The Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute in Buenos Aires was the first hub in Latin America to implement Project ECHO for gastrointestinal tumors. In our 3-year experience, 80 patients from 37 centers were evaluated within Project ECHO and a range of three to five cases were discussed in each meeting. From our perspective, the impact of this novel approach was a remarkable strategy to reduce care disparities by equalizing access to high-quality medical knowledge in a multidisciplinary environment for medical discussions. Additionally, it was shown to have a cost-effective impact directly on the patients and the local health system, since relevant costs were saved after unnecessary treatments, studies and travel expenses were avoided., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article., (©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: In recent years, unprecedented benefits have been observed with the development of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4 and 6 inhibitors for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. However, there is scarce evidence of their value in specific populations, such as patients carrying germline pathogenic variants in DNA repair-related genes., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively studied the efficacy of CDK 4/6 inhibitors plus endocrine therapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. Three cohorts were compared, including patients harboring germline pathogenic variants in DNA repair-related genes (g BRCA 1/2- ATM - CHEK2 mutated), those tested without these mutations (wild type [WT]), and the nontested subgroup. Relevant prognostic factors including age, metastatic site (visceral v nonvisceral), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, and prior treatment with CDK 4/6 inhibitors were stratified by univariate and multivariate Cox regression models., Results: Among the total population (n = 217), 15 (6.9%) patients carried g BRCA 1/2 (n = 10)- ATM (n = 4)- CHEK2 (n = 1) pathogenic variants, 45 (20.7%) were WT, and 157 (72.4%) were nontested. Gene pathogenic variant carriers were younger ( P < .001). Most patients (164, 75.6%) had not received prior endocrine therapy in the advanced setting. Median progression-free survival was shorter in patients with evaluated germline pathogenic variants (10.2 months [95% CI, 5.7 to 14.7]), compared with WT and nontested patients (15.6 months [95% CI, 7.8 to 23.4], and (17.6 months [95% CI, 12.9 to 22.2]; P = .002). Consistently, a worse median overall survival was observed in the subgroup with germline pathogenic variants than in the WT group ( P = .006). Multivariable analysis showed that mutation status was an independent prognostic factor of progression-free survival ( P = .020) and overall survival ( P = .012)., Conclusion: In this retrospective real-world study, g BRCA1 / 2 - ATM-CHEK2 pathogenic variants were independently associated with poor outcomes in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors., Competing Interests: Luisina BrunoHonoraria: Roche, Janssen Oncology, Pfizer, MSD OncologyConsulting or Advisory Role: MSD Oncology, AstraZeneca/MerckSpeakers' Bureau: Roche, Janssen OncologyResearch Funding: RocheTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bayer, Novartis, Pfizer Federico WaisbergTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche Carolina PonceEmployment: MSD Verónica FabianoEmployment: Instituto Alexander FlemingHonoraria: Novartis (Inst), Roche (Inst), Pfizer, OmicsHealth, LLC (Inst), AstraZeneca/Merck (Inst), Amgen (Inst), Pfizer (Inst)Other Relationship: Varifarma Jorge NadalConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, LillySpeakers' Bureau: Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, Varifarma, Gador, AmgenExpert Testimony: AmgenTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Pfizer, GADOR, Novartis Adrián NervoConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche/Genentech, Pfizer, Novartis, LillySpeakers' Bureau: Lilly Victoria CostanzoHonoraria: Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, Amgen, Sanofi, VarifarmaConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Pfizer, Lilly, Roche, AstraZeneca/Merck, MSD OncologySpeakers' Bureau: Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, RocheTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Novartis, PfizerNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Background: The targeted therapy cetuximab [directed at the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)] in combination with 5-fluorouracil and platinum-based chemotherapy (the EXTREME regimen) has shown substantial efficacy for patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN). Thus, this scheme has been established as the preferred first-line option for these patients. However, more recently, a new strategy combining platinum, taxanes, and cetuximab (the TPEx regimen) has demonstrated similar efficacy with a more favorable toxicity profile in clinical trials., Aim: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TPEx scheme as first-line therapy in advanced SCCHN in a multicenter cohort study., Methods: This retrospective multicenter cohort study included patients with histologically confirmed recurrent or metastatic SCCHN treated with first-line TPEx at five