Search

This study aimed to evaluate the bond durability of dentin restorations bonded with light- or dual-cured etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. A three-step adhesive system (Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus), an acetone-based two-step adhesive system (Prime & Bond 2.1), and an ethanol-based two-step adhesive system (Excite) were tested. Both the light- and the dual-cured versions were evaluated. High C-factor dentin cavities were prepared on 120 bovine incisors, which were then restored with resin composite (n=10). The samples were stored in water for 24 hours, and half of them were subjected to additional degradation with 10% NaOCl for five hours. The push-out bond strength test was performed in a universal testing machine until failure. Failure modes were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed by three-way analysis of variance and Tukey tests (p<0.05). The dual-cured adhesive system presented a higher immediate bond strength and durability than those that were light cured. The three-step adhesive system produced the highest values, whereas the acetone-based adhesive system produced the lowest result. Therefore, the use of dual-cured etch-and-rinse adhesive systems can induce increased bond durability to direct coronal dentin restorations.

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of pre-heated composite restoratives on the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets., Methods: The following materials were tested: a microhybrid composite restorative (Filtek Z250), two nanofilled composite restoratives (Filtek Z350 and NT Premium), a nanohybrid composite restorative (Brilliant) and a conventional orthodontic adhesive (Transbond XT). All materials were stored for 1 h in the incubator either at 25°C (room temperature simulation) or 60°C before bonding 100 orthodontic brackets on bovine lower incisors (n = 10). One Coat Bond SL and Transbond XT were used to bond the composite restoratives and the Transbond XT adhesive paste, respectively. After storage in distilled water for 24 h, the brackets were subjected to SBS test at a speed of 0.5 mm/min until bracket debonding. The Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) was assigned to the fractured specimens. Data were analyzed using the one-way ANOVA and the Tukey post-hoc test (p < 0.05). The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare ARI scores between the groups (p < 0.05)., Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the materials at room temperature. Samples bonded with pre-heated materials showed a statistically higher SBS than those bonded with room temperature materials. Samples bonded with the pre-heated orthodontic adhesive showed the highest SBS among all the pre-heated materials. All preheated composite restoratives produced an SBS mean higher than that of Transbond XT stored at room temperature., Conclusion: The use of pre-heated composite restoratives and orthodontic adhesives might be an alternative approach to bond orthodontic brackets.