Search

Background and purposeThe SOFT trial is a prospective, multicenter, phase 2 trial investigating magnetic resonance (MR)-guided stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for abdominal, soft tissue metastases in patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD) (clinicaltrials.govID NCT04407897). We present the primary endpoint analysis of 1-year treatment-related toxicity (TRAE).Materials and methodsPatients with up to five oligometastases from non-hematological cancers were eligible for inclusion. A risk-adapted strategy prioritized fixed organs at risk (OAR) constraints over target coverage. Fractionation schemes were 45–67.5 Gy in 3–8 fractions. The primary endpoint was grade ≥ 4 TRAE within 12 months post-SABR. The association between the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity and clinical and dosimetric parameters was tested using a normal tissue complication probability model.ResultsWe included 121 patients with 147 oligometastatic targets, mainly located in the liver (41 %), lymph nodes (35 %), or adrenal glands (14 %). Nearly half of all targets (48 %, n = 71) were within 10 mm of a radiosensitive OAR. No grade 4 or 5 TRAEs, 3.5 % grade 3 TRAEs, and 43.7 % grade 2 TRAEs were reported within the first year of follow-up. We found a significant association between grade ≥ 2 GI toxicity and the parameters GI OAR D0.1cc, D1cc, and D20cc.ConclusionIn this phase II study of MR-guided SABR of oligometastases in the infra-diaphragmatic region, we found a low incidence of toxicity despite half of the lesions being within 10 mm of a radiosensitive OAR. GI OAR D0.1cc, D1cc, and D20cc were associated with grade ≥ 2 GI toxicity., Background and purpose: The SOFT trial is a prospective, multicenter, phase 2 trial investigating magnetic resonance (MR)-guided stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for abdominal, soft tissue metastases in patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD) (clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT04407897). We present the primary endpoint analysis of 1-year treatment-related toxicity (TRAE). Materials and methods: Patients with up to five oligometastases from non-hematological cancers were eligible for inclusion. A risk-adapted strategy prioritized fixed organs at risk (OAR) constraints over target coverage. Fractionation schemes were 45–67.5 Gy in 3–8 fractions. The primary endpoint was grade ≥ 4 TRAE within 12 months post-SABR. The association between the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity and clinical and dosimetric parameters was tested using a normal tissue complication probability model. Results: We included 121 patients with 147 oligometastatic targets, mainly located in the liver (41 %), lymph nodes (35 %), or adrenal glands (14 %). Nearly half of all targets (48 %, n = 71) were within 10 mm of a radiosensitive OAR. No grade 4 or 5 TRAEs, 3.5 % grade 3 TRAEs, and 43.7 % grade 2 TRAEs were reported within the first year of follow-up. We found a significant association between grade ≥ 2 GI toxicity and the parameters GI OAR D0.1cc, D1cc, and D20cc. Conclusion: In this phase II study of MR-guided SABR of oligometastases in the infra-diaphragmatic region, we found a low incidence of toxicity despite half of the lesions being within 10 mm of a radiosensitive OAR. GI OAR D0.1cc, D1cc, and D20cc were associated with grade ≥ 2 GI toxicity.

Background and purpose Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of ultra-central lung tumors (UCLT) is associated with an increased risk of severe toxicity. The aim of this study was to perform a detailed dosimetric analysis of the proximal bronchial tree (PBT) anatomical sub-segments to evaluate the safety of risk-adapted SBRT and to evaluate potential differences in radiation tolerance between PBT sub-segments. Material and methods Fifty-seven patients treated with SBRT for UCLT between 2014 and 2021 were included. UCLT were defined as tumor abutting or overlapping with the trachea, PBT, or esophagus. This study analyzed overall survival, local control, progression-free survival, and grade ≥3 toxicity events. Bayesian inference was used to build a dose-response model with upper limits for toxicity. Results Twenty-seven (47.4%) of the irradiated lesions were primary or locoregionally recurrent NSCLC and 30 (52.6%) oligometastases. All patients were treated with risk-adapted SBRT of median 45.0 Gy (range: 30.0-60.0 Gy) in 8 or 10 fractions. Grade ≥3 radiation pneumonitis was observed in two patients (3.5%), while no bronchial stenosis, hemorrhage or fistula were observed. The dose-response model predicted a grade ≥3 toxicity (stenosis, hemorrhage or fistula) limited to 4.9% (0 - 11.4%) when delivering EQD2$\_$3 = 100 Gy to any location of the PBT (D0.2cc). Detailed dosimetric analysis of PBT substructures showed no variation in the dose-response model between the anatomical PBT sub-segments. Conclusion Risk-adapted SBRT regimens delivered in 8 or 10 fractions for ultra-central lung tumors resulted in high rates of local tumor control with low toxicity rates, without differences in radiation tolerance between the anatomical PBT sub-segments.