medical centers in Argentina between January 1, 2017 and April 31, 2020. Chemotherapy consisted of four cycles of docetaxel, cisplatin, and cetuximab followed by cetuximab maintenance therapy. Clinical outcomes and toxicity profiles were collected from medical charts. Treatment response was assessed by the investigator in accordance with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1). Adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0)., Results: Twenty-four patients were included. The median age at diagnosis was 58 years (range: 36-77 years). The majority of patients (83.3%) received at least four chemotherapy cycles in the initial phase. In the included group, the overall response rate was 62.5%, and 3 patients achieved a complete response (12.5%). The median time to response was 2.4 mo [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3-3.5]. With a median follow-up of 12.7 mo (95%CI: 8.8-16.6), the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.9 mo (95%CI: 6.5-7.3), and the overall survival rate at 12 mo was 82.4%. Patients with documented tumor response showed a better PFS than those with disease stabilization or progression [8.5 mo (95%CI: 5.5-11.5) and 4.5 mo (95%CI: 2.5-6.6), respectively; P = 0.042]. Regarding the safety analysis, two-thirds of patients reported at least one treatment-related adverse event, and 25% presented grade 3 toxicities. Of note, no patient experienced grade 4 adverse events., Conclusion: TPEx was an adequately tolerated regimen in our population, with low incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events. The median PFS were consistent with those in recent reports of clinical trials evaluating this treatment combination. This regimen may be considered an attractive therapeutic strategy due to its simplified administration, decreased total number of chemotherapy cycles, and treatment tolerability., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors have no conflicts of interest related to the manuscript., (©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

We systematically reviewed the quality of AEs reports in published oncology trials analyzing also the bias in the attribution process. We searched MEDLINE, PubMed (2000-2019) selecting randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and phase 3 cancer trials using exclusively targeted therapy or immunotherapy-related drugs. The proportion of publications with complete AE reports (including both all-cause and drug-related AE data) and the AEs attribution ratio (patients with drug-related over all-cause AE) were investigated. Among 60 trials (38,174 patients) included, 40 (66.6 %) presented an incomplete report of AEs attribution. Journals with the lowest impact factor were significantly associated with deficient reports of grade 3-4 AEs (p = 0.02). Under placebo administration, the median incidence of all-grade drug-related AEs was 49 % (IQR 39-56). The median attribution ratio for all-grade AEs in the active and placebo arms was 88.9 % (IQR 79.8-93) and 53.9 % (IQR 43.4-60.9), respectively. The AEs reporting and attribution process appear to be more unreliable than expected., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Burnout (BO) syndrome is a condition that results in physical and mental distress. The current COVID-19 pandemic is strongly affecting the mental health of the general population. We aimed to assess the incidence of BO among medical oncologists and determine factors associated with burnout levels during the current pandemic., Methods: A digital survey was created for this study. The Spanish-validated version of Maslach BO Inventory was incorporated to define BO. Social and demographic information was analysed to remove duplicated answers., Results: A total of 188 Argentinian medical oncologists from 16 cities participated in the survey. The median age of the participants was 43 years (IQR 38-50) and a similar distribution between male and female was observed. At the time of the survey, Argentina was in the third month of strict lockdown. Most of the participants practiced in both public and private practice facilities (55.3%) and the majority reported more than 10 years of experience (53.2%). Twenty-five percent (43) of subjects reported high levels of DP, 39.9% (75) reported high levels of EE and 53.7% (101) reported low levels of PA. BO Maslach criteria were fulfilled by 14.9% (28). We compared this result with other burnout assessment tools. Using the Gil-Monte and Neira tool, BO-associated domains were altered in 77.1%, 42% and 42% for EE, DP, and PA domains, respectively. Concomitantly, under Neira assessment a domain impairment was appreciated in 77.1%, 76% and 54% respectively. BO criteria were met by 30.3% (57) according to Gil-Monte and 47.9% (90) to Neira., Conclusion: BO is a multifaceted issue with a negative impact on physicians, patients, and institutions. During the COVID-19 pandemic, BO criteria was met in a considerable proportion of survey respondents using MBI, and Peiro and Neiro tools and younger age, use of antidepressants and psychological medications and income reduction arose as statistically significant factors after multivariate analysis., Competing Interests: None of the authors have conflicts of interest to declare., (© the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience.)

