Search

Since the inception of critical care medicine and artificial ventilation, literature and research on weaning has transformed daily patient care in intensive care units (ICU). As our knowledge of mechanical ventilation (MV) improved, so did the need to study patient-ventilator interactions and weaning predictors. Randomized trials have evaluated the use of protocol-based weaning (vs. usual care) to study the duration of MV in ICUs, different techniques to conduct spontaneous breathing trials (SBT), and strategies to eventually extubate a patient whose initial SBT failed. Despite considerable milestones in the management of multiple diseases contributing to reversible respiratory failure, in the application of early rehabilitative interventions to preserve muscle integrity, and in ventilator technology that mitigates against ventilator injury and dyssynchrony, major barriers to successful liberation from MV persist. This review provides a broad encompassing view of weaning classification, causes of weaning failure, and evidence behind weaning predictors and weaning modes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the frequency, characteristics, and outcomes of ethics consultations in critically ill patients with cancer. Design, Setting, and Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of all adult patients with cancer who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of a comprehensive cancer center and had an ethics consultation between September 2007 and December 2011. Demographic and clinical variables were abstracted along with the details and contexts of the ethics consultations. Main Results: Ethics consultations were obtained on 53 patients (representing 1% of all ICU admissions). The majority (90%) of patients had advanced-stage malignancies, had received oncologic therapies within the past 12 months, and required mechanical ventilation and/or vasopressor therapy for respiratory failure and/or severe sepsis. Two-thirds of the patients lacked decision-making capacity and nearly all had surrogates. The most common reasons for ethics consultations were disagreements between the patients/surrogates and the ICU team regarding end-of-life care. After ethics consultations, the surrogates agreed with the recommendations made by the ICU team on the goals of care in 85% of patients. Moreover, ethics consultations facilitated the provision of palliative medicine and chaplaincy services to several patients who did not have these services offered to them prior to the ethics consultations. Conclusion: Our study showed that ethics consultations were helpful in resolving seemingly irreconcilable differences between the ICU team and the patients’ surrogates in the majority of cases. Additionally, these consultations identified the need for an increased provision of palliative care and chaplaincy visits for patients and their surrogates at the end of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship of intrahospital transport patterns with patient throughput and outcomes in an oncological intensive care unit. We retrospectively reviewed all patients admitted to a closed medical-surgical intensive care unit at a cancer center between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2005. We compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with and without transport and analyzed all intrahospital transports in relation to intensive care unit occupancy, length of stay, and intensive care unit and hospital outcomes. Transport patterns were also assessed by day of week, time of day, timing of the first transport to intensive care unit admission, and destination. Transported patients (n = 413, 43.5%) had significantly higher severity of illness scores on intensive care unit admission, greater use of vasopressors and mechanical ventilation, and longer intensive care unit and hospital length of stay and higher hospital mortality than nontransported patients (n = 535, 56.5%). Multiple transports (-2) occurred in 45% of the transported patients. The number of transports was directly proportional to intensive care unit length of stay. The highest transport rates and nearly half of all first transports occurred during the first 24 hours of intensive care unit admission. Transports were most common during weekdays and on afternoon and evening hours and most frequently to the computed tomography suite. Our study shows that intrahospital transport of the critically ill is a multifaceted process with important implications for intensive care unit resource analysis, workload and throughput. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In a healthcare setting, a multitude of ethical and moral challenges are often present when patients and families direct uncivil behavior toward clinicians and staff. These negative interactions may elicit strong social and emotional reactions among staff, other patients, and visitors; and they may impede the normal functioning of an institution. Ethics Committees and Clinical Ethics Consultation Services (CECSs) can meaningfully contribute to organizational efforts to effectively manage incivility through two distinct, yet inter-related channels. First, given their responsibility to promote a humane, respectful, and professional climate, many CECSs and Ethics Committees may assist institutional leadership in evaluating and monitoring incivility policies and procedures. Second, when confronted with individual incidents of patient/family incivility, Ethics Consultants can and often do work with all stakeholders to address and mitigate potentially deleterious impacts. This manuscript presents an overview of the multifaceted ethical implications of incivility in the healthcare environment, discusses the inherent qualifications of Ethics Consultants for assisting in the management of incivility, and proposes specific mitigating actions within the purview of CECSs and Ethics Committees. We also invite healthcare organizations to harness the skills and reputation of their CECSs and Ethics Committees in confronting incivility through comprehensive policies, procedures, and training. