Search

This commentary accompanies publication of Kangas and Gross' phase model of emotion coping throughout the process of cancer care. While supporting the model, this commentary additionally highlights the already existing knowledge about the critical role of tumor stage, patient age, uncertainty and fear of recurrence, and gender differences. It is briefly described how all of these factors moderate and mediate the emotion coping process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on whether social support can be a buffer for cancer patients with anxiety and depression. It discusses the match-mismatch study of cancer patients who were made to fill the Psychosocial Screen for Cancer (PSSCAN) questionnaire, with deduction of demographic variables and medical record checks.

Psychological factors may influence survival in breast cancer patients but results of previous research are inconclusive. This prospective population-based study tested whether depression predicts mortality in breast cancer patients. Routinely collected depression screening data were merged with electronically archived provincial cancer registry data and censored data from British Columbia Vital Statistics (extracted in December 2012). Cox proportional-hazards regression analyses were conducted to predict all-cause and breast cancer-specific mortality as a function of depression after controlling for biomedical confounders. Of 1,646 patients, 1,604 had breast cancer stages I-III and 42 had stage IV breast cancer. 176 (11.0 %) versus 28 (66.7 %) were deceased after a median follow-up of 76 months. In patients with curable breast cancer, depression predicted all-cause (HR = 1.54 (95 % CI 1.06-2.25); p = 0.024), but not breast cancer-specific mortality (HR = 1.51 (95 % CI 0.95-2.41); p = 0.084). No association was shown for metastatic disease. Stage-specific analyses demonstrated a 2-2.5-fold increase in breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality in patients with stage I and II disease, but not in patients with stage III or IV breast cancer. In stage I breast cancer patients, age moderated effects of depression such that depressed younger patients diagnosed at age 45 (i.e., mean age −1SD) showed a ninefold (HR = 9.82 (95 % CI 2.26-42.68); p = 0.002) increase in all-cause mortality and depressed patients at 57 a 3.7-fold (HR = 3.69 (95 % CI 1.44-9.48); p = 0.007) increase, while no association was evident in older patients at age 69 (mean age +1SD). Depression is strongly associated with mortality in younger patients with early stage breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Familial cancer services have been developed in many countries in response to a rapidly evolving demand for genetic counseling and testing for breast cancer risk. This article presents a synthesis of the literature on international aspects of genetic counseling and testing and discusses similarities and differences in the provision of genetic counseling and testing, taking seven countries with well established familial cancer services as a case study (Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Netherlands, UK and US). Potential international differences are discussed in terms of: provider and patient attitudes to genetic counseling and genetic testing; utilization rates of genetic testing and prophylactic surgery; and the psychological impact of genetic testing for breast cancer risk. The comparative analyses of utilization rates and the psychological impact of testing indicate a wide range of variability in uptake rates and psychological outcomes, most likely reflecting sample variability and methodological differences in measurement. International comparison studies using controlled designs would be required to ascertain whether international differences exist, and to disentangle the differential role of clinical, individual and family context factors, on the one hand, and the cultural and health system-related factors unique to particular countries, on the other. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy are currently the most effective prevention options for female carriers of the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene. However, especially the mastectomy procedure is very invasive and is chosen rarely among high risk women in Germany. Little is known about how women cope with this surgery and their long-term satisfaction., Methods: Face-to-face interviews were conducted with two BRCA1 mutation carriers, who had undergone prophylactic mastectomy in their twenties 9 and 16 years ago. The process of decision making and long-term satisfaction were analysed using Mayring's qualitative content analysis., Results: Both high risk women had a significant family history of breast and ovarian cancer. They were repeatedly confronted with uncontrollable courses of disease in their relatives who died of breast cancer between the age of 20 and 30 and left small children behind. Although both women experienced different decision making and peri- and post-operative complications, both were satisfied with the decision for prophylactic surgery and showed no regret., Discussion: Deciding to obtain genetic testing pushed women towards further decision making concerning prophylactic surgery in case they carry a mutation. Information about carrier status reduced uncertainty even if the result was adverse. Both high risk women experienced a decrease in cancer related anxiety which may have heightened tolerance for quality of life related impairments. Implications for counseling are described.

Familial cancer services have been developed in many countries in response to a rapidly evolving demand for genetic counseling and testing for breast cancer risk. This article presents a synthesis of the literature on international aspects of genetic counseling and testing and discusses similarities and differences in the provision of genetic counseling and testing, taking seven countries with well established familial cancer services as a case study (Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Netherlands, UK and US). Potential international differences are discussed in terms of: provider and patient attitudes to genetic counseling and genetic testing; utilization rates of genetic testing and prophylactic surgery; and the psychological impact of genetic testing for breast cancer risk. The comparative analyses of utilization rates and the psychological impact of testing indicate a wide range of variability in uptake rates and psychological outcomes, most likely reflecting sample variability and methodological differences in measurement. International comparison studies using controlled designs would be required to ascertain whether international differences exist, and to disentangle the differential role of clinical, individual and family context factors, on the one hand, and the cultural and health system-related factors unique to particular countries, on the other.

Following an overall view of the emotional situation of primary breast cancer patients and of studies exploring shared decision making in this setting we present the results of qualitative analyses about breaking bad news situations and interviews with this group of patients and describe both methods for implementing shared decision making in the treatment of primary breast cancer and an evaluation study. The main result was that most patients showed a lack of information about breast cancer and its therapy, which led to uncertainty. Another source of uncertainty was the lack of preoperative punch biopsy. Due to the so-called "diagnostic shock" patients felt under pressure to make a quick decision over their treatment. This perceived pressure can be effectively countered by a shared decision making approach. To investigate the options in breast cancer therapy, decision aids for diagnostic and therapeutic options have been developed focusing on the following treatment modalities: 1. breast conserving therapy and radiation versus radical mastectomy 2. chemotherapy plus endocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone 3. preoperative versus postoperative chemotherapy. The decision instruments in question were tested in N = 35 breast cancer patients and N = 36 nurses as a control group. The results of a questionnaire survey among both these groups revealed a very positive appraisal of the decision aids. Implementation in daily routine was favoured.