Search

Arctic rain on snow (ROS) deposits liquid water onto existing snowpacks. Upon refreezing, this can form icy crusts at the surface or within the snowpack. By altering radar backscatter and microwave emissivity, ROS over sea ice can influence the accuracy of sea ice variables retrieved from satellite radar altimetry, scatterometers, and passive microwave radiometers. During the Arctic Ocean MOSAiC (Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate) expedition, there was an unprecedented opportunity to observe a ROS event using in situ active and passive microwave instruments similar to those deployed on satellite platforms. During liquid water accumulation in the snowpack from rain and increased melt, there was a 4-fold decrease in radar energy returned at Ku- and Ka-bands. After the snowpack refroze and ice layers formed, this decrease was followed by a 6-fold increase in returned energy. Besides altering the radar backscatter, analysis of the returned waveforms shows the waveform shape changed in response to rain and refreezing. Microwave emissivity at 19 and 89 GHz increased with increasing liquid water content and decreased as the snowpack refroze, yet subsequent ice layers altered the polarization difference. Corresponding analysis of the CryoSat-2 waveform shape and backscatter as well as AMSR2 brightness temperatures further shows that the rain and refreeze were significant enough to impact satellite returns. Our analysis provides the first detailed in situ analysis of the impacts of ROS and subsequent refreezing on both active and passive microwave observations, providing important baseline knowledge for detecting ROS over sea ice and assessing their impacts on satellite-derived sea ice variables.

Wind transport alters the snow topography and microstructure on sea ice through snow redistribution controlled by deposition and erosion. The impact of these processes on radar signatures is poorly understood. Here, we examine the effects of snow redistribution on Arctic sea ice from Ka- and Ku-band radar signatures. Measurements were obtained during two wind events in November 2019 during the MOSAiC expedition. During both events, changes in Ka- and Ku-band radar waveforms and backscatter coincident with surface height changes measured from a terrestrial laser scanner are observed. At both frequencies, snow redistribution events increased the dominance of the air/snow interface at nadir as the dominant radar scattering surface, due to wind densifying the snow surface and uppermost layers. The radar waveform data also detect the presence of previous air/snow interfaces, buried beneath newly deposited snow. The additional scattering from previous air/snow interfaces could therefore affect the range retrieved from Ka- and Ku-band satellite radar altimeters. The relative scattering contribution of the air/snow interface decreases, and the snow/sea ice interface increases with increasing incidence angles. Relative to pre-wind conditions, azimuthally averaged backscatter at nadir during the wind events increases by up to 8 dB (Ka-band) and 5 dB (Ku-band). Binned backscatter within 5° azimuth bins reveals substantial backscatter variability in the radar footprint at all incidence angles and polarizations. The sensitivity of the co-polarized phase difference is linked to changes in snow settling and temperature-gradient induced grain metamorphism, demonstrating the potential of the radar to discriminate between newly deposited and older snow on sea ice. Our results reveal the importance of wind, through its geophysical impact on Ka- and Ku-band radar signatures of snow on sea ice and has implications for reliable interpretation of airborne and satellite radar measurements of snow-covered sea ice.

Snow depth observations from airborne snow radars, such as the NASA's Operation IceBridge (OIB) mission, have recently been used in altimeter-derived sea ice thickness estimates, as well as for model parameterization. A number of validation studies comparing airborne and in situ snow depth measurements have been conducted in the western Arctic Ocean, demonstrating the utility of the airborne data. However, there have been no validation studies in the Atlantic sector of the Arctic. Recent observations in this region suggest a significant and predominant shift towards a snow-ice regime caused by deep snow on thin sea ice. During the Norwegian young sea Ice, Climate and Ecosystems (ICE) expedition (N-ICE2015) in the area north of Svalbard, a validation study was conducted on 19 March 2015. This study collected ground truth data during an OIB overflight. Snow and ice thickness measurements were obtained across a two-dimensional (2-D) 400 m × 60 m grid. Additional snow and ice thickness measurements collected in situ from adjacent ice floes helped to place the measurements obtained at the gridded survey field site into a more regional context. Widespread negative freeboards and flooding of the snowpack were observed during the N-ICE2015 expedition due to the general situation of thick snow on relatively thin sea ice. These conditions caused brine wicking into and saturation of the basal snow layers. This causes the airborne radar signal to undergo more diffuse scattering, resulting in the location of the radar main scattering horizon being detected well above the snow–ice interface. This leads to a subsequent underestimation of snow depth; if only radar-based information is used, the average airborne snow depth was 0.16 m thinner than that measured in situ at the 2-D survey field. Regional data within 10 km of the 2-D survey field suggested however a smaller deviation between average airborne and in situ snow depth, a 0.06 m underestimate in snow depth by the airborne radar, which is close to the resolution limit of the OIB snow radar system. Our results also show a broad snow depth distribution, indicating a large spatial variability in snow across the region. Differences between the airborne snow radar and in situ measurements fell within the standard deviation of the in situ data (0.15–0.18 m). Our results suggest that seawater flooding of the snow–ice interface leads to underestimations of snow depth or overestimations of sea ice freeboard measured from radar altimetry, in turn impacting the accuracy of sea ice thickness estimates.