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has strained healthcare systems by creating a tragic imbalance between needs and resources. Governments and healthcare organizations have adapted to this pronounced scarcity by applying allocation guidelines to facilitate life-or-death decision-making, reduce bias, and save as many lives as possible. However, we argue that in societies beset by longstanding inequities, these approaches fall short as mortality patterns for historically discriminated against communities have been disturbingly higher than in the general population. Methods: We review attack and fatality rates; survey allocation protocols designed to deal with the extreme scarcity characteristic of the earliest phases of the pandemic; and highlight the larger ethical perspectives (Utilitarianism, non-Utilitarian Rawlsian justice) that might justify such allocation practices. Results: The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically amplified the dire effects of disparities with respect to the social determinants of health. Patients in historically marginalized groups not only have significantly poorer health prospects but also lower prospects of accessing high quality medical care and benefitting from it even when available. Thus, mortality among minority groups has ranged from 1.9 to 2.4 times greater than the rest of the population. Standard allocation schemas, that prioritize those most likely to benefit, perpetuate and may even exacerbate preexisting systemic injustices. Conclusions: To be better prepared for the inevitable next pandemic, we must urgently begin the monumental project of addressing and reforming the structural inequities in US society that account for the strikingly disparate mortality rates we have witnessed over the course of the current pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Management of patients with brain tumors can lead to ethical and decisional dilemmas. The aim of this study was to characterize ethical conflicts encountered in neuro-oncologic patients. Methods Retrospective review of ethics consultations performed upon patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors at a tertiary cancer center. An ethics consultation database was examined to characterize ethical conflicts, contextual factors, and interventions by the consultation team. Results Fifty consultations were reviewed; 28 (56%) patients were women, median age 54 (range 4-86); 27 (54%) patients had a primary central nervous system malignancy; 20 (40%) had brain metastasis. At the time of consultations, 41 (82%) patients lacked decisional capacity; 48 (96%) had a designated surrogate decision maker; 3 (6%) had an advance directive outlining wishes regarding medical treatment; 12 (24%) had a Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) order. Ethical conflicts centered upon management of end-of-life (EOL) circumstances in 37 (72%) of cases; of these, 30 did not have decisional capacity. The most common ethical issues were DNAR status, surrogate decision making, and request for nonbeneficial treatment. Consultants resolved conflicts by facilitating decision making for incapacitated patients in 30 (60%) cases, communication between conflicting parties in 10 (20%), and re-articulation of patients' previously stated wishes in 6 (12%). Conclusions Decisional capacity at EOL represents the primary ethical challenge in care of neuro-oncologic patients. Incomplete awareness among surrogate decision makers of patients' prognosis and preferences contributes to communication gaps and dilemmas. Early facilitation of communication between patients, caregivers, and medical providers may prevent or mitigate conflicts and allow the enactment of patients' goals and values. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

All medical care providers are legally and ethically bound to respect their patients' wishes. However, as patients lose decision-making capacity and approach end of life, their families or surrogates, who are confronted with grief, fear, self-doubt, and/or uncertainty, may ask physicians to provide treatment that contradicts the patients' previously stated wishes. Our work discusses the legal and ethical issues surrounding such requests and provides guidance for clinicians to ethically and compassionately respond-without compromising their professional and moral obligations to their patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Data on the outcomes of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions for patients with advanced incurable chemoresistant solid tumor malignancies, and the benefits of subsequent/post-ICU anticancer treatments are limited but have end-of-life and ethical implications. Methods: An institutional database was queried to identify patients of the gastrointestinal (GI) medical oncology service of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center with ≥1 ICU admission during 2014. Records were reviewed for evidence of cancer control from cancer treatment after the ICU admission. Results: Twenty-eight patients who had progressed beyond at least first-line chemotherapy for metastatic GI adenocarcinoma were admitted to the ICU for sequelae of progressive clinical deterioration. The