11 results on '"Vodala S"'
Search Results
2. Luspatercept stimulates erythropoiesis, increases iron utilization, and redistributes body iron in transfusion-dependent thalassemia.
- Author
-
Garbowski MW, Ugidos M, Risueño A, Shetty JK, Schwickart M, Hermine O, Porter JB, Thakurta A, and Vodala S
- Subjects
- Adult, Humans, Hepcidins, Erythropoiesis physiology, Receptors, Transferrin, Ferritins, Iron, Thalassemia complications, Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Activin Receptors, Type II
- Abstract
Luspatercept, a ligand-trapping fusion protein, binds select TGF-β superfamily ligands implicated in thalassemic erythropoiesis, promoting late-stage erythroid maturation. Luspatercept reduced transfusion burden in the BELIEVE trial (NCT02604433) of 336 adults with transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT). Analysis of biomarkers in BELIEVE offers novel physiological and clinical insights into benefits offered by luspatercept. Transfusion iron loading rates decreased 20% by 1.4 g (~7 blood units; median iron loading rate difference: -0.05 ± 0.07 mg Fe/kg/day, p< .0001) and serum ferritin (s-ferritin) decreased 19.2% by 269.3 ± 963.7 μg/L (p < .0001), indicating reduced macrophage iron. However, liver iron content (LIC) did not decrease but showed statistically nonsignificant increases from 5.3 to 6.7 mg/g dw. Erythropoietin, growth differentiation factor 15, soluble transferrin receptor 1 (sTfR1), and reticulocytes rose by 93%, 59%, 66%, and 112%, respectively; accordingly, erythroferrone increased by 51% and hepcidin decreased by 53% (all p < .0001). Decreased transfusion with luspatercept in patients with TDT was associated with increased erythropoietic markers and decreasing hepcidin. Furthermore, s-ferritin reduction associated with increased erythroid iron incorporation (marked by sTfR1) allowed increased erythrocyte marrow output, consequently reducing transfusion needs and enhancing rerouting of hemolysis (heme) iron and non-transferrin-bound iron to the liver. LIC increased in patients with intact spleens, consistent with iron redistribution given the hepcidin reduction. Thus, erythropoietic and hepcidin changes with luspatercept in TDT lower transfusion dependency and may redistribute iron from macrophages to hepatocytes, necessitating the use of concomitant chelator cover for effective iron management., (© 2023 Bristol Myers Squibb and The Authors. American Journal of Hematology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Splenic iron decreases without change in volume or liver parameters during luspatercept therapy.
- Author
-
Denton CC, Vodala S, Veluswamy S, Hofstra TC, Coates TD, and Wood JC
- Subjects
- Humans, Activin Receptors, Type II, Erythropoiesis, Liver, beta-Thalassemia drug therapy, Iron
- Abstract
Splenic iron decreased whereas liver iron was stable during luspatercept therapy in some individuals with thalassemia. This suggests a reduction of ineffective erythropoiesis changes the organ distribution of iron and demonstrates that liver iron concentration alone may not accurately reflect total body iron content. This article describes data from subjects enrolled in BELIEVE (NCT02604433) and BEYOND (NCT03342404)., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Long-term utilization and benefit of luspatercept in transfusion-dependent, erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-refractory or -intolerant patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes with ring sideroblasts.
- Author
-
Platzbecker U, Santini V, Komrokji RS, Zeidan AM, Garcia-Manero G, Buckstein R, Miteva D, Keeperman K, Holot N, Nadal JA, Lai Y, Vodala S, Rosettani B, Giuseppi AC, Yucel A, and Fenaux P
- Subjects
- Humans, Erythropoiesis, Activin Receptors, Type II pharmacology, Hematinics therapeutic use, Hematinics pharmacology, Myelodysplastic Syndromes drug therapy
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Efficacy and safety of luspatercept versus epoetin alfa in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naive, transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (COMMANDS): interim analysis of a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial.
