Search

Objectives: Wake-up Stroke (WUS) accounts for about 25% of all ischemic strokes. Differences according to sex in the WUS subgroup has been poorly investigated so far, so we aimed to assess these differences by differentiating the enrolled population based on treatment administered.We retrospectively analysed clinical and imaging data of WUS patients admitted to our hospital between November 2013 and December 2018 dividing them in two groups: rTPA-treated and non-rTPA treated group. To point out outcome differences we evaluated: NIHSS at 7 days or at discharge, mRS at discharge and ΔNIHSS.We enrolled 149 WUS patients, 74 rTPA treated and 75 non-rTPA treated. Among rTPA treated patients, time from last known well (LKW) to Emergency Department (ED) admission was longer in females than males (610 vs 454 min), while females had a higher ΔNIHSS than males (5 vs 3). Finally, among non-rTPA treated patients, females were older than males (85 vs 79 years), had a higher pre-admission mRS (although very low in both cases), had a longer length of stay (17 vs 13 days) and shown a higher NIHSS at discharge (4 vs 2) compared to males.Females not receiving thrombolytic treatment had worse functional outcome than males, showing a higher NIHSS at discharge but, in contrast, when treated with rTPA they showed better neurological recovery as measured by a greater ΔNIHSS. We emphasize the importance of a prompt recognition of WUS in females since they seem to benefit more from rTPA treatment.Materials & methods: Wake-up Stroke (WUS) accounts for about 25% of all ischemic strokes. Differences according to sex in the WUS subgroup has been poorly investigated so far, so we aimed to assess these differences by differentiating the enrolled population based on treatment administered.We retrospectively analysed clinical and imaging data of WUS patients admitted to our hospital between November 2013 and December 2018 dividing them in two groups: rTPA-treated and non-rTPA treated group. To point out outcome differences we evaluated: NIHSS at 7 days or at discharge, mRS at discharge and ΔNIHSS.We enrolled 149 WUS patients, 74 rTPA treated and 75 non-rTPA treated. Among rTPA treated patients, time from last known well (LKW) to Emergency Department (ED) admission was longer in females than males (610 vs 454 min), while females had a higher ΔNIHSS than males (5 vs 3). Finally, among non-rTPA treated patients, females were older than males (85 vs 79 years), had a higher pre-admission mRS (although very low in both cases), had a longer length of stay (17 vs 13 days) and shown a higher NIHSS at discharge (4 vs 2) compared to males.Females not receiving thrombolytic treatment had worse functional outcome than males, showing a higher NIHSS at discharge but, in contrast, when treated with rTPA they showed better neurological recovery as measured by a greater ΔNIHSS. We emphasize the importance of a prompt recognition of WUS in females since they seem to benefit more from rTPA treatment.Results: Wake-up Stroke (WUS) accounts for about 25% of all ischemic strokes. Differences according to sex in the WUS subgroup has been poorly investigated so far, so we aimed to assess these differences by differentiating the enrolled population based on treatment administered.We retrospectively analysed clinical and imaging data of WUS patients admitted to our hospital between November 2013 and December 2018 dividing them in two groups: rTPA-treated and non-rTPA treated group. To point out outcome differences we evaluated: NIHSS at 7 days or at discharge, mRS at discharge and ΔNIHSS.We enrolled 149 WUS patients, 74 rTPA treated and 75 non-rTPA treated. Among rTPA treated patients, time from last known well (LKW) to Emergency Department (ED) admission was longer in females than males (610 vs 454 min), while females had a higher ΔNIHSS than males (5 vs 3). Finally, among non-rTPA treated patients, females were older than males (85 vs 79 years), had a higher pre-admission mRS (although very low in both cases), had a longer length of stay (17 vs 13 days) and shown a higher NIHSS at discharge (4 vs 2) compared to males.Females not receiving thrombolytic treatment had worse functional outcome than males, showing a higher NIHSS at discharge but, in contrast, when treated with rTPA they showed better neurological recovery as measured by a greater ΔNIHSS. We emphasize the importance of a prompt recognition of WUS in females since they seem to benefit more from rTPA treatment.Conclusions: Wake-up Stroke (WUS) accounts for about 25% of all ischemic strokes. Differences according to sex in the WUS subgroup has been poorly investigated so far, so we aimed to assess these differences by differentiating the enrolled population based on treatment administered.We retrospectively analysed clinical and imaging data of WUS patients admitted to our hospital between November 2013 and December 2018 dividing them in two groups: rTPA-treated and non-rTPA treated group. To point out outcome differences we evaluated: NIHSS at 7 days or at discharge, mRS at discharge and ΔNIHSS.We enrolled 149 WUS patients, 74 rTPA treated and 75 non-rTPA treated. Among rTPA treated patients, time from last known well (LKW) to Emergency Department (ED) admission was longer in females than males (610 vs 454 min), while females had a higher ΔNIHSS than males (5 vs 3). Finally, among non-rTPA treated patients, females were older than males (85 vs 79 years), had a higher pre-admission mRS (although very low in both cases), had a longer length of stay (17 vs 13 days) and shown a higher NIHSS at discharge (4 vs 2) compared to males.Females not receiving thrombolytic treatment had worse functional outcome than males, showing a higher NIHSS at discharge but, in contrast, when treated with rTPA they showed better neurological recovery as measured by a greater ΔNIHSS. We emphasize the importance of a prompt recognition of WUS in females since they seem to benefit more from rTPA treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Stroke-heart syndrome is a physiopathological condition of cardiac suffering due