Search

The article discusses two legal cases related to civil commitment and competency to stand trial. In the first case, a federal prisoner challenged his indefinite civil commitment prior to release, but the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's decision, stating that there was sufficient evidence to establish a causal nexus between the prisoner's mental condition and his dangerousness. In the second case, the North Carolina Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the lower courts, which declined to conduct a formal competency hearing for a defendant who attempted suicide, ruling that the trial court did not violate the Constitution or state statutes. These cases highlight the complexities and tensions involved in balancing individual rights and public safety in the legal system. [Extracted from the article]

The article focuses on the case of Commonwealth v. Carson C., where a juvenile argued that his due process rights were violated when the judge denied his motion for a competency evaluation at arraignment. Topics include the facts of the case, the judge's decisions on the continuance motion and the petition for expungement, and the Supreme Judicial Court's ruling that the judge did not abuse his discretion and that due process protections were satisfied.

The article presents a case of Donald Wilson versus Adams, in which the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals highlights the district court's dismissal of a prisoner's Eighth Amendment claims and state-law negligence claim. It discussed the insufficient evidence in the medical records and highlights the negligence towards the treatment of the prisoner's mental and physical health.

Decades of research have focused on understanding and addressing racial disparities that occur at every stage of processing in the juvenile justice system. Leaders in the field have raised concerns about the differential treatment and selection of youth based on race. Taking into consideration Sussman and colleagues' results regarding the use of manifest injustice in Washington State, we review briefly the legislative changes that have occurred nationally to address the problem of disproportionate minority contact. We also consider data and hypotheses that have increased our understanding of why and how these racial disparities occur. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a U.S. Supreme Court case, "Shoop v. Hill." It discusses that U.S. Supreme Court vacated and remanded a Sixth Circuit appellate court's decision to grant habeas relief for a respondent who argued that his death penalty sentence was contrary to clearly established federal law due to his intellectual disability.

The article discusses a judicial review court case Shinal v. Toms in which the court reversed lower court's decision on delegation of physician's responsibility in obtaining patient's informed consent.