Search

Diffuse midline gliomas (DMG) and diffuse hemispheric glioma (DHG) are both rare tumors characterized and recognized for specific alterations of histone 3 including H3K27 (DMG) and H3G34 (DHG). Despite these tumors arising from alterations of the same gene their clinical, radiological, and molecular behaviors strongly diverge, requiring a personalized therapeutic approach.We performed a review on Medline/PudMed aiming to search papers relative to prospective trials, retrospective studies, case series, and case reports of interest in order to investigate current knowledge toward the main clinical and molecular characteristics, radiology, and diagnosis, loco-regional and systemic treatments of these tumors. Moreover, we also evaluated the novel treatments under investigation.Thanks to an increased knowledge of the genomic landscape of these rare tumors, there are novels promising therapeutic targets for these malignancies. However, the majority of available trials allowed enrollment only in DMG, while few studies are focused on or allow the inclusion of DHG patients.

A high tumor mutational burden and mismatch repair deficiency are observed in 'hypermutated' high-grade gliomas (HGGs); however, the molecular characterization of this distinct subtype and whether it predicts the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are largely unknown. Pembrolizumab is a valid therapeutic option for the treatment of hypermutated cancers of diverse origin, but only a few clinical trials have explored the activity of ICIs in hypermutated HGGs. HGGs appear to differ from other cancers, likely due to the prevalence of subclonal versus clonal neoantigens, which are unable to elicit an immune response with ICIs. The main aim of this review is to summarize the current knowledge on hypermutation in HGGs, focusing on the broken promises of tumor mutational burden and mismatch repair deficiency as potential biomarkers of response to ICIs.An interesting question arising in neuro-oncology is whether a high mutational load (a condition termed ‘hypermutation’) can be as immunogenic in high-grade gliomas as in other solid tumors. The most recent literature has raised the question of whether hypermutated high-grade gliomas may be ‘insensitive’ to immunotherapy, especially in patients pretreated with temozolomide, which is the standard of care for glioma therapy. The purpose of this review is to summarize the available evidence on hypermutated gliomas and their sensitivity to immunotherapy agents.

Background Cabozantinib, a potent multi-tyrosine kinases inhibitor (TKI), has demonstrated overall survival (OS) benefit over everolimus in patients previously treated with VEGFR TKI for metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC). The efficacy of systemic treatments after cabozantinib failure has not been investigated. Methods We conducted a retrospective study on patients receiving systemic treatment after cabozantinib failure in heavily pre-treated patient with mRCC. We assessed Time to Treatment Failure (TTF), OS and objective response rate (ORR). Results Among 150 patients treated with cabozantinib in our institution, 56 (37.3%) received subsequent systemic therapy and were eligible for the analysis. IMDC prognostic group was good, intermediate and poor in 11 (19.6%), 24 (42.9%) and 11 (19.6%) patients, respectively. Cabozantinib was administered mainly as a second (41.1%), or third (33.9%) line treatment. axitinib or immune-checkpoint inhibitors were the subsequent treatment in 18 (34.8%) patients for each everolimus (n:16, 28.6%), other angiogenesis inhibitors (n:4, 7.1%) TTF and OS from subsequent systemic therapy after cabozantinib failure were 2.8 months (95%CI 1.9-3.7) and 7.7 months (95%CI 4.4-10.8), respectively. ORR was 8.7% and two patients with axitinib and two patients treated with Immune checkpoint inhibitors achieved a partial response. Conclusions Overall, activity of systemic therapies after cabozantinib was limited. Micro abstract We performed a retrospective analysis on 56 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received at least 1 systemic treatment line after cabozantinib. Median OS after cabozantinib was 7.7 months, while median TTF after cabozantinib was 2.8 months. Further investigation is needed in this clinical context