most frequent reasons for ICU admission were sepsis (39%) and acute respiratory failure (29%). Ten patients died in the ICU, 3 died during the same hospitalization after ICU discharge, and 15 were discharged from the hospital. Of these 15, the median survival from hospital discharge was 2.2 months and 6 received further chemotherapy but with no evidence of clinical benefit. Of these 6, 3 lived over 5 months but the treatment of 5 entailed recycling of previously ineffective chemotherapy agents (3) or those originally used in the adjuvant setting (2). Two of these patients received liver-directed therapy without benefit. Conclusions: Admissions to the ICU in this cancer population were associated with high morbidity and mortality and did not result in benefit from subsequent cancer treatment. These data can be used to help establish realistic expectations and care goals in previously treated patients having metastatic GI cancer with clinical deterioration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To determine the level of recall, satisfaction, and perceived benefits of early mobility (EM) among ventilated cancer patients after extubation in the intensive care unit (ICU).Methods: A survey of patients' perceptions and recollections of EM was administered within 72 h of extubation. Data on recall of EM participation, activities achieved, adequacy of staffing and rest periods, strength to participate, activity level of difficulty, satisfaction with staff instructions, breathing management, and overall rating of the experience were analyzed. The Confusion Assessment Method for ICU (CAM-ICU) was used for delirium screening.Results: Fifty-four patients comprised the study group. Nearly 90% reported satisfaction with instructions, staffing, rest periods, and breathing management during EM. Participants indicated that EM maintained their strength (67%) and gave them control over their recovery (61%); a minority felt optimistic (37%) and safe (22%). Patients who achieved more sessions and "out-of-bed" exercises had better recall of actual activities compared with those who exercised in bed. Overall, patients with CAM-ICU-positive results (33%) performed less physical and occupational therapy exercises.Conclusions: Ventilated cancer patients reported an overall positive EM experience, but factual memory impairment of EM activities was common. These findings highlight the needs and the importance of shaping strategies to deliver a more patient focused EM experience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report a laboratory-confirmed case of adult intestinal toxemia botulism in an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) recipient. Onset of symptoms occurred within the hospitalized setting, making this case particularly unique. Botulism may have arisen because of significant intestinal disruption and compromise, and not directly from immune compromise. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article offers information about evidence-based principles of palliative care, a core component of comprehensive care for patients facing critical illness, regardless of age, diagnosis, or prognosis, aiming to support optimal critical care practice. It also discusses domains of intensive care unit (ICU) palliative care such as relief of distressing symptoms, effective communication about care goals, patient-focused decision-making, and caregiver support.

Background: Respiratory signs and symptoms are commonly encountered by physicians who care for cancer patients. Supplemental oxygen (SOx) has long been used for treatment of hypoxic respiratory insufficiency, but data reveal mixed efficacy results. The use and outcome patterns of technologically advanced oxygen delivery devices, such as humidified high-flow nasal oxygen (HHFNOx), are incompletely understood. Methods: Institutional database search of the number of patient cases in which the current HHFNOx device was used, and abstraction of 183 patient medical records for usage characteristics. Results: Patients have been treated with HHFNOx at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) since 2008. Of the 183 patients randomly selected for our study, 72% received HHFNOx in the intensive care unit (ICU) because of hypoxia. Patients usually improved (41%) or remained stable (44%) while on the device, whereas 15% declined. At study completion, 45% of patients were living, and 55% had died. The median time on HHFNOx was 3 days (range: 1-27). A do not resuscitate (DNR) order was present in 101 (55%) patients, either before (12%) or after (43%) device utilization. The majority (78%) of these 101 patients died at MSKCC. Conclusion: Dyspnea is a common and important symptom in cancer patients for which SOx traditionally has had no clear basis except in select cases of hypoxia and patient preference. Our institutional experience with HHFNOx contributes to the understanding of the applications and challenges surrounding the use of new medical devices in the cancer population. Physiologic and quality-of-life benefits of HHFNOx compared with traditional oxygen delivery methods should be studied prospectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a study which investigates unexpected intensive care unit (ICU) admissions after actual or planned hospital discharge at a tertiary care cancer center in the U.S. Researchers retrospectively reviewed all ICU admissions from January 2004 to December 2006 and assessed the incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcome of ICU patients. It concludes that majority of ICU admissions after actual or planned hospital discharge is due to the worsening of the underlying condition.