Search

This report summarizes the presentations and discussions in the first Asian Clinical Trials Network for Cancers (ATLAS) international symposium that was held on 24 April 2022, in Bangkok, Thailand, and hosted by the National Cancer Center Hospital (NCCH), co-hosted by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), Clinical Research Malaysia (CRM) and the Thai Society of Clinical Oncology (TSCO), and supported by Embassy of Japan in Thailand. Since 2020, the NCCH has conducted the ATLAS project to enhance research environments and infrastructures to facilitate international clinical research and cancer genomic medicine in the Asian region. The purpose of the symposium was to discuss what we can achieve under the ATLAS project, to share the latest topics and common issues in cancer research and to facilitate mutual understanding. Invitees included stakeholders from academic institutions, mainly at ATLAS collaborative sites, as well as Asian regulatory authorities. The invited speakers discussed ongoing collaborative research, regulatory perspectives to improve new drug access in Asia, the status of phase I trials in Asia, the introduction of research activities at the National Cancer Center (NCC) and the implementation of genomic medicine. As the next steps after this symposium, the ATLAS project will foster increased cooperation between investigators, regulatory authorities and other stakeholders relevant to cancer research, and establish a sustainable pan-Asian cancer research group to increase the number of clinical trials and deliver novel drugs to patients with cancer in Asia.

Table S2 shows the categorization of local testing methods based on assay limit of detection compared to the cobas® EGFR Mutation Test v2

A number of genetic and epigenetic changes underlying the development of nasopharyngeal carcinomas have recently been identified. However, there is still limited information on the nature of the genes and gene products whose aberrant expression and activity promote the malignant conversion of nasopharyngeal epithelium. Here, we have performed a genome-wide transcriptome analysis by probing cDNA microarrays with fluorescent-labeled amplified RNA derived from laser capture microdissected cells procured from normal nasopharyngeal epithelium and areas of metaplasia-dysplasia and carcinoma from EBV-associated nasopharyngeal carcinomas. This approach enabled the identification of genes differentially expressed in each cell population, as well as numerous genes whose expression can help explain the aggressive clinical nature of this tumor type. For example, genes indicating cell cycle aberrations (cyclin D2, cyclin B1, activator of S-phase kinase, and the cell cycle checkpoint kinase, CHK1) and invasive-metastatic potential (matrix metalloproteinase 11, v-Ral, and integrin β4) were highly expressed in tumor cells. In contrast, genes underexpressed in tumors included genes involved in apoptosis (B-cell CLL/lymphoma 6, secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor, and calpastatin), cell structure (keratin 7 and carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 6), and putative tumor suppressor genes (H-Ras-like suppressor 3, retinoic acid receptor responder 1, and growth arrested specific 8) among others. Gene expression patterns also suggested alterations in the Wnt/β-catenin and transforming growth factor β pathways in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Thus, expression profiles indicate that aberrant expression of growth, survival, and invasion-promoting genes may contribute to the molecular pathogenesis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Ultimately, this approach may facilitate the identification of clinical useful markers of disease progression and novel potential therapeutic targets for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Supplementary Figure 1. (A) PFS in the cfDNA mut+ subgroup (B) OS in the cfDNA mut+ subgroup (C) PFS in the cfDNA mut+ subgroup (patients with no tissue result) (D) OS in the cfDNA mut+ subgroup (patients with no tissue result) (E) PFS in the cfDNA mut- subgroup (F) OS in the cfDNA mut- subgroup (G) PFS in the cfDNA mut- subgroup (no tissue result )(H) OS in the cfDNA mut- subgroup (no tissue result)

Supplementary Tables 1-4 from Global Gene Expression Profile of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma by Laser Capture Microdissection and Complementary DNA Microarrays

Supplementary Tables 1-4. Supplementary Table 1. Concordance, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of tissue and cfDNA tests (n=238) by EGFR mutation type Supplementary Table 2: EGFR mutation type Supplementary Table 3: EGFR mutation type in matched tumor and plasma samples Supplementary Table 4: Baseline characteristics in EGFR mut+ patients with only blood-based samples

Suplement_Tracked changes

Purpose: Blood-based circulating-free (cf) tumor DNA may be an alternative to tissue-based EGFR mutation testing in NSCLC. This exploratory analysis compares matched tumor and blood samples from the FASTACT-2 study.Experimental Design: Patients were randomized to receive six cycles of gemcitabine/platinum plus sequential erlotinib or placebo. EGFR mutation testing was performed using the cobas tissue test and the cobas blood test (in development). Blood samples at baseline, cycle 3, and progression were assessed for blood test detection rate, sensitivity, and specificity; concordance with matched tumor analysis (n = 238), and correlation with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).Results: Concordance between tissue and blood tests was 88%, with blood test sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 96%. Median PFS was 13.1 versus 6.0 months for erlotinib and placebo, respectively, for those with baseline EGFR mut+ cfDNA [HR, 0.22; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.14–0.33, P < 0.0001] and 6.2 versus 6.1 months, respectively, for the EGFR mut− cfDNA subgroup (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.65–1.04, P = 0.1076). For patients with EGFR mut+ cfDNA at baseline, median PFS was 7.2 versus 12.0 months for cycle 3 EGFR mut+ cfDNA versus cycle 3 EGFR mut− patients, respectively (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.21–0.48, P < 0.0001); median OS by cycle 3 status was 18.2 and 31.9 months, respectively (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.31–0.84, P = 0.0066).Conclusions: Blood-based EGFR mutation analysis is relatively sensitive and highly specific. Dynamic changes in cfDNA EGFR mutation status relative to baseline may predict clinical outcomes. Clin Cancer Res; 21(14); 3196–203. ©2015 AACR.