Owing to differing and complex snow geophysical properties, radar waves of different wavelengths undergo variable penetration through snow-covered sea ice. However, the mechanisms influencing radar altimeter backscatter from snow-covered sea ice, especially at Ka- and Ku-band frequencies, and the impact on the Ka- and Ku-band radar scattering horizon or the “track point” (i.e. the scattering layer depth detected by the radar re-tracker) are not well understood. In this study, we evaluate the Ka- and Ku-band radar scattering horizon with respect to radar penetration and ice floe buoyancy using a first-order scattering model and the Archimedes principle. The scattering model is forced with snow depth data from the European Space Agency (ESA) climate change initiative (CCI) round-robin data package, in which NASA's Operation IceBridge (OIB) data and climatology are included, and detailed snow geophysical property profiles from the Canadian Arctic. Our simulations demonstrate that the Ka- and Ku-band track point difference is a function of snow depth; however, the simulated track point difference is much smaller than what is reported in the literature from the Ku-band CryoSat-2 and Ka-band SARAL/AltiKa satellite radar altimeter observations. We argue that this discrepancy in the Ka- and Ku-band track point differences is sensitive to ice type and snow depth and its associated geophysical properties. Snow salinity is first increasing the Ka- and Ku-band track point difference when the snow is thin and then decreasing the difference when the snow is thick (>0.1 m). A relationship between the Ku-band radar scattering horizon and snow depth is found. This relationship has implications for (1) the use of snow climatology in the conversion of radar freeboard into sea ice thickness and (2) the impact of variability in measured snow depth on the derived ice thickness. For both (1) and (2), the impact of using a snow climatology versus the actual snow depth is relatively small on the radar freeboard, only raising the radar freeboard by 0.03 times the climatological snow depth plus 0.03 times the real snow depth. The radar freeboard is a function of both radar scattering and floe buoyancy. This study serves to enhance our understanding of microwave interactions towards improved accuracy of snow depth and sea ice thickness retrievals via the combination of the currently operational and ESA's forthcoming Ka- and Ku-band dual-frequency CRISTAL radar altimeter missions.

The quest for enhancing the performance of rocket launcher has led to the development of rocket nozzles with a high expansion ratio. Even though high area ratio rockets give better efficiency at high altitude conditions, the same nozzle when operated at the low altitude results in separation of flow well within the nozzle. This unsteady and asymmetric separation of flow from the divergent wall leads to uncontrollable side loads and high dynamic loads. If this problem were to overcome, the rocket engine performance will improve substantially. In the paper, flow separation in the main nozzle is eliminated with secondary injection at the lip of the main nozzle. This prevents the entry of atmospheric air into the separation zone and full-flowing conditions are achieved in the main nozzle at a relatively lower chamber pressure of main nozzle. The impact of inlet pressure of the main nozzle, the secondary injection, its pressure, and the angle of introduction on the main nozzle flow are studied using computational methods. It was observed that the injection of the secondary nozzle flow parallel to the main nozzle gives better results. The increase in secondary injection pressure seems to be favourable in eliminating flow separation in the main nozzle.

