Search

Background The risk of relapse after anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] therapy discontinuation in Crohn's disease patients with perianal fistulas [pCD] is unclear. We aimed to assess this risk. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted to identify cohort studies on the incidence of relapse following anti-TNF discontinuation in pCD patients. Individual participant data were requested from the original study cohorts. Inclusion criteria were age ≥16 years, pCD as a (co)indication for start of anti-TNF therapy, more than three doses, and remission of luminal and pCD at anti-TNF discontinuation. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of CD relapse using Kaplan–Meier estimates. Secondary outcomes included response to re-treatment and risk factors associated with relapse as assessed by Cox regression analysis. Results In total, 309 patients from 12 studies in ten countries were included. The median duration of anti-TNF treatment was 14 months [interquartile range 5.8–32.5]. Most patients were treated for pCD without active luminal disease [89%], received first-line anti-TNF therapy [87%], and continued immunomodulatory therapy following anti-TNF discontinuation [78%]. The overall cumulative incidence of relapse was 36% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25–48%) and 42% [95% CI 32–53%] at 1 and 2 years after anti-TNF discontinuation, respectively. Risk factors for relapse included smoking (hazard ratio [HR] 1.5 [1.0, 2.1]) and history of proctitis (HR 1.7 [1.1, 2.5]). The overall re-treatment response rate was 82%. Conclusions This individual participant data meta-analysis, on predominantly patients with pCD without active luminal disease and first-line anti-TNF therapy, shows that over half of patients remain in remission 2 years after anti-TNF discontinuation. Therefore, anti-TNF discontinuation may be considered in this subgroup. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims We aimed to assess cost-effectiveness of increasing adalimumab dose intervals compared to the conventional dosing interval in patients with Crohn's disease [CD] in stable clinical and biochemical remission. Design We conducted a pragmatic, open-label, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial, comparing increased adalimumab intervals with the 2-weekly interval in adult CD patients in clinical remission. Quality of life was measured with the EQ-5D-5L. Costs were measured from a societal perspective. Results are shown as differences and incremental net monetary benefit [iNMB] at relevant willingness to accept [WTA] levels. Results We randomized 174 patients to the intervention [ n  = 113] and control [ n  = 61] groups. No difference was found in utility (difference: −0.017, 95% confidence interval [−0.044; 0.004]) and total costs (−€943, [−€2226; €1367]) over the 48-week study period between the two groups. Medication costs per patient were lower (−€2545, [−€2780; −€2192]) in the intervention group, but non-medication healthcare (+€474, [+€149; +€952]) and patient costs (+€365 [+€92; €1058]) were higher. Cost–utility analysis showed that the iNMB was €594 [−€2099; €2050], €69 [−€2908; €1965] and −€455 [−€4,096; €1984] at WTA levels of €20 000, €50 000 and €80 000, respectively. Increasing adalimumab dose intervals was more likely to be cost-effective at WTA levels below €53 960 per quality-adjusted life year. Above €53 960 continuing the conventional dose interval was more likely to be cost-effective. Conclusion When the loss of a quality-adjusted life year is valued at less than €53 960, increasing the adalimumab dose interval is a cost-effective strategy in CD patients in stable clinical and biochemical remission. Clinical Trial Registration Number ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT03172377. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite the introduction of biological therapies, an ileocolonic resection is often required in patients with Crohn's disease [CD]. Unfortunately, surgery is not curative, as many patients will develop postoperative recurrence [POR], eventually leading to further bowel damage and a decreased quality of life. The 8th Scientific Workshop of ECCO reviewed the available scientific data on both prevention and treatment of POR in patients with CD undergoing an ileocolonic resection, dealing with conventional and biological therapies, as well as non-medical interventions, including endoscopic and surgical approaches in case of POR. Based on the available data, an algorithm for the postoperative management in daily clinical practice was developed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background This study aims to comparatively analyze clinical features, treatment, and patient outcomes between the previous and the 2022 mpox (monkeypox) outbreaks. Methods Five bibliographic databases were searched for studies reporting clinical features, management, and patient outcomes of mpox. Systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Results In total, 73 studies were included in the systematic review, of which 33 studies were subjected to meta-analysis. Previous outbreaks substantially affected children, whereas the 2022 outbreak primarily affected male adults, of