Purpose:To assess the utility of the cobas EGFR Mutation Test, with tissue and plasma, for first-line osimertinib therapy for patients with EGFR-mutated (EGFRm; Ex19del and/or L858R) advanced or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from the FLAURA study (NCT02296125).Experimental Design:Tumor tissue EGFRm status was determined at screening using the central cobas tissue test or a local tissue test. Baseline circulating tumor (ct)DNA EGFRm status was retrospectively determined with the central cobas plasma test.Results:Of 994 patients screened, 556 were randomized (289 and 267 with central and local EGFR test results, respectively) and 438 failed screening. Of those randomized from local EGFR test results, 217 patients had available central test results; 211/217 (97%) were retrospectively confirmed EGFRm positive by central cobas tissue test. Using reference central cobas tissue test results, positive percent agreements with cobas plasma test results for Ex19del and L858R detection were 79% [95% confidence interval (CI), 74–84] and 68% (95% CI, 61–75), respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) superiority with osimertinib over comparator EGFR-TKI remained consistent irrespective of randomization route (central/local EGFRm-positive tissue test). In both treatment arms, PFS was prolonged in plasma ctDNA EGFRm-negative (23.5 and 15.0 months) versus -positive patients (15.2 and 9.7 months).Conclusions:Our results support utility of cobas tissue and plasma testing to aid selection of patients with EGFRm advanced NSCLC for first-line osimertinib treatment. Lack of EGFRm detection in plasma was associated with prolonged PFS versus patients plasma EGFRm positive, potentially due to patients having lower tumor burden.

Introduction The Blood First Assay Screening Trial is an ongoing open-label, multicohort study, prospectively evaluating the relationship between blood-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) detection of actionable genetic alterations and activity of targeted therapies or immunotherapy in treatment-naive advanced or metastatic NSCLC. We present data from the ALK-positive cohort. Methods Patients aged more than or equal to 18 years with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC and ALK rearrangements detected by blood-based NGS using hybrid capture technology (FoundationACT) received alectinib 600 mg twice daily. Asymptomatic or treated central nervous system (CNS) metastases were permitted. Primary end point was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1). Secondary end points were independent review facility-assessed ORR, duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. Exploratory end points were investigator-assessed ORR in patients with baseline CNS metastases and relationship between circulating biomarkers and response. Results In total, 2219 patients were screened and blood-based NGS yielded results in 98.6% of the cases. Of these, 119 patients (5.4%) had ALK-positive disease; 87 were enrolled and received alectinib. Median follow-up was 12.6 months (range: 2.6–18.7). Confirmed ORR was 87.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78.5–93.5) by investigator and 92.0% (95% CI: 84.1–96.7) by independent review facility. Investigator-confirmed 12-month duration of response was 75.9% (95% CI: 63.6–88.2). In 35 patients (40%) with baseline CNS disease, investigator-assessed ORR was 91.4% (95% CI: 76.9–98.2). Median PFS was not reached; 12-month investigator-assessed PFS was 78.4% (95% CI: 69.1–87.7). Safety data were consistent with the known tolerability profile of alectinib. Conclusions These results reveal the clinical application of blood-based NGS as a method to inform clinical decision-making in ALK-positive NSCLC.

Background Trastuzumab-dkst is a biosimilar of trastuzumab. The phase 3 HERITAGE trial demonstrated equivalent overall response rate (ORR) with trastuzumab-dkst or originator trastuzumab at 24 weeks in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer receiving chemotherapy. We now present the correlation of ORR with progression-free survival (PFS) for maintenance monotherapy with trastuzumab-dkst vs trastuzumab at 48 weeks of treatment, and the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity. Methods HERITAGE is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, phase 3 study. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive trastuzumab-dkst or trastuzumab in combination with taxane followed by continued monotherapy until disease progression. The analysis included PFS at 48 weeks to support the primary efficacy endpoint of ORR and safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of trastuzumab-dkst vs trastuzumab as maintenance monotherapy. Results Of 500 randomized patients, 342 entered the monotherapy phase; 214 patients received ≥48 weeks of treatment. There were no statistically significant differences between PFS, ORR, or interim overall survival at week 48 between trastuzumab-dkst and trastuzumab. Week 24 ORR was highly correlated with week 48 PFS (rb = 0.75). Cumulative treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious AEs were similar in both groups, with few grade ≥3 TEAEs. Immunogenicity was low and similar in both groups at 48 weeks. Conclusion The correlation between ORR and PFS supports the design of first-line metastatic trials assessing biosimilar trastuzumab. Overall, trastuzumab-dkst and trastuzumab were well tolerated with similar efficacy, including ORR and PFS, in combination with a taxane followed by monotherapy., Highlights • Trastuzumab-dkst is a biosimilar of trastuzumab. • Trastuzumab-dkst and trastuzumab had similar PFS, ORR, and OS at week 48. • Results support therapeutic equivalence between trastuzumab-dkst and trastuzumab. • Week 24 ORR was highly correlated with week 48 PFS. • ORR and PFS correlation supports ORR as a valid endpoint in clinical trials for MBC.

