Search

This double-blind, double-dummy, randomized clinical trial, conducted in elderly patients with mild hypertension, compared adherence to treatment, efficacy, side effects, and quality of life during treatment with transdermal clonidine versus oral sustained-release verapamil (verapamil-SR). Blood pressure declined significantly--from 148/95 mm Hg at baseline to 139/84 after titration and 135/86 after maintenance--with transdermal clonidine (n = 29), and from 156/96 to 144/85 and 148/88, respectively, with verapamil-SR (n = 29). Adverse event rates and quality-of-life questionnaire responses were similar in the two treatment groups. Transdermal clonidine was worn as directed during more than 96% of patient-weeks of treatment. Compliance with the oral verapamil regimen was less consistent: Verapamil-SR was taken as directed during approximately 50% of patient-weeks of therapy, and individual compliance, assessed by tablet counts, varied from 50-120%. In all, 86% of subjects were satisfied or highly satisfied with the convenience of transdermal therapy; 87% reported that side effects were slightly or not bothersome; 65% indicated that transdermal patches were more convenient than oral therapy; and almost 60% preferred transdermal to oral therapy. In this study transdermal clonidine and oral verapamil were equally safe and effective. A substantial majority of patients preferred transdermal to oral therapy, and adherence to treatment was greater with transdermal therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Objective: To compare the relative bioavailability of two 16-mg extemporaneously prepared suppository formulations with that of an 8-mg commercially available oral tablet., Design: Prospective, crossover bioavailability study., Setting: Inpatient clinical research center., Subjects: Sixteen young, nonsmoking, healthy volunteers., Interventions: Blood samples were obtained 24 and 48 hours after administration of an 8-mg oral ondansetron tablet and 16-mg suppository, respectively. Two 16-mg suppository formulations were compounded using commercially available Fattibase and Polybase., Measurements and Main Results: Ondansetron was well absorbed by both routes of administration. The following pharmacokinetic parameters (mean+/-SEM) were obtained for the 8-mg tablet, 16-mg Fattibase suppository, and 16-mg Polybase suppository, respectively: area under the curve (AUC) in men 154.2+/-21.77, 253.4+/-72.3, 304.8+/-62.2 ng x hr/ml; AUC in women 353.6+/-32.7, 561.6+/-103.6, and 768.7+/-117.9 ng x hr/ml; maximum concentration (Cmax) in men 45.5+/-7.0, 40.6+/-10.4, and 51.2+/-6.7 ng/ml; Cmax in women 51.4+/-.8, 47.1+/-3.9, and 82.9+/-6.6 ng/ml. Times to Cmax (Tmax; mean+/-SEM) for men were 1.5+/-0.3, 4.4+/-0.5, and 2.9+/-0.3 hours; Tmax for women were 1.8+/-0.3, 4.1+/-0.4, and 4.4+/-0.6 hours for the three formulations, respectively. Women had a consistently higher AUC for all three formulations than men (p<0.05)., Conclusion: With the exception of the 16-mg Polybase formulation in women, the two suppositories closely approximated the pharmacokinetics of the 8-mg oral tablet. These results suggest that gender may be a significant factor in ondansetron's disposition.

Objective: To investigate the metabolic effects and frequency of adverse events with 6 mg of glimepiride, a new oral sulfonylurea, given both in once- and twice-daily dosages to patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM)., Research Design and Methods: This 15-week study involved 161 subjects with NIDDM. Subjects were randomized into two groups. For 4 weeks, group 1 received glimepiride 3 mg twice daily, and group 2 received glimepiride 6 mg once daily. After a 3-week placebo-washout period, twice- and once-daily regimens were crossed over for a second 4-week treatment period. Subjects were hospitalized at the end of each placebo or active-treatment phase. Their glucose concentrations were recorded at 20 time points over a 24-hour period, and their insulin and C-peptide concentrations were recorded at 16 time points over the same period. Parameters that were calculated included fasting, 24-hour, and postprandial concentrations of glucose, insulin, and C-peptide., Results: One hundred six patients were randomized to receive treatment; 94 completed the entire study. Existing physiologic mechanisms of glucose control were apparently unimpaired by glimepiride treatment. Insulin concentrations increased more during the postprandial glucose peaks than when subjects were fasting. Both twice- and once-daily regimens proved equally effective in reducing concentrations of fasting, postbreakfast, postlunch, and postdinner plasma glucose. Twenty-four-hour mean glucose concentrations showed a slightly greater decrease from baseline for the twice-daily regimen; the difference between the regimens was statistically significant but not clinically meaningful. The incidence of adverse events with glimepiride approximated that obtained with placebo, with both groups reporting only one adverse event, headache, in more than 5% of the subjects., Conclusions: Glimepiride is equally effective whether administered once or twice daily. Glimepiride seems to stimulate insulin production primarily after meals, when plasma glucose concentrations are highest, but controls blood glucose throughout the day.