- Author
-
Platzbecker U, Della Porta MG, Santini V, Zeidan AM, Komrokji RS, Shortt J, Valcarcel D, Jonasova A, Dimicoli-Salazar S, Tiong IS, Lin CC, Li J, Zhang J, Giuseppi AC, Kreitz S, Pozharskaya V, Keeperman KL, Rose S, Shetty JK, Hayati S, Vodala S, Prebet T, Degulys A, Paolini S, Cluzeau T, Fenaux P, and Garcia-Manero G
- Subjects
- Male, Humans, Female, Aged, Epoetin Alfa adverse effects, Erythropoiesis, Hemoglobins therapeutic use, Dyspnea drug therapy, Body Weight, Hematinics adverse effects, COVID-19, Anemia drug therapy, Anemia etiology, Hypertension drug therapy, Myelodysplastic Syndromes complications, Myelodysplastic Syndromes drug therapy, Myelodysplastic Syndromes chemically induced, Neutropenia
- Abstract
Background: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are the standard-of-care treatment for anaemia in most patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes but responses are limited and transient. Luspatercept promotes late-stage erythroid maturation and has shown durable clinical efficacy in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. In this study, we report the results of a prespecified interim analysis of luspatercept versus epoetin alfa for the treatment of anaemia due to lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes in the phase 3 COMMANDS trial., Methods: The phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled COMMANDS trial is being conducted at 142 sites in 26 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had a diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes of very low risk, low risk, or intermediate risk (per the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System), were ESA-naive, and required red blood cell transfusions (2-6 packed red blood cell units per 8 weeks for ≥8 weeks immediately before randomisation). Integrated response technology was used to randomly assign patients (1:1, block size 4) to luspatercept or epoetin alfa, stratified by baseline red blood cell transfusion burden (<4 units per 8 weeks vs ≥4 units per 8 weeks), endogenous serum erythropoietin concentration (≤200 U/L vs >200 to <500 U/L), and ring sideroblast status (positive vs negative). Luspatercept was administered subcutaneously once every 3 weeks starting at 1·0 mg/kg body weight with possible titration up to 1·75 mg/kg. Epoetin alfa was administered subcutaneously once a week starting at 450 IU/kg body weight with possible titration up to 1050 IU/kg (maximum permitted total dose of 80 000 IU). The primary endpoint was red blood cell transfusion independence for at least 12 weeks with a concurrent mean haemoglobin increase of at least 1·5 g/dL (weeks 1-24), assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. The COMMANDS trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03682536 (active, not recruiting)., Findings: Between Jan 2, 2019 and Aug 31, 2022, 356 patients were randomly assigned to receive luspatercept (178 patients) or epoetin alfa (178 patients), comprising 198 (56%) men and 158 (44%) women (median age 74 years [IQR 69-80]). The interim efficacy analysis was done for 301 patients (147 in the luspatercept group and 154 in the epoetin alfa group) who completed 24 weeks of treatment or discontinued earlier. 86 (59%) of 147 patients in the luspatercept group and 48 (31%) of 154 patients in the epoetin alfa group reached the primary endpoint (common risk difference on response rate 26·6; 95% CI 15·8-37·4; p<0·0001). Median treatment exposure was longer for patients receiving luspatercept (42 weeks [IQR 20-73]) versus epoetin alfa (27 weeks [19-55]). The most frequently reported grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events with luspatercept (≥3% patients) were hypertension, anaemia, dyspnoea, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, pneumonia, COVID-19, myelodysplastic syndromes, and syncope; and with epoetin alfa were anaemia, pneumonia, neutropenia, hypertension, iron overload, COVID-19 pneumonia, and myelodysplastic syndromes. The most common suspected treatment-related adverse events in the luspatercept group (≥3% patients, with the most common event occurring in 5% patients) were fatigue, asthenia, nausea, dyspnoea, hypertension, and headache; and none (≥3% patients) in the epoetin alfa group. One death after diagnosis of acute myeloid leukaemia was considered to be related to luspatercept treatment (44 days on treatment)., Interpretation: In this interim analysis, luspatercept improved the rate at which red blood cell transfusion independence and increased haemoglobin were achieved compared with epoetin alfa in ESA-naive patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Long-term follow-up and additional data will be needed to confirm these results and further refine findings in other subgroups of patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes, including non-mutated SF3B1 or ring sideroblast-negative subgroups., Funding: Celgene and Acceleron Pharma., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests UP reports receiving grant support, paid to GWT-TUD, from Amgen; lecture fees and grant support, paid to the University of Leipzig, from Amgen; fees for serving on a steering committee, consulting