Summary Background PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors are active in metastatic urothelial carcinoma, but positive randomised data supporting their use as a first-line treatment are lacking. In this study we assessed outcomes with first-line pembrolizumab alone or combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for patients with previously untreated advanced urothelial carcinoma. Methods KEYNOTE-361 is a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial of patients aged at least 18 years, with untreated, locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of up to 2. Eligible patients were enrolled from 201 medical centres in 21 countries and randomly allocated (1:1:1) via an interactive voice-web response system to intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks for a maximum of 35 cycles plus intravenous chemotherapy (gemcitabine [1000 mg/m2] on days 1 and 8 and investigator's choice of cisplatin [70 mg/m2] or carboplatin [area under the curve 5] on day 1 of every 3-week cycle) for a maximum of six cycles, pembrolizumab alone, or chemotherapy alone, stratified by choice of platinum therapy and PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS). Neither patients nor investigators were masked to the treatment assignment or CPS. At protocol-specified final analysis, sequential hypothesis testing began with superiority of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the total population (all patients randomly allocated to a treatment) for the dual primary endpoints of progression-free survival (p value boundary 0·0019), assessed by masked, independent central review, and overall survival (p value boundary 0·0142), followed by non-inferiority and superiority of overall survival for pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in the patient population with CPS of at least 10 and in the total population (also a primary endpoint). Safety was assessed in the as-treated population (all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment). This study is completed and is no longer enrolling patients, and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT02853305 . Findings Between Oct 19, 2016 and June 29, 2018, 1010 patients were enrolled and allocated to receive pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (n=351), pembrolizumab monotherapy (n=307), or chemotherapy alone (n=352). Median follow-up was 31·7 months (IQR 27·7–36·0). Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy did not significantly improve progression-free survival, with a median progression-free survival of 8·3 months (95% CI 7·5–8·5) in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group versus 7·1 months (6·4–7·9) in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·78, 95% CI 0·65–0·93; p=0·0033), or overall survival, with a median overall survival of 17·0 months (14·5–19·5) in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group versus 14·3 months (12·3–16·7) in the chemotherapy group (0·86, 0·72–1·02; p=0·0407). No further formal statistical hypothesis testing was done. In analyses of overall survival with pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy (now exploratory based on hierarchical statistical testing), overall survival was similar between these treatment groups, both in the total population (15·6 months [95% CI 12·1–17·9] with pembrolizumab vs 14·3 months [12·3–16·7] with chemotherapy; HR 0·92, 95% CI 0·77–1·11) and the population with CPS of at least 10 (16·1 months [13·6–19·9] with pembrolizumab vs 15·2 months [11·6–23·3] with chemotherapy; 1·01, 0·77–1·32). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse event attributed to study treatment was anaemia with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (104 [30%] of 349 patients) or chemotherapy alone (112 [33%] of 342 patients), and diarrhoea, fatigue, and hyponatraemia (each affecting four [1%] of 302 patients) with pembrolizumab alone. Six (1%) of 1010 patients died due to an adverse event attributed to study treatment; two patients in each treatment group. One each occurred due to cardiac arrest and device-related sepsis in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group, one each due to cardiac failure and malignant neoplasm progression in the pembrolizumab group, and one each due to myocardial infarction and ischaemic colitis in the chemotherapy group. Interpretation The addition of pembrolizumab to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy did not significantly improve efficacy and should not be widely adopted for treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma. Funding Merck Sharp and Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Background Bevacizumab is an antiangiogenic recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits tumor growth. FKB238, a bevacizumab biosimilar, has analytical pharmacokinetic and safety profiles similar to those of bevacizumab. Objective This phase III trial (NCT02810457) compared the efficacy and safety of FKB238 with that of bevacizumab in patients with advanced/recurrent non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (non-sq-NSCLC). Methods This global, multicenter, double-blind, parallel, randomized, comparative clinical trial enrolled and randomized patients with advanced/recurrent non-sq-NSCLC to receive intravenous infusions of either FKB238 15 mg/kg or bevacizumab 15 mg/kg. All patients received intravenous infusions of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and carboplatin (area under the curve 6.0) immediately prior to investigational products for 4–6 cycles. FKB238 and bevacizumab were administered on day 1 of each 21-day cycle until objective progressive disease by RECIST version 1.1 or other discontinuation criteria were met. The primary efficacy endpoint was overall response rate (ORR), including complete and partial response and based on blinded independent central review assessment. Other efficacy determinations included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and immunogenicity. Adverse events and severity were reported. Results The ORR for the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (N = 731) was 51.6% in the FKB238 arm (N = 364) and 53.7% in the bevacizumab arm (N = 367). The FKB238:bevacizumab ORR ratio (ITT population) was 0.96 (90% confidence interval [CI] 0.86–1.08), and the difference in ORR (per-protocol set) between FKB238 and bevacizumab was − 0.02 (95% CI − 0.09 to 0.06). Both CIs fell within the prespecified equivalence margins. Estimated median PFS was 7.72 and 7.62 months in the FKB238 and bevacizumab arms, respectively (hazard ratio 0.97; 95% CI 0.82–1.16). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported for 94.2% and 95.1% of patients in the FKB238 and bevacizumab arms, respectively. Grade 3 or higher TEAEs were reported for 53.6% and 55.5% of patients in the FKB238 and bevacizumab arms, respectively. Serious TEAEs were reported for 25.1% and 26.0% of patients treated with FKB238 and bevacizumab, respectively. Conclusions Efficacy equivalence was demonstrated between the two drugs, and safety profiles were similar. There were no meaningful differences in efficacy and safety between FKB238 or bevacizumab in patients with non-sq-NSCLC. Trial registration number NCT02810457.