The efficacy and safety of amlodipine, 10 mg, a new long-acting calcium antagonist, was compared with placebo in 103 patients with stable angina pectoris in a multicenter double-blind crossover study. The trial consisted of an initial 2-week single-blind placebo period followed by a first period of 4 weeks of double-blind therapy, which was followed by a 1 week washout period and then a second 4-week double-blind period after treatments were crossed over. Twenty-four-hour Holter electrocardiographic monitoring was carried out in 12 patients at three centers. In the first double-blind period amlodipine produced a significantly greater increase in symptom-limited exercise duration (amlodipine 478.5 to 520.6 vs placebo 484.6 to 485.2 seconds; change +8.8% vs +0.1%, respectively; p = 0.0004) and total work (amldipine 2426 to 2984 vs placebo 2505 to 2548 kilopondmeters; change +24% vs +1.7%, respectively; p = 0.0006) and a decrease in angina attack frequency (from 3 to 1 per week; p = 0.016) and nitroglycerin consumption (from 2 to 0.5 tablets/wk; p = 0.01) compared with placebo. Holter monitoring revealed significant reductions in numbers (amlodipine 4.65 to 2.22 vs placebo 1.84 to 1.54; change -52% vs +84%, respectively; p = 0.06), absolute total area (amlodipine 87.66 to 11.43 vs placebo 5.76 to 35.24; change -87% vs +513%, respectively; p = 0.02), and duration (amlodipine 12.29 to 2.95 vs 1.66 to 7.74 seconds; change -76% vs +367%, respectively; p = 0.008) of ST-segment depressions after treatment with amlodipine compared with placebo. After the treatments were crossed over changes continued to favor amlodipine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Losartan potassium (DuP 753), an orally active angiotensin II receptor antagonist, is metabolized to a more potent active metabolite, E-3174, which contributes to losartan's long duration of action. The acute pharmacodynamic actions of intravenous (i.v.) E-3174 (20 mg infused over 4 h) were compared to placebo (vehicle) in two groups of patients with essential hypertension. Patients with supine diastolic blood pressure (SuDBP) of 100 to 120 mm Hg entered a 2-day inpatient phase and received vehicle on day 1. Patients with SuDBP > or = 95 mm Hg were randomized to double-blind treatment the next day. E-3174 significantly (P < .05) reduced SuDBP compared to placebo, beginning at approximately 100 min after the start of the infusion, with a maximum hypotensive effect at 8 h. Supine systolic blood pressure was also reduced by E-3174. Supine and standing heart rates did not differ between treatments. Mean E-3174 plasma levels were 324.6 ng/mL at 20 min and approximately 1000 ng/mL at the end of the 4-h infusion; during this time there was a modest decrease in blood pressure. Following the infusion, the relationship between plasma E-3174 levels and SuDBP was confounded by much larger decreases in blood pressure, which occurred as plasma drug concentrations declined. Urinary excretions of sodium, potassium, or chloride were not significantly altered by E-3174 nor was the fractional excretion of uric acid significantly different between groups. There were no drug-related or serious adverse experiences and no patient discontinued treatment due to an adverse experience.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The pharmacokinetics of flosequinan and its active metabolite, flosequinoxan, were investigated following a single 100-mg oral dose in 10 patients with compromised hepatic function. Plasma and urine samples were collected for up to 144 h postdose and analyzed by HPLC. All 10 patients provided analyzable data even though one patient withdrew before the 144-h sample because of an adverse event unrelated to the study medication. Interpatient variability was appreciable for the plasma and urine concentrations was well as for the calculated pharmacokinetic parameters. Relative to a comparative cohort of normal subjects, flosequinan concentrations in the study patients were elevated, showing increases in mean AUC0-t (62.8 +/- 49.4 vs 3.4 +/- 1.5 micrograms.h/mL), AUC0-infinity (70.2 +/- 58.3 vs 3.8 +/- 1.6 micrograms.h/m:), Cmax (2.43 +/- 0.56 vs 1.30 +/- 0.39 micrograms/mL), and t1/2 (20.7 +/- 16.8 vs 1.7 +/- 0.5 h). The mean systemic clearance decreased (47.3 +/- 46.5 vs 544 +/- 279 mL/min), along with the elimination rate constant (0.066 +/- 0.069 vs 0.44 +/- 0.13 h-1). Mean flosequinoxan AUC0-t and AUC0-infinity values were unaffected by hepatic dysfunction. The mean time to peak was longer (36.4 +/- 27.4 vs 7.0 +/- 3.1 h) and Cmax was less (0.98 +/- 0.52 vs 1.84 +/- 0.26 micrograms/mL) than in normal subjects. These findings are consistent with a decrease in the rate of flosequinan metabolism to flosequinoxan. Five patients reported adverse events, which included headache (three patients) and syncope (one patient).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Indomethacin, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, may cause gastric mucosal damage as shown by fecal blood loss. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study was conducted to determine the effects of 400 mcg b.i.d. misoprostol, a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analog, on intestinal blood loss caused by 50 mg t.i.d. indomethacin. Forty-two arthritic patients, mean age 59 years, received indomethacin for 14 days. Those with baseline blood loss of at least 1.5 ml/day during the first 7 days were randomized to 400 mcg of misoprostol or placebo (days 8 to 14). Fecal blood loss was measured using 51Cr labelled red blood cell technique. Success was defined as a reduction in mean daily blood loss of at least 50% during the treatment period compared to mean daily blood loss during the baseline (pre-treatment) phase. The mean daily blood loss on treatment days 9-15 was not significantly reduced from baseline in either group. These data neither confirm nor deny the effectiveness of misoprostol in reducing fecal blood loss caused by indomethacin. The results may have been confounded by the administration of misoprostol twice daily while indomethacin was administered three times daily. In addition, fecal blood loss as an indicator of gastrointestinal mucosal damage is not a sensitive measure; it is characterized by poor reproducibility and wide fluctuations within individual responses. Inappropriate laboratory techniques may have further reduced the sensitivity and reliability of this procedure.