to cerebral injury secondary to major vessel occlusion in anterior circulation. It can be detected by increase in cardiac blood biomarkers. Our aim was to investigate a possible ancillary effect of thrombolysis in mitigating Stroke-Heart Syndrome after acute ischaemic stroke. Patients and methods: We retrospectively collected ischaemic stroke patients admitted to our Stroke Unit between August 1, 2017 and December 31, 2020 and acutely treated for an intracranial anterior circulation occlusion, without anamnestic ischaemic cardiopathy. We divided patients into Group B ("Bridge") including patients treated with both thrombolysis and thrombectomy and Group D ("Direct") including primary thrombectomies. Results: 120 patients were included in the study. Group B consisted of 92 patients, Group D of 28 patients, without significant differences in age, baseline and discharge NIHSS, cardiovascular risk factors or TOAST aetiology. Whilst admission, troponin levels were similar in both groups, significant differences in troponin peak (median 16 ng/L in Group B vs 45 ng/L in Group D, p = 0.022) and BNP values (median 455 pg/mL in Group B vs 784 pg/mL in Group D, p = 0.031) were found in the first 72 h since admission. Functional independence at discharge was significantly higher in Group B than Group D (mRS 0–2 36% vs 10%, p = 0.011). Discussion and conclusion: Significant differences in troponin peak and BNP values suggest a reduced stroke-related heart impairment in patients treated with bridge therapeutic approach: thrombolysis prior to thrombectomy could have a complementary effect on reducing Stroke-Heart Syndrome, improving overall neurological outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundAimsMethods and proceduresOutcomes and resultsConclusionsClinical guidelines recommend the administration of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator thrombolytic treatment to persons who suffered ischemic stroke within 4,5 hours since onset. However, the available evidence on the potential improvement of language after thrombolysis is still scanty.This study assessed the effect of thrombolytic treatment in language recovery in persons with stroke aphasia (PWA) comparing the efficacy of traditional language assessments and a multilevel procedure of discourse analysis applied to the Cookie Theft picture descriptions taken from the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS).Fortyeight individuals participated in the study: sixteen PWA who received thrombolysis; sixteen PWA who did not receive it; sixteen healthy controls. The two groups of PWA were balanced in terms of age, education, gender, lateralization of the lesion, and stroke severity. They were administered the NIHSS and a bedside language assessment battery when entering the neurological clinic (T0) and after approximately 72 hours (T1). Their narrative discourse descriptions were analyzed with a multilevel procedure for discourse analysis.The two groups of PWA had similar linguistic difficulties at T0 as reflected by comparable Composite Verbal Scores and performance on traditional linguistic bedside assessment (Aphasia PostStroke Acute Assessment test; Furlanis et al., 2018). Discourse analysis highlighted the presence of more omissions of function words and errors of cohesion in the PWA who would receive thrombolysis with respect to healthy controls and allowed for the identification, in both groups, of difficulties that could not be detected through a traditional assessment. At T1 the analyses showed the presence of improvements likely reflecting a generalized spontaneous recovery in both groups of PWA and a more specific recovery triggered by thrombolysis concerning the production of global coherence errors in treated patients only. An inspection of the gravity of the linguistic symptoms at the individual level revealed high interindividual variability in this early phase suggesting that thrombolysis reduced the severity of the impairment also in the production of informative words.Thrombolysis reduces the gravity of some linguistic symptoms within a few hours after treatment. Multilevel procedures of discourse analysis can identify these subtle improvements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Convulsive (CSE) and non-convulsive (NCSE) Status Epilepticus are a complication in 0.2–0.3% ischemic strokes. Large stroke and cortical involvement are the main risk factors for developing SE. This study evaluates the prevalence of SE in patients treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) through EEG recording within 72- h from admission. Moreover, we compared clinical, radiological, and outcome measures in SE and no-SE patients. We collected retrospectively demographical and clinical characteristics of acute ischemic stroke patients who underwent EVT, admitted in the Stroke Unit (SU) of the University Hospital of Trieste between January 2018 and March 2020 who underwent EEG recording within 72- h from the symptoms' onset. Out of 247 EVT patients, 138 met the inclusion criteria, of whom 9 (6.5%) showed SE with median onset time of 1 day (IQR 1–2). No difference was found between the two groups as for age, sex, risk factors, grade of recanalization, etiology of stroke, and closed vessel. The no-SE group presented higher NIHSS improvement rate (p=0.025) compared to the SE group. The sum of the lobes involved in the ischemic lesion was significantly higher in SE group (p=0.048). SE after EVT in large strokes is a non-rare complication, with most being NCSE. Performing a rapid EEG assessment in a Stroke Unit setting may allow for a prompt recognition and treatment of SE in the acute/hyper-acute phase. SE may be correlated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with large vessel occlusion. • Status epilepticus (SE) is an uncommon complication after ischemic stroke. • EEG recording in Stroke Unit (SU) is not widely applied. • We found a high prevalence of SE after mechanical thrombectomy. • EEG in SU could detect SE in acute phase after large strokes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]