which 94.66% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88.03–98.95) were men who have sex with men. Furthermore, 72.47% (95% CI, 51.04–89.71) reported high-risk sexual activity and the overall human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevalence was 37.65% (95% CI, 30.09–45.50). Skin lesions remain the typical symptom; however, their anatomic distribution differed. Systemic manifestations were common, but rectal pain was unique to the 2022 outbreak. The estimated overall fatality during past outbreaks in Africa was 4.61% (95% CI, 2.39%–7.35%), whereas 6.34% (95% CI, 3.35%–10.10%) of patients from the 2022 outbreak required hospitalization. Antiviral treatment, in particular tecovirimat, has been prescribed for a subset of patients, but the efficacy remains inconclusive. Conclusions These findings are important for better understanding the disease and guiding adequate response to mpox outbreaks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and aims Despite the advances in medical therapies, a significant proportion of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD] require surgical intervention. This Topical Review aims to offer expert consensus practice recommendations for peri-operative care to optimize outcomes of IBD patients who undergo surgery. Methods A multidisciplinary panel of IBD healthcare providers systematically reviewed aspects relevant to peri-operative care in IBD. Consensus statements were developed using Delphi methodology. Results A total of 20 current practice positions were developed following systematic review of the current literature covering use of medication in the peri-operative period, nutritional assessment and intervention, physical and psychological rehabilitation and prehabilitation, and immediate postoperative care. Conclusion Peri-operative planning and optimization of the patient are imperative to ensure favourable outcomes and reduced morbidity. This Topical Review provides practice recommendations applicable in the peri-operative period in IBD patients undergoing surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The USA is emerging as the second epicentre of the 2022 monkeypox outbreak,[1],[2] in addition to Europe. The efficacy of currently available smallpox vaccines against monkeypox was estimated as 85% for both routine vaccination and ring vaccination.[6] The incorporated parameters and datasets were taken from authentic sources (Supplementary Table S1, supplementary data are available at I JTM i online). [Extracted from the article]

Aims Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody that selectively targets p40, a shared subunit of the cytokines interleukin [IL]-12 and IL-23. It is registered for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. We assessed the 2-year effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in a real world, prospective cohort of patients with Crohn's disease [CD]. Methods Patients who started ustekinumab were prospectively enrolled in the nationwide Initiative on Crohn and Colitis [ICC] Registry. At weeks 0, 12, 24, 52 and 104, clinical remission Harvey Bradshaw Index≤ 4 points], biochemical remission (faecal calprotectin ≤ 200 μg/g and/or C-reactive protein ≤5 mg/L], perianal fistula remission, extra-intestinal manifestations, ustekinumab dosage and safety outcomes were determined. The primary outcome was corticosteroid-free clinical remission at week 104. Results In total, 252 CD patients with at least 2 years of follow-up were included. Of all included patients, the proportion of patients in corticosteroid-free clinical remission was 32.3% [81/251], 41.4% [104/251], 39% [97/249] and 34.0% [84/247] at weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104, respectively. In patients with combined clinical and biochemical disease activity at baseline [ n = 122], the corticosteroid-free clinical remission rates were 23.8% [29/122], 35.2% [43/122], 40.0% [48/120] and 32.8% [39/119] at weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104, respectively. The probability of remaining on ustekinumab treatment after 52 and 104 weeks in all patients was 64.3% and 54.8%, respectively. The main reason for discontinuing treatment after 52 weeks was loss of response [66.7%]. No new safety issues were observed. Conclusion After 104 weeks of ustekinumab treatment, one-third of CD patients were in corticosteroid-free clinical remission. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Endorectal advancement flap repair is often performed for the treatment of cryptoglandular transsphincteric fistulas. However, this procedure fails in approximately 1 of 4 patients. Based on its supposed healing properties, platelet-rich plasma might enhance the outcome of this procedure., Objective: To evaluate and compare the short-term and long-term outcomes after endorectal advancement flap repair with and without platelet-rich plasma injection in patients with a cryptoglandular transsphincteric fistula., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Setting: Tertiary referral hospital for proctology in the Netherlands., Patients: Consecutive patients with a cryptoglandular transsphincteric fistula. Inverse propensity score-weighted comparison was used to adjust for