The pharmacokinetics of flosequinan and its major active metabolite (BTS 53,554, 7-fluoro-1-methyl-3 methylsulfinyl-4-quinolone, 1) were investigated following a single oral dose of 100 mg of flosequinan in 20 patients with severe renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance, < or = 25 mL/min). Plasma and urine samples were collected for 144 h post-dose and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Flosequinan was well absorbed and rapidly eliminated, reaching mean peak concentrations in plasma of 1.37 +/- 0.67 micrograms/mL at 1.6 +/- 1.4 h post-dose. As in healthy volunteers, approximately 1% of the administered dose of flosequinan was excreted unchanged in urine. Renal clearance of flosequinan was decreased by an average of 20% relative to healthy volunteers. The active metabolite 1 reached mean peak concentrations in plasma of 2.22 +/- 0.58 micrograms/mL at 10.9 +/- 5.9 h post-dose and yielded mean areas under the curve of concentration in plasma versus time twice that of healthy volunteers. Elimination rates for 1 decreased by half, and the mean elimination half-life increased to 68.5 +/- 24.2 h compared with 34.5 +/- 6.7 h for healthy volunteers. The decrease in elimination rate resulted in higher exposure to total active drug substance (flosequinan plus metabolite) for renal patients than for healthy volunteers. These results suggest dosage adjustments may be necessary in patients with severe renal dysfunction to prevent excessive accumulation of 1 with repeated dosage of flosequinan.