fees, and travel support from Bristol Myers Squibb; grant support, paid to GWT-TUD, from Janssen Biotech; grant support, paid to University Dresden, from Merck and Novartis; lecture and consulting fees from Novartis; and consulting fees from AbbVie, Curis, and Geron. UP is also a member of the Medical and Scientific Advisory Board of the MDS Foundation. VS reports receiving research funding, paid to University of Florence, from Bristol Myers Squibb; honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb; honoraria and travel support from Janssen; advisory board fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, CTI BioPharma, Geron, Gilead, Novartis, Otsuka, Servier, and Syros; and serving as the President of the Scientific Committee of the Italian Foundation of Myelodysplastic Syndromes. AMZ reports receiving grant support from AbbVie, ADC Therapeutics, Amgen, Aprea, Astex, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Cardiff Oncology, Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Medimmune, Novartis, Otsuka, Pfizer, Takeda, and Trovagene; consulting fees from AbbVie, Acceleron, Agios, Amgen, Aprea, Astellas Pharma, BeyondSpring, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Cardiff Oncology, Cardinal Health, Daiichi Sankyo, Epizyme, Geron, Gilead, Incyte, Ionis, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Kura, Novartis, Otsuka, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Syndax, Taiho, Takeda, Trovagene, and Tyme; travel support from Cardiff Oncology, Novartis, and Pfizer; and serving on clinical trial committees of AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Geron, Gilead, Kura, and Novartis. RSK reports receiving grant support from Bristol Myers Squibb; speaker bureau fees from AbbVie, CTI BioPharma, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Pharma Essentia, and Servio; and advisory board fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, CTI BioPharma, Geron, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Taiho, and Rigel Pharmaceuticals. JS reports receiving trial-related costs, paid to Monash Health, from Bristol Myers Squibb; grant support, paid to Monash University, from Amgen Australia, Astex Pharmaceuticals, and Bristol Myers Squibb; consultancy fees from Astellas Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Mundipharma, Novartis, Otsuka, and Pfizer; speaker bureau fees from Mundipharma; holding patents WO2017/059319 A2 and WO2011/160170 A1, assigned to Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and WO2021/243421 A1, assigned to Monash University; and serving as a Deputy Chair of the Australasia Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group, Scientific Advisory Committee. DV reports receiving consulting fees from Amgen, Astellas Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Kite Pharma, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Sanofi, and Sobi; honoraria from Amgen, Astellas Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gebro, Grifols, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Kite Pharma, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Sobi; travel support from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals; and advisory or data safety monitoring board fees from Novartis. AJ reports receiving consulting fees from AbbVie and Bristol Myers Squibb; honoraria from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Novartis; travel support from AbbVie; advisory or data safety monitoring board fees from AbbVie and Bristol Myers Squibb; and a leadership or fiduciary role in the Czech MDS Group. IST reports receiving consulting and speaker bureau fees from Pfizer. JL reports being employed by and owning stock in Bristol Myers Squibb. JZ reports being employed by and owning stock in Bristol Myers Squibb. ACG reports being employed by and owning stock in Bristol Myers Squibb. SK reports being employed by and owning stock in Bristol Myers Squibb. VP reports being employed by Bristol Myers Squibb and owning stock in Merck. KLK reports being employed by and owning stock in Bristol Myers Squibb and owning stock in Pfizer. SR reports being employed by, owning stock in, and receiving travel support from Bristol Myers Squibb. JKS reports being employed by and owning stock in Bristol Myers Squibb. SH reports being employed by Bristol Myers Squibb. SV reports being employed by and owning stock in Bristol Myers Squibb. TP reports being employed by and owning stock in Bristol Myers Squibb. TC reports receiving consulting fees from AbbVie, Celgene, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Servier; honoraria from Celgene, Novartis, Servier, Syros, and Takeda; travel support from AbbVie, Celgene, Novartis, and Pfizer; and advisory or data safety monitoring board fees from Novartis. PF reports receiving honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb and the Groupe Francophone des Myélodysplasies and serving as the chairman of the Groupe Francophone des Myélodysplasies. GG-M reports receiving grant support from Celgene. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. The transcription factor Cabut coordinates energy metabolism and the circadian clock in response to sugar sensing.