Uncertainty in snow properties impacts the accuracy of Arctic sea ice thickness estimates from radar altimetry. On first-year sea ice (FYI), spatiotemporal variations in snow properties can cause the Ku-band main radar scattering horizon to appear above the snow/sea ice interface. This can increase the estimated sea ice freeboard by several centimeters, leading to FYI thickness overestimations. This article examines the expected changes in Ku-band main scattering horizon and its impact on FYI thickness estimates, with variations in snow temperature, salinity, and density derived from ten naturally occurring Arctic FYI Cases encompassing saline/nonsaline, warm/cold, simple/complexly layered snow (4-45 cm) overlying FYI (48-170 cm). Using a semi-empirical modeling approach, snow properties from these Cases are used to derive layer-wise brine volume and dielectric constant estimates, to simulate the Ku-band main scattering horizon and delays in radar propagation speed. Differences between modeled and observed FYI thickness are calculated to assess sources of error. Under both cold and warm conditions, saline snow covers are shown to shift the main scattering horizon above from the snow/sea ice interface, causing thickness retrieval errors. Overestimates in FYI thicknesses of up to 65% are found for warm, saline snow overlaying thin sea ice. Our simulations exhibited a distinct shift in the main scattering horizon when the snow layer densities became greater than 440 kg/m3, especially under warmer snow conditions. Our simulations suggest a mean Ku-band propagation delay for snow of 39%, which is higher than 25%, suggested in previous studies.

Future synthetic aperture radar missions at L-band frequency, such as NASA-ISO NISAR and Copernicus ROSE-L, will provide relatively low frequency, deeply penetrating, snow and sea ice signals compared to traditional C-band and higher frequencies. A portable, sled- or tower-mounted L-band frequency radar scatterometer system designed to measure the radar backscatter characteristics of snow and sea ice in cold conditions in advance of these missions is described. The first polarimetric backscatter measurements collected using the system occurred during field campaigns in the Canadian Arctic in 2018, and the international Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition in the central Arctic in 2019/20. Geophysical measurements of the snow-covered sea ice volume enable the signature controlling properties to be examined in the context of L-band SAR utilization.

Mean sea ice thickness is a sensitive indicator of Arctic climate change and is in long-term decline despite significant interannual variability. Current thickness estimations from satellite radar altimeters employ a snow climatology for converting range measurements to sea ice thickness, but this introduces unrealistically low interannual variability and trends. When the sea ice thickness in the period 2002–2018 is calculated using new snow data with more realistic variability and trends, we find mean sea ice thickness in four of the seven marginal seas to be declining between 60 %–100 % faster than when calculated with the conventional climatology. When analysed as an aggregate area, the mean sea ice thickness in the marginal seas is in statistically significant decline for 6 of 7 winter months. This is observed despite a 76 % increase in interannual variability between the methods in the same time period. On a seasonal timescale we find that snow data exert an increasingly strong control on thickness variability over the growth season, contributing 46 % in October but 70 % by April. Higher variability and faster decline in the sea ice thickness of the marginal seas has wide implications for our understanding of the polar climate system and our predictions for its change.

Retrieving the thickness of sea ice, and its snow cover, on long time- and length-scales is critical for studying climate. Satellite altimetry has provided estimations of sea ice thickness spanning nearly three decades, and more recently altimetry techniques have provided estimations of snow depth, using dual-band satellite altimetry data. These approaches are based on assumptions about the main scattering surfaces of the radiation. The dominant scattering surface is often assumed to be the snow/ice interface at Ku-band frequencies and the air/snow interface at Ka-band and laser frequencies. It has previously been shown that these assumptions do not always hold, but field data to investigate the dominant scattering surfaces and investigate how these relate to the physical snow and ice characteristics were spatially and temporally limited. The MOSAiC expedition provided a unique opportunity to gather data using a newly-developed Ku- and Ka-band radar 'KuKa' deployed over snow-covered sea ice, along with coincident field measurements of snow and ice properties. We present transect data gathered with the instrument looking at nadir to demonstrate how the scattering characteristics vary spatially and temporally in the Ku- and Ka-bands, and discuss implications for interpretation of dual-frequency satellite radar altimetry data. We compare KuKa data with field measurements to demonstrate snow depth retrieval using Ku- and Ka-band data.