To date, there are no standardized systemic treatment options for patients with metastatic pituitary carcinoma progressed to chemo and radiation therapy. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been successfully assessed in other solid malignancies and could be a concrete hope for these patients. We performed a critical review of the literature aimed to evaluate studies assessing ICIs in pituitary malignancies. We also conducted research about published translational data assessing immune-contexture in these malignancies. Some preliminary reports reported a successful administration of pembrolizumab or the combination between nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with metastatic ACTH-secreting pituitary carcinomas. Translational data suggest that adenomas secreting growth hormone and ACTH have a suppressed immune-microenvironment, which could be more likely to benefit from ICIs. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors can be an effective treatment in patients with pituitary carcinoma and maybe also recurrent adenoma. Tumors secreting growth hormone and ACTH are more likely to benefit from ICIs due to a different immune-microenvironment.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary tumor of the central nervous system. Arising from neuroepithelial glial cells, GBM is characterized by invasive behavior, extensive angiogenesis, and genetic heterogeneity that contributes to poor prognosis and treatment failure. Currently, there are several molecular biomarkers available to aid in diagnosis, prognosis, and predicting treatment outcomes; however, all require the biopsy of tumor tissue. Nevertheless, a tissue sample from a single location has its own limitations, including the risk related to the procedure and the difficulty of obtaining longitudinal samples to monitor treatment response and to fully capture the intratumoral heterogeneity of GBM. To date, there are no biomarkers in blood or cerebrospinal fluid for detection, follow-up, or prognostication of GBM. Liquid biopsy offers an attractive and minimally invasive solution to support different stages of GBM management, assess the molecular biology of the tumor, identify early recurrence and longitudinal genomic evolution, predict both prognosis and potential resistance to chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and allow patient selection for targeted therapies. The aim of this review is to describe the current knowledge regarding the application of liquid biopsy in glioblastoma, highlighting both benefits and obstacles to translation into clinical care.Implications for PracticeTo translate liquid biopsy into clinical practice, further prospective studies are required with larger cohorts to increase specificity and sensitivity. With the ever-growing interest in RNA nanotechnology, microRNAs may have a therapeutic role in brain tumors.

Brain metastases (BMs) represent a negative prognostic factor for patients with solid malignancies. BMs are generally approached with loco-regional treatments and the blood–brain barrier limits the efficacy of some systemic drugs. The aim of this review is to summarize current knowledge about the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors for the management of brain metastases in patients with solid malignancies. We performed a review of available literature. Immune checkpoint inhibitors represent the standard treatment for several advanced solid malignancies. However, with the exception of melanoma their clinical role in other solid malignancies is not completely clear due to the exclusion of patients with BM from approval clinical trials. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors may be an effective treatment of brain metastases of melanoma while their clinical role on brain metastases from other solid malignancies is uncertain.

Background: To date, no prospective study has been conducted to investigate the role of socioeconomic status (SES) on clinical outcome of glioblastoma (GBM) in Italy, where there is a National Health Service that provides universal coverage regardless of the patient's economic status. Methods: We performed a prospective observational study investigating the association between SES and survival in GBM patients at our institution, a hub centre for brain cancer research and treatment. We included GBM patients who underwent medical treatment or chemo-radiation between April 2017 and December 2017. The SES was measured using the income-brackets, attributed by the Italian Ministry of Finance on the basis of the income of the fiscal family unit, referring to the previous year. Results: One hundred and six patients were included in the study. In multivariate analysis, overall survival (OS) correlated significantly with higher-income (HR = 0.623.95% CI 0.467–0.832; p = 0.001) and MGMT methylation status (HR = 0.158.95% CI 0.082–0.304; P < 0.001). When adjusted for age, performance status and extension of surgery, survival benefit remained superior for higher-income HR = 0.641 (95% CI 0.478–0.858; p = 0.003) and MGMT methylated tumours HR = 0.167 (95% CI 0.084–0.331; p < 0.001). Conclusions: SES is an important determinant of prognosis in GBM even in the Italian National Health Service, which provides universal, largely free and relatively comprehensive healthcare. Despite aspirations to achieve equality in healthcare, socioeconomic differences exist and may impact the clinical outcome.