- Author
-
Bartok O, Teesalu M, Ashwall-Fluss R, Pandey V, Hanan M, Rovenko BM, Poukkula M, Havula E, Moussaieff A, Vodala S, Nahmias Y, Kadener S, and Hietakangas V
- Subjects
- Animals, Drosophila Proteins genetics, Drosophila melanogaster, Glucose genetics, Glycerol metabolism, Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxykinase (ATP) genetics, Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxykinase (ATP) metabolism, Transcription Factors genetics, Circadian Clocks physiology, Drosophila Proteins metabolism, Energy Metabolism physiology, Feeding Behavior physiology, Glucose metabolism, Transcription Factors metabolism, Transcriptome physiology
- Abstract
Nutrient sensing pathways adjust metabolism and physiological functions in response to food intake. For example, sugar feeding promotes lipogenesis by activating glycolytic and lipogenic genes through the Mondo/ChREBP-Mlx transcription factor complex. Concomitantly, other metabolic routes are inhibited, but the mechanisms of transcriptional repression upon sugar sensing have remained elusive. Here, we characterize cabut (cbt), a transcription factor responsible for the repressive branch of the sugar sensing transcriptional network in Drosophila. We demonstrate that cbt is rapidly induced upon sugar feeding through direct regulation by Mondo-Mlx. We found that CBT represses several metabolic targets in response to sugar feeding, including both isoforms of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (pepck). Deregulation of pepck1 (CG17725) in mlx mutants underlies imbalance of glycerol and glucose metabolism as well as developmental lethality. Furthermore, we demonstrate that cbt provides a regulatory link between nutrient sensing and the circadian clock. Specifically, we show that a subset of genes regulated by the circadian clock are also targets of CBT. Moreover, perturbation of CBT levels leads to deregulation of the circadian transcriptome and circadian behavioral patterns., (© 2015 The Authors.)
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Ponatinib inhibits polyclonal drug-resistant KIT oncoproteins and shows therapeutic potential in heavily pretreated gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients.
- Author
-
Garner AP, Gozgit JM, Anjum R, Vodala S, Schrock A, Zhou T, Serrano C, Eilers G, Zhu M, Ketzer J, Wardwell S, Ning Y, Song Y, Kohlmann A, Wang F, Clackson T, Heinrich MC, Fletcher JA, Bauer S, and Rivera VM
- Subjects
- Animals, Antineoplastic Agents chemistry, Antineoplastic Agents therapeutic use, Benzamides pharmacology, Cell Line, Tumor, Disease Models, Animal, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Exons, Female, Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors diagnosis, Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors drug therapy, Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors pathology, Humans, Imatinib Mesylate, Imidazoles chemistry, Imidazoles therapeutic use, Indoles pharmacology, Inhibitory Concentration 50, Models, Molecular, Molecular Conformation, Mutation, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Piperazines pharmacology, Protein Binding, Protein Kinase Inhibitors chemistry, Protein Kinase Inhibitors therapeutic use, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit antagonists & inhibitors, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit chemistry, Pyridazines chemistry, Pyridazines therapeutic use, Pyrimidines pharmacology, Pyrroles pharmacology, Sunitinib, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Tumor Burden drug effects, Tumor Burden genetics, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Antineoplastic Agents pharmacology, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm genetics, Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors genetics, Imidazoles pharmacology, Protein Kinase Inhibitors pharmacology, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit genetics, Pyridazines pharmacology
- Abstract
Purpose: KIT is the major oncogenic driver of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Imatinib, sunitinib, and regorafenib are approved therapies; however, efficacy is often limited by the acquisition of polyclonal secondary resistance mutations in KIT, with those located in the activation (A) loop (exons 17/18) being particularly problematic. Here, we explore the KIT-inhibitory activity of ponatinib in preclinical models and describe initial characterization of its activity in patients with GIST., Experimental Design: The cellular and in vivo activities of ponatinib, imatinib, sunitinib, and regorafenib against mutant KIT were evaluated using an accelerated mutagenesis assay and a panel of engineered and GIST-derived cell lines. The ponatinib-KIT costructure was also determined. The clinical activity of ponatinib was examined in three patients with GIST previously treated with all three FDA-approved agents., Results: In engineered and GIST-derived cell lines, ponatinib potently inhibited KIT exon 11 primary mutants and a range of secondary mutants, including those within the A-loop. Ponatinib also induced regression in engineered and GIST-derived tumor models containing these secondary mutations. In a mutagenesis screen, 40 nmol/L ponatinib was sufficient to suppress outgrowth of all secondary mutants except V654A, which was suppressed at 80 nmol/L. This inhibitory profile could be rationalized on the basis of structural analyses. Ponatinib (30 mg daily) displayed encouraging clinical activity in two of three patients with GIST., Conclusion: Ponatinib possesses potent activity against most major clinically relevant KIT mutants and has demonstrated preliminary evidence of activity in patients with refractory GIST. These data strongly support further evaluation of ponatinib in patients with GIST., (©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.)