Purpose The phase 3 HERITAGE trial demonstrated that the biosimilar trastuzumab-dkst is well tolerated with similar efficacy (measured by overall response rate [ORR] and progression-free survival [PFS]) compared with originator trastuzumab combined with taxane followed by monotherapy in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Herein, we present final overall survival (OS) from HERITAGE. Methods HERITAGE is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive trastuzumab-dkst or trastuzumab plus taxane followed by continued monotherapy until disease progression. Overall survival was to be assessed at 36 months or after 240 deaths, whichever occurred first, as observed from time of randomization of last patient. Results At the final analysis (36 months), 242 patients in the intention-to-treat population had died during the study: 116 and 124 in the trastuzumab-dkst and trastuzumab groups, respectively, and 1 untreated patient from each treatment group. Median OS by Kaplan–Meier analysis was 35.0 months with trastuzumab-dkst and 30.2 months with trastuzumab. Evaluation of PFS showed a median of 11.1 months in both treatment groups. No new safety concerns were reported from week 48 until the end of the survival follow-up. Conclusion This is the first phase 3 trial of a trastuzumab biosimilar to report long-term survival data similar to originator trastuzumab in patients with MBC. The comparable long-term OS between the trastuzumab-dkst and originator trastuzumab groups further supports the similarity of trastuzumab-dkst with originator trastuzumab and establishes trastuzumab-dkst as a safe and effective treatment option for patients with HER2-positive MBC. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02472964; 6/16/2015

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in systemic therapy and improvements in survival for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), brain metastasis (BM) remains a poor outcome. Previous studies on risk factors for BM occurrence included unselected patients and biomarker prediction of BM in these populations were not well studied. We aimed to identify the role of epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) marker and clinical factors predicting BM in EGFR: mutant NSCLC patients. METHODS: Advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients in the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital from January 2013 to December 2017 were included. Vimentin expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. The correlation between vimentin expression and factors associated with BM occurrence was analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: 304 patients were enrolled. Of these, 149 patients (49%) developed BM. In multivariate analysis, the occurrence of BM was associated with age

We aimed to examine cemiplimab, a programmed cell death 1 inhibitor, in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) of at least 50%.In EMPOWER-Lung 1, a multicentre, open-label, global, phase 3 study, eligible patients recruited in 138 clinics from 24 countries (aged ≥18 years with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1; never-smokers were ineligible) were randomly assigned (1:1) to cemiplimab 350 mg every 3 weeks or platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Crossover from chemotherapy to cemiplimab was allowed following disease progression. Primary endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival per masked independent review committee. Primary endpoints were assessed in the intention-to-treat population and in a prespecified PD-L1 of at least 50% population (per US Food and Drug Administration request to the sponsor), which consisted of patients with PD-L1 of at least 50% per 22C3 assay done according to instructions for use. Adverse events were assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the assigned treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03088540 and is ongoing.Between June 27, 2017 and Feb 27, 2020, 710 patients were randomly assigned (intention-to-treat population). In the PD-L1 of at least 50% population, which consisted of 563 patients, median overall survival was not reached (95% CI 17·9-not evaluable) with cemiplimab (n=283) versus 14·2 months (11·2-17·5) with chemotherapy (n=280; hazard ratio [HR] 0·57 [0·42-0·77]; p=0·0002). Median progression-free survival was 8·2 months (6·1-8·8) with cemiplimab versus 5·7 months (4·5-6·2) with chemotherapy (HR 0·54 [0·43-0·68]; p0·0001). Significant improvements in overall survival and progression-free survival were also observed with cemiplimab in the intention-to-treat population despite a high crossover rate (74%). Grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 98 (28%) of 355 patients treated with cemiplimab and 135 (39%) of 342 patients treated with chemotherapy.Cemiplimab monotherapy significantly improved overall survival and progression-free survival compared with chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 of at least 50%, providing a potential new treatment option for this patient population.Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi.

Angiosarcoma (AS) is a rare disease with a dismal prognosis. The treatment landscape and prognostic factors for advanced AS, including locally advanced, unresectable, and metastatic disease remain elusive. The Asian Sarcoma Consortium is an international collaborative effort to understand the sarcoma treatment landscape in Asia. We undertook a retrospective chart review of AS patients seen in 8 sarcoma academic centers across Asia. Patients with complete clinical, treatment, and follow‐up data were enrolled. Overall, 276 advanced AS patients were included into this study; 84 (30%) of the patients had metachronous metastatic AS. The median age was 67 y; primary sites of AS was cutaneous in 55% and visceral in 45% of patients. In total, 143 (52%) patients received at least 1 line of systemic chemotherapy. The most common first‐line chemotherapy regimen used was paclitaxel (47.6%) followed by liposomal doxorubicin (19.6%). The median overall survival (OS) was 7.8 mo. Significant prognostic factors for OS included age > 65 (hazard ratio (HR) 1.54, P = .006), male gender (HR 1.39, P = .02), and a cutaneous primary AS site (HR 0.63, P = .004). The median progression‐free survival (PFS) for first‐line chemotherapy was 3.4 mo. PFS for single vs combination or paclitaxel vs liposomal doxorubicin chemotherapy regimens were comparable. This study provides an insight into the treatment patterns and prognostic factors of advanced AS patients in Asia. Prognosis of advanced AS remains poor. Data from this study serve as a benchmark for future clinical study design., With a total of 276 advanced angiosarcoma patients, we provided the complete clinicopathological demographics, treatment patterns, and prognostic outcomes of advanced angiosarcoma in Asia.