The International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria have been largely adopted in clinical practice. In a recent retrospective study, we assessed that the addition of the first site of metastatic disease to brain, bone, and liver improves prognostic stratification of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Here, we performed an external validation in patients with mRCC. Our aim was to evaluate if the addition of a new independent variable could improve IMDC prognosis prediction and reduce heterogeneity within risk categories.We selected all 1073 patients treated at a single institution for mRCC and included in the Institute Gustave Roussy Renal Cell Carcinoma database. All patients included received at least 1 line of targeted therapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Univariate and multivariate analyses (Cox regression model) were performed. Bootstrap validation of the final model was also carried out for internal validation. The IMDC modified classification was defined by the addition of the seventh variable, and we defined the modified IMDC good-risk criteria as 0 risks, intermediate-risk as 1 to 2 risks, and poor-risk as 3 or more risks.The presence of brain, bone, and/or liver as the first site of metastatic disease plus the other variables included in the IMDC score were statistically significant variables associated with overall survival (OS) after univariate and multivariate analysis and bootstrap validation. Finally, 122 (15%) patients had a modification of their initial risk category. The median OS in the poor-, intermediate-, and favorable-risk groups was 10, 26, and 52 months, respectively (P .001). The bias-corrected concordance index in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (n = 241) was 0.71.The addition of brain, bone, and/or liver metastases as an additional variable to the other IMDC variables improves the prognostic predictive power of the model.

Majority of patients with clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) at first line (1L) treatment are classified in the intermediate-risk (IR) subgroup according to International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) score. As these patients have different prognosis, the aim of this study is to better characterize IR patients in order to better tailor the treatment. Retrospective analysis was performed from IGReCC (Institut Gustave Roussy Renal Cell Carcinoma) database. Overall survival (OS) was defined from start of 1L therapy to death or last follow-up. A multivariable Cox model with backward selection procedure (α = 0.01) and a Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis were performed to identify which prognostic factors were associated to OS in IR patients. From 2005 to 2017, 777 patients with ccRCC were treated with an anti-VEGF 1L therapy. Among 571 evaluable patients for IMDC score, 290 (51%) were classified as IR. With median follow-up 5.8 years (min: 0, max: 12.4) 212 deaths (73%) were observed and median OS was 25 months. Only platelet count was significantly associated to OS (hazard ratio 1.88 [95% CI 1.27–2.88] p = 0.0017). Median OS for patients with PLT > UNL was 18 months [95% CI 12–23] versus 29 months [95% CI 21.4–35.7] for patients with normal PLT count. The selection of PLT count was confirmed on bootstrap samples and was also selected for the first split of the CART-tree analysis. Patients in the IR group have a heterogeneous prognosis. Elevated PLT count seems identifies a subgroup of patients with poor outcome in the IMDC intermediate-risk population with ccRCC.

Purpose: Artificial Intelligence (AI) involves several and different techniques able to elaborate a large amount of data responding to a specific planned outcome. There are several possible applications of this technology in neuro-oncology. Methods: We reviewed, according to PRISMA guidelines, available studies adopting AI in different fields of neuro-oncology including neuro-radiology, pathology, surgery, radiation therapy, and systemic treatments. Results: Neuro-radiology presented the major number of studies assessing AI. However, this technology is being successfully tested also in other operative settings including surgery and radiation therapy. In this context, AI shows to significantly reduce resources and costs maintaining an elevated qualitative standard. Pathological diagnosis and development of novel systemic treatments are other two fields in which AI showed promising preliminary data. Conclusion: It is likely that AI will be quickly included in some aspects of daily clinical practice. Possible applications of these techniques are impressive and cover all aspects of neuro-oncology.

