Search

Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of basal insulin glargine 100 units/ml (Gla) + 2‐3 oral antihyperglycaemic drugs (OADs) with twice‐daily premixed insulin aspart 70/30 (Asp30) + metformin (MET) after short‐term intensive insulin therapy in adults with type 2 diabetes in China. Materials and Methods: This open‐label trial enrolled insulin‐naïve adults with type 2 diabetes and an HbA1c of 7.5%‐11.0% (58‐97 mmol/mol) despite treatment with 2‐3 OADs. All participants stopped previous OADs except MET, then received short‐term intensive insulin therapy during the run‐in period, when those with a fasting plasma glucose of less than 7.0 mmol/L and 2‐hour postprandial glucose of less than 10.0 mmol/L were randomized to Gla + MET + a dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor or twice‐daily Asp30 + MET. If HbA1c was more than 7.0% (>53 mmol/mol) at week 12, participants in the Gla group were added repaglinide or acarbose, at the physician's discretion, and participants in the Asp30 group continued to titrate insulin dose. The change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24 was assessed in the per protocol (PP) population (primary endpoint). Results: There were 384 enrollees (192 each to Gla and Asp30); 367 were included in the PP analysis. The threshold for non‐inferiority of Gla + OADs versus Asp30 + MET was met, with a least squares mean change from baseline in HbA1c of –1.72% and –1.70% (–42.2 and –42.1 mmol/mol), respectively (estimated difference –0.01%; 95% CI –0.20%, 0.17% [–0.1 mmol/mol; 95% CI –2.2, 1.9]). Achievement of HbA1c less than 7.0% (<53 mmol/mol) was comparable between the groups (60% vs. 57%). The proportion of participants with any (24% vs. 38%; P =.003), symptomatic (19% vs. 31%; P =.007) or confirmed hypoglycaemia (18% vs. 33%; P <.001) was lower in the Gla + OADs group. Conclusions: Compared with Asp30 + MET, Gla + 2‐3 OADs showed similar efficacy but a lower hypoglycaemia risk in Chinese individuals with type 2 diabetes who had undergone short‐term intensive insulin therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With type 2 diabetes (T2D) progression, patients require insulin, but insufficient titration often leads to poor glycemic control. A higher insulin starting dose may reduce the optimal dose deficit, but whether this procedure increases hypoglycemia risk is unknown. This open-label, multicenter trial (NCT02836704) evaluated safety and efficacy of a high (0.3 U/kg) vs. standard (0.2 U/kg) starting dose of glargine 100 U/ml (Gla-100) followed by titration over 16 weeks to achieve self-monitored FBG 4.4-5.6 mmol/L using the same algorithm in each group. Overall, 892 patients with overweight/obesity (BMI 25-40 kg/m2) and uncontrolled T2D (HbA1c 7.5-11.0%; lab FPG >9.0 mmol/L) on stable doses of 2-3 OADs were randomized to receive a high (n=444) or standard (n=448) starting dose of Gla-100. At week 16, 92% of patients completed the study and 866 were analyzed. The primary endpoint (percentage of patients with ≥1 confirmed hypoglycemia, BG <3.9 mmol/L) met the pre-specified threshold (upper bound 95% CI <10%) for non-inferiority of Gla-100 0.3 U/kg vs. 0.2 U/kg with 11.0% and 8.6% in the respective groups (log-binomial regression estimated difference 2.1%; 95% CI: −1.68%, 5.89%). At week 16, symptomatic (9.8% vs. 7.0%, p=0.13) and nocturnal hypoglycemia (2.7% vs. 1.2%, p=0.10), percentage of patients achieving HbA1c <7.0% without hypoglycemia (37.1% vs. 37.1%), and percentage of patients achieving lab FPG targets <5.6 mmol/L (15.9% vs. 16.3%), <6.1 mmol/L (27.6% vs. 26.1%), or <7.0 mmol/L (48.8% vs. 48.3%) were all similar in both groups. However, time to achieve first self-monitored FBG <5.6, <6.1, or <7 mmol/L was 6, 9, and 7 days shorter in the 0.3 U/kg group (all p<0.01). In conclusion, among patients with overweight/obesity and T2D, a higher Gla-100 starting dose was as safe as a standard Gla-100 starting dose and achieved FBG targets earlier during the course of therapy. Disclosure: L. Ji: Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca. Consultant; Self; AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck KGaA, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novartis AG, Novo Nordisk A/S, Roche Pharma, Sanofi, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novartis AG, Roche Pharma, Sanofi. H. Wan: None. B. Wen: None. X. Wang: None. J. Wang: Research Support; Self; Sanofi. R. Bian: None. W. Pang: None. W. Feng: Employee; Self; Sanofi. X. Zhang: None. N. Cui: Employee; Self; Sanofi. Funding: Sanofi China [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]