In a double-blind, crossover study, five white men with mild-to-moderate hypertension received placebo and fixed doses of atenolol, metoprolol, chlorthalidone, verapamil, and the combination of atenolol and chlorthalidone in a quasi-random order. Daily dosages were: atenolol, 100 mg; metoprolol, 200 mg; chlorthalidone, 50 mg; verapamil, 240 mg; and the same doses of atenolol and chlorthalidone in combination. Standard office and daytime ambulatory blood pressures were assessed at the end of each month-long trial. Atenolol, metoprolol, chlorthalidone, and verapamil controlled office blood pressure with similar reductions. Verapamil did not lower ambulatory blood pressure at this dose (which is lower than is now commonly used), but reductions in ambulatory blood pressure were similar for atenolol, metoprolol, and chlorthalidone. The combination of atenolol and chlorthalidone maintained blood pressure control more effectively than the single drug treatments in both office and ambulatory settings, and the combined hypotensive effects were additive. However, reductions in the office due to the combination appeared to overestimate hypotensive effectiveness in the ambulatory setting. This study suggests that the effectiveness of commonly prescribed antihypertensive regimens varies according to setting as well as drug, and that assessment of treatment effectiveness can be improved by automated ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

This open crossover study in eight hypertensive patients defined a possible additive effect of oral guanabenz and captopril and determined a safe and effective dose range. Each group of four patients received placebo followed by ascending doses (on alternate days) of either guanabenz (2, 4, 8 mg) or captopril (6.25, 12.5, 25 mg) as initial monotherapy and were subsequently crossed over to the alternate monotherapy. Guanabenz and captopril were given concomitantly in increasing doses--the highest dose for both groups being 8 mg guanabenz/25 mg captopril. When guanabenz and captopril were given concomitantly, blood pressure decreased, both from the values during placebo administration and from the lead-in values recorded before each dose. Mean supine systolic and diastolic blood pressures after combination therapy decreased significantly (P less than .05) in a dose-related manner at most evaluations. The authors conclude that guanabenz and captopril have an additive effect when administered in combination to patients with hypertension.

Steady state pharmacokinetics, absolute bioavailability, and dose proportionality of cefepime were evaluated in healthy male subjects after single (250, 500, 1000, or 2000 mg) and multiple (1000 mg every 12 hours for 10 days) intramuscular injections. Safety and tolerance were also monitored. High performance liquid chromatography/UV methodology was used to determine cefepime concentrations in plasma and urine. Key pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using noncompartmental methods. Cefepime was absorbed rapidly; mean peak times were 1.0-1.6 hours. Pharmacokinetics were linear over the 250-mg to 2000-mg dose range, with mean total body clearance ranging from 125 to 141 mL/min. The peak plasma concentration and area under the curve increased in a dose-proportional manner. The apparent elimination half-life (2 hours) did not appear to be influenced by dose or by duration of dosing. No accumulation of cefepime was observed during the multiple-dose study. More than 80% of the administered dose was excreted in the urine as unchanged cefepime, and absolute bioavailability after intramuscular dose was 100%. Cefepime was well tolerated. Most subjects experienced none to mild pain and only minimum discomfort at the site of injection.

Ambulatory blood pressure was studied as a function of posture, place, and mood in 131 subjects classified according to race, gender, and hypertensive status. The effect of posture was significant and explained a substantial proportion of within-subject variability. After controlling for posture, significant place and mood effects were observed when subjects were sitting but not when they were standing. Home vs. work differences in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure were significantly greater in Whites than in Blacks. Similar differences in systolic blood pressure were greater in mild hypertensive than in normotensive subjects. The results of this study underscore the need to control for effects of posture when interpreting ambulatory blood pressure readings.

The safety and efficacy of labetalol and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) were compared in a group of 34 patients aged 65 years or older with mild to moderate essential hypertension. After a 4-week placebo run-in period, during which all previous antihypertensive medication was discontinued, patients were randomized to receive either labetalol (100 mg bid) or HCTZ (25 mg bid). The patients' blood pressure and heart rate were evaluated biweekly and drug dosage was titrated (up to 400 mg and 50 mg bid of labetalol and HCTZ, respectively) to achieve a standing diastolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg. Patients underwent 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring at the end of the placebo run-in period and again after the 6-week titration period. Both labetalol and HCTZ significantly (P less than .01) reduced standing systolic (-19.4 vs -27.7 mm Hg) and diastolic (-14.0 vs -15.2 mm Hg) blood pressures following 12 weeks of treatment. Both antihypertensives effectively controlled the 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure, however, the labetalol group experienced a significantly lower rate of rise in diastolic blood pressure (P = .02) and mean arterial pressure (P = .02) during the acceleration period (400-1200) compared to the HCTZ group. HCTZ caused significant decreases in serum potassium (P less than .01) and alkaline phosphatase (P less than .05) and increases in uric acid (P less than .01) and urea nitrogen (P = .07). These results indicate that labetalol may offer some unique advantages over thiazide diuretics that may be particularly important in the treatment of elderly patients with hypertension.