The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib has demonstrated efficacy and a manageable safety profile in combination with endocrine therapy in women with oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) in international phase 3 trials. The phase 3 PALOMA-4 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of palbociclib plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole in Asian women with ER+/HER2- ABC.Postmenopausal women (n = 340) with no prior systemic treatment for advanced disease were randomised 1:1 to palbociclib (125 mg/d orally; 3 weeks on, 1 week off) plus letrozole (2.5 mg/d orally; continuously) or placebo plus letrozole. The primary end-point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end-points included tumour response and safety.Median (95% CI) PFS was 21.5 (16.6-24.9) months with palbociclib plus letrozole and 13.9 (13.7-16.6) months with placebo plus letrozole (hazard ratio, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.53-0.87]; P = 0.0012). Consistent with the established safety profile, the most common adverse events (AEs) with palbociclib plus letrozole were neutropenia, leukopenia, thrombocytopaenia, and anaemia. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was reported in 84.5% of patients in the palbociclib arm versus 1.2% in the placebo arm. One serious AE of febrile neutropenia in the palbociclib group was reported.Findings from PALOMA-4 support the efficacy and safety of first-line palbociclib plus letrozole in postmenopausal Asian women with ER+/HER2- ABC. No new safety concerns of palbociclib plus letrozole were identified.Clinicaltrials. gov, NCT02297438.

Purpose Previous report from the ASCEND-8 trial showed consistent efficacy with less gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged (ALK+) advanced/metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with ceritinib 450-mg with food compared with 750-mg fasted. In this subgroup analysis, we report outcomes in Asian patients of the ASCEND-8 trial.Materials and Methods Key efficacy endpoints were blinded independent review committee (BIRC)–assessed overall response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) evaluated per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1. Other efficacy endpoints were investigator-assessed ORR and DOR; BIRC- and investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and disease control rate; overall survival (OS). Safety was evaluated by frequency and severity of adverse events.Results At final data cutoff (6 March 2020), 198 treatment-naïve patients were included in efficacy analysis, of which 74 (37%) comprised the Asian subset; 450-mg fed (n=29), 600-mg fed (n=19), and 750-mg fasted (n=26). Baseline characteristics were mostly comparable across study arms. At baseline, more patients in 450-mg fed arm (44.8%) had brain metastases than in 750-mg fasted arm (26.9%). Per BIRC, patients in the 450-mg fed arm had a numerically higher ORR, 24-month DOR rate and 24-month PFS rate than the 750-mg fasted arm. The 36-month OS rate was 93.1% in 450-mg fed arm and 70.9% in 750-mg fasted arm. Any-grade GI toxicity occurred in 82.8% and 96.2% of patients in the 450-mg fed and 750-mg fasted arms, respectively.Conclusion Asian patients with ALK+ advanced/metastatic NSCLC treated with ceritinib 450-mg fed showed numerically higher efficacy and lower GI toxicity than 750-mg fasted patients.

Lymph node involvement is one of the important prognostic factors for early-stage lung cancer. However, in lymph node-negative (N0) lung cancer the recurrent rate may be as high as 30%. We aimed to study potential prognostic factors including clinicopathological factors and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status in this lung cancer population.We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and pathological examinations of patients with completely resected N0 pulmonary adenocarcinoma treated in our institute between 2009 and 2016. We used CobasWe recruited 220 patients with median duration of follow up 5 years. Majority of these patients were in stage I (80%) and did not receive adjuvant therapy (86%). There were 53% with EGFR mutations which comprised of exon 19 deletion 51% and L858R 43%. Recurrence occurred in 64 out of 220 patients (29%). The median time to recurrence was 2.1 years. Statistically significant prognostic factors in both univariate and multivariate analyses included tumor size ≥4 centimeter (cm) (HR: 1.94; 95% CI: 1.03-3.67), visceral pleural invasion (HR: 2.53; 95% CI: 1.34-4.79), tumor necrosis (HR: 2.45; 95% CI: 1.13-5.31) and bronchial resection margin2 cm (HR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.10-3.51). However, presence of sensitizing EGFR mutation was not found to be a significant prognostic factor (HR: 1.20; 95% CI: 0.66-2.18; P=0.56).In N0 surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma, there were significant pathological prognostic factors including tumor 4 cm or more, visceral pleural invasion, tumor necrosis and bronchial resection margin less than 2 cm. Mutation of EGFR is not a significant prognostic factor to determine the risk of recurrence in this population and their risks shall be determined by the other poor prognostic factors.

