Search

Anton Pottegård,1 Kasper Bruun Kristensen,1 Mette Reilev,1 Lars Christian Lund,1 Martin Thomsen Ernst,1 Jesper Hallas,1,2 Reimar Wernich Thomsen,3 Christian Fynbo Christiansen,3 Henrik Toft Sørensen,3,4 Nanna Borup Johansen,5 Henrik Støvring,1,6 Steffen Christensen,7 Marianne Kragh Thomsen,8 Anders Husby,9 Marianne Voldstedlund,10 Jesper Kjær,11 Nikolai C Brun5 1Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; 2Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; 3Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; 4Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; 5Department of Medical Evaluation and Biostatistics, Danish Medicines Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark; 6Department of Public Health – Biostatistics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; 7Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; 8Department of Clinical Microbiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; 9Department of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark; 10Infection Preparedness, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark; 11Data Analytics Center, Danish Medicines Agency, Copenhagen, DenmarkCorrespondence: Anton PottegårdClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, JB Winsløws Vej 19, 2, Odense DK-5000, DenmarkTel +45 28913340Email apottegaard@health.sdu.dkBackground: To facilitate research on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a prospective cohort of all Danish residents tested for SARS-CoV-2 in Denmark is established.Data Structure: All Danish residents tested by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reactions (RT-PCR) for SARS-CoV-2 in Denmark are included. The cohort is identified using the Danish Microbiology Database. Individual-level record linkage between administrative and health-care registries is facilitated by the Danish Civil Registration System. Information on outcomes related to SARS-CoV-2 infection includes hospital admission, intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, and death and is retrieved from the five administrative Danish regions, the Danish National Patient Registry, and the Danish Register of Causes of Death. The Patient Registry further provides a complete hospital contact history of somatic and psychiatric conditions and procedures. Data on all prescriptions filled at community pharmacies are available from the Danish National Prescription Registry. Health-care authorization status is obtained from the Danish Register of Healthcare Professionals. Finally, selected laboratory values are obtained from the Register of Laboratory Results for Research. The cohort is governed by a steering committee with representatives from the Danish Medicines Agency, Statens Serum Institut, the Danish Health Authority, the Danish Health Data Authority, Danish Patients, the Faculties of Health Sciences at the Danish universities, and Danish regions. The steering committee welcomes suggestions for research studies and collaborations. Research proposals will be prioritized based on timeliness and potential clinical and public health implications. All research protocols assessing specific hypotheses for medicines will be made publicly available using the European Union electronic Register of Post-Authorisation Studies.Conclusion: The Danish COVID-19 cohort includes all Danish residents with an RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2. Through individual-level linkage with existing Danish health and administrative registries, this is a valuable data source for epidemiological research on SARS-CoV-2.Keywords: Covid-19, SARS-CoV-2, epidemiology, follow-up, database, prognosis, prospective cohort

We have quantitated and studied the topology of isoforms of the Na+/K(+)-ATPase and of the glucose transporter in rat adipocyte plasma membranes. Adipocytes were incubated with or without insulin for 15 min. Sheets of native plasma membrane, with the cytoplasmic face exposed, were prepared by adsorption to EM grids. Grids were incubated in parallel with monoclonal antibodies against the Na+/K(+)-ATPase isoforms alpha 1 and alpha 2, and the glucose transporter isoforms GLUT1 and GLUT4, followed by immunogold labeling, negative staining and quantitation by counting of the gold particles in electron micrographs. In addition, the distribution of glucose transporters and Na+/K(+)-ATPase isoforms in subcellular membrane fractions prepared by an established fractionation procedure was monitored by Western blotting. We found that the Na+/K(+)-ATPases and the glucose transporters were confined to the planar part of the plasma membrane, without association to caveolar invaginations. The vast majority of the Na+/K(+)-ATPase molecules in the adipocyte plasma membrane were of the alpha 2 isoform; GLUT4 was the dominating glucose transporter isoform. The total number of Na+/K(+)-ATPase molecules labeled in the plasma membrane was 3.5 x 10(5) per cell, independent of insulin stimulation. Concomitantly, insulin increased GLUT4 labeling sevenfold to a value of 3.5 x 10(5) per cell. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The emergence of bloodstream infections (BSI) caused by vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) has caused concern. Nonetheless, it remains unclear whether these types are associated with an excess risk of severe outcomes when compared with infections caused by vancomycin-susceptible Enterococci (VSE). This cohort study included hospitalized patients in Denmark with Enterococcus faecium -positive blood cultures collected between 2010 and 2019 identified in the Danish Microbiology Database. We estimated 30-day hazard ratio (HR) of death or discharge among VRE compared to VSE patients adjusted for age, sex, and comorbidity. The cohort included 6071 patients with E. faecium BSI (335 VRE, 5736 VSE) among whom VRE increased (2010-13, 2.6%; 2014-16, 6.3%; 2017-19; 9.4%). Mortality (HR 1.08, 95%CI 0.90-1.29; 126 VRE, 37.6%; 2223 VSE, 37.0%) or discharge (HR 0.89, 95%CI 0.75-1.06; 126 VRE, 37.6%; 2386 VSE, 41.6%) was not different between VRE and VSE except in 2014 (HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.18-2.96). There was no interaction between time from admission to BSI (1-2, 3-14, and >14 days) and HR of death ( P  = 0.14) or discharge ( P  = 0.45) after VRE compared to VSE, despite longer time for VRE patients (17 vs. 10 days for VSE, P  < 0.0001). In conclusion, VRE BSI was not associated with excess morbidity and mortality. The excess mortality in 2014 only may be attributed to improved diagnostic- and patient-management practices after 2014, reducing time to appropriate antibiotic therapy. The high level of mortality after E. faecium BSI warrants further study.

Purpose: Surgery is required in 20-50% of patients with infective endocarditis (IE). Frailty increases surgical risk; however, the prognostic implications of frailty in patients undergoing IE-related surgery remain poorly understood. We aimed to assess the association between frailty and all-cause mortality or rehospitalization after discharge (≥ 14 days)., Methods: We identified all IE patients who underwent surgery during admission (2010-2020) in Denmark. The Hospital Frailty Risk Score was used to categorize patients into two frailty risk groups, patients with low frailty scores (< 5 points) and frail patients (≥ 5 points). We analyzed time hospitalized after discharge and all-cause mortality from the date of surgery with a one-year follow-up. Statistical analyses utilized the Kaplan-Meier estimator, Aalen-Johansen estimator, and the Cox regression model., Results: We identified 1282 patients who underwent surgery during admission, of whom 967 (75.4%) had low frailty scores, and 315 (24.6%) were frail. Frail patients were characterized by advanced age, a lower proportion of males, and a higher burden of comorbidities. Frail patients were more hospitalized (> 14 days) in the first post-discharge year (19.1% vs.12.3%) compared to patients with low frailty scores. Additionally, frail patients had higher rates of all-cause mortality including in-hospital deaths (27% vs. 15%) and rehospitalizations (43.5% vs 26.1%) compared to patients with low frailty scores. This was also evident in the adjusted analysis (hazard ratio 1.36 [CI 95% 1.09-1.71])., Conclusion: Frailty was associated with an ≈40% increased rate of rehospitalization (≥ 14 days) or death. Further studies are needed to assess the effectiveness of surgery with a focus on frailty to improve prognostic outcomes in these patients., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background and Aims: In patients undergoing heart valve surgery, subsequent bacteremia and infective endocarditis are feared events. Data on the incidence and bacterial microbiological etiology following left-sided heart valve surgery are sparse., Methods: Between 2010-2021, all patients undergoing left-sided valve surgery were identified using Danish nationwide registries. Incidence and type bacteremia within one-year post-surgery was analyzed. Secondary outcome of interest was infective endocarditis. Cumulative incidence curves were stratified for bacterial species and for subgroups of interest: type of valve surgery, age, and sex., Results: A total of 14 935 patients were included, of which 69% were male and the median age was 70.4 years (25th-75th percentile 62.4-76.2 years). The one-year cumulative incidence of bacteremia was 6.1% (95% CI 5.7-6.5%), and the most frequent bacteremia was coagulase-negative staphylococci (27%). More than half of the bacteremia with coagulase-negative staphylococci occurred within 30 days of follow-up. Patients developing