We present the baseline and detailed assessment of Ka- and Ku-band microwave signatures of winter (Legs 1 and 2) and melt season (Leg 4) snow-covered sea ice, acquired during the 2019-2020 MOSAiC International Arctic Drift Expedition. The microwave signatures were acquired using a surface-based, fully-polarimetric, Ku- and Ka-band radar (KuKa radar), acquired coincident with in situ meteorological and snow/sea ice geophysical property measurements. The KuKa radar mimicked the center frequencies of presently operational Ku- and Ka-band satellite radar altimeter and scatterometer missions.Preliminary observations, supported by microwave backscatter modeling indicates dominant Ka-band snow surface scattering and its strong sensitivity due to snow surface roughness and its changes, induced by snow accumulation, wind-driven redistribution/erosion. For Ku-band, winter backscatter signatures originate from the snow/sea ice interface. We also showcase the winter backscatter sensitivity through its impact during the November 2019 warm storm. During advanced melt, the Ka- and Ku-band signatures demonstrates sensitivity to snow surface melt/refreeze diurnal cycling, caused by fluctuations in liquid water content. During the melt cycle, scattering loss and absorption dominated both frequencies, while refrozen snow surface scattering dominated the refreeze cycle (observed during morning and evening scans). Observations from the KuKa radar will in turn provide critical understanding of snow/sea ice geophysical processes over the annual cycle, that will improve the accuracy of satellite-based retrievals of snow/sea ice critical state variables such as snow depth, sea ice thickness, freeze-up and melt-onset timings etc, from operational and forthcoming missions such as AltiKa, CryoSat-2, Sentinel-3, ScatSat-1, CRISTAL etc.

Current, and ongoing observations, of Arctic sea ice, indicate a trend towards a younger, thinner and more mobile pack that exhibits significant inter-annual variability. Satellite and airborne radar altimeters have been used extensively to quantify these changes by deriving sea ice freeboard to infer sea ice thickness. Radar returns from altimeters are impacted by both the morphology of snow and ice features on the sea ice surface, in addition to the radar properties of the snowpack, with both contributing to uncertainties in radar-derived sea ice freeboard. Here we make use of airborne lidar data, collected as part of the MOSAiC expedition in the winter of 2019/2020, to investigate the effect of sea ice surface morphology on radar altimeter measurements. We quantify these effects using 'KuKaSim' a forward-modelling approach based on the KuKa instrument deployed at MOSAiC, which allows us to investigate how simulated radar returns vary with radar height. Our results allow us to better constrain the altimetric uncertainty resulting from ice surface morphology, with respect to both radar height and sea ice type, leading to an enhanced understanding of sources of uncertainty in altimeter-derived sea ice thickness products.

Studying carbon dioxide in the ocean helps to understand how the ocean will be impacted by climate change and respond to increasing fossil fuel emissions. The marine carbonate system is not well characterized in the Arctic, where challenging logistics and extreme conditions limit observations of atmospheric CO2 flux and ocean acidification. Here, we present a high-resolution marine carbon system data set covering the complete cycle of sea-ice growth and melt in an Arctic estuary (Nunavut, Canada). This data set was collected through three consecutive yearlong deployments of sensors for pH and partial pressure of CO2 in seawater (pCO2sw) on a cabled underwater observatory. The sensors were remarkably stable compared to discrete samples: While corrections for offsets were required in some instances, we did not observe significant drift over the deployment periods. Our observations revealed a strong seasonality in this marine carbon system. Prior to sea-ice formation, air–sea gas exchange and respiration were the dominant processes, leading to increasing pCO2sw and reduced aragonite saturation state (ΩAr). During sea-ice growth, water column respiration and brine rejection (possibly enriched in dissolved inorganic carbon, relative to alkalinity, due to ikaite precipitation in sea ice) drove pCO2sw to supersaturation and lowered ΩAr to < 1. Shortly after polar sunrise, the ecosystem became net autotrophic, returning pCO2sw to undersaturation. The biological community responsible for this early switch to autotrophy (well before ice algae or phytoplankton blooms) requires further investigation. After sea-ice melt initiated, an under-ice phytoplankton bloom strongly reduced aqueous carbon (chlorophyll-a max of 2.4 µg L–1), returning ΩAr to > 1 after 4.5 months of undersaturation. Based on simple extrapolations of anthropogenic carbon inventories, we suspect that this seasonal undersaturation would not have occurred naturally. At ice breakup, the sensor platform recorded low pCO2sw (230 µatm), suggesting a strong CO2 sink during the open water season.