BACKGROUND: Pembrolizumab is active in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression associated with improved response.METHODS: KEYNOTE-048 was a randomised, phase 3 study of participants with untreated locally incurable recurrent or metastatic HNSCC done at 200 sites in 37 countries. Participants were stratified by PD-L1 expression, p16 status, and performance status and randomly allocated (1:1:1) to pembrolizumab alone, pembrolizumab plus a platinum and 5-fluorouracil (pembrolizumab with chemotherapy), or cetuximab plus a platinum and 5-fluorouracil (cetuximab with chemotherapy). Investigators and participants were aware of treatment assignment. Investigators, participants, and representatives of the sponsor were masked to the PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) results; PD-L1 positivity was not required for study entry. The primary endpoints were overall survival (time from randomisation to death from any cause) and progression-free survival (time from randomisation to radiographically confirmed disease progression or death from any cause, whichever came first) in the intention-to-treat population (all participants randomly allocated to a treatment group). There were 14 primary hypotheses: superiority of pembrolizumab alone and of pembrolizumab with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for overall survival and progression-free survival in the PD-L1 CPS of 20 or more, CPS of 1 or more, and total populations and non-inferiority (non-inferiority margin: 1·2) of pembrolizumab alone and pembrolizumab with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for overall survival in the total population. The definitive findings for each hypothesis were obtained when statistical testing was completed for that hypothesis; this occurred at the second interim analysis for 11 hypotheses and at final analysis for three hypotheses. Safety was assessed in the as-treated population (all participants who received at least one dose of allocated treatment). This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02358031.FINDINGS: Between April 20, 2015, and Jan 17, 2017, 882 participants were allocated to receive pembrolizumab alone (n=301), pembrolizumab with chemotherapy (n=281), or cetuximab with chemotherapy (n=300); of these, 754 (85%) had CPS of 1 or more and 381 (43%) had CPS of 20 or more. At the second interim analysis, pembrolizumab alone improved overall survival versus cetuximab with chemotherapy in the CPS of 20 or more population (median 14·9 months vs 10·7 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0·61 [95% CI 0·45-0·83], p=0·0007) and CPS of 1 or more population (12·3 vs 10·3, 0·78 [0·64-0·96], p=0·0086) and was non-inferior in the total population (11·6 vs 10·7, 0·85 [0·71-1·03]). Pembrolizumab with chemotherapy improved overall survival versus cetuximab with chemotherapy in the total population (13·0 months vs 10·7 months, HR 0·77 [95% CI 0·63-0·93], p=0·0034) at the second interim analysis and in the CPS of 20 or more population (14·7 vs 11·0, 0·60 [0·45-0·82], p=0·0004) and CPS of 1 or more population (13·6 vs 10·4, 0·65 [0·53-0·80], pINTERPRETATION: Based on the observed efficacy and safety, pembrolizumab plus platinum and 5-fluorouracil is an appropriate first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic HNSCC and pembrolizumab monotherapy is an appropriate first-line treatment for PD-L1-positive recurrent or metastatic HNSCC.FUNDING: Merck Sharp & Dohme.

Purpose: To assess the utility of the cobas EGFR Mutation Test, with tissue and plasma, for first-line osimertinib therapy for patients with EGFR-mutated (EGFRm; Ex19del and/or L858R) advanced or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from the FLAURA study (NCT02296125). Experimental Design: Tumor tissue EGFRm status was determined at screening using the central cobas tissue test or a local tissue test. Baseline circulating tumor (ct)DNA EGFRm status was retrospectively determined with the central cobas plasma test. Results: Of 994 patients screened, 556 were randomized (289 and 267 with central and local EGFR test results, respectively) and 438 failed screening. Of those randomized from local EGFR test results, 217 patients had available central test results; 211/217 (97%) were retrospectively confirmed EGFRm positive by central cobas tissue test. Using reference central cobas tissue test results, positive percent agreements with cobas plasma test results for Ex19del and L858R detection were 79% [95% confidence interval (CI), 74–84] and 68% (95% CI, 61–75), respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) superiority with osimertinib over comparator EGFR-TKI remained consistent irrespective of randomization route (central/local EGFRm-positive tissue test). In both treatment arms, PFS was prolonged in plasma ctDNA EGFRm-negative (23.5 and 15.0 months) versus -positive patients (15.2 and 9.7 months). Conclusions: Our results support utility of cobas tissue and plasma testing to aid selection of patients with EGFRm advanced NSCLC for first-line osimertinib treatment. Lack of EGFRm detection in plasma was associated with prolonged PFS versus patients plasma EGFRm positive, potentially due to patients having lower tumor burden.