The clinical management of glioblastoma (GBM) is still bereft of treatments able to significantly improve the poor prognosis of the disease. Despite the extreme clinical need for novel therapeutic drugs, only a small percentage of patients with GBM benefit from inclusion in a clinical trial. Moreover, often clinical studies do not lead to final interpretable conclusions. From the mistakes and negative results obtained in the last years, we are now able to plan a novel generation of clinical studies for patients with GBM, allowing the testing of multiple anticancer agents at the same time. This assumes critical importance, considering that, thanks to improved knowledge of altered molecular mechanisms related to the disease, we are now able to propose several potential effective compounds in patients with both newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM. Among the novel compounds assessed, the initially great enthusiasm toward trials employing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) was disappointing due to the negative results that emerged in three randomized phase III trials. However, novel biological insights into the disease suggest that immunotherapy can be a convincing and effective treatment in GBM even if ICIs failed to prolong the survival of these patients. In this regard, the most promising approach consists of engineered immune cells such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T, CAR M, and CAR NK alone or in combination with other treatments. In this review, we discuss several issues related to systemic treatments in GBM patients. First, we assess critical issues toward the planning of clinical trials and the strategies employed to overcome these obstacles. We then move on to the most relevant interventional studies carried out on patients with previously untreated (newly diagnosed) GBM and those with recurrent and pretreated disease. Finally, we investigate novel immunotherapeutic approaches with special emphasis on preclinical and clinical data related to the administration of engineered immune cells in GBM.

Purpose The canonical isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 R132 mutation (IDH1 R132) is the most frequent mutation among IDH mutated gliomas. Non-canonical IDH1 mutations or IDH2 mutations are unusual and their clinical and biological role is still unclear.Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the clinical role of IDH non-canonical mutations. ResultsOverall, we selected 13 of 3513 studies reporting data of 4007 patients with a diagnosis of grade 2 and grade 3 including 3091 patients with a molecularly proven IDH1 or IDH2 mutation. Patients with non-canonical IDH1 mutations were younger and presented a higher DNA methylation level as compared to those with canonical IDH1 R132H alteration. The overall incidence of non-canonical IDH1 mutations was 7.9% (95% CI 5.4 – 10.7%) in patients with IDH mutated gliomas. There was no statistical difference in terms of incidence between patients with grade 2 or grade 3 glioma. Patients with non-canonical IDH mutations had a lower rate of 1p19q codeletion (risk difference: 31%, 95% CI 23 -38%) and presented a significantly prolonged survival (pooled-HR 0.47, 95% CI, 0.28-0.81) as compared to those with IDH1 R132H mutation. Conclusion Non-canonical IDH1 mutations occur in 7.9% of IDH mutated gliomas and recognize a specific subgroup of patients with an improved survival despite a lower rate of 1p19q codeletion. Data about the type of IDH mutation should be collected in clinical practice and within interventional trials as this could be a critical variable for an improved patient’s stratification and selection.

Breast cancer (BC) is the second most common tumour spreading to the central nervous system (CNS). The prognosis of patients with CNS metastases depends on several parameters including the molecular assessment of the disease. Although loco-regional treatment remains the best approach, systemic therapies are acquiring a role leading to remarkable long-lasting responses. The efficacy of these compounds diverges between tumours with different molecular assessments. Promising agents under investigation are drugs targeting the HER2 pathways such as tucatinib, neratinib, pyrotinib, trastuzumab deruxtecan. In addition, there are several promising agents under investigation for patients with triple-negative brain metastases (third-generation taxane, etirinotecan, sacituzumab, immune-checkpoint inhibitors) and hormone receptor-positive brain metastases (CDK 4/5, phosphoinositide-3-kinase-mammalian target of rapamycin [PI3K/mTOR] inhibitors). Also, the systemic treatment of leptomeningeal metastases, which represents a very negative prognostic site of metastases, is likely to change as several compounds are under investigation, some with interesting preliminary results. Here we performed a comprehensive review focusing on the current management of CNS metastases according to molecular subtypes, site of metastases (leptomeningeal vs brain), and systemic treatments under investigation.

Simple Summary Nowadays, very few systemic agents have shown clinical activity in patients with glioblastoma, making the research of novel therapeutic approaches a critical issue. Fortunately, the availability of novel compounds is increasing thanks to better biological knowledge of the disease. In this review we want to investigate more promising ongoing clinical trials in both primary and recurrent GBM. Furthermore, a great interest of the present work is focused on novel trial design strategies. Abstract Management of glioblastoma is a clinical challenge since very few systemic treatments have shown clinical efficacy in recurrent disease. Thanks to an increased knowledge of the biological and molecular mechanisms related to disease progression and growth, promising novel treatment strategies are emerging. The expanding availability of innovative compounds requires the design of a new generation of clinical trials, testing experimental compounds in a short time and tailoring the sample cohort based on molecular and clinical behaviors. In this review, we focused our attention on the assessment of promising novel treatment approaches, discussing novel trial design and possible future fields of development in this setting.

Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumors. The majority of meningiomas are benign, but they can present different grades of dedifferentiation from grade I to grade III (anaplastic/malignant) that are associated with different outcomes. Radiological surveillance is a valid option for low-grade asymptomatic meningiomas. In other cases, the treatment is usually surgical, aimed at achieving a complete resection. The use of adjuvant radiotherapy is the gold standard for grade III, is debated for grade II and is not generally indicated for radically resected grade I meningiomas. The use of systemic treatments is not standardized. Here we report a review of the literature on the clinical, radiological and molecular characteristics of meningiomas, available treatment strategies and ongoing clinical trials.

Background:The management of renal cell carcinoma is rapidly evolving and immunotherapy, mostly consisting of immune checkpoint inhibitors, is revolutionizing the treatment scenario of metastatic patients. Novel fractionation schedules of radiotherapy, consisting of high doses in few fractions, can overcome the radioresistance of this tumor. Localized radiotherapy is associated with a systemic effect, known as the abscopal effect. This effect mediated by the immune system can be enhanced associating radiotherapy with immunotherapy.Objective:In this review, we explore the role of radiotherapy and immunotherapy in RCC, the rationale of combining these strategies and the on-going clinical trials investigating combinations of these two treatment modalities.Conclusion:Combining immunotherapy and radiotherapy has a strong rationale and pre-clinical studies support their association because it can overcome the immunosuppression of the tumor microenvironment and increase the anti-tumor immune response. More clinical evidence, deriving from onclinical trials, are needed to prove the efficacy and safety of these treatments combined.

Introduction: Monoclonal antibodies directed against programmed cell death-1 (anti-PD-1) and its ligand (anti-PD-L1) showed a significant efficacy among different immunogenic metastatic tumors such as melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) dependent on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs), immune-related liver diseases are uncommon and a definitive diagnosis is not always feasible. Areas covered: We revised data from phase II/III clinical trials and real-world retrospective analyses on liver-related adverse events induced by anti-PD-1 (nivolumab/pembrolizumab) and anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab) in advanced cancer populations (melanoma, NSCLC and RCC). Furthermore, we described clinical-pathological patterns of immune-related liver diseases in real-life. Expert opinion: Use of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 led to a paradigm shift in the management of patients with melanoma, NSCLC and RCC. IrAEs can occur potentially in any tissue, leading to discontinuation of ICPIs, at least in a small proportion of these patients, and to a negative impact on their prognosis. Hepatobiliary immune-related adverse events are underestimated due to inappropriate monitoring. Development of novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for cancer patients receiving ICPIs as well as the identification of predictive biomarkers of liver injury could allow a better patients’ selection and improve clinical outcomes of immune-related liver diseases.

Background Several models are adopted in clinical practice to estimate prognosis of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC); however, none of these models have evaluated patients treated by immune-checkpoint inhibitors. The aim of this study was to investigate if the site of initial metastasis could be a parameter able to stratified prognosis among patients with mRCC among different risk groups defined by the International Metastatic Renal Cell Database Consortium (IMDC) model. The site of initial metastasis was defined as the primary tissue or organ in which metastasis was diagnosed in the course of the medical history of the disease. Patients and Methods A total of 134 patients treated between January 2010 and December 2018 in our institution were retrospectively evaluated. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) defined as the time from initiation of first-line therapy to death from any cause. Of note, 26 (19.4%) patients received immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Univariable analysis was performed through the log-rank test to estimate the effect of number of metastatic sites and site of initial metastasis on OS. Subsequently, a Cox regression proportional hazards model was employed in multivariable analysis. Results Of the 12 variables analyzed, 4 were statistically associated to worse OS in univariable analysis (number of metastases and liver, bone, or central nervous system metastases). Multivariate analysis confirmed that bone (hazard ratio [HR], 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-3.13), liver (HR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.59-4.42), and central nervous system (HR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.62-6.74) initial metastases were independent parameters related to worse OS. The presence of 1 or more of the selected sites recognized specific populations of patients associated to worse prognosis in both good (P = .003) and intermediate (P = .047) risk groups. Conclusion The site of initial metastasis defines specific populations of patients associated with worse prognosis in the good and intermediate IMDC groups.

