Search

Current assays fail to address breast cancer's complex biology and accurately predict treatment response. On a retrospective cohort of 1082 female breast tissues, we develop and validate mFISHseq, which integrates multiplexed RNA fluorescent in situ hybridization with RNA-sequencing, guided by laser capture microdissection. This technique ensures tumor purity, unbiased whole transcriptome profiling, and explicitly quantifies intratumoral heterogeneity. Here we show mFISHseq has 93% accuracy compared to immunohistochemistry. Our consensus subtyping and risk groups mitigate single sample discordance, provide early and late prognostic information, and identify high risk patients with enriched immune signatures, which predict response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in the multicenter, phase II, prospective I-SPY2 trial. We identify putative antibody-drug conjugate (ADC)-responsive patients, as evidenced by a 19-feature T-DM1 classifier, validated on I-SPY2. Deploying mFISHseq as a research-use only test on 48 patients demonstrates clinical feasibility, revealing insights into the efficacy of targeted therapies, like CDK4/6 inhibitors, immunotherapies, and ADCs., Competing Interests: Competing interests: E.D.P., B.H., N.Val., N.M., D.G., S.G., H.I., T.O., M.G., L.B., S.B., J.B., K.B., D.D., Z.K., M.K., D.L., V.Mam., V.Man., N.Voj., M.R. and P.Č. are current, or former employees of MultiplexDX, a biotechnology company that is developing a lab developed diagnostic test called Multiplex8+ ( https://www.multiplexdx.com/products/multiplex-eight-plus ), which is based on the research presented in the manuscript. P.Č. and E.D.P. are inventors and MultiplexDX, s.r.o is the assignee on patent applications that were filed in relation to the technology and research outlined in the manuscript. These include a family of patents entitled “METHOD FOR DIAGNOSING DISEASES USING MULTIPLEX FLUORESCENCE AND SEQUENCING” (WO/2020/070325, EP3775277, CA3114689, AU2019354863, SG11202103466T, KR1020210071003, CN113366118, BR112021006454, US20230037279, JP2022513333, IL282067, and NZ774986) as well as submitted EPO and PCT patents that are not published. T.T., F.P., and J.N.K. are members of the Scientific Advisory board at MultiplexDX. F.P. reports consulting services and serving on the advisory board for AstraZeneca. J.N.K. declares consulting services for Owkin, France, DoMore Diagnostics, Norway, Panakeia, UK, Scailyte, Switzerland, Cancilico, Germany, Mindpeak, Germany, and Histofy, UK; furthermore, he holds shares in StratifAI GmbH, Germany, has received a research grant by GSK, and has received honoraria by AstraZeneca, Bayer, Eisai, Janssen, MSD, BMS, Roche, Pfizer and Fresenius. All other authors declare no competing interests. Ethics & Inclusions: This study complies with all relevant ethical regulations for human research participants in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The collection and use of human tissue in the retrospective clinical validation study on 1082 patients and the RUO testing cohort of 48 patients were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Bratislava Self-Governing Region (Ref. No. 05320/2020/HF). Additionally, the retrospective cohort received approval from the Ethics Commission of the Medical University of Graz on behalf of Biobank Graz (No. 34-354 ex 21/21, 1158−2022). Informed consent was obtained for tissues in the retrospective study from tissue sources including biobanks (PATH Biobank and Biobank Graz), a hospital (Malaga), and commercial companies (AMSBio and Precision for Medicine). For the RUO cohort, all 48 patients signed informed consent forms, with their oncologists approving them prior to tissue processing. The RUO testing occurred through routine testing with collaborating hospitals in Slovakia and included consultations and participation of local oncologists and researchers for patient selection, collecting clinicopathological data, obtaining informed consent, and explaining results. No discrimination occurred in the selection of patients for RUO testing and both clinical partners and MultiplexDX ensured sensitive patient information was anonymized when appropriate and secured both physically and electronically. A local pathologist (Dr. Karol Kajo) was also consulted with in both the retrospective and RUO cohorts to identify invasive breast cancer or unique histology in more challenging cases., (© 2025. The Author(s).)

Sensitive and rapid point-of-care assays have been crucial in the global response to SARS-CoV-2. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) has emerged as an important diagnostic tool given its simplicity and minimal equipment requirements, although limitations exist regarding sensitivity and the methods used to detect reaction products. We describe the development of Vivid COVID-19 LAMP, which leverages a metallochromic detection system utilizing zinc ions and a zinc sensor, 5-Br-PAPS, to circumvent the limitations of classic detection systems dependent on pH indicators or magnesium chelators. We make important strides in improving RT-LAMP sensitivity by establishing principles for using LNA-modified LAMP primers, multiplexing, and conducting extensive optimizations of reaction parameters. To enable point-of-care testing, we introduce a rapid sample inactivation procedure without RNA extraction that is compatible with self-collected, non-invasive gargle samples. Our quadruplexed assay (targeting E, N, ORF1a, and RdRP) reliably detects 1 RNA copy/µl of sample (=8 copies/reaction) from extracted RNA and 2 RNA copies/µl of sample (=16 copies/reaction) directly from gargle samples, making it one of the most sensitive RT-LAMP tests and even comparable to RT-qPCR. Additionally, we demonstrate a self-contained, mobile version of our assay in a variety of high-throughput field testing scenarios on nearly 9,000 crude gargle samples. Vivid COVID-19 LAMP can be an important asset for the endemic phase of COVID-19 as well as preparing for future pandemics., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Sensitive and accurate RT-qPCR tests are the primary diagnostic tools to identify SARS-CoV-2-infected patients. While many SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR tests are available, there are significant differences in test sensitivity, workflow (e.g. hands-on-time), gene targets and other functionalities that users must consider. Several publicly available protocols shared by reference labs and public health authorities provide useful tools for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, but many have shortcomings related to sensitivity and laborious workflows. Here, we describe a series of SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR tests that are originally based on the protocol targeting regions of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and envelope (E) coding genes developed by the Charité Berlin. We redesigned the primers/probes, utilized locked nucleic acid nucleotides, incorporated dual probe technology and conducted extensive optimizations of reaction conditions to enhance the sensitivity and specificity of these tests. By incorporating an RNase P internal control and developing multiplexed assays for distinguishing SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A and B, we streamlined the workflow to provide quicker results and reduced consumable costs. Some of these tests use modified enzymes enabling the formulation of a room temperature-stable master mix and lyophilized positive control, thus increasing the functionality of the test and eliminating cold chain shipping and storage. Moreover, a rapid, RNA extraction-free version enables high sensitivity detection of SARS-CoV-2 in about an hour using minimally invasive, self-collected gargle samples. These RT-qPCR assays can easily be implemented in any diagnostic laboratory and can provide a powerful tool to detect SARS-CoV-2 and the most common seasonal influenzas during the vaccination phase of the pandemic., (© 2022 Multiplex DX, S.R.O. Microbial Biotechnology published by Society for Applied Microbiology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)