We determined the ability of a new opioid antagonist, naimefene, to prevent fentanyl-induced respiratory depression in 8 healthy male volunteers. Ventilation and pulmonary function were measured with the respiratory inductive plethysmograph (RIP), which is non-invasive and requires no connection to the airway. Each volunteer was tested two times on different days. During the first session, each volunteer was monitored for one hour of baseline measurement followed by 4 hourly injections of fentanyl (1 microgram/kg) administered in an open-label manner. In the second session, the subjects were monitored for one hour after 1 mg of intravenous nalmefene was administered. Intravenous fentanyl or identical placebo were then given in a double-blind manner as in the first session. Progressive and profound respiratory depression occurred with fentanyl administration alone. In the absence of nalmefene, fentanyl converted normal breathing pattern to an irregular breathing pattern. When the subjects were treated with nalmefene prior to fentanyl administration, all of these changes were almost completely prevented. Pulmonary variables which reflected this difference between the fentanyl-alone group and the nalmefene-pretreated groups included frequency (p less than 0.001), tidal volume (p less than 0.001), percent rib cage contribution to tidal volume (p less than 0.001) and expiratory time (p less than 0.001). This study showed that nalmefene is an effective long-acting opioid antagonist, and that RIP accurately measures changes in respiration caused by opioid administration.

The elderly are likely candidates to receive analgesics for pain from a variety of etiologies. Ketorolac tromethamine is a nonsteroidal, analgesic, anti-inflammatory, antipyretic investigational drug with anti-prostaglandin synthetase activity. Sixteen healthy, young men (mean age 30 years and mean weight 75 kg) and 13 healthy, elderly subjects (11 men and two women; mean age 72 years and mean weight 75 kg) participated in an open-label, parallel single-dose study. On each day of ketorolac tromethamine administration the subjects fasted overnight and for 2 hours post-dose. A single intramuscular (IM) dose of 30 mg of ketorolac tromethamine was administered followed by an oral dose (PO) of 10 mg after a 1 week washout period for the elderly subjects. Plasma samples were taken from 0 through 48 hours post-dose and analyzed for ketorolac by HPLC. The elimination of ketorolac was decreased slightly in the elderly following both doses, as evidenced by a prolongation in half-life (4.7 to 6.1 hours for PO and 4.5 to 7.0 hours for IM) and a reduced total plasma clearance compared to the young adult subjects. These differences were statistically significant (P less than .001). Considerable overlap frequently was observed when comparing the range of values obtained for the young and elderly for plasma half-life, clearance, AUC, Tmax and Cmax. The absorption of ketorolac tromethamine was not altered substantially in the elderly following either dose route. Ketorolac plasma protein binding was not altered substantially in the elderly. The present results show that the elderly may need slightly less frequent dosing of ketorolac than young adults to maintain similar plasma levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The selectivity of the beta-adrenoceptor blockade produced by single oral doses of cetamolol, atenolol, and nadolol was compared in normal male subjects. Study 1 established the dose at which each drug provides equivalent beta-1 blockade. Beta-1 blockade was estimated using the degree of inhibition of the increased heart rate (HR) response to graded exercise. Cetamolol (30 mg), atenolol (100 mg), and nadolol (80 mg) all attenuated the HR response to a comparable extent. This result established that the dose ratio of cetamolol:atenolol:nadolol of 1.00:3.33:2.67 provides equipotent beta-1 blockade. This ratio of doses was used in Studies 2 and 3 to evaluate the antagonism of beta-2-mediated responses to titrated doses of intravenous isoproterenol (ISO) by low and high doses of each drug. Beta-2 blockade was assessed using the attenuation of ISO-induced reductions in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in Study 2 and ISO-induced increases in specific airway conductance (sGAW) in Study 3. For within drug comparisons, antagonism of the HR increase induced by ISO (a response mediated by both beta-1 and beta-2 receptors) was also examined. Treatments included cetamolol (15 and 60 mg), atenolol (50 and 200 mg), and nadolol (40 and 160 mg in Study 2; 40 mg only in Study 3). All drugs tested suppressed the HR, DBP, and sGAW responses to ISO, and this blockade was dose dependent. Cetamolol and nadolol produced approximately equipotent beta-1 blockade, whereas cetamolol at both doses produced a less potent beta-2 blockade. Atenolol antagonized ISO effects on all parameters less than either cetamolol or nadolol. Quantitative cardioselectivity indices revealed that cetamolol 60 mg was the most cardioselective and nadolol 40 mg the least. Data from the three studies demonstrate that cetamolol is cardioselective relative to nadolol and that, in contrast to atenolol, cardioselectivity appears to increase at the higher dose.