Simple Summary Only 1% of all meningioma diagnosis is classified as malignant (anaplastic) meningioma. Due to their rarity, clinical management of these tumors presents several gaps. In this review, we investigate current knowledge of anaplastic meningioma focusing on their pathological and radiological diagnosis, molecular assessment, and loco-regional and systemic management. Despite the current marginal role of systemic therapy, it is possible that the increasing knowledge of molecular altered pathways of the disease will lead to the development of novel effective systemic treatments. Background: Meningiomas are the most common primary central nervous system malignancies accounting for 36% of all intracranial tumors. However, only 1% of meningioma is classified as malignant (anaplastic) meningioma. Due to their rarity, clinical management of these tumors presents several gaps. Methods: We carried out a narrative review aimed to investigate current knowledge of anaplastic meningioma focusing on their pathological and radiological diagnosis, molecular assessment, and loco-regional and systemic management. Results: The most frequent genetic alteration occurring in meningioma is the inactivation in the neurofibromatosis 2 genes (merlin). The accumulation of copy number losses, including 1p, 6p/q, 10q, 14q, and 18p/q, and less frequently 2p/q, 3p, 4p/q, 7p, 8p/q, and 9p, compatible with instability, is restricted to NF2 mutated meningioma. Surgery and different RT approaches represent the milestone of grade 3 meningioma management, while there is a marginal role of systemic therapy. Conclusions: Anaplastic meningiomas are rare tumors, and diagnosis should be suspected and confirmed by trained radiologists and pathologists. Despite the current marginal role of systemic therapy, it is possible that the increasing knowledge of molecular altered pathways of the disease will lead to the development of novel effective systemic treatments.

Simple Summary In the last decade, medulloblastoma entered the molecular era, with progressive advances in the knowledge of the molecular biology of this rare tumor. These expanding data have allowed the recognition of four distinct molecular subgroups, and, subsequently, the design of novel clinical trials to update the treatment protocols adopted so far, with the introduction of new molecular targeted drugs. Abstract Medulloblastoma is a rare malignancy of the posterior cranial fossa. Although until now considered a single disease, according to the current WHO classification, it is a heterogeneous tumor that comprises multiple molecularly defined subgroups, with distinct gene expression profiles, pathogenetic driver alterations, clinical behaviors and age at onset. Adult medulloblastoma, in particular, is considered a rarer “orphan” entity in neuro-oncology practice because while treatments have progressively evolved for the pediatric population, no practice-changing prospective, randomized clinical trials have been performed in adults. In this scenario, the toughest challenge is to transfer the advances in cancer genomics into new molecularly targeted therapeutics, to improve the prognosis of this neoplasm and the treatment-related toxicities. Herein, we focus on the recent advances in targeted therapy of medulloblastoma based on the new and deeper knowledge of disease biology.

Gliomas are the most frequent central nervous system (CNS) primary tumors. The prognosis and clinical outcomes of these malignancies strongly diverge according to their molecular alterations and range from a few months to decades. The tumor-associated microenvironment involves all cells and connective tissues surrounding tumor cells. The composition of the microenvironment as well as the interactions with associated neoplastic mass, are both variables assuming an increasing interest in these last years. This is mainly because the microenvironment can mediate progression, invasion, dedifferentiation, resistance to treatment, and relapse of primary gliomas. In particular, the tumor microenvironment strongly diverges from isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutated and wild-type (wt) tumors. Indeed, IDH mutated gliomas often show a lower infiltration of immune cells with reduced angiogenesis as compared to IDH wt gliomas. On the other hand, IDH wt tumors exhibit a strong immune infiltration mediated by several cytokines and chemokines, including CCL2, CCL7, GDNF, CSF-1, GM-CSF, etc. The presence of several factors, including Sox2, Oct4, PD-L1, FAS-L, and TGF β2, also mediate an immune switch toward a regulatory inhibited immune system. Other important interactions are described between IDH wt glioblastoma cells and astrocytes, neurons, and stem cells, while these interactions are less elucidated in IDH-mutated tumors. The possibility of targeting the microenvironment is an intriguing perspective in terms of therapeutic drug development. In this review, we summarized available evidence related to the glioma microenvironment, focusing on differences within different glioma subtypes and on possible therapeutic development.