Background The randomized clinical trial ESO-SPARE investigates if oesophagus-sparing radiotherapy (RT) can reduce dysphagia in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). Patient-reported outcome (PRO) is the only follow-up measure. Due to the fragile patient population, low respondent compliance was anticipated. We performed a planned interim analysis of dosimetry and respondent compliance, to ensure that the protocol requirements were met. Methods Patients >18 years referred for cervical/thoracic MSCC radiotherapy in 1-10 fractions were included from two centres. Patients were randomized (1:1) to standard RT or oesophagus-sparing RT, where predefined oesophageal dose constraints were prioritized over target coverage. Patients completed a trial diary with daily reports of dysphagia for 5 weeks (PRO-CTC-AE) and weekly quality of life reports for 9 weeks (QLQ-C30, EQ-5D-5L). According to power calculation, 124 patients are needed for primary endpoint analysis. The sample size was inflated to 200 patients to account for the fragile patient population. The co-primary endpoints, peak patient-reported dysphagia, and preserved ability to walk (EQ-5D-5L), are analysed at 5 and 9 weeks, respectively. The interim analysis was conducted 90 days after the inclusion of patient no 100. Respondent compliance was assessed at 5 and 9 weeks. In all RT plans, oesophagus and target doses were evaluated regarding adherence to protocol constraints. Results From May 2021 to November 2022, 100 patients were included. Fifty-two were randomized to oesophagus-sparing RT. In 23% of these plans, oesophagus constraints were violated. Overall, the dose to both target and oesophagus was significantly lower in the oesophagus-sparing plans. Only 51% and 41% of the patients were evaluable for co-primary endpoint analysis at five and nine weeks, respectively. Mortality and hospitalization rates were significantly larger in patients who completed <4 da, BACKGROUND: The randomized clinical trial ESO-SPARE investigates if oesophagus-sparing radiotherapy (RT) can reduce dysphagia in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). Patient-reported outcome (PRO) is the only follow-up measure. Due to the fragile patient population, low respondent compliance was anticipated. We performed a planned interim analysis of dosimetry and respondent compliance, to ensure that the protocol requirements were met.METHODS: Patients >18 years referred for cervical/thoracic MSCC radiotherapy in 1-10 fractions were included from two centres. Patients were randomized (1:1) to standard RT or oesophagus-sparing RT, where predefined oesophageal dose constraints were prioritized over target coverage. Patients completed a trial diary with daily reports of dysphagia for 5 weeks (PRO-CTC-AE) and weekly quality of life reports for 9 weeks (QLQ-C30, EQ-5D-5L). According to power calculation, 124 patients are needed for primary endpoint analysis. The sample size was inflated to 200 patients to account for the fragile patient population. The co-primary endpoints, peak patient-reported dysphagia, and preserved ability to walk (EQ-5D-5L), are analysed at 5 and 9 weeks, respectively. The interim analysis was conducted 90 days after the inclusion of patient no 100. Respondent compliance was assessed at 5 and 9 weeks. In all RT plans, oesophagus and target doses were evaluated regarding adherence to protocol constraints.RESULTS: From May 2021 to November 2022, 100 patients were included. Fifty-two were randomized to oesophagus-sparing RT. In 23% of these plans, oesophagus constraints were violated. Overall, the dose to both target and oesophagus was significantly lower in the oesophagus-sparing plans. Only 51% and 41% of the patients were evaluable for co-primary endpoint analysis at five and nine weeks, respectively. Mortality and hospitalization rates were significantly larger in patients who completed <4 days PRO quest