Mean sea ice thickness is a sensitive indicator of Arctic climate change and in long-term decline despite significant interannual variability. Current thickness estimations from satellite radar altimeters employ a snow climatology for converting range measurements to sea ice thickness, but this introduces unrealistically low interannual variability and trends. When the sea ice thickness in the period 2002–2018 is calculated using new snow data with more realistic variability and trends, we find mean sea ice thickness in three of the seven marginal seas to be declining between 70–100 % faster than when calculated with the conventional method. When analysed as an aggregate, the mean ice thickness in the marginal seas is now in statistically significant decline for four of seven winter months. This is observed despite a 58% increase in interannual variability between the methods in the same time period. On a seasonal timescale we find that snow data exerts an increasingly strong control on thickness variability over the growth season, contributing only 20 % in October but 72 % by April. Higher variability and faster decline in the sea ice thickness of the marginal seas has wide implications for our understanding of the polar climate system and our predictions for its change, as well as for stakeholders involved in Arctic shipping and natural resource extraction.

The snow cover on sea ice is an important parameter controlling heat and momentum fluxes in our polar regions. Our understanding of snow thickness distributions on sea ice is severely limited by its vastness and numerous logistical difficulties. As such, we rarely collect enough in situ data from similar geographic locations to determine if and how the snow thickness distribution changes spatiotemporally. Geophysical changes in snow cover manifest as differences in dielectric properties, which are detectable in microwave emission and backscatter. Active microwave remote sensing offers improved spatial resolution when compared to passive microwave approaches. We apply our recently developed method that exploits the indirect thermodynamic control of the snow cover on near ice surface geophysical properties. The variance of C-band (5.3 GHz HH-polarization) microwave backscatter in winter (prior to melt) is assessed and is then used to estimate relative snow cover thickness and distribution. We assess the capability of our approach over landfast, first-year sea ice in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago and evaluate and compare our method against the Canadian Regional Ice Ocean Prediction system and AMSR2 passive microwave snow thickness estimates. Results demonstrate that this method can separate thick snow from thin snow on thick FYI within a thickness range of 5 to 45 cm at a spatial resolution of less than 5 km.

Owing to differing and complex snow geophysical properties, radar waves of different wavelengths undergo variable penetration through snow-covered sea ice. However, the mechanisms influencing radar altimeter backscatter from snow-covered sea ice, especially at Ka- and Ku-band frequencies, and its impact on the Ka- and Ku-band radar scattering horizon or the "track point" (i.e. the scattering layer depth detected by the radar re-tracker), are not well understood. In this study, we evaluate the Ka- and Ku-band radar scattering horizon with respect to radar penetration and ice floe buoyancy using a first-order scattering model and Archimedes’ principle. The scattering model is forced with snow depth data from the European Space Agency (ESA) climate change initiative (CCI) round robin data package, NASA’s Operation Ice Bridge (OIB) data and climatology, and detailed snow geophysical property profiles from the Canadian Arctic. Our simulations demonstrate that the Ka- and Ku-band track point difference is a function of snow depth, however, the simulated track point difference is much smaller than what is reported in the literature from the CryoSat-2 Ku-band and SARAL/AltiKa Ka-band satellite radar altimeter observations. We argue that this discrepancy in the Ka- and Ku-band track point differences are sensitive to ice type and snow depth and its associated geophysical properties. Snow salinity is first increasing the Ka- and Ku-band track-point difference when the snow is thin and then decreasing the difference when the snow is thick (> 10 cm). A relationship between the Ku-band radar scattering horizon and snow depth is found. This relationship has implications for 1) the use of snow climatology in the conversion of radar freeboard into sea ice thickness and 2) the impact of variability in measured snow depth on the derived ice thickness. For both 1 and 2, the impact of using a snow climatology versus the actual snow depth is relatively small on the measured freeboard, by only raising the measured freeboard by 0.03 times the climatological snow depth plus 0.03 times the real snow depth. This study serves to enhance our understanding of microwave interactions towards improved accuracy of snow depth and sea ice thickness retrievals from combining currently operational and upcoming Ka- and Ku-band dual-frequency radar altimeter missions, such as ESA’s Copernicus High Priority Candidate Mission CRISTAL.