Diffuse low-grade gliomas account for approximately 20% of all primary brain tumors, they arise from glial cells and show infiltrative growth without histological features of malignancy. Mutations of the IDH1 and IDH2 genes constitute a reliable molecular signature of low-grade gliomas and are the earliest driver mutations occurring during gliomagenesis, representing a relevant biomarker with diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive value. IDH mutations induce a neomorphic enzyme that converts alpha-ketoglutarate to the oncometabolite D-2-hydroxyglutarate, which leads to widespread effects on cellular epigenetics and metabolism. Currently, there are no approved molecularly targeted therapies and the standard treatment for low-grade gliomas consists of radiation therapy and chemotherapy, with rising concern about treatment-related toxicities. Targeting D-2-hydroxyglutarate is considered a novel attractive therapeutic approach for low-grade gliomas and the insights from clinical trials suggest that mutant-selective IDH inhibitors are the ideal candidates, with a favorable benefit/risk ratio. A pivotal question is whether blocking IDH neomorphic activity may activate alternative oncogenetic pathways, inducing acquired resistance to IDH inhibitors. Based on this rationale, combination therapies to enhance the antitumor activity of IDH inhibitors and approaches aimed at exploiting, rather than inhibiting, the metabolism of IDH-mutant cancer cells, such as poly (adenosine 5 '-diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, are emerging from preclinical research and clinical trials. In this review, we discuss the pivotal role of IDH mutations in gliomagenesis and the complex interactions between the genomic and epigenetic landscapes, providing an overview of how, in the last decade, therapeutic approaches for low-grade gliomas have evolved.

Introduction The field of cancer immunotherapy has achieved great advancements through the application of genetically engineered T cells with chimeric antigen receptors (CAR), that have shown exciting success in eradicating hematologic malignancies and have proved to be safe with promising early signs of antitumoral activity in the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM). Areas covered : We discuss the use of CAR T cells in GBM, focusing on limitations and obstacles to advancement, mostly related to toxicities, hostile tumor microenvironment, limited CAR T cells infiltration and persistence, target antigen loss/heterogeneity and inadequate trafficking. Furthermore, we introduce the refined strategies aimed at strengthening CAR T activity and offer insights in to novel immunotherapeutic approaches, such as the potential use of CAR NK or CAR M to optimize anti-tumor effects for GBM management. Expert opinion With the progressive wide use of CAR T cell therapy, significant challenges in treating solid tumors, including central nervous system (CNS) tumors, are emerging, highlighting early disease relapse and cancer cell resistance issues, owing to hostile immunosuppressive microenvironment and tumor antigen heterogeneity. In addition to CAR T cells, there is great interest in utilizing other types of CAR-based therapies, such as CAR natural killer (CAR NK) or CAR macrophages (CAR M) cells for CNS tumors.