bacteremia had a significantly higher Charlson comorbidity score at baseline, more often underwent CABG concomitant to valve surgery, and more often had surgery on both valves. The one-year cumulative incidence of infective endocarditis was 1.5% (95% CI 1.3-1.7), of which 23% were caused by Enterococci, and 22% were blood culture negative. The median time from surgery to infective endocarditis was 109 days., Conclusions: Bacteremia and infective endocarditis following left-sided heart valve surgery occurred in 6.1% and 1.5% of patients, respectively. The most frequent bacteremia was coagulase-negative staphylococci, and more than half of these occurred within 30 days of surgery. Optimization of prophylactic strategies are warranted., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Purpose: Sex differences in infective endocarditis (IE) are reported, but patient characteristics are sparse and conflicting findings on the association between sex and short-term outcomes demand further research. We aimed to characterize sex differences in IE in terms of patient characteristics, frailty, microbiology, socioeconomic status, management and outcome on a nationwide scale., Methods: Between 2010 and 2020, we used Danish national registries to characterize patients with IE according to sex using ICD codes and microbiological lab reports. Frailty was assessed with the Hospital Frailty Risk Score. Mortality was reported with Kaplan-Meier estimates. Logistic regression and Cox regression were used for adjusted analyses., Results: We included 6259 patients with IE with 2047 (32.7%) female patients and 4212 (67.3%) male patients. Female patients were older (median age 75.0 years (64.3-82.2) vs. 71.7 (61.7-78.9)) and more frail (Intermediate frailty: 36.5% vs. 33.1%, High frailty: 11.4% vs. 9.2%). Staphylococcus aureus-IE were most common in both sexes (34.6% vs. 28.8%), but fewer female patients had Enterococcus-IE (10.5% vs. 18.1%). Female patients were less surgically treated (14.0% vs. 21.2%). Female sex was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (adj. OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.16-1.52), but no statistically significant difference in associated 1- and 5-year mortality from hospital discharge were identified (adj. HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.95-1.24 and 1.02, 95% CI 0.92-1.12, respectively)., Conclusion: Female sex is associated with increased in-hospital mortality, but not in long-term mortality as compared with male patients. Female patients have a lower prevalence of Enterococcus-IE and rates of surgery. Further research is needed to understand these differences., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.)

Background: Infective endocarditis (IE) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is associated with high mortality and surgery is rarely performed. Thus, to inform on preventive measures and treatment strategies, we investigated patient characteristics and microbiology of IE after TAVI., Methods: Using Danish nationwide registries, we identified patients with IE after TAVI, IE after non-TAVI prosthetic valve (nTPV), and native valve IE. Patient characteristics; overall, early (≤12 m), and late IE (>12 m) microbiology; and unadjusted and adjusted mortality were compared., Results: We identified 273, 1022, and 5376 cases of IE after TAVI, IE after nTPV, and native valve IE. Age and frailty were highest among TAVI IE (4.8%; median age: 82 y; 61.9% frail). Enterococcus spp. were common for IE after TAVI (27.1%) and IE after nTPV (21.2%) compared with native valve IE (11.4%). Blood culture-negative IE was rare in IE after TAVI (5.5%) compared with IE after nTPV (15.2%) and native valve IE (13.5%). The unadjusted 90-day mortality was comparable, but the 5-year mortality was highest for IE after TAVI (75.2% vs 57.2% vs 53.6%). In Cox models adjusted for patient characteristics and bacterial etiology for 1-90 days and 91-365 days, there was no significant difference in mortality rates., Conclusions: Patients with IE after TAVI are older and frailer, enterococci and streptococci are often the etiologic agents, and are rarely blood culture negative compared with other IE patients. Future studies regarding antibiotic prophylaxis strategies covering enterococci should be considered in this setting., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. L. K.: Lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer, Novartis, and Novo. H. B.: Lecture fees from Amgen, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Sanofi. M. V.: Lecture fees from MyLab Oy. J. B. O.: Speaker’s honoraria or consultancy fees from Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Pfizer. E. L. F.: Independent research grant from Novo Nordisk Foundation. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)