Snow thickness observations from airborne snow radars, such as the NASA’s Operation IceBridge (OIB) mission, have recently been used in altimeter-derived sea ice thickness estimates, as well as for model parameterization. A number of validation studies comparing airborne and in situ snow thickness measurements have been conducted in the western Arctic Ocean, demonstrating the utility of the airborne data. However, there have been no validation studies in the Atlantic sector of the Arctic. Recent observations in this region suggest a significant and predominant shift towards a snow-ice regime, caused by deep snow on thin sea ice. During the Norwegian young sea ICE expedition (N-ICE2015) in the area north of Svalbard, a validation study was conducted on March 19, 2015, during which ground truth data were collected during an OIB overflight. Snow and ice thickness measurements were obtained across a two dimensional (2-D) 400 m × 60 m grid. Additional snow and ice thickness measurements collected in situ from adjacent ice floes helped to place the measurements obtained at the gridded survey field site into a more regional context. Widespread negative freeboards and flooding of the snow pack were observed during the N-ICE2015 expedition, due to the general situation of thick snow on relatively thin sea ice. These conditions caused brine wicking and saturation into the basal snow layers, causing more diffuse scattering and influenced the airborne radar signal to detect the radar main scattering horizon well above the snow/sea ice interface, resulting in a subsequent underestimation of total snow thickness, if only radar-based information is used. The average airborne snow thickness was 0.16 m thinner than that measured in situ at the 2-D survey field. Regional data within 10 km of the 2-D survey field suggested however a smaller deviation between average airborne and in situ snow thickness, a 0.06 m underestimate in snow thickness by the airborne radar, which is close to the resolution limit of the OIB snow radar system. Our results also show a broad snow thickness distribution, indicating a large spatial variability in snow across the region. Differences between the airborne snow radar and in situ measurements fell within the standard deviation of the in situ data (0.15–0.18 m). Our results suggest that, with frequent flooding of the snow-ice interface in specific regions of the Arctic in the future, it may result in an underestimate of snow thickness or an overestimate of ice freeboard, measured from radar altimetry, thereby affecting the accuracy of sea ice thickness estimates.

In this study, we compare eight recently developed snow depth products that use satellite observations, modeling or a combination of satellite and modeling approaches. These products are further compared against various ground-truth observations, including those from ice mass balance buoys (IMBs), snow buoys, snow depth derived from NASA's Operation IceBridge (OIB) flights, as well as snow depth climatology from historical observations. Large snow depth discrepancies between the different snow depth data sets are observed over the Atlantic and Canadian Arctic sectors. Among the products evaluated, the University of Washington snow depth product (UW) produces the overall deepest spring (March-April) snow packs, while the snow product from the Danish Meteorological Institute (DMI) provide the shallowest spring snow depths. There is no significant trend in the mean snow depth among all snow products since the 2000s, despite the great differences in regional snow depth. Two products, SnowModel-LG and the NASA Eulerian Snow on Sea Ice Model (NESOSIM), also provide estimates of snow density. Arctic-wide, these density products show the expected seasonal evolution with varying inter-annual variability, and no significant trend since the 2000s. The snow density in SnowModel-LG is generally higher than climatology, whereas NESOSIM density is generally lower. Both SnowModel-LG and NESOSIM densities have a larger seasonal change than climatology. Inconsistencies in the reconstructed snow parameters among the products, as well as differences between in-situ and airborne observations can in part be attributed to differences in effective footprint and spatial/temporal coverage, as well as insufficient observations for validation/bias adjustments. Our results highlight the need for more targeted Arctic surveys over different spatial and temporal scales to allow for a more systematic comparison and fusion of airborne, in-situ and remote sensing observations.