Acebutolol, a beta-1 selective beta blocker with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity has been shown to be an effective agent in chronic angina pectoris therapy, with twice or three times daily dosing. The long-term effects of 400 mg of acebutolol given only once a day versus placebo on exercise hemodynamics, ST segment depression, and rate pressure product were studied. Eleven patients (mean age, 60 +/- 12 years) with hypertension and chronic angina pectoris were enrolled. Resting heart rate was not significantly altered after therapy, (80 vs 72 bpm). Objective measurements from exercise treadmill tests showed significant reduction in peak heart rate from 130 to 103 bpm, systolic blood pressure from 197 to 167 mm Hg, rate pressure product (from 25 to 18 bpm-mm Hg X 1000), and ST depression in patients receiving acebutolol compared with those receiving placebo. No significant adverse effects were reported. These data indicate that acebutolol may be efficacious as once daily therapy for chronic stable angina pectoris.

The relationship between blood pressure in the laboratory (both at rest and in response to laboratory tasks) and ambulatory blood pressure at home and at work was evaluated. One hundred nineteen normotensive and unmedicated mild-moderate hypertensive black and white females and males participated in laboratory blood pressure monitoring at rest and during four challenging tasks (structured interview, video game, bicycle exercise, and cold pressor test) as well as ambulatory blood pressure monitoring while at home and at work. Baseline blood pressure taken while subjects were at rest was the strongest predictor of ambulatory systolic blood pressure (r = .64) and diastolic blood pressure (r = .77) at work. Among reactivity tasks the strongest predictors of ambulatory blood pressure in the total population were the structured interview and the video game (both psychological tasks) followed by the cold pressor test. Racial comparisons, however, determined that the cold pressor test predicted diastolic blood pressure significantly better for blacks (r = .73) than for whites (r = .40), suggesting a possible difference in blood pressure regulation.

One hour after intravenous doses of 50 mg/d fluconazole for 6 days or 100 mg/d for seven days to healthy subjects, the cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of fluconazole were 1.26 mg/L and 2.74 mg/L, respectively. These values were approximately 52% and 62% those of serum. Four patients with an initial clinical diagnosis of meningitis also had significant concentrations of fluconazole in the cerebrospinal fluid.

24 h after ligation of the left middle cerebral artery in cats (sham operation in the control group), a constant intravenous infusion of digoxin was begun and continued to toxicity (ventricular rhythm) and death. We found that the lethal dose of digoxin was significantly less in the stroke group than in the control group, but the lethal plasma digoxin concentration was significantly greater in the stroke group than in the control group. In a subsequent study, we demonstrated that ischemic stroke caused a significant prolongation in the elimination half-life of digoxin and an increase in the volume of distribution. The mean plasma clearance of the stroke group was approximately three fourths of that of the control group. We concluded that the decreased tolerance to digoxin after ischemic stroke was due to the prolonged half-life and decreased clearance of digoxin.