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Nascent-Seq analysis of Drosophila cycling gene expression.
- Author
-
Rodriguez J, Tang CH, Khodor YL, Vodala S, Menet JS, and Rosbash M
- Subjects
- Animals, Circadian Rhythm physiology, Circadian Rhythm Signaling Peptides and Proteins genetics, Drosophila Proteins genetics, Drosophila melanogaster physiology, Gene Expression, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, RNA Processing, Post-Transcriptional, RNA, Messenger genetics, RNA, Messenger metabolism, Circadian Rhythm genetics, Drosophila melanogaster genetics, Genes, Insect
- Abstract
Rhythmic mRNA expression is a hallmark of circadian biology and has been described in numerous experimental systems including mammals. A small number of core clock gene mRNAs and a much larger number of output mRNAs are under circadian control. The rhythmic expression of core clock genes is regulated at the transcriptional level, and this regulation is important for the timekeeping mechanism. However, the relative contribution of transcriptional and post transcriptional regulation to global circadian mRNA oscillations is unknown. To address this issue in Drosophila, we isolated nascent RNA from adult fly heads collected at different time points and subjected it to high-throughput sequencing. mRNA was isolated and sequence din parallel. Some genes had cycling nascent RNAs with no cycling mRNA, caused,most likely, by light-mediated read-through transcription. Most genes with cycling mRNAs had significant nascent RNA cycling amplitudes, indicating a prominent role for circadian transcriptional regulation. However, a considerable fraction had higher mRNA amplitudes than nascent RNA amplitudes. The same comparison for core clock gene mRNAs gives rise to a qualitatively similar conclusion. The data therefore indicate a significant quantitative contribution of post transcriptional regulation to mRNA cycling.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. The oscillating miRNA 959-964 cluster impacts Drosophila feeding time and other circadian outputs.
- Author
-
Vodala S, Pescatore S, Rodriguez J, Buescher M, Chen YW, Weng R, Cohen SM, and Rosbash M
- Subjects
- Animals, Circadian Clocks genetics, Drosophila Proteins genetics, Drosophila Proteins metabolism, Eating, Gene Expression Regulation, Gene Knock-In Techniques, Gene Knockout Techniques, Immunity, Innate, MicroRNAs genetics, Multigene Family, RNA, Messenger metabolism, Transcription Factors genetics, Transcription Factors metabolism, Transcription, Genetic, Drosophila melanogaster metabolism, MicroRNAs metabolism
- Abstract
We sequenced Drosophila head RNA to identify a small set of miRNAs that undergo robust circadian cycling. We concentrated on a cluster of six miRNAs, mir-959-964, all of which peak at about ZT12 or lights off. The cluster pri-miRNA is transcribed under bona fide circadian transcriptional control, and all six mature miRNAs have short half-lives, a requirement for cycling. A viable Gal4 knockin strain localizes prominent cluster miRNA expression to the adult head fat body. Analysis of cluster knockout and overexpression strains indicates that innate immunity, metabolism, and feeding behavior are under cluster miRNA regulation. Manipulation of food intake also affects the levels and timing of cluster miRNA transcription with no more than minor effects on the core circadian oscillator. These observations indicate a feedback circuit between feeding time and cluster miRNA expression function as well as a surprising role of posttranscriptional regulation in the circadian control of these phenotypes., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. The nuclear exosome and adenylation regulate posttranscriptional tethering of yeast GAL genes to the nuclear periphery.
