Search

Plasmacytoma is characterized by a local accumulation of monoclonal plasma cells without criteria for multiple myeloma ( MM). The current treatment regimen is local radiotherapy. However, more than 50% of patients develop MM within 2 years after treatment. A population-based registry was consulted for the diagnosis of solitary plasmacytoma between 1988 and 2011. Progression to MM and prognostic features for progression to MM were scored, including hypoxia inducible factors ( HIF), vascular endothelial growth factor ( VEGF, also termed VEGFA) and micro-vessel density ( MVD) expression in biopsy material. A total of 76 patients were included, 34% having extramedullary plasmacytoma ( EMP) while 66% had a solitary plasmacytoma of the bone ( SBP). Median follow-up was 89 months, (7-293 months). In Seventy per cent of SBP patients developed MM with a median time to progression of 19 months (5-293). Three patients (12%) with EMP developed MM. High expression of VEGF and HIF-2α (also termed EPAS1) was demonstrated in conjunction with an increased MVD in 66% of the patients. No association could be shown between angiogenesis parameters and progression to MM. In conclusion, this population-based study demonstrates that SBP patients have a higher risk of developing MM following local radiotherapy, indicating that this group might benefit from added systemic chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Combination therapy for longer periods but at low dose might be an effective and tolerable manner to treat patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). We used bortezomib, dexamethasone and low-dose oral cyclophosphamide as an induction regimen, followed by 1 year of maintenance consisting of bortezomib and cyclophosphamide. Relapsed MM patients were treated with six cycles of bortezomib twice weekly, cyclophosphamide 50 mg daily and dexamethasone. Maintenance therapy was given for 1 year. Primary endpoints were toxicity during re-induction and maintenance therapy. Secondary endpoints were response to treatment and progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). This study included 59 patients. Myelosuppression and neuropathy were the most common side effects. Median follow- up was 27.1 (0.46-54.4) months with an overall response of 71%, and a very good partial response or more of 33%. During maintenance, improved responsiveness was observed in 19% of the patients. The median PFS was 18.4 months (range 0.13-43.5) and the median OS was 28.1 months (range 0.13-54.4). In conclusion, our study demonstrates that treatment with bortezomib, dexamethasone and low-dose cyclophosphamide is an effective and manageable regimen. Adding 1 year of maintenance was feasible, with limited side effects and an increased response rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The level of frailty, according to the IMWG frailty index, is highly dynamic during anti-myeloma treatment. Dynamic frailty assessment improved the prediction of survival and early mortality as compared to the prognostic value of static frailty level at baseline. HOVON 143: NTR6297 HOVON 123: NTR4244., (Copyright © 2024 American Society of Hematology.)

Background: The outcome of non-transplant eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients is heterogeneous, partly depending on frailty level. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the efficacy and safety of Ixazomib-Daratumumab-low-dose dexamethasone (Ixa-Dara-dex) in NDMM intermediate-fit patients., Methods: In this phase II multicenter HOVON-143 study, IMWG Frailty index based intermediate-fit patients, were treated with 9 induction cycles of Ixa-Dara-dex, followed by maintenance with ID for a maximum of 2 years. The primary endpoint was overall response rate on induction treatment. Patients were included from October 2017 until May 2019. Trial Registration Number: NTR6297., Findings: Sixty-five patients were included. Induction therapy resulted in an overall response rate of 71%. Early mortality was 1.5%. At a median follow-up of 41.0 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 18.2 months and 3-year overall survival 83%. Discontinuation of therapy occurred in 77% of patients, 49% due to progression, 9% due to toxicity, 8% due to incompliance, 3% due to sudden death and 8% due to other reasons. Dose modifications of ixazomib were required frequently (37% and 53% of patients during induction and maintenance, respectively), mainly due to, often low grade, polyneuropathy. During maintenance 23% of patients received daratumumab alone. Global quality of life (QoL) improved significantly and was clinically relevant, which persisted during maintenance treatment., Interpretation: Ixazomib-Daratumumab-low-dose dexamethasone as first line treatment in intermediate-fit NDMM patients is safe and improves global QoL. However, efficacy was limited, partly explained by ixazomib-induced toxicity, hampering long term tolerability of this 3-drug regimen. This highlights the need for more efficacious and tolerable regimens improving the outcome in vulnerable intermediate-fit patients., Funding: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited., Competing Interests: Claudia Stege. Speaker's Bureau: Sanofi, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda. Consulting or Advisory Role: Sanofi, Janssen. Marie-Christiane Vekemans. Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events: Amgen, Janssen, Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene. Consulting or Advisory Role: Amgen, Celgene-Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Takeda, Sanofi, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Menarini. Ka-Lung Wu. Consulting or Advisory Role: Pfizer, Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb. Niels W. C. J. van de Donk. Consulting or Advisory Role: Janssen, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Amgen, Servier, Takeda, Bayer, Roche, Pfizer, Abbvie, Adaptive. Research Funding: Janssen, Celgene, Amgen, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cellectis. Gert Jan Timmers. Participation on an Advisory Board: Novartis. Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Novartis, Janssen. Ellen van der Spek. Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events: Janssen. Pieter Sonneveld. Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board: Celgene, Janssen, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Pfizer. Research Funding: Janssen, Amgen, Bristol Myeres Squibb/Celgene, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Pfizer. Inger S. Nijhof. Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events: Janssen, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi. Mark-David Levin. Support for attending meetings and/or travel: Janssen, Takeda. Paula F. Ypma. Payment or honoraria for presentations: Janssen. Support for attending meetings and/or travel: Janssen. Sonja Zweegman. Consulting or Advisory Role: Janssen-Cilag, Takeda, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Oncopeptides (no personal funding). Research Funding: Janssen, Takeda. No other potential conflicts of interest were reported., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