Background First-line pembrolizumab monotherapy improves overall and progression-free survival in patients with untreated metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer with a programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumour proportion score (TPS) of 50% or greater. We investigated overall survival after treatment with pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with a PD-L1 TPS of 1% or greater. Methods This randomised, open-label, phase 3 study was done in 213 medical centres in 32 countries. Eligible patients were adults (≥18 years) with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer without a sensitising EGFR mutation or ALK translocation and with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0 or 1, life expectancy 3 months or longer, and a PD-L1 TPS of 1% or greater. Randomisation was computer generated, accessed via an interactive voice-response and integrated web-response system, and stratified by region of enrolment (east Asia vs rest of world), ECOG performance status score (0 vs 1), histology (squamous vs non-squamous), and PD-L1 TPS (≥50% vs 1-49%). Enrolled patients were randomly assigned 1:1 in blocks of four per stratum to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles or the investigator's choice of platinum-based chemotherapy for four to six cycles. Primary endpoints were overall survival in patients with a TPS of 50% or greater, 20% or greater, and 1% or greater (one-sided significance thresholds, p=0·0122, p=0·0120, and p=0·0124, respectively) in the intention-to-treat population, assessed sequentially if the previous findings were significant. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02220894. Findings From Dec 19, 2014, to March 6, 2017, 1274 patients (902 men, 372 women, median age 63 years [IQR 57-69]) with a PD-L1 TPS of 1% or greater were allocated to pembrolizumab (n=637) or chemotherapy (n=637) and included in the intention-to-treat population. 599 (47%) had a TPS of 50% or greater and 818 patients (64%) had a TPS of 20% or greater. As of Feb 26, 2018, median follow-up was 12·8 months. Overall survival was significantly longer in the pembrolizumab group than in the chemotherapy group in all three TPS populations (≥50% hazard ratio 0·69, 95% CI 0·56-0·85, p=0·0003; ≥20% 0·77, 0·64-0·92, p=0·0020, and ≥1% 0·81, 0·71-0·93, p=0·0018). The median surival values by TPS population were 20·0 months (95% CI 15·4-24·9) for pembrolizumab versus 12·2 months (10·4-14·2) for chemotherapy, 17·7 months (15·3-22·1) versus 13·0 months (11·6-15·3), and 16·7 months (13·9-19·7) versus 12·1 months (11·3-13·3), respectively. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse occurred in 113 (18%) of 636 treated patients in the pembrolizumab group and in 252 (41%) of 615 in the chemotherapy group and led to death in 13 (2%) and 14 (2%) patients, respectively. Interpretation The benefit-to-risk profile suggests that pembrolizumab monotherapy can be extended as first-line therapy to patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer without sensitising EGFR or ALK alterations and with low PD-L1 TPS. Funding Merck Sharp & Dohme.

Background:Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), one of immunological biomarkers have been investigated in breast cancer and other cancers. High levels of TILs or lymphocyte-predominant breast cancer subgroup (LPBC) were associated with better prognosis in HER2 positive and triple negative breast cancers from various studies. Recently, TILs is also the predictive biomarker for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clinical utility of TILs has been recommended in routine clinical practice for breast cancer patients. However, limitation of TILs in HER2 positive women in Thai ethnicity was reported. So, the aim of this study was to evaluate TILs in combination with clinical values as the prognostic value for predicting the recurrent breast cancer in Thai population. Methods: Four hundred and eighty-six patients with early stage HER-2 positive breast cancer who were diagnosed and treated at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital from January 2005 to December 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. Clinico-pathological features, stromal TILs classified as low, intermediate and high, and survival outcomes were analyzed. Results: The median age was 52 years (26-85). Of the 486 HER2 positive women, 56% had postmenopause, 54.5% had T2 tumor, 47.7% had node negative, 66.8% had stage I-II, 44.6% had lymphovascular invasion, and 47.5% had positive hormonal receptor. For the primary treatment, 67.3% underwent modified radical mastectomy, 96.5% received neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy, 69.7% received adjuvant trastuzumab, 46.7% received adjuvant hormonal therapy. In 92 recurrent patients (18.9%), distant metastasis was identified in 67.4%. In 100 available tissues for evaluating stromal TILs, only 14 (14%) had high stromal TILs (at least 50%) and 46 patients (46%) had recurrent disease. Twenty three of 39 (59%)in low stromal TILs group had disease recurrence while only 4 out of 14 (28.6%) in high stromal TILs had recurrent disease. Median percentage of stromal TILs in recurrent and non-recurrent group was 17.5% and 27.5%, respectively. From multivariate analysis, high stromal TILs (HR 0.52 [95%CI 0.32-0.85]; p = 0.01) and trastuzumab used (HR 0.39 [95%CI 0.25-0.61]; p Conclusion: High stromal TILs and trastuzumab used were statistically significant prognostic values for predicting disease recurrence in HER-2 positive early breast cancer. Stromal TILs together with clinical values established clinical utility in Thai HER2 positive breast cancer women. Level of Stromal TILs in Overall PatientsStromal TILsTotal (n = 100)No recurrence (n = 54)Recurrence (n = 46)P valueLow (0-15%)39(39%)16(41%)23(59%)0.03Intermediate (20-40%)47(47%)28(59.6%)19(40.4%) LPBC (50-90%)14(14%)10(71.4%)4(28.6%) Citation Format: Prapatsornvichit S, Atikankul T, Sriuranpong V, Poovorawan N, Parinyanitikul N. Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and clinical values for prediction of breast cancer recurrence in HER2 positive early breast cancer after surgery in King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-08-46.