- Author
-
Vodala S, Abruzzi KC, and Rosbash M
- Subjects
- Base Sequence, Biological Assay, Exoribonucleases, Exosome Multienzyme Ribonuclease Complex, Galactokinase metabolism, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Genes, Reporter, Green Fluorescent Proteins metabolism, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation genetics, Plasmids genetics, Poly A metabolism, RNA, Catalytic metabolism, RNA, Fungal genetics, RNA, Messenger genetics, RNA, Messenger metabolism, Recombinant Fusion Proteins metabolism, Saccharomyces cerevisiae enzymology, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins metabolism, Substrate Specificity, Transcriptional Activation genetics, Cell Nucleus genetics, Galactokinase genetics, Genes, Fungal, Polyadenylation genetics, Saccharomyces cerevisiae genetics, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins genetics, Transcription, Genetic
- Abstract
GAL genes and other activated yeast genes remain tethered to the nuclear periphery even after transcriptional shutoff. To identify factors that affect this tethering, we designed a plasmid-based visual screen. Although many factors affected GAL tethering during transcription, fewer specifically affected posttranscriptional tethering. Tw o of these, Rrp6p and Lrp1p, are nuclear exosome components known to contribute to RNA retention near transcription sites (dot RNA). Moreover, these exosome mutations lead to a substantial posttranscriptional increase in polyadenylated GAL1 3' ends. This accompanies a loss of unadenylated (pA-) GAL1 RNA and a loss of posttranscriptional gene-periphery tethering, as well as a decrease in dot RNA levels. This suggests that the exosome inhibits adenylation of some GAL1 transcripts, which results in the accumulation of pA- RNA adjacent to the GAL1 gene. We propose that this dot RNA, probably via RNP proteins, contributes to the physical tether linking the GAL1 gene to the nuclear periphery.
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. The unfolded protein response transducer Ire1p contains a nuclear localization sequence recognized by multiple beta importins.
- Author
-
Goffin L, Vodala S, Fraser C, Ryan J, Timms M, Meusburger S, Catimel B, Nice EC, Silver PA, Xiao CY, Jans DA, and Gething MJ
- Subjects
- Active Transport, Cell Nucleus, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Basic-Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors genetics, Cell Nucleus metabolism, Consensus Sequence, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Intracellular Membranes metabolism, Kinetics, Membrane Glycoproteins chemistry, Membrane Glycoproteins genetics, Mice, Molecular Sequence Data, Nuclear Localization Signals chemistry, Point Mutation genetics, Protein Binding, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases chemistry, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases genetics, Protein Structure, Tertiary, RNA Splicing genetics, RNA, Messenger genetics, RNA, Messenger metabolism, Repressor Proteins genetics, Saccharomyces cerevisiae cytology, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins chemistry, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins genetics, ran GTP-Binding Protein metabolism, Membrane Glycoproteins metabolism, Nuclear Localization Signals metabolism, Protein Folding, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases metabolism, Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolism, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins metabolism, beta Karyopherins metabolism
- Abstract
The Ire1p transmembrane receptor kinase/endonuclease transduces the unfolded protein response (UPR) from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the nucleus in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In this study, we analyzed the capacity of a highly basic sequence in the linker region of Ire1p to function as a nuclear localization sequence (NLS) both in vivo and in vitro. This 18-residue sequence is capable of targeting green fluorescent protein to the nucleus of yeast cells in a process requiring proteins involved in the Ran GTPase cycle that facilitates nuclear import. Mutagenic analysis and importin binding studies demonstrate that the Ire1p linker region contains overlapping potential NLSs: at least one classical NLS (within sequences 642KKKRKR647 and/or 653KKGR656) that is recognized by yeast importin alpha (Kap60p) and a novel betaNLS (646KRGSRGGKKGRK657) that is recognized by several yeast importin beta homologues. Kinetic binding data suggest that binding to importin beta proteins would predominate in vivo. The UPR, and in particular ER stress-induced HAC1 mRNA splicing, is inhibited by point mutations in the Ire1p NLS that inhibit nuclear localization and also requires functional RanGAP and Ran GEF proteins. The NLS-dependent nuclear localization of Ire1p would thus seem to be central to its role in UPR signaling.
- Published
- 2006
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.