Introduction: Whole-body x-ray (WBX) is used for detecting skeleton abnormalities in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). An alternative might be 18F-FDG PET, which makes use of metabolic changes of malignant cells. The aims of this study were to evaluate whether 18F-FDG PET detects more lesions compared with WBX in patients with relapsing MM and to define its prognostic value. In addition 1-α-D-(5-deoxy-5-[F]-fluoroarabinofuranosyl)-2-nitroimidazole (18F-FAZA) scan and immunohistochemical staining on bone marrow were performed to define whether FDG uptake coincides with angiogenesis-related tumor hypoxia., Patients and Methods: 18F-FDG PET (n = 44) and 18F-FAZA-PET (n = 5) were performed in patients with relapsed MM. Bone marrow biopsies (n = 20) were evaluated for hypoxia inducible factors (HIF) 1α and 2α, vascular endothelial growth factor, glucose transport proteins 1 and 3, and the microvessel density., Results: New lesions were more frequently demonstrated on 18F-FDG PET than on WBX (P = 0.000001). 18F-FDG PET was not predictive for progression-free survival and overall survival. Immunohistochemical staining on bone marrow biopsies demonstrated a significant increase in microvessel density and elevated expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, HIF-2α, and glucose transport protein 3 by the malignant plasma cells. However, HIF-1α expression and 18F-FAZA scan results were negative., Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that 18F-FDG PET is relevant for diagnostic purposes compared with WBX in relapsing MM. The enhanced uptake of 18F-FDG PET is likely related to the activation of the HIF-2α signaling pathway but probably independent of hypoxia-induced signaling in view of the negative findings on both 18F-FAZA-PET and HIF-1α expression.

Purpose: Osseous involvement defined by lytic bone lesions is shown by skeletal survey in multiple myeloma (MM). This technique has limitations because it detects only lesions with more than 30% trabecular bone loss. In addition, lesions persist after chemotherapy, thereby limiting its usefulness at relapsing disease. Alternative techniques to detect new bone lesions are somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) and 18F-fluordeoxyglucose (FDG) PET so far predominantly studied in patients with newly diagnosed MM. Malignant plasma cells can have a high expression of somatostatin receptors and an elevated metabolic activity. Therefore, these techniques might be useful in patients with relapsing MM because they are not hampered by preexisting skeletal defects. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate which technique is most optimal to detect skeletal lesions in patients with relapsing MM., Method: In patients with relapsing MM (n = 21), 3 separate methods were used (skeletal survey, SRS, and FDG PET) for detecting new skeletal lesions., Results: Of all patients, 55% had new lesions on the skeletal survey [mean (SD), 1.45 (1.76); range, 0-5], 52% had new SRS lesions [mean (SD), 1.43 (0.38); range, 0-5], and 71% demonstrated new lesions on the FDG PET-scan [mean (SD), 4.05 (0.9); range, 0-12]. The lesions on skeletal survey and SRS corresponded with FDG PET. The number of lesions was higher with the FDG PET versus that with SRS (P = 0.01) and with FDG PET versus that with skeletal survey (P = 0.01)., Conclusions: The results demonstrate that FDG PET is more valuable than skeletal survey and SRS to detect disease activity in relapsing MM.