James C Yao,1 Do-Youn Oh,2 Jiaming Qian,3 Young Suk Park,4 Fabian Herbst,5 Antonia Ridolfi,6 Miguel Izquierdo,5 Tetsuhide Ito,7 Liqun Jia,8 Izumi Komoto,9 Virote Sriuranpong,10 Yasuhiro Shimada11 1Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; 2Department of Medical Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; 3Department of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China; 4Department of Hematology and Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea; 5Novartis Oncology, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland; 6Novartis Oncology, Novartis Pharma S.A.S, Rueil-Malmaison, Paris, France; 7Department of Gastroenterology, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan; 8Department of Medical Oncology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China; 9Department of Surgery, Kansai Electric Power Hospital, Osaka, Japan; 10Department of Medical Oncology, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand; 11Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan Background: In RADIANT-4, everolimus showed an improvement of 7.1 months in median progression-free survival (PFS) vs placebo among patients with advanced, well-differentiated, nonfunctional neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of gastrointestinal (GI) or lung origin. The present analysis focuses on the effect of everolimus on the East Asian-subgroup population of the RADIANT-4 study. Methods: Patients were randomized to receive everolimus 10 mg/day or matching placebo. The primary end point was PFS (central review). Secondary end points were overall response rate, safety, and tolerability. Results: Among 302 patients enrolled in RADIANT-4, 46 were included in the East Asian subgroup (everolimus, n=28; placebo, n=18) analysis. Everolimus was associated with an 82% reduction in the relative risk of disease progression or death (HR 0.18, 95% CI 0.09–0.38). The median PFS (central review) in this subgroup was 11.2 months with everolimus vs 3.1 months with placebo. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in all 28 patients treated with everolimus and ten patients receiving placebo. The majority of these AEs were grade 1 or 2. Most commonly reported (≥30% of incidence) drug-related AEs of any grade included stomatitis (75%, n=21) and rash (43%, n=12) in the everolimus arm. Conclusion: Everolimus demonstrated a clinically meaningful PFS benefit in the East Asian population. The safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile of everolimus. These results support the use of everolimus in the East Asian population with advanced, nonfunctional NETs of GI or lung origin. Keywords: mTOR inhibitors, everolimus, RADIANT-4, neuroendocrine tumors, East Asian population

e13517 Background: Data on safety of COVID-19 vaccination in malignancy patients, particularly those receiving cancer treatment, is lacking because they are excluded from vaccine trials. We aimed to evaluate vaccine-related adverse events (VRAEs) in actively treated cancer patients. Methods: This prospective, observational study of VRAEs following ChAdOx1-nCoV-19 vaccine among 399 solid malignancy patients on active cancer treatment was conducted in two Thai academic hospitals. Participants received the first dose between June 18 and July 27, 2021 and the second dose at 8-10 weeks later. Solicited and unsolicited VRAEs were collected using questionnaires. The primary endpoint was incidence of VRAEs among solid cancer patients, as compared to healthy controls. Results: 399 cancer patients received cancer treatments during the first dose of vaccine (43% chemotherapy, 34% targeted therapy, 8% immunotherapy, 4% hormonal therapy and 11% combination regimen) and 359 patients continuing the treatments during the second dose. Mean age of the cancer patients was significantly higher than the healthy volunteers (59 +/- 13 vs 48 +/- 13 years, P < 0.001). In overall population, incidence of VRAEs was significantly lower in cancer patients than in healthy controls (57% vs 80%, P < 0.001 in overall periods, 63% vs 93%, P < 0.001 after first dose; and 51% vs 66%, P 0.01 after second dose). In age-matched comparison including 76 cancer patients and 75 healthy volunteers, the incidence of VRAEs in cancer patients was significantly lower than healthy controls only after the first dose (82% vs 93%, P 0.03) but not after the second dose (64% vs 67%, P 0.77) and overall periods (74% vs 79%, P 0.32). There was no significant difference in severity of VRAEs between two groups following the first and second dose. In all patients of cancer cohort, the most common VRAEs were pain at injection site (first dose 39%, second dose 30%), fatigue (first dose 38%, second dose 27%) and myalgia (first dose 33%, second dose 23%). The most common grade 3 VRAEs was fatigue (1%) after the first dose and tenderness at injection site (2%) after the second dose. Fever was the only VRAEs led to interrupting the cancer treatment in two cases (0.5%). Among the cancer treatment types, patients who received a chemotherapy-containing regimen had a lower risk of VRAEs than those who received a non-chemotherapy regimen (odd ratio (OR) 0.2, P 0.001 after first dose and OR 0.4, P 0.001 after second dose). Conclusions: In age-matched comparison,the overall incidence of VRAEs in actively treated patients with solid malignancy following ChAdOx1-nCoV-19 vaccine was comparable to healthy controls. Most occurred VRAEs are mild severity and rarely interfered the cancer treatment. These findings assure that Covid-19 vaccination is safe in cancer patients undergoing treatment.

12099 Background: Hypersensitivity reaction (HSR) is a common toxicity in patients receiving repeated oxaliplatin. Oxaliplatin induced HSR could be severe and results in treatment discontinuation. There is no standard recommendation for prevention of oxaliplatin induced HSR. Methods: We conducted a prospective, single center, open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing the standard premedication and 2-hour infusion protocol to the additional antihistamine premedication, intravenous chlorpheniramine, and 3-hour infusion protocol. After three months of chemotherapy, the randomization was done at 5thand 7th cycles of 3-week and 2-week oxaliplatin based regimens, respectively. The primary endpoint was the incidence of HSR. Results: From July 2020 to March 2021, a total of 160 patients underwent randomization (80 patients in both intervention and control groups). After 11 months follow-up, all patients had completed planned treatment cycles. HSRs occurred in 1 (1.3 %) and 10 (12.5%) patients in intervention and control groups, respectively, p = 0.005). There were 6 (7.5%) patients with more than grade 1 HSRs in control groups, but none in intervention group. In the intervention group, one patient with HSR experienced grade 1 erythema and palpitation. There is no report of significant adverse event from anti-histamine premedication or oxaliplatin infusion prolongation. Conclusions: Additional antihistamine premedication and infusion prolongation started in 2nd half of treatment course can significantly reduced HSR incidence in patients receiving oxaliplatin. Clinical trial information: TCTR20210506001.