The pharmacokinetic properties of thiopental were studied in 10 asphyxiated neonates (mean +/- SE; birth weight, 3,244 +/- 212 g; gestational age, 40 +/- 1 weeks) as part of a randomized, controlled trial which tested the ability of barbiturate therapy to decrease central nervous system damage secondary to perinatal asphyxia. Therapy was begun at a mean age of 2.3 h in all and was initially given as a loading dose of 15 mg/kg over 30 min followed by a constant infusion. The mean steady-state thiopental concentration was 13.4 +/- 3.7 micrograms/ml (mean +/- SD) and the average time to reach steady state was 7 +/- 5 h. Mean elimination half-life, plasma clearance and volume of distribution for thiopental were 39 h (range 26-70), 66 ml/(h x kg) (range 31-172), and 3.6 liters/kg (range 1.1-6.7), respectively. Arterial blood pressure support was required in 8 of 10 patients. While it appears feasible to give thiopental to the asphyxiated neonate at the reported infusion rates, the risk-benefit ratio is increased by the frequent associated hypotension and need for pharmacologic blood pressure support.

In an open-labeled trial with eight elderly patients (aged 62 to 87 years) suffering from nocturnal leg cramps refractory to treatment with quinine sulfate, we ruled out other active disease processes and substituted verapamil hydrochloride therapy (120 mg at bedtime). Response to treatment was assessed by biweekly observations by the primary care physician and nightly by the research registered nurse for the entire duration of the trial, lasting eight weeks. Observations made and clinical conditions reported were indicative of improvement and disappearance of cramping when therapy was changed from quinine to verapamil. This noteworthy improvement in patients with recumbent nocturnal leg cramps is an important finding and merits further investigation.

Long-acting propranolol (Inderal LA) is a new formulation of propranolol that allows release of the drug in a controlled manner, so that the plasma concentration at 24 hr after dosing is greater with long-acting propranolol than with conventional tablets. A single dose of 160 mg of long-acting propranolol can produce cardiac beta-adrenoceptor blockade throughout a 24 hr period without variability due to multiple peak concentrations. It has been shown that this formulation is as effective in the treatment of angina pectoris, hypertension and hyperthyroidism as the standard formulation. Studies with long-acting propranolol in cardiac dysrhythmias are lacking. This new dosage form would be a means of simplifying dosing regimens and thereby hopefully enhancing patient convenience and compliance.

This investigation was conducted to compare the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of single and multiple doses of conventional propranolol and long-acting propranolol in healthy human volunteers. Two double-blind, randomized, double-crossover, Latin square studies were carried out. One study evaluated long-acting propranolol 160 mg/d, conventional propranolol 40 mg qid, or placebo for seven days in 24 men. The other study compared long-acting propranolol 80 mg/d, conventional propranolol 20 mg qid, or placebo for seven days in 27 men. At specific times after the administration, blood samples were obtained, and heart rate and blood pressure were measured; exercise tests were done both on the first day and at steady state (day 7). In both studies, the area under the plasma propranolol concentration-time curve and the peak concentration were significantly less (P less than .0001) after the administration of long-acting propranolol compared with conventional propranolol on both day 1 and day 7; in addition, the elimination half-life was longer after administration of the long-acting preparation (9 hr) compared with that following the conventional dosage form (4 hr). Both conventional and long-acting propranolol significantly decreased the exercise heart rate at each of the selected time points (P less than .05) compared with placebo. Reduction in exercise heart rate was greater with conventional propranolol than with the long-acting formulation, but the differences were not statistically significant, when exercise was performed only at trough levels of the conventional drug. The decreases in exercise heart rate were correlated with plasma propranolol concentrations.