BACKGROUND Non-canonical isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations are uncommon among patients with grade 2 and 3 gliomas and their clinical significance is still unclear. METHOD We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic impact of IDH1 and IDH2 non-canonical mutations. We searched English-written articles published on PubMed/Medline, Cochrane library, and Scopus until the 1st May 2021. Keywords adopted for the research were: ‘’IDH’’ OR ‘’IDH1’’ OR ‘’IDH2’’ OR ‘’Isocitrate dehydrogenase’’ AND ‘’glioma’’. RESULTS We selected 13 of 3513 studies reporting data of 4007 patients with a diagnosis of grade 2 and grade 3 including 3091 patients with a molecular proven IDH 1 or IDH 2 mutations. Between patients with IDH mutated gliomas, 479 (15.5%) patients showed non-canonical IDH 1 or IDH 2 mutations. The presence of IDH 1 non-canonical mutation occurred in younger age and in non codeleted 1p19q as compared to canonical IDH 1 mutation. However, patients with IDH 2 mutations showed more frequently 1p19q codeletion as compared to those with canonical IDH 1 mutated glioma. Four studies reported complete data survival for patients with non-canonical (n= 160) and canonical mutations (n= 1019). The pooled HR of these studies was 0.47 (95% CI, 0.28-0.81) confirming a positive prognostic role for non-canonical IDH 1 and IDH 2 mutations. CONCLUSION The presence of non-canonical IDH 1 and IDH 2 mutations defines a specific subgroup of gliomas occurring at younger age with improved survival. Patients with a non-canonical IDH 1 mutation showed less frequently 1p19q codeletion as compared to those patients harboring a canonical or IDH 2 mutation.

Antiangiogenic agents can induce a distinct MRI pattern in glioblastoma, characterized by a decrease in the contrast enhancement on T1‐weighted images and a simultaneous hyperintensity on T2‐weighted or fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery images.

In the past few years several hormonal agents have been tested in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) leading to an impressive improvement in terms of metastases-free survival (MFS). We performed a meta-analysis aimed to: (1) estimate the pooled effect of new hormonal compounds in terms of MFS, overall survival (OS) in overall and specific subpopulations; and (2) estimate the effect of high-grade toxicities of these drugs. We identified 881 studies published between January 1, 2010 and February 16, 2018 on PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. Three randomized placebo controlled clinical trials were selected (PROSPER, SPARTAN, and ARAMIS). Because of the absence of individual data, all of the analyses performed were made on aggregated data provided in selected studies. We used the inverse variance technique for the meta-analysis of the hazard ratios collected for MFS and OS analysis. Fixed and randomized models were used. Relative risk and 95% confidence intervals and risk difference were estimated considering the number of Grade 3 adverse events in treatment and control arms. Administration of new hormonal compounds in nmCRPC patients led to a significant benefit in MFS in the overall population and in all subgroups analyzed. These agents might also improve OS but longer follow-up is needed to confirm this hypothesis. Indeed results of OS analysis should be carefully evaluated because none of the studies selected provided mature OS data. Administration of these agents resulted in a significant increased risk of treatment-related death, high cardiovascular toxicity, hypertension, fractures, and falls. Administration of new hormonal compounds prolongs the time of metastases occurrence and might prolong also survival in patients with nmCRPC. Treatment-related toxicity is an important issue because these agents increase the risk of death, cardiovascular toxicity, hypertension, fractures, and risk of falls.

Prostate cancer is the most frequent non-cutaneous malignancy in men in the United States. In the last few years, many recommendations have been made available from the 2014 International Society of Urologic Pathology consensus conference, 2016 World Health Organization blue book and 2018 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System. Here, we focus on four topics which are considered relevant on the basis of their common appearance in routine practice, clinical importance and ‘need to improve communication between pathology reports and clinicians’: prostate cancer classification, prostate cancer grading, prostate cancer staging, and current definition of clinically significant prostate cancer. Tissue biomarkers that can predict significant disease and/or upgrading and tissue-based genomics for the purpose of diagnosis and prognosis are mentioned briefly.

CONTEXT: 9p loss appears a reliable and promising marker able to differentiate specific categories of patients with renal cell carcinoma associated with a worse prognosis. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to systematically evaluate relative risk of death, cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) among patients harboring 9p loss. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We found a total of 92 potentially relevant articles focused on the detection of 9p loss in patients with renal cell carcinoma and clinical outcomes of this population. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were employed to carry out this work. Fourteen studies resulted to be eligible for this analysis; 11 of these reported data on 5-year overall survival, six on CSS and four on DFS. An increased risk of death has been observed in patients harboring 9p loss (pooled relative risk of 3.965; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.647-5.940, p