Introduction: Breast cancer is the tumor with highest incidence in women worldwide and adjuvant treatment is extremely important to achieve disease control. Given the relevance of systematic reviews, their rigor should be warranted to avoid biased conclusions. Our objective was to investigate the methodological quality of meta-analysis of early breast cancer adjuvant treatment., Material and Methods: Comprehensive searches were performed using electronic databases from 1/1/2007 to 11/12/2018. All studies identified as a systematic review with meta-analysis investigating the efficacy of breast cancer adjuvant treatments were included. Two reviewers independently assessed titles and abstracts, then full-texts for eligibility. Quality was assessed using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) version 2 tool., Results: Of 950 citations retrieved, 66 studies (7.0%) were deemed eligible. Methodological quality was highly variable, median AMSTAR score 8.5 (IQR 7-9.5) and range 0-16. There was a weak positive correlation between journal impact factor and AMSTAR score (r = 0.17) and citation rate and AMSTAR score (r = 0.16). Cochrane Systematic Reviews were of higher quality than reviews from other journals. Overall confidence was critically low for 61 (92.4%) studies, and the least well-reported domains were the statement of conflict of interest and funding source for the included studies (4.6%), the report of a pre-defined study protocol (15.2%), and the description of details of excluded studies (6.1%)., Conclusions: Our findings reinforce concerns about the design, conduction and interpretation of meta-analysis in current literature. Methodological quality should be carefully considered and journal editors, decision makers and readers in general, must follow a critical approach to this studies., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Effective networking and mentoring are critical determinants of professional satisfaction and success in oncology. There are multiple benefits associated with established mentoring programs. However, these are scarce in Latin America (LATAM). The AAZPIRE project meeting was held to encourage the discussion of mentorship strategies in our region, to create new learning frameworks, and improve cancer care. A group of 30 young oncologists and investigators, together with seven members of LACOG and CLICaP experts of 8 LATAM countries, were reunited to share views and define opportunities, barriers, and possible solutions to implement mentorship programs in LATAM. For each of the mentioned topics, key points were obtained by consensus, and a literature review was conducted to support group conclusions. This article analyses mentoring in LATAM countries and its role on promoting leadership. It will address conceptual frameworks, limitations, and opportunities from the perspectives of both mentor and mentee. The creation of regional and international group stimulation programs and joint projects that impact health policies are attractive, starting points to implement mentorship scenarios., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author (s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.)

Background: The COVID-19 outbreak has resulted in collision between patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 and those with cancer on different fronts. Patients with cancer have been impacted by deferral, modification, and even cessation of therapy. Adaptive measures to minimize hospital exposure, following the precautionary principle, have been proposed for cancer care during COVID-19 era. We present here a consensus on prioritizing recommendations across the continuum of sarcoma patient care., Material and Methods: A total of 125 recommendations were proposed in soft-tissue, bone, and visceral sarcoma care. Recommendations were assigned as higher or lower priority if they cannot or can be postponed at least 2-3 months, respectively. The consensus level for each recommendation was classified as "strongly recommended" (SR) if more than 90% of experts agreed, "recommended" (R) if 75%-90% of experts agreed and "no consensus" (NC) if fewer than 75% agreed. Sarcoma experts from 11 countries within the Sarcoma European-Latin American Network (SELNET) consortium participated, including countries in the Americas and Europe. The European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of clinical benefit scale was applied to systemic-treatment recommendations to support prioritization., Results: There were 80 SRs, 35 Rs, and 10 NCs among the 125 recommendations issued and completed by 31 multidisciplinary sarcoma experts. The consensus was higher among the 75 higher-priority recommendations (85%, 12%, and 3% for SR, R, and NC, respectively) than in the 50 lower-priority recommendations (32%, 52%, and 16% for SR, R, and NC, respectively)., Conclusion: The consensus on 115 of 125 recommendations indicates a high-level of convergence among experts. The SELNET consensus provides a tool for sarcoma multidisciplinary treatment committees during the COVID-19 outbreak., Implications for Practice: The Sarcoma European-Latin American Network (SELNET) consensus on sarcoma prioritization care during the COVID-19 era issued 125 pragmatical recommendations distributed as higher or lower priority to protect critical decisions on sarcoma care during the COVID-19 pandemic. A multidisciplinary team from 11 countries reached consensus on 115 recommendations. The consensus was lower among lower-priority recommendations, which shows reticence to postpone actions even in indolent tumors. The European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit scale was applied as support for prioritizing systemic treatment. Consensus on 115 of 125 recommendations indicates a high level of convergence among experts. The SELNET consensus provides a practice tool for guidance in the decisions of sarcoma multidisciplinary treatment committees during the COVID-19 outbreak., (© 2020 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of AlphaMed Press.)