confounding and selection bias., Interventions: Endorectal advancement flap repair with and without platelet-rich plasma injection., Main Outcome Measures: Clinical fistula closure within 1 year without need for a reintervention (primary healing), clinical fistula closure within 1 year corrected for reinterventions (secondary healing), overall fistula healing within 1 year, and long-term outcomes assessed by a questionnaire., Results: In total, 219 patients underwent an endorectal advancement flap repair. In 88 patients (40.2%), platelet-rich plasma was injected. No significant difference was observed in primary healing (67.0% vs 69.5%, p = 0.71), secondary healing (37.5% vs 43.5%, p = 0.60), or overall healing (73.9% vs 77.1%, p = 0.58) between patients treated with and without platelet-rich plasma injection. Long-term follow-up was available in 67.1% of the patients with a mean follow-up of 6.8 years (SD: 3.7 years). Among all patients who reached fistula healing, whether primary or secondary, within 1 year and had available long-term follow-up data, recurrence rates were also not significantly different (6.3% vs 2.9%, p = 0.37). Propensity score-weighted analysis showed that patients treated with a platelet-rich plasma injection were not more likely to achieve primary healing (OR 1.0; 95% CI, 0.5-1.9), secondary healing (OR 1.1; 95% CI, 0.2-3.2), overall healing (OR 0.9; 95% CI, 0.5-1.7), or recurrence at long-term follow-up (OR 1.1; 95% CI, 0.4-18.8) compared with patients without platelet-rich plasma injection., Limitations: Retrospective design, lack of postoperative imaging, and assessment of long-term follow-up using a questionnaire., Conclusion: Addition of platelet-rich plasma injection does not improve the short-term and long-term outcomes of endorectal advancement flap repair in patients with a cryptoglandular transsphincteric fistula treated in a tertiary referral center. See Video Abstract ., Adicin De Plasma Rico En Plaquetas a La Reparacin Del Colgajo De Avance Endorrectal No Mejora La Curacin De Las Fstulas Transesfinterianas Criptoglandulares: ANTECEDENTES:La reparación con colgajo de avance endorrectal a menudo se realiza para el tratamiento de fístulas transesfinterianas criptoglandulares. Sin embargo, este procedimiento falla en aproximadamente uno de cada cuatro pacientes. Basándose en sus supuestas propiedades curativas, el plasma rico en plaquetas (PRP) podría mejorar el resultado de este procedimiento.OBJETIVO:Evaluar y comparar los resultados a corto y largo plazo después de la reparación con colgajo de avance endorrectal con y sin inyección de PRP en pacientes con una fístula transesfintérica criptoglandular.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.ÁMBITO:Hospital terciario de referencia para proctología en los Países Bajos.PACIENTES:Pacientes consecutivos con fístula transesfintérica criptoglandular. Se utilizó una comparación ponderada por puntuación de propensión inversa para ajustar los factores de confusión y el sesgo de selección.INTERVENCIONES:Reparación del colgajo de avance endorrectal con y sin inyección de PRP.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:Cierre clínico de la fístula dentro de un año sin necesidad de reintervención (cicatrización primaria), cierre clínico de la fístula dentro de un año corregido por reintervenciones (cicatrización secundaria), curación general de la fístula dentro de un año y resultados a largo plazo evaluados mediante un cuestionario.RESULTADOS:En total, 219 pacientes se sometieron a una reparación con colgajo de avance endorrectal. En 88 pacientes (40,2%) se inyectó PRP. No se observaron diferencias significativas en la curación primaria (67,0% frente a 69,5%, p = 0,71), curación secundaria (37,5% frente a 43,5%, p = 0,60) y curación general (73,9% frente a 77,1%, p = 0,58).) entre pacientes con y sin inyección de PRP, respectivamente. El seguimiento a largo plazo estuvo disponible en el 67,1% de los pacientes con un seguimiento medio de 6,8 años (desviación estándar: 3,7 años). Dentro de todos los pacientes que alcanzaron la curación de la fístula, tanto primaria como secundaria, dentro de un año y tenían datos de seguimiento a largo plazo disponibles, las tasas de recurrencia tampoco fueron significativamente diferentes (6,3% vs. 2,9%, p = 0,37). El análisis ponderado por puntuación de propensión mostró que los pacientes tratados con una inyección de PRP no tenían más probabilidades de lograr la curación primaria (odds ratio [OR] 1,0; intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95 %: 0,5 - 1,9), curación secundaria (OR 1,1; IC del 95 % 0,2 - 3,2), curación general (OR 0,9; IC 95 % 0,5 - 1,7) o recurrencia en el seguimiento a largo plazo (OR 1,1; IC 95 % 0,4 - 18,8) en comparación con pacientes sin inyección de PRP.LIMITACIONES:Diseño retrospectivo, falta de imágenes postoperatorias y evaluación del seguimiento a largo plazo mediante un cuestionario.CONCLUSIÓN:La adición de la inyección de PRP no mejora el resultado a corto y largo plazo de la reparación con colgajo de avance endorrectal en pacientes con una fístula transesfintérica criptoglandular tratados en un centro de referencia terciario. (Traducción- Dr. Ingrid Melo )., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons.)