Introduction Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients’ anatomy may undergo significant changes during radiotherapy (RT). This potentially affects dose distribution and compromises conformity between planned and delivered dose. Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) is a promising technique to overcome this problem but requires a significant workload. This systematic review aims to estimate the clinical and dosimetric benefits of ART using prospective data. Material and methods A search on PubMed and Web of Science according to the PRISMA guidelines was made on Feb 6, 2023. Search string used was: ‘adaptive radiotherapy head neck cancer’. English language filter was applied. All studies were screened for inclusion on title and abstract, and the full text was read and discussed in the research group in case of uncertainty. Inclusion criteria were a prospective ART strategy for HNC investigating clinical or dosimetric outcomes. Results A total of 1251 articles were identified of which 15 met inclusion criteria. All included studies were published between 2010 and 2023 with a substantial diversity in design, endpoints, and nomenclature. The number of patients treated with ART was small with a median of 20 patients per study (range 4 to 86), undergoing 1-2 replannings. Mean dose to the parotid glands was reduced by 0.4-7.1 Gy. Maximum dose to the spinal cord was reduced by 0.5-4.6 Gy. Only five studies reported clinical outcome and disease control was excellent. Data on toxicity were ambiguous with some studies indicating reduced acute toxicity and xerostomia, while others found reduced quality of life in patients treated with ART. Conclusion The literature on clinical ART in HNC is limited. ART is associated with small reductions in doses to organs at risk, but the influence on toxicity and disease control is uncertain. There is a clear need for larger, prospective trials with a well-defined control group. Keywords: Adaptive radiother, INTRODUCTION: Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients' anatomy may undergo significant changes during radiotherapy (RT). This potentially affects dose distribution and compromises conformity between planned and delivered dose. Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) is a promising technique to overcome this problem but requires a significant workload. This systematic review aims to estimate the clinical and dosimetric benefits of ART using prospective data.MATERIAL AND METHODS: A search on PubMed and Web of Science according to the PRISMA guidelines was made on Feb 6, 2023. Search string used was: 'adaptive radiotherapy head neck cancer'. English language filter was applied. All studies were screened for inclusion on title and abstract, and the full text was read and discussed in the research group in case of uncertainty. Inclusion criteria were a prospective ART strategy for HNC investigating clinical or dosimetric outcomes.RESULTS: A total of 1251 articles were identified of which 15 met inclusion criteria. All included studies were published between 2010 and 2023 with a substantial diversity in design, endpoints, and nomenclature. The number of patients treated with ART was small with a median of 20 patients per study (range 4 to 86), undergoing 1-2 replannings. Mean dose to the parotid glands was reduced by 0.4-7.1 Gy. Maximum dose to the spinal cord was reduced by 0.5-4.6 Gy. Only five studies reported clinical outcome and disease control was excellent. Data on toxicity were ambiguous with some studies indicating reduced acute toxicity and xerostomia, while others found reduced quality of life in patients treated with ART.CONCLUSION: The literature on clinical ART in HNC is limited. ART is associated with small reductions in doses to organs at risk, but the influence on toxicity and disease control is uncertain. There is a clear need for larger, prospective trials with a well-defined control group.

Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) who develop post-treatment distant metastases (DM) have a poor prognosis and few treatment options. DMs from HNSCC are rare compared to other solid tumors, occurring in 5%–20% of patients [Citation1,Citation2]. Some patients with DM may have limited metastases in few metastatic sites. This has been coined the ‘oligometastatic state’ and is most often defined as up to five DMs [Citation3–6]. In HNSCC, 30%–40% of patients with DM have oligometastases at DM diagnosis [Citation3]. Oligometastases may be eligible for surgery, radiotherapy or other local ablative therapies (LAT), and the patients may benefit from an aggressive local strategy with prolonged disease-free survival, deferral of systemic treatment, and sometimes even cure [Citation7–9]. LAT has shown promising results, especially for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) [Citation8,Citation10]. Prospective SBRT studies in the palliative setting include only a few HNSCC patients [Citation11,Citation12]. Historically, fit patients with oligometastatic HNSCC were offered metastasectomy (most often lung resections) and SBRT was infrequently used. Technical advances in radiotherapy have facilitated improved precision and sparing of normal tissue, making SBRT a favorable option. The proportion of patients with oligometastatic HNSCC was assessed in a complete cohort including the potential for SBRT treatment.