Pirmenol is a new orally effective antiarrhythmic agent. Reported are the results of oral administration of pirmenol to six patients (age 48.5 +/- 8.6 years, weight 83 +/- 15 kg) with stable ventricular extrasystoles (PVCs)--average ectopy rate 1040 +/- 630/hr (mean +/- SD). Patients received oral doses of placebo or 200 mg of pirmenol in a double-blind cross-over fashion followed by a single-blind rising-dose administration of 250 mg and 300 mg of pirmenol. The time period between doses was 48 hours. Pirmenol was rapidly absorbed (time to peak plasma levels 1 to 1.5 hours) and the mean maximum plasma concentrations were 1.8, 2.7 and 3.4 micrograms/mL with 200-mg, 250-mg and 300-mg doses, respectively. The elimination half-life was 9.3 +/- 3.0 hours and 31 +/- 14% of the dose was recovered in urine. The response criterion (80% suppression of PVCs of control for 8 hours) was met after the 300-mg dose in three patients. In three patients greater than 80% reduction occurred for up to 8 hours after the 200-mg dose. Pirmenol administration was not associated with any significant changes in blood pressure, heart rate, hepatic and renal function, PR interval or QRS duration. LV ejection fraction determined echocardiographically decreased from 63.0 +/- 6.9% predose to 59.7 +/- 5.0% about 2 hours after the 300-mg dose and QT interval increased by less than 10%. Two patients complained of transient bad taste sensation. Our results suggest that 250 mg to 300 mg of pirmenol, administered twice a day will suppress the PVCs effectively.

The aim of these studies was to further delineate pharmacokinetic characteristics of ranitidine, a new histamine H2-receptor antagonist. In one study, ranitidine was administered orally to six normal men in increasing doses of 100 mg, 150 mg, 250 mg, and 400 mg weekly over a four-week period. The peak serum concentrations increased with the corresponding increases in dose but the time needed to reach peak serum concentration did not vary significantly with increased doses. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated for each subject at each of the four dose levels. The total area under the curve (AUC) at the four different doses was linearly related to the dose for each individual subject; and a plot of AUC versus dose had a correlation coefficient of .886 (P less than .001). The apparent plasma clearance did not vary with the increase in dose; and the average corrected clearance values ranged between 6.7 and 10 mL/(min X kg). Elimination half-life was between 2.6 and 3.0 hours; and the volume of distribution (Vd area) was between 1.6 and 2.4 L/kg. About 35% of the ranitidine dose was excreted in the urine in the unchanged form over a 12-hour excretion interval. In the second study, ranitidine was administered orally to 12 normal subjects in doses of 150 mg and 200 mg twice daily for 28 days. The pharmacokinetic parameters for ranitidine with multiple-dose treatment were similar to those obtained with single-dose administration. Predose ranitidine concentrations (trough levels) did not increase with multiple dose administration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The aims of this study were to describe the pharmacokinetics of propranolol in the cat, to compare pharmacokinetic parameters for propranolol in the cat with those of four other species and to apply the two-step infusion method of Wagner (Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 16, 691-700, 1974) in order to attain a rapid steady-state level for propranolol in plasma. Seven healthy adult cats received propranolol either as an I.V. bolus or by the two-step I.V. infusion method. The latter method was very effective in rapidly attaining and maintaining steady-state plasma propranolol levels. Pharmacokinetic parameters for propranolol in the cat are as follows: plasma clearance, 31.3 ml/(kg x min); volume of distribution, 1.57 L/kg; elimination half-life, 35 min. When compared with other species, the order of plasma clearances for propranolol were: rat greater than dog greater than cat greater than man greater than monkey. A plot of total area under the plasma propranolol concentration-time curve versus dose was not linear at the lower doses, but was linear at doses greater than 0.242 mg/kg.

A single-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to determine the dose-response relationship of guanabenz, administered as single oral doses to patients with mild or moderate hypertension. Twelve hypertensive patients received ascending oral doses of 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, and 32 mg of guanabenz. Dose-response relationships were evaluated for the nine patients who received placebo and all six guanabenz doses. The greatest maximum response (40/24 mm Hg) was seen for the 16 mg guanabenz dose. Since eight of the nine patients had mild hypertension, they may have responded maximally to the lower guanabenz doses, precluding larger decreases with the 24 and 32 mg doses. The mean onset of satisfactory blood pressure reduction decreased from 4 to 2 h and the mean duration increased from 6 to 22 h as the oral dose was increased from 2 to 32 mg. In eight patients, the responses to 16 mg of guanabenz administered sublingually and orally were compared. The sublingual and oral routes produced similar mean (20/13 mm Hg) and maximum (33/24 mm Hg) blood pressure decreases as well as mean onset (2 h) and duration (16.5 h) of satisfactory response. Additional studies involving patients with more severe hypertension are needed to further characterize the dose-response relationship of oral guanabenz and to establish a dose-response relationship for sublingual guanabenz.