1. Current Preoperative Management of Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Overview.
- Author
-
Della Corte, Luigi, Cafasso, Valeria, Guarino, Maria Chiara, Gullo, Giuseppe, Cucinella, Gaspare, Lopez, Alessandra, Zaami, Simona, Riemma, Gaetano, Giampaolino, Pierluigi, and Bifulco, Giuseppe
- Subjects
- *
SQUAMOUS cell carcinoma , *PREOPERATIVE period , *PREDICTIVE tests , *EARLY detection of cancer , *CANCER patient medical care , *VULVAR tumors , *PREOPERATIVE care , *MAGNETIC resonance imaging , *POSITRON emission tomography , *ULTRASONIC imaging , *PATIENT care , *COLPOSCOPY , *ONCOLOGISTS , *HEALTH care teams - Abstract
Simple Summary: Vulvar cancer is a rare gynecological malignant neoplasm that makes necessary accurate preoperative management in order to stage the patient as best as possible, both locally and at the inguinofemoral lymph node level. The aim of this review is to perform a wide evaluation of all the tools that the clinician has at their disposal for a proper diagnosis, such as vulvoscopy, MRI, PET and ultrasound. Vulvoscopy remains essential to carrying out histological diagnosis. Furthermore, for the evaluation of the local extension of the disease and inguinofemoral and/or pelvic lymph nodes, MRI, PET and, more recently, ultrasound are fundamental. Vulvar carcinoma is a rare cancer affecting the genital tract, constituting 4% of gynecological tumors. Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) is the most common type. Diagnosis relies on biopsy during vulvoscopy, plus imaging such as ultrasonography (USG), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET). This review aims to lay out a thorough overview as to the current preoperative management of VSCC, both in case of vulvar and lymph node involvement. The data research was conducted using the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Sciences, Scopus, ClinicalTrial.gov, OVID and Cochrane Library from 2010 to 2024. The selection criteria included only original articles. Seventeen studies were assessed for eligibility. A concordance rate of 62.3% for vHSIL and 65.2% for carcinoma at vulvoscopy, with a sensitivity of 98%, specificity of 40%, PPV (Positive Predictive Value) of 37% and NPV (Negative Predictive Value) of 98% in identifying malignant lesions was found. Regarding the reliability of PET for staging and assessing lymph node involvement, a mean SUV (Standardized Uptake Value) for malignant vulvar lesions of 8.4 (range 2.5–14.7) was reported. In the case of MRI, useful for the evaluation of loco-regional infiltration and lymph node involvement, the ratio of the short-to-long-axis diameter and the reader's diagnostic confidence for the presence of lymph node metastasis yielded accuracy of 84.8% and 86.9%, sensitivity of 86.7% and 87.5%, specificity of 81.3% and 86.2%, PPV of 89.7% and 87.5% and NPV of 76.5% and 86.2%, respectively. A long lymph node axis >10 mm and a short diameter >5.8 mm were found to be predictors of malignancy. At USG, instead, the two main characteristics of potentially malignant lymph nodes are cortical thickness and short axis length; the combination of these ultrasound parameters yielded the highest accuracy in distinguishing between negative and positive lymph nodes. Despite the heterogeneity of the included studies and the lack of randomized clinical trials, this review provides a broad overview of the three imaging tools used for the presurgical management of VSCC. Nowadays, although MRI and PET represent the gold standard, ultrasound evaluation is taking on a growing role, as long as it is carried out by expert sonographer. The management of this rare disease should be always performed by a multidisciplinary team in order to precisely stage the tumor and determine the most suitable treatment approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF